Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/science/article/pii/S1365160906001158
Abstract
The Geological Strength Index (GSI) system, proposed in 1995, is now widely used for the
estimation of the rock mass strength and the rock mass deformation parameters. The GSI system
concentrates on the description of two factors, rock structure and block surface conditions. The
guidelines given by the GSI system are for the estimation of the peak strength parameters of
jointed rock masses. There are no guidelines given by the GSI, or by any other system, for the
estimation of the rock mass residual strength that yield consistent results. In this paper, a method
is proposed to extend the GSI system for the estimation of a rock mass's residual strength. It is
proposed to adjust the peak GSI to the residual GSIr value based on the two major controlling
factors in the GSI systemthe residual block volume <img height="17" border="0"
style="vertical-align:bottom" width="19" alt="View the MathML source" title="View the
MathML source" src="http://origin-ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1365160906001158si1.gif">Vbr and the residual joint condition factor <img height="17" border="0"
style="vertical-align:bottom" width="16" alt="View the MathML source" title="View the
MathML source" src="http://origin-ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1365160906001158si2.gif">Jcr. Methods to estimate the residual block volume and joint condition factor are
presented. The proposed method for the estimation of rock mass's residual strength is validated
using in-situ block shear test data from three large-scale cavern construction sites and data from a
back-analysis of rock slopes. The estimated residual strengths, calculated using the reduced
residual GSIr value, are found to be in good agreement with field test or back-analyzed data.
Keywords
Rock mass;
Rock failure
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 705 675 1151; fax: +1 705 675 4838.
Copyright 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Failure Criterion
The following strength criteria are available in Phase2 for defining the strength of your rock
mass or soil:
Mohr-Coulomb
Hoek-Brown
Drucker-Prager
Generalized Hoek-Brown
Cam-Clay
Modified Cam-Clay
Discrete Function
1.
o
If the residual strength parameters are equal to the peak parameters, then
you are defining an "ideally" elastic-plastic material.
NOTE: if you define a material as Plastic, then you are restricted to Isotropic elastic
properties for that material. You cannot combine plasticity with Transversely Isotropic or
Orthotropic elastic properties.
Mohr-Coulomb
For the Mohr-Coulomb criterion you must define the following parameters:
Cohesion
Friction Angle
Tensile Strength
If you are not considering pore pressure in the analysis, then the cohesion and friction angle
are total stress parameters. If you are considering pore pressure, then cohesion and friction
angle are effective stress parameters.
If the Material Type = Plastic, you will also be able to define:
Dilation Angle
Hoek-Brown
The Hoek-Brown strength criterion in Phase2, refers to the ORIGINAL Hoek-Brown failure
criterion [ Hoek & Bray (1981) ], described by the following equation:
Note that this is a special case of the Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion, with the
constant a = 0.5. See below for definition of the parameters in this equation.
The original Hoek-Brown criterion has been found to work well for most rocks of good to
reasonable quality in which the rock mass strength is controlled by tightly interlocking
angular rock pieces.
For lesser quality rock masses, the Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion can be used.
Link to RocData / RocLab
For assistance with determining Hoek-Brown parameters you can startup RocData or
RocLab by selecting the
Generalized Hoek-Brown
For the Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion you must define the following parameters:
Dilation parameter
where:
mb is a reduced value (for the rock mass) of the material constant mi (for the intact
rock)
s and a are constants which depend upon the characteristics of the rock mass
and
In most cases it is practically impossible to carry out triaxial or shear tests on rock masses
at a scale which is necessary to obtain direct values of the parameters in the Generalized
Hoek-Brown equation. Therefore some practical means of estimating the material constants
mb, s and a is required. According to the latest research, the parameters of the Generalized
Hoek-Brown criterion [ Hoek, Carranza-Torres & Corkum (2002) ], can be determined from
the following equations:
where:
Drucker-Prager
Tensile Strength
q parameter
k parameter
Dilation parameter
q (residual), k(residual)
NOTE: if you wish to calculate equivalent Drucker-Prager parameters based on MohrCoulomb parameters, click here for the appropriate equations.
Cam-Clay
Specification of the Cam-Clay model requires five material parameters, and the initial state
of consolidation. These parameters are summarized below. For a theoretical overview of the
Cam-Clay and Modified Cam-Clay strength models, see the Theory section.
Lambda
Lambda ( ) is the slope of the normal compression (virgin consolidation) line and
critical state line (CSL) in
space.
Kappa
Kappa ( ) is the slope of a swelling (loading-unloading) line in
space.
space.
There are two possible methods of defining the elastic parameter for a Cam-Clay
material. You may enter either the Shear Modulus or Poissons Ratio. The choice of
parameter can be selected by the user in the Cam-Clay Options dialog (see below).
Initial State of Consolidation
There are two possible methods for defining the initial state of consolidation. The
Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR) is the ratio of the previous maximum mean stress to
the current mean stress. Or you can specify the Preconsolidation Pressure (Po). The
choice of parameter can be selected by the user in the Cam-Clay Options dialog (see
below).
Cam-Clay Options
If you select the Options button in the Define Material Properties dialog, you will be
able to choose the method of defining the following Cam-Clay parameters:
1.
o
The selections in the Cam-Clay Options dialog determine the Cam-Clay parameters
which can be entered in the Define Material Properties dialog, for a given material.
Modified Cam-Clay
The Modified Cam-Clay strength model in Phase2 has the same input parameters as the
Cam-Clay model, but uses the Modified Cam-Clay equations. See above for a summary of
input parameters.
For a theoretical overview of the Cam-Clay and Modified Cam-Clay strength models, see the
Theory section.
Discrete Function
The Discrete Function option allows you to define Mohr-Coulomb shear strength
parameters (cohesion, friction angle) at a grid of discrete points within a material. The shear
strength at any point within the material is then interpolated from the data at the grid
points. This allows you to define any type of strength distribution within a material. Elastic
modulus can also be defined at the discrete grid points.
See the Discrete Strength Function topic for details.
Dilation Parameter
Low dilation angles/parameters (i.e. zero) are generally associated with soft rocks while
high dilation angles/parameters (i.e. phi or m) are associated with hard brittle rock masses.
A good starting estimate is to use 0.333*m or 0.333*phi for soft rocks and 0.666*m or
0.666*phi for hard rocks.
Link to RocData / RocLab
If you have the programs RocData or RocLab installed on your computer, you can start up
these programs directly from the Define Material Properties dialog. You can then use
RocData or RocLab to help determine parameters for the Mohr-Coulomb, Hoek-Brown or
Generalized Hoek-Brown criteria (e.g. by curve fitting lab test data, for example).
To paste applicable results from RocData / RocLab into Phase2, first select the Copy
Data option in RocData / RocLab, and then select the paste button
in the Define
Material Properties dialog in Phase2. Applicable data will be pasted into the dialog. If
applicable results for the selected strength criterion are not found, an error message
will be displayed.
For information about RocData and RocLab see the Rocscience website.