You are on page 1of 3

SRI LANKA INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Department of Civil Engineering


Faculty of Engineering
SLIIT
CE3610 Environmental Engineering
Year 3 Semester 2 - 3rd August-8th November 2015
Batch 1

Assignment submission format for report on Field visit


Learning Outcomes to be covered from the assignment

LO1. Classify different water quality parameters for different uses


LO3. Apply the sustainability principles in pollution control

Each student is expected to submit a single report on self-reflections on both visits highlighting
the Importance of environmental engineering concepts for a civil engineer (title)
Word limit 1500 max
What to include
Submission cover sheet, title page (should contain the title (bold, 18 Times New Roman), other
information on the cover in 12 TNR, 2.0 spacing),
1.0 Introduction- write the role of a civil engineer in the society (250-300 words)
2.0 Observations/experience on visit to CEA and Biyagama water treatment plant (500-600
words)
3.0 Reflections write your reflections in relation to the learning outcomes 1 and 3 mentioned
above. (pl refer to the document on reflective writing uploaded in the course web) (500-600
words)
4.0 References
The referencing style for this unit is Chicago.
All the figures and pictures if any should be placed separately in an annexure.

Format of the first sheet

Importance of environmental engineering


concepts for a civil engineer

Report based on field visits to Central


Environmental Authority, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka
and
NWSDB-Biyagama drinking water treatment plant

Date

Margins standard, font- 12 TNR, spacing 1.5.

Submission
Date 25th September before 4.00 pm
Where - Submit to the assignment box in 5th floor office

Marking Rubric

Element

Weighting

Quality of Introduction

Excellent
(100%)

Very
Good
(75%)

Good
(50%)

Supporting
details
specific to
visit fully

Supporting
details
specific to
visit is
covered to
a great
extent

Some
details
are nonsupportin
g to the
visit

Satisfact
ory
(25%)

Unsatisfa
ctory
(0%)

Details
are
somewha
t
sketchy.
Do not
support
visit

Unable to
find
specific
details

10%

Observations/experience

Visit 1

10%

Visit 2

10%

Reflections

40%

how reflections are justified


wrt LO1

20%

how reflections are justified


wrt LO2

20%

Quality of references

10%

Quality of overall
presentation of report

10%

Ability of following the


given instructions

10%

Supporting
details
specific to
visit fully

Fully
comply

Supporting
details
specific to
visit is
covered to
a great
extent

Comply to
a
great
extent

Some
details
are nonsupportin
g to the
visit

Moderate

Details
are
somewha
t
sketchy.
Do not
support
visit

Unable to
find
specific
details

Comply
to some
extent

Completel
y out of
focus

You might also like