Professional Documents
Culture Documents
27-30 October
Bangkok, Thailand
Introduction
Radiography is a cheap and easy to use diagnostic
tool for determining intraabdominal mass lesions
(7). With radiography, abdominal structures can be
evaluated by their size, shape, density and position
(2, 3, 12). The malignity of mass lesions cannot be
determined with radiography. Also tissues with the
same density cannot be differentiated (5).
Ultrasonography is considered an ideal means for
diagnosing intraabdominal masses (7, 10, 11). Solid
and cystic masses can be easily differentiated with
ultrasonography. Also the localization and
relationship of the masses with nearby organs, the
masses effect on related organs and its origins can
be determined (3, 4, 8). Lots of researchers report
that using radiography and ultrasonography provides
better results (2, 3, 9). While diffuse or focal lesions
could be easily diagnosed with ultrasonography (3,
4, 7), the character (Malignity) of those masses
cannot be evaluated (5). Laparoscopy is a minimally
traumatic surgical procedure that is used for
treatment and diagnosis of abdominal organ and
tissue diseases (6, 11, 12). Laparoscopy is
considered an ideal diagnostic measure because it is
minimally traumatic, the postoperative recovery
period is short, and exact results are obtained by
using it (8, 12). Gathering biopsy material and and
diagnostic laparoscopy gets results that would only
be possible doing experimental laparotomy, which is
an invasive procedure (12). Despite the advances
advances in diagnosis techniques and perioperative
organization in the modern day, more than 20-30%
of the cases were diagnosed with new pathologies by
diagnostic laparoscopy (1).
In this study, which was done on clinical cases; Cats
and dogs with liver masses were evaluated by
radiography,
ultrasonograpy
and
diagnostic
laparoscopy, including gathering biopsy, and the aim
of the study was determining the exact nature of the
disease histopathologically and promoting the use of
laparoscopy to practical use.
O29
27-30 October
Bangkok, Thailand
References
1. Adusumll et al., 2006. FASEB J. 20: 726-728.
2. Barnes et al., 2006. Vet. Surg. 35: 243-251.
3. Cole et al., 2002. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc.
220: 1483-1490.
4. Hahn, 2003. Textbook of Small Animal
Surgery 3rd ed., W.B. Saunders Comp. 23132324.
5. Jones, 1990. Vet. Clin. North Am.20: 12431263.
6. Mles, 1997. Vet. Clin. North Am. 27: 14031431.
7. Monnet and Kudng, 2003. Textbook of Small
Animal Surgery 3rd ed., W.B. Saunders Comp.
2378-2382.
8. Nord and Boyd, 1994. Diag. Lap. Endo. 26:
126-133.
9. Philip and Amaral, 2001. Am. Col. Surg. 192:
525-536.
10. Rchter, 2001. Vet. Clin. North Am. 31: 707727.
11. Othuzen, 1985. Vet. Q. 7: 225-228.
12. Twedt
and
Monnet, 2005. Veterinary
Endoscopy for the Small Animal Practitioner.
Elsevier Saunders. 357-385.
O30