REPORT OF LALRINHLUI HAHA

Under the guidance of Sh. Lalnunpuia,

Advocate and Smt. Vanlalhruaii, Advocate, I
have done my internship during the period
from 28th June to 14th July 2010.

28th June 2010 (Monday): Drafting

a
Representation regarding consideration
of claim for
release of pension and other
retrial benefits in accordance
with the observation made by
the Honble Guwahati High
Court in its Judgement and
Order Date.4.6.2010 passes in
WP (C) No.4288/04 addressed
to the
Commissioner
&
Secretary to the Government of
India, Ministry of Defence on
behalf of the 2nd Assam

Regiment
Servicemen
Mizoram.

Disband
ExAssociation,

29th June 2010 (Tuesday): Filed a Defamation

case to the court of Shri. Lalbiakzama,
Subordinate District Council
Court under Case No. C.S.
Appln. No. 18/09 representing
the Defendant Lalduhawmi
Sailo against the Plaintiff
Lalzuiliana Sailo.
1st July 2010(Thursday): Name of Court:
Court of Senior Civil Judge
Case No. M.S. Appln.
No. 1/03
C. Sangkhuma Vrs - State of
Mizoram
Name
of
R.Vanlalchami

Judge:

Smt.

Counsel
for
Plaintiff
:
A.Rinliana Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: W. Sam
Joseph. , Advocate
The day
Defendants evidence.

is fixed

for

the

The Counsel for the Defendant

prayed for more time for the
submission of the Defendants
evidence.
Prayer is allowed and another
date is scheduled for the
submission of the Evidence of
the Defendant.
2nd July 2010 (Friday): Name of Court:
Court of Senior Civil Judge
Case No. C.S. Appln. No. 31/06
R.Laltawna Vrs State of
Mizoram

Name
of
Judge:
Smt.
R.Vanlalchami
Counsel
for
Plaintiff:
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: W. Sam
Joseph. , Advocate
Both the parties are present
through their respective Counsel.
The date is fixed for the Cross
Examination of the Plaintiff.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff was
cross examined by the Counsel
for the Defendant and was again
re-examined by the Plaintiffs
Counsel. The Counsel for the
Plaintiff closed their evidence at
this stage.
The next court was fixed for the
submission of the Defendants
evidence.

5th July 2010

: Name of the Court:
Additional District & Session Judge
(Monday)
Case No. Exe.9/01
Nauraj Kumar Vrs
Ganesh Chhetri
Name of Judge: Smt. Lucy
Lalrinthari
Counsel
for
Plaintiff:
Lalnunpuia , Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: W.
Sam Joseph. , Advocate
Court procedure starts at 10:30
am.
Both parties are present through
their respective Counsels.
Today is fixed for the
submission of Written Objection
by
the
opposite
party.
Accordingly, the Counsel for the
Defendant
submitted
their
Written Objection, and the same

is furnished to the Petitioner

wherein it was stated that the
suit is not maintainable in its
present form and style and as
such the suit is liable to be
dismissed outright.
After perusal of the available
materials on records and
submission made by the
Counsel for the Petitioner it was
held the suit is liable to be
proceeded and fix the next court
date for the framing of issue.
6th July 2010 (Tuesday):
Name of Court:
Subordinate District Council Court
Case No. Criminal Complaint
No.30/09 U/S 125 of CrPC
Vanlalzawni Vrs
C.Liantluanga
Name
Liansangzuala

of

Judge:

Counsel
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

for

Claimant:

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: Nil
The Claimant is present with her
Counsel while the Defendant is
present in person.
Today is fixed for the Plaintiffs
evidence.
Accordingly, the Plaintiffs
witness No.3 was brought
forward and submitted her
evidence through her Counsel
by way of Examination in
Chief on Affidavit under Order
XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22 of
2002) in which she made her
deposition about her knowledge
of the claimant, her relation with
her and all the matters in

connection with the case within

her knowledge.
Plaintiffs Witness No.3 was
cross examined by the opposite
party and was re examined by
the Counsel for the Claimant.
As the Claimant has no other
witness, the Counsel for the
Claimant closed the evidence.
Next court date is fixed for the
submission of the opposite
partys witness.
7th July 2010
:
Name of Court:
Subordinate District Council Court
(Wednesday)
Case
No.
C.M.
Appln. No.5/09
Laldingliana Vrs
Laldingngheti
Trial
Magistrate:
Sh.
Lalbiakzama
Counsel
for
Plaintiff:
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant:
Lalnunpuia. , Advocate
Today is fixed for Pre
Hearing. However due to the
absence of the Defendant
Laldingngheti
due
to
unavoidable circumstances, the
court is adjourned and the PreHearing is rescheduled for
another later date.
8h July 2010 (Thursday):
Name of Court:
Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class
Bail Petition Crl. No. 18/09
Lalthavunga Vrs
State of Mizoram
Trial
Magistrate:
Liansangzuala
Counsel for Defendant :
L.H.Lianhrima , Advocate
Counsel
for
Petitioner:
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
.
The accused was arrested on
17.7.2009 under Section 8 (1) of
Mizoram
Liquor
Total
Prohibition Act, 1995. Today is
fixed for Bail Hearing
The Counsel for the Petitioner
submitted that the accused is a
first time offender and have no
previous convictions or criminal
case pending against him and he
further stated that he is the sole
bread winner of his family
looking after his old aged
parents, his wife and one minor
child.
He also stated that the accused
was arrested by the Excise
Personnel without any civilian
witness thereby violating the
provisions of Sec- 100 of the
Cr.PC.

As such the Counsel for the

Petitioner pray for the release of
the accused on bail with the
condition that the accused will
be present in court regularly as
and whenever required by the
court.
The Counsel for the Defendant
strongly opposes the release of
the accused on bail at this initial
stage as there is fear of
absconding at the time of trial
during his release on bail.
After hearing both the parties,
the Magistrate issues an order
for the release of the accused on
bail with reliable surety upon
the payment of bail amount of
Rs. 3000/- (Rupees three
thousand) only.

The next court date is fixed for

the personal appearance of the
accused in court.
9th July 2010
: 1. Name of the Court:
Subordinate District Council Court
(Friday)
Case No. H.C. Appln.
No. 469/99
Lallunghnema Vrs
Lalthangfala
Trial

Magistrate:

Lalbiakzama
Counsel
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

for

Plaintiff

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: W.
Sam Joseph, Advocate
Court procedure starts at 10:30
am.

Today is fixed for submission of

Written Argument.
Accordingly,
the
Written
Argument is submitted by both
the parties.
Another date is scheduled for
Judgment and Order.
2. Name of the Court:
Subordinate District Council
Court
Case No. C.S. Appln. No.1/01
L.T.Kima Vrs State
of Mizoram
Trial
Magistrate:
Liansangzuala
Counsel
for
Plaintiff:
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate
A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate

Counsel for Defendant: L.H

Lianhrima, Advocate
Court procedure starts at 10:30
am.
Today is fixed
Examination of the Plaintiff.

for

Cross

Accordingly, the Plaintiff was

cross
examined
by
the
Defendants Counsel and was
re-examined by the Counsel of
the Plaintiff.
The Counsel of the Plaintiff
closed the Plaintiffs evidence.
12th July 2010
: 1. Name of the Court:
Court of Senior Civil Judge
(Monday)
Case No. T.S. 11/07
C.Zirkunga Vrs State of
Mizoram

Name of Judge:
R.
Vanlalchami
Counsel for Plaintiff :
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate
A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant : T.
Guite, Advocate
Today is fixed for Plaintiffs
evidence.
Accordingly, the Examination
in chief of the Plaintiffs
Evidence on Affidavit under
Order XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22
of 2002).
Next Court date was fixed for
the cross examination of
Plaintiff.
2. Name of Court: Subordinate
District Council Court

Case No. H.C. Appln. No.8/08

Lalvena Hnamte Vrs
Lalhmingthangi
Trial

Magistrate:

Lalbiakzama
Counsel
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

for

Plaintiff

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant: W.
Sam Joseph , Advocate
Today is fixed for Plaintiff
Evidence.
Accordingly, the evidence of the
witness of the Plaintiff is
submitted
by
way
of
Examination in Chief on
Affidavit under Order XVIII
Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002).
The Plaintiffs witness is cross
examined by the Defendants

Counsel regarding his relation to

the plaintiff and his knowledge
about all the events and
situations that have made up the
case so far. All the answers of
the witness are carefully noted
and recorded by the examining
Counsel.
The next court date is scheduled
for the further production of the
Plaintiffs witness before the
court.

13th July 2010 : Name of Court: Subordinate

District Council Court
(Tuesday)
Case No. M.S. Appln. No.
11/08
Lalrinliana

Vrs

Lalrinngaii
Trial
Magistrate:
Lalbiakzama
Counsel for Plaintiff :
L.H.Lianhrima , Advocate
Counsel for Defendant:
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate
A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
The day is fixed for the Cross
examination of the Plaintiffs
witness No.2.
Accordingly the Plaintiffs
witness No.2 is cross examined
by the Counsel for the
Defendant. The witness No.2 is

the wife of the Plaintiff who is

the holder of the LSC in dispute.
The Witness
No.2 was
questioned as to whether she
had given the Plaintiff the power
of attorney or authority to use
the LSC or to file the present
suit.
The witness No.2 was not reexamined by the Counsel for the
Defendant. The next court date
was fixed for the further
production of the Plaintiffs
witness before the court.

Name of the Court: Subordinate

District Council Court
Case No. M.S. Appln. No.
16/08
F. Sangzuala Vrs Lalneihkimi

Trial
Lalbiakzama
Counsel for
C.Lalramzauva , Advocate

Magistrate:
Plaintiff

A.Rinliana
Malhotra, Advocate
Counsel for Defendant:
Lalramenga, Advocate
Both the parties are present
through their respective Counsel.
The day is fixed
production of the Plaintiffs witness.

for

the

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs

witness No. 4 submitted his
Examination
in-chief
on
Affidavit under Order XVIII
Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002).
And is being cross examined by
the Counsel for the Defendant
on the same day.

The Counsel for the Plaintiff

closed the witness and as such
the next court date is fixed for
the Defendants evidence after
which the next stage would be
the Final Hearing of the case.

14th July 2010 : Name of Court: Subordinate

District Council Court
(Wednesday)
Case
No.
M.S.
Appln. No. 10/09
Vanlalhriata Vrs
Lalhmuna
Thankima
Malsawma
Liansanga
Lalfela
Sailo
Trial

Magistrate:

Lalbiakzama
Counsel for the Plaintiff:
Lalhriatpuia, Advocate

Counsel for the Defendant:

T.J. Lalnuntluanga, Advocate
Both the parties are present
through
their
respective
Counsels.
Today is fixed for the framing of
the issues of the case.
Accordingly the issues of the
case are framed as under:
1. Whether the present suit is
maintainable in a court of law
or not?
2. Whether the Plaintiffs and
Defendants are entitled to get
the relief claimed and if so, up
to what extent?
3. Whether the Plaintiffs have
a right to file this present suit?

Next court date is fixed for the

Preliminary Hearing of the trial.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This

is

to

certify

that

Smt.

Chawngdingpuii Chawngthu, a student of JSS

Law College, Mysore underwent internship
under my guidance for the period between 28th
June to 14th July 2010. Her performance
during

the

satisfactory .

period

of

internship

was

Date: 15th July 2010

Place: Aizawl, Mizoram