Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Let us begin our analysis with the general effect of an excise tax. We begin with an
initial, pre- tax equilibrium at Po and Qo. As mentioned, the effect of the tax is to drive
a wedge between what the consumer pays for the good (P c) and what the producer
receives (Pp). The graphical consequences as shown in Figure 4-6, where the supply
curve shifts inward by the amount of the tax. As the graph shows, due to the tax the
price paid by consumers exceeds the price received by producers, the difference being
the amount of the tax.
the
good.
with
paid
before
differences in prices received after (Pp) and before (P0) the tax, times the new level of
consumption, Q1. The amount of tax received by the government equal the consumers
plus the producers shares of the price wedge caused by the tax times the new level of
consumption, Q1.
To complete our story, there is also what is known as a deadweight loss due to
taxation, illustrated by the decrease in output from Q o to Q1. The deadweight loss is the
reduction in economic activity, or output, due to the tax. Specifically, the deadweight
loss is the shaded triangular area bounded by the original point of price and output
equilibrium before the tax (Po, Qo) and the new prices paid by the consumer (P c) and
received (Pp) by the producer.
In contrast to a good with an inelastic price elasticity of demand, we compare tax
incidence for a good which has a relatively price elastic demand such as satellite
dishes used for receiving television stations. In areas with a developed coaxial cable
infrastructure, the majority of the United States for example, demand for satellite
dishes is fairly elastic, since the consumer has the alternative of relatively low priced
cable hookup. We would expect any increase in the price of the dish to reduce demand
significantly. Similarly, a reduction in the price of a dish, especially the smaller dish
(Direct TV, etc.), leads to gains in demand.
For a similar story, consider the VCR (video cassette recorder). Introduced in the early
1980s, the original VCR's were very expensive, costing close to a $1,000 for a
machine that would be considered ancient in comparison to today's cheapest models.
As a consequence of the high price, demand was low. As prices fell continuously
during the 1980s, demand soared, making the VCR as common as the television in
people's homes. Over the next few years, as the price of small satellite dishes fall, we
can expect the cable companies that only recently monopolized the cable market, to
experience intense competition, as dish sales experience tremendous growth.
Figure 4-8 illustrates a relatively elastic demand curve and the impact of a tax
imposed on satellite dishes at the time of sale (holding the price elasticity of supply
constant from the previous graph). As you already understand, the tax causes the
supply curve for satellite dishes to shift leftward, creating a gap between the price
paid by consumers for the dish and the price received by producers for the same item.
To measure the area of tax paid by the consumer, we take the differences in prices
paid after (Pc) and before (Po) the tax, times the new level of consumption, Q 1. The
producers allocation to the tax is measured by the differences in prices received after
(Pp) and before (Po) the tax, times the new level of consumption, Q 1. The amount of tax
received by the government equal the consumers plus the producers shares of the
price wedge caused by the tax times the new level of consumption, Q 1. The
deadweight loss is the shaded triangular area bounded by the original point of price
and output equilibrium before the tax (Po, Qo) and the new prices paid by the consumer
and received by the producer. Since demand for satellite dishes is relatively elastic,
you will notice that the majority of the tax is absorbed by the producer and a smaller
portion by the consumer.
For our analysis we can make several
conclusions about the incidence of taxation
and the elasticity of demand for the good
being taxed:
For goods with a relatively
inelastic demand, the reduction
in demand caused by a tax is
minor, and the greater burden of
the tax will fall on the consumer.
Because the response in demand
is small, governments favor
taxing goods with an inelastic demand, in order to maximize tax
revenues.
For goods with a relatively elastic demand, the reduction in demand
caused by a tax is significant, and the greater burden of the tax will fall
on the producer. While governments will imposeluxury taxes, since the
associated demand is relatively elastic, these types of taxes are often less
effective in raising substantial revenues, but they help to confer a sense
of fairness to the taxpayer.
The last point made above is an important one. Point-of-sale taxes such as excise
taxes on cigarettes, gasoline and alcohol are considered regressive. A regressive tax
places a greater burden on consumers as their income declines, since a greater
percentage of their disposable income is spent on these goods. This is not to say that
as our incomes fall, we smoke, drink and drive more, but that a greater portion of our
income is absorbed on the consumption of these goods in comparison to a wealthy
individual who may consume equal quantities of these goods. As a consumer's income
increases their tax burden for these goods falls as they spend a smaller share of their
disposable income for the consumption of these goods. In conclusion, while taxes on
luxury items such as yachts, jewelry, and extravagant automobiles do not raise
substantial sums of money, the tax system takes on a greater aura of fairness. (4).
(4) We will not explicitly cover the incidence of taxation for different price
elasticity's of supply, holding the elasticity of the demand curve constant. If
you are interested, use a similar graphical analysis to find the following
conclusion: As the relative price elasticity of the supply curve falls (becomes
more inelastic), the producer's tax burden increases relative to the
consumer's.