Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHILLER-COMPRESSOR SELECTION
Stephen W. Duda, PE
LEED AP
Director, Mech Engineering
Ross & Baruzzini, Inc.
sduda@rossbar.com
St. Louis, MO
Indianapolis, IN
Miami, FL
THE PREMISE
AVAILABILITY
Approximate Liquid Chiller Availability
Range by Compressor Type
Centrifugal
Screw
Scroll
Reciprocating
10
100
1000
(3.5 kW)
(35 kW)
(350 kW)
(3500 kW)
10000
AVAILABILITY
Above approximately 800 tons (2800 kW), centrifugal
chillers are the only option in a single machine selection.
While at least one manufacturer markets a centrifugal
chiller down to 125 tons (440 kW), many say that 200 to
250 tons (700 to 880 kW) is the practical lower limit for
centrifugal machines.
The chiller sales representatives interviewed for this
seminar tend to recommend against reciprocating
compressors in favor of scroll compressors.
For the purpose of this seminar, a water-cooled chiller
selection of about 240 tons (844 kW) will be followed for
comparison of options.
NOISE
Sound pressure levels for centrifugals, scrolls, and screw
machines are comparable.
The presenter found a greater variation in sound pressure
levels between manufacturers than between compressor
types within a manufacturer.
Centrifugal chiller noise is somewhat speed dependent
(some gear-drive machines rotate at a very high rpm).
The typical screw chiller has a pure tone noise that some
may find bothersome, particularly if located near occupied
spaces or sleeping quarters.
WEIGHT
240-ton (844 kW) Screw Chiller typical operating weight
range 13,000 to 16,000 lbs (6,000 to 7,200 kg).
240-ton (844 kW) Centrifugal Chiller typical operating
weight range 11,000 to 20,000 lbs (5,000 to 9,100 kg).
A pair of 120-ton (422 kW) Scroll Chillers net typical
operating weight is 10,000 to 12,000 lbs (4,500 to 5,400 kg).
The more efficient chillers often weigh more, due to
extended shell and tube length.
Weight may be a consideration if located on an upper
floor of a building, especially in a retrofit case.
FOOTPRINT
A screw chiller appears to require 5% to 20% less floor
space than a comparable centrifugal chiller.
Among centrifugal chillers, a greater variation in floor
space consumed is found between manufacturers -- This
is related to speed of rotation of the compressors impeller
as slower compressors are larger in diameter.
Many scroll chillers have the advantage of fitting through
a 3-foot (1 m) door. However, capacity limitations often
require multiple scroll machines where a single screw or
centrifugal could be applied, resulting in greater net floor
space consumed.
ENERGY CONSUMPTION
240-ton Screw Chiller typical energy performance range is
0.61 to 0.68 kW/ton peak and 0.52 to 0.56 kW/ton IPLV.
844-kW Screw Chiller typical energy performance range is
5.1 to 5.8 COP peak and 6.2 to 6.8 COP IPLV.
ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Previous figures do not include the impact of a Variable
Frequency Drive (VFD).
Remember to consider differences in pumping energy
and/or cooling tower energy.
Energy performance often sets centrifugal chillers apart
from the other compressor technologies.
Some chillers are more efficient at peak load, while others
perform better at part load, so an accurate load model is
necessary to make a fully informed choice.
REFRIGERANT CONSIDERATIONS
Screw chillers historically used R-22 and are now
primarily available with R-134a.
Centrifugal chillers are available with R-134a or R-123.
Scroll compressors historically used R-22 and are now
coming out in R-407C or R-410A.
PRICE
240-ton (844 kW) Screw Chiller typical budget price range
$70,000 to $75,000.
240-ton (844 kW) Centrifugal Chiller typical budget price
range $107,000 to $130,000.
A pair of 120-ton (422 kW) Scroll Chillers typical budget
price range $65,000 to $75,000 (installation additional).
Higher first cost of centrifugal machines may be offset in
the long term by lower energy consumption, leading to a
Life Cycle Cost analysis . . .
where
P is present value
F is future value
P = F (1 / (1 + i)n))
P = A (((1 + i)n -1) / ( i (1 + i)n))
n is number of years
THANK YOU
Questions?