Professional Documents
Culture Documents
he iron milk medium (IMM) method (1, 2) was developed to circumvent problems caused by using plate media that contain inhibitory agents and to avoid laborious,
costly, and time-consuming preparations of plates (36).
AOAC Official Method 976.30 for enumeration of C. perfringens is a plating method using tryptosesulfitecycloserine
(TSC) medium (6) and requires selection of a representative
number of colonies for isolation followed by biochemical test-
Method
In AOAC Official Method 976.30 (13) a 50 g sample is
transferred to a sterile blender container. A total of 450 mL peptone water is added and homogenized 2 min at low speed (13
000 rpm). Serial dilutions are prepared and then plated on TSC
agar using either pouring or spreading techniques. Typical
colonies are picked and Gram stained. Sporeforming bacilli
that reduce nitrates to nitrites, produce acid and gas from lactose, and liquefy gelatin are provisionally identified as C. perfringens. Suspect colonies not meeting the above criteria must
be confirmed by determination of acid and gas from salicin and
raffinose. Salicin is usually not fermented (a few strains produce acid), and acid is usually produced from raffinose.
As an alternative to the AOAC procedure, a rapid screening
procedure based on the stormy fermentation of IMM was
tested. The fermentation is characterized by the rapid coagulation of milk followed by the fracturing of the curd into a spongy
mass which usually rises above the medium surface. The IMM
method is based on the most probable number (MPN) technique using iron milk as the enrichment medium. Tubes exhibiting stormy fermentation are streaked to a modified Clostridium perfringens medium (mCP) for confirmation.
Other related C. perfringens-like species (C. paraperfringens, C. barati, C. abonsum, and C. perenne) grow on mCP at
45C and have the ability to cleave phosphate from phenolphthalein diphosphate, but fail to produce rapid stormy fermentation in IMM within 1618 h. Cultures exhibiting a positive
stormy fermentation reaction and a positive phosphatase test on
mCP agar are considered C. perfringens (Figure 1).
Study Design
Statistical Analysis
The quality of the method depends on its repeatability and
reproducibility (14). The repeatability of the method refers to
how well any laboratory can get the same answer or nearly the
same answer upon replication. The reproducibility refers to
how well different laboratories can match their respective estimates to one another.
The relative standard deviations for both methods and difference between the concentration estimates were calculated.
Bacterial counts were converted to logarithms.
993.10 Clostridium perfringens from
ShellfishIron Milk Medium Method
First Action 1993
(Applicable to determination of 103106 Clostridium perfringens cells/g shellfish)
(Caution: Ammonium hydroxide may be fatal if inhaled or
ingested; vapors are extremely irritating. Avoid contact with
eyes, skin, or clothing. Use only with adequate ventilation,
preferably in fume hood.)
Method Performance
Oysters, 103 C. perfringens cells/g shellfish
Log average, 3.76
sr = 0.18; sR = 0.46; RSDr = 4.9%; RSDR = 12.2%
Oysters, 104 C. perfringens cells/g shellfish
Log average, 4.61
sr = 0.30; sR = 0.33; RSDr = 6.6%; RSDR = 7.2%
Oysters, 106 C. perfringens cells/g shellfish
Log average, 5.59
sr = 0.29; sR = 0.31; RSDr = 5.2%; RSDR = 5.5%
A. Principle
Eleven laboratories analyzed Pacific oysters (Crassostrea
gigas) for the presence and enumeration of C. perfringens using the IMM method and the AOAC Official Method 976.30
(13). Oysters were sterilized for 15 min at 121C and artificially inoculated with C. perfringens strain FD-1 (spores and
vegetative cells) at low (1 103 colony forming units [cfu]/g),
medium (1 104 cfu/g), and high (1 106 cfu/g) levels. Negative controls (zero level) were included in analyses. Blind duplicates of each inoculum level per product were analyzed giving a total of 16 samples per laboratory.
B. Apparatus
(a) Blender.With low speed, ca 13 000 rpm.
(b) Water bath.Capable of maintaining 45 0.5.
(c) Filters.0.45 m pore size, sterile.
(d) Applicator stick.Sterile, disposable.
(e) Anaerobic jar.Equipped with N2 and CO2 generator
envelopes and catalyst.
(f) Incubator.Capable of maintaining 45 0.5.
(g) Petri plates.50 12 mm, disposable, sterile.
D. Sample Preparation
Weigh ca 50 g shellfish sample into sterile blender jar. Add
450 mL peptone diluent, C(g), to prepare 1:10 dilution sample.
Blend 90 s at low speed (ca 13 000 rpm) to minimize aeration
of homogenate.
Use 1:10 homogenate to make serial dilutions from 101 to
6
10 by transferring 10 mL each successive dilution to dilution
bottle containing 90 mL peptone diluent. Shake dilution bottle
vigorously 25 in ca 30 cm arc within 7 s before each transfer.
E. IMM Determination
Transfer 1 mL each dilution from D, in triplicate, to IMM
tubes, C(c). Incubate tubes 1618 h in 45 water bath.
Examine tubes. Tubes positive for stormy fermentation will
show medium digested to turbid, yellow fluid with great quantities of gas produced. Spongy mass of curdled milk usually
rises above medium surface.
G. MPN Determination
See 966.24 for 3 tube MPN table.
Use only tubes positive for both stormy fermentation, E, and
acid phosphatase test, F, for MPN determination.
Ref.: JAOAC 77, 351 (1994).
Results and Discussion
All collaborators submitted data for the statistical evaluation. Bacterial counts were converted to logarithms (Table 1).
Blind duplicates of each inoculum level per sample were tested.
Initially, before any statistical treatment of the data, values from
Collaborators 4 and 8 were rejected due to temperature abuse
and improper handling of samples during shipment. In these
laboratories C. perfringens used to inoculate samples grew beyond the experimental design levels. In most cases values from
9 laboratories were used for the statistical evaluation. Part of
the data from Laboratory 10 (Table 1) was excluded from the
statistical evaluation (M [IMM], Table 2) because of overgrowth of C. perfringens, caused either naturally or by
overseeding the samples. No end points (growth in all serial
dilutions in all tubes) were achieved using the IMM MPN procedure identified greater than log 6.0. Summary of results before and after outlier removal is listed in Table 2 (15).
Repeatability relative standard deviation, RSDr, and reproducibility relative standard deviation, RSDR, between the 2
methods indicated satisfactory precision. For the 3 inoculum
levels, both the within-laboratory relative standard deviation
and the among-laboratory relative standard deviation are consistently lower for the AOAC Official Method 976.30 compared with the IMM method. However, the tighter results for
the AOAC method may be due to familiarity with the method.
Relative standard deviations (the crucial parameter) for either
method are satisfactory. The IMM method showed more variability than the AOAC Official Method 976.30, but the differences between the methods were insignificant. Results in this
collaborative study showed no significant differences between
the methods for Students t-test at each inoculum level at the
5% confidence level. Inherently, the MPN techniques are less
precise than standard anaerobic total plate count methods
(ATPC), because MPN is an estimation of bacterial density, and
ATPC is an actual cfu count. Previous studies have shown comparable values of estimate of variances and percent coefficient
of variation for MPN methods (10, 12, 16). The advantages of
the IMM MPN method over the AOAC Official Method
976.30 is the rapid evaluation of C. perfringens in shellfish and
the cost-saving factor. Currently the AOAC procedure requires
the preparation of plates with an agar overlay, anaerobic incubation, isolation and biochemical identification of isolates. All
Table 1. Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens, from oysters using the tryptose sulfite cycloserine (TSC) method
(AOAC Official Method 976.30) and the iron milk method (IMM)a
Inoculation Levels
Low
Medium
Ac
Bc
High
B
Zero
Temp.,
Lab.
Cb
TSC IMM
TSC IMM
TSC IMM
TSC IMM
TSC IMM
TSC IMM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
3.8 3.2
4.0 4.0
3.9 3.6
6.0 4.9
3.9 4.0
3.6 3.6
4.1 3.6
8.8 >6.0g
3.9 4.0
4.7 5.0
3.9 3.6
3.7
3.9
3.9
6.5
3.8
2.9
3.9
8.9
3.9
4.4
3.7
4.8
5.0
5.0
6.4
4.8
4.6
4.9
8.7
4.9
7.3
4.6
4.8
4.9
4.9
7.1
4.8
4.5
5.0
8.9
4.9
6.4
4.7
5.7
5.9
5.9
8.2
5.9
5.5
5.9
8.8
5.9
6.6
5.7
5.7
6.0
5.9
f
5.9
5.4
6.1
8.9
5.8
8.3
5.6
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
5.4
5.6
16.0
28.0
15.0
17.0
10.0
28.5
20.0
21.0
11.0
3.1
3.6
3.4
6.0
4.0
3.6
3.4
>6.0
4.0
4.4
3.6
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.4
5.0
5.0
4.2
>6.0
4.8
>6.0
4.3
4.6
4.9
5.0
6.0
4.6
4.6
4.4
>6.0
5.2
>6.0
4.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
6.0
6.0
5.4
5.7
>6.0
5.7
6.0
5.4
6.0
6.0
5.4
2.4
5.7
5.4
5.7
>6.0
5.7
>6.0
5.2
TSC
IMM
3.0
2.4
TSC IMMe
5.4
5.0
Table 2. Method performance of the iron milk method (IMM) and the AOAC Official Method 976.30 (TSC) for detection
and enumeration of Clostridium perfringens in oysters
Before outlier removal
Codea
L (IMM)
L (TSC)
M (IMM)
M (TSC)
H (IMM)
H (TSC)
a
b
c
Av.b
RSDR, %
RSDr, %
Labs
Av.
RSDR, %
RSDr, %
3.7611
3.8833
4.6125
4.8188
5.5944
5.8889
4.9
5.0
6.6
1.2
5.2
1.2
12.2
9.3
7.2
3.2
5.5
4.6
9
9
8
9
9
9
3.7611
3.8786
4.6125
4.8188
5.5944
5.8889
4.9
2.3
6.6
1.2
5.2
1.2
12.2
2.7
7.2
3.2
5.5
4.6
L = low inoculum level (1 103 cfu/g); M = medium inoculum level (1 104 cfu/g); H = high inoculum level (1 106 cfu/g).
Bacterial counts converted to logarithms.
Indicates removal of outlying lab(s).
Labs
9
7
8
8
9
9
a c
Figure 1. Analytical scheme for the determination of Clostridium perfringens using the Iron Milk Method (IMM) and
the AOAC Official Method 976.30 (TSC).