Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................3
1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................4
2. APPLIED FRAGMENTATION MODELLING.............................................................4
3. FRAGMENTO A NEW FRAGMENTATION MODELLING FRAMEWORK FOR
UNDEGROUND PRODUCTION BLASTING APPLICATIONS ....................................7
4. EVALUATION OF THE SINGLE RING MODELLING COMPONENT .......................8
4.1. Model response to changes in geometry and charging conditions...................8
4.2. Fragmentation uniformity versus burden curves ............................................14
5. APPLICATION OF THE SINGLE RING MODELLING COMPONENT ....................17
5.1. Fragmentation uniformity versus burden from SLC configurations.................17
5.2. Fragmentation modelling and uniformity analysis of inclined undercut rings..17
6. CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................................................21
7. REFERENCES.......................................................................................................22
List of Figures
Figure 1. Parameters of hangingwall ring blast - base case scenario for model
evaluations....................................................................................................9
Figure 2. Uniformity index versus burden for a two hole ring blast in a simulated hard
competent rock ...........................................................................................14
Figure 3. Uniformity index versus burden curves for a range of diameters in the
simulated two-hole ring blast.........................................................................16
Figure 4. Example of design and model input parameters for the 5330 UCL, 9 hole ring
layout ..........................................................................................................16
Figure 5. Fragmentation uniformity analysis of 9-hole SLC layout..............................17
Figure 6. Drilling and charging parameters for inclined undercut rings .......................18
Figure 7. Critical burden conditions for inclined five-hole leading and lagging rings.....19
Figure 8. Fragmentation modelling of 89 mm inclined undercut ring ...........................20
Figure 9. Results of fragmentation uniformity analysis to identify critical burden ........21
List of Tables
Table 1. Sensitivity of fragmentation predictions to changes in geometry..................10
Table 2. Sensitivity of fragmentation predictions to changes in explosive charging
characteristics.............................................................................................12
Table 3 Mechanical and breakage properties for the NPM E26 Lift 2 orebody ..........18
ABSTRACT
A review of breakage and fragmentation literature has shown that only a few models have
been specifically developed for applications in underground production blasting. These
approaches, however, have applied empirical relations that do not adequately consider ring
blasting geometries, have failed to appropriately respond to changes in basic design input
parameters, and have complex input and calibration requirements.
1. INTRODUCTION
The first stage of the comminution process in metalliferous mining is the breakage and
fragmentation of the rock mass, generally by drilling and blasting. This activity may have the
greatest leverage in the efficiency of a mining operation, as the product from a blast impacts
on every downstream operation (Grant et al, 1995). In the case of underground operations,
controlling both fragmentation and the degree of blast induced damage is an important aspect
of the mine design process. Poor drilling and blasting practices - typified by excessive overbreak, dilution, oversize fragmentation, restricted access and increased local reinforcement
requirements - contribute to increased mining cycle times and costs, and can have a negative
effect on the efficiency of mining activities as a whole (Singh, 1993 and Brown et al, 1994).
Within the underground mining cycle, the influence of drilling and blasting can be significant in
the key aspects of material flow, handling and processing (Klein et al, 2003). For example,
the impact of fragmentation on flow dynamics is considered critical in sub-level caving (SLC)
operations, as flow has been shown to be directly linked to recovery (Power, 2004).
The design of underground production blasts (i.e. the ring geometries) commonly continues to
be defined by trial and error or the application of rules of thumb. With the application of
these approaches, it continues to be difficult, if not impossible, to make adequate predictions
at both the pre-feasibility and feasibility stages of a project. Hustrulid (2000) reinforces this
point by noting that, for the high levels of up-front capital expenditure, designs must function
as designed and the as-built must closely resemble the as-designed.
engineers, geologists, mine and plant managers must have access to accurate modelling and
simulation tools which can address every stage of the design process, allowing the
determination of appropriate and cost effective design parameters at the outset.
Acknowledged criticisms and limitations of the model are associated with the vibration
energy component (Kleine et al, 1990). For engineering design purposes, a less
obvious, but what can be considered to be a critical limitation of Kleines approach,
has been its reported inadequate response or sensitivity to changes in ring burden
conditions (AMIRA/JKMRC, 1993), in addition to its inability to infer critical burden
conditions.
Following Kleines development, Preston (1995) reported the implementation of a
breakage and fragmentation model for underground ring blasting applications
embedded in a 3D blast analysis package called DynACAD-3D.
Although
To enable the evaluation, validation and application of the single ring component of
FRAGMENTO, all equations and algorithms have been encoded into the JKSimBlast
underground software package.
It is beyond the scope of this paper to demonstrate every component of FRAGMENTO. The
following discussions will focus mainly on the application and evaluation of the single ring
component. For further details, including validation and demonstrations of the proposed
stochastic modelling component, the reader is referred to Onederra (2004a & 2004b).
Hole
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
16.5
17.9
19.8
22.2
24.0
25.3
22.5
20.4
16.5
15.6
14.7
14.3
14.1
14.1
14.3
15.4
17.3
19.5
21.6
20.8
20.0
19.3
18.9
18.8
19.0
19.2
20.2
14.5
10.4
17.8
12.9
22.0
15.2
20.5
11.8
14.5
9.4
12.7
8.8
12.1
8.6
12.3
9.8
15.3
11.1
19.6
11.6
18.0
10.9
16.9
10.5
17.0
10.8
18.2
24.2
31.7
38.5
44.7
50.2
55.4
60.8
66.6
73.7
81.2
89.1
97.3
105.4
113.5
121.3
129.3
136.9
144.0
150.3
156.4
162.7
169.3
175.9
182.8
189.5
196.0
202.7
Design
Hole diameter
(mm)
Explosive
Density
(g/cc
Toe spacing
(m)
Burden
(m)
89 & 102
emulsion
1.0 1.2
2.5
1.8 3.2
UCS (MPa)
100
500
Ts (MPa)
10
0.9
Vp (m/s)
4800
> 4000
Vs (m/s)
2450
Ed (GPa)
40
3
density (kg/m )
2500
0.5
In this case, 102 mm blastholes were used with all other parameters kept constant. The
analysis considered burdens ranging from 1.8 m to 3.2 m, with calculations conducted
every 0.2 m. Modelling results show that fragmentation is logically expected to improve as
nominal burden decreases. Considering the 2.4 m burden as the benchmark, the analysis
indicates that a decrease in burden of 0.4 m would bring about reductions of the order of
12% in the 50%, 80% and 90% passing fractions (i.e. P50, P80 and P90 values). A similar
increase in burden (i.e. to 2.8 m) would increase P50, P80 and P90 values by 11.3%,
12.2% and 12.6% respectively, suggesting a worsening in the expected drawpoint
fragmentation.
10
In this case, the fragmentation output of a modified 24 hole pattern with an average toe
spacing of 2.8 m was compared against the nominal 27 hole layout with an average toe
spacing of 2.5 m. Analysis was also carried out for burdens ranging from 1.8 to 3.2 m, with
all other parameters kept constant. Modelling results adequately show that an improved
fragmentation outcome would be achieved with the use of a 27-hole ring layout. The model
suggests that an increase in average toe spacing of 0.3 m may bring a relative increase in
the size of fragments across the complete distribution of fragments expected to report to
drawpoints. In the case of fines defined by the 10% and 20% passing fractions (i.e. P10
and P20 values), the increase would be of the order of 51.1% and 34.3%. In the
intermediate to coarse end the increase in the P50, P80 and P90 values would be of the
order of 12.4%, 12.7% and 12.8% respectively. As shown, the relative differences in the
intermediate to coarse end appeared to be constant across the full range of burdens.
11
In this case, 89 mm blastholes were used at a fixed nominal burden of 2.4 m. The charging
layout was kept constant with analyses conducted at densities of 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 g/cc.
Modelling results show improvements in fragmentation as explosive density is increased.
Considering the 1.0 g/cc charge density as the benchmark, an increase to 1.2 g/cc may
bring reductions in the P50, P80 and P90 values of the order of 14.1%, 17.4% and 18.8%
respectively. A noticeable impact is also suggested by the model at the finer end, with
reductions in the P10 and P20 values reaching 42.3% and 32.4% respectively.
12
In this case, 89 mm blastholes were used and analyses conducted for burdens ranging
from 1.8 to 3.2 m. In the dual density charging case, the column charge consisted of a fixed
6 m toe charge with a density of 1.2 g/cc, with the remaining charge lengths maintained at a
density of 1.0 g/cc. Modelling results show that higher toe densities would tend to improve
fragmentation. Results for the 2.0 m burden configuration suggest reductions in the P10,
P20, P50, P80 and P90 values of the order of 32.4%, 24.4%, 10.5%, 11.2% and 11.4%
respectively. As shown, for burdens greater than 2.8 m, the relative difference in coarse
fragmentation outcomes given by P80 and P90 values appears to shift. This indicates a
less pronounced impact of higher toe density charges on coarse fragmentation results, as
critical burden conditions are being reached.
13
This output
corresponds to a simple two-hole ring blast consisting of two 89 mm, 15 m long holes with a
constant spacing of 3 m. Drillholes were charged with 13 m of emulsion at a density of
1.25 g/cc. PPV attenuation and breakage modelling parameters to simulate blasting in a hard
competent ore were assumed to be K= 500, = 0.9 and PPV breakage = 4500 mm/s.
1.10
Uniform breakage zone
Transitional
Zone
1.00
0.90
Reference point
n ref
0.70
nB
0.60
0.50
0.80
n max
89 mm
0.40
0.2
0.7
1.2
1.7
2.2
2.7
3.2
3.7
4.2
4.7
Burden (m)
Figure 2. Uniformity index versus burden curve for a two hole ring blast
in a simulated hard competent rock (89 mm blastholes)
Figure 2 shows that independent of the absolute values and the degree of variability in
fragmentation uniformity, there are three unique features. Point A indicates a maximum value
of uniformity for a specific burden, in this case approximately 1.5 m; point B identifies a lower
inflection point at a larger burden (i.e. 3.6 m); and point C is defined by the intersection
between the line of maximum uniformity and the slope of the region of the curve in which
uniformity begins to change rapidly. Point C defines the boundary at which the uniformity of
the distribution of fragments begins to be affected by small variations in burden and
therefore becomes significantly bi-modal. This point defines a critical burden boundary for the
two hole ring layout, identified at approximately 2.3 m.
14
determination of the critical burden boundary also allows for the definition of three practical
breakage zones:
The first zone is the uniform breakage zone which identifies burden conditions at which
efficient breakage and fragmentation are expected to occur. In the simulated 89 mm case,
this corresponds to burdens of less than 1.5 m.
The second zone is defined as the transition zone, it lies between the maximum attainable
uniformity (point A) and the critical burden boundary (point C). This zone identifies burdens at
which breakage is expected to occur and thus provides a way of defining a practical design
burden (i.e. point D). In the proposed approach, this is defined as the mid point between A
and C. For the simulated 89 mm case, the practical design burden corresponds to 1.9 m. In
terms of cost savings, if fragmentation is not the principal design criteria, there is a clear
advantage in choosing burdens within the region bounded by the practical design burden and
the critical burden (e.g. in the range of 1.9 m to 2.3 m for the simulated 89 mm case).,
However, the likelihood of poor breakage is expected to increase as the chosen burden
approaches the critical boundary. Good quality control procedures are essential in this zone
to minimise the risk of poor breakage or freezing of the blast.
The third zone is the non-uniform breakage zone which identifies burden distances in which
poor breakage and fragmentation is expected to occur and where the likelihood of freezing
increases. In the simulated 89 mm case, the boundary is identified at burdens greater than
2.3 m. Point B lies well inside this zone and can be identified as a point in which inadequate
breakage is almost certain. Fragmentation predictions beyond this point may be considered
irrelevant.
For a given ring design layout, this simple analysis can be used as a first approximation
to define the range of burdens that would allow for effective breakage and fragmentation.
To further evaluate the applicability of these curves, overall critical burden conditions for
diameters ranging from 64 mm to 127 mm were also calculated with FRAGMENTO and
the results summarised in Figure 3. As shown, a logical reduction in critical burden
conditions is calculated as blasthole diameters are reduced and charging conditions
maintained.
15
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
127 mm
115 mm
102 mm
89 mm
0.6
76 mm
0.4
64 mm
0.2
0
0
Burden (m)
Model output
Figure 3. Uniformity index versus burden curves for the simulated two hole ring
blast with various blasthole diameters
Figure 4. Example of design and model input parameters for the 5330 UCL, 9 hole
ring layout
16
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.90
1.10
0.40
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Burden (m)
102 mm
Critical point
17
for the effective extraction of a narrow inclined and advanced undercut. This section
describes the initial evaluation of parameters supported with the application of the proposed
fragmentation uniformity analysis curves. Figure 6 describes the parameters of the originally
proposed five hole layout.
Table 3 Mechanical and breakage properties for the NPM E26 Lift 2 orebody
Rock material properties
UCS (MPa)
180
500
Ts (Mpa)
14
0.9
Vp (m/s)
5300
> 4000
Vs (m/s)
2900
Ed (GPa)
58
3
density (kg/m )
2680
18
0.5
Achieving complete breakage is the single most important criteria in the evaluation of drilling
and blasting parameters for undercut blasting. As shown in Figure 7, modelling results for
the proposed five-hole leading ring indicate the critical burden boundary to be
approximately 2.4 m. Burdens in the estimated transition zone ranged from 1.8 to 2.4 m.
The evaluation criteria dictated that ring burdens be less than 2.4 m.
As with
experiences in confined SLC blasting conditions, burdens within the transition zone can be
sufficient to achieve breakage, however quality control procedures must be implemented at
all times. Given that possible deviations from as designed can occur in practice, it was
1.03
0.83
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Burden (m)
Model output
Critical point
19
800
5 hole leading ring
89 mm - Emulsion 1.0 g/cc
700
Size (mm)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
2.4
Burden (m)
P50
P80
P90
20
1.2
3 hole inclined leading ring
89 mm - Emulsion 1.0 g/cc
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Burden used
0.9
1
Practical design burden (4500 mm/s - model)
1.1
0.4
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Burden (m)
Model Output (4000 mm/s)
Model Output (4500 mm/s)
6. CONCLUSIONS
Very little emphasis has been placed in the development of accessible fragmentation
modelling frameworks that can be directly applied to underground production blasting
environments. The few that have been developed have applied empirical relations that do not
adequately consider ring blasting geometries, have failed to appropriately respond to changes
in basic design input parameters, and have complex input and calibration requirements. This
justified the development of an fragmentation modelling framework specific to underground,
addressing the following key requirements:
ability to predict breakage conditions and the full range of fragmentation expected to
report to drawpoints from knowledge of nominal blast design parameters and rock
mass characteristics;
ability to simulate the likely impact on fragmentation by other key external factors such
as drilling quality or overall ring detonation performance;
21
7. REFERENCES
Adamson, W R and Lund, A S, 2001. On the use of mechanistic blast-outcome
measurement and modelling for optimisation of explosive selection in underground
mining. Proceedings of EXPLO 2001, NSW, Australia. The Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy, 207-223.
AMIRA/JKMRC, 1993. Advanced Blasting Technology P93E (1990-1993).
Report. JKMRC, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Final
Bergmann, O R, Riggle, J W and Wu, F C, 1973. Model rock blasting: Effect of explosives
22
properties and other variables on blasting results. Int J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and
Geomech Abstr., 10: 585-612.
Brown, E T, Chitombo, G P, Li, T and Walker, P A, 1994. Rock Mass Damage in
Underground Metalliferous Mines. The 1994 ISRM International Symposium. Integral
Approach to Applied Rock Mechanics, Santiago , Chile, M. Van Sint Jan (Ed.), Volume
I: 289-301.
Chitombo, G P and Kleine, T H, 1987. An engineered blast design philosophy for open
stoping operations - A case study at Brunswick Mining and Smelting No. 12 Mine,
Canada. Second international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting, Keystone,
Colorado, Society for experimental mechanics, 657-671.
Cundall, P, Ruest, M, Chitombo, G, Esen, S and Cunningham, C, 2001. The Hybrid
Stress Blasting Model: A Feasibility Study. Confidential report. JKMRC, ITASCA and
AEL.
Cunningham, C V B, 1987. Fragmentation estimations and the Kuz-Ram model - Four
years on. Proceedings of the second international symposium on rock fragmentation
by blasting, Keystone, Colorado, 475-487.
Dawes, J J, 1986. The study of blast performance and design in mining via the analysis of
ground vibrations. PhD. Thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.
Gaidukov, E and Myzdrikov, Y, 1974. Zones of crushing in rock blasting. Soviet Mining
Science, 10: 681-684.
Grant, J R, Little, T N and Bettess, D, 1995. Blast driven mine optimisation. Proceedings
of EXPLO 95, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane, Australia,
3-10.
Hustrulid, W, 2000. Method selection for large-scale underground mining. Proceedings
of MassMin 2000, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane,
Australia, 29-56.
Kanchibotla, S S, Valery, W and Morrell, S, 1999. Modelling fines in blast fragmentation
and its impact on crushing and grinding. Proceedings of Explo 99. The Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Kalgoorlie, Australia, 137-144.
Kirby, I J, Harries, G H and Tidman, J P, 1987. ICI's computer blasting model
SABREX - Basic principles and capabilities. Proceedings of the 13th conference on
explosives and blasting technique, SEE, Annual meeting, Miami Florida, 184-194
Klein, B, Hall, R, Scoble, M and Morin, M, 2003. Total systems approach to design for
underground mine-mill integration. CIM Bulletin, 96, No1067: 65-71.
Kleine, T, 1988. A mathematical model of rock breakage by blasting. PhD Thesis. The
University of Queensland, Australia.
Kleine, T, Cocker, A and Kavetsky, A, 1990. The development and implementation of a
three dimensional model of blast fragmentation and damage. Proceedings of the third
international symposium of rock fragmentation by blasting. The Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane, Australia, 181-187.
23
Kuznetsov, V M, 1973. The mean diameter of fragments formed by blasting rock. Soviet
Mining Science, 9: 144148.
Onederra, I, 2001a. Development of an empirical fragmentation model for underground
ring blasting applications. JKMRC/AMIRA Report, Submitted to BART II - P447
Project sponsors, August, Australia
Onederra, I, 2001b. Near Field Vibration Monitoring of SLC Ring blasting in XC11 of the
5305 level undercut. JKMRC-BARTII Project Report submitted to Newcrest Ridgeway,
November.
Onederra, I, 2004a. A fragmentation model for underground production blasting. PhD
Thesis. The University of Queensland, Australia.
Onederra, I, 2004b. Modelling fragmentation in underground production blasting.
Proceedings of the Massmin 2004 International Conference, Santiago, Chile, 365-370.
Power, G, 2004. Modelling granular flow in caving mines - Numerical modelling
validated through large scale physical modelling and full scale experiments. PhD
Thesis. The University of Queensland, Australia.
Preston, C, 1995. 3D Blast design for ring blasting in underground mines. Proceedings
of EXPLO 95, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane, Australia,
1-12 (Late attachment).
Riihioja, K, 2004. Personal communication.
Sheikh, A M and Chung, S H, 1987. Predicting fragmentation sizing profiles for different
blasting patterns. Second international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting,
Keystone, Colorado, Fourney W L and Dick R D (Ed.), 521-530.
Silveira, A , 2004. Undercutting at E26 Lift 2 Northparkes. Proceedings of the Massmin
2004 international conference, Santiago, Chile, 410-414.
Singh, S P, 1993. Prediction and Determination of Explosive Induced Damage. Rock
Fragmentation by Blasting, Rossmanith (Ed.). Balkema, Rotterdam, 183-192
Stagg, M S, Otterness, R E and Djahanguiri, F, 1994. Prediction of blast fragmentation
of underground stopes for in situ leaching. Proceedings of the 10th annual symposium
on explosives and blasting research, Austin, Texas USA, 197-208.
Thornton, D, Kanchibotla, S and Esterle, J, 2001. A fragmentation model to estimate
ROM distribution of soft rock types. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual
Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, ISEE, Orlando, Florida, USA, 4153.
Trout, P, 2002. Production drill and blast practices at Ridgeway Gold Mine. Proceedings
of the Underground Operators' Conference, The Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy , Townsville
, Australia, 107-117.
Wedmaier, R, 1992. An investigation of failure criteria and a blast wave propagation
model for a description of the rock breakage problem. PhD Thesis, University of
Queensland, Australia.
24