Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMPLICATION TO RESERVOIR
The morphology, facies distribution and
hydrodynamics of the Mahakam Delta all suggest
that the delta is presently being transgressed and
modified by marine processes (Husein and
Lambiase, 2005). Bedload transport patterns
indicate that most, if not all, fluvially-derived
sand is being stored onshore in the distributaries,
which is a feature of transgressive systems
according to sequence stratigraphic models (e.g.
Shanley and McCabe, 1993).
In present-day setting where the fluvial sand is
deposited along the distributaries, the lateral bars
are possibly to become continuous reservoirs.
Their geometry commonly are narrow and
rectilinear belts up to 5-10 m thick and 0.5-1.0 km
wide. The range of width/thickness ratio of
individual lateral bar varies from 50 to 100 and is
quite similar to that observed in the Miocene
distributaries (Duval et al, 1992). There is also
possibility to have stacked channel sand bodies
reservoir. Prasetyo (2003) observed a 50 m thick
stacked distributaries sand bodies in the Nilam
Field at the Mahakam Delta province. It filled an
incised valley that has eroded the overlying delta
plain deposit and has a width/thickness ratio of
1:200.
The lateral bars have erosional bases which
overlay prodelta mud and exhibits laterally
accreting deposits (Allen and Chamber, 1998). A
typical succession fill is cross bedded medium
sands to flaser bedding followed by mud-sand
couplets and lenticular bedding, which reflects
gradual
changing
from
river-dominated
distributary channel sand to tide-dominated
distributary channel sand. The sand/mud ratios are
highly variable, ranging from 90:10 to 15:85,
depends on their location with respect to the bars
(Gastaldo et al., 1995). This certain amount of
small scale internal reservoir heterogeneities
could form localized permeability barriers and
result in a lower values of vertical permeability
than in the more massive and cleaner fluvialdominated sand facies. Tidal signatures also
significantly decrease reservoir quality. Trevena et
al (2003) observed in the Attaka Field at the
Mahakam Delta province that the river-dominated
distributary channel sand has average porosity 24
% and median permeability 665 md, while the
CONCLUSIONS
The main conclusions of the present study are:
1. The Mahakam Delta is indeed a mixed fluvial
and tide-dominated system but tidal processes
are the most important and control
sedimentation throughout the delta plain.
2. Tidal stratification occurs dynamically and
influences the bedload transport that
commonly takes place during spring tide but
not during neap tide, which later suggests that
the sand and mud couplets reflect spring-neap
variations.
3. The delta is being transgressed. Fluviallysupplied sand is being stored onshore in the
distributaries and is not reaching the shoreline
and rich in tidal signatures.
4. The tidal processes control the distribution of
the potential reservoir in the delta plain and
significantly decrease the reservoir quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wish to thank Total E&P Indonsie,
Total E&P Borneo BV and Universiti Brunei
Darussalam for sponsoring the research, and
Universitas Gadjah Mada for the study leave.
REFERENCES
Allen, G.P. and Chambers, J.L.C., 1998.
Sedimentation in the modern and Miocene
Mahakam
Delta.
Indonesian
Petroleum
Association, 236 pp.
Allen, G.P., Laurier, D., and Thouvenin, J.M.,
1976. Sediment distribution patterns in the
modern Mahakam Delta. Proceedings Indonesian
Petroleum Association, 5th Annual Convention,
159-178.
Brown, J., Colling, A., Park, D., Phillips, J.,
Rothery, D. and Wright, J., 1997. Waves, tides
and shallow-water processes. In: G. Bearman (ed.).
Volumes on oceanography. The Open University,
Oxford, 187 pp.
Downstream
Channel
width (m)
a1
a2
b1
900
6.46E-06 5.81E-03 9.30E-02
1000
500
1100
800
400
550
1100
b2
83.69
4.85
0.89
550
400
500
700
450
1400
700
a1
Upstream
a2
b1
2.63
27.35
Net Transport
c1
c2
9.30E-02
28,118
2.12E-12
4.82E-10
1.96E-13
1.06E-13
2.23E-11
1.14E-13
1.14E-13
2.12E-09
2.41E-07
2.15E-10
8.45E-11
8.91E-09
6.29E-11
1.26E-10
7.63E-09
8.67E-07
3.53E-10
1.9E-10
4.01E-08
2.06E-10
2.06E-10
7.63E-06
4.34E-04
3.88E-07
1.52E-07
1.60E-05
1.13E-07
2.27E-07
-7.63E-09
9.69E-03
-3.53E-10
-1.90E-10
2.24E-03
-2.06E-10
-2.06E-10
2.56E-03
1628
1.30E-04
5.11E-05
301
3.81E-05
7.61E-05
4.56E-11
2.51E-08
8.21E-08
4.52E-05 -8.21E-08
1.52E-02
1.50E-02
2.74E-06
4.97E-06 -7.10E-09
5.85E-03
4.03E-07 -2.88E-10
3.91E-02
2014
4.61E-01
1.67E-03
885
1.35E-04
9189
b2
1.97E-12
1.38E-09
7.1E-09
8E-14
1.12E-10
2.88E-10
TABLE 1: Summary of bedload transport rates. a1: rate in m3/m/s; a2: rate in m3/s and is obtained by
multiplying a1 with the channel width; b1: rate in m3/m per tidal cycle; b2: rate in m3/tidal cycle and is
obtained by multiplying b1 with the channel width; c1: net transport rate in m3/m/s (a negative sign and
light blue colour indicates upstream direction); c2: annual net transport rate in m3/year.
Station numbers refer to Figure 3 for locations.
100 km
25
5
Kutai
Lakes
Northern
area
50
10 km
e
Mahakam
Delta
Mahakam River
Drainage Basin
d
e
d
Subaqueous
delta plain
Delta plain
e
e
Central area
d
d
d
d
Delta
front
25
5
50
FIGURE 1: Location and morphology of the Mahakam Delta, showing the morphological zonations
(delta plain, subaqueous delta plain and delta front) as well as distributaries (d) and estuaries (e).
Peat beaches
Mud
Sandy mud
Fine sand
- 25 m
-5m
Medium sand
10 km
FIGURE 2: Block diagram of sedimentary facies on the Mahakam Delta. Bathymetry was compiled
from echo sounding profiles; the offshore break in slope is in approximately 5 m of water. The red dotted
line indicates the upstream limit of benthic marine organisms.
Scale
1 hour
7
2
6
10
11
14
20
12
17
13
15
16
18
22
19
21
N
10 km
FIGURE 3: Bedload transport patterns. The blue arrows indicate net downstream bedload transport and
the red arrows indicate net upstream bedload transport. Arrow length is proportional to transport duration.
Numbers in yellow circles refer to the the measurement stations in Table 1.
FIGURE 4a: Bed shear stress and current velocity profiles at the delta apex, location is Station #1 (see
Figure 3). Red box indicates bedload transport occurrence.
FIGURE 4b: Bed shear stress and current velocity profiles at the upper reaches,
location is Station #14 (see Figure 3).
FIGURE 4c: Bed shear stress and current velocity profiles at the middle reaches, location is Station #15
(see Figure 3).
FIGURE 4d: Bed shear stress and current velocity profiles at the lower reaches, location is Station #16
(see Figure 3). Note that the bedload transport (red box) also occurs during neap tide since the
measurement was done at near-neap condition or transition from spring to neap.