Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1 REED
A tall, slender-leaved plant of the grass family, which grows in water or on
marshy ground.
1.2 REED BED
Reed beds are aquatic plant based systems which allow bacteria, fungi
and algae to digest the sewage and clean the water.
Reed bed is one of the natural and cheap methods of treating domestic,
industrial and agricultural liquid wastes. Reed bed is considered as an effective
and reliable secondary and tertiary treatment method where land area is not a
major constraint.
Generally reed bed is installed with a drain pipe in a bed of pieces of lime
stones and filled up with pebbles and graded sand. In this sandy body, reed
plants generally with hollow root which bring oxygen into the filter bed are
planted. These systems use wetland plants, soils and their associated
microorganisms to remove contaminants from wastewater. Plants provide an
environment for microbes to live, they oxygenate the wastewater, providing
nutrients for the microbes to survive, they stabilize the soil and they also partake
in the reduction of nutrients.
Reed bed treatment system utilizes the active treatment capabilities of soil to
biologically treat effluents such as sewage, industrial wastewater, run-off and
leachates.
There are two types of flow in reed bed
Vertical flow
Horizontal flow
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 TREATMENT OF TOXICITY SLUDGE BY REED BED
Jiangang Li, Yubo Cui carried out a project based on Biological Toxicity of
Sewage Sludge Stabilized by Reed Bed ,College of Environment and
Resources, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China.
With the expanding scale of urban wastewater treatment, the resulting
excess sludge quantity is also growing. Excess sludge treatment and disposal
has become an important part of the sewage treatment. Sludge itself is rich in
essential nutrients of plant growth such as nitrogen and phosphorus, but it often
also contains harmful substances such as heavy metals. Tests are conducted in
this research by comparing the effects on the absorption and transformation of
toxic substances between traditional sludge drying bed and reed bed.
2.2 ENERGY EFFICIENT SLUDGE TREATMENT BY REED BED
Lakeville carried out a project based on Energy Efficient Sludge Treatment
with REED BED Technology Demonstration Project, NY, Water and Sewer
Authority, Livingston.
Reed bed technology involves the application of domestic wastewater
sludge to beds that have been planted with a specialized species of reeds Sludge
applied to reed beds is turned into a compost-like material that can be used as a
soil conditioner. Reed beds act to dewater and reduce the organic content of the
sludge, reduce the metals concentrations of the sludge, and stabilize the sludge
for subsequent disposal. This is the result of the following: first, the reed root
system provides oxygen to the sludge, which increases the activity and
population of microorganisms that mineralize the sludge; second, the growth of
the plants makes use of the nutrients, minerals, and water in the sludge.
2
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 REED BEDS WITH EMERGENT MACROPHYTES
Various emergent macrophytes species can be used in constructing
wetlands, including cattails, bulrushes, reeds, rushes. Constructed wetland for
wastewater treatment with emergent macrophytes can be constructed with
different design. In general these can be categorized into two major groups
according to their flow pattern: free water surface systems (FWS Wetlands) and
system with subsurface flow (SSF wetlands); subsurface flow wetland further
categorized into horizontal subsurface flow systems (HSSF or HF Wetlands)
and vertical subsurface flow systems (VSSF Wetlands).
3.2 DOWN FLOW OR VERTICAL FLOW (VF)
This design requires dosing of the beds surface using a network of pipes
using either a pumping or a siphon system. The idea is to flood the surface of
the reed bed a number of times per day. As the water flows down through the
bed, it draws air in, creating the right bacterial environment. VF reed beds are
very effective in removal of BOD, ammonia and some heavy metals and take up
less area for similar treatment compared to SSHF. The efficiency of SSHF and
VF reed beds may be improved by adding certain chemicals to the water during
the treatment. This dosing technique can be used for COD or phosphorous
removal in industrial process water, for example. Water can be treated
progressively through multiple reed bed stages and some or all of the above
systems can be incorporated into a complete treatment system.
O2
release
O2
to the root
O2
from
roots to the surrounding thus providing aerobic conditions for plant nitrification
to occur. A study by concluded that internal O2 movement not only supplied
to buried plant tissues but also leaked O2 into the rhizosphere. Macrophytes
can also provide habitat for flora and fauna and increase aesthetic appeal.
Research differs on the significance of plant uptake in nutrient removal with
6
10
11
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 4
STEP 5
14
15
Flow Water
Free Board
Reed and its soil (75 mm height)
Sand sieve size is about 600 , Height 75 mm
Lime 50 mm height
Fine Gravel sieve size is about 4.76 mm
& height 75mm
Coarse Gravel sieve size is about 20mm
& height 100mm
Charcoal height is about 100 mm
Treated Water
FIG 3.6g : REED BED WITH DIMENSIONS
16
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.1 COLLECTION OF WASTE WATER SAMPLES
Effluent WasteWater is collected from DAIRY INDUSTRY @
Sholinganallur.
WasteWater is collected from SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT @
Agni College Of Technology.
TSS directly. Suspended solids cause the water to be milky or muddy looking
due to the light scattering from very small particles in the water. Sometimes it is
mixed with color, but colored waters can also be clear. Normally, we notice
suspended solids before we notice anything else. Polluted waters are commonly
turbid and improvement is usually marked by greater clarity. Of course, good
and useful waters may be turbid, and many clean rivers are never clear because
they contain fine suspended minerals that never settle.
To determine total suspended solids, weigh a piece of filter paper as
accurately as possible. Filter a one liter sample of water through the weight
filter paper. Allow the filter paper to dry completely. Placing a lamp above the
filter paper may help the drying process, but take care in not getting the filter
paper too hot.
Preparation of the glass fiber filter disk Insert the filter disk onto the base
and clamp on funnel. While vacuum is applied, wash the disk with three
successive 20mL volumes of distilled water. Remove all traces of water by
continuing to apply vacuum after water has passed through. Dry in a oven at
103-105 C for one hour in china dish. When needed, remove dish from the
oven, desiccate, and weigh in dish. Re-dry and re-weigh filter until weight
change is less than 4% of previous weight or 0.5 mg. Place the filter on the base
and clamp on funnel and apply vacuum. Stir sample continuously while subsampling and quantitatively transfer the sample to the filter using a 100 mL
graduated cylinder. Remove all traces of water by continuing to apply vacuum
after sample has passed through. Carefully remove the filter from the base. Dry
at least one hour at 103-105 C. Cool in a desiccator and weigh.
Reweigh the filter paper. The change in weight is the weight of the total
suspended solids. TSS values are commonly expressed in ppm (mg solids per
liter of water). which is shown in the fig. 4.2.1.
18
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
35.210
31.170
After
Sample 1
36.170
Sample 2
33.210
Weight (g)
Paper
1.070
1.070
0.980
0.980
Weight (g)
Original
36.300
32.250
37.160
34.210
Weight (g)
Sample Sol.
100
100
100
100
(ml)
Suspended
2000
1000
100
200
Solids (mg/l)
TABLE 2 : TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS FOR STP SAMPLE
Treatment
Sample
Empty
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
33.800
36.490
After
Sample 1
34.662
Sample 2
34.664
Weight (g)
Paper
1.080
1.080
0.950
0.950
Weight (g)
Original
34.890
37.590
35.617
35.621
Weight (g)
Sample Sol.
100
100
100
100
(ml)
Suspended
100
200
50
70
Solids (mg/l)
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
19
36.30(35.211.07)
106 10
100
= 2000
Sample 2 =
mg
l
32.25(31.171.07)
10 6 10
100
= 1000
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
37.16( 36.170.98)
106
100
= 100
Sample 2 =
mg
l
34.21(33.210.98)
106
100
= 200
mg
l
Sample 1 =
34.89(33.801.08)
106
100
= 100
Sample 2 =
mg
l
37.59(36.491.08)
106
100
= 200
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
35.617( 34.6620.95)
106
100
= 50
Sample 2 =
mg
l
35.621(34.6640.95)
10 6
100
= 70
mg
l
21
4.2.2 pH-RANGE
22
with tissue paper to remove adhering substances. Potassium level in the calomel
electrode is maintained an the cap should be removed during the measurement.
For the accurate measurement of pH, the temperature of the buffer should be
maintained for the standardization of pH meter is same.
pH RANGE FOR DIARY SAMPLE
BEFORE TREATMENT
Sample 1 : 7.5
Sample 2 : 7.5
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 : 11.5
Sample 2 : 11.3
pH RANGE FOR STP SAMPLE
BEFORE TREATMENT
Sample 1 : 7.5
Sample 2 : 7.7
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 : 11.2
Sample 2 : 11.3
23
carefully measure 200 mL of sample water into each beaker. place the beakers
into the oven and allow the water to evaporate overnight at a temperature of
around 100-105C. Next day Measure the mass of the beakers and solids.
remove the beakers
from the oven and place them in a dessicator, if available, to cool. A dessicator
will keep the samples from absorbing any water from the air that would increase
their mass. If no dessicator is available, the beakers can be cooled on a table top.
Obtain the mass of the solids by subtracting the mass of the empty beaker from
the mass of the beaker with the solids.
25
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
33.92
36.53
After
Sample 1
34.24
Sample 2
36.19
Weight (g)
Original
34.05
36.65
34.23
36.18
Weight (g)
Sample Sol.
25
25
25
25
(ml)
Total Solids
5200
4800
400
400
(mg/l)
TABLE 4 : TOTAL SOLIDS FOR STP SAMPLE
Treatment
Sample
Empty
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
34.67
30.80
After
Sample 1
33.80
Sample 2
36.53
Weight (g)
Original
34.69
30.82
33.79
36.52
Weight (g)
Sample Sol.
25
25
25
25
(ml)
Total Solids
800
800
400
400
(mg/l)
TOTAL SOLIDS
26
TOTAL SOLIDS =
Sample 1 =
34.0533.92
6
10
25
= 5200
Sample 2 =
mg
l
36.6536.53
106
25
= 4800
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
34.2434.23
106
25
= 400
Sample 2 =
mg
l
36.1936.18
6
10
25
= 400
mg
l
27
Sample 1 =
34.6934.67
106
25
= 800
Sample 2 =
mg
l
30.8030.82
6
10
25
= 800
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
33.8033.79
106
25
= 400
Sample 2 =
mg
l
36.5336.52
6
10
25
= 400
mg
l
28
29
Sample 1 = 400 - 50
= 350 mg/l
Sample 2 = 400 - 70
= 330 mg/l
saline waters is required. Collect the samples in glass bottles, if possible. Use of
plastic containers is permissible if it is known that no organic contaminants are
present in the containers, Extreme care should be exercised to avoid inclusion of
organic materials in the distilled water used for reagent preparation or sample
dilution. Glassware used in the test should be conditioned by running blank
procedures to eliminate traces of organic material. Volatile materials may be lost
when the sample temperature rises during the sulfuric acid addition step. To
minimize this loss the flask should be cooled during addition of the sulfuric acid
solution. Reflux apparatus: Glassware should consist of a 500 mL Erlenmeyer
flask or a 300 mL round bottom flask made of heat-resistant glass connected to
a 12 inch Allihn condenser by means of a ground glass joint. Any equivalent
reflex apparatus may be substituted provided that a ground-glass connection is
used between the flask and the condenser. Distilled water: Special precautions
should be taken to insure that distilled water used in this test be low in organic
matter. Standard potassium dichromate solution (0.250 N): Dissolve 12.259 g K
2 Cr 2 O 7 , primary standard grade, previously dried at 103C for two hours, in
distilled water and dilute to 1000 mL. Sulfuric acid reagent: Conc. H 2 SO 4
containing 23.5 g silver sulfate, Ag 2 SO 4 , per 4.09 kg bottle. With continuous
stirring, the silver sulfate may be dissolved in about 30 minutes. Standard
ferrous ammonium sulfate (0.25 N): Dissolve 98.0 g of Fe (NH 4 ) 2 (SO 4 ) 2
6H 2 O in distilled water. Add 20 mL of conc. H 2 SO 4, cool and dilute to 1
liter. This solution must be standardized daily against standard K 2 Cr 2 O 7
solution. Standardization: To approximately 200 mL of distilled water add 25.0
mL of 0.25 N K 2 Cr 2 O 7 solution. Add 20 mL of H 2 SO 4 and cool. Titrate
with ferrous ammonium sulfate using 3 drops of ferroin indicator. The color
change is sharp, going from blue-green to reddish-brown. Mercuric sulfate:
Powdered HgSO 4Phenanthroline ferrous sulfate (ferroin) indicator solution:
Dissolve 1.48 g of 1-10 (ortho) phenanthroline monohydrate, together with 0.70
g of FeSO 4 7H 2 O in 100 mL of water. This indicator may be purchased
32
33
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
20
20
After
Sample 1
20
Sample 2
20
Solution
(ml)
Blank Titre
12.7
13.7
12.6
12.6
Value (ml)
Sample
4.8
6.1
9.7
9.6
790
760
290
300
Titre Value
(ml)
COD (mg/l)
Before
Sample 1
Sample 2
20
20
After
Sample 1
20
Sample 2
20
Solution
(ml)
Blank Titre
12.7
13.7
12.7
12.7
Value (ml)
Sample
11.3
11.8
11.8
11.6
Titre Value
34
(ml)
COD (mg/l)
140
COD ANALYSIS
COD =
190
90
= 790
Sample 2 =
mg
l
= 760
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
= 290
Sample 2 =
mg
l
= 300
mg
l
35
110
=140
Sample 2 =
mg
l
=140
mg
l
AFTER TREATMENT
Sample 1 =
= 90
Sample 2 =
mg
l
= 110
mg
l
36
37
39
Pour the sample from the pipet or graduated cylinder into a clean BOD
bottle.
Agitate the dilution water and fill the remaining portion of the BOD bottle
with dilution water.
Prepare three samples containing only dilution water. These samples serve
as blanks for quality control. If two of the three samples meet the blank-water
criterion, accept the data.
Calibrate the DO instrument in accordance with the procedures outlined in
NFM 6.2.
After bringing the samples to saturation and preparing the dilutions, measure
the initial DO concentration (D1) of each sample and each dilution blank.
Carefully insert the self-stirring sensor into the BOD bottle, avoiding air
entrapment. Turn on the stirrer and allow 1 to 2 minutes for the DO and
temperature readings to stabilize. Record the bottle number, date, time, and D1
on a form similar to that shown in figure. Turn off the stirrer and remove the
sensor from the BOD bottle. Rinse the sensor and stirrer with deionized water
from a wash bottle. Discard rinse water into a waste container. Add glass beads
to the BOD bottle, if necessary, to displace the sample up to the neck of the
bottle so that inserting a glass stopper will displace all air, leaving no bubbles.
Carefully cap the BOD bottle with the ground-glass stopper. Tip the bottle to
one side and check for an air bubble.
If an air bubble is present, add glass beads to the bottle until the bubble
is removed. Cap the bottle and check again for an air bubble. Repeat if
necessary.
If no bubble is present in the sample, create a water seal by adding
distilled or deionized water to the top of the BOD bottle around the glass
41
stopper. Then place the overcap over the stopper on the BOD bottle to
minimize evaporation from the water seal.
Place the sealed BOD sample in the air incubator or water bath and incubate
the sample at 20C 1C for 5 days.
At the end of 5 days 4 hours, remove the BOD bottles from the incubator,
remove the overcap, pour off the water seal, remove the ground-glass stopper,
and measure the final DO concentration (D2).
The DO uptake (DO0 days - DO5 days) in the dilution water should not
be greater than 0.2 mg/L and preferably not more than 0.1 mg/L.
Exceeding the 0.2-mg/L criterion could be grounds for rejecting results of
the BOD analysis of the environmental sample.
Dilution water of poor quality will cause an oxygen demand and appear
as sample BOD. Improve purification or get the dilution water from
another source if DO uptake exceeds 0.2 mg/L (see section 7.0.5,
Troubleshooting).
Complete the field form by recording the date, time, and D2 for each
respective sample bottle.
The BOD5 test can be quite variable. Collect sufficient field and split
replicates (10 to 20 percent) to provide an estimate of method variability.
A
10
15.68
Before
B
15
17.04
(mg/l)
Final D.O.
2.48
3.52
42
C
20
17.92
A
20
9.2
After
B
25
9.84
2.4
2.88
2.56
C
50
11.76
2.72
(mg/l)
BOD (mg/l)
330
225
194
79
72.8
45.2
A
10
8.48
Before
B
20
11.44
C
25
13.36
(mg/l)
Final D.O.
2.64
1.68
(mg/l)
BOD (mg/l)
146
122
= 19.6 ml
43
A
100
9.44
After
B
150
10.72
C
200
13.44
2.16
2.08
2.48
2.08
112
18.4
13.73
14.2
19.6 0.01
100
1.96 103
8 1000
= 15.68 mg/l
5 Day D.O.
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
= 3.1 ml
3.1 0.01
100
3.1 104
8 1000
= 2.48 mg/l
B.O.D =
B.O.D =
(15.682.48)
250
10
= 330 mg/l
The above Calculation Procedure is repeated for Sample B and for
determining the Initial D.O. and Final D.O.
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
44
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
AFTER TREATMENT
The above Calculation Procedure is repeated for Sample A and for
determining the Initial D.O. and Final D.O.
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
= 10.6 ml
1.06 10
8 1000
= 8.48 mg/l
5 Day D.O.
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
= 3.3 ml
3.3 0.01
100
3.3 10
8 1000
= 2.64 mg/l
B.O.D =
B.O.D =
(8.482.64)
250
10
= 146 mg/l
46
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
AFTER TREATMENT
The above Calculation Procedure is repeated for Sample A and for
determining the Initial D.O. and Final D.O.
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
Volume of Na2 s2 o3
important design parameter. Reed beds are generally designed to detain the
wastewater for a period of 5 to 7 days in order to allow sufficient time for the
settling and filtering of suspended solids, breakdown of organic matter, binding
of some contaminants onto the gravel, and removal of nutrients by plants and
micro-organisms.
They are environmentally friendly using only natural sustainable
ecological processes. Gravity driven systems dont require any energy input.
Maintenance requirements are low and can be carried out by anyone with the
modification of gardening skills and common sense.
They are highly effective when properly designed and can be used in
combination with ponds and wetlands to produce near river quality water.
Vertical flow reed-beds are more effective at nitrifying effluents, converting
ammonia into nitrates and nitrites, than most package of sewage system.
49
Sample Water
Time
Rate of filtration = 12 60
3
lit
sec
4.167 10
4.167 10 1000
60 60
50
1.157 103
m
sec
Rate of filtration = 4 60
4.167 103
lit
sec
1.157 103
m3
sec
1000 litres of wastewater can be treated in 2.7 days by using our REED BED
Project.
STP
Sample 1
Sample 2
95
80
50
65
92.3
91.67
50
50
51
3. Total Dissolved
Solids
4. Chemical oxygen
demand
5. Biochemical
Oxygen Demand
90.63
94.74
50
45
63.29
60.52
35.71
42.11
76.77
67.64
87.32
88.74
BEFORE TREATMENT
AFTER TREATMENT
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
The project gives us the idea about Biological Treatment for treating the
waste water using REED BED system. Plants provide an environment for
microbes to live, they oxygenate the wastewater, providing nutrients for the
microbes to survive, they stabilize the soil and they also partake in the reduction
of nutrients.
52
REFERENCES
Badejo. A, Tertiary Hospital Wastewater Treatment using Reed Bed
Technology Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering,
University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
53
54