Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AVR parameter
Parameter
Tuning,
Index
Terms-- Excitation
System,
Automatic
Voltage
Regulators,
Parameter
Optimization,
Linearized model
I. INTRODUCTION
Seoul National Uni versity, Kwanak-gu, Shinlim151-742, South Korea (e-mail: blues kilm@koreamail. conl).
Moon is with Seoul National University, Kwanak-gu, Shinlim151-742, South Korea (e-mail: simoon@plaza,snu.a c.kr).
Lee is with Seoul National University, Kwanak-gu, Shinlim151-742, South Korea (e-mail: ljoho@powerlab. snu.ac.kr).
oG
1---7;
+
Large ~
system ~
L---------J
1554
0-7803-7031-7/01/$10.00 (C) 2001 IEEE
A(z
r
AS
al2 *13
210000
A ~ fd _ 31 32 a33
@id
a41 42 43
A@,q
5I 52 a53
A @2q _a61 62 a63
14 15 a16
al I
t=
5A6
34
a44
a54
64
35
45
55
a65
bO
11
00
A;
A I#fd
ATM
36
0 32
AY,d
+
00
AEFD
46
[1
00
56 Av,q
a66_@2q
.0
0-
IV. RELATIONSHIPS
BETWEENTHECHARACTERISTICS
OFTHE
FREQUENCY-DOMAIN
ANDTHEON-LINEPERFORMANCES
(1)
6Avfd +61A ld
the
III.
LINEARIZED EXCITATION
Generator parameters
MODEL
,
na
v.
K,
v,
sK,
, .*
.
v,
ST,
v.
V.,.
I,.
11
1+ sT,
IN
&
o-
F,x .
5:;
0.05
1;;
0.;5
,,3.5
L,
L:,
L;
i,
L:
0.198
1.728
0.45
0.09
T.
T,
K,,
120.0
0.15
1.0
0.5
0.0
1.19
K,
K,
T,.
R.
x,
c!
0.158
0.158
0.158
0.673
0.673
0.673
7.2
23.1
41.6
0.15
0.3
0.5
A V,.
=
I
[ ~ETr
~J,
T, j
1.0
El =1.0
Q,
0.06
0.12
0.2
A V,
L,
KE
where,
A&,.
0.0
TA
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
K,,
K,
f[I.]
2.5
0.5
Operating Conditions
1 + sT,
T
do
1.8
0.27
Exciter parameters
..
As
shown
1555
0-7803-7031-7/01/$10.00 (C) 2001 IEEE
45
50
OIc
[rad/see]
55
60
65
70
Phase Margin[degree]
(b)
(a)
1,5
20
25
Q,
30
35
[rad/see]
(c)
Fig. 3. Relationships between the characteristics of frequency domain and time domain
where,
1556
0-7803-7031-7/01/$10.00 (C) 2001 IEEE
(Rate feedback)
0-200
0.1-0.2
II
0-500
0.1-0.2
20-50
0,2- 0.3
II 50-60
0.2- 0.3
50-60
0.3- 0.5
parameter
reposed
Method
K, = 0.056
malytical
Method
K, = 0.067
Over
shoot
Rise
Time
8.7
0.71
0/0
LOa-@7ssF
Weighting value
Load-angle
Tuning
Method
Settling
Time (Syo)
2.9
see]
8.9
0.79
%0
[see]
[see]
3.1
(see]
1.035
II 600-65~J
1.030
1.025
VI.
CASE STUDY
1.020
2
Q
Ur
1.015
1,010
1.005
1.000
In
time (see)
Operating Conditions
E,
<
Q,
0,2
1.0
0.06
R,
XE
0.210
0.603
13.7
lY. OPER,ATINGCONDITION
Operating Conditions
x,
~
Q,
8
L
0.210
h
TABLE.
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.158
0.673
0.205-
.,
6
45.3
~
0.200 ~
~~
o.195-
0.190 I
o
1 ;
--------- Analytical
.:
:
I
2
r
I
1
4
,.I
6
method
I
i3
time (see)
Fig.4. Simulationresults(3%stepchangein
1557
V,e, , d = 13.7 )
1
10
time and settling time than the response of the parameter that
is tuned by analytical method. They also show some more
oscillatory but well-damped response of electrical torque.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents an AVR parameter tuning method using
optimization technique with frequency responses of on-line
system model. The proposed tuning method find the optimal
parameters that maximize the object function in order to
improve the voltage response at on-line conditions and satisfy
the constraints in order to guarantee the stable operation of
both the generator on-line conditions and the generator offline conditions. So the efforts for performing tradeoffs
between fast response and stable operation are greatly reduced.
In addition, as the proposed method uses the on-line system
model, the parameters tuned by this method show more
optimal responses than tuned by traditional method using offline model at the operating condition.
Since this method needs no additional compensators, the
optimal parameter sets of conventional AVRS are readily
obtained at the various operating conditions.
m=]
VIII. REFERENCES
10
time (see)
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
10
[10]
time (see)
[11]
Fig.5. Simulation results (3% step change in V,C~, ~ = 45.3 )
[12]
1558
0-7803-7031-7/01/$10.00 (C) 2001 IEEE
IX.
BIOGFL4PHIES,
1559
0-7803-7031-7/01/$10.00 (C) 2001 IEEE