Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L-11658
1918
February 15,
The Case
MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.:
August 7, 1935
September 29,
Held:
The Assessment Law provides that the realty
tax is due "on real property, including land,
buildings, machinery, and other
improvements".
SC hold that the said equipment and
machinery, as appurtenances to the gas
station building or shed owned by Caltex (as to
which it is subject to realty tax) and which
fixtures are necessary to the operation of the
gas station, for without them the gas station
would be useless, and which have been
attached or affixed permanently to the gas
station site or embedded therein, are taxable
improvements and machinery within the
meaning of the Assessment Law and the Real
Property Tax Code.
Note:
Improvements is a valuable addition made
to property or an amelioration in its condition,
amounting to more than mere repairs or
replacement of waste, costing labor or capital
and intended to enhance its value, beauty or
utility or to adapt it for new or further
purposes.
Machinery shall embrace machines,
mechanical contrivances, instruments,
appliances and apparatus attached
to the real estate. It includes the physical
facilities available for production, as well as the
installations and appurtenant service facilities,
together with all other equipment designed for
or essential to its manufacturing, industrial or
agricultural purposes.
Issue:
Whether or not the pieces of gas station
equipment and machinery enumerated are
subject to realty tax.
Fact:
In 1973, the Comissioner on Public Highways
entered into a contract to reclaim areas of
Manila Bay with the Construction and
Development Corportion of the Philippines
(CDCP).
PEA (Public Estates Authority) was created by
President Marcos under P.D. 1084, tasked with
developing and leasing reclaimed lands. These
lands were transferred to the care of PEA under
P.D. 1085 as part of the Manila Cavite Road and
Reclamation Project (MCRRP). CDCP and PEA
entered into an agreement that all future
projects under the MCRRP would be funded and
owned by PEA.
By 1988, President Aquino issued Special
Patent No. 3517 transferring lands to PEA. It
was followed by the transfer of three Titles
(7309, 7311 and 7312) by the Register of
Deeds of Paranaque to PEA covering the three
reclaimed islands known as the FREEDOM
ISLANDS.
Subsquently, PEA entered into a joint venture
agreement (JVA) with AMARI, a Thai-Philippine
corporation to develop the Freedom Islands.
Along with another 250 hectares, PEA and
AMARI entered the JVA which would later
transfer said lands to AMARI. This caused a stir
especially when Sen. Maceda assailed the
agreement, claiming that such lands were part
of public domain (famously known as the
mother of all scams).
Peitioner Frank J. Chavez filed case as a
taxpayer praying for mandamus, a writ of
preliminary injunction and a TRO against the
sale of reclaimed lands by PEA to AMARI and
from implementing the JVA. Following these
events, under President Estradas admin, PEA
and AMARI entered into an Amended JVA and
Mr. Chaves claim that the contract is null and
void.
Issue:
w/n: the transfer to AMARI lands reclaimed or
to be reclaimed as part of the stipulations in
the (Amended) JVA between AMARI and PEA
violate Sec. 3 Art. XII of the 1987 Constitution
w/n: the court is the proper forum for raising
the issue of whether the amended joint venture
agreement is grossly disadvantageous to the
government.
Held:
On the issue of Amended JVA as violating the
constitution:
1. The 157.84 hectares of reclaimed lands
comprising the Freedom Islands, now covered
by certificates of title in the name of PEA, are
alienable lands of the public domain. PEA may
lease these lands to private corporations but
may not sell or transfer ownership of these
lands to private corporations. PEA may only sell
these lands to Philippine citizens, subject to the
ownership limitations in the 1987 Constitution
and existing laws.