You are on page 1of 27

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)

DESIGN OF BARRAGE
Maximum Discharge
Minimum Discharge
River Bed Level
Highest Flood Level
Lowest Water Level
Minimum Pond Level
No of Canals on Right
Bank
No of Canal on Left Bank
Maximum Discharge For
1 Canal

Qmax
Qmin
RBL
HFL
LWL

=
=
=
=
=
=

300000
12000
582
600
587
598

Cusecs
Cusecs
Ft
Ft
Ft

= 2
= 1
= 3500

Cusecs
Ft/mile

Slope of River

= 1

DESIGN OF BARRAGE PROFILE FOR OVERFLOW CONDITION


1.Minimum stable Wetted Perimeter
Wetted Parameter
Using Lacy Looseness
Coeffient
Width b/w Abutment

Pw

= 2.666(sqrt(300000))
= 1460

Ft

LCC

= 1.8

Wa

= 1.8 x 1460
2628

Ft

=
=
=
=

2400
175
20
35

Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft

= 2630

Ft

Try:,
40 bays @ 60
25 Piers @ 7
1 Fish Ladder
2 Divide Walls
Total

Wa

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 1

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Discharge b/w Abutments qabt
Discharge b/w Weir

qweir

= (300000/2630)
= 114.07

Cfs

= (300000/2400)
= 125

Cfs

2. Calculation of Lacys Silt Factor (f).


f

= [(1844/5000)(300000)1/6]3/5
= 1.94

3. Fixation of Crest Level.


Assume
Afflux

= 3

Ft

Height of Crest

= 6

Ft

Maximum Scour Depth

= 0.9 x (114.072/1.94)1/3
= 16.97

Ft

= 16.97-6
= 10.97

Ft

= 114.07/16.97
= 6.72

Ft/sec

= 6.722/(2 x 32.2)
0.7

Ft

= 10.97 + 0.7
= 11.67

Ft

= 18 + 0.7 +3
21.7

Ft

= 582+21.7
= 603.7

Ft

= 603.7 11.67
= 592.03

Ft

= 597.5

Ft

H0
Velocity Head

V0
H0
E0
E1

Level of

E1

Crest Level
Maximum D/S Water
Level

(From Discharge Curve)


h
h/E0

= 597.5 592.03
= 5.47

Ft

= 5.47/11.67
= 0.47

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 2

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)

Assume

Lacys Looseness
Coefficient

C/C

= 0.95

= 3.5

= 3.5 x 0.95
= 3.325

= 3.325 x 2400 x 11.673/2


= 318133.33

Cfs

> Qmax

OK

LCC

= 2630/1660
= 1.58

4. Design of Undersluices.
Fix Crest Level of undersluices 3 ft below the main weir.
Crest Level of
Undersluices

= 592.03-3
= 589.03

ft

Assume 5 Bays acts as Undersluices on both sides


b1
= 5 x 60
= 300

Ft

Assuming,
Discharge of
Undersluices

qus

Maximum Scour Depth

Velocity Head

= 120% of main weir.


=
=
=
=

1.2 x 125
150
0.9 x (1502/1.94)1/3
20.37

Cfs
Ft

D0

= 20.37

Ft

V0

= 150/20.37
= 7.36

Ft/sec

= 7.362/(2 x 32.2)
0.84

Ft

= 603.00 + 0.84
603.84

Ft

H0
Maximum USEL
E0

= 603.84 589.03

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 3

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)

Assume

Ft

= 14.81-3
= 11.81

Ft

h/E0

= 11.81/14.81
= 0.79

C/C

= 0.80

= 3.5

= 3.5 x 0.80
= 2.8

Q1 & Q3

= 2.8 x (300 x 2) x 14.813/2


= 95750.70

Cfs

= 3.325 x (2400-600) x 11.673/2


238600.00

Cfs

= 95750.70 + 238600.00
= 334350.7

Cfs

> Qmax (300,000)

OK

Qmain weir
Total Discharge

= 14.81

QTotal
QTotal

Now %age Water Passing through


Undersluices

= [95750.70/300000] x 100
= 32

The Undersluices are fixed at Crest

= 589.03

ft

Number of Bays on each side

= 5

5. Determination of Water Level and Energy Level.


We shall determine the water level and energy levels of the barrage for three states of the river i.e
a) Retrogressed State
b) Normal State
c) Accreted State
The Curve of the three states of the river are obtained by the actual stage-discharge relationship
at the barrage site.
5.1 Check for Main Weir
Check for Normal State
Check for Retrogressed State
Check for Accreted State

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 4

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 5

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


FOR UNDERSLUICES:-

6. Fixation of d/s floor level and length of d/s glacis and d/s floor.
6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for normal weir section using Crumps method and determination
of floor length.
a)
Discharge
Maximum

Q
DSWL
USWL
USEL
RBL

Crest Level
DSFL
Dpool
d/s velocity

d/s velocity head

h0
DSEL
K
L
q

Critical Depth

C
L/C
(K+F)/C

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

300000
603
604
604.5
582
592.03
576
603-576
27
300000/(27 x 2630)
4.23
4.232/(2 x 32.2)
0.28
603+0.28
603.28
604.5-592.03
12.47
604.5-603.28
1.22
300000/2400
125
[125/32.2]1/3
7.86
1.22/7.86
0.15

1.92

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Cfs
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft/sec
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Cfs/ft
Ft

Page | 6

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


(From Crumps Curve)
F
Level of Interaction
of jump with glacis

E2
Submergence of
Jump
Length of glacis d/s
of jump
Length of silting pool
Length of d/s floor
say
b)
Discharge
Minimum

Q
DSWL
USWL
USEL
RBL

Crest Level
DSFL
Dpool
d/s velocity

d/s velocity head

h0
DSEL
K
L
q

=
=

1.92 x 7.86 12.47


2.62

Crest level F

=
=

592.03-2.62
589.41

Ft

=
=

603.28 589.41
13.87

Ft

589.41 576

13.41

3 x 13.41

40.23

Ft

=
=

4.5 x 13.87
62.42

Ft

=
=
=

62.42 - 40.23
23
25

Ft

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

300000
593
598
598.95
582
592.03
576
593-576
17
300000/(17 x 2630)
6.71
6.712/(2 x 32.2)
0.70
593+0.7
593.7
598.95-592.03
6.92
598.95-593.7
5.25
300000/2400
125

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft

Cfs
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft/sec
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Cfs/ft

Page | 7

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Critical Depth

=
=
=
=

[125/32.2]1/3
7.86
5.25/7.86
0.67

(K+F)/C

2.52
(From Crumps Curve)

=
=

2.52 x 7.86 6.92


12.89

Crest level F

=
=

592.03-12.89
579.14

Ft

=
=

593.7 579.14
14.56

Ft

579.14 576

3.14

Ft

=
=

3 x 3.14
9.42

Ft

=
=

4.5 x 14.56
65.52

Ft

=
=
=

65.52- 9.42
56
60

Ft

C
L/C

Level of Interaction of jump with


glacis

E2
Submergence of
Jump
Length of glacis d/s of jump
Length of silting pool
Length of d/s floor
say

Ft

Hence we shall provide d/s floor 60 ft long.


6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for undersluices section using Crumps method and determination
of floor length
95750.70
a)
Discharge
Q
=
114900
Cfs
Maximum
DSWL
=
603.5
Ft
USWL
=
604.5
Ft
USEL
=
605.19
Ft
RBL
=
582
Ft
Crest Level
=
589.03
Ft
DSFL
=
573
Ft
Dpool
=
603.5-573
=
30.5
Ft
d/s velocity
V
=
114900/(30.5 x 600)
=
6.28
Ft/sec

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 8

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


d/s velocity head

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

6.282/(2 x 32.2)
0.61
603.5+0.61
604.11
605.19-589.03
16.16
605.19-604.11
1.08
114900/600
191.5
[191.52/32.2]1/3
10.44
1.08/10.44
0.10

(K+F)/C

1.97
(From Crumps Curve)

=
=

1.97x 10.44 16.16


4.40

Crest level F

=
=

589.03-4.4
584.63

Ft

=
=

604.11 584.63
19.48

Ft

584.63 573

11.63

3 x 11.63

34.89

Ft

=
=

4.5 x19.48
87.66

Ft

say

=
=
=

87.66 34.89
53
55

Ft

Q
DSWL
USWL
USEL
RBL

=
=
=
=
=

114900
598
603
603.79
582

Cfs
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft

h0
DSEL
K
L
q

Critical Depth

C
L/C

Level of Interaction
of jump with glacis

E2
Submergence of
Jump
Length of glacis d/s
of jump
Length of silting pool
Length of d/s floor

b)
Discharge
Minimum

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Cfs/ft
Ft

Ft

Page | 9

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Crest Level

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

589.03
573
598-573
25
114900/(25 x 600)
7.66
7.662/(2 x 32.2)
0.91
598+0.91
598.91
603.79-589.03
14.76
603.79-598.91
13.88
114900/600
191.5
[191.52/32.2]1/3
10.44
13.88/10.44
1.33

(K+F)/C

2.9
(From Crumps Curve)

=
=

2.9 x 10.44 14.76


15.5

Crest level F

=
=

589.03-15.5
573.53

Ft

=
=

598.91 573.53
25.38

Ft

573.53 573

0.53

3 x 0.53

1.59

Ft

=
=

4.5 x 25.38
114.21

Ft

=
=
=

114.21-1.59
113
115

Ft

DSFL
Dpool
d/s velocity

d/s velocity head

h0
DSEL
K
L
q

Critical Depth

C
L/C

Level of Interaction
of jump with glacis

E2
Submergence of
Jump
Length of glacis d/s
of jump
Length of silting pool
Length of d/s floor
say

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft/sec
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ft
Cfs/ft
Ft

Ft

Page | 10

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Hence we shall provide d/s floor 115 ft long.

7. Scour Protection.
Assume 20% concentration,
q

=
=

125 x 1.2
150

Cfs

=
=

0.9 x [(1502)/1.94]
20.37

ft

=
=

1.75 for d/s floor critical


condition.
1.75 x 20.37
35.65

Ft

Minimum D/S Water


Level for 0.3 million
discharge.

593

Ft

D/s Apron Level

576

Ft

Depth of Water on
Apron

593 576

17

Ft

Depth of Water with


concentration.
17.5

Ft

=
=

35.65 17.5
18.15

Ft

Sq.rt (32 + 12) x (18.15)

R
7.1 D/S Scour Protection.
Safety Factor

Add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration.


D

R D
Length of Apron to cover a surface
of scour at 1:3 slope

57.40
Therefore the length of D/S stone
apron in horizontal position

Ft

57.40 x {1.25t/1.75t]
41

Ft

7.2 U/S Scour Protection.


Safety Factor
R

1.25 for U/S Floor

=
=

1.25 x 20.37
25.46

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft

Page | 11

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Minimum U/S Water Level for
Discharge of 0.3 million cfs.

598

Ft

U/S Apron Level

582

Ft

Depth of Water on
Apron

598 582

16

Ft

Depth of Water with


concentration.
16.5

Ft

=
=

25.46 16.5
8.96

Ft

Sq.rt (32 + 12) x (8.96)

=
=

28.32
30 (Say)

30 x {1.25t/1.75t]

21.45

Add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration.


D

R D
Length of Apron to
cover a surface of
scour at 1:3 slope

Therefore the length


of U/S stone apron in
horizontal position

ft

ft

7.3 Thickness of Aprons.


The Basic Idea in determining the thickness is that there should be sufficient volume of stones
when launching that it fully covers the surface of scour at maximum possible slope (1:3).Now t
for medium sand and a slope of 12/mile is 34.
Thickness of Stone Apron in
Horizontal position

1.75 x (34/12)

Ft

While the size of the concrete blocks over the filter will be 4 x 4 x 4 , the thickness of the stone
apron shall be 5 ft.
Summary,
Total Length of D/S Stone Apron

41

Ft

4 thick block Apron

13 (1/3 of Total Length)

Ft

5 thick block Apron

28

Ft

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 12

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Total Length of U/S Stone Apron

21.45

Ft

4 thick block Apron

7 (Block Size 4 x 4x 4)

Ft

5 thick block Apron

14.45

Ft

7.4 Scour Protection For Undersluices.


Proceeding on similar lines above, the length and thickness for the U/S & D/s loose stone aprons
may be calculated for the undersluices portion. In this case since the discharge intensity will be
higher, the maximum scour will be more than that in previous case & consequently the length
will be greater as compared to those for the normal weir section.
Assume 20% concentration,
q
=
159.58 x 1.2
=
191.5

Cfs

0.9 x [(191.52)/1.94]1/3
23.97

ft

=
=

1.75 for d/s floor critical


condition.
1.75 x 23.97
41.96

Ft

Minimum D/S Water


Level for 0.3 million
discharge.

593

Ft

D/s Apron Level

576

Ft

Depth of Water on
Apron

593 576

17

Ft

Depth of Water with


concentration.
17.5

Ft

=
=

41.96 17.5
24.46

Ft

Sq.rt (32 + 12) x (24.46)

77.35

=
=

7.4.1 D/S Scour Protection.


Safety Factor

Add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration.


D

R D
Length of Apron to cover a surface
of scour at 1:3 slope

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft

Page | 13

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Therefore the length of D/S stone
apron in horizontal position

77.35 x {1.25t/1.75t]

55.25

1.25 for U/S Floor

=
=

1.25 x 23.97
29.96

Ft

Minimum U/S Water Level for


Discharge of 0.3 million cfs.

598

Ft

U/S Apron Level

582

Ft

Depth of Water on
Apron

598 582

16

Ft

Depth of Water with


concentration.
16.5

Ft

=
=

29.96 16.5
13.46

Ft

Sq.rt (32 + 12) x (13.46)

=
=

42.57
45 (Say)

45 x {1.25t/1.75t]

32.15

Ft

7.4.2 U/S Scour Protection.


Safety Factor
R

Add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration.


D

R D
Length of Apron to
cover a surface of
scour at 1:3 slope

Therefore the length


of U/S stone apron in
horizontal position

ft

ft

7.4.3 Thickness of Aprons.


The Basic Idea in determining the thickness is that there should be sufficient volume of stones
when launching that it fully covers the surface of scour at maximum possible slope (1:3).Now t
for medium sand and a slope of 12/mile is 34.
Thickness of Stone Apron in
Horizontal position

1.75 x (34/12)

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft

Page | 14

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


While the size of the concrete blocks over the filter will be 4 x 4 x 4 , the thickness of the stone
apron shall be 5 ft.
Summary,
Total Length of D/S Stone Apron

55.25

Ft

4 thick block Apron

18 (1/3 of Total Length)

Ft

5 thick block Apron

37.25

Ft

Total Length of U/S Stone Apron

32.15

Ft

4 thick block Apron

10 (Block Size 4 x 4x 4)

Ft

5 thick block Apron

22.15

Ft

8. Inverted Filter Design.


Extensive experiments have shown that it is not necessary for a filter to restrain all the particles
of the soil. Instead it may restrain 15% coarser or the D85 of the soil. These voids will create
smaller openings to trap finer soil particles. Therefore the diameter of the openings of the filter
must be less then D85 of the soil. Since Effective pore diameter is about 1/5D15.
Therefore:

D85(Filter)

>

5D85 (Soil)

If Filter provide free drainage than it much more pervious than the soil and in such case the
criterion is.
D15(Filter)

>

5 D15 (Soil)

The Concrete Block of 4 x 4 x 4 will be placed over 2ft thick inverted filter which consists of a
9 layer of Single (3-6) over 9 layer of coarse shingle (3/4 -3) over 6 layer of fine shingle
(3/16 ).there are 2 inches wide spacings on the sides of the blocks which are filled with
fine shingle to provide free seepage flow.

9. Design of Guide Bank.


1)
Length of each guide bank measured in a straight line along the barrage U/S is
LU/S

=
=

1.5 x 2630
3945

ft

2)
Length of Guide bank D/s of Barrage

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 15

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


LD/S

=
=

0.2 x 2630
526

1.75 x 20.37

15.28

1.25 x 20.37

25.46

1:3

Free Board U/S

7 (Above HFL Level)

Ft

Free Board D/S

6 (Above HFL Level)

ft

Ft

3)
For the nose of the S/S guide
bank & the full length of D/S guide
bank use Laceys depth.
For remaining U/s guide bank
Laceys depth

Ft

Ft

4)
Possible Slope of
Scour
5)

These Free board also contains allowance for Accretion.


6)
Top of Guide Bank Width

40

Ft

Side Slope of Guide Bank

1:2

Minimum Apron Thickness

Ft

Length of Barrage

2630

Ft

Length of U/S Guide Bank

3945

ft

Length of D/S Guide Bank

526

ft

Radius of U/S Curved Part

600

Ft

Radius of D/s Curved Path

400

Ft

Maximum U/S Angle Protected

1400

Maximum D/S Angle Protected

570 -800

7)
8)

9.1 Determination Levels of Guide Bank.


L

[d1-d2}/S +D(1/S C2/g) x

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 16

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


[(d1/D) (d2/D)]
Normal Depth of Flow Without
Weir (Assuming a wide rectangular
channel)

Depth Flow U/S Side of Weir

d1

Depth of Water At Distance L U/S

d2

Chezys Coefficient

71 (Maximum For Earthen


Channel)

32.2

1/5000

(d1/D)

Bed Level

582.00

Ft

D/S High Flood Level With


Accretion

603.00

Ft

=
=

603.00 582.00
18

Ft

604.00

Ft

=
=

604 - 582
19

Ft

1/5000

Bed Slope

Function Which has been


Calculated By Bresse For Various
Values of d1/D

Ft/sec2

Using the Above


Formulas

D
U/S High Flood
Level
d1
S

Assume d2 At the nose of the guide Bank & Calculate l. If the assumed value is correct, the L will
come out to be equal to the Length of the Guide Bank.
Assume,
d2
=
18.8
Ft
d1/D
( d1/D)

=
=

19 / 18
1.056

0.8568

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

ft

Page | 17

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)

d2/D
( d2/D)

From Bresse Back Water


Function Table.

=
=

18.8/18
1.05

0.8968

Ft

Substituting the Values in Above Formula

=
>=

Rise I River Bed Level

ft
Ft
Ft

=
=

3945 / 5000
0.789
From The Level At Barrage
water level along h/w axis at
3945; U/s of Barrage.
582 + 0.789 + 18.8
601.589

601.589 + free board

=
=

601.589 + 7
608.598

Ft

=
=
=

HFL + Free Board


600 + 7
607

Ft

Water Level D/S of Barrage

603

Ft

Free Board

Ft

Level Of Guide bank At D/S

609

ft

Level At the Nose of U/S Guide


Bank

Level at the Barrage

( (19-18.8) / (1/5000) ) +
18( (50000 (712/32.2))
[0.8968 0.8568]
3987
3945
(OK)
3987

Ft

At D/S Guide Bank:-

10. Design of Guide Bank Apron.


Length of unlaunched (horizontal)
Apron

2.5 (R D)

Length of Launched Apron at 1:3

Sq.rt(10) (R D)

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 18

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Slope
As Calculated Previously
t

=
=

34
3 (Say)

3 x 3.16 (R D)

9.5 (R D)

1.07 x 3

3.2

Ft

[ 9.5 (R D) ] /
[ 2.5 (R D) ]
3.80

Ft

3 x 3.8 -3.2

=
=

4.2
4 (Say)

Ft

Ft

=
=

[ q2/f ]1/3
[1252/1.94]1/3
20.04

Ft

=
=

2.25 x 20.04
45

Ft

1.5 x 20.04

30

1.25 x 20.04

25

Ft

18.9

ft

2.5 (R D)

=
=

2.5 x (20.04 18.9)


2.85

Sq.rt(10) (R D)

Sq.rt (10) x (20.04 18.9)

Volume of Stone in
Apron
Minimum Thickness
of Unlaunched Apron
Mean Thickness Of
Launched Apron

Maximum Thickness
of Unlaunched Apron

Nose of Guide Bank:Transition From Nose


to Straight
Straight Reach of
Guide Bank
D
Length of unlaunched (horizontal)
Apron

Length of Launched Apron at 1:3


Slope

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

In
Ft

Ft

Ft

Page | 19

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


=

3.6

Ft

=
=
=

9.5 (R D)
9.5 x ( 20.04 18.9)
10.83

Ft

Top Level (Above Estimated HFL


after allowing if 1.5 ft accretion )

Ft

Front Slope of Marginal Bunds

1:3

Back Slope to be such as to provide


a minimum of 2 ft cover,over a
hydraulic gradient.

1:6

U/S water Level at the nose of


Guide Bank

608.598

Ft

Free Board of Marginal Bund

Ft

Level of Marginal Bund

=
=

608.598 + 5
613.598

Ft

Volume of Stone in Apron

11. Design of Marginal Bank.

Calculation of Length of Back Water Curve


Back Water is effect produced by the afflux at the weir upon the water surfaceof the weir
d1
=
604 582
=
22
Ft
D

598 582

=
16
Table For Length of Back Water Curve
D

d1

[d11/S T1=
d2]/S C2/g d1/D
4
5
6
7
250 4843. 1.3 1.3
0
4
8
4

d2

3
21.
5

16

22

16

21.
5

21

16

21

20.
5

16

20.
5

20

16

20

19.
5

250
0

4843.
4

1.3
4

1.3
1

250
0
250
0
250
0

4843.
4
4843.
4
4843.
4

1.3
1
1.2
8
1.2
5

1.2
8
1.2
5
1.2
2

T2 =
d2/D
8
0.34
0.37
0.35
0.40
0.42

Ft

1[d C[d 1 10 x
L
1/D)
2
5x1
2/D]
9
10
11
11 + 4
0.0 2625.0 5125.0
0.37
3
7
7
1831.4
0.35
0.0
668.57
3
1
0.0 3345.2 5845.2
0.40
4
0
0
0.0 1832.3 4332.3
0.42
2
6
6
0.0 5766.9 8266.9
0.50
7
1
1

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 20

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


16

19.
5

19

16

19

18.
5

16

18.
5

18

16

18

17.
5

16

17.
5

17

16

17

16.
5

250
0
250
0
250
0
250
0
250
0
250
0

4843.
4
4843.
4
4843.
4
4843.
4
4843.
4
4843.
4

1.2
2
1.1
9
1.1
6
1.1
3
1.0
9
1.0
6

1.1
9
1.1
6
1.1
3
1.0
9
1.0
6
1.0
3

0.50

0.56

0.56

0.68

0.68

0.68

0.35

0.83

0.68

0.84

0.84

1.06

0.0
6
0.1
2
0.0
2
0.4
5
0.1
7
0.2
4

4804.4
1
8998.3
4
1287.2
1
34549.
9
12955.
6
18490.
1

7304.4
1
11498.
3
3787.2
1
37049.
9
15455.
6
20990.
1
12450
6

Sum

PART-2
DESIGN OF BARRAGE PROFILE FOR SUB-SURFACE FLOW CONDITION

12. Fixation of Depth of Sheet Piles.


Scour Depth

U/S Sheet Pile


RL of U/S Sheet Pile
Depth below HFL for
D/S sheet Pile
RL of Bottom of Intermediate Sheet
Pile
RL of Bottom D/S Sheet Pile

16.97

Ft

=
=

1.5 x 16.97
26

Ft

=
=

604 26
578

Ft

2 x 16.97

34

604 34

570

Ft

555

Ft

Ft

13. Calculation of Exit Gradient.


Ge
Assume Retrogressed
on D/S River Bed.

H/d [1/( sq.rt())]

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Ft

Page | 21

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Differential Head
Causing Seepage
Depth of DS Sheet
Pile
ToTal Length of
Concrete Floor

604 ( 576 4)

32

576 555

21
592.03

50 + 75.18 + 115

240.18

=
=

240.18 / 21
11.44

1/( sq.rt() =

0.125
From Graph

Ge

0.19 (hence Safe)

ft

Ft

Ft

14. Calculation of Uplift Pressures after applying Correction..


14.1 U/s Pile line
Length of Concrete
floor upto the U/S
Sheet pile

Assume,

B1

50

Ft

240.18

Ft

=
=

582 578
4

Ft

tf

2.5

Ft

1/

=
=

4 / 240.18
0.016

b1/b

=
=

50 / 240.18
0.21

1-b1/b

=
=

1-0.21
0.79

=
=

D = 100 30
70

=
=
=

E
100 40
68

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 22

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


K
1)
Correction For Floor Thickness
Correction in K

Correctioon in A

=
=

C
66

=
=
=

Tf/d ( B - K)
2.5/4 (70 66 )
2.5

=
=

2.5/4 (68 66)


1.25

2)
Correction for Interference of sheet piles
d

582 578
4
582 570
12

Ft
Ft

240.18

Ft

75.18

Ft

19 [ (d +D ) / b sq.rt ( D/b)

+0.5

-Fs (bs/b1)

Fs

3.3

bs

=
=

592.03 582
10.03

Ft

75.18

Ft

=
=

-3.3 x ( 10.03 / 75.18)


-0.44

=
=

68 1.25
66.75

70

Correction in K due
to Second Pile

3)
Slope Correction for
K
Correction For K
For Slope 1:4

B1
Correction For K
Hence,
Corrected A
Corrected B

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 23

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Corrected K

=
=

66 + 2.5 + 0.5 0.44


68.56

10

Ft

=
=

576 570
6

Ft

240.18

Ft

b1

125.18

Ft

b1/b

0.52

=
=

b/d
40

=
=
=

E
100 -60
40

=
=

D
38

=
=

C
35

=
=

-10/6 (40-38)
-3.33

=
=

-1.67 x (38-35)
-5

14.2 Intermediate Sheet Pile at toe of D/S glacis.


Assume Floor
Thickness
d

M
N
Correction Due to
Floor thickness
Correction in L
Correction in M

Correction for Interference of sheet piles


d
D

=
=

582 578
4
582 570
12

Ft
Ft

240.18

Ft

75.18

Ft

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 24

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Correction in L due
to U/S Sheet Pile

-19 [ (d +D ) / b sq.rt ( D/b)

-0.5

19 [ (6 +26 ) / b sq.rt ( 26/b)

1.2

-Fs (bs/b1)

Fs

4.5

bs

=
=

592.03 582
10.03

Ft

75.18

Ft

=
=

4.5 x ( 10.03 / 75.18)


0.6

=
=

40 -3.33-0.5+0.6
36.77

Corrected M

38

Corrected N

=
=

35 + 1.2+1.2
37.4

Ft

=
=

576 555
21

Ft

240.18

Ft

1/

=
=

d/b
0.087

=
=

E
30

Correction in N due
to D/S Sheet Pile

3)
Slope Correction for
K
Correction For L
For Slope 1:4

B1
Correction For L
Hence,
Corrected L

14.2 D/S Sheet Pile at End of Impervious Floor.


Assume Floor
Thickness
d

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

Page | 25

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


=

20

=
=

C
0

=
=

-7/21 (30-20)
-3.33

=
=

7/21 x (20-0)
6.67

240.18

Ft

115

Ft

-19 [ (12+26 ) / b sq.rt


( 12/115)
-7.97

=
=

30 -3.33-7.97
18.7

Corrected Q

20

Corrected R

=
=

0 + 6.67
6.67

R
Correction Due to
Floor thickness
Correction in P
Correction in R
Correction for
Interference of sheet
piles

Correction in P due
to U/S Sheet Pile

Hence,
Corrected P

15 Calculation Of Floor Thickness.


Specific Gravity of
Concrete
a)
Thickness of floor at
A
Assumed Thickness
Thickness From
Uplift Pressure

2.4

2.5

66.75/100 x 32/1.4

1.27
(OK)

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

ft

ft

Page | 26

IRRIGATION & HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING LAB (DESIGN OF BARRAGE)


Similarly Provide 2.5 ft thick floor at K & glacis on U/S side
b)
Thickness of Floor at L
Assumed Thickness

Ft

Thickness From
Uplift Pressure

36.77/100 x 32/1.4

0.7
(OK)

ft

Assumed Thickness

Ft

Thickness From
Uplift Pressure

37.4/100 x 32/1.4

0.71
(OK)

ft

Assumed Thickness

1.5

Ft

Thickness From
Uplift Pressure

18.7/100 x 32/1.4

0.35
(OK)

ft

Assumed Thickness

2.5

Ft

Uplift Pressure at
Crest

=
=

36.77 +(68.56 36.77)/75.18


x10.03
41

41/100 x 32/1.4

0.78
(OK)

c)
Thickness of Floor at N

d)
Thickness of Floor at
P

e)
Thickness of Floor at crest

Thickness From
Uplift Pressure

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(UOL)

ft

Page | 27

You might also like