Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 1. Lake Liming in Norway (image taken from Norwegian Environment Agency)
Immediate and medium term impacts of liming have been reported. Monteith
(2005) stated that catchment liming in Wales showed first clear evidence of
chemical recovery from acidification at a national scale. In summer 1987,
catchment liming of Llyn Brianne was reported to have increased mean pH from
5.2 to >6.5 since treatment (Welsh Water, 1988 as cited by Gee and Stoner,
1989).
The biological recovery of an acidified river is always preceded by chemical
recovery (Driscoll et al., 2001). Increasing stream pH to circumneutral levels is
expected to increase stream biodiversity to its original or near-original state
(Howells, G. and Brown, D., 1992). Liming projects in UK, Europe and USA have
been accompanied by increase in fish population and acid-sensitive invertebrates
(Mant et al., 2013). In Enningdal, a watershed shared by Norway and Sweden,
crustaceans were observed to respond better than fishes to improved water
quality after more than 20 years of liming (Hesthagen et al., 2007).
Reintroduction of salmon and brown trout were found to thrive after being absent
in the watershed in the 1980s. The salmon catch has increased from 5 tonnes
Figure 2. Trends in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at 3 UKAWMN lakes (image taken from
UKAWMN (2001)
Despite liming has been found to increase pH in acidified streams and lakes in UK
and Norway (Mant et al., 2013), in some parts of Llyn Brianne, liming was
suggested to increase the dissolve organic carbon (DOC) (Figure 1) (UKAWMN,
2001). DOC offsets the direct effects of liming by providing additional acidity.
Liming of catchment without existing knowledge of existing ecosystems may be
detrimental especially on naturally oligotrophic, base-poor, and of high
conservation ecosystems (Ormerod, 1989; Woodin & Skiba, 1990; Farmer, 1992
as cited by Buckton &Ormerod, 1996)
The mixing zone that occurs where an acidic tributary enters a limed river can be
highly toxic to the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and brown trout (Salmo trutta
L.) in the limed River Audna, southern Norway (tland and Barlaup, 1995). Acid
episodes may contribute to slow biological recovery. Some stream diatoms are
highly sensitive to short-term acidification (Hirst et al., 2004) as well insects. .
This is supported by Lepori and Ormerod (2005) wherein they observed that the
spring distribution of Baetis alpinus in acid sensitive parts of the Alps directly
reflects the toxicity of acid runoff during snowmelt. The study also demonstrated
that even mild episodic acidification can have significant impact in Alpine
streams for highly acid-sensitive insects like the B. alpinus. Previously held belief
that only limited dispersal hinders biological recovery from acidification was
refuted by a study in the Llyne Brianne by Masters et al.(2007). The study states
that aside from insect mating behaviour, acid episodes are also involved in the
delayed macroinvertebrate increase in limed catchments.
Acid episodes sometimes occur due to base cation dilution to precipitation, sea
salt inputs and NO3- pulses as was observed in Afon Gwy (Evans et al., 2008b). A
related study by Evans et al (2008a) showed that although sulphur
concentrations have declined, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) have increased
which resulted in increased organic acidity thus offsetting the benefits of a
decrease in mineral (sulphate) acidity.
Between 1989 and 1998, UKAWMN reported a slow decline in sulphate
concentrations in some catchments in Wales and England despite the significant
reduction of sulphur oxides in the UK. UKAWMN (2001) attributed this to
REFERENCES
tland, . and Barlaup, B. (1995). Avoidance of toxic mixing zones by Atlantic
salmon (Salmo salar L.) and brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in the limed River
Audna, southern Norway. Environmental Pollution, 90(2), pp.203-208.
Bradley, D. and Ormerod, S. (2002). Long-term effects of catchment liming on
invertebrates in upland streams. Freshwater Biology, 47(1), pp.161-171.
Clair, T.A., Hindar, A., 2005. Liming for the mitigation of acid rain effects in freshwaters: a review of recent results. Environmental Reviews 13, 91-128.
Environment Protection Agency (EPA), (2016). Causes of Acid Rain. [online]
Available at: http://www3.epa.gov/region1/eco/acidrain/causes.html [Accessed 16
Jan. 2016].
Evans, C., Monteith, D., Reynolds, B. and Clark, J. (2008a). Buffering of recovery
from acidification by organic acids. Science of The Total Environment, 404(2-3),
pp.316-325.
Evans, C., Reynolds, B., Hinton, C., Hughes, S., Norris, D., Grant, S. and Williams,
B. (2008b). Effects of decreasing acid deposition and climate change on acid
extremes in an upland stream. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12(2), pp.337-351.
Forestry Commission, (2014). Forestry and surface water acidification. Forestry
Commission.