Professional Documents
Culture Documents
amasalme@sfu.ca
djng@sfu.ca
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
METHOD
We first began by using a Mercury vapour lamp to observe circular fringes. Then, by
rotating the micrometer, the mirror would move, causing fringes to expand or contract.
These quantities would be related to one another with the following equation:
2d = m
(1)
where = 546.07 nm for green Mercury vapour light, d is the mirror distance, and m is
the number of passing fringes.
We then replaced the Mercury vapour lamp with a Sodium lamp. Using the same technique and equation as with the Mercury vapour lamp, we calculated the mean wavelength
of Sodium light, N a .
We then observed that Sodium fringes became indistinguishable after the mirror has been
moved a certain distance. This was due to the beating signal between the two dominant
frequencies in Sodiums emission spectrum. We measured the average carriage distance
required to move through one full contrast cycle. This was related to the separation between
Sodiums dominant wavelengths by the following equation:
=
2
1 2
2d
(2)
where 1 and 2 are the two dominant wavelengths in the emission spectrum of Sodium.
The product 1 2 is the square geometric mean of these two wavelengths, and can be ap2
n=1+
III.
mp
2Lp
(3)
RESULTS
We calculated our K value to be 5.1 0.36. More accuracy would have been beneficial
in reducing the errors in all our other calculations. Nonetheless, this value seemed accurate
enough for our purposes.
We found our N a value to be equal to 588 0.4 nm. This is very close to the accepted
value of N a = 589.3 nm1 .
We found our value to be equal to 0.6 0.05 nm. This is very close to the accepted
value of = 0.60 nm1 .
Lastly, we found our n value to be equal to 1.00029 0.000006. This is extremely close
to the accepted value of n = 1.0002922 .