Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEMicircular
The College of Estate Management compiles this bulletin
for current and former students as an aid to your studies
and future careers.
CEMicircular covers all courses and includes
information about important developments and topical
issues in the world of surveying and property. You should
not, however, rely on the extracts in CEMicircular as your
only source of information. They will seldom offer more
than a brief summary of a new topic or recent issue and
some points are bound to be omitted, perhaps giving undue
emphasis to the material included. You are therefore urged
to read as widely as possible, including making use of the
Internet, and it is vitally important that current students
study the course material. This could make the difference
between superficial knowledge and real understanding.
To help you keep up to date, look out for the following
captions against items:
Editors note
The editor of this circular is Gaye Pottinger, Senior Research
Officer at CEM. She would be pleased to hear your views
and comments on its structure, content and presentation.
Contributions or suggestions of material for inclusion are
also welcome. Please write to Gaye Pottinger at the College
address below, or email to: k.g.pottinger@cem.ac.uk.
Subscription to CEMicircular
CEMicircular is produced twice a year, in the spring and
autumn. It is sent to all students on CEM courses, staff, CPD
subscribers and members of the Property Peoples Network
(PPN), which is open to CEM alumni. To join PPN see
www.ppnonline.co.uk.
Copyright
The extracts from journals in this circular are reproduced by
permission of the publishers. So as not to abuse this
permission, the College asks that anyone wishing to make
copies of any of the articles should first contact the editor of
CEMicircular.
Contents
Page
Building
Roof design
Siphonic drainage
Structural movement
2
5
6
12
14
Construction
Managing risk
Settling claims
Causation
Public procurement
15
16
17
18
19
21
24
Development
25
28
Finance
29
30
Law
Liability insurance
32
34
35
37
Management
Adverse possession
Service charges
39
41
Planning
Planning obligations
42
44
45
Property
46
47
Residential
48
49
52
Rural
A rural village
53
58
Valuation
Confidentiality of rents
60
61
62
Notices
New researchers
64
64
65
65
65
66
BUILDING
Building
Roof design
When designing a roof it is important to get the structure
right to ensure it will not collapse or blow away. This
article examines the basics of good design, including a look
at wind loading on photovoltaic panels and consideration of
snow loading. The relevant British Standards covering many
aspects of roof design are highlighted, plus the transitional
arrangements to new European standards that came into
effect at the end of 2004. The author, Keith Roberts, is a
chartered civil and structural engineer based in
Oxfordshire, UK, who specialises in roofing and cladding
(Architects Journal, aj focus, November 2004 pp.1923).
The interest in mounting solar-energy systems on the top of
exposed roofs has raised questions about the risk of them
blowing off. Experience tells us that lightweight
components, such as television aerials and satellite dishes,
are often the first to be damaged or come loose during a
severe wind storm. When placing lightweight photovoltaic
(PV) panels on a roof, it is important to ensure that they will
stay up there securely for the life-time of the building. The
Building Research Establishment (BRE) has recently
published Digest 489, giving recommendations for
calculating wind loading on PV panels.
The digest was published in August 2004 following work
undertaken as part of a Partners in Innovation (PII) project
funded by the Department of Trade and Industry. The PII
project team included manufacturers, PV specialists, trade
associations and the BRE.
To determine whether or not a solar panel will be blown
off a roof requires an estimate of the applied wind pressure,
which can then be used to check that the applied loads on the
fixings and roof structure below are not excessive. The
starting point is to determine the wind pressure for the site.
The digest helpfully gives a simplified method, based on a
minimum amount of information known about the site. For
example, the dynamic wind pressure for a 10m-tall building
on a level site in Nottingham would be 1.2kN/m2.
The digest gives recommendations for the coefficients of
pressure for PV modules mounted in four different ways.
The panels are usually aligned at a slope of around 350 to
the horizontal and facing south. The digest gives more
detailed information about the selection of the coefficients
and the assumptions made. Arrays of PV tiles are considered
to be air-permeable where the individual PV units are no
more than six times the area of the surrounding individual
roof tiles. For a solar panel mounted on a stand near the roof
edge, the peak coefficient of pressure would be 1.8, acting
in suction.
Knowing the dynamic pressure for the site, the
coefficient of pressure and the area of each PV module
allows you to calculate the design wind pressure. For the
worked example, the wind suction-loading acting on a single
solar panel each approximately 2 0.6m, or 1.2m2 in area,
mounted near the edge of the roof located in Nottingham
2
BUILDING
FURTHER INFORMATION
Approved Document A, Structure (2004 Edition), Building
Regulations (www.odpm.gov.uk)
BUILDING
Live
Wind
Snow
Services
Question: What are the magnitude and loading of the applied roof loads?
kN/m2
Uniformly distributed load (udl); point load on any square with 125mm side
Factors
Typical values
material, thickness
interlocking concrete roof tile = 0.480.55 kN/m2
1.2mm thick profiled steel sheet = 0.12 kN/m2
1.5mm PVC membrane = 0.03 kN/m2
with access
udl = 1.5 kN/m2 , point = 1.8 kN
no access
udl = 0.6 kN/m2 , point = 0.9 kN
location, altitude,
single-story pitch roof in London, field area = 0.7 kN/m2
topography, building height five-storey flat roof on hillside in Glasgow, eaves = 6 kN/m2
and shape, local zones
location, altitude, roof shape, Lowland England, udl = 0.3 kN/m2
obstructions to drifting
Highland Scotland, drifting = 8 kN/m2
lighting and other building
0.250.50 kN/m2
services, water tank
230 litre (50 gallon) = 2.3 kN/m2
Source
BS 6399 1 (2)
BS 6399 3 (4)
BS 6399 2 (3)
BS 6399 3 (4)
DECK
Why?
Components supported:
Load combinations:
What to check:
Source
BS 5268: Part 2 (5)
BS 5268: Part 2 (5)
BS 5268: Part 3 (6)
BS 5950: Part 5 (7)
BS 5950: Part 1
BS 8110 (9)
BUILDING
Siphonic drainage
Siphonic roof drainage systems were first installed in
Scandinavia in the late 1960s and are now used worldwide
as the best way to drain large roofs. Unfortunately, a
number of high profile failures in the 1990s caused doubts
about the performance of siphonic systems that are
misleading, because the problems were to do with poor
installations, explains Dr Malcolm Wearing, secretary of
the Siphonic Roof Drainage Association (SRDA)
(Architects Journal, aj focus, November 2004 pp.2632).
Siphonic drainage is actually very simple in principle, and
all systems work in exactly the same way. Baffle plates
inserted in the outlets restrict air entering the top of the
drainage system, which, when combined with carefully sized
pipework, causes the system, horizontal and vertical, to run
full.
In a very similar way to a simple tube siphon (such as
you would use to empty a fish tank), the action of water
dropping down the downpipe will cause a negative pressure
to form at the top. This pressure can be harnessed to suck
water along a collector pipe installed horizontally,
connecting the outlets at high level.
The benefits this gives are:
BUILDING
CemiCircular WebWatch
For more information on the association, or siphonic roof
drainage in general, email info@siphonic.org or visit
www.siphonic.org
Structural movement
This article is a version of Clive Richardsons annual
Christmas lecture to the RICS / College of Estate
Management Postgraduate Conservation Programme at
Reading in 2004. In it he reviews the seven causes of
structural movement by reference to changes in building
techniques over the centuries, and addresses the question:
should we be concerned about structural movement in
buildings?
Clive Richardson is a structural engineer and technical
director of Cameron Taylor, Bedord. He is also engineer to
the Dean and Chapter of Westminster Abbey, visiting
lecturer at the Architectural Association, and technical
secretary of the ICE/IStructE CARE Panel (Conservation
Accreditation Register for Engineers). (Building
Conservation Journal, Number 37, 2004, pp.6-11.)
Introduction
In the immediate post-war years, when we were grateful for
any accommodation which had survived the Blitz, attitudes
to odd cracks were relaxed. When redecorating, my father
would gleefully summon us children to see finger-wide
cracks discovered beneath the wallpaper, before
ceremoniously plugging them with newspaper and Polyfilla.
No panic attacks for him, whereas nowadays I am
increasingly called out to pronounce upon hairline plaster
cracks dramatised by white emulsion paint.
Expectations of building performance have become
unreasonably high. It is time for reactions to be tempered by
considering the issues.
The great forces of nature are capable of breaking down
mountains, so we must not assume that a mere building will
last indefinitely. Regular maintenance and occasional
structural intervention are essential to slow the process of
deterioration and to extend the life of a structure.
Intervention may be aimed at conserving a building
indefinitely, but a more realistic view may also be taken,
with finite expectations for both original fabric and repairs
(see Table 1).
What is structure?
Those parts of the building fabric which confer significant
strength, stability and integrity. Roof carcassing, floors,
walls, frameworks, and foundations form the principal
structural elements. Non-structural fabric such as plaster,
render, windows and doors can also help stiffen a structure,
but their contribution is not to be relied upon in a significant
way.
What is structural movement?
Subsidence, heave, sway, bouncy floors, bulging walls,
cracks, expansion and contraction are all forms of structural
movement. Such movement occurs all the time, and usually
its magnitude is so small that it passes unnoticed. Only when
movement threatens the use or safety of the structure need
we be concerned.
BUILDING
Movement
Fired clay brickwork
Sand-lime brickwork
(mm/m length of wall)
Permanent moisture
+ 0.6 (expansion)
0.25 (contraction)
content
Reversible moisture
0.2
0.3
movement
Reversible thermal
0.15
0.3
movement
Note:
Values given are average. See BRE Digest 228.
Values vary, depending upon exposure, restraint and pre-compression.
Movement is given for 30oC temperature range.
Portland stone is the Rolls-Royce of masonry materials for dimensional stability.
Concrete brickwork
0.6 (contraction)
Portland
limestone
Zero
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
Verticality divergence
Appropriate equipment
Water level
Spirit level
Dumpy level
Precise level (bar-coded staff)
Electrolevel
Giraffe
Plumb-line
Infra-red EDM (holographic prisms)
Tape extensometer
Perspex tell-tales
Vernier markers
Transducers (LVDT)
Equipment accuracy
25
2
12
0.20.4
0.01 degree
5
25
13
12
0.5
0.1
0.01
BUILDING
rot of timber
BUILDING
Table 4
is structure
sound?
no
eliminate
causes and
repair defects
yes
is use to
remain as
original?
will
structure be
overstressed
no
yes
yes
no
re-user
OK
strengthen
structure
BUILDING
used circumspectly.
Cracks should be examined to determine their cause, not
rigidly filled in to see if they reappear, as this may restrict
cyclical movement causing the problem to escalate. Careful
examination can reveal the direction of movement, and
whether movement is ongoing. (See sketch 4.)
In particular:
BUILDING
Sketch No 4
11
H
M C
E R
C A
E Historic
S
E
BUILDING
environments
and disabled access
BUILDING
CemiCircular WebWatch
The full research report Historic environments and tourism:
improving access for disabled people is available free from
the College of Estate Management website www.cem.ac.uk.
Hard copies can be purchased from CEM Publications.
13
BUILDING
14
Hand survey has its uses with small buildings and small
areas of detail, such as traceried windows. It has the
advantage that, through close inspection and measurement,
the surveyor gains a detailed understanding of the structure.
Instrument survey is good for rapid survey to produce a low
level of data. Total station theodolites now use reflectorless
technology, so inaccessible points can be plotted. Laser
scanning has the possibility of both rapid survey and high
level of detail, because a scan is able to capture a whole
series of points known as a point cloud. It is still in
development, as special computer programmes are needed to
read the massive amount of data generated, but has the
advantage of generating 3D modelling.
Of particular application to historic buildings and to
archaeology are the photographic survey methods.
Rectified photography and photogrammetry are used where
the irregular detail on elevations needs to be detailed. They
are good at producing stone-by-stone records of buildings
for archaeological analysis. Rectified photography uses
standard medium- or large-format cameras. The images are
then enlarged to scale. Photogrammetry combines
photography with CAD, using a stereo viewer to extract
survey information from photographs using specialist
cameras. It is not a cheap option but produces high quality
results.
There are other methods which do not fall readily into
these categories, such as radar surveying techniques, useful
in locating hidden features such as chimney flues. Case
studies illustrate the use of the techniques described.
The problem with any assessment of particular tools is
that they will soon be superseded as technology advances,
but this book very usefully details the survey methods
available with their advantages and disadvantage. It is very
well illustrated, but use it as a reference work, not a
textbook.
CemiCircular WebWatch
Dallas R (Ed) (2004) Measured Survey and Building
Recording for Historic Buildings and Structures can be
obtained from Historic Scotland (22.50). The book
comprises 9 chapters, 180 pages and 184 illustrations. For
more details go to: http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/
product_detail.htm?productid=639
CONSTRUCTION
Construction
Defined provisional sums
What is the difference between a defined provisional sum
in the JCT98 contracts and an undefined one? Ann
Minogue, partner with solicitors Linklaters, explains that it
has nothing to do with price certainty (Building, 3
December 2004, p.49).
As a novice to building contracts I was baffled by the
jargon used in them. For example, I had no idea what was
meant by the term provisional sum. It soon became
obvious that it was synonymous with black hole. The sum
was no more than a figure inserted by the professional team.
If the work covered by it was to be carried out, an
instruction had to be issued; that instruction was then valued
as a variation; and extensions of time and loss and expense
claims could then follow.
So what is the point of provisional sums? Presumably it
is to forestall criticism about increases in the contract sum.
Does the employer ever understand that the contract sum
and the date for completion include these black holes? The
answer in my experience is almost always no.
Still more mysterious jargon has since been included in
the JCT standard form in relation to provisional sums.
JCT98 includes a distinction between a defined provisional
sum and an undefined one. Probably only quantity
surveyors expert in the standard method of measurement can
explain the difference exactly, but the distinction seems to be
that, for defined work, there is enough information in the
contract to enable the contractor to price preliminary items,
to allow for the work in its programme and to assess its
impact on other work. But if that is the case, then surely it is
also possible to price the work itself?
Take the example of a reception desk an item
commonly covered by a provisional sum. The argument is
I think that the contractor can anticipate the preliminaries
and programme issues arising from the supply and
installation of a reception desk even though it does not know
the precise details of the desk to be supplied. So a defined
provisional sum is inserted.
15
CONSTRUCTION
Managing risk
Its better to face up to construction risks than ignore them,
says Tony Bingham, barrister and arbitrator. The question
is, do you take the umbrella approach or the mushroom
approach, or one of the other four ways to manage risk?
(Building, 27 August 2004, pp.4849)
Heaven knows your construction work is heaving, bubbling
over with risk. There is a real chance that the job will make
a loss, that you will get the blame, that the firm will go bust.
In fact, there is so much risk that it is best not to think about
it.
No, no. Stop turning a blind eye to bloody risks. Turn
that idea on its head lick risk by looking it in the eye,
then managing it to make it more likely not to happen. This
is where a University of Reading report, commissioned by
the RICS, comes in handy. Its called The Management of
Risk Yours, Mine and Ours.
Now the RICS must be fed up with being kicked in the
groin; time for a pat on the back. And if this RICS president
fella Barry Gilbertson really does want to get his members
back to a sense of belonging, do something really useful,
old chap. Take that theme in your report and help every
RICS builder, QS, manager, measurer, valuer to get good at
making it more likely that good things will happen. And do
it within their membership fee. In other words, for free.
The RICS report says risks are inherent in all
construction projects. Yes, yes, they can be transferred,
accepted, managed, minimised or shared but they must not
be ignored. The traditional way of insulating yourself from
risk is to treat it as another four-letter word and pass the
price to the consumer. Another tradition, says the RICS, is to
play off the subcontractors against each other to gain the
cheapest price. The report says, taking on a risk at bid stage
in the hope of passing it on to somebody else is folly in
todays business environment.
Apparently there are five ways to tackle risk (I think
there are six):
16
CemiCircular WebWatch
The report referred to, The management of risk: Yours, mine
and ours, commissioned by the RICS Project Management
Faculty from the University of Reading, can be found at the
RICS members website at this link: www.rics.org/
Management/Projectmanagement.
CONSTRUCTION
Settling claims
17
CONSTRUCTION
Causation
Did the building of the London Underground Jubilee Line
cause the pipe to burst, or would it have happened anyway?
Susan Lindsey, barrister at Crown Office Chambers,
discusses how the but for test can be used to exclude things
that are not a cause, but is still not a reliable test of
causation (Architects Journal, 11 November 2004, p.48).
For 75 years the 36-inch cast-iron water main under St
Thomas Street, Southwark, served its function, taking in its
stride the vicissitudes of life (Thames Water v London
Regional Transport; judgment 18 August 2004). Then,
between 1995 and 1997, London Underground built the new
Jubilee Line nearby. On 24 October 1999 the pipe suddenly
failed, giving rise to claims that amounted to many millions
of pounds.
Thames Water blamed London Underground (LU),
alleging it had compromised the ground support for the
main, causing damage to the pipe. LU opposed the claim,
saying the pipe was so loaded already by historic stresses
and strains that its actions were simply the straw that broke
the camels back. That, it said, was not sufficient to give rise
to a legal liability.
Similar arguments might arise in the context of a building
contract to carry out works to an existing building. For
example, unbeknown to a contractor, previous works may
have seriously compromised the structure. As soon as the
builder starts work, damage results, triggered by the new
work. Other issues arise, including what the contractor is
obliged to do and what it should and could have noticed
before starting work. But how does a court approach
questions of causation of damage in such cases?
In Thames Water, HHJ Wilcox took the well-known
starting point of what is called the but for test. At first sight
this appears a useful and straightforward test. If but for the
defendants actions the damage would not have occurred,
then the defendant is liable. But the test runs into problems,
particularly when there is more than one possible cause of
damage.
The judge referred, among other authorities, to Lord
Hoffmans speech in Banque Bruxelles Lambert v Eagle
Star, the well-known case about the extent of damages
payable by a valuer who negligently over-values property
that turns out to be inadequate security, in part because of a
18
E
CONSTRUCTION
S
19
CONSTRUCTION
20
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
valley directly above the river. The solution was to erect the
pylon and stay cables on the leading section of each half of the
deck only to provide support for this final section. As the river
is on the north side of the valley, 1743m of deck was launched
from the south side, and 717m from the north.
The deck was fabricated in sections by Eiffage steelwork
subsidiary Eiffel at its two factories. These sections were
brought to site and welded together on a production line at
each end of the bridge to form a complete, painted deck
section with the balustrade pre-fitted. After three weeks the
171m long sections, enough to span between pier and
temporary support, were finished.
A special weather forecast was made to ensure that average
windspeeds did not exceed 35km/h over the next four days
prior to launching the deck over the void.
The biggest problem was how to slide the deck over the
piers. You couldnt push too hard horizontally on the piers as
this would damage them, says Jean Pierre Gerner, Eiffels
director of works responsible for the deck. The answer came in
the form of 64 devices called translators positioned on top of
the piers and the temporary supports. Devised by US specialist
Enerpac, these are computer-controlled, synchronised
hydraulic transfer jacks that lift the deck slightly, push it along
by 600mm, drop it again, then repeat the process. This moved
the deck along at a rate of 10m/h so it took two days for the
deck to move the full 171m to the next support.
The biggest concern was that the deck would become stuck
between its supports during the launching operation. The
worst-case scenario was that the deck would get stuck 5m
before it reached the support, says Gerner. We had an
emergency system to make it safe ... but it never got stuck.
On 28 May 2004 the two halves of the deck met 270m
above the Tarn with a difference of only 10mm, according to
Legrand.
After welding the two halves of the deck together, the next
stage was to lift the steel pylons into place and attach the
cables to permanently support the deck. The temporary
supports were then dismantled and clear plastic aerofoils
attached to the balustrade to deflect the winds that whistle up
the valley while allowing drivers a view over the sides.
Lighting is installed inside the split piers to subtly illuminate
the bridge it has no other lighting, in order to minimise its
impact on the landscape. Six kilometres north of the viaduct is
the high-tech toll collection and command centre.
PROJECT TEAM
Commissioning authority
The French Government
Project owner and operator and main contractor
Compagnie Eiffage du Viaduc de Millau
Architect
Foster and Partners
Project manager
Setec, SNCF
Civil engineers
Eiffage TP, EEG-Simecsoc
Structural steel engineer
Greisch
Concrete contractor
Eiffage TP
Steelwork contractor
Eiffel
23
CONSTRUCTION
Public procurement
A European Court of Justice ruling on 11 January 2005
affects the awarding of public service contracts. This update
is from Law-Now, the on-line Information service of law
firm CMS Cameron McKenna, and is reproduced with their
kind permission.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on 11 January
2005 that public bodies cannot award public service
contracts to companies which they own jointly with private
investors, regardless of the percentage of public holding,
unless they have first held a tender process. This means that
such contracts must be awarded in accordance with the EU
procurement rules which require formal invitations to tender.
In Stadt Halle and RPL Recyclingpark Lochau GmbH v
TREA Leuna, a disgruntled competitor challenged the award
by the City of Halle of a contract to design a waste disposal
plant. The contract had been given to a company in which
the City of Halle had a 75.1% shareholding (the rest being
held by private investors) without formally issuing a call for
tenders.
Note that this decision relates to contracts awarded by
public bodies, not by utilities. There is no provision in either
the current or the new public services contracts directive
which mirrors the provision in the current and the new
utilities rules allowing the award of certain contracts to
affiliated undertakings without the need for a tender process.
The ECJs ruling also confirmed that such challenges are
not barred by the fact that the award decision was taken
outside a formal award procedure and prior to a formal
invitation to tender. The court stated that as soon as the
24
CemiCircular WebWatch
DEVELOPMENT
Development
Affordable housing quotas
The government is determined to achieve a dramatic
increase in affordable housing provision and commercial
developers must do their bit.
No longer can they make their contribution in the form of
cash payments to planning authorities. Increasingly they are
required to build the affordable housing themselves, as part
of residential or mixed-use schemes, even if they have little
experience of this market.
This policy has created growing demand for advice from
valuation and planning surveyors. Companies that develop
property, such as Prudential Property Investment Managers
(PruPIM), which is building a mixed-use scheme with 600
houses at GreenPark near Reading (see panel) want to know
how much they will be paid for the affordable housing, and
they need guidance through the morass of quotas, grants and
policy initiatives that go with the territory.
GVA Grimley formed an affordable housing unit 18
months ago. Led by GVAs head of planning Stephen Brown,
it is expected to double in size from 12 specialists in 18
months. Similarly, the residential team at Drivers Jonas,
which includes valuers, building surveyors and project
managers, has grown from 10 to 15 in the last 12 months.
This is a good market for consultants because of all the
grey areas and uncertainties, notes Chris Baldwin, valuation
partner at Drivers Jonas. People need to draw on experts for
advice.
The imposition of a 50% affordable housing target in
Westminster last month, the launch of a pilot scheme to
channel money direct to developers instead of through
housing associations, and the drafting of new planning
guidance (see panel) will all add to the demand for advice.
At Drivers Jonas, valuers are advising developers on how
much they are likely to be paid for the affordable housing
element of a scheme. Baldwin says 40 developers have
contacted him in the last 12 months wanting answers to this
question, which can make or break their plans. They are
usually either considering a bid for a site with an affordable
housing requirement or have already bought the site and are
exploring their options.
Housing partners
Unfortunately, there are no easy answers. Much depends on
whether the developer can join forces with a housing
association that has grant funding available to pay for the
housing. The Housing Corporation distributes this grant to
housing associations every two years.
Drivers Jonas will try to identify housing associations
that a developer can partner with on a particular scheme.
Ideally this takes place six months before a planning
application is submitted, Baldwin says. His department
claims in-depth knowledge of the field because it has worked
with housing associations for 15 years; historically it
provided loan security valuations to housing associations
when they wanted to raise money.
DEVELOPMENT
26
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
28
FINANCE
Finance
Cross border investment and
due diligence
Crossborder investment activity in Europe is on the
increase and with it a common approach to technical due
diligence has emerged, together with investor interest in
vendors packs. Jo Stocks, managing partner of property
and construction consultant Watts & Partners, examines the
trend and the implications for UK property professionals
selling services in mainland Europe (Property Week, 10
September 2004, p.47).
European investment volumes could reach their highest
recorded level in 2004 and total e89bn (60bn) by the end of
the year. More than a third of this is accounted for by crossborder activity and, says research by Jones Lang LaSalle,
that interest is mainly focused on Spain, France and
Belgium.
My experience supports this conclusion. Around 60% of
my firms clients in Europe fall into the cross-border or
global category and most appear to be turning their attention
to France, the Netherlands and Spain, where industrial,
retail, office and residential property are all on the lists of
investors.
The growing popularity of European transactions has
brought with it the acceptance of due diligence as a common
service standard across the continent.
In the Spanish market, German and Dutch investment
funds have introduced dynamism by looking at a wider range
of sectors. Traditionally, the main investors have been real
estate companies or funds linked to large development
corporations, banks or insurance companies. Their primary
interest has been big buildings located in the main cities.
Now, however, attention has turned to industrial
developments, logistic units, shopping centres and business
districts in the suburbs. Indigenous investors are following
suit and are looking for non-residential opportunities.
The huge acceptance of sale-and-leaseback transactions
is attracting interest from traditional businesses that
recognise the opportunity to liquidate funds that will allow
them to make new investments.
Property consultants working for international and panEuropean clients note the emergence of a common service
standard where, in particular, technical due diligence is
crucial.
In many European countries, this process has not been
associated with property purchase, or at least not to anything
like the level of detail that in the last few decades has
become commonplace in the UK and US. In France, where
everything is governed by the Napoleonic Code, investors
have historically relied on insurance to safeguard them
against property-related problems rather than carry out
technical due diligence before purchase.
In Spain, a tasador is appointed to provide a building
valuation and a limited technical assessment. However, this
is a description of the property rather than a report of its
condition.
Devil in the detail
The big international investors are not willing to accept this
laissez-faire approach, and this is where technical due
diligence comes into its own. Consultants offering the
service not only look in detail at the condition of a property
asset but also ensure the buildings compliance with statutory
requirements. Vendors as well as purchasers are now
showing an interest in technical due diligence, which takes
the form of a vendors pack that can be made available to
prospective buyers and contains all the relevant reports.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that this growth in technical
due diligence is resulting in what we in the UK would
consider a more professional approach to property
transactions in local markets too, as smaller investors follow
the lead of their international counterparts.
However, this does not mean that UK consultants can
simply export their services into mainland Europe and
expect to succeed in local markets. Perhaps more than ever
before it is vital to understand the individual cultural
differences that exist and adapt the services on offer
accordingly.
Each nation state has its own traditions and often
complex local property regulations and legislation. Only
those with detailed local knowledge, as well as the ability to
provide clients with the comfort of the same type and level
of information that they are used to at home, will succeed in
what is now an increasingly sophisticated marketplace.
29
FINANCE
FINANCE
Does the lease allow the lessee to cancel the lease, and
if so does the lessee have to bear the lessors losses, as
predetermined in the lease terms?
31
LAW
Law
Confidentiality and legal
privilege
A recent decision in the UK House of Lords has set new
boundaries to legal privilege, which provides a protective
cloak against the usual requirements to disclose documents
to the other party to a dispute. Katie Bradford, partner, and
Ben Hatton, associate solicitor, in the property and finance
litigation group at Linklaters, explain the nature of legal
privilege and warn that creating a document that falls
outside this protection can lead to serious consequences
(Estates Gazette, 4 December 2004, pp. 126128). (Also
see items on the new UK Freedom of Information Act and on
Confidentiality of rents in the Valuation section of this
issue of CEMicircular).
In Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England [2004]
UKHL 48; The Times 12 November 2004, the House of
Lords set the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege.
Documents that fall outside this remit may need to be
disclosed. But what does disclosure entail, and what exactly
is privilege?
What is disclosure?
Orders for disclosure require a party, in both litigation and
arbitration (but not expert determination), to disclose the
existence of relevant documents to the other side. The
documents may then be examined and used in the dispute.
Business confidentiality is no defence. The requirement
includes documents that:
32
LAW
33
LAW
Liability insurance
The decision in a recent case, involving a claim by Bovis
against its insurer, provides a dire warning that while
liability insurance might seem to offer contractors a degree
of comfort, the extent of their liability needs to be precisely
established. John Murdoch, professor of law, Reading
University, discusses the significance of the ruling for the
construction industry and beyond (Estates Gazette, 4
December 2004, p.133).
Key points
LAW
LAW
Conclusions
The differences between the two systems are significant. But
it is important to consider whether these lead to
incompatibility. Arguably, the EU context is all-important. Is
it necessary for the systems to cohere, and to what extent has
this already been achieved?
Various Acts and treaties suggest convergence,
particularly those behind institutions aimed at building
Europe as an economic, political, social and even military
union. The European Convention on Human Rights 1950,
the Treaty of Rome 1957 and subsequent treaties, and the
decisions of the ECJ have all furthered co-operation. They
have been drafted primarily with civil law principles and
procedures in mind. This may not suit all common law
jurists, although few today are as sceptical as Lord Denning.
England (and the UK) could become isolated by its
reliance on the common law system. But it seems likely that
the common law approach will modify EU law and that both
traditions will have to adapt in order to embrace the law of
Europe. Perhaps the differences between the two approaches
are not so fundamental. As R David and J E C Brierley
(1985) stated nearly 50 years ago (see p.112 of Major legal
systems in the world today (3rd edn):
The difference between the two families of systems
today is less one of different conceptions of law and its
role in society than it is one of the different techniques
utilized to create a social order founded on the same
basic premises and directed to the same goals.
LAW
The UK Freedom of
Information Act
On 1 January 2005 a general right of access to information
held by public bodies in the UK came into being. This
means that the many and varied dealings between public
bodies, private businesses and individuals previously
undisclosed are now open to greater public access. In the
property and construction sectors this could include matters
relating to planning, building contracts, professional
services and property transactions, although certain
commercially sensitive information can still be protected.
This article, covering the main features of the Act, is from
the website of law firm CMS Cameron McKenna,
www.law-now.com, and is reproduced with their kind
permission.
Introduction
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) came fully
into force on 1 January 2005. The Act gives individuals or
businesses from any part of the world a general right of
access to any information held by a public authority in the
UK, including information held prior to the Act coming into
force.
The Act creates a risk that commercially sensitive
information could become available to competitors or public
interest groups. Any businesses dealing with public
authorities should therefore be concerned to minimise the
risk of disclosure of their confidential information by a
public authority. The other side of the coin is that the Act
provides businesses with an opportunity to discover more
about their competitors and relevant government policies.
The general right to information
The Act provides a right of access to all recorded
information held by public authorities, subject to certain
exemptions. Any person making a request for information to
a public authority is entitled:
37
LAW
38
Contacts:
If you have any further questions on this article or the
ramifications of the Freedom of Information Act in general,
please contact:
CemiCircular WebWatch
MANAGEMENT
Management
Adverse possession
In the UK adverse possession is more usually thought of in
terms of squatters who have moved into a property and
managed to stay in occupation unchallenged for at least 12
years. However, adverse possession can also be a landlords
nightmare, due to a lesser known provision in the Limitation
Act 1980. Guy Fetherstonhaugh, barrister at Falcon
Chambers, and Simon Woodhead, barrister at Mills &
Reeve, review the provisions and provide a glimmer of hope
(Estates Gazette, 11 September 2004, pp.138139).
In recent times, squatters have enjoyed some notorious
success in the courts. This ranges from the formerly unlawful
(but now landed) inhabitants of Lambeths ignored housing
stock (LambethLondon Borough Council v Blackburn
[2001] EWCA Civ 912; (2001) 82 P&CR 494), to the
successful appellants (and now owners of valuable
development land in Oxfordshire) rewarded for their
perseverance by the House of Lords in JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd
v Graham [2002] UKHL 30; [2003] 1 AC 419. Such
squatters have acquired title by virtue of 12 years adverse
possession, pursuant to section 15 of, and paras 1 and 8 of
Schedule 1 to the Limitation Act 1980.
Schedule 1 also contains a less well-known provision,
although one that is used to equally devastating effect.
Paragraph 5 (see box) allows title to be acquired where a
tenant under an oral periodic tenancy stops paying rent, and
12 years pass with the tenant remaining in possession. At the
expiry of that 12-year period, the tenant not merely escapes
all liability for the previous six years rent (the first six years
being barred in any event by section 19 of the 1980 Act),
but, to add grave insult to slight injury, also becomes entitled
to its landlords title to the land in question.
Rent Act-protected tenants
Where the occupant is protected by the Rent Acts, it may be
thought that this melancholy result would not arise, not least
because the landlords remedies are constrained by the Rent
Act legislation. But not so. In a number of cases decided by
the Court of Appeal, it has been held that the fact that
statutes such as the Rent Acts confer security of tenure on
the occupier of land does not prevent that occupier acquiring
title under the Limitation Acts in the same way as any other
occupier.
In the leading authority, Moses v Lovegrove [1952] 2 QB
533, the defendant, who was a tenant under an oral weekly
tenancy, made his last payment of rent to the landlord in
1938. In 1939, the premises were brought within the
provisions of the Rent Restriction Acts. In 1952, the landlord
issued possession proceedings. The defendant claimed that
the landlords title had been extinguished by the Limitation
Act 1939. The landlord contended that the defendants
adverse possession had ceased with the commencement of
the rent restriction legislation, because the landlord then had
no right to recover possession.
39
MANAGEMENT
Mr Perry argued that the Rent Act cases applied with equal
force to a business tenancy protected by the 1954 Act. The
housing association responded that, although both statutes
conferred security of tenure upon tenants, they operated in
ways that were critically different for the purposes of
Schedule 1 to the 1980 Act. In particular, the 1954 Act
prevents the right of action to recover land from accruing,
with the result that the limitation period cannot begin to run
in cases to which it applies.
The relevant provisions are contained in section 24(1),
which provides that a tenancy to which this Part of this Act
applies shall not come to an end unless terminated in
accordance with the provisions of this Part of this Act, and
section 64, which provides for the date specified in the
section 25 notice to be substituted by a later date, being
three months after the date of final disposal of the tenants
application to court for the grant of a new tenancy and not
at any other time. To put it another way, it is implicit that
para 5 of Schedule 1 applies only to periodic tenancies that
in the ordinary way are terminable by notice to quit. The
combined effect of sections 24(1) and 64 of the 1954 Act is
that a landlord cannot determine a business tenancy simply
by serving an ordinary notice to quit.
Judge Cowell accepted the housing associations
arguments and held that it was implicit in sections 15 and 17
of, and para 5(1) of Schedule 1 to, the 1980 Act that there
should be a right of action to recover land (section 15(1))
and a period during which a landowner may bring an action
to recover land (section 17) and, more particularly, a right
of action on the part of a person entitled to the land subject
to the tenancy. The judge concluded:
[F]or paragraph 5(1) to apply there must be not only, as
here, a tenancy from year to year or other period (in this
case a weekly period) without a lease in writing, but there
must also be no impediment precluding the determination
of the tenancy, that being an essential feature without
which the right of action to recover the land cannot arise.
In short, the paragraph presupposes that the tenancy is
one determinable by notice to quit. In 1939 there may
well have been or were no such periodic tenancies
without a lease in writing which were not determinable
by notice to quit; at any rate the usual tenancy was so
determinable.
40
MANAGEMENT
Service charges
The traditional floor-area-based method of calculating
service charges in multi-let buildings is out of date and the
time has come for an update, argues Edward FenwickMoore, associate at Hartnell Taylor Cook (Property Week,
7 January 2005, p.30).
The correct apportionment of service charges among
occupiers in a multi-tenanted commercial scheme is often
overlooked and can become a cause for disputes between
landlord and tenant.
Traditional methods, whereby expenditure is apportioned
according to floor area, might sometimes be unfair for
example, in the case where an anchor tenant pays a reduced
service charge rate as a reward for taking more space.
The basic principles of the apportionment of expenditure
have been well established in Service Charges in
Commercial Property A Guide to Good Practice (the
Guide).
Modern leases generally provide for a fair and
reasonable apportionment of service charge expenditure,
based on the physical size, nature of use and the benefit to
the occupier of particular costs in accordance with the terms
of the Guide.
However, the Guide was last updated in 2000 and the
trading habits of occupiers, particularly those in mixed-use
retail and leisure schemes, have evolved since then.
Hartnell Taylor Cook has been advising clients on several
mixed-use retail and leisure schemes where new methods of
apportionment are being considered. They include
restaurants, health and fitness clubs, casinos and cinemas, as
well as conventional shops.
More often than not, mixed-use retail and leisure
occupiers trade at different times of day for example, a
casino will operate mainly at night and a conventional shop
during the day.
In addition, some tenants will benefit to a greater or
lesser extent from a particular service to the common or
retained areas of the scheme.
41
PLANNING
Planning
PPG3: Planning for mixed
communities
In January 2005 the UK government issued a consultation
paper on the proposed Planning Policy Guidance Note 3
(PPG3) which offers developers more influence on local
housing and greater freedom to meet market needs. A news
item by Gwyn Roberts from Property Week (4 February
2005, p.53), is followed by the letter issued by ODPM on 24
January 2004 inviting responses to the consultation by 15
April 2005.
Developers could be about to be given a much greater say in
local planning if a PPG3 consultation paper issued by the
ODPM last week receives popular assent.
If the Planning for Mixed Communities consultation
paper is approved, housebuilders will be able to build
according to market need rather than to the strictures of local
authorities. They will also be fully integrated into the
preparation of local housing assessments.
House-builders have broadly welcomed the proposals.
The government seems to have realised that it had been
allowing local authorities to dictate the size and affordability
of housing, said Pierre Williams of the Housebuilders
Federation. This is prescriptive and goes against what most
people aspire to.
However, some developers are concerned that the
consultation document could drag smaller developers into
the affordable housing arena.
If projects of 1215 properties become liable for the
provision of affordable housing, as suggested in the
consultation paper, some are concerned that an important
area of supply may dry up.
A house-building source said: Not only could this limit
sites but it could snare up the system with an increased
amount of negotiations between builders and local planners.
Planning for Mixed Communities follows on from a 2003
consultation that found there were clear differences between
local authorities and developers on the subject of how to
build the correct mix of housing.
During this earlier consultation process, ministers felt
that local authorities had ignored a demand-driven approach
in favour of a housing supply based on size and type of
homes.
Many felt that this approach was restrictive and took no
account of the particular circumstances of the site and the
housing market at the planning application stage.
In the case of market housing it was also felt that this
approach could deter developers from providing housing.
The consultation document suggests that although
affordable housing should still be based on size and type,
local authorities will no longer be able to select the housing
association.
Private housing could also benefit from a revised
approach that will focus on market conditions.
42
PLANNING
PLANNING
Planning obligations
A UK government consultation on proposed reform to the
system of planning obligations, which enable local
authorities to require developers to undertake supporting
works and infrastructure, came to a close on 25 January. In
this article Martin Edwards, specialist planning barrister in
39 Essex Street Chambers, and John Martin, solicitor and
director of property law research at Pinsent Masons,
speculate on the impact of possible changes (Estates
Gazette, 11 December 2004, p.82). The outcome will be
covered in a future edition of CEMicircular.
Key points
44
PLANNING
45
PROPERTY
Property
Actors and property
From spatial awareness to training, actors are playing a
part in helping property people improve their performance,
says Adam Tinworth (Estates Gazette, 27 November 2004,
pp.122123).
What on earth could actors have to do with property? The
former specialise in the creation of the illusory, transporting
people into the realms of fiction. The latter is a bricks n
mortar business, dealing with the tangible reality of the built
environment.
However, there is an overlap, and more people are
drawing actors into the property industry. For one thing,
actors specialise in turning empty spaces into realistic
places, with only a handful of props to help. They can
perform within a space that does not exist and, by interacting
with it in a realistic way, convince people of its existence.
Show and tell
On the most prosaic level, canny building marketers have
used actors to create a sense of what unlet buildings could be
like in use. Land Securities Landflex team made extensive
use of actors during the launch of the Empress State building
in Londons Earls Court last year, for example.
At a more advanced level, Howard Morgan of Kingsley
Lipsey Morgan has been working with Marcus Freed of City
Drama to use actors in training for the property trade and
associated industries. The idea is to take the dreaded role
play out of training, and let professionals act out different
scenarios instead, in a series of events called Property
Live!. A combination of scripted scenes and improvised
interactions between actors in character following the
suggestions of the audience can help them understand the
relationship between property professional and customer.
While they may sound experimental, the sessions have
been running for four years, and satisfied clients include
such respectable property names as the Crown Estate, Land
Securities and Nabarro Nathanson.
Actors have an understanding of space that we lack. In a
one-day seminar last month, Jones Lang LaSalle looked at
this, bringing academics who specialise in theatre to talk to
both JLL people and their clients, along with one faintly
bemused journalist. The academics, who included Simon
Shepherd and Simon Macklin of the Central School of
Drama and Professor Mick Wallis of the University of
Leeds, made it plain that this wasnt an untested theory but
was based on serious research into the way people perceive
spatial use and relationships.
The Leading Edge series are forums for sharing
knowledge and ideas which are practical in application,
explains Francesca Hughes, European director of strategic
consulting at JLL. She describes some of the earlier sessions
of the day, including Stanhopes Stuart Liptons talk on
looking at workspace in a different way.
46
PROPERTY
47
RESIDENTIAL
Residential
Evicting tenants and mental
health
The provisions of the UK Disability Discrimination Act 1995
have become relevant in relation to possession proceedings
against residential tenants under housing legislation. Sandi
Murdoch, senior lecturer in law, Reading University,
examines recent cases and explains that evicting tenants on
grounds of anti-social behaviour can be difficult if they
suffer from a mental illness and can be done only if they
endanger others (Estates Gazette, 23 October 2004, p.141).
Key points
48
RESIDENTIAL
49
RESIDENTIAL
50
RESIDENTIAL
CemiCircular WebWatch
51
RESIDENTIALH
M C
E R
C A
E
Right
S
E
to Buy valuations
52
CemiCircular WebWatch
This valuation report has been published online by the Office
of the Deputy Prime Minister: www.odpm.gov.uk
It can also be accessed via the CEM website at
www.cem.ac.uk
RURAL
Rural
Valuing wildlife, recreation and
leisure
Diversification has become a common feature of rural
businesses that are increasingly unable to rely wholly on
agriculture and other traditional sectors for a long-term
livelihood. So how important is wildlife to local economies,
in terms of generating income from tourism, leisure and
recreation activities? The issues arising from this question
are explored in this paper by Dr Ian Rotherham, Simon
Doncaster and Dave Egan of Sheffield Hallam University
(Countryside Recreation, Vol 12 No.1 Spring 2004, pp.12
19).
Preamble
The Wildlife Leisure Industry is often neglected and
overlooked in concept or reality. Yet its importance to
environmental conservation and hence sustainability, and
increasingly for local economies, is significant. More
recently, too, there is increased awareness of the value of
wildlife-based recreational activities in helping to deliver
improved health at all levels physical, emotional and
psychological. Attempting to tease apart the trends and
issues is not easy, and wildlife experiences, resources and
services are intimately interlaced with those of heritage
landscapes, archaeology, and general outdoor activities.
A quick look at the economics confirms this importance.
In the USA nature conservation, and associated wildlife
leisure and tourism, are massive. Southwick Associates
(1994) estimated that each year in the USA, 24 million
people go bird-watching. They spend more than $5 billion,
helping to employ 190,000 workers. In Australia, tourism
activities concerned with the Great Barrier Reef earn $90
million per year; whilst in Florida, reef-based activities are
worth around $1.6 million (Eber, 1992). The Galapagos
Islands World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve in 1989
had 32,500 visitors, with around 50,000 per year expected
by 2000 (Shackley, 1996).
These figures present a picture of a very major industry.
They also bring into sharp focus the ecological and indeed
economic risks if exploitation is not carefully managed to be
sustainable. It is therefore surprising that these key issues
seem to hold little sway with policy-makers and planners
when it comes to protecting locally important wildlife sites.
Similarly there are serious issues in terms of lack of
support or in investment in our nature conservation services
and advisors those that deliver much of this important
resource. A quick look at the employment figures for local
authorities, or at their staff structures and development
reviews, or even of our National Parks, and the numbers and
status of, say, ecologists, archaeologists, countryside
managers and rangers, does not make for encouraging
reading. And yet it is within these areas of work that the
basis for an important market sector is visioned, assessed,
managed, protected and promoted.
RURAL
RURAL
RURAL
RURAL
Contact details
Key references
Full details of references given in the text are provided in the
following papers:
57
RURAL
A rural village
Poundbury in Dorset, created Prince Charles, is a rural
village like no other, says Graham Norwood. Strict controls
on design, construction and management is leading to
higher property values than adjacent areas and attracting
wide interest in the schemes success (Estates Gazette, 27
November 2004 pp.121122).
Poundbury, the Prince of Wales sustainable development
dream in Dorset, is attracting the attention of investors,
retirees, developers and the deputy prime minister.
In 1988 the Duchy of Cornwall appointed renowned
master-planner Leon Krier to create a vision for the 420-acre
site on the western edge of Dorchester. Construction began
in 1993 after extensive public consultation.
Phase 1, a 168-acre site, was completed in 2002 by local
builders committed to the principles of sustainability. Some
220 homes, a pub, a caf and shops were created, but it is the
appearance, layout and materials that make this development
like no other.
The Commission for Architecture and the Built
Environment (CABE) described its colours as muted and
soft.
However, the schemes life has not been easy compared
to those of mainstream developments. Builders know they
are being supervised, at least indirectly, by the Prince of
Wales mechanism to vet designs and standards.
Building plots are sold off separately and controlled via a
legally binding agreement with each developer before the
freehold is released. Some 20% of phase 1 homes were
social housing, with 35% of social housing in phase 2, and
this may be higher in later phases. The Poundbury Building
Code, covering facade design and materials, applied to phase
1 buildings, but a stricter design guidance document applies
to all future phases.
Poundburys management company Manco is funded by
a 100 per household contribution from residents, plus a
small levy on any profits enjoyed by owners who sell and
leave the area. It represents owner-occupier residents and the
tenants of commercial units. It was set up to supervise
maintenance of open spaces, right down to communal
courtyards and garages, and to monitor long-term
development.
Meet the stipulations
A raft of legal and management agreements has been applied
to control long-term change. These include the stipulations,
which extend the influence of Manco over matters regarded
elsewhere as permitted development, and therefore not
requiring planning permission or extensive consultation.
Therefore, Manco applies the design guidance and
prevents visual disfigurement of the carefully created
architectural harmony, according to its constitution.
Such is the price of sustainable perfection, but there have
been hiccups along the way.
A group called Poundbury Residents Opposed to Density
protested when local builder Woodpecker Properties sought
agreement for 31 affordable housing flats at a density
58
It contains 220 homes in 21 property types (mainly threeand four-bedroom terraced and detached houses), a pub,
shops and caf in the village centre.
RURAL
The building strategy must incorporate energyconservation features such as insulation, double glazing,
condensing boilers and water meters; all services,
including telephone, electricity, gas and drainage, are
housed in single channels in each courtyard at the rear of
properties; and terrestrial and digital television is cabled
to every house.
59
VALUATION
Valuation
Confidentiality of rents
The case discussed here by Jonathan Ross, head of property
litigation at Forsters, provides an example of the way a
confidentiality clause was successfully employed in a
tenancy agreement to prevent disclosure of a rent in relation
to a rent review (Property Week, 3 December 2004, p.52).
Although such clauses may therefore become more popular,
they do not necessarily offer complete protection (also see
article on Confidentiality and legal privilege in the Law
section of this issue of CEMicircular).
The message
Landlords and tenants who want to stop their rent deals
being disclosed to third parties for use as comparable
evidence in rent arbitrations can benefit from using a
confidentiality clause in their documentation.
The case
In Council of the Borough of South Tyneside v Wickes
Building Supplies (4 November 2004), the claimant landlord
sought the disclosure of an agreement for lease recently
entered into between Allied Dunbar Assurance and B&Q in
relation to premises known as West 5 Centre, in Acton. The
claimant and the defendant tenant considered that the terms
agreed for the Acton letting would serve as an important
comparable in relation to the rent review of council-owned
premises in Alperton, occupied by Wickes. Given that B&Q
and Wickes are competitors in the DIY market, B&Q was
anxious not to disclose the terms of the Acton letting,
particularly as Wickes had been an unsuccessful bidder for
the Acton site.
The claimant had issued witness summonses on both
B&Q and Don Jordison of Threadneedle Asset Management,
the agent of Allied Dunbar, requiring them to produce
documentation relating to the Acton letting. The claimant
argued that this documentation was particularly significant in
relation to the rent review, given the proximity of Acton to
Alperton, and that the planning consents for both premises
were identical and related to businesses in the DIY sector.
60
VALUATION
The message
An arbitrator settling a rent review must decide the rent
payable only on the basis of the submissions made by the
parties. If the arbitrator uses the evidence in a different way,
valuers for both sides must be given a chance to make
representations about it.
The case
In St Georges Investment Company v Gemini Consulting,
the High Court set aside an arbitration award of 1 October
2003 made by Anthony Salata over a rent review of offices
on the lower ground floor, 1 Knightsbridge, London SW1.
The court decided there had been a serious irregularity
that had resulted in substantial injustice to the claimant
landlord and said Salata should reconsider the award.
The arbitrator had determined that the rent payable on
review should be 472,624 a year.
This fell midway between the 646,502 figure of the
landlords valuer and 313,400 from the tenants valuer.
However, the landlord went to the High Court, arguing
that this figure was too low because the arbitrator had
discounted the rent on a different basis to that submitted to
him by either party and that there was no basis for this
discount.
Both valuers had used a rent review of premises on the
third floor of the building, which were also let to the
defendant, as the best comparable.
Their arguments centred on what discount should be
applied to the third-floor rent of 55/sq ft (592.02/sq m) to
61
VALUATION
62
VALUATION
63
NOTICES
Notices
New researchers
Since autumn 2004 the College has recruited three new staff
to its research team. They are pushing forward current and
new projects, including:
Book Review
Real Estate & the New Economy
The impact of information and communications technology
This book, published in February 2005, shows how new
technology affects the shape and form of real estate in our
towns and cities. It examines how Information and
Communications Technology (ICT), as one of a number of
forces for change in commercial and residential property, is
impacting on owners and occupiers and is also leading to
changes in markets and professional services.
Yasmin Pocock BEng MSc, Research Officer, graduated
in Regional and Town Planning in Indonesia in 1995 and
obtained her MSc in Real Estate at the University of Reading
in 1998. She has worked for Jones Lang LaSalle Indonesia/
PT Procon Indah until 2003. As the senior analyst of JLL
Advisory, she performed research and executed consultancy
projects, specialising in the retail sector. At CEM Yasmin is
currently working on the EPSRC SUBR:IM brownfield
research (www.subrim.org.uk).
64
NOTICES
NOTICES
66
Undergraduate courses
The University of Reading
Postgraduate courses
The Web is used to reinforce course teaching through on-line discussion, researched web sites and data resources such as EGi.
In-house training
CPD services
www.cem.ac.uk
Quote ref: CEM2005