Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discipline
D1
D2
Problem description
- Poor description
- No data
D3
Containment action
D4
- No 5 Why analysis
- No Ishikawa analysis
D4
- No 5 Why analysis
- No Ishikawa analysis
D5
- Shallow description
- No efficiency estimation
D5
- Shallow description
- No efficiency estimation
D6
- Copy of D5
- No efficency verification
D6
- Copy of D5
- No efficency verification
D7
D8
Closing 8D
Report
No Good
- Champion not named
- No manager
- Poor presentation
- Poor legibility
OK (minimum
OK (minimum)
Bonus
Score
- Champion named
- Not only Quality Dpt
- Manager in the team
/5
- Pictures
- Measurements
- Test results
/7
- Tracability analysis
- Lot blocking (at supplier, at cust.)
- Fire wall on time
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
/ 10
- Champion sign-off
- Champion Manager sign-off
/5
- Good legibility
- Consequent attachments
/3
Total Score
Percentage
70
/ 100
70.0%
Box
Category
D4
Root Cause D4
(occurrence)
D6
Countermeasure
D6
(occurrence)
D4
Root Cause D4
(non-detection)
D6
Countermeasure
D6
(non-detection)
D6
Countermeasure
confirmation D6
D7
Updates of QM
system
(PQP, FMEA, etc)
D8
Signatures
Other attachments
/ reports
Not good
OK (minimum)
(0) Blank
n/a
Information:
- The 8D report must be a comprehensible description of the root cause finding, understanding and
eliminating.
- It must be convincing to the customer, that all possibilities are analyzed.
(minimum)
Excellent
Score
current
maximal
K. Efective
rmeasure.
es timing, lot no.,
K. Efective method
ned
2.5
ox complete (Yes/No)
1.5
anager sign of
1.5
0.5
20
K. Efective
rmeasure.
es timing, lot no.,
n-relevant or no documents
ed
Total Score
d.
Percentage:
0.0%