Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keywords: Utilization factor (F.U.), MW consumption, Energy demand, programmable logic controller (PLC)
Abstract
This document will detail what were the principal steps that
brought the team through the realization of the project. First, in
order to establish the bases for comprehension purposes, the
invoicing method of Hydro-Quebecs Large Customers will be
explained. Thereafter, differences between the available tools
related to the old and the new measurement will be detailed in
another section. Finally, a description of the results will be
described for each step of the project. It will be ended by the
conclusion section.
Invoicing Method
There are two different invoicing methods for the HydroQubecs Large Customers. Depending on the contract between
them and the customer, the invoicing is generally based on a 15
minutes period or on a 15 minutes sliding window broken into
three 5 minutes intervals. In this last case, for each 5 minutes
period, the average of the consumed power is calculated. Then,
the 15 minutes window is built with the average of these three
values. This is the method used for invoicing at Deschambault.
Introduction
Electrical energy is an important raw material for an aluminum
smelter. Alcoa Aluminerie of Deschambault Qubec (ADQ) is
fed in electricity by a state company called Hydro-Quebec. Two
electric high voltage lines (315 kV) are connected to the plant.
The total consumption of energy is of 3.660 GWh per year, which
represents the equivalent of the consumption of approximately
150,000 houses. It is not difficult to understand the efforts applied
to optimize this precious energy.
Figure 1
Also, the maximum demand (PMAX) contracted with HydroQuebec is the value to which ADQ is committed to consume
during a month. The ratio of the power consumption over this
contractual demand corresponds to a measure of the efficiency of
the energy utilization which will be named the Utilization Factor
U.F.. Better is this ratio, better is our performance as the use of
this allowed energy.
The value that established the amount of the monthly invoice is
determined by the highest of the following values: the contractual
demand (PMAX) or the average power of the highest 15 minutes
333
Figure 2
334
Results
All the changes brought to the control system were described in
the preceding section. The implementation of this set of
modifications obtained excellent results. They are presented
below.
Initially, Graph 1 represents the total electrical power
consumption of the plant BEFORE modifications were applied.
The blue line is expressed in 15 minutes averages on a 6 days
period. The Y axis is in MW. Data is from the end of year 2003.
It should be noticed that the contractual demand (red line) is at
418.8 MW and the consumption average is 417.0 MW. It is
important to note that the average does not take in account the
values lower than 416.8 MW. The reason is that calculation
should take in account only the data in normal operation of the
plant. It will be the same for the other results.
Power
419.0
Power (MW)
418.0
417.0
416.0
PMAX : 418.8 MW
Pmoy : 417 MW
Delta : 1.8 MW
415.0
414.0
24-nov
25-nov
26-nov
27-nov
28-nov
29-nov
30-nov
Time
Graph 1
In 2004, a few weeks after the changes, the results were already
visible. At this stage, only the first two modifications were
applied (Electrical Power Readings, Transmission Mode and
Energy Management vs Invoicing Mode).
On Graph 2, we can observe that the power consumption curve (in
blue) nearly approached the setpoint of the controller (in red).
There was at that time an increase of 1.4 MW of the consumed
power average. This increase went up our Utilization Factor
ratio from 99.50% to 99.85%.
Power
Power (MW)
419.0
418.0
417.0
416.0
PMAX : 418.5 MW
Pmoy : 418.1 MW
Delta : 0.4 MW
415.0
414.0
23-mars
24-mars
25-mars
Time
Graph 2
335
26-mars
27-mars
28-mars
manager in place in 2004 for the confidence that she had put in
our project.
Power (MW)
419.0
Pmax
418.0
417.0
416.0
PMAX : 417.8 MW
Pavg : 417.6 MW
Delta : 0.2 MW
415.0
414.0
01-aot
06-aot
11-aot
16-aot
21-aot
26-aot
31-aot
Time
Graph 3
The rise up of our Utilization Factor from 99.5% to more than
99.9% enabled us to recover 1600 kilowatts of continuous power
which generated an increase in production over than 900 metric
tons of aluminum per year. This represents additional incomes
estimated at 2 500 000$ per year based on the price of aluminum
on the London Metal Exchange in 2008. A total investment of 75
000$ was necessary to achieve the project. A return on
investment of approximately 11 days (0.03 year).
Conclusion
As we mentioned in the introduction, electrical energy is a
precious raw material for aluminum smelters and has a great
impact on their production costs. This is why we invested time to
optimize the availability of electrical energy supplied to the
smelter. At the implementation step of the project, we were
expecting good results and they finally exceeded our expectations.
The objective was subsequent to the analysis of new data
according to modifications our energy supplier made to their
equipments.
In the Results section, looking at the Graph 3, we have shown that
we still have a good performance today. These results improved
our Utilization Factor, improve the accuracy of the controller and
brought a significant increase to our production of aluminum.
Also, through out the realization of this project, we have
demonstrated that the company uses energy in a responsible
manner and this way broadcasts a good corporative citizen image.
These results will not stop our willingness to improve our
efficiency. Still today, we try to increase even more our
Utilization Factor, although each additional kilowatt represents a
real challenge.
Thanks
Thanks to Alcoa Deschambault for having allowed us to
participate in this event. Special thanks to the maintenance
336