Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental and operating benefits of a new fume treatment system at a paste mixing plant
Matthias Hagen 1 , Ralf Forster 2
1
LTB Lufttechnik Bayreuth GmbH & Co. KG, 95497 Goldkronach, Germany;
2
SGL Carbon GmbH, Bonn, Germany
Keywords: Emissions, Fume treatment, VOC, SO2, RTO, oxidizer; benzene, energy
Abstract
Increasing energy prices and high labor costs made a plant
manager think of possibilities to save costs. A green production
plant should be optimized in order to reduce production costs,
increase the output and fulfill newest emission regulations .
The solution was a completely new designed system. Heated
suction hoods at the mixers and a ductwork system with preheating to avoid condensation. The effect was zero cleaning,
which saves time and increases the availability of the whole
plant.
A central fume treatment was installed with a thermal oxidizer
as main part. The resulting energy is used for preheating of the
fumes and the production of heat for the process, which reduces
the energy consumption dramatically.
The paper shows the technical solution and the numbers of
savings in detail.
RTO
TO
Ring Furnace 1
MIXER
Ring Furnace 2
Situation
RTO
TO
KNEADERS
Concept
To reach a lower energy consumption the existing local
oxidizers will be exchanged by one new center plant, equipped
with an external heat recovery. So either a recuperative or a
regenerative oxidizer is required.
Meeting the demanded emission levels for SOx in the clean gas
was a common task for all sources of fumes. So the
desulfurization system has to be designed for the mixture of
both fumes, from the existing regenerative thermal oxidizers
(RTO) of the baking furnaces as well as from the new oxidizer
of the mixing area.
RTO
Ring Furnace 1
MIXER
Ring Furnace 2
RTO
KNEADERS
TO
917
First issue was the mixer and the question how to suck which
air volume from a mixer. Usually the supplier of the mixer has
equipped the mixer with a simple flange to connect the suction
ducting and recommended an air volume, which should be
sucked. At the existing mixer the actual required volume was
determined by reducing the flow with a simple valve. The result
was a reduction from more than 1000 down to 150 Nm/h per
mixer. The connection of the duct with the mixer caused also a
problem. At this point the high velocity of the duct is
transferred into the depth of the mixer. So lots of particles are
sucked out of the mixer into the ducting, where they will stick
to the inside wall.
If it would be possible to reduce the velocity at the connection
point at the mixer, less or even no particles will reach the
ducting. Based on this idea a first mixer suction hood was
designed. To reduce the air velocity a conical hood was chosen,
which has a connecting diameter of 800mm towards the mixer.
Due to mixing temperatures of up to 200C lots of tar
components will be gasified and could condensate later on in
the ductwork system. By heating the hood with thermal fluid
above this temperature, condensation could be avoided in this
part.
of 500C. This enables us as well to use this hot air for a burnout of the ductwork. The amount of hot air was detected by a
test in relation with the required temperature in the fumes. To
ensure no condensation of pitch and tar the temperature is kept
above 230C. After several weeks of operation nearly no
deposits could be found. Up till now the ductwork had not to be
cleaned. The possible burnout (cleaning with hot air) was
tested, but has not been used within the operating time up till
now (approx. 1 year).
The only parts, which needs to be cleaned regularly, are the
valves at each mixer or kneader. The effort is approximately
half an hour per valve and week.
918
type
OXITHERM
Flue gas volume
7.000 Nm/h
Input
200 -350 C
temperature
Burner
1400 kW
VOC, gaseous
3000 mg/m
Residence time
1,5s
Figure 6: design numbers thermal oxidizer
The fumes from the mixers and kneaders are treated directly in
the oxidizer. Low loaded gases from the paste storage area are
preheated with the clean gas of the TO and used as combustion
air for the burner.
3
6
4
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
DeSOx
24.000 Nm/h
180 -240 C
<2000 mg/m
919
Environmental benefits
Internal measurements already during comissioning have
shown, that the required emission levels will be definitely met,
respectively will go below the limits. Official measurements
will be performed soon. As there are no official results
available at the moment, the actual emission levels cannot be
shown today.
Operating benefits
Under attention of the specific requirements for a flue gas
treatment system, LTB has designed and realized an optimum
technical solution in close cooperation with SGL.
For the operator staff the major benefit was less maintenance.
Each maintenance in the past meant a direct contact with tar
and particles, which would be a risk in terms of health and
safety. So reduced maintenance is always a benefit in health of
the staff.
But beyond this an enormous saving in operational costs could
be realized. The old existing oxidizers caused costs for light oil
of about 500.000 Mio /a. For the preparation of thermal fluid
oil, supplying the mixers and kneaders another 100.000 /a
were required.
The new oxidizer reduced this down to 220.000/a plus
30.000/a for the thermal fluid boiler. Reduced air volume,
better efficiency and nearly full use of the energy resulted in
yearly savings of more than 300.000.
Conclusion
References
(1) Fotos from SGL, Bonn 2008
920