Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manufacturer
1. Bashneftechim (Ufa)
2. Lukoil Volgogradneftepererabotka (Volgograd)
3. Lukoil Volgogradneftepererabotka (Volgograd)
4. Lukoil Volgogradneftepererabotka (Volgograd)
5. Lukoil Permnefteorgsintez (Perm)
6. Sibneft, Omsky refinery (Omsk)
7. Angarsk petrochemical company (Angarsk)
8. Novokuibyshevsk NPZ ( Novokuibyshevsk )
Design
capacity on
feed, t/y x 103
300
300
300
600
600
600
600
1500
Year of
commissioning
1955
1963
1966
1982
1970
1971
1971
1986
Manufacturer
Ufa
Volgograd
Perm
Omsk
Angarsk
Novokuibyshevsk
Total Russia
Volume
Processed,
t/y x 103
220
980
1080
607
505
642
4 034
2000
Green Coke,
t/y x 103
Coke yield,
% mass
49.5
243.9
244.4
155.4
112.0
155.6
960.8
22.5
24.9
22.6
25.6
24.1
24.2
23.8
927
Volume
Processed,
t/y x 103
435.0
943.8
842.4
575.3
530.8
519.6
3846.9
2005
Green Coke,
t/y x 103
Coke yield, %
mass
194.4
252.3
221.6
168.6
145.8
166.1
1108.8
35.5
26.7
26.3
28.8
27.5
32.0
28.8
25
Reactivity in CO2, %
20
15
10
Omsk
Volgograd
Ja
nF e 07
b0
M 7
ar
-0
Ap 7
rM 07
ay
-0
Ju 7
n0
Ju 7
lA u 07
gS e 07
p0
O 7
ct
N 07
ov
D 07
ec
-0
Ja 7
n0
Fe 8
b0
M 8
ar
-0
Ap 8
rM 08
ay
-0
Ju 8
n0
Ju 8
lA u 08
g08
0,12
Novo-Kuibyshevsk,
Ufa
Vanadium , %
0,10
Volgograd,
Omsk,
Angarsk
0,08
0,06
Manufacturer
Perm
0,00
1
3
Sulphur, %
Mercury
porosity, cm3/g
Bulk density
g/cm3
2.031
0.102
0.865
2.031
2.029
2.030
0.113
0.115
/
0.858
0.859
0.860
NovoKuibyshevsk
Omsk,
Volgograd
Perm
0,04
0,02
Real density,
g/cm3
0,95
0,93
0,91
0,89
0,87
0,85
0,83
0,81
0,79
0,77
0,75
Novo-Kuibyshevsk
Omsk/Volgograd
Pavlodar
More Isotropic
More Anisotropic
7
10
11
12
GPC Volatiles, %
Figure 4 shows the changes in supplies over the last five years to
RUSALs smelters of green petroleum coke according to
classification into the three relative groups.
Volatiles, %
8
8
8
8.5
8
9.8
S, %
1.4
1.6
1.5
3.0
4.4
4.0
Ash, %
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.28
0.38
928
Fe, %
0.015
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.022
0.045
Si, %
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.026
0.034
V, %
0.015
0.020
0.015
0.040
0.087
0.070
Na, %
0.006
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.012
0.013
is then supplied with coke from only one group. Moreover, the
calcination process parameters (throughput and calcination
temperature) are established for different combinations of green
coke based on green coke properties.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
57,3%
53,6%
45,4%
43,5%
51,4%
70,3%
50%
40%
29,8%
24,7%
30%
20%
10%
26,2%
40,0%
34,5%
Source
Angarsk
China
Volgograd
Pavlodar
Perm
Ufa
Brazil
Omsk
Turkmenistan
13,1%
16,6%
18,0%
20,2%
24,7%
2003
2004
2005
2006
16,5%
14,0%
2007
2008
0%
(S4%, V0,07%)
(S2,7%, V0,035%)
(S<1,8%, V<0,025%)
2003
32,5
45,6
0,0
0,7
12,1
6,5
0,0
0,0
2,5
2004
32,5
37,4
1,3
14,5
3,8
4,1
0,0
4,5
1,8
2005
30,8
35,9
0,0
8,2
0,0
19,6
0,0
0,0
5,5
2006
37,1
18,7
6,4
3,9
9,8
24,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2007
35,9
12,2
9,4
27,3
15,3
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2008
40,9
15,1
8,2
20,2
13,0
0,0
2,5
0,0
0,0
The cokes with elevated volatile content (among them are the
cokes supplied from China and Brazil) are calcined at higher
temperature up to 123050 0. The sulfur content is constantly
evaluated in the total blend after calcination to monitor the
effectiveness of the blending process. If the sulfur content differs
considerably from the weighted average calculated from the sulfur
level and proportion in the blend of each green coke this is
indicative blending process problems and adjustments to the
process are made.
Manufacturer
Omsk
Novokuibyshevsk
Volgograd
Pavlodar
Perm
China
Brazil
Turkmenistan
Ufa
Ukraine
Azerbaijan
2003
16,1
27,7
15,6
11,4
1,9
7,4
0,0
19,9
0,0
0,0
0,0
2004
12,1
33,0
18,9
0,0
32,0
0,0
0,0
3,1
0,9
0,0
0,0
2005
15,3
20,9
11,1
7,7
37,7
0,0
0,0
7,3
0,0
0,0
0,0
929
3,00
0,050
0,045
2,50
0,96
0,50
0,94
2,29
2,23
2,25
2,00
2,15
1,00
1,50
0,030
0,025
0,020
vanadium %
0,035
1,50
0,96
sulfur, %
0,040
2,00
0,015
0,00
0,010
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
content S
content V
88,0
86,0
84,0
mm
82,0
80,0
78,0
76,0
74,0
72,0
control group
Conclusion
The world tendency of deterioration in coke quality manifesting
as elevated percentages of sulfur and vanadium introduces
additional considerations in blending and their use in larger
smelters. In some cases, the main difficulties are due to lack of
production area or facilities for the blending of the coke with good
quality with the cokes of lesser quality for the production of good
anode quality. The main challenge under existing production
conditions is to produce carbon products (anode paste, anode
blocks) with optimum characteristics to provide for required
electrolysis parameters.
RUSAL is continuing to carry out work and experimental
programs aimed at evaluating the feasibility of using high-sulfur
cokes (S>4%) for the anode paste and prebake anodes. During the
process, additional experience will be gained on the performance
of very high sulphur and high vanadium cokes.
930
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to Barry Sadler for the
possibility to use results of his studies and John A. Johnson for
critical remarks.
References
1.
2.
931