Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EKRON
[BFLI :
2 K. 247
aly. [BAL]; Is.
TOT.
&rb
x.
(h.
2
"42
A O F l 3 6 337; GI1174, n.
2.
I249
(Ih?!;
('$l?v?)
EKRON
ELAH, VALLEY OF
I.
ELADAH, RV ELEADAH
(?l$\F 35 ; AAAAA [B],
EAEAAA [A], -A [L]), a clan-name in a genealogy of
ELAH (ilh,
and
K. 418 K h , an abbreviation of
4s
ELATH
ELAM
is due to Conder (PEFQ,'75, 193). Some of his
other identifications are hardly correct (see EPHESDAMMIM, SHAARAIM, I ) ; but he has here thrown great
light on the narrative. See also GASm. H G 2 2 6 8
One advantage in Miller's theory of the valley of Elah (see
above) is that it offers a simple explanation of the twofold name
of the valley which was the seat of war. A very fine specimen
of the bufm-tree (terebinth) grows on the slope leading up to
Bet Nettif. It is conceivable that the name of the great valley
as a whole was, even in antiquity, 'valley ot the acacias ' (sanf=
acacia, or rather mimosa). Wellhausen supposes the WBdy esSa$ to be meant by the Valley of Shittim in Joel 3[4]18. It is
a pity that we can hardly explain p'n, in pni DDN as a corruptionof p c ) w . See EPHES-DAMMIM.
T. K. C.
~IALM
ELAM (Db&';
[BKADQL]). Geographically,
the name describes the meat Dlain E. of the lower
Tigris agd N.Aof the Persian Gulf,
Geography*topether with the mountain districts
which enclose it on the N. and E., and to which the
Hebrew name Elam and the Assyrian Elamtul (note
fem. ending) refer. It is nearly equivalent to the Susiana
and Elymais of the Greeks, and the mod. KhBzistHn.
SHUSHAN.
T. K. C.
The native kings of this country called themselves lords
of AnSan'(or Anzan) ; so late a king as Cyrus still calls
ELAM (&V, HAAM [B11Iv AIA. PI).
This name was originally
himself king of AnSan.
I. T h e h'ne Elam were a family, 1254 in number in the great
post-exilic list (see E ZRA ii., $I 9, $ Bc), Ezra 2;(pahap [Bl,
borne by a city, the conquest of which by Gudea, ' vicea d . [AL])=Neh. 7 1 2 (.ha* [K], a A [BAL])=r Esd. 5172
gerent ' (patesi) of Lagas, between 3 500 and 3000 B. c.,
(rohapog [B]). In a passage from the 'memoirs of Ezra' (Ezra
is recorded in an inscription (KB339) ; it afterwards
727-834; see E ZRA ii 5 5 ) the number of those in Ezra's
caravan (see E ZRA i. { ' z . ii s 15 [I] c i ) is given as seventy,
designated a district in Elam (see CYKUS, I). LeavEzra 8 7 (qha [B])=I 'Esd.)83; (aap [SI, rh. [AI). One of the
ing the geography of this region, which has been fully
best known members of this clan was SHECANIAH (q.u., 4),
treated from cuneiform sources by Fried. Delitzsch (Par.
p102 (@sly ktb but &.y, kre.; cupaqh [Ll in I1 I Esd.
892
320-3zg), we pass to the references to Elam in the Or.
Israel' rupaqi [BXL] occurs instead of 'Elam'). Various
The earliest of these is that in Is. 2 2 6 ( ~ h a ~ [ e ] r . r a i members are mentioned in the list of those with foreign wives
(see E ZRA i., 5 , end), Ezra1026=1 Esd. 927 (qha [BA]); and
rBAKO1). where Elam and Kir are mentioned together
the clan was represented among the signatories to the covenant
2. Biblical as entrusted with the duty of blockading
(see E ZRA i., $ 7 ) , Neh.2014[15].
The name ' Elam ' for a Jewish family or temple-guild
references. p u s a l e m . The difficulty in this passage
is that the Elamites were never loyal
is highly improbable. There is abundant evidence that
subjects of the Assyrians, and are never mentioned in
names containing the root-letters &y were Benjaniite.
the inscriptions as serving in an Assyrian army, but
One of these is n&y (Alemeth) which may have been
often as allies of the Babylonians. (Del., Par. 1 3 7 ;
If the mark of abbreviation were overwritten '&y.
Inter:
Che. Zntr. Zs. 133 ; cp Proph. Is. 113zf.).
looked it would be natural to insert * or 1 after y.
polation has been suspected ; but this is not the only
Alemeth is identical with Almon, the name of a priestly
admissible theory (see ' Isaiah,' SBOT). T h e next
city in Benjamin (Josh. 21 18 P). Notice also the
certainly dated passage is Ezek. 3 2 2 4 (chap [Q]), where
occurrence of the name in 3 below.
' Elam and all her multitude ' are mentioned m a grand
2. The children of the 'other Elam' (YnN p$yj in Ezra 2 31
=Neh. 7 34 (Ezra, qhapap [BA], Neh. qhapaap [BAI ; [UCOLI
description of the inhabitants of ShB61. The fate of
arhap I.ripou [L]) are unmentioned in 11 I Esd. 5, and seem to
Elam preoccupied more than one of the prophets ; ' all
have arisen from a needless repetition of v. 7 ; the numbers are
the kings of Elam' are referred to in Jer. 252, (om.
identical (cp Be..Ry. 18).
3. b. Shashak, in a genealogy of B EN J AMIN (g.v., 5 9, ii.) :
K*A") immediately before 'all the kings of Media,'
I Ch. 8 24 (achap [Bl aqh. [AI, qh. [Ll).
and a special prophecy against Elam is given in Jer.
4. A Korahite doorkeeper. I Ch. 163 (rohap) [BAI).
4934-39 (a. 36 chap [K"]); but we cannot with any
5. A priest in the proceskon a t the dedication of the wall
certainty ascribe these to Jeremiah (see J EREMIAH ,
(see E ZRA ii. 5 13g), Neh. 1242 (om. BN*A, aihap [Nc.a ?"&I).
BOOK OF).
In Is. 212 (~Xap[e]i.rai [BAKQ], late
T. K. C.
exilic) Elam is named with Media as the destroyer
ELASA
(
~
A
A
C
A
[A]),
I
Macc.
9
5
RV.
see
BEREA,I.
of Babylon, and a plausible emendation introduces
Elam ( ' go up, 0 Elam ') into a passage of similar
ELASAH (@&,
'God hath made,' 5 31 ; cp
purport in Jer. 5021 (late). In Dan. 82 (arhap [BAQG
Asahel ; EAEACA [ALQI).
Theod.], eXupaiGr [87]) Shushan is referred to as in
I. b. PASHUR
(g.v., 3) in list of those with foreign wives (see
Elam, though in Ezra 4 9 (qhaparor [BA], arhaprmi
E ZRA i., 5 j, end) Ezra l O z z ( q h a u a ) = ~Esd. 9 22 (TALSAS,R V
[L]) it is seemingly distinguished from it ; and according
SALOAS
; uahOas iB1, - h a s IAI):
2. b. Shaphan togetherwith GEMARTAH
(I), wassent by Zedeto Is. 1 1 1 1 (arhap[e]r.rwv [BA], ehap. [ K Q ] , late),
kiah to NebuchAdrezzar, king of Babylon and bore also at the
Esth. 9613 (Shushan) Acts 2 9 (ehapei.rai [Ti. WH]),
same time Jeremiah's letter to those in exile there; Jer. 293
Jewish exiles resided in Elam in the post-exilic period.
[@ 36 31 (ehsauav [B*b], -cap [Bamg. *I, -map [AI).
We come lastly to Gen. 1022 [PI (aiXaG [E]), where
3. E V ELEASAH,
b. Helez, a Jerahmeehte, I Ch. 2 3 9 5
(was [BI).
Elam is mentioned immediately before Asshnr as a
4. E V ELEASAH, a descendant of Saul mentioned in a gene'son' of Shem. How is this to be accounted for?
alogy of B EN J AMIN ($ 9, ii. 8); I Ch. 837 (euqh [B])=943
Not by the supposition that the Elamites were Semitic
(euaqh [B], w q h [A]). Cp LAISHAH.
(as we now use the word) either in language or in
physical type, or that at least a primitive Semitic popnELATH
cp nS*K in the Sinaitic Inscr. [Eut.
lation was settled in the lower parts of Elam. Not
5511; A I A A ~[BAL]; Dt. 28 A I ~ [BAFL];
N
2 K.
by referring to the early conquest of Babylonia by the
1 4 2 2 - w [B],
[A]; 166 NAAM [A]), also EI.OTII
Elamites; this might account for the description of
I K. 926 2 K. 1 6 6 AIAAM
[A]; 2 Ch. 8 1 7
Babylonia as a ' son of' Japheth, but not for the case
262, AIAAM [B]). an important Edomite town, whose
before us : nor yet by the fact that a Kassite dyncsty
connection with Elah the phylarch or clan in Gen.
3 6 4 r is fairly obvious. Elath or Eloth @.e., great
1 Jensen connects Ehrntu (Elam) with illanru, 'front,' and
trees, perhaps date-palms?) is probably but a later
explains ' east region ' ( Z A, '96, p. 3jr).
0
~~
~~~
-2,.
(&re,
(nh,
1253
1254
EL-BERITH
ELEAZAR
EL-BERITH (n3I
$s),Judg. 9 4 6 RV.
See BAAL-
BERITH.
E L c I A ( e h ~ e l [BSA]),
a
Judith 8 1 AV, RV ELKIAH.
ELDAAH (??>IF God calls? cp the Sab. form
h y i . , ZDMG 27648 37399), a son of MIDIAN (Gen.
2 5 4 : I Ch. 133).
@s readings are : in Gen., Bepyapa [AI, Le., Togarmah :
( r l h n a d a ) IBI, pnapa IDh rescr.1, p y a [Ll, ap. [E*], cap.
[EaLl ; and in Ch. ehhasa [B], ehsaa [AL].
ELDAD
w),
1255
1256
ELEAZAR
ELEMENTS
things necessary for the sanctuaxy and its service is detailed in Nu. 416. Shortly before Aaron's death he
was invested on Mt. Hor with his father's garments of
authority (Nu. 2 0 2 5 3 ; cp Dt. 106 [D]). H e now
appears as Moses' coadjutor, taking the place of Aaron ;
together they took the census of the people (Nu. 2663),
and divided the spoil of the Midianites (Nu. 31 123). It
was to them that the daughters of Zelophehad came
to sue for an inheritance ( N u . 2 7 1 8 ) , and the b'ne
Reuben and b'ne Gad for a pasture-land for their
flocks (Nu. 3223).' The charge was given to Joshua
in the presence of Eleazar, who was ' to inquire for him
by the judgment of Urim before Yahwe ' (Nu. 2 7 1 8 8 ) ;
just as his son Phinehas is said to have done, previous
to the assault on Gibeah (Judg. 2 0 ~ 8 ) . ~Henceforth in
the accounts of the dividing of the land etc. Eleazar
is mentioned before Joshua (Nu. 3228 3417 Josh. 141
1 7 4 1951 2 l 1 ) . ~ At his death be was buried at Gibeah
of Phinehas (Josh. 2433 [E]), which had been given to
his son in Mt. Ephraim. H e married 'one of the
daughters of Putiel ' (Ex. 6 2 5 ) . and the priesthood is said
to have remained in his family till the time of Eli, and
again from Zadok till the time of the Maccahees-statements which need a strictly critical examination. See
ZADOK, I.
s. A. c.
2. Son of Abinadab, temp. Samuel.
According to
a comparatively late story the ark was deposited for
twenty years in the house of Abinadab at Kirjath-jearim
under the guardianship of his son Eleazar (I S . 7 I$ ).
Eleazar in this ' idealisation ' of history is intended as
a contrast to that other son of Abinadab (Uzza) who
proved wanting in the reverence essential to a minister
of the ark (2S. 63 6). His name is probably meant
to suggest this contrast. Observe that Eleazar was
specially sanctified ' for his functions. See A RK , J 5.
his brother Judas appointed him to read aloud the sacred hook,
T. K. C.
(aB,
1066 (the words after ' Moserah') is plainlya late and unauthorised gloss ; he refers to u. 8, where the institution of the Levitical
priesthood is assigned to a later stage of the wanderings. I t is
of E LIEZER that the older tradition speaks, as a son, however,
not of Aaron, hut (together with Gershom) of Moses. In fact,
in JE Moses has the prior claim to the priestly office, and in J
Aaroi originally is not mentioned a t all. In the genealogies of
P even one main branch of the tribe of Levi is still called
Gersho6, and another important member is called Mnshi-ie.,
the Mosalte(see We. ProL(4) 138f E T 142J).
1 321-17 is of composite origin:' How much belongs to P
(more precisely P2) is disputed ; but the mention of Eleazar the
priest' beyond question comes from this source (see Dr., Zntr.
64. Holzinger Einl.., 'Tabellen,' IO).
i Judg. 20 i; its present form is post-exilic, and vv. 276, 28a
are no doubt glosses (see Moore, Judges, 434 ; Kue. Einl. $ 20,
n. IO).
3 All in P ; in J E on the contrary Joshua isalways represented
a s acting alone; cp 146 1714 etc.
4 eB [BUV] auapav, Jos. (Ant. xii. 61) aupav, apavand aaapav;
Syr. ],in.
I n 6 4 3 48 gives uaupav which is probably a mistake
I257
and with a variation of his own name as watchword (' the HelD
of God ') he led the first hand of the army against Nicanor ana
completely defeated him ; in z Macc. 1315 this is credited to
Judas himself. I n the fight near Beth-Zacharias against Antiochiis Eupator (163 B.c.) Eleazar nobly sacrificed his life (see
I Macc. 643).
IO. A learned scribe, who a t the age of ninety years suffered
torture and martyrdom a t the hands of Antiochus Epiphanes,
z Macc. 618-21 (ehaafoooc IVAl). H e was desiznated bv the
early Christ&n'fath&s
protd:martyr of the old covekant,'
' foundation of martyrdom ' (Chrys. Horn. 3 in Macc. e t al.).
T h e narrative in 3 Macc. G has apparently borrowed the name
Eleazar from this scribe. See APOCALYPTIC, # 66.
11. Father of J ASON (q.v., 3), I Macc.817.
12. Sirach Eleazar, father of Jesus (Ecclus. 5027):
., , see
E CCLESIASTICUS , $ z.
13. b. Eliud, placed three generations above Joseph (Mt. 115).
S. A. C., I, 3 3 ; T. K. C., 2.
ELEAZURUS, RV ELIA~IFJUS
(EAIACIBOC
[A]),
($e?!!
EL ELYON
5 118.
(fi')g
$e),Gen. 1418.
See N AMES ,
UTOLXOS,
1258
ELEMENTS
ELEMENT8
tradition has it) before Plato ; but from his time onward
it became a current meaning. The early philosophers
assumed sometimes one, sometimes more than one,
primary constituent element of the universe. Empedocles reckoned four-fire, water, earth, and air.
Many citations from non-biblical writers will be found
in the Lexicons ; and Philo and Josephus also use the
word in this sense. In the Greek Bible the following
examples occur :-Wisd. 7 17, For he himself gave me
an unerring knowledge of the things that are ; to know
the constitution of the world and the operation of the
elements (udurauiv K ~ U ~ OKai
U
6vdpyetav urorxefwv) ;
19rS, the elements changing their order one with
another (81 gaur& ybp r b uroixeia ,ueOapporbpeva) ;
4 Macc. 1213 [the tongues of men] of like passions
with yourself, and composed of the same elements
( r o d s QotorraOeis ~ a t~
l r3v a h & yeyovbras uroixehv ;
cp z Macc. 7.2, the first elements [ U ~ O L X E ~ W U of
~~]
each one of you) ; and, according to most exegetes,
2 Pet. 310, the day of the Lord will conie as a
thief ; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a
great noise (urorxeia
Kauuolipeva XUB+SFT~L [.4KL.
etc., AuOfjaovrar]), and the earth and the ,works that
are therein shall be burned up : also v. 12, the day
of God by reason of which the heavens being on fire
shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with
fervent heat (81 ;4 obpavoi aupo6,uevor XuEfiuovrar
~ a luroixeia Kauuovpwa n$Kerai). The rendering
elements here gives an excellent sense, and it would
be mere pedantry to ask why the elements are named
along with the heavens and the earth ; the writers
purpose is to depict the last day in the boldest colonrs,
and he seeks to heighten the effect of his picture by
bringing in the .sroLxeia. At the same time the interpretation which takes the word here to refer to demonic
life-spirits (see below, z ) is entitled to attention. Though
the sense of rudiments or beginnings, alluded to
above, is hardly to be traced to this last concrete
application of the word, the very usual metonymic sense
of fundamental condition, thesis, principle, rule
-of which there is no example in the Bible-is doubtless to be taken from this meaning. On the other hand,
the biblical passages receive much light from another
part of the history of the word : the concrete sense in
which in late Greek the word uroixeia is specialised to
mean the planets (as being the elements and so to
say supports of the heavens) and, more widely,
the stars.2
Now every element has its god ; so also every star.
In the Orphic Hymns the personified ether is called the
noblest element, uroixeiov tlpiurov (54), Hephzestus
is called the perfect element, CrrorXEiov &pep+& (654),
in the great Paris magic-papyrus v. 1303 the moongoddess is the immortal element, morxeiov tl+Oaprov,
and in the so-called nymph of the world, the K6p7
K ~ U ~ O of
U
Hernies Trismegistus (ap. Stob. E c l i.
3851zfi)),the uroixeia come as gods before the supreme
God, and make their complaint of the arrogance of
Conceptions such as these perhaps owe their
origin to eastern influences ; but at any rate they have
their analogues in the Jewish idea that all things-as, for
example, fire, wind, clouds, stars-have their proper
angels or spirit^,^ a thought which is operative in
primitive Christian literature also ; see Rev. 7 I (four
angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding
the four winds of the earth), 141s (another angel
.
which hath power over fire), 16 5 (the angel of the waters ;
1 Dieterich, 61. The present writer regards as much less
probable the conjecture (see Papes W8rter6nch)that the planets
are so called as having a controlling influence upon the affairs
of men.
2 It is further applied to the signs of the zodiac, and even to
the entire heaven with its system of stars ; t h e metonymic signification great stars= great men, also occurs.
3 DiLterich, 57, 61.
4 All the above examples are taken from Dieterich, 6
0s
5 Spitta, Der zweite B&f des P e t w s und der Grief des
Judas, 1885, p\ 2 6 5 8 ; Everling, 7 0 8
..
12.59
. .
rpiov
708
U T O ~ X ~ L W Vrou K O U ~ O K P ~ T O P O T
B m p a ip;v
Zv o;pav&
e b i v .
..
Kat
is
...
...
r&
Oeal ~ahoJpcOa
UK~TOUP
Kal
...
..
uroixeia ot K O U ~ O K ~ ~ T O ~700
E S U K ~ T O U S TO~TOU
Bne&
K J ~ L O bS &bs EGod UOL .;lv Ztovuiau Zlrt lravrbr a v s l i p a r o p
drpiou re K a ; Zn~yslou a a i xaraXBoviov, &d r&o K a i +p&
lraprur~psOaZ v J m 6 v uou i s r i horri aveJpara). The first
calls himself the first decan of the zodiac circle (npiuros
Gcravbr 705 <@L~KoB KJKAOU ; Fleck, 129f.).
Plainly stoicheion
..
..
...
is merely an
ELEMENTS
amplification for under
ELEPHANT
the world ( h r b
7 b V KbUpOV).
..
...
dOpd7WV
?rVupdTUV T?JKO,U&VUV).
,208:
1261
iNB.
C.
L 1
T h e two species, EZejhas indicus (maximus) and E. a f n canus, together with such fossil forms as the Mammoth (name
probably from Behemoth),l the Mastodon, and others, constitute the Mammalian order Proboscidea. T h e Indian elephant
is now found in a state of nature, in India Burmah the Malay
Peninsula, Akam, Cochin China, Ceylon, aAd Sumatia, frequenting the wooded districts ; its African congener lives throughout
Africa south of the Sahara desert, but is retreating before the
approach of civilised man. I n Pleistocene times it spread as far
north as Europe.
The Indian species has been domesticated since prehistoric times and is still largely used in the service
of man. The male alone as a rule has tusks. The
African elephant is, in the male, larger than the Indian,
the ear-flaps and the eyes are larger and the forehead
more convex, there are two finger-like processes on the
trunk instead of one, and the pattern on the teeth is
different ; both sexes have tusks. In temper this species
is usually fiercer and the animal is undoubtedly more
powerful and active than its Indian relative.
It is certain that elephants were known to the old
inhabitants of Egypt and Assyria, by whom they were
sometimes hunted for the sake of their ivory and their
hides (KB 139, Tiglath-pileser I. ; As. u. Eur. 263,
Thotnies 111. ; Houghton, TSBA 8 7 2 3 3 ) . There is an
elephant among theanimals figured on the Black Obeliska
of Shalmaneser 11. (858-824).
Of course there may
have been more than one elephant in the tribute from
the land of Mugri ; but one was enough for the purpose
of representation.
Elephants in warfare first appear among the Persians.
Darius at Arbela (331 B .c.) employed 15 of them.
2. Use in They were often used by the Seleucids,
warfare frequent mention of them being made in
the Maccabean wars (cp I Macc. 3 3 4 6 3 0
8 6 1156 2 Macc. 1 1 4 1 3 7 5 etc.). These elephants,
1 The 6 may have hecome 771 through Slavonic influence.
2 The term used for elephantin S h a h Obel. Epigr. 111;
is baziafi. The word aZ-ajalso occurs but in the sense of ox
not elephant (Wi. KB 1151). Houkhton suggests the wild
buffalo. Cp IVORY.
1262
ELEUTHEROPOLIS
ELHANAN
For some centuries the Grzco-Roman name supplanted the older designation ; but when, 1 5 0 years after
the Saracenic conquest, the city was destroyed, the latter
revived (Reland, Pal. 222, 227 ; Gesfa Deiper Francos,
1044).
1263
6r
T. K. c.
ELEUTHERUS (eheyespoc [AKV]), a river of
Syria (I Macc. 117), the mod. Nahr aCKebir.
See
PHOENICIA.
ELHANAN (I?&& ' El is gracious.' 28 ; cp Baal-
hanan and
Palm.
j l l T h , IllY+v2;
EACANAN
par.
( I ) The slayer of Gohath ;
NE@AN]).
one of David's warriors (ben-Jair). The M T of z S.
2119 reads (RV), 'And there was again war with the
Philistines at G o b ; and Elhanan the son of Jair the
Bethlehemite slew Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose
spear was like a weaver's beam.' The document to
which the passage belongs ( 2 S. 2 1 1 5 - 2 2 , and 238-39)
is an extract from an ancient Israelite ' roll of honour,'
and deserves more credit than the later story which
ascribes the slaying of Goliath to the youthful David.
&AN
1264
ELI
ELIAB
ELI
?&,
(hg,
'high,'
49 ; cp Palm.
thy,
and Nab.
2s
W. R. S.-T.
K. C .
Jve
eAwi: Treg. prefers ~ A L ;in Mt., rho1 in Mk.; Ti. and Zahn
prefer q A a in Mt., sAor in Mk. For the verb all agree in adopting uaSax0avei (Zahn - V L . an unimportant variation).
Epiphanius (Haw. 6 9 6 8 ) remarks on Mt. 2746 that
ELIAB
(IY'iF,
3 25 ;
CP 5cPt?y; e h [ ~ ] i b B
[BANI,]).
I. b. Helon, prince of Zebulun (Nu. 1 9 2 7 72429
1 0 16).
2. b. PALLU( p . v . ) , father of Nemuel, Dathan, and
Abiram (Nu. 1 6 I 12 2 6 8 Dt. 116).
3. Son of Jesse and brother of David. According to
I S. 1 6 6 I Ch. 213 he was'the eldest son of Jesse (:p
1713 28). In I Ch. 2718 mention is made of a certain
ELIHU( p . v . , 2 ) as one of the brethren of David (this
name is inserted by Pesh. in I Ch. 2 13 and occupies the
seventh place, David being eighth). Elihu, however, is
1 I n Mt. 8.6 pow Bed pow, h a d [2va T;, W H ] ps &fra'r6Aiaer
[Ti. W H ] ; in Mk. 6 Beos pow b BE& p o v , ELF ~i ;yxaT6Ahrrri p e
[Ti. WH].
2 Syriac (Pesh., Sin Hcl.) in Mt. gives the words of the
exclamation alone, but'!" Mk. adds a translation as in the Gk.
3 The transliteration of 3 by
before 0 is analogous to that
0f.p by y, In uapa,yOaveL. See Dalm. Gmnz. 304.
1265
1266
ELIADA
ELIEL
*eturns' (or ' turns ') ; cp Is. 528, and prop. name
AS HUB, old Aram. 2nlDK, 'Assur returns,' CZS 3,
[IO. 36, and Sab. ? K i l n , Hal. 485; sAiacoyB [L],
E A [ E I I ~ C E I B[AKBI).
I . A descendant of Zerubbabel : I Ch. 324
. (. a u .4 rB1.
--.
IN]).
ELIADA
See M ADIABUN .
6
RV E LIJAH, 3.
ELIAH (?I$%).
I . Ezra 1 0 ~ AV,
2. I Ch.
ELIAHBA (K??!)&
~hrau.[L]).
ELIASIS (~Aiacsic[BA]),
JAASAIJ.
ELIATHAH (3&$,
in I Ch. 2527 3$$
cp, however, HEMAN; Hhiea [L]).
; 35 ;
ELIDAD (T$?V, J 2 8 ; ~ A A A A [BAFL]), a Benjnmite prince, Nu. 3421,f P). The name seems
traditional (cp ELDAD)
; its meaning is disputed.
Some connect it, like B ILDAD and BEDAD,with the
divine name Dad ( = Ramman) ; thus it would mean
' Dad is (the clan's) god' : the name Dad-ilu is borne
by a king bf the land of Kaska (Schr. COT1244f: ;
Del. Pay. 298). However, Elidad may also mean ' God
has loved I ; cp Sab. ~ R T T D.
~ , H. Muller, ZDMG, 1883,
p. 15 ; and see N AMES , J 28. Incidentally this avoids
the apparent incongruity of giving a heathen name to
an Israelite ; but heathen names such as Elidad, Hur,
Ash-hur, Ash-bel(?), may have been borne by men
who knew nothing of the heathen gods whose names
entered into their own, or who at any rate did not
worship them (cp M ORDECAI , I ). Gray's explanation
(Hi",61) ' a kinsman (uncle) is God' seems less
probable ; see DOD[N AMES WITH].
T. K . C.
'JWh ;
5vz
(hh,
ELIEL
E A [ E ] L ~[BAL]);
A
a man's name
somewhat frequent in Chronicles, but not found elsewhere in the OT. It means ' My God is El,' 38 ; or,
ELIAONIAS ( ~ A I ~ U N I A[A]),
C
I Esd. 831=Ezra
perhaps, ' E l is God.' In I Ch. 634[19] Eliel is sub8 4 3 E LIEHOENAI, 2.
stituted for Elihu ( =' H e [Yahw&] IS God '). Both
ELIAS ( H A E I M ) , Mt. 1 1 1 4 AV, RV ELIJAH( p . ~ . ) . names are virtually identical with Elijah ( ' Yahwk is
God,' or, 'my God').
Compare the royal name
ELIASAPH (qB)y, ' God increases ' [;.e., the Iluma-ilu, ' Ilu is god,' where the second ilu takes
family'l, I 27. 44 ; aA[~]icp@
[BAFL]).
the place of this king's special deity (KB 384, Hommel,
2 14 (-+[ad [Ll),
AHT 1.93).
1267
1268
2.
ELIASHIB
(2'!$!?4,
ELIENAI
ELIJAH
ELIHOENAI
HOENAI
(+>*u\il;$$),Ezra 8 4
AV, RV ELIE-
(2).
(l$?a
ELIHOREPH
; eAia@ [Bl. ~ N A ~ E [AI,
@
eAi&B [L] ; true name perhaps Elihaph [cp @I, L e . ,
God is Haph [=Apis, see ApIs1, of which Elihoreph
may be an alteration on religious grounds; cp Ahishahar, from Ahi-hur? so Marquart), one of Solomons
scribes, son of Shisha ( I K. 43). The text of
vv. 1-20, however, is in much disorder, and v. 3 needs
emendation. Y; z promises a list of princes. The
first prince (v.z) is Azariah, son of the priest Zadok.
The next should be Elihoreph (Elihaph?)and Ahijah
sons of Shavsha the secretary (Klost. ). See SHAVSHA.
T. K. C.
1269
+LOU
>
=.
1270
ELIJAH
ELIJAH
distance of something like 16 m. but, true to his Bedouin instincts, refrains from entering the
soeh:
&.
1272
ELIJAH
ELIPHAL
42
I273
[A], ABEIMEAEX
ELIOENAI (+Jrp\+\pand$&'Q,
J 34, &e., towards
God are mine eyes,' or [We.] Elioeni [Eliaueni], ' God
brought me forth' [from Aram. k W ~ = R ~ but
~],
analogy suggests that the word is corrupt. The true
name may be pi$a
(Che.)--.p coming from w , and
91 from n (cp JUSHAB-HESED)
; ~ A I U H N A I [A]. -UNAI
[LI).
I.
.Y
[El, v. 24 Ehrwvvar
[Ai!! A
ELIONAS ,(EAIGJNAC
I. I
I
2.
ELIPHAL
...,
(q
[AI).
(5p95.;:
. K), I Ch. 1135 ; ilVmg. ELIPHELET
2).
1274
ELIPHALAT
ELISHA
),:
I Ch. 14 7 c p + a h s ~
[B], 6". [N], ahi+ahaT [L] ; I Ch. 36 rher+o.h@
[B], &+a0 [Ll : I Ch. 14 5 ehsr+ahd [B]. See DAVID, $ T I ( d ) .
2. One of David's ' thirty' ( 2 S. 2 3 3 4 ; in I Ch. 1135
(@)a
1275
r276
ELISHA
ELISHAH
ELISRAR (?I@)#
; eA[e]ica [BADEL], in bLof
Gen. 104, ~Aicca),a son of Javan, occurs elsewhere
only in the combination 'K
Ezek. 277, ' coast-lands
of Elishah' ( N H C W N eA[s]lcal [BAQ]), whence violet
and purple stuffs were brought to Tyre. The two most
plausible identifications are that with S. Italy and
Sicily, where were Greek colonies (Kiepert, Lag., Di.,
Kau. ; cp T IRAS, end), and that with Carthage or,
more widely, the N. African coast (Schulthess, Stade,
E. Meyer [ G A , 12821). Both regions were famous for
the purple dye (cp P URPLE ). The latter is favoured by
the name ; Elissa, princess of Tyre, was the legendary
founder of Carthage, which was perhaps originally called
Elissa. On the other side Dillmann quotes the gloss in
Syncellus, ' Elissa, whence the Sicelots ' (Qhraah 65 09
U L K ~ X ;O ~Eus. Chron. Amzen. 2 13) ; but this seems
to tell against the identification of Elishah and Sicily.
1277
1278
'!e,
ELISHAMA
ELKOSHITE
(V?$h@,
ELISHAMA
A[E]lCAMA [BAL]).
5 32 ;
f 48 53 10 zz), I Ch.
2. Son of David
(@ha,
5 29 ; cp
ELISHAPHAT
God [or, my God] hath
4 . One of Davids warriors, I Ch. 12 6 ( ? k a v a [BAL]). See
DAVID,
$ I T (a).
judged, 3 5 ; cp Jehoshaphat and Ph. DDVh9;
5. A Levitical door-keeper for the ark: rCh. 1523 (?AE A ~ I C A ? A N [BI, ehica$a~ [ALI), b. Zichri, a
Kava [RNA])..
captain In the time of Jehoiada ( 2 Ch. 23 I).
6. A Judahite noble : z Ch. 287 ( e i h a v a [B]).
w. R. s.
ELISHEBA (YJ? 9 K , God is an oath, or perhaps
ELKIAH (BAKE!& [BHA]; AV ELcIA-i.e., Hill~iah),
rather God is health (Che.), see A BISHUA , E LISHUA,
an ancestor of Judith (Judith 8 I).
and cp B ATHSHEBA , BATHSHUA
; similarly ELISABETH,
ELKOSHITE, THE
Ginsb., with most
JEHOSHEBA,
55 33, 50 ; EA[EIICABEB [BL], -BET [AI,
MSS and editions ; IMj7)ag, Baer, with the small M S
-BE [A*F]), wife of Aaron and daughter of Amminadab
(Ex. 623fP). She is also styled sister of N AHSHON ,
Massora; V @ $ ? ~ ~and 9p\j7-$$aalso are found in
and Nahshon b. Amminadab in P is the well-known
MSS.; ~ A K E C A ~ O [BHAQ]),
C
a gentilic noun, derived
chief of Judah in the desert march. P hardly derived
from Elkosh, the name of the town to which the prophet
the Aaronids from a Judahite mother.
Sister of
Nahum belonged (Nah. 1I).
Nahshon is, therefore, most probably a gloss ( RI,)
According to Peiser [ZAT
U, 7 349 ((g7)lr the word contains
which has arisen from a confusion of Elishebas father
the name of the deity, d , [cp
~ KISH]which he finds likcwise in
the name Kushaiah [I Ch. 15 171, add in Prov. 3031 [he reads
with the Judahite. It was, possibly, to avoid this con~
9 for ~P+EI).
5
~
fusion that the writer of I c h . 622 [7] mentions a son
of Kohath (Aarons grandfather) named Amminadab,
Three sites have been proposed.
whose place, however, is elsewhere taken by Izhar (cp
a. There is an el-KiiS not far from the left bank of the
i6. 28). The tribal connection of Aarons wife, thereTigris, two days journey N. of the ancient Nineveh,
fore, is as obscure as that of the wife of his famous son
where the grave of the prophet Nahum is poirhed out.
E LEAZAR [ q . ~ . I,].
According to Friedrich Delitzsch and A. Jeremias,l this is
The name Elisheba may well be pre-exilic (see Gray, HPN,
the place referred to in Nah. 1I. This theory involves
206), and with regard to the difficult question of the origin of
the assumption that Nahum belonged to the ten tribes
Levitical names it may be pointed out that in this case a name
and was born in exile, and has been thought to be
of parallel formation is borne by a devout follower of Yahwb,
the wife of the priest Jehoiada of Judah. See JEHOSHEBA.
favoured by the prophets (presumed) accurate knowledge of local details respecting Nineveh. On the one
ELISHUA (&Whg, God is a help, 5 28; cp
hand, however, the N. Israelitish exiles were not settled
Elisha; ~Alcoye[L]), a s o n o f David[.u., I I ~ ( / ? ) ] in Assyria proper ( z K. 1 7 6 18 I,), and we find no trace
( 2 S. 515, ~A[s]icoyc [BA] ; I Ch. 145, EKTAE [B],
in Nahum of any hope of a return home such as an
(q.v., 3 )
&,lc~y [A]). In I Ch. 36 for ELISHAMA
exile would certainly have expressed somewhere (cp
Elishua should be restored (so bBehaua).
Kue., 0nd.M ii., 5 75. n. 4) ; and, on the other, quite
ELISIMUS, RV ELIASIMU~
( E ~ [ ] I C [ E ] I M O C [BA]),
enough was known of Assyria in Palestine in the time
of Nahum to enable a prophet of such power to
I Esd. 9z8=AV Ezra 1027 ELIASHIB, 5.
sketch the picture that we have in chap. 2. We must
BLIU ( H A E I O Y [BHA], H A I O Y [BCl, ;.e., N.ln9$g,
rather suppose that it was at a later day that the graves
E LIHU ), a forefather of Judith (Judith SI).
of the two prophets who prophesied against hineveh
were sought in the neighbourhood of that city. Whilst
ELIUD (EAIOYA [Ti. WH], L e . , 14?Ib$ God [or
my God 1 is glorious ; cp Ammihud, Abihud), sixth a resting-place for Jonah was found in Nineveh itself
(Nebi Yiinus), the village called el-KiiS seemed, in view
from Zerubbabel in the ancestry of Joseph (Mt. 1x4).
of Nah. 1I , to be appropriate for the grave of Nahum.
See GENEALOGIES ii., 5 2 (c).
That there was a village there, however, in the seventh
ELIZAPHAN ()Fy9?& i.e., God [or, my God]
century E. c. cannot be shown. The earliest reference
shelters ; cp Elzaphan ; ~ ) , [ s ] l c ~ @[BAL]).
a~
to it, according to Jeremias, is in the eighth century
I. A Kohathite prince according to Nu.330 P : but in I Ch.
A.D. ; nor is the grave mentioned before the sixteenth.
158- his name is co-ordiiated with that of Kohath (ehftua$aT
6. A ruined site in Galilee, Elcese, was shown to
[B]). H e is also named in 2 Ch. 29 13. See GENEALOGIES i.,
Jerome as the birthplace of the prophet, and is attested,
0 5 (i.).
2. A prince of Z EBULUN , Nu. 3425 P.
See P ARNACH.
1 See the treatise by Billerbeck and Jeremias cited under
,ELIZUR (YlP)4, God [or my God] is a rock,
N AHUM (beg.).
),::
(9gjp\ao,
1279
1280
ELLASAR
EL-PARAN
>@,h;
e. P. T .
TEREBINTH
[g.v.].
413
ELNAAM
Phcen.
(n&$,
1281
EhNAeAN
([a
ELOHIM ( P'n,'$?U),
:
see N A ME S , 0 11-l.f:
ELQI ( B A ~ I ) ,Mk. 1534. See ELI,ELI.
ELON
L e . , '[sacred] oak,' 69 ; cp ALLON).
(lh9&,
2.
if:
[BAL]). I. A son,
: Gen. 4614 (ampwv
that is, family or clan, of ZEBULUN
[B])=Nu. 2626 (aXwv [L]) ; perhaps the same as
2. One of the six 'minor' judges, most of whose
names 'appear to be those of clans rather than of
individnals ' (Moore, /u@es, xxviii. ) : Jndg. 12 1 1 f.
(Gin. ])$ti, Ba. r 5 ~ ,aAmp [BL], -Y [A]; AhiaZoon).
Elon is really the heros eponyms of Aijalon (or rather
Elon ; see AIJALON, z ) , in the land of Zebulun. The
gentilic is Elonite, ?$\! ; Nu. 2626 ( a X h w v [ ~[BAF],
]~
aXwv1 [L]).
3. ( i l i ' ~ ,Gin. BB. ; properly a place-name ; see NAMES, 569),
a Hictite, father of BASHEMATH
(I), one of Esau'sforeign wives :
Gen. 2634 ( a d w p [AL], -6op [U]),called father of ADAH, z :
Gen. 362 (FAWLL lh.1. a r h r r . ID1. -hov [El. -a[Ll). See BASHEMATH, I
, BEERI;I:I
'
-'
~' '
..
ELOTH
ELPAAL
(h&,
A A ~ A A , -A., EA@.
(I
better, 'palm-tree'lofparan'; F W C T H C T ~ ~ G M I N ~ O Y
1282
EMBALMING
EL-ROI
T H C @ApAN [(A) (D)1, B. T. TEpMIN0OY T. $. [El,
E. TepeBiNeqy T. @. [L] Gen. 146). See PARAN.
[Onk., Sam. plain [ ~ i i m of
] Paran' ; see M OREH,
LAANAIM.
)
EL-ROI
Gen. 1613, RV'"g. ; see NAMES,
5 116, and cp ISAAC, 5 2.
('v? h),
be),
EL-SHADDAI (?@
Gen. 171; see NAMES,
117.
ELTEKE or ELTEKEH (K
A.?-ta-@u-u,EheEKm [A]), a t
land, mentioned with Ekron and Timnah, in the book
of Joshua (1944, ahKaeb [Bl, heKEiN .[L]), \vas
(2123 EhKWBAlM [B], Bh0BKa [L]) a Levitical City in
the inheritance of Dan. It was taken and destroyed by
Sennacherih on his way to Timnah and Ekron after his
defeat of the Egyptian forces that had come to the help
of the Ekronites (see his ' prism ' inscription, Schrader,
KAT(z),171$, 289, 2gz[ET, 15gf., 282, 2851). The
army overthrown by Sennacherib probably consisted of
Jews as well as Ekronites and Egyptians, and a likely spot
for them to unite and take their stand would be up the
WSdy Sar8r (Vale of Sorek) on the high road between
Ekron and Jerusalem, at the foot of the hills-a position
which equally suits the data in Joshua. Sennacherib
might reach it from the coast and the neighbourhood of
Joppa (where he was previously), by the vale of Aijalon
and the easy pass, from the latter to the Vale of Sorek.
No trace of the name, however, has been discovered here
or elsewhere. Kliidet Lez@li,7 m. SW. of Ekron and
near the great N. road (PEPmap, Sh. xvi. ; see map to
J U D ~ Asuits
) the data of Sennacherib's inscription, but
seems incompatible with those of Joshua. Beit Li@i&
in Aijalon (Conder) is too far N. (cp Guthe, Zukunftsbild d. Jesaia, 48). See CHRONOLOGY, 5 21.
G. A. S.
5 118.
(I\*$),
(l;!$v,
ELZABAD
' God has given,' 5 27 ; cp Palm.
711123,de VoguB, Syr. Centr. no, 73. Ili-zabadu, a
Jewish name of fifth 'century B. c . , has been found o n
a tablet from Nippur [Hilprecht]).
I. One of David's warriors ; I Ch. 1212 ( ~ X r u f e p[B].
probably only a scribe's error, ~hefapas[A], ehuapa8
[L]). See D AVID , 5 11 ( u ) iii.
2. h. Shemaiah, a Korahite door-keeper,l I Ch. 267
(eAq@&zO [B] ; ~Xfupa8[A] ; LE{. [L]).
(]@&'e,
ELZAPHAN
' El conceals' or I defends,'
30 ; cp Zephaniah ; ~ A I C A @ A N [BAL]), h. Uzziel, a
ELTOLAD
one of the cities of Judah in
Kohathite Levite (Ex. 622 Lev. lo4). Cp ELIZAPHAN.
the Negeh near the border of Edom (Josh. 1530,
EMADABUN (HMAAABOYN [BA]), I Esd. 5 5 8 RV,
EhecdAaA [AI, -whaA [L], G A B ~ N A A AP I ) , but in
AV MADIABUN.
Josh. 1 9 4 (sh0oyAaA [AI, -AaA [LIZ-ha P I ) assigned
to Simeon. I n I Ch. 429 the name is TOLAD
(i$n ;
EMATHEIS (EM&I~IC [A]), I Esd. 929 RV=Ezra
BwXa8 [A], BouXuELp [B], BoXaO [L]), the prefixed
1028, ATHLAI.
Arabic article 5~ being omitted (so at least Kon. 2 ~ 7 ,
EMBALMING. The Egyptian belief in the conbut apparently not Ges. -K. 5 35 m ; cp ELTEKON, above).
tinued existence after death of the hnman Ka (see
ELUL
~ A o y h[BbKAvid]; in Assyr. UZulu; EGYPT, 5 18) seems to he of very great antiquity. T o
make this existence happy precautions of every Bind were
see Schr. KA T 380, and cp $lh! in Palm. [de VogiiB,
taken; food and drink were placed in the grave that
Syr. Cent. no. 791) occurs in Neh. 615 (EAOYA [B],
the K a might not starve; his favourite movables in
ahoyA [L]) and I Macc. 14.27 ( ~ A o y h[VA], om. K ) as
like manner were buried with him; hut above all
the name of a MONTH ( p . n . , 5 5).
the body had to be preserved so that the K a could
ELUZAI (91W$y,i.e., 'God is my refuge?' 5 29 ;
resume possession at pleasure. Hence the very ancient
azai [Bl, shiwzi [A], E A I B Z E P [L]), one of David's
practice of embalming.
warriors, I Ch. 125t. See D AVID , 5 11 ( a ) iii.
A minute description of the methods employed in his
own time is given by Herodotus ( 2 8 6 8 ) ; with this may
ELYMAIS (A[A]y~&ic[B]). I. In I Macc; 6rf:
be compared the account of Diodorus Siculus (191).
AV has, 'king Antiochus, travelling through the high
According to Herodotus embalming was the business
countries, heard say that Elymais in the country of
of a special guild. He distinguishes three methods.
Persia was a city greatly renowned for riches, silver,
and gold, and that there was in it a very rich temple,'
1 Read 'and Elzabad and his brothers' with 'I5 and some
etc. (cp N ANEA ). RV, however, reads, '.
that in
Heb. MSS (Ki.).
(lhhy),
($959,
..
1283
1284
EMBROIDERY
I. In the costliest of the three the brain was withdrawn through the nose with an iron hook and the
cavity filled with spices. Then an incision was made
in the abdomen on the left side with an ' Ethiopic
stone' (flint knife), the bowels removed and washed
with palm wine, the cavity filled with myrrh, cassia,
and other drugs, and the opening sewed up.
Next
the body was kept for seventy days in natron (according to modern analysis, sub-carbonate of soda),
then finally washed and skilfully swathed in long strips
of byssus smeared with gum. The mummy was usually
enclosed in a sort of case which showed the outlines of
the body, and lastly in a wooden coffin of human shape,
occasionally also in a stone sarcophagus.
2. The second method was simpler, and correspondingly cheaper. Cedar oil was introduced into the body
and removed after it had decomposed the viscera ; the
body was then laid in natron, which, according to Herodotus, wholly consumed the flesh, leaving nothing but
the skin and bones.
3. The third and cheapest method substituted for the
cedar oil of the second some less expensive material.
Broadly speaking, the statements of Herodotus are
confirmed by what we learn from Egyptian sources and
from examination of the mummies themse1ves.l Extant mummies, however, exhibit more methods of embalming than the three just described. In particular
those of the New Empire show a marked advance in the
art, as compared with those of the Old. According to
Erman, however (Egyjt, 315), accurate details as to
this are still wanting. One of the main innovations was
in the treatment of the viscera. In the New Empire
these were removed ; the heart was replaced by a stone
scarabzeus (the scarabwns, as a peculiarly mysterious
and holy creature, was supposed likely to be of essential
use to the dead). The heart, lungs, liver, and other
remaining viscera were set aside in four vases, usually
(from an old misunderstanding) called Canopic. Each
vase was under the protection of a special dEmon-all
four dwmons being sons of Osiris-and the lid of each
took the form of the head of that dwmon: man,
jackal, hawk, cynocephalus. The special function of
the dwmon was to ward off hunger.
This custom of embalming was specifically Egyptian.
The Hebrews did not practise it. It is only as being
an Egyptian custom that the narrator speaks of it as
applied in the cases of Jacob and Joseph (Gen. 502J
[JJ, 5026 [E]). With his statement that the embalming
lasted forty days (50 3) may be compared that of Diodorns
(191)which makes it at least thirty days. Ordinarily,
however, it seems to have taken seventy days. There
is a statement of Josephus (Ant.xiv. 74), referring to
a later period-a statement which stands by itself-that
the body of Aristobulns was embalmed with honey so as
to allow of its being afterwards removed to Jerusalem.
See Wilkinson, Anc. E.. ii. 2 451$ : Maspero, M h . SUY
q d g u e s papyrus du Lo&re, Zl.: k d u e l de Pemdaunze-
EMBROIDERY. RV's substitute for the ' needlework ' of AV in Judg. 5 30 Ps.45 14[IS] ("?el ' broidered work '),
and virtually in Ex. 26 36 27 16 28 39 36 37 38 18
Hebrew 39 zg (DE1 ??@gp).E V gives 'broidered work'
terms.
'their broidered garin Ezek. 16 IO 13 (?Q?iJl),
ments' in 26 16 (D?,???
'
l
!
?
)
.
The Heb. word (rikmuh) isused
metaphorically in Ezek. 17 3 (feathers of an eagle) and I Ch.
29 2 (ornamental stones, or mosaic work). The cognates of m y 1
are Eth. rekern, Ar. rukavna ' to embroider,' also ' t o write' ( ' i o
make points '), with which the Targ. N???? ' coloured spots,' and
theSyr. tarkemdthd 'red pimples,'may he compared, fromwhich
it seems to f h o w that the first step towards embroidery was making points, or little strokes ; diversity of hue would be sought for
in the next stage. In its usual specialised sense of needleworkornamentation of woven fragments, Ar. rabama has passed into
EMBROIDERY
Italian (ricamare) and Spanish (recanzar). @ has IrorxrAal,
6 W X K C A 705
~ ~ ,jar$r8euroB, gpyov B O L K L A T O W
~ ,O L K ~ A O SI. n Ex.
28 4 AV has ' a broidered coat ' for p e n "$I? ; R V ' a coat cf
chequer work.' See T UNIC , and observe that, though in Ps.
45 15 [4nio,?!? (RV 'in, or upon, broidered work') is plainly
corrupt the reference to brocade-work in v. 14 [13l is unquestio;ied (see Che. Ps.W.
of Czermak's physiological
examination of two mummies a t Prague, in SWA W ,1852.
1285
1286
EMEK-KEZIZ
EMERODB
YY?:
PI
(3@
-KKA.
1. Name.
bSs
1287
EMIM
ENAIM
c.
T . K . C.
EMINENT PLACE
P LACE , 6.
(X),
Ezek.
EMMANUEL (EMMANOYHA
AV ; RV I MMANUEL .
1624.
See H IGH
123
1289
in
S. 6 17 was *\py,which
1290
ENAN
EN-GANNIM
t'u
OF, 2).
1 Apparently reading i ? D
]'E.
Compare 7r6hir y p a p p c h v
(?.e., ~ B D
nq?) in Josh. 1549 for KIRJATH-SANNAH.
1292
EN-GEDI
ENOCH
T. K. C.
952fl).
Iu
EN-GEDI (73
[so also outside pause, Ezek.
4710 for ?! Y],--i.e., fountainofthekid,$ror, 104;
GN~AAA[E]I [BWAC]), the modern ,4in Jidi (overlooking the western shore of the Dead Sea), 680 ft. below
The
sea-level, and 612 ft. above that of the lake.
beautiful fountain bursts forth at once a fine stream
upon a narrow terrace or shelf of the mountain. It
was, and is, a spot of rich vegetation in a severely
desolate wilderness. Its vineyards and henna flowers
are referred to in Cant. 1 1 4 , whilst an allusion to its
palm-trees is preserved in its alternative name,
HAZAZON-TAMAK (4.v.) in Gen. 147 z Ch. 202, and
also in Ecclus. 2414 ( I was exalted like a palm tree in
Engaddi).l Hazazon may be connected with the
up which runs one of the main
modern W2dy flu:2&
roads from Engedi to the interior (cp 2 Ch. 20 16, and
see ZIZ, ASCENT OF). Engedi was one of the scenes
of the wanderings of David ( I S. 23 29 [24 I ] ya88i [L]).
The cave which plays a part in this narrative is described as being not at Engedi, but somewhere in the
wilderness. In the oasis itself the present writer found
only insignificant caves ; but Tristram mentions in the
neighbourhood a fairy grotto of vast size. The
strongholds which David and his men inhabited
must have lain about the fountain ; the narrow shelf
could be easily made impregnable, and it is here that
most of the ruins are scattered. Solomon appears to
have fortified Engedi ; for the M T of I K. 9x8 reads
Tamar [Kt.] (not Tadmor [Kr.]) in the wilderness in
the land(?)(cp Josh. 1561f. U V K U ~ ~[B],
S
vvya86i [A],
ayya88ei [L], in the wilderness
En-gedi ). It was
worthy of fortification, for it commands one of the roads
from the Dead Sea Valley to the interior of Judah, and
by it the Edomite invasion of Judah seems to have been
made in the reign of Jehoshaphat ( z Ch. 20, evya8er
[B], eyya88i[L]). It is mentioned once, if not thrice, in
Ezekielsvision of the renovated land (Ezek. 47 IO, ivyaseiv [B], ~ v y a 8 8 .[A], arvya8aip [Q]; see T AMAR, i.).
Josephus praises its fertility, especially its palms and
balsam (Ant.ix. 1z ) , and says it was the centre of a toparchy under the Romans (BY%. 3 s) ; but Pliny omits it in
his list of the toparchies ( H N 5 14 70). To Pliny it was
known as Engadda, a place supplied with palm-groves
and a centre of the Essenes (HN515[r7]). It is
mentioned by Ptolemy (v. 168). In the fourth century,
according to Eusebius and Jerome, it was still a very
large village, whence opobalsamum was obtained
OS 119 15 25467) and with vines (Epit. Paul=, xii. ).
...
@A
1293
nqyp
SIEGE.
ENGRAVE
z Cor. 3 7) ; Engraver
~VTUT~W,
T OOL (Bl?),
ING,
WRIT.
(V!n ,!.!CI
EN-HADDAH
AN.
EN-HAKKORE ( N ~ ~ o - I P~5
, 101, 104-i.e.,
spring of the partridge, but, in the legend, spring of
the caller;
n H r H TOY ~ I T I K A ~ O Y M E N O Y [ R I , IT.
~ ~ ~ K A H T [AL]),
O C
t e name of a fountain in Lehi
(Judg. 1518 19). Identifications of the site are fanciful
(see LEHI).
EN-HAZOR
(-I\!qju,
101
n H r H
acop [BA],
EN-MISHPAT
KADESHi.,
5 2.
ENNATAN
(U?@pIY,
(ENNATAN
ENOCH
IOI),
[BA]),
2.
1 Geseniuss interpretation of
mist be deemed improhable.
?,
2 See CATECKISE,
DEDICATE. Tin and its derivatives, however, are found only in late passages.
I294
ENOCH
ENQB
kc
aiBAL,
1 For parallels see Exos (i., end), NOAH(end). The Alexandriauscholars seem tohave interprcted Enochs supposed moral
crisis in a good sense (cp Philo, De Abuah., F, 2); those of
Palestine (so Frankel) in a had, as if Enoch were on the point
of repenting of his former pious life when God in mercy took
him. In Wisd. 4 10-14, however, nothing is said of Enochs
repentance or change of life ; h e was caught away ($p&yq),
lest wickedness should change his understanding (rvvcmv),
where the wickedness is that of Enochs contemporaries. See
Edersheim on Ecclus. Z.C. ; FrBnkel, Einfluss der paZZstin.
Exegese (SI), 44 3 ; Geiger, Urschrzj?, 198 ; Drummond
Philo Judmus, 2 323 ; and, on the connection of the antipath;
of certain rahhis to Enoch, Hal. REI, 14 21. C p also
APOCALYPTIC, B IO n. I .
1295
T U R E , $18&
2. T h e third son of Midian, Gen. 254 (EV Hanoch), I Ch.
133 (AV Henoch, R V Hanoch ).
3. The eldest son of Reuben (EV Hanoch), Gen.469 Ex.
6 14 Nu. 26 5 I Ch. 53. Not improbably offshoots of the Midianitish clan of Enoch became Israelitish. l h e name can hardly
be connected with (I). Kn. compares that of the sillage called
Hanikiya hy Burckhardt (Trau. in Arab. 2 396) and HenaLiyeh by Doughty ( A r . Des. 2 183 r85), which hrmerly belonged, says the latter, to the great nomad tribe of el-Anezy.
I t is not far to the NE. of Medina.
T. K . C.
Zit. 9 6.
&.
1296
2,
p. 178J).
De Geiz. ad