Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gynecologic Oncology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ygyno
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, USA
c
Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
d
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 8 December 2011
Accepted 3 February 2012
Available online 12 February 2012
Keywords:
CA 125
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Advanced ovarian cancer
Interval debulking
Optimal cytoreduction
a b s t r a c t
Objective. To evaluate the predictive power of serum CA-125 changes in the management of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) for a new diagnosis
of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).
Methods. Using the Cancer Registry databases from our institutions, a retrospective review of patients
with FIGO stage IIIC and IV EOC who were treated with platinum-based NACT-IDS between January 2006
and December 2009 was conducted. Demographic data, CA-125 levels, radiographic data, chemotherapy,
and surgicalpathologic information were obtained. Continuous variables were evaluated by Student's t
test or WilcoxonMannWhitney test.
Results. One hundred-three patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met study criteria. Median number of
neoadjuvant cycles was 3. Ninety-nine patients (96.1%) were optimally cytoreduced. Forty-seven patients
(47.5%) had resection to no residual disease (NRD). The median CA-125 at diagnosis and before interval
debulking was 1749 U/mL and 161 U/mL, respectively. Comparing patients with NRD v. optimal macroscopic
disease (OMD), there was no statistical difference in the mean CA-125 at diagnosis (1566 U/mL v. 2077 U/mL,
p = 0.1). There was a signicant difference in the mean CA-125 prior to interval debulking, 92 v. 233 U/mL
(p = 0.001). In the NRD group, 38 patients (80%) had preoperative CA-125 100 U/mL compared to 33
patients (63.4%) in the OMD group (p = 0.04).
Conclusions. Patients who undergo NACT-IDS achieve a high rate of optimal cytoreduction. In our series,
after treatment with taxane and platinum-based chemotherapy, patients with a preoperative CA-125 of
100 U/mL were highly likely to be cytoreduced to no residual disease.
2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Introduction
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is the leading cause of death
due to a gynecologic malignancy in the United States. In 2010, there
were approximately 21,880 new ovarian cancer cases and 13,850
deaths with over 70% of women with newly diagnosed EOC presenting with advanced stage disease [1]. Primary debulking surgery (PDS)
followed by platinum based chemotherapy has been considered the
standard of care for advanced ovarian cancer [210]. However, the
Corresponding author at: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Francis Street, Boston,
MA 02115, USA. Fax: + 1 617 738 5124.
E-mail address: nhorowitz@partners.org (N.S. Horowitz).
1
Present address: Loma Linda University Medical Center, Division of Gynecologic
Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loma Linda School of Medicine,
Loma Linda, CA, USA.
0090-8258/$ see front matter 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.
doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.006
CA-125 and patient characteristics to predict the likelihood of achieving optimal interval cytoreduction in patients undergoing taxane
and platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval
debulking surgery for a new diagnosis of advanced stage ovarian cancer and to determine an ideal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
cycles before attempting interval debulking surgery. A secondary aim
of our study was to identify factors associated with platinum resistance in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Patients and methods
Institutional Review Board approval of the study was obtained
from both participating institutions. All patients with advanced
stage EOC who were treated with NACT-IDS between January 1,
2006 and December 31, 2009 were identied from the cancer registry
databases at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Some patients were diagnosed
with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)
stage IIIC or IV EOC by formal staging criteria, some were noted to
have advanced disease radiographically and determined to be unresectable by the primary surgeon, and others had a performance status
that precluded PDS. Demographic data, chemotherapy regimen and
number of cycles, surgical-pathologic information, CA-125 levels at
diagnosis, before each treatment cycle, and prior to interval debulking
surgery were retrospectively obtained from patient medical records,
as was timing of recurrence and/or disease status at last follow-up.
The decision to perform PDS vs. NACT-IDS was based on the attending
physician's judgment. In addition, chemotherapy regimen and the
number of cycles that the patient received were determined by the
patient's treating oncologist. Debulking surgery was performed by
board eligible/board certied gynecologic oncologists. All patients
underwent an exploratory laparotomy with the intention of achieving
optimal cytoreduction. An operation that left the patient with a maximal diameter of 1 cm residual disease was considered optimal. All
operative and pathologic reports were reviewed by two individuals.
Following initial eligibility screening, the following inclusion
criteria were applied to determine the nal study population: (1) an
elevated serum CA-125 at time of diagnosis (>35 U/mL); (2) at
least two serum CA-125 level determinations (at the time of diagnosis
and prior to IDS); and (3) clinical and/or radiographic determination
of disease status at the time of last follow-up or recurrence. Denitive
diagnosis of recurrence was taken as a rising CA-125, the histologic
363
Table 1
Patient characteristics.
NRD (N = 47)
Age (years)
Stage
IIIC
IV
Time to surgery (days)
Chemotherapy
Platinum
Taxol
Cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
3
>3
CA-125 U/mL presentation
CA-125 U/mL preoperatively
CA-125 100 U/mL preoperatively
Change CA-125 presentation to preop (%)
Change CA-125 > 80% presentation to preop (%)
Hysterectomy
Bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy
Omentectomy
Bowel surgery
Splenectomy
Diaphragmatic surgery
Liver surgery
66
18
29
102
47
47
25
22
1566
92
38
86
36
47
47
47
12
7
3
0
OMD (N = 52)
( 9)
28.30%
61.70%
( 48)
100%
100%
53.10%
46.90%
( 1810)
( 139)
80.00%
( 18)
76.50%
100%
100%
100%
25.50%
14.20%
6.30%
p-Value
66
( 10)
0.5
21
31
102
40.40%
59.60%
( 45)
0.2
100%
100%
0.9
48%
52%
( 2900)
( 492)
63.40%
( 16)
73%
100%
100%
100%
36.50%
9.60%
21.10%
5.70%
0.8
52
52
25
27
2077
233
33
86
38
52
52
52
19
5
11
3
0.3
0.1
0.001
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.3
0.6
0.1
0.3
364
patients (40.5%) had stage IIIC disease, and 60 (59.5%) were stage IV.
Eighty-three patients (82.5%) had papillary serous histology. Optimal
interval cytoreduction was achieved in 99 patients (96.1%), and 47
patients (47.5%) had complete resection to no residual disease
(NRD). Four patients (3.9%) were suboptimally cytoreduced. The median CA-125 level at diagnosis and before interval debulking was
1749 U/mL (range, 38 to 10,150 U/mL) and 161 U/mL (range, 5 to
2945 U/mL), respectively. Four patients with advanced EOC had a
CA-125 b100 U/mL at the time of diagnosis, prior to initiating NACT.
All patients received platinum and taxane based chemotherapy. Median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 3 (range 18).
Given that 96% of the patients in our study population had optimal
interval cytoreduction, we compared patients with NRD vs. patients
with OMD. Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics in these two groups. There was no statistical difference in the mean
CA-125 level at diagnosis in patients with NRD compared to patients
with OMD (1566 U/mL vs. 2077 U/mL, p = 0.1). However, the mean
CA-125 level prior to interval debulking surgery was lower for patients
with NRD compared to patients with OMD (92 vs. 233 U/mL,
p = 0.001). Fig. 1 compares the CA-125 levels at presentation and preoperatively in patients who underwent IDS to NRD and OMD. Among
the NRD group, 38 patients (80%) had preoperative CA-125 levels
100 U/mL compared to 33 patients (63.4%) in the OMD group
(p= 0.04). Patients with a preoperative CA-125 100 U/mL had a
higher likelihood of optimal cytoreduction to NRD compared to patients
who had a preoperative CA-125 >100 U/mL (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.056 .5).
The four patients who had CA-125 levels 100 U/mL at diagnosis
were cytoreduced to NRD. Neither the age, the number of patients that
received three or more cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CA-125
at presentation, nor the change (absolute value nor percentage) in CA125 obtained at presentation and preoperatively were signicantly different between NRD patients and OMD patients.
Table 2
Variables associated with platinum sensitive disease.
Age (years)
b60
60
Stage
IIIC
IV
Cytoreduction
No residual disease
Optimal but macroscopic
Suboptimal
Cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
3
>3
CA-125 b 35 U/mL prior to surgery
Yes
No
CA-125 drop > 80% initial diagnosis to preop
Yes
No
Platinum
sensitive
(N = 65)
Platinum
resistance
(N = 36)
30
35
46.2%
53.8%
16
20
44.4%
55.6%
0.8
26
39
40%
60%
15
21
41.7%
58.3
0.8
33
30
2
50.8%
46.2%
3.1%
14
22
0
38.9%
61.1%
0%
0.2
26
39
40%
60%
25
11
69.4%
30.6%
0.005
26
39
40%
60%
12
24
33.3%
66.7%
0.5
52
13
80%
20%
22
14
61.1%
38.9%
0.04
Fig. 1. CA-125 at presentation and preoperatively in patients cytoreduced to NRD and OMD.
365
References
[1] Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277300
2010.
[2] Bertelsen K. Tumor reduction surgery and long-term survival in advanced ovarian
cancer: a DACOVA study. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:2039.
[3] Grifths CT. Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian
carcinoma. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1975;42:1014.
[4] Grifths CT, Fuller AF. Intensive surgical and chemotherapeutic management of
advanced ovarian cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:13142.
[5] Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Nieberg RK, Elashoff RM. Primary cytoreductive
surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:41320.
[6] Delgado G, Oram DH, Petrilli ES. Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: the role of
maximal surgical reduction. Gynecol Oncol 1984;18:2938.
[7] Hoskins WJ. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma: principles of primary surgery. Gynecol
Oncol 1994;55:S916.
[8] McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients
with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;334:16.
[9] Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival effect of
maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum
era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:124859.
[10] Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, Fowler JM, Clarke-Pearson D, Burger RA, et al. Phase
III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in
patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology
Group study. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3194200.
366
[11] Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant
chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med
2010;363:94353.
[12] Bristow RE, Duska LR, Lambrou NC, Fishman EK, O'Neill MJ, Trimble EL, et al. A model
for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using
computed tomography. Cancer 2000;89:153240.
[13] Axtell AE, Lee MH, Bristow RE, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Raman S, et al. Multi-institutional
reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal
primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol
2007;25:3849.
[14] Chi DS, Venkatraman ES, Masson V, Hoskins WJ. The ability of preoperative serum
CA-125 to predict optimal primary tumor cytoreduction in stage III epithelial
ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:22731.
[15] Chi DS, Zivanovic O, Palayekar MJ, Eisenhauer EL, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, et al.
A contemporary analysis of the ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict
primary cytoreductive outcome in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal and
peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:610.
[16] Le T, Krepart GV, Lotocki RJ, Heywood MS. Does debulking surgery improve survival
in biologically aggressive ovarian carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:20814.
[17] Chi DS, Liao JB, Leon LF, Venkatraman ES, Hensley ML, Bhaskaran D, et al. Identication of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol
Oncol 2001;82:5327.
[18] Bookman MA, Brady MF, McGuire WP, Harper PG, Alberts DS, Friedlander M, et al.
Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian
cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup. J Clin Oncol
2009;27:141925.
[19] Tiersten AD, Moon J, Smith HO, Wilczynski SP, Robinson III WR, Markman M, et al.
Chemotherapy resistance as a predictor of progression-free survival in ovarian
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical cytoreduction followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group
Study. Oncology 2009;77:3959.
Lim MC, Song YJ, Seo SS, Yoo CW, Kang S, Park SY. Residual cancer stem cells after
interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy could result
in poor treatment outcomes for ovarian cancer. Onkologie 2010;33:32430.
Bast Jr RC, Klug TL, St John E, Jenison E, Niloff JM, Lazarus H, et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian
cancer. N Engl J Med 1983;309:8837.
Zivanovic O, Sima CS, Iasonos A, Bell-McGuinn KM, Sabbatini PJ, Leitao MM, et al.
Exploratory analysis of serum CA-125 response to surgery and the risk of relapse
in patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:20914.
van der Burg ME, Lammes FB, van Putten WL, Stoter G. Ovarian cancer: the
prognostic value of the serum half-life of CA125 during induction chemotherapy.
Gynecol Oncol 1988;30:30712.
Gadducci A, Zola P, Landoni F, Maggino T, Sartori E, Bergamino T, et al. Serum halflife of CA 125 during early chemotherapy as an independent prognostic variable
for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a multicentric
Italian study. Gynecol Oncol 1995;58:427.
Riedinger JM, Wafart J, Ricolleau G, Eche N, Larbre H, Basuyau JP, et al. CA 125
half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction chemotherapy are independent
predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of a French multicentric
study. Ann Oncol 2006;17:12348.
Crawford SM, Peace J. Does the nadir CA125 concentration predict a long-term
outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary? Ann Oncol 2005;16:4750.
Markman M, Federico M, Liu PY, Hannigan E, Alberts D. Signicance of early
changes in the serum CA-125 antigen level on overall survival in advanced
ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:1958.