Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of North Carolina Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The High School
Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Era:
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouthin a Post-9/11
A CriticalReview ofPolicy and Practice
Sally WesleyBonet
RutgersUniversity
sbonet@eden.rutgers.edu
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouth
as measuresof ensuringnational security,have foundtheirways into public secondary
schools?Whataretheeffects
ofthosepolicieson MuslimAmericanyouth2?
And finally,
what
can
be
to
these
in
active
a
changed engage
pedagogicalpractices
youth
citizenship-in post9/11
inclusionand participation
in theirsocieties?
contextformeaningful
The PatriotAct:FromFederalCourtsto Public Schools
The PatriotActis arguably
themostpervasiveofsecuritization
policiesissuedsoonafter9/11had themostnegativeimpacton Araband MuslimAmericanyouth.The
one thatindubitably
AmericabyProvidingApproUSA PATRIOTAct,an acronymfor"Unitingand Strengthening
was submittedseveraldays after
and ObstructTerrorism,"
priateTools requiredto Intercept
ofJusticeto increasethe powers
attacks.It was draftedby theDepartment
the9/11terrorist
communicaoffederalagenciesto conductsearches,use electronicsurveillanceto intercept
and detainsuspectedterrorists.
The PatriotActwas
tionsbothnationallyand internationally,
signedinto law by PresidentGeorgeW. Bush withinfourdays of its presentationto the
House and Senate.Doyle (2002),writingon behalfoftheLibraryofCongress,contendedthat
as well as
the law soughtto further
protectAmericanbordersagainstforeignterrorists
removethosefoundwithinits borders.Doyle also arguedthatthe law enabledthe creation
of new crimes,new penaltiesand facilitatedmoreefficient
proceduresto be used against
terrorists.
domesticand international
ofthelaw (Sales, 2010; Wong,2006) framedit as an
WhileDoyle (2002) and othersupporters
nationalsecurity,the law was not without
innocuousand necessarymeans ofmaintaining
criticsand opponents.Many opponentsof the act viewed it as a dangerousencroachment
on civillibertiesguaranteed
bytheBill ofRights(Vasi & Strang,2009).EvenDoyle (2002) recognizedthatcriticsofthelaw contendthatsomeofitsprovisionsgo too far.The act amended
whichprotectedcivil libertiesand privacyincludingTitleIII of
severalpreviousrestrictions
SurveillanceAct
theOmnibusCrimeControland SafeStreetsActof1968,ForeignIntelligence
forthisresearch,the FamilyEducationRightsand PrivacyAct
(FISA), and, mostpertinent
(FERPA)of1974 (Doyle,2002; Lugg& Soho, 2006; Sales, 2010).
affect
students'formerly
howthePATRIOTActmaypotentially
Luggand Soho (2006)highlight
students
and
their
FERPA
had
parentswithbroadpriformerly
provided
protectedprivacy.
records.
data
and
student
which
Accordingto Lugg and Soho, the
protected
vacy rights,
Generalto access and procurestudentrecordsif theyare
PatriotAct allows the Attorney
withouttheknowledgeofstudents
considerednecessaryfora terrorism-related
investigation,
in
these
involved
Due
to
the
or theirparents.
manypeople's records
investigations,
secrecy
weresubjectedtosearchesand subpoenawithouttheirknowledge.AccordingtotheAmerican
abuseand numerousotherswere
Union(ACLU)over7,000peoplehavereported
CivilLiberties
unawarethattheywerebeingsearcheddue to secrecyrequiredbythelaw (Vasi& Strang,
2009).
thepassing
The literature
suggeststhatthepoliticalclimateaftertheattacksof9/11facilitated
et al. (2008) contendthatcitizenssurrender
ofthisact (Sales, 2010; Wong,2006). Wray-Lake
in exchangefortheguaranteethattheirliberties
to a government
certainindividualfreedoms
will be secured.Polls (Pew ResearchCenter,8/18/2004)show thatshortlyafterthe attacks,
49% ofAmericansagreedthatit was acceptableand wise to sacrificeindividualfreedoms
As timepassed,however,Americansbecameincreasingly
critical
to ensurenationalsecurity.
ofthelaw and itseffects
on theirprivacyand othercivil liberties,
as evidencedby lowerpoll
withthelaw,whichby 2004,had droppedto 38%. Reportsoftargeted
numbersofagreement
as itbecameapparentthatthePatriotActdisproportionately
abusesgaverisetomorecriticism
affected
Arabnon-citizens,
ArabAmericansand Muslims(Salaita,2006).
2 Whiletheterm"MuslimAmerican
I intentionally
youth"encompassesstudentsfrommanyethnicbackgrounds,
use thetermin orderto includenotonlythoseofArabdescent,butthosecomingfromSouthAsian,Africanand
Caribbeanbackgrounds
who identify
as Muslim.
47
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouth
ofsurveillanceand policing.Howeverunsettling
theseincidentsare,it is arguablymorediswhen
children
and
become
turbing
youth
targetedcitizens.
MuslimYouthin America'sSchools:TargetedStudents
themanyinjusticesand hatecrimesArabsand Muslimswere
The researchabove highlights
thesecrimes,who
subjectedtoafter9/11.The lineswereblurredfortheaggressors
committing
Arabnon-citizens,
ArabAmericansand Muslimsfromthefundawereunableto distinguish
mentalistterrorists
who attackedthe WorldTrade Centerand the Pentagon.In fact,Arabs,
America
ArabAmericansand Muslimswereassociatedwiththe"axis ofevil" thatthreatened
and all it standsfor.The rhetoricand politicalclimateofnationalism(as evidencedby the
spike in the displayingof Americanflagson buildings,businessesand homes) seemed to
excludethosewhomightbe "associated"withterrorism
(Grewal,2003).As Islamophobiacontinuedto rise,theraciallychargedcrimesagainstArabAmericansand Muslimsfoundtheir
way intothe schools,and ArabAmericanand Muslimyouthbecame targetsof all typesof
abuse. Wingfield(2006) reportsthatafter9/11,Arab Americanstudentswere subjectedto
as well as physicalviolenceand even death
includingmockery,
manyformsofharassment
and studentsas well.
but
from
teachers
not
from
other
students
threats, only
The literature
by
suggeststhatArab,ArabAmericanand Muslimstudentsare over-targeted
and investigation.
securitization
measuresofsurveillance,
Luggand Soho (2006) suggestthat
theprivacyofstudents'records,whichcan be requestedand acquisithePatriotAct affects
In Abu
ifitis deemednecessaryfora terrorism
tionedbythefederalgovernment
investigation.
the discriminaEl Haj's (2007) workwithPalestinianhighschool-agedyouth,she highlights
tionArab and Muslimstudentsexperienced,particularlyin the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
Muslimyoungwomenwhoworethehijab (head scarfwornas a symbolofreligiouspropriety)
were especiallyvulnerableat theirschools. Abu El-Haj (2007) reportsthatseveralMuslim
veiled femalestudentswere harassed in theirneighborhoodschool, being told by their
withdisteachersthatthey"look like a disgracein thatthing,"while some werethreatened
was
discia
student
their
scarves.
not
remove
if
did
sanctions
Additionally,
they
ciplinary
"terrorist."
was
heard
his
teacher
as
which
the
word
for
"tourist,"
by
plined mispronouncing
This studenthad to resortto legallychallengingthe school districtto have the incident
record.Anotherstudentwas senttotheprincipalfordisciplinary
removedfromhispermanent
thetwintowers,despitethefactthatcountlessstudents
actionafterdrawingtwoplaneshitting
ofall ethnicities,
racesand religionswerereportedas havingdrawnsimilarpictures.A particularlydisturbingeventoccurredon the day of September11th,when an angryteacher
stormedintotheprincipal'sofficeand demandedthatall thePalestinianand Arabstudents
be "roundedup". To thistheprincipalmockingly
replied,"Andwould you likeme to puttargetson theirbacksas well?" (Abu El-Haj,2007, p. 303). In thewake oftheangeragainstthe
9/11culprits,some teachersand school personnelwere unable to distinguishbetweenthe
fanaticand radicalIslamistswho attackedthetwintowersand theirown Muslimstudents,
school.
causingtheirstudentsto feelalienatedand unsafein theirown neighborhood
In her researchwithhigh-schooledaged studentsand parentsin a Sunni communityin
the difficulties
studentsexperienceas a resultof theiridenCanada,Zine (2001) highlights
tificationas Muslims.While Islamophobiawas presentbefore9/11,and Muslim students
have longbeen subjectedto racializedtreatment,
theseexperiencesbecamemoreacute after
9/11.The studentsshe interviewed
and observedcame froma wide cross-section
ofMuslim
studentswhosereportedethnicities
wereSouthAsian,Arab,Somaliand Caribbean.Students
withteacherswho before
wearingthe hijab reportedexperiencingpatronizinginteractions
them
seem
to
their
difference
this
case
in dress)to foreignness.
difference
(in
knowing
equate
One studenttellsofhow teacherswho do notknowherspeak slowlyto heruntilshe replies
in fluentEnglishat whichtimetheteachersseemrelievedthatshe is "OK". Anotherstudent
speaks of the messagesshe receivedabout "whiteness"and how it is equated to all things
49
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouth
ofIslamas a religionthatsupofcourse,itsfollowers.
Theyfurther
arguethattheseportrayals
used
to
of
women
have
been
the
by Americanadministrations
repeatedly
ports oppression
stimulatesupportforAmericanimperialistventuresoverseas.Haddad et al. highlightthat
oftheseerroneousand stereotypical
theunfortunate
conceptsofIslam has been
by-product
difficult
for
Muslim
womenlivingin the
life
more
and
misunderstanding prejudice,making
Westwho mustfightthe dual battleof dealingwithanti-Islamicsentimentsas well as the
assumptionthatIslam oppresseswomen.
prominent
Researchalso pointstothefactthatthebodiesofwomenhave oftenbeenthesitesuponwhich
battlesofnationalismhave been fought(Abu Lughod,2002). Zine (2006) contendsthatthe
Muslimveil [hijab]is arguablyone ofthe mostprovocativeformsof dressas it is oftenthe
ofIslamicgenderprejudices,like genderoppressionand
symbolofWesterninterpretations
bodies of veiled womennot onlyrepresentdifference,
to
how
the
She
subjugation. points
Westernnotionsof feminism
but also allude to loyaltyto a patriarchalorder,threatening
Haddad et al. (2006) contendthatthehijab is seen by Americansas symbolic
and liberation.
as well as a dangerto dominantperceptionsof secularity.They argue
ofculturaldifference
thatthesenotionsframetheMuslimfemalebody as a symbolofthe "clash of civilizations"
been used as a meansby
betweenWesternand Islamicnations.This symbolismhas further
Muslim
withtherhetoricof"liberating"
war in Araband Muslimcountries,
whichto justify
involveU.S.
around
the
discourse
of
the
Much
male
womenfromtheir
military
oppressors.
forinstance,has been about"saving"womenfromthetyrannical
mentin Afghanistan,
gripof
with
U.S.
that
the
the Taliban regime,ironicallythe same regime
militaryarms
supported
how
the discourse
This
to expel the Sovietsout ofthe country.
whenattempting
highlights
when
administraaroundIslam's oppressiveways is used selectively,specificallyat times
tionsneed to drumup supportforwars.
to thebeliefthatthehijab is an undeniablesymbolofoppression,Muslimwomen
Contrary
a means
haveused theveil as a formofpoliticalprotest(Mushaben,2008).The veil represents
means
of
and
a
bodies
of
women's
the
Euro-centric
ofresisting
norms, objectification
protecstatement
tionfromthemale gaze. It is also an anti-imperialist
gendered
markingalternative
norms.ManyMuslimwomenview thehijab as a way ofmaintaining
modestyand warding
with
in
accordance
women's
offthe sexualizingof
(Haddad
bodies,
religiousprescriptions
thatthehijab,whichis understoodby manynon-Muslimsas a
et al., 2006). This highlights
is in factformanywomena liberatory
formofoppressionand subjugation
practice,wherethey
statements.
make
faith
and
can statetheiridentities,
anti-imperial
openlypracticetheir
of"Othering"MuslimAmericanYouth
Discussion:Effects
The researchreviewedhere suggeststhatdominantand widespread anti-Araband antiMuslim sentiments,fueledby the discriminatory
practicesof agencies representingthe
whichled to the disturbing
These
arena.
school
infiltrated
the
have
sentiments,
state,
public
to students'educational
destructive
have
been
detailed
discrimination
of
above,
practices
of
and
sense
belonging.Wingfield(2006)
aspirations,outcomes,psychosocial abilities,
of Arabcontendsthatnationalsecuritypolicies have resultedin the civic marginalization
Americans.Wray-Lakeet al. (2008) arguethatyouth"learnwhat it means to be a citizen
througheverydayexperiencesof membershipin theircommunitiesand opportunitiesto
exerciserightsand fulfillobligations"(p. 85). When youthfeel subjugatedby harassment,
violence,and constantattackssuggestingthattheyare the ultimate"other",and outside
the boundariesof the collectiveimaginedcommunityof the Americannation-state,
they
are likelyto feelless obligatedto thisnationand are less apt to become civicallyengaged
and colleagues(2008) warnthatthe implicationsof these "othering"techhere.Wray-Lake
dire
for
are
citizenship;when ArabAmericanand Muslimyouthfeelexcludedfrom
niques
the polity,it mighterode allegiance to the United States and increasesallegiance to the
families'nativecountriesof origin.
51
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouth
and "LittleLaden".In thislight,one mustwonderhow ArabAmericanstudentscome
"traitor"
theirplace in Americansociety,and how theyaremadeto feel"othered"in real
tounderstand
further
contendsthatthethreatofemotionaland physical
and oftendangerous
ways.Wingfield
who mightotherwiseexpressconcernabout
Arab
students
silence
can
violence
effectively
ArabAmerican
native
homelands.Accordingly,
in
their
involvement
dangersposed by U.S.
with
U.S.
to
or
seem
silent
studentsmightfeelobligatedto remain
foreign
policy,while
agree
in
this
herresearch
addresses
here.
Sarroub
theirownpositioning
to negotiate
(2002)
struggling
she intermembers
the
of
in
U.S.
witha YemeniAmericancommunity the
community
Many
them.
that
followed
anti-Islam
viewedfeltsilencedby the9/11attacksand thewave of
They
at
feltthatin thatclimate,especiallyforArabsand ArabAmericanswho becamehyper-visible
American
with
was conflatedwithagreeing
thetime,beingAmericanand "patriotic"
foreign
membersarguedthatone oftherightsofAmerican
policy.Sarroubstatesthatmanycommunity
citizenshipwas thefreedomofexpressingcriticismsofU.S. foreignpolicywhile remaining
safe.WhileArabAmericanadultssee beingcriticalofU.S. policiesas a righttheyattain,the
forAraband Muslimyouthwho are surrounded
case mightbe moredifficult
by teachersand
who at bestlooktheotherwaywhenstudentsare attackedor harassed.This mayresult
staff,
civicdisengagement.
and ultimately
in thesilencingoftheseyouth,disillusionment
Implicationsand FutureResearch
The researchreviewedhere strongly
practicesof policing,
suggeststhatthe discriminatory
Patriot
the
informed
as
federal
Act,which dissurveillanceand searchingby
by
agencies
for
theviolence,
the
tone
and
Americans
Arab
Muslims,setting
targetArabs,
proportionately
Federal
in
schools.
theseyouthexperience
and discrimination
harassment
agencies,oftenthe
wherestudents
the
site
which
is
punitivearmsofthe state,set the toneforpublic schools,
therealmof
within
is
are socializedintothenorms,beliefsand practicesofthestate.It here,
the
publicschooling,whereyouthlearnwho is deemedworthyand fallswithin boundaries
and school
of"citizen"and who is excluded.Teachers,staff,
ofthis"imaginedcommunity"
and sanctioning
wayspersonneldeal withMuslimAmericanyouthin oftendiscriminatory
as well as theircivic inclutheiracademicand psychosocialwell-being,
affecting
negatively
In the process,clear messagesare sentaboutthosewho are deemed
sion and engagement.
pushingtowardsexcellence,and thosewho are not.It is clearfromthe
worthyofprotecting,
abovethatMuslimAmericanstudentsare assumedto be suspect,less capable acaliterature
somehow"less American".The literature
paintsa bleak pictureof
demicallyand ultimately
how MuslimAmericanyouthcome to understandtheirpositioningin Americansociety.A
fewunsettling
questionsremainafterthisreview:Ifyouthfeelsilencedby theviolencethey
in
experience schools,how can theythenbecome activelyengagedin the social and civic
how will theyenvisphereswithintheirschools,communitiesand country?Furthermore,
of
are
surrounded
when
sion theirfuturelifeoutcomes
by images membersof their
they
and
to
national
security, ones to be feared?
groupas theultimate"other",a threat
Whilethe answersto thesequestionsare complexand requiremoreattention,I believe a
ofschoolpoliciesand pedagogicalpracticesmightplace us on theright
criticalexamination
that
track.As suggestedby Abu El-Haj(2007),educatorsmustcreateclassroomcommunities
in values,relithecapacityto speak and listenrespectfully
nurture
regardlessof differences
and politics.She specifically
opportusuggestscreatingcurricular
giousbeliefs,perspectives,
nitiesto discusstheeventsbywhichArabsand Muslimsbecamepositionedas a threatto the
nationstate.Safe spaces need to be createdin classroomswhereteachersand studentscan
eventin American
discusstheeventsofSeptember11, notmerelyas a tragicand devastating
in America's
and
Muslim
of
Arabs
the
redefined
events
that
as
the
but
positioning
history,
racialand nationalhierarchy.
Althoughthehighschoolis butone ofthespaces Araband Muslimyouthoccupy,itscentral
makesit an
a sense ofnationand belonging,
theirforming
rolein theirlives,and specifically
53
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
EducatingMuslimAmericanYouth
system(SEVIS). B.Y.U. Education
Wong,. (2006).A case studyofthestudentand exchangevisitorinformation
and Law Review,2, 379-454.
A. K., & Flanagan,. . (2008). Contestedcitizenshipand social exclusion:Adolescent
L., Syversten,
Wray-Lake,
views ofthesocial contract.
ArabAmericanimmigrants'
Science,12(2),84-92.
AppliedDevelopmental
embodiedby
Zaal, M., Salah,T. & Fine,M. (2007).The weightofthehyphen:Freedom,fusion,and responsibility
Americanwomenduringa timeofsurveillance.
Science,11(3),164-177.
AppliedDevelopmental
youngMuslim&
Zine,J.(2001).Muslimyouthin CanadianSchools:Educationand thepoliticsofreligiousidentity.
Anthropology
EducationQuarterly,
32, 399-423.
lines.
fromtheeducationalfront
educationas transformative
Zine,J.(2004).Anti-Islamophobia
pedagogy:reflections
AmericanJournalofIslamicSocial Sciences,21(3), 110-119.
GenderedIslamophobiaand experiencesot veilingamongMuslimgirlsin a
Zine,J.(2006). Unveiledsentiments:
CanadianIslamicschool.Equity& Excellencein Education,39, 239-252.
55
This content downloaded from 141.225.112.99 on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:27:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions