Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Thesis
By
MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
MAY 2013
A Thesis
By
SANJIT CHANDRA BARMAN
Examination Roll No. 12 Ag. ENVS. JJ-15M
Registration No. 28022
Session 2000-2001
Semester: January-June, 2013
Submitted to
Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
MAY 2013
______________________________
(Prof. Dr. Muhammad Aslam Ali)
Supervisor
______________________
(Prof. Dr. M.A. Sattar)
Co-Supervisor
____________________
(Prof. Dr. M.A. Sattar)
Chairman, Defense Committee
&
Head, Department of Environmental Science
Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
May 2013
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At the beginning, the author bows to the grace and mercy of the almighty God without whose
desire he could not make his dream a reality, a successful completion of the research and submission
of the dissertation.
The author really does not have adequate word to express his deepest sense of gratification ever
indebtedness and sincere appreciation to his benevolent teacher and honorable research supervisor
Professor Dr. Muhammad Aslam Ali, Department of Environmental Science, Bangladesh
Agricultural University, Mymensingh, for his scholastic guidance, valuable suggestions, timely
instructions, and constant encouragement for the successful completion of the research work.
The author is deeply indebted to his co-supervisor Professor Dr.M .A Sattar, Department of
Environmental Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh for his kind
cooperation, incisive criticism of the earlier draft of this study. His contribution and suggestions
helped the author to overcome many errors during the course of this work.
The author fells obliged to express heartfelt gratitude to all of his respected teachers taught him
and showed affections upon him throughout his study at the faculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh
Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
The auther expressces his cordial thanks to his wife Krisna Rani Sarker who helped him directly by
continuous support during the whole period of study at BAU, Mymensingh.
Last but no way the least, the author would like to convey all his gratitude and respect to
his parents for their heartiest blessings, endless sacrifices and dedicated efforts to establish
his luminous carrier. He also owes a debt of gratitude to his a brothers and all other
relatives for their blessings, constant inspiration an endless love, who have sweet much to
bring him up in todays position and keen interest to have higher studies continued.
Finally, the author expresses his deepest sense of gratitude and sincere thanks to all his
kith and kin, friends, well wishers and all those whose names could not be mentioned, but
who have extended their co-operation, continuous inspiration blessing throughout the
entire period of academic fife.
The author
May 2013
iv
ABSTRACT
A field experiment was carried out at Muktagacha, Mymensingh during the
Boro season of 2012-2013 to find out the effects of alternate wetting and
drying irrigation (AWDI) methods on the growth and yield of rice. The
experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with six
(6) irrigation treatments. Three treatments, T1, T3 and T5 were selected in which
continuous standing water was maintained at a depth of' 5cm. Three AWDI
treatments, T2, T4 and T6 were used in which irrigations were applied when
water level dropped 20, 10 and 15cm below ground level, respectively. All the
irrigation treatments significantly affected the rice yield and some other yield
contributing parameters. The study revealed that the highest grain yield (5.82
t/ha) was found in treatment T6. On the contrary treatment T1 gave a yield of
3.35 t/ha, T2 4.47 t/ha, T3 4.81 t/ha, T4 5.46 t/ha and T5 5.05 t/ha. The higher
water requirement were found in the treatments T1 (131.8cm), T3 (131.8cm)
and T5 (126.8cm) respectfully while treatment T2, T4 and T6 needed 111.8,
121.8 and 116.8cm respectfully. The study revealed that AWDI plots
significantly increased the number of effective tillers per hill, grain yield, straw
yield and biological yield compared to the control plots. Although the AWDI
treated (T2) plots showed maximum water savings (15.1%) however rice yield
(4.47 t/ha) was significantly lower compared to T6 treatment (5.81 t/ha).
Considering all the results from the experiment, it can be inferred that AWDI
treatment T6 (15cm below ground level), would be the best choice for the water
saving (11.3%) and highest rice yield in silty loam soil and highest water
productivity index was T6 (0.498) and lowest water productivity index was T1
(0.254). Under different irrigation treatments shows percent yield increased,
percent water saved, and increased water productivity index.
LIST OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
TITLE
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iv
ABSTRACT
CONTENTS
vi
LIST OF TABLES
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
1.
INTRODUCTION
1-3
2.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
4-11
3.
12-26
3.1
Experimental Site
12
3.1.1
Location
12
3.1.2
Soil characteristics
12
3.1.3
Climatic conditions
13
3.2
13
3.2.1
14
3.2.2
15
3.2.3
Fertilizer application
15
3.2.4
15
3.2.5
Intercultural operations
16
3.3
Irrigation Treatments
16
3.4
Transplantations of Seedlings
17
3.4.1
Selection of variety
17
3.4.2
Transplanting
17
3.5
Irrigation Requirement
18
3.6
18
3.7
19
vi
PAGE
3.8
19
3.9
19
3.10
Harvest Operations
20
3.10.1
20
3.10.2
20
3.10.3
20
3.10.4
20
4.
4.1
Irrigation Treatments
24
4.2
27
4.2.1
27
4.2.2
28
4.2.3
28
4.2.4
28
4.2.5
29
4.2.6
29
4.2.7
30
5.
31-33
REFERENCES
34-38
vii
24-31
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
PAGE
3.1
12
3.2
13
3.3
15
3.4
17
3.5
18
4.1
25
4.2
26
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
SL. NO.
PAGE
3.1
3.2
21
3.3
21
3.4
22
3.5
22
3.6
23
4.1
25
4.2
27
28
4.4
29
4.5
30
4.3
ix
14
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AWDI
BAU
BRRI
cm
Centimeter
FAO
Fig.
Figure
Kg
Kilogram
Kg/ha
LSD
LS
Level of Significance
MV
Modern Variety
MOP
Muriate of Potash
RCBD
TSP
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Alternate Wet and Dry Irrigation (AWDI) is a water management system where
rice fields are not kept continuously submerged but are allowed to dry
intermittently during the rice growing stages. Water is the most important
component of sustainable rice production, especially in the traditional rice growing
areas of Asia. From time immemorial, rice has been grown in lowland areas under
flooded conditions. More than 75 percent of the world's rice is produced under these
conventional irrigation practices (i.e., continuous flooding) (Van der Hoek et al.,
2001). Rice grown under traditional practices in the Asian tropics and subtropics
requires between 700-1500 mm of water per cropping season depending on soil
texture (Bhuiyan, 1992). However, this conventional water management method
leads to a high amount of surface runoff, seepage, and percolation that can account for
50-80 percent of the total water input (Sharma, 1989).
Recently, the scarcity of, water has been increasing worldwide. By 2025, the per
capita available water resources in Asia are expected to decline by 15-54 percent
compared with that of 1990 availability (Guerra et al., 1998). Agriculture's share of
water will decline at faster rate because of the increasing competition for available
water from urban and industrial sectors. Despite the constraints of water scarcity, rice
production and productivity must rise in order to address the growing demand for
rice driven largely by population growth and rapid economic development in Asia.
Therefore, producing more rice with less water is therefore a formidable challenge
for achieving food and water security for these regions (Facon, 2000). In other
words, the efficiency of water use in irrigated rice production systems must be
significantly increased.
One such strategy to address this need is the use of alternate wet/dry irrigation
method (AWDI) for cultivated rice. This method is increasingly used in parts of
Asia, especially in Japan, China, Korea, Thailand, Indonesia and India. Contrary to
most lowland rice-growing practices used throughout the world, the rice field is not
realizing
higher
and
more
profitable
production
(Uphoff
and
Randriamiharisoa, 2002; Anthofer, 2004; Namara et al., 2004; Li et al., 2005; Sato,
2005; Uphoff, 2006).
However, good water control and minimal use of water is both the most controversial
component in rice farming and the factors most difficult for farmers to regulate.
Also, due to the variation in climatic and edaphic factors, results from AWDI
methods adopted in one area may not correlate with other areas. The current study,
therefore, was undertaken to identify the effects of alternate wetting and drying
periods on rice productivity, soil environment. e.g. soil moisture content, soil
porosity and microbial growth under field condition.
Considering the above views and points the present study was undertaken to
achieve the following major objectives:
To find out the growth performance and yield of rice under different
irrigation management practices.
To determine the suitable irrigation water management practice (AWDI),
percents of water use efficiency for optimum rice yield and percent of water
savings and increased water productivity index.
To determine the effects of water management practices (AWDI,
Conventional Flooding Irrigation) on soil moisture content, soil organic
matter content, soil pH and soil nutrient availability.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Obermueller and Mikkelsen (2013) conducted the growth and development of
rice, cv. Calrose, was closely observed from seedling stage to maturity in a
controlled greenhouse environment. At harvest the yield components, total yield of
grain and straw, root production and distribution, and total uptake of N, P, K, Ca,
Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and S were determined. Rice plants grown under flooded
conditions were superior to non-flooded plants except for the first 40 days after
planting.
Tejendra et al. (2011) proposed that alternate Wet and Dry Irrigation (AWDI) is a
water management system where rice fields are not kept continuously submerged
but are allowed to dry intermittently during the rice growing stage. A field
experiment was conducted in Chiba, Japan during the rice growing season (MaySeptember) of 2008 to assess AWDI and continuous submerged water management
practices for their effects on productivity, the surrounding environment, water
savings, and Water Productivity Index (WPI). The impact of age of seedlings and
plant spacing were also assessed.
Iswandi et al. (2011) conducted this communication reports on separate research
efforts in India and Indonesia to evaluate the effects that modifying methods of
plant, soil, water and nutrient management could have on populations of soil
organisms, particularly on those that can have beneficial consequences for crop
growth and yield. Comparison of these parallel studies draws attention to the
impacts that management can have on the soil biota, given that certain organisms
are known to have positive implications for plants nutrition, health, and
productivity.
Issaka et al. (2008) conducted rice production in Ghana faces several problems:
notably water shortage, low soil fertility, poor soil and water management and
appropriate varieties for the various production systems. A study was started in
2006 and repeated in 2007 with the main objective of comparing the effect of four
soil and water management practices on the growth and yield of four rice varieties.
Joginder et al. (2008) proposed that long-term sodic-water irrigation may
adversely affect the quality of soil organic carbon along with some soil properties.
The extent to which the adverse effects can be ameliorated through the use of
gypsum and amendments needs to be known. Soil properties and microbial biomass
carbon (MBC) were studied after 14 years of sodic water (SW) irrigation and
application of different levels of gypsum, farmyard manure (FYM), green manure
(GM), and wheat straw (WS) to a sandy loam soil. Irrigation with SW increased
pH, electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, exchangeable sodium
percentage (ESP), and bulk density, and decreased final infiltration rate of soil.
Application of gypsum and organic amendments reversed these trends. Decrease in
MBC due to SW irrigation was from 132.5 to 44.6 mg/kg soil in the 0-75 mm soil
layer and from 49.0 to 17.3 mg/kg soil in the 75-150 mm soil layer. Application of
gypsum and organic amendments significantly increased MBC; GM and FYM were
more effective than WS. Changes in soil ESP explained 85 and 75% variation in
MBC in the unlamented and organically amended SW treatments, respectively.
John et al. (2008) proposed that microbial activities important to effects on crop
productivity and nutrient cycling can be altered by agricultural management
practices. This study was conducted to determine whether soil microbial
populations and their N cycling activities differ between conventional and
alternative management practices. Physical, chemical, and microbial soil properties
were measured at soil depth intervals of 0 to 7.5, 7.5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm at a site
in southeastern Pennsylvania during the second and fifth years after conversion
from a conventional, chemically intensive system to alternative systems utilizing
legumes and animal manure as N sources.
Hossain (2008) conducted experiment on a small scale at the farm of Bangabandhu
Sheikh Mujibur Raman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur to find out
possible effects of different level of irrigation on the production of MV Boro rice
percent higher than farmers practice (5.96 t/ha) at Kapasia, Gazipur. Such a
practice is economically more beneficial than the traditional practice of continuous
standing water (BRRI, 2006).
BRRI (2007) reported from experiments the interaction effect of irrigation interval
based on perched water table depth for water saving and N fertilization methods in
rice cultivation. In this experiment, conventional method of fertilizer application
was found better. Poly Venal Carbon (PVC) tube was concluded to be one of the
easiest tools for determining perched water table depth for water saving in rice
field.
Experiments conducted by BINA on different rice varieties revealed that
intermittent irrigation technique, what they call alternate flooding and drying
irrigation (AFDI) saved more than 40 percent irrigation water with insignificant
reduction in yield (BINA 2007). Hence BINA recommended maintaining an
interval of 5 to 7 days between consecutive irrigations. It was also found that AFDI
technique reduced continuous decline of water table (BINA. 2007).
Islam et al. (2005) conducted experiments oil glass house at the Bangladesh
Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) farm to find out the effect of water stress in
two drought tolerant rice mutants developed by BINA. Five irrigation treatments
were used in randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated thrice. The
found the highest grain yield (7.07 t/ha) in treatment T3 (3 cm standing water +
water stress up to 80 percent field capacity), hill the highest water productivity was
found in treatment T5 (3 cm standing Neater + water stress up to 40 percent field
capacity). The study revealed that the mutants could withstand stress up to 40
percent field capacity.
Ceesay and Uphoff (2005) conducted in lowland rice farming, water control is the
most important management practice that determines the efficacy of other
production inputs such as nutrients, herbicides, pesticides, farm machines,
microbial activity, mineralization rate, etc. Poor drainage that keeps soil saturated is
detrimental to crops and degrades soil quality. In many rice irrigation systems,
lieu of 5cm which resulted in 25 percent savings in irrigation water than that of
transplanted rice.
Moya et al. (2001) used the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation
technique and continuous water application were to evaluate the on-farm water
management strategies for rice production in Tuanlin and Wenjiaxiang, Huberi,
China during the wet seasons of 1999 and 2000. Detailed data regarding on-farm
water management strategies, such as frequency and timing of irrigation, depth of
water applied, sources of water, pond and pump use were collected from 30 sample
farmers from each site through field interviews. Input and output data of rice
production including prices were also collected for economic comparison of the
two sites in terms of rice production and profitability. Results showed that most
fanners do not practice a pure form of AWD or of continuous flooding. However,
more farmers in both sites practiced AWD in 2000, when there was a higher
shortage of irrigation water than in 1999.
Cabangon et al. (2001) executed a study whose objective was to quantify the
impact of alternate welting and drying irritation (AWD) and timing of N-fertilizer
application on rice growth, water input, water productivity and fertilizer-use
efficiency. The experiment was carried out in Jinhua. Zhejiang Province and in
Tuanlin, Hubei Province, China following a Split-plot design. The main plots
received 2 water treatments (W1 = AWD irrigation and W2 = continues flooding).
The subplot consisted of four N-application treatment (Fo = Control, no = N
fertilizer, F1 = 2 splits, as farmers practices; F2 = 4 and F3 = 5 or 6 splits
depending on the season) The total N input all season was 150 and 180 kg N/ha in
Jinhua and TL, respectively.
Didiek (1998) conducted a field experiment at the farm level in Indonesia, to study
intermittent irrigation techniques and their influences on water saving. The aim of'
the study was to understand the response of several rice varieties under various
intermittent irrigation patterns and to determine water use efficiency and
effectiveness. The experimental design was split plot design with three replications
10
of five levels of intermittent irrigation. The sub-plot factors were three rice verities.
There was no correspondence between variety and intermittent irrigation for crop
growth and yield. Flooding of 5 to 7 cm during the vegetative and ripening stages
or flooding during the vegetative and reproductive stages showed higher water use
efficiency than continuous flooding. The yield of rice variety was higher than
Wricul and Ciliwung rice verities under all intermittent irrigation treatments.
Dalal and Mayer (1987) proposed that microbial biomass in soils with different
clay contents and under different management, corrected for years of cropping.
Microbial biomass has declined in both soils after 30 years of cropping. However,
the Waco soil has retained more of its microbial biomass carbon due to its higher
clay content, which has helped preserve its stocks of organic carbon.
11
CHAPTER 3
Organic
matter (%)
Zn
Soil
(%)
(ug/g)
(ml/100g)
(ug/g)
(ug/g)
texture
2.59
0.15
0.19
15
0.56
Silty loam
12
Rainfall (cm)
Relative
humidity
(%)
Total rainfall
(mm)
No. of
rainy
days
January
27.30
12.40
19.85
62
February
0.5
29.50
14.90
22.20
46
March
221.5
33.10
20.60
26.85
51
April
733.1
24
30.50
21.60
26.05
73
13
`N
T1
T2
Treatment 1
1.5 m
1.0 m
T3
1.5 m
1.5 m
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
Treatment 4
Treatment 5
Treatment 6
T2
T3
T4
T3
T4
T5
T4
T5
T6
T5
T6
T1
T6
T1
T2
Replication 2
Replication 3
Replication 1
14
130
MOP
Gypsum
Zinc sulphate
166
50
9.52
After Transplantation
Fertilizer
Date of Application
Urea
05-02-13
Dose
(kg/ha)
170
15
small perforations and the water level inside the pipe was at the same level as that
of outside. With the progress of time, the water in the soil got depleted and at some
moment the standing water above the ground level disappeared. But a close
observation revealed that there was water in tile soil and that level was indicated by
the water level inside the pipe. Thus, irrigation water was applied when the
depleting water table inside the pipe reached a certain level.
3.2.5 Intercultural operations
Since the weed competes with the rice plant and shares the available nutrients in the
soil, all the weeds were uprooted by hand whenever it got its head up in the
experimental plots.
3.3 Irrigation treatments
Different levels of irrigation were applied to determine the suitable one considering
the rice growth and yield, water savings technology. In each of the cases, the field
was allowed to be dried up to a certain level. The depleted water table was
observed from the pipes installed in the field. A wooden stick scale was used to
measure the water level inside the pipe. The experiment had six irrigation
treatments.
The treatments were as follows:
T1 = 10 cm standing water maintained 1st 3 weeks, then kept 5cm throughout
the growing season;
T2 = Irrigation when water level in the pipe fell 20cm below the ground
level;
T3 = 5 cm standing water maintained throughout the growing season;
T4 = Irrigation water when water level fell 10cm below ground level;
T5 = Irrigation water for 1st 3 weeks, then mid season drain out, re-flooding
at flowering
T6 = Irrigation when water level in the pipe fell 15cm (6) below the ground
level.
16
Supplying entity
Date of sowing
BRRIdhan 28
BADC,
Muktagacha,
Mymensingh
01-01-13
25
3.4.2 Transplanting
The seedlings were collected on 28th January, 2013 and were transplanted in the
plots on the same day. Transplantation details are given in the Table 3.5.
17
28-01-13
15
25
18
Furthermore, water loss was also calculated based on the amount of water supplied
in each plot. A simple measuring scale was used to determine the level of water
(cm) lost each day during wetting period.
3.9 Determination of Water Productivity Index (WPI):
Water-use efficiency is intrinsically ambiguous in relation to crop production
(Sharma, 1989; Bhuiyan et al., 1995). In this paper, WPI was calculated as the ratio
of crop yield (kg/h) per unit water m3/h) supplied as defined by Jaafar et al. (2000).
It includes irrigation, rainfall and antecedent soil moisture.
Water productivity index (kg/m3) =
19
20
21
22
23
CHAPTER 4
24
Total
amount of'
irrigation
(cm)
27.2
34.6
131.8
20
27.2
34.6
111.8
15.1
10
20
27.2
34.6
131.8
T4
20
27.2
34.6
121.8
7.59
T5
20
27.2
34.6
126.8
3.8
T6
20
27.2
34.6
116.8
11.3
Treatment
No. of
Irrigation
Water for
land
preparation
(cm)
T1
10
20
T2
T3
% water
saved
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Irrigation
treatments
Treamtents
25
Table 4.2. Effect of different irrigation treatments on the yield contributing parameters of rice (BRRIdhan 28)
Treatments
Plant
height
(cm)
Total
tiller
plant-1
No of
effective
tiller plant-1
Panicle
length
(cm)
Filled
grain
Unfilled
grain
1000GW(g)
Grain
Yield
(t/ha.)
Straw
Yield
(t/ha.)
Biological
Yield
(t/ha.)
HI
(%)
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
CV (%)
LSD
Level of Sig.
79.96b
81.08a
81.95a
82.50a
82.33a
82.97a
3.63
1.957
**
11.20d
12.53c
13.91b
16.35a
14.64b
16.52a
5.34
1.155
**
7.09e
10.64d
12.20c
14.34ab
13.41b
15.21a
5.54
0.938
**
20.09b
22.30a
22.85a
22.22a
22.95a
22.55a
3.07
1.332
*
86.82e
90.58e
131.70c
140.49b
118.99d
163.14a
2.97
4.365
**
26.32a
22.28b
20.90bc
19.50c
13.70d
12.73d
5.55
1.539
**
23.93
24.76
23.43
23.87
23.81
24.09
3.39
NS
3.35e
4.47d
4.81c
5.46b
5.05c
5.82a
3.73
0.237
**
4.34d
5.49ab
5.12bc
5.93a
4.69cd
5.81ab
6.99
0.663
**
7.69c
9.96b
9.93b
11.39a
9.74b
11.63a
3.56
0.693
**
43.60d
44.85cd
48.48abc
47.95bc
51.95a
50.05ab
4.15
3.517
**
T1 = 10 cm standing water maintained 1st 3 weeks, then kept 5cm throughout the growing season;
T2 = Irrigation when water level in the pipe fell 20cm below the ground level;
T4 = Irrigation water when water level fell 10cm below ground level;
T5 = Irrigation water for 1st 3 weeks, then mid season drain out, re-flooding at flowering
T6 = Irrigation when water level in the pipe fell 15cm (6) below the ground level.
Water
productivity
index (WPI)
kg/m3
0.254
0.399
0.364
0.448
0.398
0.498
3.78
0.084
**
Here,
Treatment T1 gave a low amount of yield. Due to continued flooding tillering and effective tillering was low. As a result production was low.
Treatment T6 gave a highest amount of yield. Because the alternate wet and dry irrigation treatments significantly affected the rice yield and some other yield
contributing parameters. So due to AWDI method increased tillering and effective tillering and as a result treatment T6 gave a highest yield and production was
high.
26
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Irrigation treatments
Fig. 4.2 Variations of number of effective tiller hill-1 for different irrigation
treatments
27
significant.
25
24.5
24
23.5
23
22.5
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Irrigation treatments
28
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Irrigation treatments
29
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Irrigation Treatments
30
CHAPTER 5
31
5.1 Conclusions
The alternate wetting and drying irrigation treatments significantly affected
the rice yield and some other yield contributing parameters. The results
revealed that though the highest grain yield (5.82 t/ha) was found in the
treatment T6.
Treatment T6 gave a yield of 5.82 t/ha which was very close to the highest
one obtained in T4. So, the experiment result proved that AWDI method T6,
T4 and T2 appears to produce the best output.
Treatment T1, gave a low amount yield of 3.35 t/ha. So, the treatment T1
appears to produce the low output.
The study revealed that AWDI plot increased plant height, number of
effective tillers per hill, number of total tillers per hill, grain yield, straw
yield and biological yield and flooded plot decreased number of effective
tillers per hill, number of total tillers per hill, grain yield, straw yield and
biological yield. Considering all the outputs from the experiment, it can be
inferred that practicing treatment T6, would be the best choice for rice
cultivation in silty loam soil, here farmers can be suggested to irrigate their
lands.
5.2 Recommendation
Followings are some of' the specific points that have to he addressed in further
studies
The study on the effect of AWDI on rice production was done in small
experimental fields. Further studies may be conducted at farmers field for
the verification of the results.
In order to distinguish between the effects of active versus passive drainage,
schedule versus on demand flooding and AWDI on other agricultural
32
33
REFERENCES
Balasubramanian, R., Krishnarajan, J. and Ramesh, S. (2001). Economical use
of water for direct seeded rice. Rice Research of Food security and poverty
alleviation. Proceedings of the International Rice Research Conference, Los
Banos.
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) (2007). Achievements of
Non Commodity Technologies; Water saving in rice cultivation. Online
publication (http://www.bina.gov.bd) of BINA, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) (2004). Annual Progress Report of
2003-2004.
Posted
online
publication
(http://brri.gov.bd/research-
34
35
Organization
Seminar
on
Organizational
Change
for
Bangabandhu
Sheikh
Mujibur
Rahaman
Agricultural
36
37
38