Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For
The Site of The Proposed Waterford at Fairway Village Project
2911 S. E Village Loop
Vancouver, Washington 98683
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
(503) 678-5063
EMAIL: charles_a_spear@yahoo.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION............................................................................... 4-6
PUBIC RECORDS 8
DATABASES....................................................................................... 11-13
AIR POLLUTION 21
LIMITATIONS , 23
APPENDIX 2.0
SITE DATA
APPENDIX 3.0
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASES
APPENDIX 3.0
CONSULTANT RESUME
Bus: 503.678.5063
Cell 503.680.6398
Fax: 503.6785063
\!Jay 17,2010
EIS JOB No. 2010041
This report presents the results of an ASTM & AAI pmcedural Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment conducted at the above referenced environmentally non-problematic, undeveloped,
and partIally \-vooded parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of S.E,
164 1h Avenue and S. E. Village Loop in Vancouver, Washington. The environmental site
assessment was performed by Charles A. Spear, ASTM certified field representative of
Fll\ironmcnlal Inspection Servlces (EIS), on Tuesday, May 4,2010. No Recognized ConditJons
of El1\ironmcntal Impairment (ReEl) were observed on-site.
No Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC's) were noted at the subect property and
no additional environmental studies are recommended at the subject property at this time.
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of
En\'ironmental Professional as defined in 312.10 of this part (40 CFR Part 312)."
I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a
property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and
performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices
set forth in 40 CFR Part 312."
In OUl' Opll1l0n, based on a reVlew oCavailable site records; a review of previous environmentally
non-problematic site agricultural applications; an examillation of prepared environmental
database I-eports, current Phase I studies; and site reconnaissance data, the pOSSibilitIes of
chemical contam1l1ation of the subject property are minimal.
Page -1-
EnVironmental Site Assessments Environmental Audits/Inspections Underground Storage Tank Wetlands/Site Remediation AHERA Asbestos Surveys
No recognized conditions of current or historical environmental impainnent from chemical
hazZlrdous materials, substances, or waste releases, emissions, dumping, accumulations, or
dischargcs were noted for the subject property during the site inspection. No chemically
distressed vegetation or petroleum stall1ed salls were observed on-site. 0 active or inactive
regulated or non-regulated underground tanks were observed on-site. No related underground
storage tank appurtenances such as filll'isers, vent risers, fuel pumps, groundwater monitoring
wells, fuel pump canopies or fueling service bays were observed on-site.
1\0 Recogni7.ed Environmental Conditions (REC's) were observed at the subject property. No
non-scope REC's such as radon, vapor intrusion conditions, PCB's, wetlands, aquifer recharge
areas, geologIC hazard conditions, vapor intnlsion conditions, asbestos or lead-based paint
materials were observed on-site.
The envl)"onmental assessment also included an examination of City of Vancouver permits and
repons: o\\nershlp records: examination of property utilities and amenities. lnterviews With
kno\\leJge3ble IndiViduals, an examination of the subject property grounds areas: an all
appropriate review of avaIlable site records; and an assessment of other contiguous subject and
adjolJ1l11g propeJ1ies. The subject property, adjoining properties, site vicinity, and other site
details are shown by a series of plates, drawings, and aerial photographs in Appendix 1.0 of thIS
repOI1.
Sources of lt1formatlon were reviewed and activities were perfoll11ed in order to identify potential
sourCi.:S of regulated or hazardous materials at the subject property Such environmental laws and
regulations as the Comprehensive EnVironmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Sohd Waste
Disposal Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) were reviewed and applied to the
subject propeliy. Compliance with these regulations was established at the time of the site
inspection based on available data.
Page -2
The following reasonably attall1able and publically reviewable data was examined for the subject
property:
( I .()) Recorded cham of title documents (deeds, easements, leases, restrictions, and covenants);
(20) Aerial photographs reflecting prIor usage and which are reasonably obtall1able through state
or local governmental agencies;
(3.0) Determination of the existence of environmental cleanup liens against the property which
have arisen pursuant to federal, state, and local laws;
(40) Reasonably obtalllablc federal, state, or local governmental records of sites where there has
been a release of hazardous substances, and which are likely to cause or contribute to <1
release or threat of release on the property under examination;
(50) Interviews with persons familiar with the site and its history;
(()(J) A visual site inspection of tile property and the property immediately adjacent to It, to
determIne the obVIOusness of the presence or likely presence of a release or threat of
release of hazardous substances;
(7,0) A review of Previous EIS Phase I reports prepared for the general study area in 1998,
2()00. and 2003.
o specific hazardous material, substance, or waste environmental considerations were noted for
the subject property. If there are any questions feel free to contact us at (503) 678-5063.
Respectfully Submitted,
~}~A r---
Charles A. Spear, Partner
Page -3
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The American Society for Testmg & Materials has developed a standard practlce E 1527-2005
for the perlormance of envIronmental due dIlIgence services on property. The objective of the
gUIdance IS to synthesize and put into wnting good customary practice for environmental site
assessments; facilitate high quality, standardized environmental site assessments; ensure a
standard of appropriate inquiry; and to clarify an industry standard for appropriate inquiry in an
effon to guide legal Interpretation of CERC A's innocent landowner defense.
The purposes of thiS practice is to define good commercial and customary practice 1I1 the Unlted
States for condLlcting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercIal rCClI estate with
respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products.
The Emi ron menta I Protection Agency (EPA) has established standards for A II Appropriate
InquIry (AAJ). The rule was published in the Federal Register on November 1,2005 and became
effective on November 1,2006 The final rule establishes regulatory requirements for cOllCluctll1g
all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership, uses, and environmental conditions of a
property for the purposes of qualifying for certain landowner liability protections under
CERCLA
The pU!1'Josc of this Phase 1 Envirollmental Sile Assessment was to fulfill ellVlronmelllal study
reqUIrements for the purposes of establlshll1g due diligence and appropnate lI1ljUJry on the subject
property.
This report was perfoJl11ed in accordance with the practices and procedures outlined Il1 ASTM E
1527-2005 and Federal AAI standards. This work was accomplished in accordance with a written
service agreement bet'vveen Touchmark Development & Constnzction and Environmental
Inspectloll Services in May, 2010.
Page -4
limitations & Exceptions
No soil, groundwater, or building material samples were collected during the site reconnaissance.
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report was prepared in accordance with generally
accepted ASTM & AAI standards of environmental practice at the time this investigation was
performed EvaluatlOns of the conditIOns at the site for the purposes of this InvestigatIOn were
made from a limited number of observation points and may be subjective in some cases.
Environmental Inspection Services has prepared this report based on ll1fOrmatlon collected from
avaJlable records and files.
The scope of this environmental assessment IS limited and did not include groundwater sampling
01" analysis of sOils beneath the site. No environmental REC or non-scope REC conslderatlOns
\\ere noted on-site and no additional studies are recommended. The findings and conclusions arc
not to be regarded as scientific certaintIes. FlI1dings are based on professional judgement
concerl1lng data significance.
Methodology
No speCIal environmental conditions or concerns were noted on the subject properiy. The subject
property IS described as an undeveloped, 6.89 acre remnant of the original 1802 acre parcel of
land in Vancouver, Washington. The remaining twelve (12) acres are developed WIth a modern
1997-vintage assisted care facility.
The subject Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment scope of work included an examination of
publlcally available and reasonably ascertainable records such as documents from the US.
Em'irollmental Protection Agency (USEPA),the National Priority List (NPL); Resource
Conservation and Recovery Infotlllation System generators (RCRA); actIve and archIved
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCUS) listed sites; Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) cleanup site::., regulated
and non-regulated underground storage tank sites.
Additional records evaluated included databases collected from the Washington State FIre
Mar hal's Office to Include hazardous matenals usage infollllation sltes, HAZMAT lncldence
Lists, USDA pesticlde records and Department of Agriculture & Soil Conservation records.
AddltJOllal information examined included county and city Aerial Photographs, available
Sanborn fnsurance Maps, City Directories, U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps, and Title
company legal descriptions. No samples were collected from building materials, soil, or
groundv"alcr.
Page -5
The subject propeI1y was directly examined for conditions to include current sIte usage,
housekeepIng pl-actices, CY idences of chemical spills and pesticIde discharges~ evidences of
\'Isible surface contal11lnatlon~ eVIdences of underground storage tanks~ eVidences of leaks from
above ground tanks and other hazardous substance containers, No environmental spdlages were
noted in the area, No special environmental conditions of concern regarding chemical hazardous
substances or materials were noted for the subject property.
The enYIr(Jt1l11ental site assessment was performed by Charles A. Spear, ASTM certlJied field
representatl ve of Environmental Inspection Services (EIS), on Tuesday, May 4, 2010. The EIS
representative examined the entire subject property and no structural appurtenances were observed
on-site. The extreme southeast quadrant of the site is partially covered with trees. No other special
!'catmes were noted on-site.
The ubject parcel of land was examll1ed for recognized environmental conditIons of
ennronmentallll1paim1ent and no areas of subjective environmental impallluent from hazardous
waste or substances were noted on-site during the site inspection,
No speCial environmental conditions or concerns were noted on the subject property. The subject
property IS described as an undeveloped, 6.89 acre remnant parcel of land located at the northwest
corner orlhc IntersecLlon ofS,E. Village Loop and S.E. 1641h Avenue in the Fairway/164th
neighborhood or Vancouver Washington_
Reconncllssance of the subject property revealed no subjective evidence of regulated wastes, other
types of solId or liquid wastes, and/or fugitive hydrocarbons present. No chemical stained soil or
chel11Jcally distressed vegetation were observed on-site. No chemical or petroleum stock piles,
drums of chemicals, or other subjective evidence of petroleum stained soils were observed on-site.
!o rcpol1able quantities of hazardous substances, waste, or materials were observed on-site.
No drums or other large containers of waste hazardous chemicals were observed on-site. No
hazardous substances, materials or waste releases, emissions, discharges, spillages,
accumulations, outfalls, or stockpiling ,vere observed on-site. No disposal pits, hazardous waste
ponds or lagoons were observed on-site..
Page -6
No recognIzed conditions of environmental impairment from chemical hazardous matcnals,
substances, or waste releases, emissions, discharges, accumulations, or dumping were noted for
the subject property during the site inspection.
The subject property 1S not listed as a RCRA regulated generator of hazardous waste. The site was
not listed on v\'DOE sIte cleanup or assessment databases ,mel no CERCUS / SUPERFUND sites
\\,ere noted in the study area. The subject property is not listed as a RCRA regulated generator of
hazardous waste. The site was not listed on WDOE site cleanup or assessment databases and no
CERCUS / SUPERFUND sites were noted in the immediate study area.
1\0 records were discovered which indicated confirmed releases, discharges or emissions of
petroleum 01 othcl' regulated substances on-site. No contaminated soil stockpiles or groundwater
monitortng wells 'vvere noted on-Site InformatIon obtall1ed fi'om the Washll1gton Department 01"
Ecology (WDOE)and the Washington State Fire MarsballJlchcated tbat no disposal actiVIties or
episodes of release of contaminants have been reported on the subject property.
Page -7
PUBLIC RECORDS REVIEW
Reasonably attainable and publically reviewable public records pertaining to the use, storage,
spillage, or disposal of hazardous substances dated 2010 were researched for the subject and
adjoining properties. Records from the following agencies and organizations were exarntned:
Page -8
SITE DESCRIPTION I HISTORICAL USAGE
The subject pdrcel or land is described as an undeveioped, remnant.. 6.89 acre, corneL and fully
grass covered parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the mtersectlon of S, E, 1(Alii
Avenue and S,E. Village Loop In Vancouver, Washington,
A vvalkover of the subject parcel did not reveal subjective evidence of regulated or non regulated
underground or aboveground fuel storage tanks. No hazardous substances or waste releases,
emissions, discharges or spillages were observed on-site, No wetlands, aqUIfer recharge areas,
gcologlc hal.ard areas, scientifically significant wildlife habitats or related sensitive lands
conditions were observed on-site. No hazardous waste or substance spIllages or releases were
observed In the many nuisance pde areas.
ponion uf 12 I 93 70()() (lS9 acre remnant& undeveloped portion of the onginal IS,02 acres
The Clark County Assessor's Office has legally described the subject parcel as a portion of Tax
account No, 121937000 at the Northwest One-quarter of Section 1, Township 1 North, ~ange 2
East of the Willamette Meridian. The subject uneven, and grass covered parcel ofland is planned
for development. The subject parcel of land is described by a series of plates, drawings and
photographs Included In the appendices of this report.
Historical
The extreme southeast corner of the subject property was developed with a small farmhouse, The
fallllhouse is depicted in the 1955-1994 aerial photograph. The fannbouse does not appear in the
2()()7 acnal photograph, A walkover of this area of the subject property revealed several trees and
a grassy deprcssion area, The site appears to have been over-excavated and was cleared of all
recognizable Improvements,
Page -9
CURRENT ADJOINING PROPERTY USAGE
The subject property IS located withm a rapIdly developing previously agricultural area of
Vancouver, Washington located at the northwest comer of the intersection of S.E. Village Loop
and SE 164 1h Avenue in Vancouver, Washington. A shopping center is located directly south of
the subject property An Jctive SheJJs serVIce station is located further south and hydraulically
down gradient oCthe subject property No immediately up gradient servIce stations or drycleaners
were observed In the study area.
:'-/ORTH
ImmedIately northward propertIes include The Lexington House Assisted Care Facility and
cOlllmerclal developments abutting S.E. 164 1h Avenue;
SOUTH
Immediately southward properties include S.E. Village Loop, a restaurant, a retail shopping center
\\ Ith bus1l1esses to Include Now Dental, Blackstone American GrIll, Village Breads and Pastries, a
cllllorractors office, a drycleaners, Banner Bank, Scubs.s Spa, and an active and permitted Shell
service statIon,
IllllllcdI~l!ely cas!\\ ard propertIes lIlclude S E. 164 1h Avenue, Fishers Landlllg Towncenter, The
Cove at Fishers Landing residential development. The Heritage Green Residential SubdivisJOn.
an active and pellllltted Chevron service station, Jiffy Lube, and a McDonalds restaurant;
WEST
lmmediately \vestward propeI1ies include the Waterford Assisted Living Facility and Outpatlent
('Ilnic and numerous ('esidentlal developments.
Page -10
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SUBSTANCES, AND WASTE
H,uardous matenals, substances and vvaste are regulated by a basIc framework of federal
regulation provided by an Act known as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
RCRA controls the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste
through a comprehensive "cradle to grave" waste management tracking system. RCRA lS
administered natIonally by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with major
component of the la\\ to the states for ongoll1g implementation. Such solid wastes as domestic
sewage. household wastes, industrial wastewater discharges, and agriculturally derived solid
wastes are exempt from regulatIon.
The subject propetiy is not listed as a registered Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) ha7.ardous waste generator and is not subject to the United States Environmental
protection Agency (EPA) identification numbering system. No EPA or Washington Department
of Ecology, (WOOEL complaInts or violations were filed and no evidence of spi 11<..t§!c or discharge
of hazardous wastes or substances were noted at the subject property
The subject property was examined for subjective evidence of hazardous waste generation,
spillage, or releases and no such evidence was noted. There was no physical evidence of illicit
drug manufacturing on-site. A review of regional l1azardous waste generator records revealed no
on-site C\ lucnce of hazardous waste generation.
The subjcct property has not been listed on such hazardous waste reports as Washingtoll
Department of Ecology SARA Title III facilities lISts, WOOE Leaking Underground ~;lora!'!L: Tank
Lists. WOOE suspected Hazardous Waste SIte ListS, and the IRC Known and Suspected
Hazardous Waste Site Listings.
The WOOE Toxics Cleanup Program develops an updated report called the Affecte(l Vledia and
Contaminants Report. The WOOE will conduct additional investigations and wi]] add a site to thiS
report after leaming ofa potentially contamll1ated sIte. The site IS not listed in thiS report The
WOOE has developed a 20 I0 statewIde Confirmed and Suspected Contamll1ated site property \VIII
appear on the database. No CSCSL sites were noted on-site or wIthin a one-halfmIie radiUS.
The subject property is not listed on the EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Llabilily, und Compensation System (CERCUS) list of potential hazardous waste sites under
"SLPERFUNO" (CERCLA) The two listed CERCUS listed sites are listed for the entire area
and do not apply to the subject property or one mile study area. The subject property and
Immediately adjacent propertIes are not listed on the National Prionty LISt.
Page -11
The subject propetiy is not listed on the EPA National Priority list (NPL), CERCLA
(Comprehensive Envirorunental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCUS): The ReSClllrCe Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRA-TSD); The
RCRtl. Adl11inistrati\c Action Tracking System (RAATS); the Resource ConservatIon and
Reco\ery Information System (CORRACTS): The Emergency Response Notificatlon System
(ERNS): The PCB Activity Database System (PADS); The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI); the
Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS); The Civil Enforcement Docket (DOCKET); and the
Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory (TSCA). No hazardous waste generation threats to the
subject property were noted.
In our opll110n. there are no NPL conSIderations for the subject property at thlS time A region 10
CERCUS list \\as reviewed for the purposes of thiS report and no nearby CERCUS sites were
lIsted.
Page -12
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
The Washington State legislature has determll1ed that leakll1g underground storage tanks (UST's)
containing petroleum and other regulated substances pose a serious threat to human health and the
ell\·lronmenL. Tn response to thls concem, the legislature has intended for the Washington
D 'partment of Ecology (WDOE) to establIsh an ullderground storage tank program. This
program IS designed, operated, and enforced in a manner that, at a mil1lmum, meets the
requirements for delegation of the federal UST program of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976.
The subject property was inspected for the presence of underground fuel storage tanks (USTs) and
no regulated or non-regulated underground or aboveground fuel storage tanks or related tank
appurtenances \\-ere observed on-Slte. No fuel pumps, vent or fi II risers, drive slabs or fuel
canopies \"ere observed on-slte.
Page -13
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
HYDROGEOLOGY
The subject property improvements shall be connected to City of Vancouver munICIpal \vater
sen ice. No active drinking water or irrigation water wells are located on the subject property.
Site surface waters are not directly utilized as a water supply.
The subject plOjJerly IS localed WIthin the Salmon Creek watershed. A walkover of the subject
property dId not reveal any eVidence of rivers, streams or creeks on the subject property.
Groundvvater elevations are moderate in some areas on-site. The subject property IS located
greater than one mile nOl1h of the Columbia River and the generalized direction of groundwater
flow IS southward to\vards the Columbia River.
A gcotechnlc31 study of the infiltration rate and groundwater elevation throughout the general site
area \\ as completed by Deep RIver Geotechnical on August 17-19, 1999 Deep River
Geotechnical Sen'lces conducted a comprehensive geotechnical analYSIS of the general study area.
The report considered the groundwater characteristics of the site. Eleven test PitS were analyzed
and nilleteen infiltration tests were perfonned by the geotechmcal company. The test results
indicated as follow: "groundwater was found in six of the eleven test pits, as high as ~ feet below
the surface in T-4. 9-feet deep in T-8, and 10-11 feet deep ill T-6B, T7, T9, and T1 O.
Thc lkpths descllbcd were not COllsl(.Iered to be shallow and Indicated thal the project area Sinon
Center pl"OJects comply With applicable Clark Counly standards". It IS not 8ntIcipated that the
subject proposal would create pollution of groundw8ter somces.
Tht' I1lclJor aqui fer of the subject property is the Upper Troutdale Formation at a depth of
approximately 150 to 200 feet. The aquder is comprised of bedded layers of gravel and sand
t)'pical of sandy river mudstone. The aquifer is unconfirmed, it is considered a shallow drinkIng
water somce, and it IS conSIdered a highly vulnerable water source. Known aqUIfer contamll1,lllts
rnclude nitrates, chlorides, coliform, petroleum products, heavy metals. The problems [acing the
aquifer are aSSOCiated With rapid urbanization.
Additional aquifer problems are caused by such causes as decreased recharge, industrial activities,
on-site sewage aclivitles ll1 the county, agricultural waste, urban runoff, underground storage
tanks, etc. The USGS has a study 111 pl"Ogl"ess whIch has established a groundwater manZlgemcnt
agency for lhlS sole-source Zlquifer. The subject property has not affected ground'vvater quaiJty
based on-site observations and available data and resources.
Page -14
SENSITIVE LANDS
Clark County ordinances have been established for environmentally sensitive lands in Clark
County in order to preserve, protect, and enhance environmentally sensitive areas. Such areas as
\\ etlands. streams. geologic hazard areas. aquifer recharge areas, critical wildlife habitats, and
!lood potential areas qualify as environmentally sensitive areas. Wetlands are generally defined as
those areas that arc Inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration
sufficient to support, and that under normal cIrcumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
\:0 obvious wetlands, saturated soils, hydrophytic vegetation or other hydric conditions were
110ted on the subject properly .A GIS map summary prepared for the parent 18 acre development
application indicates no slope stability Indicators; no wildland mapping II1dlcators; no priority
habitat areas; no geologIc hazard areas; and no pnol'lty specIes areas. A review o!'Sensitlve Lands
Maps for Clark County did not reveal hIgh quality wetlands mapped on-site.
The subject propeliy is not listed as a critical land and is mapped on the Clark County
illtcllll'Ctatl\ e map for CCC13.50 Critical Clearing Ordinance. The removal of trees on-site may
require compliLlllce \\Ith the Vancouver Vegetation Clearing Ordinance. The EnVironmentally
Sensitl\e Areas Map lists such conditions as wetlands, potentially unstable slopes, shoreline
management areas and 100-year flood plain areas as designated under the State EnVIronmental
Policy Act (SEPA) Rules, Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code.
The site is 110t located within a 100 or 500 year designated flood plain area acc0rdmg to FIRM
maps. The site IS located within a zone C area of minimal flooding according to Panel 319 of 475
of FIRM Community Panel No. 530024-0319(' dated May 2,1991.
NUISANCES
Clark County Ordll1(111Ce No. 1991-11-09 related to nuisances and litter control has been developed
lor the purposes orcontrolling nuiSclllce hazarcls. There are no noteworthy conditIons on the
subject property in the !'l,rllls 01' garbage, trash. and Junk piles No hazardous W,1ste was ohselTed
in the surface areas oftbe nuisance piles. MIllor nuisance condItions lllcludc substantlalnoxlous
vegetation on-sIte. Nuisance vegetation on the subject propeliy will require abatement In
accordance with the nuisance abatement provisions of Clark County Nuisance Ordinances.
Page -15
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Clark County utilizes a sod descriptlon methodology established by the USDA Soil Conservatlon
Service (SCS), which describes 111 detail various soil types. The SCS informZltIon also detaIls the
type of physical constrall1ts associated with each soil type.
The SCS has deternlined that Clark County soils have been classified into eight major soil
,!ssoclations. The subject property is comprised of soils of one of these associations. The U.S
Soil ConscnLlllon Service has classl(Jcd Sile soils as SOils of the Lauren-Sifton-Wind River
AssoclatJon. These soils arc generally described as somewhat excessIvely drZll[1cd. domll1antly
nearly level to gently sloping, gravelly, medium-textured and moderately coarse textured soIls of
the ten'aces of the Columbia River in southwestern Clark County.
Sitc specIfic soils have been classified by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Lauren gravelly
loam. (J to 8 percent slopes (LgB). The surface runoff IS slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight.
The d\aiLlble water capZlcity IS moderate and the soil is somewhat excessively drained. Sitc soils
have not been significantly altered by site construction.
Page -16
NON POINT SOURCE POLLUTION
J\onpoint source (NPS) pollution is pollution originating from a large number of sources WhlCh
indi\idually contribute relatively little pollution, but which collectively create significant pollution
prohlems. In vie'vv of current site conditlOns the NPS considerations for the subject property are
urban runoff. Urban runoff IS described as the surface flushing of such as suspended solids,
nutrients, pathogens, and tOXICS from surface accumulations. The typical consequence of thiS
redirection of precipitation is flood mg, stream bed scouring, erOSIon, sedIment deposition, and
contaminant migration.
Septic Tanks
Tn our opinion, the subject property may be considered a typical residential contributor to regIonal
urh(\llrUnoffconcerns There was no on-site evidence of pollutant nmoffinto local storm sewers
noted during lhe Slle ITconnalssance Clark Coullty does require an on-going construction
management plan for proposed construction actiVities tn order to control and prevent erosion and
sediment run-ofras a mitigative condition ofSEPA. No significant sediment or silt
accumulations or generation sources were observed on-site. Any proposed construction plan
must have engineered designs such as enhanced erosion and sediment control methods in order to
cleanse and I-emove contaminants via biofiltration or other suitable treatment processes.
A proper erosion and sediment control practice must be used on tbe construction site and adjacent
areas 111 order to prevent upland sediments from entering material Stormwater drainage systems
Best Management Practices relati ve to erosion contro I and Stonnwater management wtll be
reqUired throughout the course of the subject development. All disturbed areas or those altered
by construction should be seeded, riprapped, or given some other equivalent type of erosion
protection. RUlloff generated from the subject development must be treated prior to its discharge
into groundwater [[there are any questions related to eroSJOn control contact Loree Randall of
the yVOOE at (2()()) 586-5553.
All construction actiVities planned for the subject property should be planned and implemented III
a manner consistent with standard Best Management Practices (BMP's) for site development.
BMP's are defined as those practices that include methods to prevent toxic and hazardolls
sllbstJIlCeS and other pollutants from reaching receiving waters. BMP's are designed to control site
construction practices and must be Integrated Into the developed site-specific Storm Water
Erosion Control Plall (ECP) The development and implementation of BMP's pursuant to erosion
and Stormwater management is required throughout the course of the proposed development on
site.
Page -17
Considerations in selecting a BMP include efficiency vs. flow vojul11e~ initial and Ii fe cycles costs;
and pollutants involved. BMP's are instrumental when developing the erosion Control Plan (ECP)
which i' required pursuant to applicatloll for a National Pollutant Discharge ElImInation (NPDES)
General St01l11 water Discharge permit.
The NPDES program was established by federal regulation as a component of the Clean Water
Act in order to improve the quality of storm water from construction activities, industries, or
industrial type activitics. BMP's may Illclude any or all of such controls as vegetation
prescnatlon; \'cgctativc cover reestablishmcnt:, ulll17L1tlon of erosion control blankets and
geotexti les; compost covenng~ Jute nettll1g, diversion ditching. application of hydraulic mulch.,
landscaping, sedIment traps, straw mulch, perimeter dikes, plastIC sheetIng, or outlet protectIOn.
Construction activities often contaminate storm and sewer surface water,
Grading actIvities remove grass, rock pavement and other protective ground cover resulting in an
(xposme ol'underlylng soil. Sediment<:ltlon can choke surface water bodies and kill fish and
plants. The Federal statute and regulations require a National Pollutant Discharge EllmlDatlon
System (NPDES) pe11l1it for construction activities on-site. An NPDES Permit # 1200-(' IS
required for land clearing activities planned on-site. The l200-C permit requires erosion and
sediment control at the construction site. The WDOE is responsible for issuing the 1200-C permit.
Federal La'\ requIres contractol's to obtall1 a NPDES permit # 1700-.1 for any proposed dIscharge
of wash waters Into surface waters or storm drams or ground. A Land-Use CompatlbJiity
Statement is reqUired for application of the 1700-J pemlit app1Jcation. The NPDES permit # 1700
J must be obtained [rom the WDOE prior to the cleaning tools, containers, vehicles, equipment,
and buildings.
A pre-('Ippro\'(~d EI'oslon Control Plan IS reqUired prior to site development for the purposes of
minimiZing Cl'OSlon of disturbed land during clearing, excavation, gradlllg, construction, and post
construction actl vities, Effeeti ve January I, 200 t, Clark County requ ires proof of erosion control
certification before initiating construction activities. The proposed construction plan must have
sufficient engineered designs to cleanse and remove contaminants via biofiltration or other
suitable treatment processes in accordance with the Stom1water contr01 ordinance requirements.
A pl'Oper erosion and sediment control practice must be used on the constr-uctlOn Site and adjacent
areas in order to prevent upland sedIments from enterIng the on-site and nearby matenal
Stormw<:lter dralllage systems. All disturbed areas or those altered by constructIOn should be
eeded, riprapped, or given some other equivalent type of erosion protection. If there are any
questions related to erosion control contact Igor Vern of the WDOE at (360) 407-0281.
Page -18
Ecoiogy's Stonll'vvater permit for construction activities is required by federal regulatIons (40CFR,
parts 122, 123, and 124 Subcbapter D). The objective of the permit is to reduce or eliminate
Storm\\ater pollution and other impacts from construction sites. Clearing, grading, or excavating
11\ (' or more acres of land and activities which will discharge Stormwater from the site into
surl~lce \\alCrs will n:quire preparation and submittal of Ecology's General pennit to Discharge
The developer may contact the WDOE at Water Quality Program, Stoffi1water Unit, P.O. Box
47696, Olympia, Washington 98504-7696. Loree Randall may be reached at (360) 407-6294 for
Sl0ll11water information. The permit requires the implementation, monitoring, and maintenance of
a Storm\\ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP is essentially a temporary erosion
and sediment control (ESC) plan Implemented throughout the entire course of the developmClll.
The primary objectives of the Erosion and sediment control plan is to direct and plan the
The ESC should prevent violations of surface and ground water quality and sediment management
standards
sed I mentation;
-\11 BMP's sh,i1! he II1spectec!' m<1l11tained. and repaired All on-site erosion and sediment
control measures must be Inspected every seven days and within 24-hoLlrs after any slorm
Page -19
ASBESTOS I LEAD-BASED PAINT I RADON
ASBESTOS I LEAD
No asbestos material or lead-based paint material concerns were noted for the subject property.
The environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been concerned with the disease-causing
pot ntial of non-industrial exposure to asbestos since the early 1970's. There is epidemiologic
evidence llni<lng airborne asbestos exposure by asbestos workers to vanous types of cancer and
nonmalignant respiratory diseases, and from recognition that large quantities of asbestos have
been found in building materials, insulation, and other products used in schools and other
bUlldings.
RADON
The subject property is located within a low radon potential area. A total of three (3) sites were
tested for the presence of radon. An average radon measurement of 2.4pCi/L was detected. No
radon concerns were noted for the site.
SEPA
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires the City of Woodland Responsible Official,
to determine potential environmental effects of a proposed land use change to decide if a given
change will have a significant effect. If the Responsible Official decides that a given change \-vill
cause significant effects based on environmental document review, the applicant must prepare an
environmental impact study or comply with mitigative requirements and conditions. Pursuant to
(SEPA) Rules Chapter 197-11, Washington Administrative Code, a SEPA Checklist will be
requIred by WAC 197-11-340(2) for any substantial site development.
A SEPA checklist has been prepared and a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was issued
for the greater study area.
Page -20
AIR POLLUTION
Air pollution control in Washington State is a coordinated effort by the Department of Ecology
(DO ) and nllle single or multi-county air pollution control authorities. It is the major goals of
the Washlllgton AIr Pollution Control Program to establish control measures~ attain and maintain
federal and state aIr quality compliance; initiate area wide attainment programs; provide an air
momtoring program; and operate a statewide state and federal air quality program.
The Southwest Washington sector of the Portland-Southwest Washington Interstate Air Quality
Control Region which includes Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Skamania, Wahkiakum counties are served
by Lhe Southwest Washington Clean Air Control Authority (SWCACA). This authority was
established in 1968. Air quality in Clark County is monitored by SWCACA. SWCACA provides
control and prevention of air pollution related to new source activity.
The urban area of Clark County has been designated a non-attainment area for photochemical
oxidants (OX) and Total Suspended Particulates (TSP). High TSP readings are typical of the
lIldustrial section of Vancouver. Carbon Monoxide levels are elevated on such nearby highways as
Highway 205 and Interstate 5 during peak commuter rush hours. Pollutants on such highways are
generally diffused quickly to below action limits.
The Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) air toxics program began in 1984 with the
development of an air toxics inventory. According to an 1984 air pollution source inventory
approximately 45,000 tons of 92 different toxic air pollutants were emitted from both industrial
and area wide sources such as motor vehicles, woodstoves, and drycleaners.
In our opil11on, there are no air pollution problems directly attributable to the subject property.
Regional non-attainment with air toxic emission standards is attributed to other commercial and
industrial applications in Vancouver and Portland. The subject vacant, vegetated parcels are not
considered to be a contributor to local air pollution.
Two minor air polluters, Highway 14 and N.E. l62nd are located near the subject property. High
levels of motor vehicle traffic on these roadways produces episodes of higher carbon monoxide,
photo chemical oxidants (OX) and Total Suspended Particulates (TSP). However it is not llkely
that such episodes have enviromnentally impaired the subject property.
No haze or suspended particulates were observed in the area of the site at the time of the
environmental assessment. However, if speci ftC assurances are needed regarding such air
contaminants as suspended particulates, particle size, Coefficient of Haze, sulfur dioxide ozone or
carbon monoxide then specific instrumental analysis is necessary. In our opinion, no such
analysis is recommended. For additional air-quality information contact the Washington
Department of Ecology Air Programs at 206-459-6240.
Page -21
RISK ASSESSMENT / RECOMMENDATIONS
In our optnion, potential rLsks associated with considerations such as chemIcal contamination,
non-point source pollution, hazardous waste pollution, underground storage tanks, and PCBs at
the subject property are minimal. The potential risks associated with sub-surface soil
contamination migrating from off-site industrial, residential and commercial low-risk sources is
lllilllmal based on available environmental records & enforcement actions.
Best Management Practices and implementation and utilization of Best Management ConstructIon
Practices during the entire course of any constnlcti on project is recommended. Vegetati ve
stabilization/filtration, sediment traps, diversions bales, filter fences, or other protective
procedures consistent with the procedures outlined in the erosion/sediment control plan should be
followed to avoid property damage at the subject and adjoining properties. Drainage plans,
Stonnwater Treatment and erosion control plans, and mitigative requirements of SEPA and the
Clark County Hearings Examiners must be incorporated into the development to prevent potential
losses and damages. All mitigative measures stated in order to avoid injuries, losses and damages.
Clark County ordinance No. 1991-11-09 related to nuisances and litter control has been developed
for the purposes of controlling nuisance hazards. No junk, tash or garbage accumulations were
observed on-site. No hazardous waste was observed on-site.
Page -22
LIMITATIONS
Thls report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted ASTM standards of
environmental practice at the time this investigation was perfonned. Evaluations of the
conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a limited number of
observation points and may be subjective in some cases. The client is solely responsible for
provldmg any notIces or disclosures to concerned publtc agencies or to the public.
Environmental Inspection Services has prepared this report based on information collected from
available records and files. The scope of this investigation is limited and did not include
subsurface exploration or chemical screening of soil and groundwater beneath the site. This report
is not a substitute for a formal vvetlands delineation. No samples were collected for analysis of
suspect asbestos containing building materials. The findings and conclusions are not to be
regarded as scientific certainties. Findings are based on professional judgement conceming data
significance. No subsurface magnetometer examination were conducted within the scope of this
report. This report is an expression of professional opinion and is not a warranty express or
Imp lied.
Page -23
APPENDIX 1.0
PLATES
NW 1/4 of Section 01 TIR2E WM
-~-'~-'-"i_
(Scale 1:2810.6)
100
.. 0 100 200
~1_~-_~-~~~~~iiiiiiiiiii~~~i
300 400 Feet
SITE
PLATE
GENERALIZED SITE MAP P-l
PROJECT NQ. 2010041
-
I ••
.2 3'
. ~
77
" 1211131
MCGILLlVRA Y
'18
"
/ .,10",,11,1
Ulac.
4,11,18.22,30-.34,
IzM,1B-4Q
••
1211ZIJ
I.
U11:Ii3
SITE
PLATE
SITE ASSESSORS MAP
P-2
PROJECT NQ. 2010041
Stadium
:: 22
."
21 0
;:'1 c:.
('I
C"
,OJ
" - ;
- - ::1)
13 '"(")
181h
."' ST z
I
'" 16 17 ('I
HE-8 T H W17
17 ~ ~ 17 ! 16th
il ~CIR
:': l~lh
16th
'0 " ro
16" -
l~ CIIl "
CIA
:2 u c,
ST
ST M
N
15
,', ..
N
.- 14
15
" "'
CIR .. 13 CIA
"'..." ~~ 13
i ".
13(; 12th WAY
"
COR
>
CIR
~:::;
..
lZ ST
12th 5T 11th ,
:~ 11TH :sr
11 "'~ 11 11th ~ 191 h
elf' J...~ w«
- 10th '0 ,~
:; 10 rv 9th
• ST COR
91~ .iI.
~ PIlIEBRC'Q' 8th o' St
....., .,,:~'i- 8tb ~
t ',,:,'.1', 8th
• &PL
"
f:.>
8 : ·.... Ulr 7 WAY
-:t ...,~ ~ UJ
>
8 th
«
o
, Pl - ,r c. ~ NE
~ - }ttl
M
th C."
-1.'" '2.
5th
.e.th+_
4th 4th WAY 'c ~lh__
CIR
4th " .ol,~ •
c
£:. 3rd N 3rd
N ~ 3CIR ZClR
.
1 NE]rd ;;
L!'.I :!nrl ST ; 0:..
C>
~ 2nd "' w 25T
~ J:J£ 2nd ~ 1 <;111 ~ ICI/l
"' 1 t 1"1 CIA >
<! SE
- SEls.t 2 1st
ro
~ 2nd £:. 2nd
3rd 3rd _ ;
3Id (j)
Sf 4th
G ID" 4th ~
"
SE 5th ST
0\-- ......
7th ~u~u
"~u....
SE
..:;
:::
;; 10th
17 rry
_____ST
;:1.:llb
15th
"'
01
171h
'-'GE
R
27 _-1
2a t ,;i
,~ Wi'
~6
CIR '
"'
~
coC' J.'l
PLATE
SITE VICINITY MAP
P-3
PROJECTNQ . 2001041
UNITED STATES MOUNT TABOR QUADRANGLE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OREGON -WASHINGTON
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
E £F~:;PEEII MIL. L F SE 4 00RTLA ND I>
~ ~ -- ----;,\ c',
'I
• EI~OPI1JL GARDENS
====']..\:;'N:,';£=,;9~T~H~=====S=TR=£=£=T= ==
..
0
V'
r
'I
~
·
· ... ~ ~
~
N ~
L L P L A
··· ...
" ..
..... .
: ..... ~lilr1'1:"
0 ••
,.;,.j
•.... •;;r;;::::, - -,U,
,. •
..
llJ 0 MILL
II L~/N
,...
T £T
~
\I
\I
II
•• , .4 .. '
\I
\I
II
\I
\I
o
16TH
.... o
}"~J-••5:.
.~
...
- .." '
-'
.i
011
••••. J.\1__
---..-
---.. ....
I '''0
".
• 0
-......
-
...... "' .....
.... '"
5•
SITE s
~ONTOU INTEPVAL 10 FEET
PLATE
SITE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP P-4
PROJECT NQ. 2010041
SITE s
PLATE
1955 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
P-5
201041
NW 1/4 of Section 01 T1 R2E WM
SITE
PLATE
1964 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH P-6
PROJECTNQ. 2010041
NW 1/4 of Section 01 TlR2E WM
SITE
PLATE
1984 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
P-7
PROJECTNQ. 2010041
NW 1/4 of Section 01 TlR2E WM
SITE
PLATE
1994 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH P-8
PROJECT NQ. 2010041
NW 1/4 of Section 01 TIR2E WM
SITE
PLATE
2007 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH P-9
PROJECTNQ. 2010041
APPENDIX 2.0
SITE DATA
Parcel Information
Pa~el #: 121937000
Site Address: 2911 SE VILLAGE LP
Land Use 81 - RETIREMENT RESIDENCES & ALF'S (ASST LIVING FACILIT Zoning: R-30 - R-30
Improvement
Year Built.: 1997 Build Type: A - COMM - AVERAGE Bldg Use: -
Stories: Bedrooms: 6 Total Rooms:
Fin/UnFin:
Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and It's customers mak.e no representations, warranties or condItions, express or ImplIed, as to the accuracy or completeness of Information contaIned In this report.
General Information
Serial Number 121937-000
Situs Address: 2911 SE VILLAGE LP, VANCOUVER, 98683
Owner WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLAGE
Buyer
In Care Of
Mail Name· WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLAGE
Mail Address 5150 SW GRIFFITH DR, BEAVERTON, OR, 97005
Sale Year 2002
Sale Amt $0
1st Line Legal #40 A FISHER DLC #26 #17B SEC 1-1-2E AKA LOT 3 SP2-844 18.02
Prop Desc: Retirement residences & ALFs (Assisted Living Facilities)
Owner Type: Private Ownership
Assr Zoning R-30
Assr Complan: UH
Seg Date 951207
Comb Date 001106
Building Information
Units o
Bldg Sq Ft o
Land Information
Assr Acres: 18.02
Lot Sq Ft 0
Unirnp Value $0
Unirnp Acres 0
Special Assessment
'~NOTE~'
CI.~k County, WA
Beaverton, OR 97005
._- - - -- --- - - --
Reference No ..
Grantor(s): Colleen T_ Nistler and Werner G Nistler, Jr., Co-Trustees of the Colleen T Nistler and Werner G. Nistler,
THE GRANTORS, Colleen T. Nistler and Werner G, Nistler, Jr., Co~Trustees of the
Colleen T. Nistler and Werner G. Nistler, Jr. Family Trust VIAID September 3, 1992, as to
an undivided 37.037% interest for and in consideration of Ten and NollOO Dollars
($10,00) and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Waterford at Fairway Village, an
Oregon limited liability company, as Grantee, the following described real estate situate in
the County of Clark, State of Washington:
Lot 3 of Short Plat, recorded in Book 2, Page 844, under Auditor's File
No. 9401130442, records of Clark County, Washington, being a portion of
the Northeast quarter of Section l, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of the
Willamette Meridian, Clark County, Washington.
~ ~m!<2
A~/J.~
Werner G, Nistler, Jr., Co-Trustee of the Colleen T. Nistler
and Werner G. Nistler, Jr. Family Trust U/AID September 3,
1992
we fVnlstlerdeed. doc
\\"\1\"I" I~" \~\ ~ "'IIIII\"1)\\III"11\J\j\\ f~~;~~~
CLRRK COUNTY TITLE
4. .
STATE OF OREGON )
) ss
County of ~'~8tr)(l )
I certifY that Colleen T. Nistler appeared personally before me and that I know or
have satisfactory evidence that he signed this instrument, an oath stated that he was
authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a Co-Trustee of the Colleen T.
Nistler and Werner G. Nistler, Jf. Family Trust U/AfD September 3, 1992, to be the free
and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
" Given under my hand and official seal this Cf1h day of ()d, bfy- 2000.
rJ
~
OFFICIAL SEAL
~
~ " CARRIE M. WOOD Notary Public
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Residing at tJa5h/~tlYJ ({)U/\T::!j
-. COMMISSION NO 334515
~~OMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 15, 2004 My commission expir: S 1/ S J oY
STATE OF OREGON )
) ss
County of [JaSh;C6W/l )
I certifY that Werner G. Nistler, Jr. appeared personally before me and that I know or
have satisfactory evidence that he signed this instrument, an oath stated that he was
authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a Co-Trustee of the Colleen T.
Nistler and Werner G. Nistler, Jf. Family Trust VI AID September 3, 1992, to be the free
and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Given under my hand and official seal this Crth day of OdobeY ,2000.
Guufl1JaL
Notary Public I I
Residing at uJ()gW~~(OfW
My commission expires: ~it/
waf\llIstlerdeed.doc
11'WJJI~111111~mllllll~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII"1 ~~~~~~L"
for and in consideration of Nine Hundred Thousand and nol100 Dollars ($900,000.00) as
paid by an accommodator pursuant to an IRC Section 1031 exchange.
,n hand paid, conveys and warrants to Waterford at Fair.'Vay Village LLC, an Oregon limited
Iiabi Iit,. company, an und ,vided 17.963 % interest; and to Emerson J. Coil ier, Co-Trustee and
Frances J. Collier, Co-Trustee of the Emerson J. Collier Revocable Living Trust U/A/D July 13,
199B, as to an undivided 27%; and to Emerson J. Collier, Co-Trustee and Frances). Collier,
Co-Trustee of the Frances j. Collier Revocable Living Trust U/A/D July 13, 1998, as to an
undivided 18% interest; and to Werner G. Nistler, Jr., Co-Trustee and Colleen T. Nistler, Co
Trustee, of the Collen T. Nistler and Werner G. ,,",stier, Jr. Family Trust U/A//D
Sept. 3, 1992, as to an undivided 37.037% interest, all as tenants in common.
the following described real estate, situated in the County of Clark, State of Washington,
Lot 3 of Short Plat, recorded in Book 2, pageW under Auditor's File No. 9401130442,
records of Clark County Washington, being a portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 1,
Township 1 ,,"orth, Range 2 East of the Willamette Meridian, Clark County, Washington.
~ -----?<.. 7>'~:r-"~
~aribel~stee
«<.e.
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111
CHICRGO TITLE INSURRNCE CO 0 Ii 00
~~·:~~~:21~
Clar' County, ~R
State or Oregon
55.
County of YJnl,'lill
On thIs 4th day of February, 1999 before me, the undersigned, Lorali R. Sinnen, a I'.'olary Public in and (or the State
of Oregon, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appear~d Maribelh Hampton and Bruce Longstroth (Q me
known 10 be the Board Trustee and Board Trustee, respedfully, of Nonhwest Yearly Meeting of Friends, the
corporation thaI executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said corporatIon, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oalh staled that they
are authorized !O p.xecule the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WitnElss y hand and o(,(.iCI~1 seal hereto afiixed ihe day and year first above wrlHen.
,., @L) K c2-/l/li./;~
Notary Public in and (or the State of Oregon
OFFICIAL SEAL
Residing at Portland
LORALI R. SINNEN
NOTARY PUBUC·OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 307990
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 3D, 2002
3264342
C~RK
11111111 11111111 111111 Pale:
COUNTV TITLE 0 g,00
1 of 2
10/31/2000 02:44P
Clarx Cou~ty. ~~
- . - " -.
THE GRANTORS, Frances J. Collier and Emerson J. Collier, Co-Trustees of the Emerson
J. Collier Revocable Living Trust U/AfD July 13, 1998, as to an undivided 27% interest;
and Frances J. Collier and Emerson J. Collier, Co-Trustees of the Frances J. Collier
Revocable Living Trust U/AfD July 13, 1998 as to an undivided 18% interest, as tenants in
common, for and in consideration of Ten and No/ 100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, in hand paid,
conveys and warrants to Waterford at Fairway Village, an Oregon limited liability
company, as Grantee, the following described real estate situate in the County of Clark,
State of Washington:
Lot 3 of Short Plat, recorded in Book 2, Page 844, under Auditor's File
No. 9401130442, records of Clark County, Washington, being a portion
of the Northeast quarter of Section I, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of
the Willamette Meridian, Clark County, Washington.
i£- .z1'--:,
,,/1' c./ '"<:...,./
Frances J. Collie~o-Trustee of the Emerson J.
/)
j- I
\~
~
/ . .:
" ./
wafvcoUierdeed.doc
3264342
Page: 2 of 2
\\lI\\\l\\11 III" 111\ 1111111
CL.RRK COUNTY TITLE 0
III\Ijl II.
10/31/2000 02:44P
Clark County, WR
~
~--~~~">~ e~
~son J. Collier, Co-Trustee the Frances J.
Collier Revocable Living Trust lAID July 13, 1998
STATE OF OREGON
ss
County of Yamhill
--~=-'=-'''-=-
I certifY that Frances J. Collier appeared personally before me and that I know or
have satisfactory evidence that she signed this instrument, an oath stated that she was
authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a Co-Trustee of the Emerson
1. Collier Revocable Living Trust UlAID July 13, 1998, and as a Co-Trustee of the Frances
1. Collier Revocable Living Trust UlND July 13, 1998, to be the free and voluntary act of
such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Given under my hand and official seal this ---"----'-'-'-_ day of---=-.:....:::...=..::.....=..::....._ _, 2000,
OFFICIAL SEAL
SH~lEY A SONDENAA
NOTARY PU6UC·OREGON
COMMISSION ~O. 313186 Notary Public
lAY COIo4l.lISSION EXPIRES JUN 21. 2002 Residing at cMinnville
My commission expires 06-21-2002
STATE OF OREGON
ss
County of _~Y"",am",,-h
......l.·....1....1 "'-_
I certify that Emerson J. Collier appeared personally before me and that I know or
have satisfactory evidence that he signed this instrument, an oath stated that he was
authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a Co-Trustee of the Emerson
J. Collier Revocable Living Trust U/AID July 13,1998, and as a Co-Trustee of the Frances
J. Collier Revocable Living Trust U/AID July t3, 1998, to be the free and voluntary act of
such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
wafvcollierdeed.doc
PIC: Home Page Pagelof2
Land Records
Clark County Property Inforrl'dL
Property Info Center
Account Summary
GIS MapsOnline
Account No: 121937000
Subdivision Browser Property Type: Real
Quarter Sections Property Status: Active Tax Status: Regular
Auditor Records Site Address: 2911 SE VILLAGE LP, VANCOUVER, 98683
Abbreviated Legal Description: #40 A FISHER DLC #26 #17B SEC 1-1-2E AKA LC
Demographics
I Account _I Building Documents Environmental Permits Sale Search Tax,
Economic Handbook
Property Owner Owner Mailing Address Prope
Census 2000 Profiles
WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLAGE 5150 SW GRIFFITH DR 2911 :
Census Quick Facts BEAVERTON OR, 97005 98683
Google
Bing r~i
GIS Programs
Administrative Data Info Land Data Asse
Index of Atlas Maps
Zoning Designation ~ocJe2c" R-30 Clark County EQ.<;J(t8tIQ~ page 10 2009
GIS Metadata Zoning Overlay(s) none Approximate Area ill~. 784,951 sq. ft.
Comprehensive Plan UH 18.02 acres
Mark
GIS Training
[ND Subdivision N.W. YEARLY 2009
Annexation Tracker
Compo Plan Overlay MTG. OF FRIEN Land \
none
(s) Survey 039138 Bulldir
Storefront Census Tract 413.10 Total I
Junsdlctlon Vancouver 01';)200
Ave.
Sale Date 03/05/1996
Reports
Section -Townsh IP NW
Document Type D-QCD
Transportation
East City
Impact Fee
Transportation
243
Analysis Zone
Waste Connections
Day
District
o
Burning Allowed No
[L~gal Stuff]
Disclaimer
Demographics
Economic Handbook
Account Building Documents I Environmental I Permits Sales Search Tax,
Wetlands and Soil Types Geological Hazards Habitat
Census 2000 Profiles
Wetland Class: No Mapping Info.. Info ..
Census QUick Facts Ind icators
Slope Stability' Pnonty Ha
Wetland Inventory. Into. No Mapping
Geological
Indicators
GIS Programs Hazard. Habitat An
Flood Hazard Area: lnf() .. Outside Flood
NEHRP Class: C Species Ar,
Index of Atlas Maps Area
Very Archaeolo~
Liquifaction-
Proposed Flood Hazard Area: Outside Flood
GIS Metadata Low
Info ... Area
GIS Training Proposed FEMA Flood Zone Archaeoloc;
Zone X Unshaded Historic Sit
Annexation Tracker Designation: Info ...
200' Shoreline Buffer: No
Soil Types I Class: NOD-:.1:t'idncLMlJ:l
Storefront CARA.
FEMA Map I FIRM Panel lnfo-,. 53002404108
Digital Data
Watershed. Columbia Slope
Applications Sub Watershed. Columbia Slope
Publications If you have any questions concerning the data on this page, please contact Clark County Comrr
(360) 397-2375, Email: commdev@clark.wp.gov
Printed Maps
Custom Maps Print Version I Create a ,PDF Report
Photography
!1~gal StUff]
Disclaimer
Reports Clark County does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of
any information in this system, and shall not be held liable for losses
Vacant Lands caused by using this information. Portions of this information may not'
current or accurate. Any person or entity who relies on any informatior
obtained from this system, does so at their own risk.
Contacts
R,CW 42.5.6.070(9) prohibits releasing and/or uSlllg lists of individua
gathered from this site for commercial purposes.
Staff List
Office Location
Clark County Home I Find It! I A-Z Index I News Releases I Jobs I Contact Us
File Location: http://gis .clark .wa.gov/gishome/Propertyj/action = ENVIRON&accou nt= 121937000
For questions or comments regarding the Clark County Web site: Webmaster clark.wa. ov
Demographics
Economic Handbook
Accounl Building I Documents I Environmental Permits Sales Search TaXE
Auditor documents
Census 2000 Profiles
NumberDate Type Recorded By Grantor(s)
Census QUick Facts 4270162Jan 08,2007 DEED OF TRUST STEWART TITLE WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
LLC
GIS Programs 4131698Mar 01,2006 DEED OF TRUST FIRST AMERICAN WATERFORD AT FAIRVvAY VILLA(
TITLE LLC
GIS Training 4131830Mar 01,2006 UCC FIRST AMERICAN WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
TITLE LLC
Storefront 3S9241 9 Feb 24, 2003 COVENANT LANE POWELL WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
Applications VANCOUVER
Publications 3495238Jul 31, 2002 WATER CITY OF WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
Printed Maps
3495239Jul 31, 2002 WATER CITY OF WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
Vacant Lands
EASE~"ENT VANCOUVER LLC
3319183 May 10, 2001 DEED OF TRUST CLARK COUNTY WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
TITLE LLC
TITLE LLC
TITLE LLC
OF LIEN NUDDELMAN
3203698 Mar 20, 2000 LIEN FURRER & SCOTT WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
LLC
319UfA7Jan 28, 2000 LIEN BMC WEST CORP WATERFORD AT FAIRWAY VILLA(
Photography
Reports
Vacant Lands
Clark County Assessors Office: Linda Franklin, Assessor
Street Address: 1300 Franklin, 2nd Floor Vancouver, WA 98666-5000
Contacts
Mailing Address Dept. of Assessment and GIS, PO Box 5000, Vancouver, Washington 98660
Staff List
Clark County Home I Find JtI I A-Z Index I News Releases I Jobs I Contact Us
File Location' http://gis .cia rk. wa, gov/gishome/Property jlaction = DEEDS&accou nt= 121937000
For questions or comments regarding the Clark County Web site' Webmaster clark.wa.qQv
Land Records
Propel-ty Info Center Auditor Document Detail
GIS MapsOnline
Subdivision Browser Document 4270162
Quarter Sections Dt - Deed Of Trust
Title
Auditor Records
Grantor(s) Waterford At Fairway Village Lie
Grantee(s) Banner Bank, Northwest Financial Corp
Demographics
Parcel(s) 121937000
Economic Handbook
Census 2000 Profiles Date Recorded Mon Jan 08 10:06:36 PST 2007
Census Quick Facts Recorded By STEWART TITLE
GIS Programs
Index of Atlas Maps
GIS fvletadata
GIS Training
Annexation Tracker If you have any questions concerning the data on this page, please contact Clark County Auditor's Office. Mal
Phone: (360) 397-2208, Email: aqdltor@clark.wa.goy
Storefront
Digital Data
Applications
Publications
Clark County Assessors Office: Linda Franklin, Assessor
Printed Maps
Street Address. 1300 Franklin, 2nd Floor Vancouver, WA 98666-5000
Custom Maps Mailing Address Dept. of Assessment and GIS, PO Box 5000, Vancouver, Washington 98660
Photography Main phone. (360)397-2391 I FAX: (360) 397-6046
Email: assrgis@clark.wa.gov
Responsible Elected Official: Linda Franklin
Reports
For document requests, please contact Assessment & GIS Public Records Officer by phone
Vacant Lands
(360) 397-2092 ext. 4616 or by email assrgis@clark,wa.9QY
Contacts Clark Count Home I EJillUl!. I A-Z Index I News Releases I Jobs I Contact Us
Staff List
Fi Ie Location. http://g is. cia rk. wa. gov/g is home/au d itor/i ndex. cfm 7Pld = detail&DocN um =42 70162
Office Location
For questions or comments regarding the Clark County Web site: Webmaster@clark,wa.gov
h lt~ :I1!:~ i s.clark. W<l. QOV / 9'i shonlP/;1lln i fnr!innpy rfm 7 n irl=rlpb i1 R, Ilr..,-- l'\T,,~-11 "Y7(\ 1 1:')
APPENDIX 3.0
REGULATORY DATABASES
PARCEL INSIGHT
INC 0 R P 0 RAT E 0
Overview Map 2
Disclaimer 26
. /
./
//
,I
/
~/
/
/ /
0:/
.//
"
0
, . /
//;
/
/
( 4 '/
I
\
\
\
"''.
'.
'.
'\
/./" /..
• ·d
/
"//,/"
/
/.<
/ '/
////
/ //
/
Roloasll
D Secondary Highway Water
Usa Restriction
0
D Slreel
118 114
1
Mile
8 o F H
-----------.-.~~"-
--....
\.
,.,/ \
j
/ .
\,
\,
\
(
i
~. \
I
I,
\
\
I,
"
"
III
Release
D S condary Highway
~
Water
V Use
D Marn Road
0 1/7
Mile
B o H
~. ~ ~I Q.
._...---..~-~--------~-----------~----"""-"'---
, r . /•....
.,
... ·t·
ti.
/
i
.----~-_--. ---"'--"
./
/ ,
\ "
.
(.",' l,..
~.
'* ~_----..__ m
/
'J ~. rf'
-/
.,.
.~
C\
/ '-:--')0 ,.1 .- r
"", ·t
,
I
,.I
,. II ;
I
/
II ( \
"
I
>.
I
\\
'.
!'
+ J
I
\I \, \
'-,
-~
I
/ II
, . \ L' .0
/'
\ ~;
• ~ At
~
"
\, \
\.
.~
.~
f. - '1 ~ I
:~.
/'
/
\ \\
-- .1'/ ,I
"
", "
/
}
10
r-,
Rolease
D Socondary Hlllhw~y Wat'H
V Use
D Ma,n Road
r--,
./ USB Restricllon
0
D
1/2
M,iQ
Street
t
Report 7 729 page 3
Tabular Summc)'"y of Findings
-
RELEASE + A sice !tseed in a darabase '11 r documents a release of hazardous marenalls).
USE 'V A sire lis red In a darabase Iii c documencs rhe use of hazardous marena/(s),
bur nor a release of hazardo s material(s).
USE RESTRICTION 0 A sice listed in a database th t documents a restriccion on the use of the site
related to a release of a haz. rdous maCerial(s) or a formal oversighr decision
from a government agency.
Disr nce
~ ~ ~ ~
Lr, a K; a
l'\j lr\ a
a
2
ci
2
a
2
-2 ~
Total by
a +
Subject a Lr, Lr, a Map
a l'\j Lr, f'. a
Map Class Propercy a a a ci - Class
RELEASE + 2 2
USE 'V 2 2
..
USE RESTRICTION 0 .. _.
-
Discance
~ ~ ~ ~
lr\ a lr\ a
l'\j Lr, f'. a
a
2
a
2
a
2
-2 ~
Total by
Search Subject a Lr, a Lr, a+ Database
a l'\j lr\ f'. a
Database Radius Property a ci a ci - Type
NPL + I.OOM 2 2
RCRA CORRACTs + 100 M
RCRA TsD 'V 0.50 M
CERCUS + 050 M 2 2
CERCUS NFRAP + 050 M
ERNS + 0.00 M
RCRA LQG 'V 0.25 M
RCRA sQC 'V 0.25 M
RCRA CESQC 'V 0.25 M
.
LUST ACTIVE TRIBAL + 0.50 M
LUST INACTIVE TRIBAL + 0.50 M
BROWNFIELOS 0 050 M
-
INsT ENG CONTROLS 0 0.50 M
HMIRs + 0.25 M
TRIS + 0.25 M
CsCsL + 0.50 M
CsCSL HSL + 100 M
CsCSL NFA + 0.50M
SWLF STATE + 0.50 M
LUST + 0.50 M
UsT 'V 0.25 M 2 2
sWLF STATE + 0.50 M
DECISIONS 0 0.50 M
INST ENG CONTROLS 0 0.50 M
RCRA NO 'V 0.00 M I I
ECsl + 1.00 M
LUST + 050 M
UsT 'V 025 M
.
SWLF STATE + 0.50 M
AIR 'l 0.25 M
WATER 'l 0.25 M
HAZMAT + 0.25 M
UST DECOMOR \l 0.25 M
Totals by Distance 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
MAP CLASS
+ 17 0
<
()
f::
\J
MAP 10
GRID
SITE NAME ADDRESS PlIO # DATABASES
'"-'
~
U) ~
~ Ct:
-J '"-' '"-'
'"-'
Ct:
U)
:::J
U)
:::J
MAP CLASS
+ 'V 0
<:
()
i=:
MAP 10 ~
GRIO
SITE NAME ADDRESS PlIO # DATABASES
Li.J
r::
l/) ~
~ a:::
-.I Li.J Li.J
Li.J l/) l/)
a::: ::J ::J
OU_ID 00
Action_ Templare_Order 0
OU_ID.· 00
Action_Code. OS
Action_ShorcName· DISCVRY
Action_Code_ID' 001
Aetion_Lead_ Type. EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Date: 5/17/198800.00:00
Action_ Template_Order: 10
Map 10
10
GRID IPI ID # 53000066 ILAT. 4563847 ILON. -122.64541 IRELEASE +
Site Name Vancouver Water Starion #1 Databases:
0.000 M
E Contamination NPL CERCUS
Address E RESERVE AND N.E. FOURTH PLAIN
BLVD.
VANCOUVER, WA 98663
OU_ID 00
Action_Code RS
ActlOn_ShorCName RV ASSESS
Action_ Code_1D 001
Action_Lead_ Type EPA Fund
ActlOn_StarcDare 1993·12·12TOO·0000
Action_Completion_Dare. 12/12/199300.·000
Acrion_ Template_Order 30
OU_ID 00
Action_Code HR
Action_ShorUVame HAZRANK
ActlOn_Code_ID 00 I
Action_Lead_ Type EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Dare 5/6/1993 00·0000
ActlOn_ Templare_Order· 190
OU_ID.OO
Action_Code NP
Action_ShorCName· PROPOSED
Actlon_ Code_fo. 00 I
Action_Lead_ Type EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Dare 6/23/1993 00·00.00
ActlOn_ Template_Order· 200
OU_ID 00
Action_ Code NF
Actlon_ShorCName. NPL FINL
Action_ Code_lD. 001
Acrion_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Date· 5/31/1994 00:00:00
Acrion_ Templare_Order: 202
OU_fo. 01
Action_Code CO
ActlOn_ShorcName RI/FS
Acuon_Code_1D 00 I
Action_Lead_ Type. EPA Fund
Action_SrarCDate 1997-09-16TOO·0000
Action_Completion_Date· 9/11/1998 00.·00:00
Action_ Templare_Order· 430
OU_ID 01
Actlon_ Code RO
ActlOn_ShorCName. ROD
Action_Code/o. 001
Action_Lead_ Type.· EPA Fund
Action_Complerion_Dare· 9/1 1/1998 00·0000
Acrion_ Templare_Order. 610
OU_ID· 01
Action_Code· CM
ACtlon_ShorCName: PCLOREP
Action_Code_1D 001
ActlOn_Lead_ Type EPA Fund
ActlOn_ Complerion_Dare 9/25/1998 00·0000
Action_ Templare_Order· 895
Map 10
10
GRID IPlIO # 53000066 ILAT 45.63847 ILON. -122.64541 IRELEASE +
Site Name Vancouver Water Station #1 Databases:
0.000 M
E Contamination NPL CERCUS
Address E. RESERVE AND N.E. FOURTH PLAIN
BLVD.
VANCOUVER, WA 98663
OU_fD· 07
Action_Code FE
ACtlon_Short_Name. 5 YEAR
Action_Code_lO: 001
Action_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Date: 9/11/200300:00.·00
Action_ Template_Order: 1010
OU_'DO'
Action_Code. FE
Action_ShorCName 5 YEAR
Action_Code_lO· 002
Action_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Date· 9/10/2008 00:00:00
Action_ Template_Order: 1010
Map ID
12
GRID IPliO # 53000067 ILAT 45.61950 ILON. -122.62247 IRELEASE +
Site Name Vancouver Water Station #4 Databases:
0000 M
E Contamination NPL CERCUS
Address 5TH & BLANDFORD ST
VANCOUVER, WA 9866/
Map 10
72
GRfD IPI 10 # 53000067 i LAT 45.6/950 !LON. -72262247 IRELEASE +
Site Name Vancouver Water Station #4 Databases'
0000 M
E Con tamination NPL CERCUS
Address 5TH & BLANDFORD ST
VANCOUVER, WA 98661
OU_fD 00
Action_ Template_Order 0
OU_fD 00
Action_Code: OS
Action_Shorr_Name. DISCVRY
Action_Code_lO: 007
ActlOn_ Template_Order /0
OU_fD 00
Action_Code: RS
Action_ShorcName: RV ASSESS
Action_Code_lO. 001
Action_Start_Date 1991-12-19TOO:00:00
Action_ Template_Order' 30
OU_ID 00
Action_Code' HR
Action_ShorcName HAZRANK
OU_ID 00
Action. Code. NP
ACtlon_Code_1O 00/
OU_IO: 00
Action_Code. NF
Action_Code_1O 00/
0000 M
E Contamination NPL CERCUS
Action_Code, MA
ActlOn_ShorcName: ST COOP
Action_Code_lO. 001
Acrion_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Acrion_StarCDate: /992-02-28TOO:00:00
Action_Completion_Dare· 8/31/1993 00:00:00
Acrion_ Templare_Order: 300
OU_ID 01
Action_ Code MA
Actlon_ShorCName. ST COOP
Acrion_Code_lO: 002
Acrion_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Action_StarcDate. /993-09-01 TOO:OO:OO
Action_ Templare_Order' 300
OU_ID 01
Action_Code' CO
Acrion_ShorCName. RI/FS
AcrlOn_ Code_1O 00 I
Action_Lead_ Type, EPA Fund
ActlOn_StarcDare. 1992-04·02TOO·00·00
Action_Completion_Date. 9/1/1999 00·0000
Action_ Template_Order· 430
OU_ID 01
Action_ Code RO
Acrion_ShorCName. ROD
ActlOn_Code_1O 00 I
Action_ Lead_ Type' EPA Fund
ActIOn_Completion_Date 9/ I /1999 00:0000
Acrion_ Templare_Order· 610
OU_IO 01
Action_Code CM
Action_ShorCName· PCLOREP
Action_Code_1O 00/
Action_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
ActIOn_Completion_Date: 9/8/7999000000
Acrion_ Template_Order· 895
OU_IO.01
Action_Code. FE
Action_ShorCName: 5 YEAR
Action_Code_lO. 001
Action_Lead_ Type: EPA Fund
Acrion_Completion_Dare. 9/71/200300:00.00
Action_ Template_ Order. 1010
OU_IO 01
Action_ Code' FE
ActlOn_ShorciVame 5 YEAR
Action_Code_IO' 002
Action_Lead_ Type,' EPA Fund
Action_Completion_Date. 9/10/200800:00:00
Action_ Templare_Order: /010
Map 10
16
GRIO F5 IPliO # 53006927 ILA T 45.60184 ILON -122.50310 IUSE '1
Site Name CHEVRON 204998 Databases.
0.144 M
NE RCRA NO UST
Address 16406 SE 26TH ST
VANCOUVER, WA 986833436
Map 10
17
GRID E4 IPliO # 53006868 ILAT 45.60383 ILON. -122.50561 IUSE '1
Site Name FRED MEYER/FM FUEL #093 Databases:
0.242 M
N Address 16600 SE MCGILLIVRAY U5T
VANCOUVER, WA 98683
Map/D
I
GR/D IPliO # 53032083 ILAT45.67545 ILON.-122.58157 IRELEASE +
0.000 M Site Name Pacific Rock Products I, Orchard Faci/it Databases:
E SWLF STATE
Address 8705 NW 1 17TH AVE
VANCOUVER, WA
Site.
Site_'D SCP2
Site_Name Pacific Rock Products I, Orchard FaCIlity
SiteJontaccPhone (360) 254-7770
Site_ContaccName Marsh
Site_Address' 8705 NW I 17th Ave
Site_City.· Vancouver
Site_State: WA
Site2ip. 98662
Name Change. I
FacilityContactLName. Marsh
Company PaCIfic Rock Products, LLC
Facility Phone (360) 254-7770
FSA/CI Comments former PacifiC Rock Products - Orchards Facility - changed 99
Ownership. Private
Region. SWRO
County.· Clark
Facility_ Type: Intermediate
Facility_Use. Recycling Facility
Notes new 7/98
Slte_iD scn
Site_Name Pacific Rock Products 1, Orchard Facility
Slte_ContaccPhone. (360) 254-7770
Site_ContaccName· Marsh
Site_Address. 8705 NW f17th Ave
Site_City.· Vancouver
Site_State. WA
Site_Zip. 98662
Name Change. I
FaCllityContactLName' Marsh
Company PacifiC Rock Products, LLC
FaCility Phone. (360) 254-7770
FSA/CI Comments former PaCIfic Rock Products - Orchards Facility - changed 99
Ownership Private
Region. SWRO
County. Clark
Facility_ Type: Intermediate
Facility_Use: Recycling Facility
Notes: new 7/98
Map iD
2
E
ERNS ERNS
Address COLUMBIA RIV
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
SEQNOS 2650
DESCRIPTlON_OF_'NCIDENT CALLER STA TED A PLEASURE CRAFT IS STUCK AGAINST THE ABUTMENT OF
THE BURLINGTON NORTH RAILROAD BRiDGE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER DUE TO AN UNKNOWN PARTY
THA T UNTIED THE VESSEL FROM MOORING DURING THE COURSE OF THE NIGHT THE VESSEL IS CARRYING
400 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL BUT THERE IS NO SPILL OF MA TERIALS A T THIS TIME. THERE WERE SIX
PERSONS ON BOARD THE VESSEL BUT ALL OF THEM HA VE BEEN REMOVED SAFEL Y FROM THE VESSEL.
TYPLOF_INCiDENT VESSEL
INCiDENT_CAUSE OTHER
INCIDENLDA TL TIME. 2008-07-11 T033 7.00
Map ID
2
GRID IPIID # 53033485 ILAT 45.64473 ILON. -122.68427 IRELEASE +
Site Name COLUMBIA RIVER Databases:
0.000 M
E ERNS ERNS
Address COLUMBIA RIV
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
INCIDENT.DTG OCCURRED
INCIDENT.LOCA TlON. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD BRIDGE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER
LOCA TlON.ADDRESS COLUMBIA RIVER
LOCATlON.STREETI RIVER MILE 104
LOCA TlON_NEAREST_ClTY, VANCOUVER
LOCA TlON.COUNTY: CLARK
LOCA TlON STA TE. WA
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
SEQNOS 2650
DESCRIPTlON.OF.INCIDENT CALLER STATED A PLEASURE CRAFT IS STUCK AGAINST THE ABUTMENT OF
THE BURLINGTON NORTH RAILROAD BRIDGE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER DUE TO AN UNKNOWN PARTY
THA T UNTIED THE VESSEL FROM MOORING DURING THE COURSE OF THE NIGHT THE VESSEL IS CARRYING
400 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL BUT THERE IS NO SPILL OF MA TERIALS AT THIS TIME. THERE WERE SIX
PERSONS ON BOARD THE VESSEL BUT ALL OF THEM HAVE BEEN REMOVED SAFEL Y FROM THE VESSEL.
TYPLOF.INCIDENT VESSEL
INCIDENT.CAUSE OTHER
INCIDENT.DA TL TIME 2008-07-1 1T033 7.00
INCIDENT.DTG OCCURRED
INCIDENT.LOCA TlON. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD BRIDGE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER
LOCA TlON.ADDRESS. COLUMBIA RIVER
LOCA TlON.STREET! RIVER MILE 104
LOCA TlON.NEAREST.ClTY VANCOUVER
LOCATION.COUNTY: CLARK
LOCATION STATE: WA
Map 10
3
GRID IPliO # 53032062 ILAT 4S 67907 ILON. -12266199 IRELEASE +
Site Name COLUMBIA PEST CONTROL DUMP SITE Databases:
0000 M
E Address CERCLIS
8405 CALEF ROAD NE
NFRAP
VANCOUVER, WA 98665
OUID.OO
Action Code. OS
Action. Template.Order. 10
Non.NPLStatus NFRAP
OU ID 00
Action Code. PA
Action Name. PA
Non.NPLStatus. NFRAP
Map 10
3
GRID IPlIO # 53032062 i LAT 45.67907 ILON. -12266199 IRELEASE +
Site Name COLUMBIA PEST CONTROL DUMP SITE Databases.
0.000 M
E CERCUS
Address 8405 CALEF ROAD NE
NFRAP
VANCOUVER. WA 98665
OU 10 00
Action Code. VS
ActIOn Name.· ARCH SITE
Action Code 10 001
Action Lead TVpe. EPA In-House
Action Completion Date. 1988-07-13TOO:00.00
Action_ Template_Order. 1500
Non NPLStatus· NFRAP
Map 10
E SWLF STATE
Address 9701 NW 94TH AVE
VANCOUVER, WA
Site. ,
Site_lO. SCA
Site_Name. AWE Recycling
Site_ContacCName Hardman
Site_Address 9701 NW 94 th Ave
Site_City· Vancouver
Site_State. WA
Site_Zip 98662
Name Change: 0
FacilityContactLName: Hardman
Company: Air, Earth and Water Recycling
Ownership· Private
Region· SWRO
County· Clark
Facility_ Type· Intermediate
FaCIlIty_Use Recycfing Facility
Notes new 7/98
Site_1O SCA
Site_Name· AWE Recycling
Site_ContacCName: Hardman
Site_Address 9701 NW 94th Ave
Site_City Vancouver
Site_State WA
Site_Zip 98662
Name Change 0
FacilityContactLName Hardman
Company_ Air, Earth and Water Recycling
Ownership: Private
Region. SWRO
County· Clark
Facility_ Type. Intermediate
Facility_Use: Recycling Facility
Notes: new 7/98
Map 10
5
GRIO IPlIO # 53035679 ILAT NaN ILON. NaN IRELEASE +
0.000 M Site Name FORMER CLARK COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Databases:
E 4&5 CSCSL NFA UST
Address 13317 4TH PLAIN BLVD NE
VANCOUVER, WA 98662
CSCSL NFA Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sires List No Further Action
Sire FORMER CLARK COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 4 & 5 13317 4TH PLAIN BLVD NE VANCOUVER, 98662, WA
Site: CLARK COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 4 13317 N E 4TH PLAIN BLVD VANCOUVER, WA 98662
Facility Site Id: 93619727
County: Clark
Unit: SOUTHWEST
Map 10
6
GRIO IPlIO # 53035895 ILAT NaN ILON.· NaN IUSE 'Y
Site Name MBP INVESTMENTS LLC Darabases.
0.000 M
E RCRA SQG
Address 30' 96 NE 68TH ST BACK HALF OF
VANCOUVER, WA 98665
Sire MBP INVESTMENTS LLC 30196 NE 68TH ST BACK HALF OF VANCOUVER, WA 98665
HANDLER 10· WAH000032330
NAICS DESC: Wood Container and Pallet Manufacturing
CONTACT NAME. MARLEY PETERSEN JR
TSD ACTIVITY N
Map ID
7
GRID IPliO # 53034707 ILAT 45.64473 ILON. -122.68427 IRELEASE +
0.000 M
Site Name Vaiero LP \Darabases'
E HMIRS
SITL/D 96
RPT_ID 405338
Site_Name Valero LP
Site_State: WA
DATA_SRC E
RPT_ TYPE. A
RPTNO:2006040039
IDA TE. 2006-03-1 OTOO.OO.OO
/TIME. 1315
EVENT Description of Incident: On March 10th 2006, Trov Thompson was hooking Rail car GA TX42 580
containing CCA, a Chromated Copper Arsenate liquid to off load the product to the storage tank. Mr
Thompson
NRCNUM 0
I_CITY VANCOUVER
'_COUNTY CLARK
I_ZIP 98660
'_CNTRY US
,-MODE: 6
TjHASE 263
CSTREET 2625 NW Harborside Drive
CCiTY VANCOUVER
CSTATE WA
CZIP 98660
CCNTRY US
R_SPILL T
RJIRE F
R_EXPLO F
R_SEWER, F
R_ VAPOR: F
R_ENVIR T
R_NO_REL F
F_UND. F
POUND F
CU_HOUSE F
CU_OTHER T
OMG_500, T
M_LOSS, 1000
CDAMAG' 0
P_DAMAG.O
RSP_C05T 0
REM_COST 20000
HLFATAL F
HZJ_EMP 0
HZJ_RSP 0
HlJ_GEN 0
NHJATAL F
NHJ_NBR: 0
HLINj F
HLH_EMP 0
HLH_RSP' 0
HLH_CEN 0
HLNJMP 0
HLN_RSP 0
HLN_CEN 0
EVACUATE, F
EVACPUB 0
EVACEMP' 0
EVAC TOT 0
EVACHRS' 0
MA_CLSD F
Map 10
7
GRID IPliO # 53034707 ILAT 4564473 !LON -/2268427 IRELEASE +
0.000 M Site Name Valero LP lDarabases.
E HMIRS
Address VANCOUVER, WA 98660
MA_HRS:O
ACCIDENT F
SPEED 0
POCNAME' Tony Haberserzer
POC TlTL Terminal Manager
POCCOMP Valero LP
POCSTR 2565 NW Harborside Drive
POCCITY VANCOUVER
POCST WA
POCZIP 98660
POCCNTRY US
POCDA TL 2006-04 -0 5TOO.00.00
POCPHNE 360-772-0470
POCJAX 360-694-5//2
POC TYPE F
Map 10
8
GRID IPlIO # 53034798 ILA T 45 65532 ILON. -/22.54/53 IRELEASE +
Site Name FEDEX FREIGHT Databases:
0.000 M
E HMIRS
Address 12301 NE 56THST
VANCOUVER, WA 98682
SITUD 32
RPUO 414628
Sire. Name FED EX FREIGHT
Sne_Address ] 230 I NE 56TH ST
Sire_City' VANCOUVER
Sire_Srare. WA
Sire2ip. 98682
DATA_SRC I
RPT_ TYPE A
RPTNQ 2006080993
lOA TE 2006-07-26TOOOOOO
ITIME 1030
EVENT DRIVER WAS UNLOADING LTR LOAD A T CONSIGNEE ADDRESS, DRIVER FOUND FRONT PCT FELL
OVER ALL PCTS WERE STACKED 6FT HIGH SO DAMAGE WASN'T NOTICED RIGHT AWAY 44 BOX'S WERE
CRUSHED AND I BOX WAS FOUND WITH
NRCNUM 0
,-CITY VANCOUVER
I_COUNTY. CLARK
,-ZIP 98682
I_CNTRY US
I_ROUTE /230 I NE 56TH ST
,-MODE 4
T]HASE 263
CSTREET 9010NE 13TH AVE
CCITY PORTLAND
eSTATE. OR
CZIP 97211
CCNTRY US
CDOUD DOT 68728
CREG_IO 050404550013MO
R_SPILL T
RJIRE F
RJXPLO F
R,SEWER F
R. VAPOR. F
R,ENVIR F
R,NO,REL F
Map ID
8
GRID IPIID # 53034798 ILAT 45.65532 ILON: -122.54153 IRELEASE +
Site Name FEDEX FREIGHT Databases:
0.000 M
E HMIRS
Address 1230 I NE 56TH ST
VANCOUVER, WA 98682
F_LIND F
POLINO F
CU_HOUSE: T
CU_OTHER. F
DMG_500. F
M_LOSS· a
CDAMAG: a
P_DAMAG a
RSP_COST a
REM_COST a
HZJATAL F
HZJ_EMP a
HZJ_RSP a
HZJ_GEN a
NHJATAL. F
NHJ_NBR a
HLIN). F
HLH_EMP a
HLH_RSP a
HZ_H_GEN a
HLN_EMP a
HZ_N_RSP a
HLN_GEN a
EVACUATE. F
EVACPUB. a
EVACEMP. a
EVACJOT a
EVACHRS a
MA_CLSD F
MA_HRS a
ACCIDENT F
SPEED a
POCNAME: KEVIN GRATIOT
POC TlTL QUALITY ADVISOR
POCSTR 90 lONE 13TH AVE
POCCITY PORTLAND
POCST OR
POCZIP. 97211
POCCNTRY US
POCDA TE 2006·0728TOO.0000
POCPHNE 503-285-58 I a
POCFAX 503-285-9/ 06
POC TYPE. C
Map ID
9
E
Address 2300 E FOURTH PLAIN BLVD CERCLIS
NFRAP
VANCOUVER, WA 98661
Map 10
9
GRID IPlIO # 53032057 ILAT 4563845 ILON -/22.64685 IRELEASE +
Site Name TIRES UNLIMITED Databases·
0.000 M
E CERCUS
Address 2300 E FOURTH PLAIN BL VD
NFRAP
VANCOUVER, WA 9866/
Action Code. OS
Action Name. DISCVRY
Action Code 10. 007
ActIOn Lead Type. EPA Fund
Action Completion Date, /990-07-IOTOO,00'00
Action_ Template_Order· /0
Non_NPCStatus NFRAP
OU 10, 00
Action Code: PA
Action Name: PA
Action Code 10' 00/
Action Lead Type· EPA Fund
Action Start Date. 7997 -09-27TOOOO,'00
ActIOn Completion Date, ) 99 / -09-27TOO,00:00
Action_ Template_Order 130
Non_NPL_Status NFRAP
OU 10, 00
Action Code, SI
Action Name: S/
Action Code 10' 00/
Action Lead Type: EPA Fund
Action Start Date. /99/-09-27TOOOO,00
ActIOn CompletIOn Date. /997 -09-27TOOOOOO
Action_ Temp/ate_Order 160
Non_NPCStatus. NFRAP
OU 10.' 00
Action Code: VS
Action Name: ARCH SITE
Action Code 10· 001
Action Lead Type· EPA In-House
Action Completion Date /991-09-27TOOOO·00
Action_ Template_Order 1500
Non_NPCStatus NFRAP
Map 10
11
GRID IPIID#53005418 ILAT 45,67833 ILON: -122,62299 IUSE '\/
LQG
SQG
CESQG
RCRA NO /0/27//992
Map 10
IT
GRIO IPIIO#53005418 ILAT 45 67833 ILON. -12262299 IUSE Y
Site Name ELECTRO HEA VY EQUIPMENT Databases:
0.000 M
E RCRA NO
Address 7525 ME 48TH ST
VANCOUVER, WA 986611342
Map 10
13
GRIO IPlIO # 53031782 ILAT4564468 ILON.-122.68429 IRELEASE +
0.000 M Site Name VANCOUVER GAS MANUFACTURING SITE Databases:
E CERCLIS
Address 9TH & LINCOLN STREETS
NFRAP
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
OU 10.00
Action Code. OS
Action_ Template_Order: 10
Non_NPLStatus: NFRAP
OU 10.00
ActIon Code PA
Action Name PA
Non_NPLStatus: NFRAP
OUID.OO
ActIOn Code.' VS
Map 10
14
GRIO IPlIO # 53031785 ILAT 4564468 ILON. -122.68429 IRELEASE +
Site Name GEORGE SELLINGER SITE Databases·
0.000 M
E CERCLIS
Address 25212 NE 77TH AVE
NFRAP
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
OU 10.00
Action Code. OS
Action_ Templare_Order /0
Non_NPLStatus· NFRAP
OU 10.00
Action Code: PA
Action Name: PA
Non_NPL_Starus· NFRAP
OU 10. 00
Action Code. VS
Non_NPLStarus. NFRAP
Map JO
15
GRIO IPI JO # 53031543 ILAT: 45.64468 ILON: -122.68429 IRELEASE +
Site Name SPS RAILWAY Databases:
0.000 M
E CERCUS
Address 1515 NORTH 39TH ST
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
OU_IO 00
Action_ Template_Order: 0
Map 10
15
CRIO IPliO # 53037543 ILAT 45.64468 ILON -72268429 IRELEASE +
Site Name SPS RAILWAY Databases.
0000 M
E CERCUS
Address 1515 NORTH 39TH ST
VANCOUVER, WA 98660
OU_IO' 00
Action_Code: OS
Action_ShorcName· DISCVRY
Action_Code_lO: 007
Action_Lead_ Tvpe: State (Fund)
Action_Completion_Date' 2/5/1988 00:00.00
Action_ Template_Order 10
Non_NPLStatus: Other Cleanup Acttvity: State-Lead Cleanup
OU_ID.OO
Action_Code· PA
Action_ShorCName: PA
Action_ Code_ID. 007
Action_Lead_ Type: State (Fund)
Action_StarcDate 1989-05-0 I TOO.OO.OO
Action_Completion_Date 5/1/7989000000
ActlOn_ Template_Order· 130
Non_NPLStatus Other Cleanup Activity State-Lead Cleanup
OU_ID.OO
Action_Code S7
Action_ShorcName: SI
Action_Code_lO· 001
Action_Lead_ Type: State (Fund)
Action_StarcDate 1990-12-26TOO.00.·00
Action_Completion_Date 12/26/199000.000
Actton_ Template_Order· 160
Non_NPLStaws Other Cleanup Activity: State-Lead Cleanup
OU_IO 00
Action_Code. 00
Action_ShorCName SITE REASS
Action_ Code_IO' 00 I
Action_Lead_ Type EPA Fund
Action_ Comple tion_Date. 7 7/27/2000 00.00.0
ACtion_ Template_Order· 162
Non_NPLStatus Other Cleanup ActIVity· State-Lead Cleanup
OU_IO 00
ActIOn_Code· VA
ACtion_ShorCName OTHERCLEAN
Action_ Code_lO: 001
Action_Lead_ Type: State Only
Action_StarcDate. 2000- 72- 73TOO.00:00
Action_ Template_Order. 185
Non NPL Status. Other Cleanup Activity. State-Lead Cleanup
Information in this Report has been collected and aggregated by Parcel Insight,
Inc. from government agencies and other publicly-available repositories that
likely contain inaccuracies and incomplete data. The purpose of the Parcel
Insight, Inc. aggregation is to provide our Customer with information in an easy
to use and understandable format. Parcel Insight, Inc. cannot ensure the
accuracy of the data that was aggregated and maintained by others. WE DO
NOT WARRANT THA T THE REPORT WILL BE ERROR-FREE. TO THE EXTENT
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, WE DISCLAIM AND EXCLUDE ALL
REPRESENTA TlONS, WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
INFORMATION IN THE REPORT, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY,
OTHER THAN THOSE EXPRESSL Y IDENTIFIED IN THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LlMITA TlON, WARRANTIES OF NON-INFRINGEMENT, TITLE,
SA TlSFACTORY QUALITY, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, AND
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY
LAW, OUR ENTIRE LIABILITY, AND YOUR ONL Y REMEDY, FOR A BREACH OF A
WARRANTY WILL BE EITHER REPLACEMENT OF THE REPORT, OR RETURN OF THE
FEES YOU PAID FOR THE PRODUCT OR SERVICES. PARCEL INSIGHT, INC. AND ITS
THIRD PARTY LICENSORS WILL NOT BE LIABLE IN ANY EVENT TO YOU OR ANY
OTHER PERSON, REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE, FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OR
ACCURACY OF THE PRODUCTS, FOR THE COST OF PROCURING REPLACEMENT
GOODS OR SERVICES, OR FOR LOST PROFITS OR LOST SALES, OR FOR ANY
SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, MULTIPLE OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING FROM OR OCCASIONED BY YOUR USE OF
THE REPORTS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. The
information in this report is provided "as is" and is not to be construed as legal
advice. The information in the report is copyrighted by Parcel Insight, Inc.
2007, all rights reserved, and reproduction in any form is prohibited without
prior written permission of Parcel Insight, Inc.
Contact Number:
The Brownfields Management System (BMS) IS the offtcwl us Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) database of the
8rownfields Program It is designed to assist EPA in collecting, tracking, and updating informatIOn, as well as reporting
on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfields grant programs. BMS captures data on
grantee activities (assessment, cleanup and redevelopment), funding, job training, and details on cooperative partners
and leveraging efforts - a central objective of the Brownfields Program.
The No Further Remedwl Action Planned (NFRAP) or "Archived" designation means that, to the best of the EPA's
knowledge, Superfund has completed its assessment at a Site, and has determined no further steps to list this site on
the NPL will be taken unless information indicating this decision was not appropriate or other consideratIOns make a
recommendation for listing appropriate at a later rime. The US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may perform a
minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new informatIOn
becomes available and in these cases, the Archive designation is removed and the site is returned to the CERCUS
inventory if more sustentative assessment and/or any cleanup work is necessary under the Federal Superfund
program. An archive decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it means
only that based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Sites are archived as
h,stoncal records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. The States will coordinate with EPA
to determine if any sites should be returned to CERCUS because of newly identified contamination problems at the site
It is important to note the sites on CERCUS and the archived list will change as the sites are being investigated or if
new Information becomes available.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCUS) list contains
information on hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardOUS waste sites and remedial activities. CERCUS is a database
used by the US Environmenral Protection Agency (EPA) to track activities conducted under its Superfund program
Specific informatIOn is tracked for each individual site. The database includes sites that are on the National Priorities
List (NPL) or being considered for the NPL. The CERCUS Database displays site information for NPL sites (ie, sites
proposed to the NPL, currently on the final NPL or deleted from the final NPL. NPL Sites are listed separately on the
NPL data set. Once a site is added to CERCUS, the next step in evaluating the potential problem is the completion of a
preliminary assessment (PA) The purpose of the PA is to determine whether the site warrants further Superfund
InvestIgation. The PA is typically an information gathering phase for which sampling does not take place A PA is
usually completed within one year of a site being listed in CERCUS Based on the conclusions of the PA, a site could be
recommended for a) no further action under the EPA Superfund program; b) a sampling site investIgation to collect
clata for further evaluatIOn and pOSSIble nomination to the NPL; or c) an emergency or time·critical removal
(short· term cleanup). Active CERCUS sites are sites at whIch sIte assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost
recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted under the Superfund program CERCUS excludes sites
which EPA has assessed and designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned", or archive, sites. EPA is aware that the
CERCUS Inventory is often used as a resource in assessing property People conducting such assessments should not
miSInterpret the meaning of a site being contained in CERCUS Such sites are not necessarily contaminated, and sites
not in CERCUS are not necessarily contaminant·free.
No Further Action Site List This data set contains information about sites previously on the Confirmed and Suspected
Contaminated Sites list (above) that have received a No Further Action (NFA) determination Because it is necessary to
maintain historical records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up, sites are not deleted from the
database when cleanup activities are completed. Instead, a No Further Action code is entered based upon the type of
NFA determination the site received. The NFA code lists the basis for the NFA determination.
Contact Number:
The data set contains information about sites that are undergoing cleanup and sites that are awaiting further
Investigation and/or cleanup by the Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program Sites on the Hazardous SItes List
(ie, those that have been ranked using the Washington Ranking Model) are included In this data set. Within 90 days of
learning of a potentially contaminated site, the Department of Ecology conducts an initial investigation of each site. If
the initial investigation shows that further action is needed, the site will appear in the Confirmed & Suspected
Contaminated Sites (CSCS) Report. Once remedial action has been completed, the Toxics Cleanup Program's
management determines the removal of a site from the CSCS Report The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCS
Report It contains those sites that have been ranked using the Washington Ranking Method Site owners and operators
do not necessarily agree with Ecology's determination of site status.
The Hazardous Sites List (HSL) is required by law 173-340-330 WAC. It includes all sites which have been assessed and
ranked uSing the Washington Ranking Method (WARM) Also listed are National Priorities List (NPL) sites. The
categones of evaluation are linear and Include several steps. The Initial Investigation (II) is a bnef investigation
conducted within 90 davs of receiVing a site discoverv report. The /I step prOVides enough informatIOn to determine If
the site needs further investigation, emergencv cleanup, or no further action. If further action is required, early notice
letters are sent to site owners, operators, etc inviting them to work cooperatively with LIS to resolve any contaminatIOn
problems, AND the site proceeds to the next step. The Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) is an assessment to confirm the
presence of hazardous substances and to determine the relative risk the site poses to human health and the
environment. (Note: Some SHAs are conducted by Ecology staff while others are conducted by local health districts /
departments.) The Hazard Ranking (WARM Score) includes the results of the Site Hazard Assessment step that are used
in the Washington Ranking Method (WARM) to yield a WARM score. The WARM score is a number between 1 and 5,
where a score of , represents the highest level of risk and 5 indicates the lowest assessed risk. A zero indicates that
the site is either on the federal National Priorities List (NPL) or is a sub-site or operable unit of an NPL site. NPL sites
are ranked under the federal Hazard Ranking System (HRS) This WARM score is not removed at the time of a No
Further Action determination as it is kept for historical purposes
The Toxlcs Cleanup Program maintains a list of all formal oversight decision documents under the Model Toxics
Control Act rhat have been agreed to and signed by the Program's manager or designee. These decision documents
include ali Consent Decrees, Prospective Purchaser Consent Decrees, Agreed Orders, and Enforcement Orders under
the Model Toxics Control Act.
The Emergencv Response Notification Svstem (ERNS) is a national computer data base used to store information on
releases of oil and hazardous substances. ERNS supports the Emergency Response and the Title 11/ program The ERNS
program is a cooperative effort among EPA Headquarters, the Department of Transportation (DOT), National
TransportatIOn Svsrems Center (NTSC), the ten EPA Regions, the US Coast Guard (USCG), and the National Response
Cenrer (NRC) ERNS provides the most comprehensive data compiled on release notifications of oil and hazardous
substances in the United States. When a release report is submitted to Federal authorities (e.g., NRC or Regional
offices), the individual reporting is asked a series of questions regarding the release (eg., type, location, volume)
Information concerning all releases originally reported to the NRC or EPA Regional offices is entered into local
computers and transmitted electronically from the NRC or EPA Regional office to the NTSC, where it becomes part of
the ERNS national data base. The procedures for maintaining the initial reports differs between the NRC and the EPA
RegIOns. The NRC maintains electronic copies of all spill reports as they were initially received and does not make any
changes to spill reports once they have been entered into the system. Reports received by the NRC contain informatIOn
that may be valuable to the on-scene coordinators, as well as to enforcement personnel. The information received bv
the NRC is sent to the Regional Offices through the Volpe National Transportation Sysrems Center (VNTSC). Since these
reports may be used in enforcement actions, it is necessary to maintain a copy of the spill report as it was originally
reported Each EPA Region maintains its own RegIOn-specific data base, which is a subset of the national data base.
Imtial spill reports made directly to an EPA Region are maintained as hard copies and kept in the individual Regional
office. When additional information on a release notification is obtained, it is also entered at the Regional level and
electronically transmirred to the national system An initial and modified copy of each report is maintained at VNTSC
ro preserve dara mfegmy
The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) contains data on spills, releases, or other incidents
Involving hazardous materials during the course of transportation. All modes of transportation are included except
pipeline and bulk marine transportation The data set contains the Incident Report Form 5800. / data submitted under
the requirements of Title 49 CFR /7/. /5 and /7/. /6. HMIRS of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) was established in /97/ to fulfill the requirements of the federal hazardOUS materials
transportation law. Part /7/ of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR) contains the incident reporting
requirements of carriers of hazardous materials. An unintentional release of hazardous materials meeting the criteria
set forth in Section 171.16, 49 CFR must be reported on US. Department of Transportation (DOT) Form 5800 I. and
data from the reports received are subsequently entered in the HMIRS database All spills meeting the follOWing
criteria to be reported to PHMSA. I) As a direct result of hazardous materials a person is killed or receives injUries
requmng hospitalization, estimated property damage exceeds 550, 000, an evacuation of the general public lasts for
one or more hours, a major transportation artery or facility is closed for one or more hours, or the operational flight
pattern or routing of an aircraft is altered, 2) Fire, breakage, spillage, or suspected contamination occurs involving
shipment of radioactive materials or infectious substances, 3) There has been a release of a marine pollutant
exceeding 450 L or 400 kg, or 4) Any hazardous material is unintentionally released from a package or any quantity
of hazardous waste is discharged during transportation
Contact Number:
This data set identifies RCRA and NPL sites with institutional and/or engineering controls in place
Contact Number:
This data set is a subset of CSCSL and idenrifies sites where a remedial action was conducred, residual contaminarion
was left on site and on-going instlwtlOnal conrrols required.
Contact Number:
The LUST data file contains information on UST Cleanup sites and cleanup history. Sites that have been cleaned lip and
sites currently being cleaned up are included in the data set. Sites are categorized based on the activities taken.
Awaiting Cleanup means the site has been discovered or reported release, yet no active cleanup measures taken or Site
check (identified the source) begun or completed, yet no active cleanup measures taken or site characterization begun
or completed, yet no active cleanup measures taken. Cleanup Started means responsible party has initiated physical,
bIOlogical. or chemical managemenr of release, e.g. soil excavated, groundwater pumped, vapors extracted, free
producr removed, oxvgen added, erc , site investigarlOns and emergency responses (e.g. venting explosive vapors.
prOVIding borrled water) do not quallfv as activities under cleanup started. Monitoring means groundwater monitonng
is rhe onlv activity occurring at rhe site or site has been characterized, only low levels of soil and/or groundwarer
contaminatIOn remain, and natural attenuation is the chosen cfeanup method or conformational mOnitoring follOWIng
active cfeanup measures. Reported Cleaned Up means owner or consultant reports that contamination has been
cleaned up and/or some soil contamination may remain under existing structures or in otherwise inaccessible areas if
groundwater is not threatened and there has been no migration of contamination into the structure and cfeanup
report has not been formally reviewed by Ecology. A formal review could determine that the site has not been cleaned
up to MTCA standards, No Further Action means the cleanup report has been formally reviewed by Ecology under the
fee-based Volunrary Cleanup Program and resulted in a No Further Action status and Institutional controls may have
been required due to soil contamination that may remain under existing structures or in otherwise inaccessible areas
Contact Number:
The underground storage tank (UST) Cleanup List is a listing of all sites with reported releases of perroleum products
from regulated underground storage tanks (USTs), unregulated USTs, and home heating oil tanks,
Contact Number:
The National Prloriries Lisr (NPL) is an informarion and managemenr rool rhar is a parr of rhe Superfund cleanup
process The NPL serves primarily informational purposes, idenrifying for rhe Srares and rhe publIc rhose sires or orher
releases rhar appear ro warranr remedial aerions The identificarion of a sire for rhe NPL is Inrended primarily ro guide
rhe Us. Envlronmenral Prorecrion Agency (EPA) in. derermlning which sires warranr furrher invesr,gation ro assess rhe
narure and exrenr of rhe human healrh and environmenral risks associated with a site; Identifying what
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)-financed remedial actIOns may be
appropriate; notifying the public of sires EPA believes warrant further investigarion; and serving norice ro potentially
responsible parties that EPA may initiare CERCLA-financed remedial action. Inclusion of a site on the NPL does not in
irself reflect a JUdgmenr of the activities of its owner or operaror, it does not require those persons to undertake any
acrlOn. nor does ir assign liabilIty to any person Section 105(a)(8)(B) of CER CLA , as amended, requires that the
srarurory criteria provIded by the Hazard Ranking Sysrem (HRS) be used to prepare a list of national priorities among
rhe known releases or threarened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants throughour rhe
Unlred Srares The NPL lIst is also known as Appendix B of the Nallonal Contingency Plan The Federal Register (FR)
NotIces for NPL Updares page provides a list of FR Notices for proposed and final NPL Updates The Superfund cleanup
process begins wirh sire discovery or norificarlon ro EPA of possible releases of hazardous subsrances. Sires are
discovered by various parties, including citizens, State agencies, and EPA Regional offices. Once discovered, sites are
entered into the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCUS),
EPA's computerized inventory of potenrial hazardous substance release sites (view Superfund Site Information) EPA
then evaluates the potential for a release of hazardous substances from the site through these steps in the Superfund
cleanup process Superfund was created in 7980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensarlon, and Liability Act (CERCLA) ro clean up rhe nation's uncontrolled hazardous waste sites Under the
Superfund program, abandoned, aCCldenrally spilled, or illegally dumped hazardous wastes thar pose a current or
furure rhrear ro human health or the environment are cleaned up. EPA works closely with communities, potenrwlly
responsible parties, scientists, researchers, contractors, and stare, local, rribal, and federal authorities on sire cleanup.
Together with these groups, EPA identifies hazardous waste sites, tests the conditions of the sites, develops cleanup
plans, and cleans up the sites. The site areas depicted in this polygon data set have been developed by EPA solely for
the purpose of a modeling exercise being conducted for the Superfund Workload Assessment Project. These data are
not intended for and should not be used or refrenced for any other purpose.
Contact Number:
Lisr of air perm/rs idenllfied In rhe Oregon Deparrment of Environmental Quality (OEQ) Source Informarion System (SIS)
database of NatIOnal Pollutanr Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Water Pollution Control FacililY (WPCn
permits.
The underground storage tank (UST) Facilities list all decomissioned underground storage tank facilities in Oregon.
Environmental Cleanup Site Informacion (ECSI) darabase is main rained by the Oregon Department of EnVironmental
QualICY (OEQ) co track sites in Oregon with known or potential contaminacion from hazardous substances, and co
dowment sites where DEQ has determined that no further action is required. Data in ECSI is ""working informacion''''
used by DEQs Environmental Cleanup Section Some information in ECSI may be unconfirmed, outdated, or incomplete.
Dara in ECSI is summary in nature, rather than comprehensive. There may be contaminated sites in Oregon that are
unknown to DEQ and do not appear in ECSI. Conversely, the appearance of a site in ECSI does not necessarily mean
that the site IS contaminated. Information in ECSI is subject to change at any time.
List all of the incidents that have occurred which required a HazMat Team Response. The Hazardous Subsrance
Incident Reporting System gathers information from emergency service personnel who have responded to a hazardous
materials inCident. An incident is when a hazardous substance release results in a threat or actual injury to a human,
a domestic animal, wildlife or the environment, or when any property loss results from a hazardous substance release.
Contact Number:
Active Permitted Facilities in Oregon includes active permitted faCilities (including landfills) in Oregon. The types of
permitted facilities Included are. compost, mUnicipal solid waste (disposal) landfills, matenal recovery, transfer
stacions, waste tire and household hazardous waste.
List of stormwater permits identified in the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Source Information
System (SIS) database of NatIOnal Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Water Pollution Control FaCility
(WPCF) permits
ConditIOnally Exempt Small Quantity Cenerators (CESQC) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous
waste, or I kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Requirements for CESQC's include (see also 40 CFR
261.5) CESQC's must identify all the hazardous waste generated. CESQC's may not accumulate more than 1,000
kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. CESQC's must ensure that hazardous waste is delivered to a person or
faCility who is authorized to manage it.
Contact Number:
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action (CORRACTS) list is a summary of those facilities
where corrective action is occurring. The RCRA Corrective Action Program, run by EPA and 41 authorized states and
terrltones, compels responsIble parties to address the investigation and cleanup of hazardous releases themselves
RCRA Corrective Action differs from Superfund In that Corrective Action sites generally have viable operators and
on-gOing operations RCRA grantS EPA and authonzed states the authority to regulate hazardous waste management
facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste Although EPA guidelines are designed to prevent toXIC
releases at RCRA facilities, accidents or other activities have sometimes released pollutants into soil, ground water,
surface water and air. By the year 2020, EPA and the authorized states plan to have largely completed the work of
implementing final remedies at all facilities requiring Corrective Action. (See Coal 3 of the Office of Solid Waste's 2020
Vision for more details) While working toward the 2020 goal, EPA decided to ensure that sites presenting the greatest
risk to human health and the environment are dealt with first. Accordingly, the Corrective Action Program has pledged
to select a final remedy at 30% and PLlt a final remedy In place at 20% of 1,968 highest-priority sites by 2008.
Contact Number:
Large Quantity Generators (LQG) generate / ,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste, or more than /
kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. LQC's may only accumulate waste on site for 90 days, but certain
exceptions apply LQC's do not have a limit on the amount of hazardous waste accumulated on site. There mLlst always
be at least one employee available to respond to an emergency This employee is the emergency coordlnCltor
responsible for coordinating all emergency response measures. LQG's must have detailed, written contingency plans
for handling emergencies LQC's must submit a biennial hazardous waste report.
RCRA sites that are identified as having a RCRA generator identified number but that are not identified as a large
quantity generator, small quantity generator, conditionally exempt small quantitY generator, treatment storage or
disposal (TSD) facility, or RCRA corrective action sites
Contact Number:
Through the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress directed EPA to create regulations to manage
hazardous waste from "the cradle to the grave." Under this mandate, EPA developed strict requirements for all aspects
of hazardoLls waste management including the treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) of hazardous waste. TSDS
include those facilities that treat, store, and/or dispose hazardous waste. TSDS are the last link in the cradle to the
grave waste management system. The requirements for TSDS are found in 40 CFR Parts 264 and 26S and are more
extensive than those that apply to hazardous waste generators or transporters
Small Quantity Generators (SQG) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than / ,000 kilograms, of hazardous
waste per month SQG's may accumulate hazardous waste on site for /80 days without a permit (or 270 days if
shipping a distance greater than 200 miles). The quantity of hazardous on site waste must never exceed 6,000
Contact Number:
The so ltd wasre facility database contains disposal information for landfills, incinerators, and transfer facilities. The
types of faciltties included are those that are permitted under chapter 173-350 WAC, Minimum Functional Standards
for Solid Wasre Handling and chapter 173-35/ WAC, Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste LandfillS. Information in the
solid waste faCility database is obtained through annual reporting forms sent to all landfill types (municipal,
Inert/demolition, limited purpose/special use, and wood wasre landfills) and to wasre-to-energy/incinerators.
The Toxies Release Inventory (TRI) contains informarion on releases of nearly 650 chemicals and chemical categories
from industries including manufacturing, metal and coal mining, electric utilities, and commercial hazardous waste
treatment, among others The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) primary purpose is to
inform communities and Citizens of chemical hazards in their areas. Sections 3 I 1 and 312 of EPCRA require
businesses to report the locations and quantities of chemicals stored on-site to state and local governments In order to
help commUnities prepare to respond to chemical spills and similar emergencies. EPCRA SectIOn 313 requires EPA and
the States to annually collect data on releases and transfers of certain toxic chemicals from industrial facilities, and
make the data available to the public in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). In 1990 Congress passed the Pollution
Prevention Act which required thar additional data on waste management and source reduction activities be reported
under TRI. The goal of TRI is to empower citizens, through information, to hold companies and local governments
accountable in terms of how toxic chemicals are managed. EPA compiles the TRI data each year and makes it
available. The TRI program has expanded significantly since its inception in 1987 The Agency has issued rules to
roughly double the number of chemicals included in the TRJ to approximately 650. Seven new industry sectors have
been added to expand coverage significantly beyond the original covered industries, i.e. manufacturing industries.
Mosr recently, the Agency has reduced the reporting thresholdS for certain persistent, bioaccumulative, and toXIC (PBT)
chemicals in order to be able to provide additional informarion to the public on these chemicals
The list contains InformatIon about "active" leakIng underground storage tanks (LUST) sites on federally recognized
Native American trIbal lands The sites are conSidered active because they are srill subject to future investigation
and/or remedIation by the U.S. EnVironmental Protection Agency The tribes are sovereign entmes subject to federal
laws Underground storage tanks located on tribal lands generally are not subject to state laws. As a result, unless a
state acts as a tribe's agent pursuant to a formal agreement with a tribe, EPA and the tribe are responSible for
Implementing and enforcing the UST program on tribal lands.
The list contmns Information about "inactive" leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) sites on federally recognized
Native American tribal lands The sites are considered inactive because they have been investigated and/or remediated
and the U.S. EnVironmental ProtectIOn Agency has concurred with the inactive sratus. The tribes are sovereign entIties
subject to federal laws Underground storage tanks located on tribal lands generally are not subject to state laws. As a
result, unless a state acts as a tribe's agent pursuant to a formal agreement with a tribe, EPA and the tribe are
responsible for implementing and enforcing the UST program on tribal lands.
The UST list cOIHains information for UST sites and tanks in Washington. Both operational and closed USTs are on the
list. USTs that are excluded from the list include those that have not been registered with the Washington Department
of Ecology Non-registered tanks generally include farm or residential tanks of 1,100 gallons or less capacity stOrIng
motor fuel for noncommercial purposes; tanks storing heating oil for use on the premises where stored; Septic tanks:
Pipeline facilities (IncludIng gathering lines) regulated under the Natural Cas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, or the
Hazardous LiqUId Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, or which is an intrastate pipeline facility regulated under State laws;
Surface impoundments, pits, ponds, or lagoons; Storm water or wasre water collection systems; Flow-through process
tanks; Liquid traps or associated gathering lines directly related to oil or gas production and gathering operations;
Tanks on or above the floor of underground areas, such as basements or tunnels; Tanks with a capacity of 110 gallons
or less. The substances covered under the notification requirements apply to USTs.
Contact Number:
The underground storage rank (UST) Facilities lisr all regisrered underground srorage rank facilities in Oregon
The Washington Deparrment of Ecology (Ecology) conducred a srudy of unaurhorized rire piles in Washington The
legislarure required this study to be complered and submirred by Ecology ro the appropriate sranding committees of
rhe leglslatlJre by November 15, 2005. The report and appendices presenr a derailed discussion of how rhls
informarlOn was collected and assembled. This srudy Identified 54 sires sratewide wirh unaurhorlzed accumulations of
scrap tires. Sire mapping was completed and rhe number of scrap tires was estimated. One sire (Goldendale- Tire
Shredders) accounts for more rhan rwo-rhirds of rhe calculared scrap rires and more rhan half of rhe toral esrimated
cleanup cosrs. Of rhe 54 sires, only five require more rhan 10 estimated on-sire days to complete the individual
cleanups.
CONSULTANT RESUME
RESUME
CEI - 10364
Professional Background
Charles A. Spear, President and founder of Environmental Inspection Services Inc. has over 30
years techmcal experience ranging from facility food technologist to hazardous waste sIte
remediatIon at Federal SUPERFUND sites from California to Maryland. Mr. Spear has successfully
performed over 2,500 Phase One, Phase Two, and Phase Three Environmental Site Assessment
inspections on properties from California to Alaska and east to Maryland. Mr. Spear has managed
such projects as spilled Illllstard gas and organophosphate demilitarization and remediation as a
decontamination sergeant of the U.S.Army Chemical Corps Technical Escort Unit Drill & Transfer
Unit at Umatilla Army Depot, assessments of alternative energy producing facilities such as the
Route 66 ethanol facility in Tucumcari, New Mexico, and removal of leaking solvent underground
storage tanks in California and Oregon.
Specifically, Mr. Spear has worked with such clients as: Federal and state HOllsing & Urban
Development Agencies, the International Fabric Care Industry (IFI), the U.S. Environmental
ProtectIOn Agency, The U.S. Department of Defense, The Oregon Department of EnVironmental
Quality (ODEQ), The Oregon Department of Forestry, INTEL, Sun Microsystems, IBM, Rohm &
Haas, General Electric, AT&T, Texaco, Unocal, BP, Lockheed Missile and Space Center, FMC
Corporation, Oregon Department ofFish & Wildlife, Washington Department ofFish & Wildlife,
Several cities and municipalities, and many banks, private financial institutions, mortgage
companies, developers. attorneys, and realestate investors and lending groups.
Page -1
Mr Spear managed complex tank farm removals at Xidex Corporation in Sunnyvale, Cali fomia and
was the site cleanup manager at the Rose City Plating Site currently developed as the Oregon
Convention Center. Mr. Spear is a certified hazardous waste professional who has coupled military
experience as a Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Specialist (U,S. Army MOS 54E20) with
experience as a professional industrial and process research engineer in both the corrugated paper
and petroleum 1l1dustries.
Mr. Spear has managed food industry quality control as an inplant food technologist and prepared
cost reduction programs as a corrugated boxboard mdustrial engineer in Dallas, Texas. He is
currently registered with the states of California, Washington, and Oregon and is an active member
of the national respected Environmental Assessment Association. Due diligence projects have been
performed throughout the United States from Fairbanks, Alaska to San Diego, California.
Professional Experience
Page -2
Professional Employment/Consultation
Professional Education
Page -3
Additional Education
* Joint Military Material Packaging & Transportation, U.S. Army Chemical Corps
Asbestos Abatement Seminar attendance, San Francisco, Califomia 1987
Thin Layer Chromatography, 1989
Oregon Registered Underground Storage Tank Supervisor, 2008
* Oregon Registered Soil Matrix Assessor, 2008
* Washington Registered Assessor, 1991
* Washington Registered Underground Storage Tank Supervisor, 1991
* Wetland Training Institute Delineation Course Study University of Portland March
1997
* 40-Hour HAZMAT Certified
* AHERA-Certified Inspector
Special Skills
Page -4
Certification
Page -5
Page -6