Professional Documents
Culture Documents
$B
Micro Hydropower Plant with Rotors Pintle and Hydrodynamic Profile of Blades
I. Bostan, V. Dulgheru, V. Bostan
Technical University of Moldova
Chishinau, Republic of Moldova
AbstractThe analysis of hydraulic energy
conversion systems has demonstrated the opportunity for
the development of water kinetic energy conversion
systems compared to potential energy conversion
systems. The micro hydropower plants designed
modularly, allow change of destination and of functional
characteristics by replacing some units with others. The
experimental research of the integral technical system hydrodynamic rotor coupled kinematically with
component units of micro hydro power plants aims at
increasing efficiency of water flow kinetic energy
conversion into useful energy by identifying and, where
necessary, introducing in the technical documentation of
partial structural changes and, sometimes, of conceptual
and technical solutions adopted previously.
Keywords: micro hydropower, hydrodynamic blades, rotor.
1. General overview
The analysis of hydraulic energy conversion systems
has demonstrated the opportunity for the development of
water kinetic energy conversion systems compared to
potential energy conversion systems. A number of
advantages are observed obviously. Technical
advantages: relatively simple hydraulic energy
conversion systems. Economic advantages: the cost of
civil engineering works is reduced considerably.
Ecological advantages: absence of dams and storage
basins. The analysis of existing micro hydroelectric
power plants for river water kinetic energy conversion
has pointed that there are reserves to increase the
efficiency of the utilized turbines. Betz coefficient, equal
to 0,59, represents the maximum theoretical efficiency of
the hydraulic energy conversion. The majority of the
existing systems provides an output factor (coefficient)
for water kinetic energy in the value range of 0,2.
When developing industrial prototypes of micro
hydropower plants for river water kinetic energy
conversion the following criteria and requirements were
taken into account:
- Exclusion of dam construction and of the negative
impact on the environment, implicitly;
- Lowest cost;
- Simplicity of construction and operation;
- Increased reliability at dynamic overload in operating
conditions;
- Resistant composite materials, including conditions
of high humidity;
1
13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mxico, 19-25 June, 2011
A29_605
2. Conceptual diagrams
To avoid the construction of dams, it is possible to use
the river kinetic energy by utilizing water flow turbines.
This type of turbines can be mounted easily and are
simple in operation. Their maintenance costs are rather
convenient. The stream velocity of 1m/s represents an
energy density of 500W/m2 of the flow passage. Still,
only part of this energy can be extracted and converted
into useful electrical or mechanical energy, depending on
13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mxico, 19-25 June, 2011
A29_605
T3 =
T1 1 2 r
,(Nm) ,
i
(2)
13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mxico, 19-25 June, 2011
x 10
V. Conclusions
The experimental research of the integral technical
system - hydrodynamic rotor coupled kinematically with
component units of micro hydro power plants aims at
increasing efficiency of water flow kinetic energy
conversion into useful energy by identifying and, where
necessary, introducing in the technical documentation of
partial structural changes and, sometimes, of conceptual
and technical solutions adopted previously.
v =1.6 m/s
0
3.5
A29_605
v0=1.8 m/s
References
T, (n m)
2.5
[1] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Sobor I., Bostan V., Sochireanu A.
Renewable energy conversion systems. Ed. Tehnica-Info SRL,
Chiinu, 2007. 592p. ISBN 978-9975-63-076-4.
[2] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Bostan V., Ciuperc R. Anthology of
inventions: renewable energy conversion systems. Ed. Bons
Offices SRL, Chiinu, 2009. 458p. ISBN 978-9975-8+-283-3.
[3] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Bostan V., Ciobanu O., Sochireanu A.
Patent No. 2991(MD), CIB F03 B 7/00. Hydro Power Plant /
T.U.M. No. 2005 0136 ; Decl. 16. 05. 2005; Publ. BOPI, 2006.No.2.
[4] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Sochireanu A., Bostan V., Ciobanu O.,
Ciobanu R. Patent No. 2992 (MD), CIB F03 B 7/00. Hydraulic
Plant / U.T.M. No. 2005 0270; Decl 15.09.2005 ; Publ. BOPI
2006.- No.2.
[5] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Bostan V., Sochireanu A., Trifan N. Patent
No. 2993 (MD), CIB F03 B 7/00: F 03 B 13/00. Hydraulic Turbine
/ T.U.M. No. 2005 0272; Decl. 15.09.2005 ; Publ. BOPI 2006.No. 2.
[6] Bostan I., Dulgheru V., Bostan V. Sochireanu A., Ciobanu O.,
Ciobanu R. Dicusar I. Hydraulic Plant.Patent No. 3104 (MD).
BOPI no. 7/2006.
22887 N m
18084 N m
1.5
11938 N m
1
0.5
0
valoare medie
30
60
90
300
330
360
Fig. 3.184. Torque T1 at the hydrodynamic rotor shaft with NACA 0016
profile blades.