Professional Documents
Culture Documents
u
United States Court of Appeals
.
Appellant Strunk Declaration in support of request for an expedited appeal
for 10=5082=cvas time is of the essence with imminent irreparable h a m in
the conduct of the 2010 Census under color of 13 USC §141,13 USC §195
and related law for the 2 USC 52a allotment of US. House of Representative
seats to each State of the several States.
conduct of the 2010 Census under color of 13 USC §141,13 USC SI95 and
related law for the 2 USC §2a allotment of U.S. House of Representative
seats to each State of the several States by the deadline in December 2010.
3. That the Court has afforded Dectarant until May 17,2010 to make
that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
"stand-by pool" of cases. This case will be used to fill gaps in the argument
argument. Placement in the pool wilt not result in delay of your appeal and
may result in significant expedition. To qualify for inclusion in this pool the
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 4
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 5
(3) All parties must stipulate that they will not file any
dispositive motions.
placed in the first available gap in the calendar. Counsel is assured at least
gap emerges, every effort wift be made to calendar the case so that
consideration is not detayed.
oral argument and even though the Court will not ordinarily include in the
"stand-by pool" cases that are inappropriate for oral argument, see D.C. Cir.
2
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 6
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 7
time as the essence with irreparable harm in that the court made an error
(b) Any person aggrieved by the use of any statistical method in violation of
the Constitution or any provision of law (other than this Act), in connection with the
2000 or any later decennial census, to determine the population for purposes of
the apportionment or redistricting of Members in Congress, may in a civil action
obtain declaratory, injunctive, and any other appropriate relief against the
use of such method.
(c) For purposes of this section-
(1) the use of any statistical method as part of a dress rehearsal or other simulation
of a census in preparation for the use of such method, in a decennial census, to
determine the poputation for purposes of the apportionment or redistricting of
Members in Congress shall be considered the use of such method
in connection with that census; and (2) the report ordered by title Vlll of Public Law
105-18 and the Census 2000 Operational Plan shall be deemed to constitute final
agency action regarding the use of statistical methods in the 2000 decennial
census, thus making the question of their use in such census sufficiently concrete
and finat to now be reviewable in a judicial proceeding.
(d) For purposes of this section, an aggrieved person (described in
subsection (b)) includes-
(1) any resident of a State whose congressional representation or district could be
changed as a result of the use of a statistical method chaHenged in the civil action;
(2) any Representative or Senator in Congress; and (3) either House of Congress.
@)(I)Any action brought under this section shalt be heard and determined
by a district court of three judges in accordance with section 2284 of title 28,
United States Code. The chief judge of the United States court of appeals for each
circuit shall, to the extent practicable and consistent with the avoidance of
unnecessary delay, consolidate, for all purposes, in one district court within that
circuit, all actions pending in that circuit under this section. Any party to an action
under this section shall be precluded from seeking any consolidation of that action
other than is provided in this paragraph. In selecting the district court in which to
consolidate such actions, the chief judge shall consider the convenience of the
parties and witnesses and efficient conduct of such actions. Any final order or
injunction of a United States district court that is issued pursuant to an action
brought under this section shalt be reviewable by appeal
3
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 8
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 9
directly to the Supreme Court of the United States. Any such appeal shall be taken
by a notice of appeal filed within 10 days after such order is entered; and the
jurisdictional statement shall be filed within 30 days after such order is entered. No
stay of an order issued pursuant to an action brought under this section may be
issued by a single Justice of the Supreme Court.
(2) It shall be the duty of a United States district court hearing an action brought
under this section and the Supreme Court of the United States to advance on the
docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of any such
matter.
regarding 73 USC 195 arbitrary and capricious data collection during the
enumeration.
time as the essence with irreparable harm in that the court made an error
regarding 2 USC §2a that New York had 47 Electoral college members in
1940 and starting in 1950 were reduced when New York population was say
10 million persons then increased to say 19 million persons but was reduce
4
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 10
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 11
loth with the 14" Amendment related taw; and Declarant will expedite to the
11. That Appellant has no other avenue to seek relief except herein
and is entitled to an expedited schedule in order that the case either may be
rapidly remanded or heard de novo here in that this court does have a three
judge panel that was unreasonably denied below at district as time is of the
essence with imminent irreparable harm will result without the relief
requested, which is that eighty pfus years after 2 USC 32a was passed to
the Ratio IHouse member per 30,000 persons now is outrageously in most
States 1 House Member per more than 630,000 persons and that when
level results in the guarantee of the permanent reign of a House member for
.
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 13
sleeping with a dead person, chifdren of the same sex or outrageous acts of
12. That Declarant demands that New York with a significant larger
population each ten years since 1940 is entitted to at feast to maintain the
same House seats as in 1940 and accordingly that the entire House be
13. And for such other and further relief as the court may deem just
and proper.
f declare under penalty of perjury with 28 USC 1746 that the foregoing is
true and correct and respectfully submitted for expedited action by all parties
involved.
Dated: M a y g , 2010
Brooklyn, New York
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - #281
Brooklyn., New York 11238
(845) 901-6767 Email: chris(j3strunk.w
G
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 14
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 15
Intervenar(s) Brief
Appellee(s)/Respondent(s) Brief
I ntervenar(s) Brief
Appellant(s)lPetitioner(s) Reply Brief, if any
The parties shatt file their briefs on the due date. Maifing on the due date will not suffice.
USCA Form 74
August 2009 (REVISED)
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 16
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 17
rief
Appellee(s)'/Resp~t%eIW(s)*B
\
lnEWe-ntw(sJ-Brief - -_ __ -_ -.
--I
Joint Appendix
Firm
Address
An original of this stipulation should be submitted within 30 days from docketing of the
case to:
Clerk
U.S.Court of Appeats for the D.C. Circuit
333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 18
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 19
Appeaf 10-5082-cv
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On May 12,2010, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under pmalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC
1746, caused the service of a copy of the Appellant's emergency motion for an expedited
appeal for 10-5082-c~as time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm in the
conduct of the 2010 Census under color of 13 USC §141,13 USC $195 and related law for
the 2 USC §2a allotment of U.S. House of Representative seats to each State of the
severai States declared May 12,2010 as a complete set of which each placed in a seafed
folder properly addressed with proper postage sewed by USPS mail upon:
May@)- New
Dated: Grookiyn, 2010York &
F&
Christopher- Earl : Strunk in esse
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - #28i
Brooklyn., New York 11238
(845) 901-6767 Ernail: chris@strunk.ws
t*
.
Case: 10-5082 Document: 1245652 Filed: 05/18/2010 Page: 20