Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a = surface tension
[dynes/cm] or [kg/hr2]
Subscrip ts
Literature
1)
2)
4)
S. and T. Hayakawa:
Furnas,
C. C. and
Engrs.,
36, 135 (1940)
ibid.,
M. L. Taylor:
Trans.
H.,
M.ibid.,Sugata24, and
K. Kamo: ibid.,
H.:
9 (1960)
Am. Inst.
Chem.
Kagaku Kogaku,
ibid.,
30, 226
9) 22,Katayama,
S., T. Koyanagi and F. Yoshida: Kagaku Kogaku,
764 (1958)
E.J.
ibid.,
1, 9(1955
ll) Engrs.,
Norman,41, W.109 S. (1963)and F. Y. Y. Sammak: Trans. Inst.
Chem.
12)235 Onda,
K., E. Sada and Y. Murase: A. I. Ch. E. Journal,
(1959)
Sherwood,
T. K. and
5,
F.A.L.
Holloway:
36, 21 (1940)
T.K.
andC.F.F.A.L.
Holloway:
H.L.,
Ullrich,
A.Z.
merman:
A. I. A.E.
Ch. E.
Journal,
Surosky,
and B.F.
23)
(1950)
24)
Ueyama,
K.,
Uchida,
S.,
al.:
S. Nishigami
ibid.,
ll,
D. W. and P. J. Hoftijzer
27)
and
Vivian,
(1964)
28)
Yoshida,
(1958)
J.E.
29) Yoshida,
30) (1962)
Yoshida,
F. and T. Koyanagi:
F. and T. Koyanagi:
31)
F. and
Weisman,
(1950)
J. and
King:
Bonilla:
Chem.,
and
42,1112
S. Funahashi:
A. I. Ch. E.Journal,
T. Koyanagi:
C.F.
36, 39
(1940)
J.O.
Zim-
and
53 (1947)
26)44, Van529Krevelen,
(1948)
C.J.
ibid.,
Proulx
1, 253Ind.(1955)
Eng.
H. Hikita,
et
Dodge:
25)
10) Lynch,
17)(1966)
Onda, K., E. Sada, C. Kido and S. Kawatake:
Chem. Engrs.,
21)
Sherwood,
22)
Shulman,
(1941)
18, 64 (1954)
5) 24,Hikita,
H., T. Kataoka and K. Nakanishi:
2 (1960)
8) (1950)
Houston,
27, 140
20)
Fellinger,
L.:
Sc. D. thesis,
M.L.T., Cambridge
Fujita,
S. and S. Sakuma:
Chem. Eng.(Japan),
6)
Hikita,
7)
Hikita,
ibid.,
cited
3) Fujita,
Ind.
Eng.
10,
221
Chem., 50,
365
Eng.
Chem., 42,
1099
32) Wen, C.Y., H.D. Simons and M. Leva: West Virg. Univ.
Bull. Eng. Expt. Sta., 26 (1953)
Introduction
Theoretical
analyses for gas absorption
with chemical
reaction have been made by many investigators3>4>6'18):
mass transfer coefficients and the inter facial area can not
be estimated
strictly
at present.
identical
with
the
gas-liquid
interface
(Vat/pL2g)
koR T/atDo
= 5.23
(GWff)
~Q^ (L2/pLaaty-2}
"7 (fiG/PODG)m
kL {pL/[JtLgy n
(atDp)
"2-
(fiL/PLDL)
-1/2
(atDpy-i
(3)
10,
1967
these
Furthermore,
Experimental
1 "1 Apparatus
Work
and procedure
acryl-resin
ring and
distributor
NaOHwere
irrigated
over the packings after atheating
in
the thermostat
tank which was controlled
30lC.
by using
of Nagoya, Nagoya
= 0. 005l (L/aw^Ly/'
* Received
is confirmed
TAKEUCHI**
from a cylinder
OF JAPAN
in
the
range
of 0.03~0.07aim.
Table
End
Normality(JV)
Equivalent
packing
height(w)
effect
of the
packed
column
0.91
0.51
0.27
0.14
0.07
0.073
0.062
0.059
0.058
0.055
1 "2 Experimental
results
The overall capacity
coefficients, Kg<z, were calculated
by the following
equation.
Koa = GMi(Yi - Y2)P/ZJpim
(4)
as the equivalent
height
of
Its value,
however,
was estimated
as
at 3O C
normalities
higher than 0.05iV-NaOH.
of the end effect on liquid rate could
the range of these runs.
The dependency
not be observed in
and
Hoftijzer18) and Brian2 3) presented relations between
/3 and 7*, r and q for second order or pseudo first-order
irreversible
the fluid
reactions
based on the particular
dynamics of the process.
models
of
centration.
0.3
to 0.5.
It
may be expected
that
the
concentration,
the following relation
is found
logfc
= 3.875
+?/.
where
the
value
of factor,
at 30C
(8)
q, is 0.1339>10).
DlVl71
= const.
(9)
Interpretation
for Chemical
Absorption
the experimental
data for the systems
gas and one-valency electrolyte
solution
ion. Hence this relation
was used for
The diffusivities
ratio,
r=Don'/D.ca*,
of various solute
containing sodium
NaOH solution.
in potassium or
Saturated
concentration
of CO2 in an electrolyte
solution was estimated
by the van Krevelen's
method19).
depends on the kinetics of the reaction and on the parameters y, r# and. q. Hatta6), Danckwerts4), van Krevelen
VOL.1
NO.1
1968
63
tanhrVl-E^-D/r?]
first-order
tion.
absorption
UW
additive
for 0.91Ab
amounted to 38%
and 64% for 0.07N.
This range of
solution
with
a chemical
reaction
can be determined
In the calculation
of y-^JkrCjiDL /kL, the concentration
of NaOHwas calculated as the arithmetic mean value of
inlet
and outlet liquid concentrations,
conversion of hydroxide
to carbonate
,
1/Kaa
- 1/koa
+ l/HfikLa
(ll)
of this
assumption
to a.
needs further
than
nearly
equal toby Ttheand Eq.from(12).the definition of T, a is directly
determined
kLa
kLa
a=lkT=~7m5T
>.
_ (12)
Theoretical
and observed
values
of ft for CO2
Yoshida-Miura21)
reported that the inter
facial area calculated
by Eq. (12) was- identical
with aw of Hikita's
equation
and this
in Fig.
3.
of NaOHsolution,
Kkg/m3)
Mkg/m-hr)
0..Q7
0
64
1,037
1,019
1,009
-1,004
1,001
996
area
in
diffusivities,
(j(dyne/cm)
DLx106(m2/hr)
Hx102(-g^^)
\
0.91
0.51
0.27
0.14
surface
3.49
3.23
3.07
2.98
72.5
71.9
71.6
71.4
2.93
2.88
71.3
71.2
6.62
7.13
7.49
7.67
2.26
2.54
2.71
2.84
7.81
7.92
2.91
2.97
m "atm
krx10~7f1
/
^-r-)
\kg-mole"nr/
3.57
3.15
2.93
2.82
2.76
2.59
OF JAPAN
The inter facial area for 1- and l/2-in Berl saddles was
calculated
from KGa data forKGa
CO2-NaOHsystem
of Leva8)
and are shown in Fig.4.
data for 1- and l/2-in:
spheres were obtained by the absorption of CO2 into 12VNaOH solution in the same apparatus described in the
section 1-1. The inter facial areas from these data are
interface,
Cai, Cb.but also on the concentration on hydroxide
ions in liquid,
a was calculated
reaction
concentration
of alkali
and
of the
inter-
Fig. A Inter facial areas for gas absorption with pseudo firstorder reaction
and wetted
surface
Fig. 6
Effect of alkali concentration
rate of absorption of CO2
OL.1
1968
NO.1
saddles
plicable
absorption
in packed
columns.
is the solid-liquid
interface
and it does not include the
area on column's wall. On the other hand, the change
of liquid path and the isolated droplets on the packing
pieces make aw larger. It seems, however, that these
matters compensate each other and hence Eq. (l) agrees
of
of
reaction
on
65
to be a pseudo first-order,
kr
NA
P
= total pressure
= partial pressure
Kaa
== parameter
defined by {Cbq/vCai)
[-]
gas constant
[m3-atm/kg-mole- K]
the maximumpoint is found at about 4.5AT. This difference of Cb between NaOHand KOHsolution comes
from the fact that the variation of the viscosity of KOH
solution with Cb is smaller than that of the viscosity of
[atm]
[atm]
[-]
[K]
[-1
[-]
[ml
Greek letters
[-1
[-1
[kg/m-hr]
[kg/m3]
- viscosity
NaOHsolutions.
P = density
a = surface tension
[dynes/cm] or [kg/hr2]
Oc = critical surface tension of packing material
Conclusion
v
= stoichiometric
Subscripts
[ dynes/cm]
factor
[-]
2)
3)
6)
7)
Hikita,
8)
Leva,
coincided
quite
well with
the
cited
44,
Brian,
Brian,
P.L.T.:
P.L.T.,
E. Journal,
Hatta,
(1928)
2969 (1952)
Sc.
J.F.
D. thesis,
M.I.T.,
Hurley
and E.H.
Cambridge
Hasseltine:
Ind. Eng.
(1956)
A. I. Ch.
7, 226 (1961)
S.:
35,
1389(1932),
31,
869
H. and
T. Kataoka: Kagaku1, Kogaku,
20, 528(1956)
A. I. Ch. E.Journal,
224(1955)
M.:
Nomenclature
12)
concentration
cB
D
G
GMi
g
H
KG
kG
66
of the reactant
average concentration
of liquid
[kg-moles/m3
]
[kg-moles/m3]
of the reactant
diffusivitymass velocity
superficial
superficial
in the bulk
of gas
molar velocity of inert gas
[kg-moles/m2
gravitational
constant
Henry's law constant
[ [kg/m2-hr]
m2/hr]
- hr]
[m/hr2 ]
[kg-moles/m3 - atm]
overall coefficient
[kg-moles/m2 - hr - atm]
gas-phase mass transfer coefficient
[kg-moles/m2 "hr "atm]
liquid-phase
mass transfer coefficient
[m/hr]
liquid-phase
coefficient for chemical absorption
[m/hr]
and
Y. Okumoto:
J.
Chem.
Eng.
15) Sherwood, T.K. and R. L. Pig ford: "Absorption and Extraction" 2 nd. p. 336, McGraw-Hill, New York (1952)
16)man:
Shulman,
H. L., C.F. Ullrich,1, 253A.Z. (1955)
Proulx and J. O. ZimmerA. I. Ch. E. Journal,
17)39, Tepe,
J. B. and B.F. Dodge: Trans. Am. Inst.
255 (1943)
21) Yoshida,F.
22)
Weisman,
(1950)
JOURNAL
D. W. andIndustr.,
P. J. Hoftijzer:
168 (1948)
Int. Chim.
Vassilatos,
G., O. Trass
Eng., 41, 7 (1963)
and Y.Miura:
J. and
C.F.
OF CHEMICAL
and
A.I.
A.I.
Ch. E.Journal,
Bonilla:
Johnson:
Ind.
Chem. Engrs.y
Eng.
ENGINEERING-OF
Chim. Industr.
Can. J. Chem.
9, 331 (1963)
Chem., 42,
1099
JAPAN