You are on page 1of 30

THERE ARE 6 PAGES OF DATA INPUT

DATA INPUT SHEET - HYDROHELP

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

Estimate date

Fixed options for design of all alternatives of powerplant and conduit.


Currency, Canadian $ = 1, USA $ = 2.
Project design standard Industrial (1) or Utility design (2) -------Industrial generator (1) or utility generator (2). ---------------------De-sander required at intake, yes = 1, no = 0. --------------------Dam design for extreme flood, no = 1, yes = 2. ------------------Turbine and powerhouse characteristics.
Total powerplant flow, m3/s.
Desired number of units in powerplant.
Rated head ( Iterate to = F6 ), m.
Estimated powerplant utilization factor.
Normal tailwater elevation m.
Powerhouse flood tailwater level, m.
Average rock level at powerhouse, m.

2.60
2
454.86
=
0.4600
317.00
322.00
325.00

Generator characteristics.
System frequency, Hz.
Generator power factor. (Range 0.9 to 1.0)
Generator inertia ratio to normal, "J".

Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment

Comment
Comment
Comment
Calc head =
454.86
Comment
1.196
Water use in m3/s per year
Comment
--- Must be >
323.87

60.00 Comment
0.90 Comment
1.00 Comment
Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
turbine.

RECOMMENDED TURBINE TYPE


Turbine type
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 2 runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine.
Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine.

1
1
1
0
1

12-Nov-08

Suitability
----YES -------YES -------YES ---------------------------------YES -------YES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project hydraulics.
Normal +ve waterhammer design for penstock %
Allowable negative waterhammer on penstock %
Side stream intakes and stream crossings.
Side stream intakes, ratio of flow to main intake flow.
Stream crossings under/over pipe/penstock.

15
38

Comment
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Cost $M
9.420
6.114
7.405
0.000
0.000
7.657
7.800
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

Allowable waterhammer
calculated by program.

0 Comment
0
Input page 1.

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

Estimate date

Surge tank.
Surge tank used, (1), not used (0).
Surge tank in steel =1, in rock exc. = 2
If in rock, conc lining (1), no lining, (0)
Elevation rock at top of tank, if in rock, m.
Elevation at surge tank tee, meters .
Tank diameter based on min for stability (1), or larger, (2)
If tank diameter is larger, select diameter, m.

De-sander design.
Basin volume ratio.
Design particle size, range 0.1mm to 0.4mm.

Tank hgt, m.
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment

0.0
Tank cost $M.
0.000

0.8

Deck level, m.
Comment
Comment
Comment

847.60

Coefficient of discharge =
845.00
2.30 Comment
2 Comment

1.4

Main concrete weir dam.


Design maximum (1/1000?) flood flow, m3/s.
Design weir + LL outlet flood flow (1/200?), m3/s.
Crest length between abutments at damsite, m.
River bed level, m.
Weir spillway.
Spillway sill level, m.
Required depth of spill over weir, m.
Required number of inflatable rubber dams

0
2
1
800
710

3.0 Comment

300
300
100
840.0

2.2

Must be =<
160 Comment
0.25 Comment

Embankment dams - main dam.


Normal tailwater level at dam, m.
840.00 Must be >
Design acceleration for earthquake, g.
0.25 = 1/1000 DBE
840.00
River or lowest ground level at dam, m.
Embankment material factor for dam stability
1.20 Comment
1.20 Comment
Foundation material factor for dam stability
Rip-rap design.
Effective fetch, km.
1 Comment
100 or m/sec =
Design wind speed, km/hour.
Dam quantity calculation.
Comment
20 Crest El. m=
Dam crest length, m.
5
River width, m.
Average depth of overburden excavation, m.
2
0.7 Comment
Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0)
Length of cutoff excavation, m.
30
8 Comment
Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m.
30 Comment
Concrete or slurry wall length, m.
Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m.
0.5 Comment
Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75).
Embankment dams - side dam.
Name of side dam.
River or lowest ground level at dam, m.
Embankment material factor for dam stability
Foundation material factor for dam stability

12-Nov-08

3.4

840.00
Comment

27.8
848.97

1A
840.00
1.65 Comment
1.60 Comment
Input page 2.

104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

Estimate date

Rip-rap design.
Effective fetch, km.
Design wind speed, km/hour.

12-Nov-08

3 Comment
100 or m/sec =
Side dam
1A
quantity calculation.
0 Crest El. m=
Dam crest length, m.
River width at dam, m.
0
0
Average depth of overburden excavation, m.
0.5 Comment
Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0)
Length of cutoff excavation, m.
0 Comment
0 Comment
Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m.
Concrete or slurry wall length, m.
0 Comment
Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m.
0.5 Comment
Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75).
Conduit from reservoir to powerhouse.
Number of conduits intake to powerhouse.
Automatic (1) or manual (2) optimization.
Select pipe diam (m) for manual optimization.
Select penstock diam (m) for manual optimiz.
Penstock steel ultimate strength, Mpa.
Penstock steel yield strength, Mpa.

1
1
10.000
8.000
482.5
344.7

Intake.
Length of intake channel, meters.
5.0
842.0
Average level of rock at intake, meters.
Average depth of overburden excavation at intake, meters.
Normal FSL at trashracks, m. (by program)
847.30
0.90
Water cleanliness factor. ( 0.5 to 1.0 )
Percentage of reservoir cleared. ( 10% to 100% )
0
10
Approach flow angle to racks. (45 to 0 degrees)
80
Rack inclination to horizontal. (60 to 90 deg. )
Rack blockage ratio. ( 0.0 to 0.25)
0.2
5
Intake pipeline concrete encased length, m.
Pipeline intake to surge tank.
Pipeline on surface (1) or buried (2).
Pipe length in rock sidehill, m.
Pipe length in earth sidehill, m.
Elevation of end of pipeline, m.
Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert.
Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert.
Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0)
Low pressure tunnel size and cost calculation.
Low pressure tunnel length, m.
Adit length, m.
Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete.
Length of tunnel lined with steel, m.

2
1100
2580
660
2.1
2.3
1.5

Comment
L/H ratio =
Comment
Comment.

27.8
849.75

10.6
<<< NOTE

Comment
Comment

Should be >
2.0
Trashr. LSL, m
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment

Comment
840.76
844.00

Comment

Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment

0
0
1 Comment
0 Comment

Read comment

Min. length
tunnel liner,
meters
78.8
Input page 3.

156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Conduit surge tank to powerhouse.
Vertical bore.
Bore length, m.
Ratio of length bore lined with concrete.
High pressure tunnel.
Total high pressure tunnel length, m.
Adit length, m.
Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete.
Tunnel steel lined section length, m.
Buried steel Penstock.
Elevation at upper end of liner/penstock, m.
Penstock sideslope length in rock cut, m.
Penstock sideslope length in earth cut, m.
Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert.
Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert.
Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0)
Surface steel penstock.
Surface penstock length, m.
Earth overburden average depth of cut, m.
Average excavation depth in rock, m.
Tailrace.
Tailrace channel length, meters.
Tailrace ch. rock level at powerhouse DT exit, m.
Tailrace channel average overburden depth, m.
Tailrace Manning friction factor.
Mechanical equipment
Spillway stoplogs for gate adjacent to intake.
Sets of stoplogs.
Monorail hoists.
Spillway gate - adjacent to intake.
Type of gate, flat roller (1) tainter (2)
Intake stoplogs or bulkhead gates.
Sets of bulkhead gates.
Sets of stoplogs.
Monorail hoists.
Intake gates, guides and hoists.
Hoist on tower (1) or on deck (0)
Trashracks.
Type of racks, sectioned (2) or single (1).
Transmission.
Transmission line length, km.
Transmission line voltage, kV
Main transmission difficulty factor.
Local trans to intake, length, km.
Local transmission voltage, kV.
Local transmission to intake, difficulty factor.

Estimate date

12-Nov-08

0
0 Comment
0
0
1 Comment
0 Comment
660.00
569
569
10.0
10.0
1.5
0
1
2

Must be <=

660.0

Comment
Comment
Comment

L/H ratio

10.6

50 Tailrace channel invert


325 level, m.
322.33
5 Flow depth, m.
0.86
0.032

0
0

Gantries.
Comment
0
# of gates.
1
0
0

Gantries.

0
1

0
2 Comment

1
24
2 Comment
6
4
2 Comment
Input page 4.

208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Site access and conditions.
Access road length, km.
Main access road difficulty factor.
Local access road length, km.
Local accsss road difficulty factor.
Temporary bridge over river, span, m.
Frost days at site, from a world Atlas.
Union (2) or non-union (1) labour at site.

Work item.
Earthwork and clearing.
Clearing, per hectare, $/H
Unit cost of overburden excavation, m3.
Unit cost of rock excavation, $/m3.
Unit cost of found excav in sand or gravel for cutoff, $/m3.
Rock excavation in tunnels, $/m3.
Impervious fill in cofferdams, $/m3.
Rock fill in cofferdams, $/m3.
Impervious fill in dams, $/m3.
Filter material in dams, $/m3.
Rock or embankment material in dams, $/m3.
Rock rip-rap, $/m3.
Sidehill rock excavation for pipeline, $/m3.
Sidehill overburden excavation for pipeline, $/m3.
Side creek crossing, cost per crossing.

Estimate date

12-Nov-08

1.2
1.3 Comment
8
1.5 Comment
0
120 Comment
1

Unit cost.
Comment
$7,404.09
$13.04
$52.17
$31.95
$0.00
$0.00
$73.85
$33.43
$44.16
$58.81
$182.01
$39.22
$13.04
$0.00

Suggested unit
cost, based on
quantity of
work.

$7,404.09
$13.04
$52.17
$31.95
$0.00
$0.00
$73.85
$33.43
$44.16
$58.81
$182.01
$39.22
$13.04
$0.00

Concrete work.
Concrete including forms and re-bars, $/m3.
Concrete only, excluding forms and re-bars, $/m3.
Concrete formwork, $/m2.
Reinforcing bars, $/kg.
Concrete in tunnel linings, $/m3.
Dental concrete on rock in dam foundations, $/m3.
Concrete or slurry wall, $/m3.

$1,022.64
$670.25
$94.77
$7.99
$0.00
$0.00
$1,870.58

$1,022.64
$670.25
$94.77
$7.99
$0.00
$0.00
$1,870.58

Steelwork and powerhouse superstructure.


Trashrack steel cost, $/kg.
Pipeline steel cost, $/ton.
Tunnel steel lining cost, $/ton.
Powerhouse superstructure steel cost $/ton.
Powerhouse siding, $/m2.
Powerhouse roofing, $/m2.
Temporary steel pile bridge over river, cost per m.

$6.32
$5,492.57
$0.00
$7,038.09
$157.67
$222.99
$0.00

$6.32
$5,492.57
$0.00
$7,038.09
$157.67
$222.99
$0.00

Ratio of Sclairpipe cost to equivalent steel pipe cost.


Inflation factor, 2008 to present.

0.50 Comment
1.001
Input page 5.

260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Indirect costs.
Feasibility studies and site investigations.
Environmental work.
Detailed designs and contract documents.
Site supervision work.
Contingencies on civil and overheads.
Contingencies on electromechanical work.

12-Nov-08

Estimate date

% of direct
Estimated indirect
cost
Cost $M.
2.0 Change % to
0.501
2.0 suit, based on
0.511
2.0
0.522
estimated
4.0
1.064
costs in
20.0
4.059
Column F
8.0
0.590
6

Interest rate %
Value of generation in cents/kWh.
Operating staff manhour cost per hour, $.

Interest =

1.035

8.0
80 Comment

Summary of program output.


Turbine output at rated head and flow, MW.
5.13
Head iterated OK in auto
Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW.
9.83
Turbine rated net head, m.
454.86
mode.
Conduit average diameter, m.
0.92 Number of generating
Powerplant average annual generation, GWh.
42.34
units = 2
Overburden excavation, cubic meters.
28,907
Rock excavation, m3.
5,459
Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters.
0
Steel penstock and tunnel liner weight, tonnes.
689
Total concrete volume, cubic meters.
2,630
Powerhouse footprint, width and length, m.
8.1 Length, m
22.4
Overall turbine + generator + transformer + conduit efficiency at full load, %.
71.07
Average overall project efficiency, excl transmission, for energy calc. %
78.76
Head loss in conduit as a % of rated net head on turbine. ------------------------- >
14.98
Speed regulation on an isolated system.
Absolutely no speed regulation capability.
Estimated time required for construction, months. ----------------------------------- >
14
Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
Turbine type selected by program.
turbine.

Total project cost, including interest during


construction, $M.

Estimated project payback in years

$33.4

12.0

Worth further analysis, but proceed cautiously.


Input page 6.

END OF DATA INPUT

OUTPUT STARTS WITH A COVER PAGE

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

12-Nov-08

CAN $
$33.3
Cost from intake to high voltage end of transmission line, including interest.

Powerplant average annual generation, GWh.


42.34

Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW.


9.8

Power conduit and powerhouse generation, costs and dimensions developed with
HydroHelp 3 Impulse
An EXCEL program for optimizing hydro powerhouse capacity and conduit size.

FOLLOWED BY A SUMMARY PAGE

HydroHelp 3 Impulse
An EXCEL program for optimizing hydro powerhouse capacity and conduit size.

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

Project parameters determined by program.


Turbine output at rated head and flow, MW.
Powerplant output at rated head and flow, MW.
Turbine rated net head, m.
Conduit average diameter, m.
Powerplant average annual generation, GWh.
Estimated cost, in millions of dollars.
Summary of input data for project.
Number of turbines and flow in m3.
Access road and transmission lengths, km.
Headpond full supply level, m. (FSL)
Normal tailwater level at powerhouse, m.
Number of water conduits to powerhouse.
Conduit length, intake to powerhouse, m.

Date --

5.13
9.83
454.86
0.922
42.3

12-Nov-08

Executive summary

$33.3 CAN $
2
1.2
847.30
317.00
1
4,823

Flow, m3

2.60

LSL =
Trans. km.
Length to head
ratio ------ >

844.00
1
10.6

Powerplant utilization
Summary of program output for some parameters.
Overburden excavation, cubic meters.
factor, %
28,907
46.0
0 Rock Ex. m3.
5,459
Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters.
Steel penstock and tunnel liner weight, tonnes.
689 Turbine runner outside
2,630 diameter, m.
1.19
Total concrete volume, cubic meters.
Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse
Turbine type selected by program.
turbine.
Turbine type eliminated from consideration during
None.
operation of program.
8.1 Length, m
22.4
Powerhouse footprint, width and length, m.
71.07
Overall turbine + generator + transformer + conduit efficiency at full load, %.
Average overall project efficiency, excluding transmission, for energy calc. %
78.76
14.98
Comment
Head loss in conduit as a % of rated net head on turbine --------- >
Speed regulation on an isolated system.
Absolutely no speed regulation capability.
14
Estimated time required for construction, months. -------------------------------------- >
Data input and options selected during data input, may vary for each alternative.
No
Surge tank on conduit.
Diam., m.
Turbine equipped with inlet valve.
Diam., m.
Yes
Conduit optimization option.
By program
Fixed options for design of all alternatives of powerplant and conduit.
Currency, Canadian $ = 1, USA $ = 2. -------------------------------Industrial design (1) or Utility design (2) -------------------------------Industrial generator (1) or utility generator (2). ---------------------De-sander required at intake, yes = 1, no = 0. --------------------Dam design for extreme flood, no = 1, yes = 2. -------------------

0.00
0.395

1
1 Comment
1
0
1
Page 1.

THERE ARE 22 PAGES OF DETAILED OUTPUT

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

TURBINE SELECTION
Total powerplant flow, m3/s.
=
Desired number of units in powerplant.
=
Rated head ( Iterate to = F6 ), m.
System frequency, Hz.
=
Generator power factor. (Range 0.9 to 1.0) =
Generator inertia ratio to normal, "J".
Estimated powerplant utilization factor.
Normal tailwater elevation m.
Powerhouse flood tailwater level, m.
Average rock level at powerhouse, m.

Input data
2.60
2.00
=454.86
60.00
0.90
1.00
0.46
317.00
322.00
325.00

Comment
Comment
Calc head =
Comment
Comment
Comment

--------- Must be >

454.86

323.9

RECOMMENDED TURBINE
Horizontal axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine.
TOTAL POWERPLANT RATED OUTPUT, MW.
Rated flow per unit ( cubic meters / sec. )
Number of runners per unit
# jets per turbine
System frequency ( Hz )
Calculated flow per jet, cubic meters/sec.
Turbo-generator shaft alignment.
Calculated synchronous rotational speed ( rpm )
Turbine inlet spherical valve diameter, m.
Calculated runner pitch circle diameter ( m )
Calculated outside runner diameter ( m )
Calculated jet diameter ( m )
Calculated peak efficiency, all jets operating, %.
Peak efficiency flow/jet. m3/s.
Peak efficiency flow as % of full load flow.
Turbine full load efficiency, %
Calculated turbine full load output ( MW )
Calculated generator full load efficiency, %.
Calculated generator full load output ( MW )

9.8
1.30
1.00
2.00
60.00
0.65
HORIZONTAL
900.00
0.40
0.93
1.19
0.09
0.89
0.98
75.00
88.51
5.13
95.78
4.92

Runner CL El.
Draft tube
sill Elev.
Runaway
speed, rpm =
Unit spacing, m.

Calculated water to wire cost, excluding substation, millions.

323.19
320.13

1620
8.56
0.00
0.00

6.11

GENERATOR DATA
Generator inertia, metric GD2.
Generator inertia, Imperial WR2.
Generator electrical "H" value.
Generator MVA
Mechanical start time for unit, secs. ( Tm.)
Generator full load efficiency, %
Generator speed, rpm.

7.48 Tonnes meters squared.


44,373 Pounds feet squared.
1.52 kW-secs/kVA
5.46
Absolutely no speed
3.38
0.964
regulation capability.
900.0
Page 2

48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

# of units

Powerhouse and crane data.


Powerhouse crane capacity, tonnes.
Powerhouse crane span, with crane over valve, m.
Powerhouse length, m.
Powerhouse width, m.
Powerhouse height, repair bay floor to roof, m.
Powerhouse roof elevation, m.
Powerhouse concrete volume, m3.
Powerhouse formwork, m2.
Powerhouse structural steel weight, tonnes.
Powerhouse repair bay floor level, m.
Distance between unit centerlines, m.
Comment on water to wire cost estimate.
Turbine axis, jet and runner configuration.

20.86
7.42
22.40
8.14
6.57
329.07
265.78
318.94
53.41
322.50
8.56

# of cranes

Walls, m2
Roof, m2.
PH Vol, m3.

Total W/W
Total generator
Cost US$m. capacity, MW
Comment
Comment
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
9.420
9.879
Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine.
6.114
9.833
Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine.
7.405
11.744
Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine.
Comment
Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine.
0.000
9.976
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
0.000
9.862
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
7.657
9.854
Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
7.800
11.900
Combination of capacity, head and flow is suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
0.000
9.992
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
0.000
9.982
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
0.000
9.975
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine.
0.000
8.309
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine.
0.000
9.517
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine.
0.000
97.369
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.
Comment
Vertical axis Francis turbine.
0.000
10.168
Combination of capacity, head and flow NOT suitable for this type of turbine.

401
182
1198

Peak turbine
efficiency
0.895
Reject
0.890
SELECT
0.899
Reject
0.903
Reject
0.893
Reject
0.892
Reject
0.911
Reject
0.912
Reject
0.911
Reject
0.910
Reject
0.854
Reject
0.803
Reject
0.586
Reject
0.912
----------------Page 3

10

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

If the recommended turbine is not satisfactory, a second recommendation (based on cost) can be
obtained by eliminating the recommended turbine from consideration with a zero (0) placed opposite
the recommended turbine in Column D. Suitable turbines are shown in Column E
Turbine type
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 2 runner impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet/r, 2 run. impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 1 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 2 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 3 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 4 jet, 1 runner impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 5 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
Vert. axis, 6 jet, 1 run. impulse turbine.
Horiz. axis, 1 jet, 1 turgo runer turbine.
Horiz. axis, 2 jet, 1 turgo runner turbine.
Horiz. axis BANKI (Ossberger) turbine.
0.8

Suitability
----YES -------YES -------YES ---------------------------------YES -------YES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

SPEED REGULATION CHARACTERISTIC


Selected
Selected
Rapid load offTm/Te
with
LV/gHTe
deflector,
slow load on
Deflector close
2.09
1.69
with spear
valves. 0.19
Valve open
0.24

Penstock start
time / governor
time

0.6
0.4
0.2

Good above 1.0, poor below .

Mechanical start time / governor time

0.0
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

OVERALL PROJECT EFFICIENCY


Overall project efficiency

78.76

90
EFFICIENCY %

98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148

80
70
60

FLOW RATIO %

20

30

40

50

60

20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
70100
0
0

80

9.27
9.25
9.17
8.99
8.84
8.67
8.45
8.20
90
7.92

83.4
83.3
82.5
80.9
79.6
78.0
76.1
73.8
100
71.2
0.000
0.000
Page 4

11

149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Powerhouse plan dimensions.

Unit shaft alignment is

Total length, m.
Full width including piping and control rooms, m.
Length of repair bay, m.
Distance between unit centerlines, m.
Powerhouse height, above repair bay floor, m.

Vertical axis unit

22.40
HORIZONTAL
8.14
As selected by program.
4.28
8.56
13.51
Crane span. 0.00
0.00
Crane capacity in tonnes. 0.0

0.00
0.00
El.
0.00
0.00

0.00
El. 0.00

Top of
ogenerator

0.00

0.00
Repair
bay floor
El. 0.00
0.00
El. 0.00
Flood TWL
elevation
0.00
322.71
TWL. El, m.
0.00
0.00

0.000 Valve diameter, m.


0.00

Runner removal passage width, m. 0.00


Note - Impulse units MUST be set above flood level. They cannot operate submerged, unless
tailwater depressed by compressed air, and this is very expensive due to high demand for air.
Air demand is high due to loss from enrtainment as water falls off runner.
Powerhouse superstructure perimeter, m.
Powerhouse wall area, m2.
Powerhouse roof area, m2.
Powerhouse clearing, Ha.

61.08
825
182
0.2

Page 5

12

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

200
201
202
203
204
205

Crane capacity in tonnes.

Horizontal axis unit.

1.63

3.07

206
207
208
209

El., m. 336.44
7.14
4.49

Crane span

210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243

21.9

8.14
4.02
El., m. 323.19
6.19

El., m. 322.93

Flood TWL
m. 322.00
El., m. 317.00
El., m. 320.13

Valve diameter, m. 0.40


Turbine runner pitch circle diameter, m.

Site access and transmission.

0.935

Access road length, km.


Access road difficulty factor.

Comment
1.2 Cost, $M.
1.3

Local access road length, km.


Local accsss difficulty factor.

8 Cost, $M.
1.5

6.805

Temporary steel pile bridge over river, total length, m.

0 Cost, $M.

0.000

Transmission line length, km.


Transmission line difficulty factor.

1 Transmission kV
2 Cost, $M.

24
0.415

Local transmission to intake, length, km..


Local transmission to intake, difficulty factor.

6 Local Trans kV
2 Cost, $M.

4
0.895

Calculated switchyard cost $M

1.018

0.124

Page 6

13

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Dam weir, de-sanding chamber and access roads.
If there are side stream intakes, ratio of flows to main intake flow.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

0 Comment

Main Dam.
Design maximum (1/1000) flood flow, m3/s.
300 Deck level, m.
Design weir flood (1/200) flow, m3/s.
300
Required height of dam to accommodate low level sluice below trashracks, m.
Crest length between abutments at damsite, m.
100 Comment
River bed level, m.
840
Low level sluice capacity, m3/s.
2.6 Comment
Spillway sill level, m.
845.00
Required depth of spill over weir, m.
2.30 Comment
Required number of inflatable rubber dams
2 Comment
Inflatable rubber Dam.
Selected flood for weir design, m3/s.
Length of one rubber dam, including sloped section, m.
Rubber dam cost, installed. $millions.
Concrete weir.
Coefficient of discharge =
Length of flat weir crest (upstream-downstream) , m.
Low level sluice sill elev. Top just at trashrack sill, m.
Low level sluice width and height, m.
Total length of spillway including end piers, m.
Total length of weir and intake, between abutments, m.
Concrete volume, m3.
Normal flood level for 1/200 flood, m.
Approximate extreme flood level, 1/1000 flood.
De-sander design.
Design flow, m3/s.
Basin volume ratio.
Basin volume, m3.
Basin water depth, m. (semi-circular basin section)
Basin length, m.
Design particle size, range 0.1mm to 0.4mm.
Particle transit time, secs.
Sander weir crest width upstream of trashracks, m.
Low level sluice from de-sander, width, height, m.
Average depth of excavation at intake/weir, m.
Particle drop distance in basin, m.
Flow Velocity, m/s.
Part drop rate, m/s.
Concrete volume, m3.
Flow depth,m
Height, m=
Exc. vol, m3.

847.60
7.70
81.1

300 From cover, line 47


34.8 Maximum ----- >
0.783
1.4
12.8
840.20
0.5
76
81.1
2240
847.3
847.3

2.600
160
416
2.2
43.6
0.25
125
3.1
0.00
0.1
3.4
0.3
0.027
0
0.7
0.00
0

45.19

Total crest length, dams


and weirs, m.
101
Height, m

0.6

Depth of flow over


weir at extreme
flood, m. --- >

2.3

Head loss, m.
Iterate until

0.71

Must be <
Basin width, m.

3.4
4.4

Clearing for desander,


Ha. ------------ >
Height, m.

0.09
0.00

A desander is very
expensive. Would be located
downstream of dam.
Arrangement depends on
topograpy, and is not shown.
Page 7

14

51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

Dam and weir

Schematic showing arrangement of dam, weir and low level sluice.


Elevation top of gate hoist tower, m.
851.67
Number rubber dams.
Extreme flood (1/1000) level, m.
847.30
2
Total length spillway including piers, m.
75.67
Dam crest elevation, m.
847.60
Flood level, m.
847.30
Rubber dam crest elevation, m.
847.30
Full supply
level, m.
Rubber dam sill elevation, m.
2m
847.30
845.00
Low supply
level, m.
34.8
844.00
2.30
Trashrack
30.23
top elev, m.
842.45
Low level outlet gate top, m.
1.55
840.76
Trashrack
sill level, m.
Low level outlet gate sill, m.
840.76
840.20
0.57
Right angle at blue line. Expanded elevation to show intake at right angle to dam-weir centerline.
Total length of desander basin, m.

87.2

Width, m.

5.3

Active settling
length.
Plan typical double desander. If industrial design, 1
43.6
basin, if utility design, there should be 2 basins. Number of desander basins.
Radius R, m.
2.2

Typical section through


desander. Section B - B

Nominal wall thickness, m.

0.48

Concrete area in section, m2

7.63

Concrete volume in desander,


cubic meters.

666

De-sander required at intake. No


Page 8

15

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

Dam design.
Flood level at dam, meters.
Normal full supply level at trashracks, m.
Normal low supply level at trashracks, m.
Normal tailwater level at dam, m.
Design acceleration for earthquake, g.
River or lowest ground level at dam, m.
Embankment material factor for dam stability
Foundation material factor for dam stability
Dam type - rock fill central core (1) or homogeneous (2)
Dam crest elevation, m.
Dam slope (x)/1 Upstream.
x=
Dam height, crest to river/lowest bed level, m.
Dam base width at river level, m.
Rip-rap design.
Effective fetch, km.
Design wind speed, km/hour.
Max. wave height, m.
And period, secs.
Wave length, m.
And slope a/l
Wave run-up on dam.
Minimum freeboard, m.
Weight D50kg rip-rap and average size, Dm.
D50kg =
Rip-rap thickness (m).

MAIN DAM

847.30
847.30
844.00
840.00
0.25
840.00
1.20
1.20
2
848.97
2.14
8.97
38

Comment
Comment
Comment
Dam downstream
slope (x)/1
1.64
=Crest
width, m.
5.3

1 Comment
100 or m/sec =
1.1
Secs =
10.8
a/l =
1.20
1.67
144
Dm =
0.7

Dam quantity calculation.


Dam crest length, m.
20
5
River width, m.
Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0)
0.7
2
Average depth of overburden excavation, m.
Length of cutoff excavation, m.
30
Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m.
8
30
Concrete or slurry wall length, m.
Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m.
0.5
Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75).
Total embankment vol. above river bed level, m3 =
2,519
Rip-rap volume (m3) and average size, (m).
158
Cutoff excavation and fill volume, m3.
4,725
Compacted rock fill
189
Filter transition zone A
83
Rip - rap bedding gravel, m3.
79
Till core
2,007
Foundation rock excavation for core contact, m3.
0
Dental concrete for core contact, m3.
6
Slurry or concrete cut-off wall. Elev. Top of wall, m.
Concrete or slurry wall area, m2.
Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3.

Must be >
317.00
= 1/1000 DBE

27.8
2.6
0.11

0.38

Comment

Comment
Comment
8
Comment
excluding cutoff
d50, m.
0.38
Cutoff excavation
slope =
1.4
Filt. Zone B
83
Clearing for dam,
Hectares=
0.2
Overburden excavation
vol, m3.
757

842.00 Bottom El
120 Width, m.
72

834.00
0.60
Page 9

16

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

0.00

MAIN DAM

Crest elevation, m.
0.00 Width, m.
0.0
Upstream and downstream slopes
Height, m.
0.00 Wall top El
Wall bot El
0.00
0.0

0.0
842.00
834.00

Upstream cofferdam - option.


Dam type 1 - rock fill with central core.
Slurry wall option

0.0
Cut-off depth, m.
Cut-off slope, x:1 =
0.0
0.0 <--Width at impervious contact, m.

848.97 Width, m.
Crest elevation, m.
8.97
Upstream and downstream slopes
Height, m.
2.14
1.64
842.86
5.30

5.30
845.98

Dam type 2 ------------- homogeneous


Upstream cofferdam option
not shown, see above.
Slurry wall option. For level, see above.
Cut-off depth, m.
8.0
8.5 <-- Width at impervious contact, m.
Height of rock fill toe, m.
11.2
2.99
Page 10

17

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

Dam design.
Flood level at dam, meters.
Normal full supply level at trashracks, m.
Normal low supply level at trashracks, m.
Normal tailwater level at dam, m.
Design acceleration for earthquake, g.
River or lowest ground level at dam, m.
Embankment material factor for dam stability
Foundation material factor for dam stability
Dam type - rock fill central core (1) or homogeneous (2)
Dam crest elevation, m.
Dam slope (x)/1 Upstream.
x=
Dam height, crest to river/lowest bed level, m.
Dam base width at river level, m.
Rip-rap design.
Effective fetch, km.
Design wind speed, km/hour.
Max. wave height, m.
And period, secs.
Wave length, m.
And slope a/l
Wave run-up on dam.
Minimum freeboard, m.
Weight D50kg rip-rap and average size, Dm.
D50kg =
Rip-rap thickness (m).

SIDE DAM # 1A

847.30
847.30
844.00
840.00
0.25
840.00
1.65
1.60
2
849.75
2.84
9.75
55

Comment
Comment
Comment
Dam downstream
slope (x)/1
2.34
=Crest
width, m.
5.4

3 Comment
100 or m/sec =
1.9
Secs =
19.9
a/l =
1.12
2.45
507
Dm =
1.0

Dam quantity calculation.


0
Dam crest length, m.
River width, m.
0
0.5
Valley shape factor (0.5 to 1.0)
0
Average depth of overburden excavation, m.
Length of cutoff excavation, m.
0
0
Average depth of cutoff to impervious material, m.
Concrete or slurry wall length, m.
0
Maximum depth of concrete or slurry wall to impervious material, m.
0.5
Slurry wall valley shape factor (0.25 to 0.75).
Total embankment vol. above river bed level, m3 =
0
Rip-rap volume (m3) and average size, (m).
0
Cutoff excavation and fill volume, m3.
0
Compacted rock fill
0
Filter transition zone A
0
Rip - rap bedding gravel, m3.
0
Till core
0
Foundation rock excavation for core contact, m3.
0
Dental concrete for core contact, m3.
0
Slurry or concrete cut-off wall. Elev. Top of wall, m.
Concrete or slurry wall area, m2.
Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3.

= 1/1000 DBE

27.8
3.6
0.10

0.58

Comment

Comment
Comment
0
Comment
excluding cutoff
d50, m.
0.58
Cutoff excavation
slope =
2.0
Filt. Zone B
0
Clearing for dam,
Hectares=
0.0
Overburden excavation
vol, m3.
0

0.00 Bottom El
0 Width, m.
0

0.00
0.60
Page 11

18

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK

0.00

SIDE DAM # 1A

Crest elevation, m.
0.00 Width, m.
0.0
Upstream and downstream slopes
Height, m.
0.00 Wall top El
Wall bot El
0.00
0.0

0.0
0.00
0.00

Upstream cofferdam - option.


Dam type 1 - rock fill with central core.
Slurry wall option
380.13

0.0
Cut-off depth, m.
Cut-off slope, x:1 =
0.0
0.0 <--Width at impervious contact, m.

849.75 Width, m.
Crest elevation, m.
9.75
Upstream and downstream slopes
Height, m.
2.84
2.34
842.09
5.42

5.42
846.50

Dam type 2 ------------- homogeneous


Upstream cofferdam option
not shown, see above.
Slurry wall option. For level, see above.
Cut-off depth, m.
0.0
4.9 <-- Width at impervious contact, m.
Height of rock fill toe, m.
0.0
3.25
Page 12

19

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Project hydraulics.
Flood level at dam, meters.
847.30
847.30
Normal full supply level at trashracks, m.
Low supply level at trashracks, m.
844.00
Design reservoir level for turbine rating, m.
846.2
Number of conduits intake to powerhouse.
1
Number of turbines on each conduit.
2
Calculated rated flow per conduit, m3/s.
2.60
Automatic (1) or manual (2) optimization.
1
Target automatic conduit head loss ratio %
15.85
14.98
Calculated head loss %
Calculated average diam of upstream and downstream steel pipes, m.
10.000
Select pipe diam (m) for manual optimization.
Program nominal pipe diam for manual optimize, m.
10.000
482.5
Penstock steel ultimate strength, Mpa.
344.7
Penstock steel yield strength, Mpa.
Calculated conduit head loss at rated flow, meters.
68.2
454.86
Rated net head (m) - must equal calc. net head.
Calculated net head on turbine, m.
454.86

L/H ratio =
10.6
L = Total conduit length, m.
H = turbine rated head, m.
Comment
Comment
Comment
0.89 Comment
Comment.
<<< NOTE
Penst. Diam,m
8.00
Comment
Comment
<--= iterated cell.
Comment

Intake.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Length of intake channel, meters.
5.0
Intake channel clearing,
842.0
Ha. ----- >
0.01
Average level of rock at intake, meters.
Average depth of overburden excavation at intake, meters.
2.0
Intake and channel overburden excavation, m3.
65
Intake and channel rock excavation volume. m3.
13
Intake gate width and height, meters.
Width =
1.021 Gate height
1.276
Head on intake gate to mid-point, m.
6.535 Intake deck
Intake gate flow velocity, m/sec.
2.00 elevation, m.
847.60
Submergence to top of intake gate, meters.
0.99
Intake gate sill elevation, meters. (maximum elev.)
840.76
Bulkhead gate width and height, m.
Width =
1.123 Gate height
1.531
Head on bulkhead gate, to mid-point, m.
6.535
Water cleanliness factor. ( 0.5 to 1.0 )
0.90 Comment
Percentage of reservoir cleared. ( 10% to 100% )
0
Trashrack gross flow velocity, m/sec.
1.00
Intake clearing,
Trashrack area, square meters.
2.60
Ha ------- >
0.01
Trashrack height, meters.
1.68
Total trashrack width, meters. Per intake.
1.55 Comment
Trashrack width between piers, meters.
1.55 Clear spacing between rack
Total trashrack weight, kg, all intakes.
398 bars, mm. =
19
Maximum unsupported bar length, meters.
0.593 Comment
10 Comment
Approach flow angle to racks. (45 to 0 degrees)
80 Comment
Rack inclination to horizontal. (60 to 90 deg. )
Rack blockage ratio. ( 0.0 to 0.25)
0.2 Comment
Head loss through racks, meters.
0.97 Trashrack sill
Head loss through intake, meters.
0.03 elevation, m.
840.76
Intake height, gate sill to deck, m.
7.54
Total intake(s) concrete volume, cubic meters.
114
Page 13

20

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Side stream total cost, included in intake and equipment costs.

0.000

Conduit intake to surge tank.


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
5 Note - pipeline steel cost
Intake pipeline concrete encased length, m.
Pipeline on surface (1) or buried (2).
2 has been reduced to
1100
Pipe length in rock sidehill, m.
72 % based on
Pipe length in earth sidehill, m.
2580 use of some Sclairpipe.
Elevation of end of pipeline, m.
660
Total pipeline length, meters.
3685 Comment
Pipe vel, m/s.
Pipeline diameter, meters.
0.974 Comment
3.49
Pipeline steel thickness, millimeters.
7.0 Comment
Pipeline(s) steel weight, kg.
468,838 PVC pipe is suitable for this
application.
Pipeline(s) total conc casing pier+anchor volume, m3.
4
Length of Sclairpipe used instead of steel, m.
2,031
Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert.
2.1 Comment
2.3 Comment
Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert.
1.5 Comment
Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0)
Rock excavation for pipeline(s), m3.
2,590 Slope fact=
0.54
Overburden excavation for pipeline(s), m3.
20,040 Slope fact=
0.77
Pipeline and penstock clearing width. Pipe, m.
5 Penstock, m.
3
Pipeline and penstock(s) clearing hectares.
48.2
Low pressure tunnel size and cost calculation.
Low pressure tunnel length, m.
Tunnel rock diameter, m.
Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete.
Length of tunnel lined with steel, m.
Tunnel(s) excavation volume, including adit, m3.
Tunnel(s) concrete lining volume incl. Adit plug, m3.
Tunnel lined section diameter, m.
Liner min. thickness for buckling/handling, mm.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0 Adit L, m =
2.400
1 Conc lined
0
0 Adit vol m3=
0 Adit plug m3
1.824
8.2 Steel liner, kg.

0
0
0
0
0

Surge tank size and cost calculation.


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0 Comment
Surge tank used, (1), not used (0).
Design acceleration for earthquake, g.
0.25 = 1/1000 DBE
Surge tank in steel =1, in rock exc. = 2
2
1
If in rock, conc lining (1), no lining, (0)
Elevation rock at top of tank, if in rock, m.
800 Comment
710 Comment
Elevation of surge tank tee, or conduit "knee", m.
IMPORTANT
2
Tank diameter based on min for stability (1), or larger, (2)
Tank min. diam for stability, m.
0.8 Tank cost $M
0.000
3.0 Comment
If tank diameter is larger, select diameter, m.
NOTE
Turbine rated head, m.
454.9
Upstream conduit length, meters.
3685
Acceleration head loss to tank, m.
47.98 Surge in tank as a % of
0.0
Retardation head loss to tank, m.
32.85 turbine head
Elevation of top of tank, meters.
848.3 Should be less than 8%.
Elevation of bottom of tank, meters.
749.8 Preferably less than 5%.
Tank height, top to bottom, and T to roof, meters.
98.5 T to roof, m=
138.3
Page 14

21

103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Conduit surge tank to powerhouse.
Vertical bore size and quantity calculation.
Bore length, m.
Ratio of length bore lined with concrete.
Bore excavation volume, m3.
Bore concrete lining volume, m3.
High pressure tunnel.
Total high pressure tunnel length, m.
Adit L, m =
Tunnel diameter, m.
Ratio of length tunnel lined with concrete.
Tunnel excavation volume, including adit, m3.
Tunnel concrete lining volume incl. adit plug, m3.
Tunnel concrete lined section diameter, m.
Tunnel steel lined section length, m.
Calc. liner thickness ups. end for buckling, mm.
Tunnel lined section excavation volume, m3.
Concrete around liner, m3.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0 Bore diam, m.
0
0 Bore lined section
0 diameter, m.

1.171

0.890

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0
0
2.300
1
0 Adit vol m3=
0
0 Adit plug m3
0
1.748
0 Tunnel d. m
2.748
15.1 Liner d. m.=
1.748
0
0 Steel liner kg.
0

Buried steel Penstock.


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
660.00
Elevation at upper end of liner/penstock, m.
Penstock length and sideslope in rock cut, m.
569.00
Penstock length and sideslope in earth cut, m.
569.00
10.00 Slope fact=
0.1
Average sidehill slope in rock, hor. to 1 vert.
Average sidehill earth slope, horiz. to 1 vert.
10.00 Slope fact=
0.1
1.50 Comment
Sideslope roughness factor. (1.5 to 3.0)
Penstock rock excavation, m3.
724 Earth exc, m3.
1,358
Surface steel penstock.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0
Surface penstock length, m.
Earth overburden average depth of cut, m.
1
2
Average excavation depth in rock, m.
Penstock rock excavation, m3.
0 Earth exc, m3.
0
Conc. anchor & ring girder pier volume, m3. Anchor =
0 Pier vol, m3
0
Penstock data.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Total penstock/tunnel liner length, meters.
1,138 Comment
Penstock diameter, meters.
0.798
Maximum penstock steel thickness, millimeters.
11.9 Comment
Penstock steel weight, kg.
220,148
Tailrace.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Tailrace channel length, meters.
50 Tailrace channel invert
325 level, m. =
322.33
Tailrace ch. rock level at powerhouse DT exit, m.
Tailrace channel average overburden depth, m.
5 Flow depth
0.86
Tailrace channel overburden excavation volume, m3.
3,222
Tailrace rock excavation volume, m3.
177
Tailrace Manning friction factor.
0.032
Approximate head loss in tailrace channel, m.
0.36 Note - not in conduit losses.
Number of side stream crossings over penstock.

0
Page 15

22

154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Dam and spillway.
Minimum elevation top of hoisthouse, m.
851.67
Flood level, m.
847.30
Full supply
level, m.
847.30
Low supply
level, m.
844.00
Rack top, m.
842.45
Rack height, m.
1.68
Stoplog height, m.
1.53
Gate height, m.
1.28
Rack sill elev, m.
840.76

Deck level, m.
847.60
Total height of
concrete intake
rock to deck, m
7.59
Intake gate
lintel elev, m.
842.04
Intake gate
sill elev, m,.
840.76

Section elevation through center of intake and pipe.


Rack width, m.

1.55
Tunnel or
pipe diam, m.
0.974

Stoplog width, m. 1.12


Gate width, m.

1.02

Total rack width

1.55
Plan through intake at pipe level A - A

Minimum distance racks to


gate, m.
2.50

Plan section B - B

Deck width, m.
Deck length, m
Pier width, m. 0.00

2.88 (minimum)
3.95 (minimum)

Plan at deck level C - C

Page 16

23

205

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Surge tank height, from
pipe/riser "T" to roof, m.

206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253

Surge tank dimensions.


El, m.

Surge tank diameter, m. 0.00

0.0

m.

0.0
Tank top, m.

El, m. 0.0

FSL
El, m.
0.0

Surge rise, m.
0.0
Friction drop, m.
0.0

LSL
El, m.
0.0

Surge drop, m.
0.0
Tank bottom, m.
El, m. 0.0

Upstream
conduit length, m.
0

Riser diam, m.
0.0
Level surge
tank T, m.
0.0

Penstock and conduit hydraulics.


Allowable waterhammer at turbine on valve closure, %.
Upstream pipeline or tunnel LV, m2/s.
Penstock pipe or tunnel LV, m2/s.
Average velocity in conduit intake to turbine, m/s.
Valve times in seconds.
Close (total) -->
Top of tank or
FSL at dam.

Maximum waterhammer
level at turbine, m.
925.92
Max waterhammer head, m.
602.73

0.0
Bottom of tank or
LSL at dam.
0.0
Schematic
showing
waterhammer
conditions on
penstock or
pipeline.

15
3588
5917 Surge tank used on
3.89 conduit ----------No
>
130.4 Open (total) --29.1
>

Negative waterhammer
gradient

Minimum waterhammer
level at turbine, m.
670.53
Min waterhammer head, m.
347.34
Turbine inlet elevation, m.
323.19
Maximum tailwater elev, m.
322.00
Page 17

24

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Mechanical equipment cost.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

Frost days at site, from a world Atlas.


Union (2) or non-union (1) labour at site.
Site installation work cost factor --------->

120
1
0.72

Frost factor.
Labor factor.

0.72
1.00

Gates, gantries, monorail hoists, stoplogs,


If there are side stream intakes, sum of ratio of flows to main intake
Spillway stoplogs for gate adjacent to intake.
Number of openings.
Sets of stoplogs.
Hoist capacity, tonnes.
Stoplogs.
Guides.
Hoist.
Total.
Total cost of spillway stoplog equipment.
Spillway gate - adjacent to intake.
Number of openings.
Type of gate, flat roller (1) tainter (2)
Gates guides and hoists.
Total cost of spillway gate equipment.

Width, =

0.45 Height, =
1 W^2Hh =
0
0 Monorail hoists.
0.500 Gantries.
Supply.
Install.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.57

Width, =

0.57

Width =

1.531

0.45 Height, =
1 W^2Hh =
0.0328349
0
Supply.
Install.
0.000
0.000
0.000

1.123 Height =
1
6.535 W^2Hh =
13
1 Monorail hoists.
0 Gantries.
3.3 Hoist cap. for stoplogs.
Supply.
Install.
Stoplogs or bulkhead gates.
0.010
0.001
Guides.
0.000
0.000
Hoist.
0.000
0.000
Total.
0.010
0.001
Total cost of intake stoplog and/or bulkhead gate equipment.
0.011
Intake stoplogs or bulkhead gates.
Number of openings.
Head to sill for stoplogs/bulkhead.
Sets of bulkhead gates.
Sets of stoplogs.
Hoist capacity for bulkheads.

1.021 Height, =
1 W^2Hh =
9
6.535
0
Supply.
Install.
Total cost of intake gate equipment.
0.013
0.003
Total cost of intake gate guides and hoist equipment.
0.016
Intake gates, guides and hoists.
Number of openings.
Head to sill.
Hoist on tower (1) or on deck (0)

0.4

Width, =

0
0

0
0
0.0

1.276

Page 18

25

53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Powerhouse crane.
Capacity of main hook.
Capacity of auxiliary hook.
Span.
Total.
Total cost of powerhouse crane.
Trashracks.
Number of openings.
Height to sill
Type of racks, sectioned (2) or single (1).
Estimated weight of racks in tonnes.
Total.
Total cost of trashrack equipment.
De-sander sluice gate.
Low level outlet gates.
Head to sill.
Total.
Total cost of low level outlet gate equipment.

Number of cranes.
21 Nominal capacity =
2.1
7.4 WL1.5 =
443
Supply.
Install.
0.231
0.017
0.248

1
21.9

Width =

1.546 Height =
1
WH =
3
7.54 W2Hh =
27
2 Wt. factor
1
0.4
Supply.
Install.
0.003
0.000
0.003

1.68

Width, =
0.00 Height, =
3.27 W^2Hh =
0.00
Supply.
Install.
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.00

Powerhouse ancillary mechanical and electrical systems.


Rated flow per unit, m3/s.
1.30
Generator rated MVA.
5.5
Supply.
Dewatering pumps and piping.
0.000
Cooling water pumps, filters and piping.
0.024
Compressed air, 100psi.
0.020
Heating, ventilating, lighting.
0.011
Total.
0.045
Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems.

Number of units.
Generator rpm.
Install.
0.000
0.011
0.009
0.009
0.019
0.064

2
900.0

Cost of major mechanical equipment, summary.


In millions of CAN $
Total cost of spillway stoplog equipment.
Total cost of spillway gate equipment.
Total cost of trashrack equipment.
Total cost of intake stoplog and/or bulkhead gate equipment.
Total cost of intake gate guides and hoist equipment.
Total cost of low level de-sander gate.
Total cost of powerhouse crane.
Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems.
Total cost of major mechanical equipment,
except turbines.----- --------------------------------------------->

0.000
0.001
0.004
0.015
0.022
0.000
0.248
0.064
$0.353
Page 19

26

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Unit prices used in cost estimate.
Fill in unit prices (blue column) before entering data in other pages. Return to this page after
completing all data entry to see if unit prices are compatible with quantities shown in column
F.

Work item.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

Earthwork and clearing.


Clearing, per hectare, $/H
Unit cost of overburden excavation, m3.
Unit cost of rock excavation, $/m3.
Unit cost of found excav in sand or gravel for cutoff, $/m3.
Rock excavation in tunnels, $/m3.
Impervious fill in cofferdams, $/m3.
Rock fill in cofferdams, $/m3.
Impervious fill in dams, $/m3.
Filter material in dams, $/m3.
Rock or embankment material in dams, $/m3.
Rock rip-rap, $/m3.
d50 size, m. =
0.38
Sidehill rock excavation for pipeline, $/m3.
Sidehill overburden excavation for pipeline, $/m3.
Side creek crossing, cost per crossing.

Unit cost.

Estimated
quantity.

Suggested
unit cost,
based on
quantity of
work.

Comment
$7,404.09
$13.04
$52.17
$31.95
$0.00
$0.00
$73.85
$33.43
$44.16
$58.81
$182.01
$39.22
$13.04
$0.00

48.6
7,509
2,145
4,725
0
0
189
2,007
244
189
158
3,314
21,399
0

$7,404.09
$13.04
$52.17
$31.95
$0.00
$0.00
$73.85
$33.43
$44.16
$58.81
$182.01
$39.22
$13.04
$0.00

Concrete work.
Concrete including forms and re-bars, $/m3.
Concrete only, excluding forms and re-bars, $/m3.
Concrete formwork, $/m2.
Reinforcing bars, $/kg.
Concrete in tunnel linings, $/m3.
Dental concrete on rock in dam foundations, $/m3.
Concrete or slurry wall, $/m3.

$1,022.64
$670.25
$94.77
$7.99
$0.00
$0.00
$1,870.58

2,358
266
319
19,770
0
0
72

$1,022.64
$670.25
$94.77
$7.99
$0.00
$0.00
$1,870.58

Steelwork and powerhouse superstructure.


Trashrack steel cost, $/kg.
Pipeline steel cost, $/ton.
Tunnel steel lining cost, $/ton.
Powerhouse superstructure steel cost $/ton.
Powerhouse siding, $/m2.
Powerhouse roofing, $/m2.
Temporary steel pile bridge over river, cost per m.

$6.32
$5,492.57
$0.00
$7,038.09
$157.67
$222.99
$0.00

458
689
0
53
825
182
0

$6.32
$5,492.57
$0.00
$7,038.09
$157.67
$222.99
$0.00

Ratio of overburden excavation to dam impervious fill -------- >


Ratio of Sclairpipe cost to equivalent steel pipe cost.
Inflation factor, 2008 to present.

0.00
0.50
1.001
Page 20

27

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Approximate cost by quantities in millions $.
Civil work item and unit of measure.
Clearing for all structures. Ha.
Access roads and bridge cost.

CAN $
Cost $/unit. Quantity.
Cost $ Millions
$7,404.09
48.6
0.360
7.823

Embankment dam.
Damsite and spillway overburden exc. cost. (m3)
$13.04
Damsite(s) rock excavation cost. (m3)
$52.17
Cutoff trench sand/gravel excavation cost. (m3)
$31.95
Impervious fill dam and cofferdam from borrow. (m3)
$33.43
Filter material cost. (m3) processed from exc.
$44.16
Rock embankment material cost. (m3) from exc.
$58.81
Rip-rap cost. (m3) selected from excavations
$182.01
Dental concrete for core contact, m3.
$0.00
Concrete or slurry wall volume, m3.
$1,870.58
Sub-total cost of embankment dam. ---------------------------------------------->

757
0
4,725
2,007
244
189
158
6
72

0.010
0.000
0.151
0.067
0.011
0.011
0.029
0.000
0.135
0.413

Side stream approx. total cost, including intake and equip. costs
Intake, de-sander and weir spillway.
Intake and channel overburden excavation cost. (m3)
$13.04
65
Intake and channel rock excavation cost. (m3)
$52.17
13
Intake+weir+desander structure concrete cost. (m3)
$1,022.64
2,354
Trashrack supports and guides cost, kg.
$6.32
60
Sub-total intake civil work cost. ------------------------------------------------------------ >

0.000

Tunnels and vertical bore.


Tunnel rock excavation cost. (m3)
$0.00
Tunnel concrete lining cost. (m3)
$0.00
Bore rock excavation cost. (m3)
$0.00
Bore concrete lining cost. (m3)
$0.00
Low pressure tunnel steel lining cost, installed, ton.
$0.00
High pressure tunnel steel lining cost, installed, ton.
$0.00
Sub-total underground work cost. --------------------------------------------------------- >
Surge tank cost, if required.

0
0
0
0
0
0

Lump sum.

Steel pipelines and penstocks.


Number of side creek crossings, cost per crossing.
$0.00
0
Pipeline rock excavation cost. (m3)
$52.17
3,314
Pipeline earth excavation cost. (m3)
$13.04
21,399
Pipeline concrete casing cost. (m3)
$1,022.64
4
Penstock anchor and pier concrete, m3.
$1,533.96
0
Pipeline/penstock steel cost, installed, ton.
$5,492.57
689
Sub-total pipelines and penstocks. -------------------------------------------------------- >
Tailrace.
Tailrace overburden excavation cost. (m3).
$13.04
3222
Tailrace rock excavation cost. (m3).
$52.17
177
Sub-total tailrace excavation work. ------------------------------------------------------- >

0.001
0.001
2.407
0.000
2.409

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.173
0.279
0.004
0.000
3.784
4.240

0.042
0.009
0.051
Page 21

28

53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Powerhouse.
Overburden excavation, m3.
$13.04
3,464
Rock excavation, m3.
$52.17
1,955
Concrete, m3. (Excluding forms, re-bar)
$670.25
266
Formwork, m2.
$94.77
319
Reinforcing, kg.
$7.99
19,770
Powerhouse superstructure steel weight, tonnes.
$7,038.09
53
Wall area, m2.
$157.67
825
Roof area, m2.
$222.99
182
Total powerhouse civil work cost. ---------------------------------------------------------- >

45
102
178
30
158
376
130
41
1.060

Total civil work cost, millions $ ------------------------------------------------------- >

$16.357

Cost of major mechanical equipment, summary.


Total cost of trashrack equipment.
Total cost of intake stoplog and gate equipment.
Total cost of spillway low level gate and bulkhead equipment.
Total cost of low level de-sander gate.
Total cost of powerhouse crane.
Total cost rubber dams.
Total powerhouse ancilliary mechanical systems.
Sub-total cost of major mechanical equipment, except generators and valves.

0.004
0.037
0.001
0.000
0.248
0.783
0.064
1.136

Generating equipment, transmission and substation at powerplant.


Substation cost, disconnects and transformer.
Transmission lines cost.
Station service.
W/W cost of generating equipment, inlet valve, switchgear and controls.
Sub-total cost of W/W equipment, including valve(s) and transmission.

0.124
1.309
0.028
6.114
7.575

Total electromechanical+transmission work cost, millions $ ---------- >


Total direct cost, millions $ ------------------------------------------------------------ >
Indirect costs.
Feasibility studies and site investigations.
Environmental work.
Detailed designs and contract documents.
Site supervision work.
Civil contingencies and unforseen cost allowance.
Electromechanical contingencies
Sub-total indirect costs.

% of direct
cost
2.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
20.0
8.0

Sub-total
for %
25.068
25.570
26.081
26.603
20.293
7.374

Cost of development including transmission, no interest

$8.711
$25.068

0.501
0.511
0.522
1.064
4.059
0.590
7.247

$32.3

100
101
102

Page 22

29

103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150

BAKER - CHIPMUNK CREEK


Estimated construction time, months.
Interest rate %
Interest during construction, $M.

14
6
1.035

Total project cost, including interest during


construction, $M.

$33.4

Summary of principal project statistics.


Total installed capacity, MW
Estimated annual generation, GWh.
Manhours per annum for operation.
Total overheads as % of total cost.

Head iterated OK in auto


mode.

9.8
42.3
879
22.4

Summary of principal civil work quantities.


Total length of conduit from intake to powerhouse, m.
Length of pipe substituted with PVC pipe, m.
Type
Overburden excavation, cubic meters.
Rock excavation, cubic meters.
Rock tunnel excavation, cubic meters.
Concrete, cubic meters.
Steel penstock and tunnel liners, tonnes.
Powerhouse superstructure steel, tonnes.

Sclairpipe

4,823
2031
28,907
5,459
0
2,630
689
53

Project screening - calculation to determine whether project worth


further analysis.
Site revenue calculation.
Operating staff manhours.
879
Operating staff manhour cost per hour, $.
80
Annual manhour cost $M.
0.070
Total generation capacity (from page 1) --- MW.
9.8
Estimated plant annual average load factor.
0.46
Average overall project efficiency, excluding transmission, for energy calc. %
Calculated annual generation. (GWh)
42.3
Value of generation in cents/kWh.
8.0
Calculated annual value of generation $(m)
3.2
Calculated opearation & maintenance cost $(m)
0.401
Calculated annual net revenue before taxes, interest and amortization. $(m)

Estimated project payback in years

78.76

2.769

12.0

Comments on whether project worth further investigation:-

Worth further analysis, but proceed cautiously.


Page 23

END OF DETAILED OUTPUT

30

You might also like