Professional Documents
Culture Documents
schools and added that there is a perception that supervision is aligned with
psychotherapy, which is irrelevant to school counseling practice. However, the
majority of research conducted in counseling supervision are in the United States
and in Europe with a relatively few in other countries, and with a limited number
in the field of school counseling (Borders, 2005; Peake, Nussbaum & Tindell,
2002; Ellis, et. al., 1996).
Although only a few studies on supervision had been conducted in the
Philippine setting, all the studies provide very important information about the
state of counseling supervision in the Philippines. The study of Pabiton (2000)
showed that practicing counselors of varying educational training levels (e.g.,
working on an MA, MA, PhD) did not differ in their preferences for supervision
focus and supervisory approach. This suggests that educational level does not
seem to influence the kind of supervision sought for by practicing counselor.
Reyes (2001) showed that most of the preferred supervisory functions,
techniques, goals, and roles that Filipino counselor trainees hoped to see during
their practicum/internship training were not exhibited by their site supervisors.
Thus, there is indication that counselor trainees are dissatisfied with the clinical
supervision they received during their practicum or internship. Reyes also
showed in his 2003 study that counselors who have not undergone any formal
supervision during their training rate themselves highly on the dimension of
Autonomy. In fact, their self-ratings of autonomy are quite similar to the selfratings given by those who have actually received formal clinical supervision.
This is also quite an interesting study as it shows the danger of the development
of false autonomy among counselors. The findings of Reyes (2003) was further
elaborated by Mateo and Salanga (2012) in a qualitative study that explored the
unique elements of this sense of autonomy developed even without supervision
that seems to be present in most Filipino practicing counselors.
One of the supervision models that have merged specific to school
counseling is the School Counseling Supervision Model which was largely based
on Bernards Discrimination Model (Luke, Ellis, & Bernard, 2011). The DM is
composed of a 3 by 3 matrix in the dimensions of supervisory focus and
supervisor roles. However, since it has been acknowledged that there is minimal
to no supervision available among school counselors, it will be practical to
initially focus on one of its dimension, which is supervisor roles. One of the
measures of supervisor roles may be addressed by supervisory styles as measured
by an instrument developed by Friedlander and Ward (1984). They defined
87
88
Participants
The study was able to recruit twenty seven respondents, mostly from
Metro Manila. From the sample, about 41 percent have been working as a school
counselor for 4-10 years, and 22 percent have had 3 or less years of experience.
Consequently, 33 percent are within the 28-43 years old age bracket, and 30
percent were below 27 years old and below. Half of the respondents were female
and about failed to indicate their gender when they completed their questionnaire.
Likewise, the respondents identified 56 percent of the supervisors to be female
and 90 percent indicated that their supervisors are older than them.
Instruments
Supervisory Styles Inventory (SSI; Friedlander & Ward, 1984). The SSI
is a 33-item, self-report instrument that describes supervisees' perceptions of their
supervisors' styles. The instrument includes three subscales. The Attractive
subscale contains 7 items such as "friendly," "trusting," and "supportive." The
Interpersonally Sensitive subscale contains 8 items such as "intuitive,"
"invested," and "reflective." The Task-Oriented subscale contains 10 items such
as "structured," "goal-oriented," and "evaluative." The respondents were asked to
rate each item using a 7-point, Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not at all
characteristic) to 7 (very characteristic). Eight additional filler items are
included, resulting in a total of 33 items. The SSI has high internal consistency
estimates (Cronbachs alpha) ranging from .83 to .89. The instructions were
modified to describe the supervisors the respondents had when they had their
practicum and to describe the characteristics of what an ideal supervisor should
be for them.
Supervisee Level Questionnaire Revised (McNeill et al., 1992). The 30
item SLQ-R was used to assess self-rated supervisee Self-Other Awareness (12
items), Motivation (8 items), and Dependency-Autonomy (10 items). Participants
responded to items on 7-point Likert scale with 1 corresponding to never and 7
corresponding to always. Self-Other Awareness had a good consistency
(Cronbachs Alpha = .825) and included items such as: I feel genuinely relaxed
and comfortable in my counseling sessions. and I am able to empathize with
my clients feeling states but still help them focus on conflict resolution.
Motivation (Cronbachs Alpha = .699) had items such as the overall quality of
my work fluctuates; on some days I do well, on other days, I do poorly. and I
89
think I know myself well and am able to integrate that into my therapeutic style.
The scale on Autonomy included items such as It is important that my
supervisor allow me to make my own mistakes. and Regarding my counseling,
I view my supervisor as my colleague. had a poor consistency (Cronbachs
Alpha = .559) which could be attributed to cultural differences in terms of the
concept of autonomy. There were several items that required reverse scoring.
Data Analysis
Descriptive measures of all variables were computed as well as reliability
analyses of the scales used. Within groups t-test was administered to find out if
there were significant differences in the actual and ideal supervisory styles
reported by the respondents.
Results
Descriptive data were computed for (mean, standard deviation) for
responses in the actual and ideal supervisory styles. A within groups t-test was
computed for to determine any significant differences in the perception of the
respondents in terms of supervisory styles.
Table 1 provides a picture of the developmental level of the Filipino
counselor trainee at the time of practicum training. In terms of Self-other
Awareness, the respondents provided above average ratings of themselves. This
suggests a recognition of their ability to be sensitive to individual differences
between themselves and their clients, and across clients. They however provided
average self-ratings for Autonomy and Motivation. This may suggest that they
still see a need for guidance from their supervisors (i.e., they still exhibit some
level of dependency) and also appear to be unstable in their commitment to
becoming a counselor. Although there is no baseline or standard to compare the
mean scores to determine supervisory development level, it appears that the
counselor respondents are within the transition stage of moving from Level 1 to
Level 2 using the IDM model. Level 2 is usually characterized by having
increased level of Self-other awareness but a slight lowering in the dimensions of
Motivation and Autonomy. This would be exemplified by counselor trainees who
begin to realize the importance of recognizing individual differences but at the
same time start questioning whether counseling is really for them (Motivation)
and whether they can already manage counseling their clients on their own
90
(Autonomy).
Table 1
Supervisee developmental level
Developmental Level
Self-Other Awareness
Motivation
Autonomy
Mean
SD
5.57
4.24
4.61
.605
.608
.619
Ideal
6.16 (.72)
8.69 (.76)
5.66 (.69)
Actual
6.02 (.77)
5.06 (.58)
5.55 (.63)
t
-0.797
-22.447**
-0.665
sig
.4327
.000
.511
Discussion
The results presented an interesting picture of school counselors
who undergo supervised practicum training. On the one hand, the majority
of the respondents reported to have been employed as school counselors
for about 4-10 years, which means that by the time they had their
practicum, they already had a couple of years working as school
counselors. Likewise, their mean scores for the SLQ-R are within the
average to above average level, which may suggest approaching the
91
94
Gross, S. (2005). Student perspectives on clinical and counseling psychology practica. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(3), 299-306.
Herlihy, B. et al. (2002). Legal and ethical issues to school counselor supervision. Professional
School Counseling, 6, 55-60.
Kaufman, J. & Schwartz, T. (2003). Models of supervision: Shaping professional identity. The
Clinical Supervisor, 22(1), 143-158.
Ladany, N., et.al. (2008). Practicing Counseling and Psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.
Ladany, N., Walker, J. & Melincoff, D. (2001). Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory
working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision,
40, 263-275.
Mateo, N.J. & Salanga, M.G. (2012) Autonomy in the development and practice of the Filipino
counselor. Philippine Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14(1), 57-85.
Matthes, W.A. (1992). Induction of counselors into the profession. The School Counselor, 39, 245250.
McNeill, B., Stoltenberg, C. and Romans, J. (1992). The integrated developmental model of
supervision: Scale development and validation procedures. Professional Psychology:
Research and Practice, 23(6), 504-508.
Peake, T., Nussbaum, B. and Tindell, S. (2002). Clinical and counseling supervision references:
Trends and needs. Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/ Practice/Training, 39(1), 114-125.
Reyes, J.A.S. (2001) Counseling supervision: Expectations, actual experiences, and preferences of
counselor trainees. Philippine Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4(1), 1-18.
Reyes, J.A.S. (2003) Assessing the impact of counseling supervision on counselor development.
Philippine Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5(1), 101-117.
Romano, J. & Kachgal, M. (2004). Counseling psychology and school counseling: An
underutilized partnership. The Counseling Psychologist, 32 (2), 184-215.
Romans, J.S.C., et. al. (1995). Training and supervision practices in clinical, counseling and school
psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(4), 407-412.
Stoltenberg, C., McNeill, B. & Crethar, C. (1994). Changes in supervision as counselors and
therapists gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,
25(4), 416-449.
Tuason, M.T.G., Fernandez, K. T. G., Catipon, M. A. D. P., Trivino-Dey, L., Arellano- Carandang,
M. L. (2012). Counseling in the Philippines: Past, present, and future. Journal of
95
96