Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fatima Palacios
Edu 210- Summer
College of Southern Nevada
comment was not the friendliest, she didnt direct it to any specific individual.
Also because she is a tenure teacher, she has property right to continue in her
employment.
In the case of Pickering v. Board of Education, the court overturned the
dismissal of a teacher because of critical public comments that were made
regarding a school tax matter. The court backed the teacher up because of his right
to freedom of speech. This leads me to believe that Mrs. Griffin might have not
committed any serious offense by stating her personal feeling.
However, my conclusion is that Mrs.Griffin will be dismissed. Even though we
all have a right to freedom of speech, her statement was racist, hateful, and
disrespectful. It offended many colleagues and by doing so, this created a disruption
in the school environment. Also, in the schools rules and regulations, discrimination
plays a big role. Mrs.Griffin not only violated these rules but can no set a positive
example to her students. In Loeffelman v. Board of Education of the Crystal City
School District, the court ruled to end the contract of a teacher for also making
racial statements, for this matter, I not only agree with the dismissal but have an
actual case to back it up.
References:
Underwood, J. Webb D.L, (2003), School Law For Teachers, pg s 48,49, 58,59,67,68
and 69.
www.caselaw.findlaw.com/mo-court-of-appeals/1109760.html