Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ABSTRACT (In English) Abstrak:: Kata Kunci: Potensi Likuifaksi, Metode Sederhana, Metode P.K. Robertson

    Uploaded by

    Wilham Louhenapessy New
    30 views2 pages
    The understanding of important geological hazards in applying earthquake-resistant design, for the foundation and infrastructure. It also prevents the structure of the post-earthquake effects such as liquefaction events. The Potential Liquefaction refers to the relative resilience of soil to the loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure triggered by the earthquake. This makes the structure could collapse. A Simple Method (Seed Idriss 1971) has been widely used to estimate liquefaction potential by comparing Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) by Cyclic StresRatio (CSR). But it is important to note that the Simple Method (Figure 1) cannot directly address the followings issue on liquefaction: a. The effects of variations in void ratio, b. the percentage variation of fine material (fine material), or c. the influence of soil plasticity (P.K. Robertson 2015). The strategy to solve the problem is to use several additional methods for predicting the depth of liquefaction potential, namely: PK Methods Robertson (Figure 2) and J.W. Bray et al.’s Methods (Figure 3). From here the three (or more) can be compared to see the potential liquefaction in any depth/soil layers. Then the design engineer must make a technical assessment /engineering judgment for a depth that prone to liquefaction. A summary table of all three methods can be made and compared to see liquefaction potentials in any depth. Based on an engineering assessment of this technique, the design length/depths of pile foundation can be decide. There are examples that will be presented and a proposed graph as a conclusion (Fig. 4). [@ The Sumatra Miner 2016]

    Original Title

    ON THE NEW STRATEGIC APPROACH IN POTENTIAL LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT FOR MINING INFRASTRUCTURE (AND OTHER MINING ISSUES)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The understanding of important geological hazards in applying earthquake-resistant design, for the foundation and infrastructure. It also prevents the structure of the post-earthquake effects such as liquefaction events. The Potential Liquefaction refers to the relative resilience of soil to the loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure triggered by the earthquake. This makes the structure could collapse. A Simple Method (Seed Idriss 1971) has been widely used to estimate liquefaction potential by comparing Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) by Cyclic StresRatio (CSR). But it is important to note that the Simple Method (Figure 1) cannot directly address the followings issue on liquefaction: a. The effects of variations in void ratio, b. the percentage variation of fine material (fine material), or c. the influence of soil plasticity (P.K. Robertson 2015). The strategy to solve the problem is to use several additional methods for predicting the depth of liquefaction potential, namely: PK Methods Robertson (Figure 2) and J.W. Bray et al.’s Methods (Figure 3). From here the three (or more) can be compared to see the potential liquefaction in any depth/soil layers. Then the design engineer must make a technical assessment /engineering judgment for a depth that prone to liquefaction. A summary table of all three methods can be made and compared to see liquefaction potentials in any depth. Based on an engineering assessment of this technique, the design length/depths of pile foundation can be decide. There are examples that will be presented and a proposed graph as a conclusion (Fig. 4). [@ The Sumatra Miner 2016]

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views2 pages

    ABSTRACT (In English) Abstrak:: Kata Kunci: Potensi Likuifaksi, Metode Sederhana, Metode P.K. Robertson

    Uploaded by

    Wilham Louhenapessy New
    The understanding of important geological hazards in applying earthquake-resistant design, for the foundation and infrastructure. It also prevents the structure of the post-earthquake effects such as liquefaction events. The Potential Liquefaction refers to the relative resilience of soil to the loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure triggered by the earthquake. This makes the structure could collapse. A Simple Method (Seed Idriss 1971) has been widely used to estimate liquefaction potential by comparing Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) by Cyclic StresRatio (CSR). But it is important to note that the Simple Method (Figure 1) cannot directly address the followings issue on liquefaction: a. The effects of variations in void ratio, b. the percentage variation of fine material (fine material), or c. the influence of soil plasticity (P.K. Robertson 2015). The strategy to solve the problem is to use several additional methods for predicting the depth of liquefaction potential, namely: PK Methods Robertson (Figure 2) and J.W. Bray et al.’s Methods (Figure 3). From here the three (or more) can be compared to see the potential liquefaction in any depth/soil layers. Then the design engineer must make a technical assessment /engineering judgment for a depth that prone to liquefaction. A summary table of all three methods can be made and compared to see liquefaction potentials in any depth. Based on an engineering assessment of this technique, the design length/depths of pile foundation can be decide. There are examples that will be presented and a proposed graph as a conclusion (Fig. 4). [@ The Sumatra Miner 2016]

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    ABSTRACT (In English)

    The understanding of important geological hazards in applying earthquake-resistant


    design, for the foundation and infrastructure. It also prevents the structure of the postearthquake effects such as liquefaction events. The Potential Liquefaction refers to the
    relative resilience of soil to the loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water
    pressure triggered by the earthquake. This makes the structure could collapse. A Simple
    Method (Seed Idriss 1971) has been widely used to estimate liquefaction potential by
    comparing Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) by Cyclic StresRatio (CSR).
    But it is important to note that the Simple Method (Figure 1) cannot directly address the
    followings issue on liquefaction:
    a. The effects of variations in void ratio,
    b. the percentage variation of fine material (fine material), or
    c. the influence of soil plasticity (P.K. Robertson 2015).
    The strategy to solve the problem is to use several additional methods for predicting the
    depth of liquefaction potential, namely: PK Methods Robertson (Figure 2) and J.W. Bray
    et al.s Methods (Figure 3). From here the three (or more) can be compared to see the
    potential liquefaction in any depth/soil layers. Then the design engineer must make a
    technical assessment /engineering judgment for a depth that prone to liquefaction. A
    summary table of all three methods can be made and compared to see liquefaction
    potentials in any depth. Based on an engineering assessment of this technique, the design
    length/depths of pile foundation can be decide.
    There are examples that will be presented and a proposed graph as a conclusion (Fig. 4).
    Keywords: Potential Liquefaction, Simple Method, PK Robertson & Wrides Methods,
    J.W. Bray et al.s Methods, The Length of Pile Foundations.

    ABSTRAK:
    Pemahaman tentang bahaya geologi penting dalam menerapkan desain tahan
    gempa, untuk pondasi dan infrastruktur. Ini juga mencegah struktur dari efek
    pasca-gempa seperti peristiwa likuifaksi. Potensi likuifaksi (potential
    liquefaction) mengacu pada ketahanan relatif tanah sampai hilangnya kekuatan
    tanah karena peningkatan tekanan air pori yang disebabkan oleh gempa. Hal ini
    membuat struktur atas bisa runtuh. Suatu Metode Sederhana (Seed Idriss 1971)
    telah banyak digunakan untuk memperkirakan potensi likuifaksi dengan
    membandingkan Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) dengan Cyclic StresRatio
    (CSR).
    Tetapi penting untuk dicatat bahwa Metode Sederhana (Gambar 1) tidak bisa
    langsung mengatasi efek dari variasi angka pori, variasi persentase material
    halus (fine material), atau pengaruh dari plastisitas tanah tsb. pada likuifaksi
    (P.K. Robertson 2015). Strateginya adalah dengan menggunakan beberapa
    metode tambahan untuk memprediksi potensi kedalaman likuifaksi, yaitu:
    Metode P.K. Robertson (Gambar 2) dan Metode J.W. Bray et.al. (Gambar 3).
    Dari sini ketiganya (atau lebih) dapat dibandingkan kemungkinan Potensi
    Likuifaksi di setiap kedalaman. Lalu Insinyur harus membuat penilaian teknik
    (engineering judgement) pada kedalaman berapa rawan terhadap likuifaksi.
    Sebuah tabel ringkasan dari ketiganya dapat dibuat dan dari perbandigngan
    ketiga metode tsb untuk Potensi likuifaksi di setiap kedalaman. Berdasarkan
    penilaian teknik ini, maka kedalaman pondasi tiang pancang dapat ditentukan.
    Terdapat contoh yang akan disajikan dan sebuah Usulan Grafik sebagai
    kesimpulan (Gambar 4).
    Kata Kunci: Potensi Likuifaksi, Metode Sederhana, Metode P.K. Robertson
    & Wride, Metode J.W. Bray dkk, Panjang Tiang Pondasi

    You might also like