Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wholly artifactual statistical noise. Really, the effect sizes are modest, and although
interactions by sex in exactly the same basic path were noticed for a number of the outcome
measures, only one of these interactions reached significance after the Bonferonni
correction, and one of them was reversed in direction - with women, but not guys,
exposed to primal scenes reporting less use of particular drugs.
Furthermore, while findings of favorable consequences are intriguing, specific findings are
not called by any theory that we understand. Therefore, one is maybe left with what may turn
out to be nonreplicable favorable correlates of the predictors. As Scarr et al. (1990)
Discovered, nonreplicable results is the typical fate for long term regression studies,
Especially when proximate, rather than distal, predictors are being analyzed. In our
Perspective, then, the relevance of the present investigation, apart from the idea of
interactions by sex, lies not so much in positive findings as in the negative findings for
harm - findings that converge on all of the available empirical data. Admittedly, any one
set of negative consequences is not particularly informative. However, given almost no
evidence in this or any other empirical study the behaviours examined in the current
study are unambiguously harmful, the intriguing question becomes: Why is it so widely
believed in America and certain European nations that these practices are
uniformly harmful to the mental health of kids? (See Okami, 1995, for review of
professional and public opinion.) did not say "reintroduce" but "introduce" (See Cardiner,
AAW p. 191). , definitely where exposure to parental
nudity is concerned, are maybe better conceptualized as myths. Whereas any of these