Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.
That the offender compels him to sign, execute, or deliver any public instrument or document.
3.
F. ELEMENTS OF ROBBERY IN AN INHABITED HOUSE OR PUBLIC BUILDING OR EDIFICE DEVOTED TO WORSHIP: (299)
1.
That the offender entered (a) an inhabited house, or (b) public buildings, or (c) edifice devoted to religious worship.
2.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That once inside the building, the offender took personal property belonging to another with intent to gain.
Notes:
1.
2.
Inhabited house any shelter, ship or vessel constituting the dwelling of one or more person even though temporarily absent dependencies, courts,
corals, barns, etc.
3.
4.
Important for robbery by use of force upon things, it is necessary that offender enters the building or where object may be found. NO ENTRY, NO
ROBBERY
5.
Entrance is necessary mere insertion of hand is not enough (whole body); not to get out but to enter therefore, evidence to such effect is
necessary
6.
7.
8.
Public building every building owned, rented or used by the government (though owned by private persons) though temporarily vacant
9.
Not robbery passing through open door but getting out of a window
10. Outside door must be broken, smashed. Theft if lock is merely removed or door was merely pushed
11. False keys genuine keys stolen from the owner or any keys other than those intended by the owner for use in the lock
12. Picklocks specially made, adopted for commission of robbery
13. Key stolen not by force, otherwise, its robbery by violence and intimidation against persons
14. False key used in opening house and not furniture inside, otherwise, theft (for latter to be robbery., must be broken and not just opened)
15. Gen. Rule: outside door. Exception: inside door in a separate dwelling
16. E.g. pretending to be police to be able to enter (not pretending after entrance)
G. ELEMENTS OF ROBBERY WITH FORCE UPON SUBDIVISION (B) OR ART. 299
1.
That the offender is inside a dwelling house, public building, or edifice devoted to religious worship, regardless of the circumstances under which he
entered it
2.
That the offender takes personal property belonging to another with intent to gain, under any of the following circumstances.
1.
by the breaking of doors, wardrobes, chests, or any other kind of locked or sealed furniture or receptacle, or
2.
by taking such furniture or objects away to be broken or forced open outside the place of the robbery.
Notes:
1.
2.
3.
4.
When sealed box is taken out for the purpose of breaking it, no need to open already consummated robbery
5.
6.
WHAT IS AN UNINHABITED HOUSE, PUBLIC BUILDING OR BUILDING DEDICATED TO RELIGIOUS WORSHIP AND THEIR DEPENDENCIES: (301)
Notes:
1.
dependencies are all interior courts, corrals, warehouses, granaries or enclosed places:
1.
2.
3.
That the offender entered an uninhabited place or a building which was not a dwelling house, not a public building, or not an edifice devoted to
religious worship.
2.
3.
That with intent to gain the offender took therefrom personal property belonging to another.
1.
That entrance was effected through an opening not intended for entrance or egress.
2.
3.
The entrance was effected through the use of false keys, picklocks or other similar tools.
4.
A door, wardrobe, chest, or any sealed or closed furniture or receptacle was broken or
5.
A closed or sealed receptacle was removed, even if the same be broken open elsewhere.
Notes:
1.
2.
Uninhabited place is an uninhabited building (habitable, not any of the 3 places mentioned)
3.
4.
Same manner as 299 except that was entered into was an uninhabited place or a building other than the 3 mentioned in 299. Exception: does not
include use of fictitious name or pretending the exercise of public authority
5.
6.
False keys genuine keys stolen from the owner or any other keys other than those intended by the owner for use in the lock forcibly opened
K. ROBBERY OF CEREALS, FRUITS OR FIRE WOOD IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE OR PRIVATE BUILDING: (303)
L. ELEMENTS OF ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS OR SIMILAR TOOLS: (304)
1.
2.
That such picklocks or similar tools are specially adopted to the commission of robbery.
3.
That the offender does not have lawful cause for such possession.
Picklocks, etc.
2.
3.
Any key other than those intended by owner for use in the lock forcibly opened by the offender
Notes:
1.
2.
If key was entrusted and used to steal, not robbery (not stolen)
II. BRIGANDAGE
A. BRIGANDAGE: (306)
Brigands more than three armed persons forming a band
Purpose:
a. Robbery in highway
1.
Presumption of Brigandage:
1.
2.
BRIGANDAGE
ROBBERY IN BAND
2.
3.
1.
2.
he gives them information of the movements of the police or other peace officers of the government or
3.
Notes:
1.
PD 532 brigandage. Seizure of any person for: (a) ransom; (b) extortion or other unlawful purpose; (c) taking away of property by violence or
intimidation or force upon things or other unlawful means
2.
3.
III. THEFT
A. ELEMENTS OF THEFT: (308)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That the taking be accomplished without the use of violence against or intimidation of persons or force upon things.
Persons liable:
1.
Those who
Those who
2.
3.
4.
Those who
Those who
Theft is consummated when offender is able to place the thing taken under his control and in such a situation as he could disclose of it at once
(though no opportunity to dispose) i.e, the control test
2.
P v. Dino applies only in theft of bulky goods (meaning there has to be capacity to dispose of the things). Otherwise, P v. Espiritu full possession
is enough
3.
Servant using car without permission deemed qualified theft though use was temporary
4.
Reyes says: there must be some character of permanency in depriving owner of the use of the object and making himself the owner, therefore must
exclude joyride
5.
Theft: if after custody (only material possession) of object was given to the accused, it is actually taken by him (no intent to return) e.g. felonious
conversion. But it is estafa if juridical possession is transferred e.g., by contract of bailment
6.
2.
7.
8.
Salary must be delivered first to employee; prior to this, taking of Php is theft
9.
If offender claims property as his own (in good faith) not theft (though later found to be untrue. If in bad faith theft)
10. Gain is not just Php satisfaction, use, pleasure desired, any benefit (e.g. joyride)
11. Actual gain is not necessary (intent to gain necessary)
12. Allege lack of consent in info is important
That there is an enclosed estate or a field where trespass is forbidden or which belongs to another;
2.
3.
That the offender hunts or fishes upon the same or gathers fruits, cereals or other forest or farm products, and
4.
That the hunting or fishing or gathering of products is without the consent of the owner.
2.
3.
motor vehicle
2.
mail matter
3.
large cattle
4.
5.
6.
Notes:
1.
2.
3.
4.
qualified: if done by one who has access to place where stolen property is kept e.g., guards, tellers
5.
6.
7.
when accused considered the deed of sale as sham (modus) and he had intent to gain, his absconding is QT
8.
9.
motor vehicle in kabit system sold to another-theft. Motor vehicle not used as PU in kabit system but under K of lease-estafa
10. 10. mail matter private mail to be QT, Not postmaster Art. 226
11. theft of large cattle
E. ELEMENTS OF THEFT OF PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL LIBRARY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM: (311)
IV. USURPATION
A. ELEMENTS OF OCCUPATION OF REAL PROPERTY OR USURPATION OF REAL RIGHTS IN PROPERTY: (312)
1.
That the offender takes possession of any real property or usurps any real rights in property.
2.
3.
That violence against or intimidation of persons is used by the offender in occupying real property or usurpation real rights in property.
4.
1.
That there be boundary marks or monuments of towns, provinces, or estates, or any other marks intended to designate the boundaries of the same.
2.
V. CULPABLE INSOLVENCY
A. ELEMENTS OF FRAUDULENT INSOLVENCY: (314) (culpable insolvency)
1.
That the offender is a debtor; that is, he was obligations due and payable.
2.
3.
That the accused defrauded another (a.) by abuse of confidence, or (b) or means of deceit and
2.
That damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation is caused to the offended party or third person
2.
3.
C. ELEMENTS OF ESTAFA WITH ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE UNDER SUBDIVISION NO.1 PAR. (B), OF ART.315
1.
That money, goods, or other personal property be received by the offender in trust, or on commission, or for administration, or under any other
obligation involving the duty to make delivery of or to return, the same.
2.
That there be misappropriation or conversion of such money or property by the offender, or dental on his part of such receipt.
3.
4.
D. 2ND ELEMENT OF ESTAFA WITH ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE UNDER PARAGRAPH (B), SUBDIVISION N0.1, ART. 315 = 3 WAYS OF COMMITTING:
1.
2.
3.
Notes:
1.
1.
1.
thing is received by offender under transactions transferring juridical possession, not ownership
2.
under PD 115 (Trust Receipts Law) failure to turn over to the bank the proceeds of the sale of the goods covered by TR Estafa
3.
same thing received must be returned otherwise estafa; sale on credit by agency when it was to be sold for cash estafa
4.
5.
Novation must take place before criminal liability was incurred or perhaps prior to the filing of the criminal information in court by state prosecutors
6.
g. Converting act of using or disposing of anothers property as if it was ones own; thing has been devoted for a purpose or use different from that agreed
upon
1.
There must be prejudice to another not necessary that offender should obtain gain
2.
When in the prosecution for malversation the public officer is acquitted, the private individual allegedly in conspiracy with him may be held liable for
estafa
9.
Partners No estafa of money or property received for the partnership when the business is commercial and profits accrued. BUT if property is
received for specific purpose and is misappropriated estafa!
Malversation
That the paper with the signature of the offended party be in blank.
2.
3.
That above the signature of the offended party a document is written by the offender without authority to do so.
4.
That the document so written creates a liability of, or causes damage to, the offended party or any third person.
Note: If the paper with signature in blank was stolen Falsification if by making it appear that he participated in a transaction when in fact he did not so
participate.
F. ELEMENTS OF ESTAFA BY MEANS OF DECEIT: (315)
1.
that there must be a false pretense, fraudulent means must be made or executed prior to or
2.
That such false pretense, fraudulent act or fraudulent means must be made or executed prior to or simultaneously with the commission of the fraud.
3.
That the offended party must have relied on the false pretense, fraudulent act, or fraudulent means, that is, he was induced to part with his money or
property because of the false pretense, fraudulent act, or fraudulent means.
4.
Notes:
1.
False pretenses or fraudulent acts executed prior to or simultaneously with delivery of the thing by the complainant
2.
There must be evidence that the pretense of the accused that he possesses power/influence is false.
2.
That such postdatig or issuing a check was done when the offender had no funds in the bank or his funds deposited therein were not sufficient to
cover the amount of the check.
Notes:
1.
2.
dishonor from lack of funds to prima facie evidence of deceit or failure to make good within three days after notice of.
3.
4.
5.
Offender must be able to obtain something from the offended party by means of the check he issues and delivers
6.
2.
That the check is made or drawn and issued to apply on account or for value.
3.
That the person who makes or draws and issues the check knows at the time of issue that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the
drawee bank for the payment of such check in full upon its presentment.
1.
That the check is subsequently dishonored by the drawee bank for insufficiency of funds or credit, or would have been
dishonored for the same reason had not the drawee, without any valid reason, ordered the bank to stop payment.
Note: Failure to make good within 5 banking days prima facie evidence of knowledge of lack and insufficiency
I. ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE DEFINED IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF SECTION 1: BP 22
1.
That a person has sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank when he makes or draws and issues a check.
2.
That he fails to keep sufficient funds or to maintain a credit to cover the full amount of the check if presented within
Note: Failure to make good within 5 banking days prima facie evididence of knowledge of lack and insufficiency
J. BY OBTAINING FOOD OR CREDIT AT HOTELS, INNS, RESTAURANTS ETC.
K. ELEMENTS OF ESTAFA BY INDUCING ANOTHER TO SIGN ANY DOCUMENTS: (315)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Note: If offended party willingly signed the document and there was deceit as to the character or contents of the document falsification; but where the accused
made representation to mislead the complainants as to the character of the documents estafa
L. ELEMENTS OF ESTAFA BY REMOVING, CONCEALING OR DESTROYING DOCUMENTS: (315)
1.
That there be court records, office files, documents or any other papers.
2.
3.
The offender party being deprived of his money or property, as a result of the defraudation.
2.
3.
Temporary prejudice.
N. ELEMENTS OF SWINDLING (PAR.1) BY CONVEYING, SELLING, ENCUMBERING, OR MORTGAGING ANY REAL PROPERTY, PRETENDING TO BE
THE OWNER OF THE SAME: (316)
1.
2.
That the offender who is not the owner of said property represented that he is the owner thereof.
3.
That the offender should have executed an act of ownership (selling, leasing, encumbering or mortgaging the real property).
4.
That the act be made to the prejudice of the owner or a third person.
ESTAFA
Intent to defraud
No intent to defraud
O. ELEMENTS OF SWINDLING (PAR. 2) BY DISPOSING OF REAL PROPERTY AS FREE FROM ENCUMBRANCE, ALTHOUGH SUCH ENCUMBRANCE BE
NOT RECORDED: (316)
1.
2.
That the offender knew that the real property was encumbered, whether the encumbrance is recorded or not.
3.
That there must be express representation by the offender that the real property is free from encumbrance.
4.
That the act of disposing of the real property be made to the damage of another.
P. ELEMENTS OF SWINDLING (PAR.3) BY WRONGFULLY TAKING BY THE OWNER HIS PERSONAL FROM ITS LAWFUL POSSESSOR: (316)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Q. ELEMENTS OF SWINDLING (PAR. 6) BY SELLING, MORTGAGING OR ENCUMBERING REAL PROPERTY OR PROPERTIES WITH WHICH THE
OFFENDER GUARANTEED THE FULFILLMENT OF HIS OBLIGATION AS SURETY: (316)
1.
2.
That he guaranteed the fulfillment of such obligation with his real property or properties.
3.
That he sells, mortgages, or, in any other manner encumbers said real property.
4.
That such sale, mortage or encumbrance is (a) without express authority from the court, or (b) made before the cancellation of his bond, or (c) before
being relieved from the obligation contracted by him.
That the offender takes advantage of the inexperience or emotions or feelings of a minor.
2.
That he induces such minor (a) ro assume an obligation, or (b) to give release, or (c) to execute a transfer of any property right.
3.
That the consideration is (a) some loan of money (b) credit or (c) other personal property.
4.
2.
That personal property is already pledged under the terms of the chattel mortgage law.
2.
That the offender, who is the mortgagee of such property, sells or pledges the same or any part thereof.
3.
That there is no consent of the mortgagee written on the back of the mortgage and noted on the record thereof in the office of the register of deeds.
2.
3.
That he removes such mortgaged personal to any province or city other than the one in which it was located at the time of the execution of the
mortgage.
4.
5.
That there is no written consent of the mortgagee or his executors, administration or assigns to such removal.
That an uninhabited hut, storehouse, barn, shed or any other property is burned
2.
That the value of the property burned does not exceed 25 pesos
3.
That the burning was done at a time or under circumstances which clearly exclude all danger of the fire spreading
2.
1.
explosion
2.
3.
inundation
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
2.
That the purpose of the offender in doing so was to commit arson or to cause a great destruction
3.
D. ELEMENTS OF ARSON
1.
2.
That (a) the purpose of the offender is burning it is to defraud or cause damage to another or (b) prejudice is actually caused, or (c) the thing burned
is a building in an inhabited place
2.
That such act does not constitute arson or other crimes involving destruction.
3.
That the act damaging anothers property be committed merely for the sake of damaging it.
Notes:
1.
Malicious mischief willful damaging of anothers property for the sake of causing damage due to hate, revenge or other evil motive
2.
No negligence
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
2.
3.
4.
Damage to property of national museum or library, archive, registry, waterworks, road, promenade, or any other thing ised in common by the public.
1.
2.
done by damaging railways, telegraph, telephone lines, electric wires, traction cables, signal system of railways
2.
3.
not applicable when telegraph/phone lines dont pertain to railways (example: for transmission of electric power/light)
4.
5.
circumstance qualifying the offense if the damage shall result in any derailment of cars, collision or other accident a higher penalty shall be
imposed
1.
2.
none art 48
2.
The widowed spouse with respect to the property w/c belonged to the deceased spouse before the same passed into the possession of another
3.
Theft
2.
Swindling
3.
Malicious mischief
Notes:
1.
2.
Parties to the crime not related to the offended party still remains criminally liable
3.
TITLE ELEVEN
1.
2.
3.
concubine/paramour (spouse)
4.
2.
That she has sexual intercourse with a man not her husband.
3.
That as regards the man with whom she has sexual intercourses, he must know her to be married.
Notes:
1.
mitigated if wife was abandoned without justification by the offended spouse (man is not entitled to this mitigating circumstance)
2.
2.
3.
1.
2.
Having sexual intercourse under scandalous circumstances with a woman who is not his wife.
3.
Note: Scandal consists in any reprehensible word/deed that offends public conscience, redounds to the detriment of the feelings of honest persons and gives
occasions to the neighbors spiritual damage and ruin
C. ELEMENTS OF ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS: (336)
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
Seduction of a virgin over 12 and under 18 years of age by certain persons, such as a person in authority, priest, teachers etc and
2.
Seduction of a sister by her brother or descendant by her ascendant, regardless of her age or reputation (incestuous seduction)
Elements:
1.
That the offended party is a virgin, which is (presumed if she unmarried and of good reputation.)
2.
3.
4.
That there is abuse of authority, confidence or relationship on the part of the offender ( person entrusted with education or custody of victim; person
in public authority, priest; servant)
Persons liable:
1.
2.
2.
guardian
3.
teacher
4.
person who, in any capacity, is entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced
3.
1.
priest
2.
house servant
3.
domestic
2.
2.
3.
4.
2.
That the acts are committed upon a woman who is virgin or single or widow of good reputation, under 18 years of age but over 12 years, or a sister
or descendant regardless of her reputation or age.
3.
that the offender accomplishes the acts by abuse of authority, confidence, relationship, or deceit.
That the person abducted is any woman, regardless of her age, civil status, or reputation.
2.
3.
2.
3.
That the taking away of the offended party must be with her consent, after solicitation or cajolery from the offender.
4.
That the taking away of the offended party must be with lewd designs.
K. PROSECUTION OF ADULTERY, CONCUBINAGE, SEDUCTION, ABDUCTION RAPE AND ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS (344)
1.
Adultery and concubinage must be prosecuted upon complaint signed by the offended spouse
2.
Seduction, abduction, rape or acts of lasciviousness must be prosecuted upon complaint signed by:
1.
offended party
2.
by her parents
3.
grandparents
4.
Note: Marriage of the offender with the offended party extinguishes the criminal action or remit the penalty already imposed upon him. This applies as well to the
accomplices, accessories-after-the-fact. But marriages must be in good faith. This rule does not apply in case of multiple rape.
L. Civil liability of persons guilty of rape, seduction or abduction (345)
1.
2.
To acknowledge the offspring, unless the law should prevent him from doing so
3.
M. LIABILITY OF ASCENDANTS, OTHER PERSONS ENTRUSTED WITH CUSTODY OF OFFENDED PARTY WHO BY ABUSE OF AUTHORITY OR
CONFIDENCE SHALL COOPERATE AS ACCOMPLIES: (346)
TITLE TWELVE
CRIMES AGAINST THE CIVIL STATUS OF PERSONS
A. SIMULATION OF BIRTHS, SUBSTITUTION OF ONE CHILD FOR ANOTHER, AND CONCEALMENT OR ABANDONMENT OF A LEGITIMATE CHILD:
(347)
Acts Punished:
1. Simulation of births
2. Substitution of one child for another
3. Concealing or abandoning any legitimate child with the intent to cause such child to lose its civil status
Requisites:
1.
2.
3.
The offender has the intent to cause the child to lose its civil status
2.
3.
Actors purpose was to cause the loss of any trace as to the childs true filiation
Committed by a person who represents himself as another and assumes the filiation or rights pertaining to such person
2.
There must be criminal intent to enjoy the civil rights of another by the offender knowing he is not entitled thereto
3.
4.
Circumstances qualifying the offense: penalty is heavier when the purpose of the impersonation is to defraud the offended party or hios heirs.
2.
That the marriage has not been legally dissolved or, in case his or her spouse is absent, the absent spouse could not yet be presumed dead
according to the civil code.
3.
4.
That the second or subsequent marriage has all the essential requisites for validity.
Notes:
1.
The crime does not fall within the category of private crimes that can be prosecuted only at the instance of the offended party
2.
A simulated marriage is not marriage at all and can be used as a defense for bigamy
3.
There must be a summary proceeding to declare the absent spouse presumptively dead for purposes of remarriage
4.
Failure to exercise due diligence to ascertain the whereabouts of the 1st wife is bigamy through reckless imprudence
5.
6.
One convicted for bigamy may be prosecuted for concubinage as both are distinct offenses
7.
One who vouches that there is no legal impediment knowing that one of the parties is already married is an accomplice.
2.
2.
Note: Circumstance qualifying the offense: if either of the contracting parties obtains the consent of the other by means of violence, intimidation or fraud.
E. ELEMENTS OF PREMATURE MARRIAGE: (351)
Acts punished:
1.
A widow who within 301 days from death of husband, got married or before her delivery, if she was pregnant at the time of his death
2.
A woman whose marriage having been dissolved or annulled, married before her delivery or within 301 days after the legal separation.
That there must be an imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstances.
2.
3.
4.
That the imputation must be directed at a natural or juridical person, or one who is dead.
5.
That the imputation must tend to cause the dishonor, discredit or contempt of the person defamed.
Notes:
1.
Libel is a public and malicious imputation of a crime, or a vice or defect, real or imaginary or any act, commission, condition, status or circumstances
tending to cause the dishonor, discredit or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead
2.
3.
4.
5.
Person libeled must be identified. But the publication need not refer by name to the libeled party. If not named it must be shown that the description of
the person referred to in the defamatory publication was sufficiently clear so that at least a 3rd person would have identified the plaintiff.
6.
7.
To presume publication there must be a reasonable probability that the alleged a libelous matter was thereby exposed to be read or seen by
3rd persons.
Perjury
Newsweek v IAC
Newsweek portrayed the island province of Negros Occidental as a place dominated by big landowners. Plaintiffs are associations of sugarcane planters.
HELD: Dismissed. To maintain a libel suit, the specific victim must be identifiable. Defamatory remarks directed at a group of persons are not actionable unless
the statements are all-embracing or sufficiently specific for victim to be identifiable. An action for libel allegedly directed against a group of sugar planters cannot
be done by resort to filing a class suit as each victim has his specific reputation to protect. In this case, each of the plaintiffs has a separate and distinct
reputation in the community.
A. REQUIREMENT OF PUBLICITY: (354)
Kinds of privileged communication
1.
Absolutely privileged not actionable even if the actor has acted in bad faith
2.
Qualifiedly privileged those which although containing defamatory imputations could not be actionable unless made with malice or bad faith
General Rule:
Every defamatory imputation is presumed malicious even if it be true, if no good intention and justifiable motive for making it is shown
Exception:
1.
Requisites:
1.
that the person who made the communication had a legal, moral or social duty to make the communication or at least he had an interest to be upheld
2.
that the communication is addressed to an officer or a board, or superior, having some interest or duty on the matter
3.
that the statements in the communication are made in good faith without malice in fact
4.
fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments and remarks
Requisites:
1.
that the publication of a report of an official proceeding is a fair and true report of a judicial, legislative, or other official proceedings which are not of
confidential nature, or of a statement, report, or speech delivered in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by a public officer
2.
3.
Santos v CA
HELD: No malice, he simply furnished the readers with the info that a complaint has been filed against the brokerage firm and reproduced the pleading verbatim
with no embellishments.
C. THREATENING TO PUBLISH LIBEL AND OFFER TO PREVENT SUCH PUBLICATION FOR A COMPENSATION: (356)
Note: Clearly, just a case of blackmail-any unlawful extortion of money by threats of accusation and exposure
-possible in light threats Art 283 and in threat to publish Art 356.
D. ELEMENTS OF PROHIBITED PUBLICATION OF ACTS REFERRED TO IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS: (357)
1.
2.
3.
That such facts are offensive to the honor, virtue and reputation of said person.
Note:
Even though made in connection with or under the pretext that it is necessary in the narration of any judicial or administrative proceedings wherein such facts
have been mentioned.
Lacsa v IAC
Lacsa found that Marquez was not a proprietary member of PCA thus not qualified to be president. He wrote to the BOD and to Marquez. He caused to publish
the second letter. HELD: Letter is not privileged communication. To be classified as such it must be free from malice. Granting that the letter was privileged
communication, written out of a duty of an officer towards the members, such character was lost when it was published.
2.
That the offender performs any act not included in any other crime against honor.
2.
3.
That such act casts dishonor, discredit or contempt upon the offended party.
Notes:
a. Seriousness depends on the social standing of offended party, the circumstances surrounding the act, the occasion, etc.
b. The acts of slapping and boxing the woman, a teacher, in the presence of many people has put her to dishonor, contempt and ridicule. (P v Costa)
P v Motita
Accused held a mirror between the legs of complainant to reflect her private parts. The crowd laughed. Guilty of slander by deed.
Distinctions:
a. Unjust Vexation-irritation or annoyance/anything that annoys or irritates without justification.
Note: Offended party must file complaint for defamation imputing a crime which cannot be prosecuted de oficio (e.g. adultery, concubinage, rape, seduction,
abduction, and acts of lasciviousness)
Soriano v IAC
The Philippines follows the multiple publication rule which means that every time the same written matter is communicated, such communication is considered a
distinct and separate publication of libel.
Notes: The proof of the truth of the accusation cannot be made to rest upon mere hearsay, rumors, or suspicion. It must rest upon positive direct evidence, upon
which a definite finding may be made by the court (US v Sotto)
2.
That by such act he directly incriminates or imputes to an innocent person the commission of a crime.
3.
Two Kinds:
a. making a statement which is
i. defamatory or
ii. perjurious (if made under oath and is false)
b. planting evidence
Note: article is limited to planting evidence and the like
An extension phone is not one of those prohibited under RA 4200. There must be either a physical interruption through the wiretap or the deliberate installation
of a device or arrangement in order to overhear, intercept or record the spoken words. The extension phone was not installed for such purpose.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That there is inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the offender, taking into consideration
1.
2.
3.
2.
That the damage impending to be caused in not immediate or the danger is not clearly manifest.
Notes:
1) Art.64 on mitigating and aggravating circumstances not applicable.
2) Failure to lend on the spot assistance to victim of his negligence:penalty next higher in degree.
3) Abandoning usually punishable under Art 275, if charged under Art365 is only qualifying and if not alleged cannot even be an aggravating circumstance.
4) Contributory negligencenot a defense, only mitigating
P v Cano
Negligence is a quasi-offense. What is punished is not the effect of the negligence but the recklessness of the accused.
P v Carillo
13 yr old girl dies 3 days after surgery due to an overdose of Nubain which triggered a heart attack that caused brain damage. HELD: Guilty of simple
negligence resulting to homicide. Carillo was the anesthesiologist, he and his co-accused failed to monitor and provide close patient care, to inform the parents
of the childs true condition, to prove that they exercised necessary and appropriate degree of care and diligence to prevent the condition.
Buearano v CA
Conviction of the accused in the charge of slight and less serious physical injuries through reckless imprudence constitutes double jeopardy to the charge of the
crime of damage to property through reckless imprudence.