Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APR 22 2005
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
-2-
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
-3-
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
these appeals.
See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cases are
-4-
district court reviewed the record de novo, and adopted the magistrate judges
recommendation in full.
Appellants arguments on appeal are incomprehensible. Based on our
review of the district court record, we AFFIRM, as we find no fault with the
magistrate judges analysis, as adopted by the district court. We observe that
appellants did not assert error with the imposition of filing restrictions and,
therefore, this court will enforce those restrictions.
Appellees motion to consolidate the appeals is granted. Appellants
motion to file a substitute reply brief is denied. Appellants other outstanding
motionsincluding appellants motion filed on April 13, 2005, asking this court to
invite the Department of Justice to investigate the magistrate judge, the district
court, and defense counselare denied as moot or as frivolous and meritless.
Terrence L. OBrien
Circuit Judge
-5-