Professional Documents
Culture Documents
29-84
PROGRAM: CRTS3D.WK1
SHIP: High-SDeed Displacement Hull
1E-4
30
25
- -
Cr
--
Cf
2O
10
~'~
_ ~
0
0.4
0.6
0.8
///
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
V/L'0.5
29
2.4
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Ever since human beings invented the first floating vessel,
minimum resistance with desirable stability and cargo capacity
has been a practical problem for ship designers. Due to the
complexity of fluid motion and the free surface interaction with
vessels operating on the air-water interface, a reliable resistance
prediction technique is always desirable to naval architects.
Resistance prediction in an absolute sense has been available only
since the second part of the 19th century. However, resistance
measurement based on model testing for hull form improvements
can be traced back to the 15th century. Qualitative resistance
prediction for full scale ships eventually materialized when
William Froude formulated his model-ship expansion hypothesis.
Since then, numerous model tests were conducted and expanded
to full scale according to Froudc's hypothesis. Early in the
twentieth century, Michcll, Havelock, and Wiglcy, ct. al.,
advanced the theoretical prediction of resistance in wavcs.
Despite the substantial research in theoretical hydrodynamics,
theoretical solutions in resistance prediction and hull form
optimization have eluded naval architects. Particularly in early
stage design, hull form development and powering prediction are
still largely based on inspection or statistical analysis on
historical data. This paper attempts to provide a better solution
on ship powering prediction through an criticalevaluation on past
performance on regression analysis.
NOMENCLATURE
DL
= Displacement-length ratio
DP
= Propeller diameter, ft
EHP(BH)
EHP(APP)
= EHP o f appendages
EHlrf
= Total EHP
1~
= ~
IB
IE
IR
ITrc
= Form factor
@K
Lee
LcF
LwL
= ~ O L
PI
= 3.1415926
RAW
Bx
= Thrust, lb
B2o
TA
Tx
Ao
A=
Ax
BA
sq-fi
<t~
Number o f p r o p e l l e r s
= Constant
"IT
CA
TW
T20
CD(APP)
Cp
= Prismatic coefficient
WCF
= W o r m curve factor
CR
W.S.
CRn
= Speed, knots
CT
= P r o p e l l e r thrust-loading coefficient
VOL
= Volume, fP
CTL
CT0.o~
Cwp
CS
CWS
Cx
DDS
Disp
Towing Tanks
30
DTMB
EMB
NNHL
SSET
31
OCUST(1959)
DDCR (1984)
SABIT (1972)
AUGHEY(1983)
FUNG[PRESENT]
BT
BT
8T
BA
BT
C0"1P1'2
CP
6A
BA
B'~P
CLX
BT*CP
GA^2
BT~H
CO*TA
CV
BT
BT
BT"2
CP
BT*CP"2
BT
9T*C8
(2*IE)*TA
CV"CP
CP
CP
BT"2tCP
CPE
BT"2
8T*CS
9T'2
(2"IE)"O.5
CV*CP"2
CX
Ck'S
CP
CPVE
BT"2*CP
BT^2
(:8
(2*IE)"O.5*CD
CV*IE
DL
CX
CP"2
CPVR
BT^2*CP"2
CP
C8"2
( 2*IE)"O,5*TA
CV*IE'0.5
TA
DL
CX
CX
CP
CP"2
FB
Tr
[E
FB
FB
CP"2
CS*CP
FB*BT
Oil
CV*IE'3
1~
TA
]0
FB*CP
DL
CS"2
FB"CB
I~,P(Z*IE)"0.5
CV*IE~4
I/BT
TK"2
II
FB*CP"2
IE
OL*CP
CS"2*CP"2
F'B~"2
CV*IE"5
ZlCP
TT
12
FB'2
LB
DL~'CP"2
CX
FB"2
IItI*TA"2
CV*TA
I/CX
TW
13
FB^2*CP
LX/L
DL^2
CX
~4
TA
cV~rA~FB
I/DL
"RP2
IIM*C8
TA"2
14
FB~Z*CP'2
~H
OL~2*CP
CX*IR
CV*TA*F"B*CP
[JBT
15
IE
x15
OL^2"CP"2
CX'~'A
CV*TA"0.5
I/CP
16
IE*CP
x16
FB
CX*TT
CV*TA^2
I/CX
17
]E*CP"2
x17
FB*CP
CX'2
ClarA'4,5
lJOL
18
IE*I.B
X18
FB"CP"2
DL
CV*TA'5
1lIE
19
IE*LB^2
F'B~2
DLtCS
CV'0.25
20
IE^2
FB^2*CP
DL*TA
CV~O.5*CP
21
IE^2*CP
FB^2*CP^2
DL*Tr
CV^0.5~CP"0.5
22
IE'2*CP"2
IE
DL"2
CV"O.5"FB
23
IE'2*LB
IE*CP
0L^2"CS'2
CV"O.5*FB
24
IE*2*LB'2
IE*CP"2
FB
CY~O.5*FB~
25
I.B
IE'q.8
FB'2
CV"0.5"F8^3
26
LB*CP
IE*LB^2
FB*2*TT
CV"O. G*FB^5
27
LS*CP"2
IE^2
IB
CY"O.StF6~6
28
LB"2
IE"2*CP
IB*TA
CV"0,5*IE
29
LB^2*CP
IE"2*CP'2
1B*'11#
CV"O.50
30
LB~2*CP^2
IE"2*LB
IB^2
CV"O.75
31
IE^2*I.B^2
IB"2*TA
CV"2
32
LB
18~2"TA"2
CV"2*CP"2
33
LB*CP
IE
CW2*TA"O.5
34
LB*CP"2
IE*IB
CV^2.25
35
LB^2
IE*TA
CV^3
36
LB~2*CP
IE*IlV
CV^4
37
LB^2*CP"2
IE"2
CV'4.5
38
TA
IR
FB
39
TA"CP
IR*CP
FB*CP*TA
40
TA*CP"2
IR^2
FB^2*CP'-2*TA"2
41
TA^2
LB
FB'3
42
TA^2*CP
LB*BT'2
[E
43
TA^2"CP"2
LB'I)L
IE^0.5
44
nd
1.6.7i"
TAmP
45
"RPCP
LB^2*BT
TA"CF~
46
T~CP^2
LBA2*CP^2
TA-'CP^3
47
T1~'2
TA
TA%'W3
48
TI~2*Cp
TA"CP
TA'FB
49
"rlt'-Z*Cp^2
TA^2
TA*FB^3
5O
TT
TA*IE
51
TT"Z
TA*IE'! .5
52
TA"2
53
TM"2
TAA3
32
33
34
Transom Effect on
Residuary Resistance
Cr-E-3
3.5
/
2.5
/.~jJ
1.5
1
0.5
0.65
I - - TA-O.O00
Ship:
0.9
0.95
and "DDCR"
Resistance and
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
V/LWL'0.5
TA-0.028 i
- - TA-O.011
Crusier
Stern
2.10 "APSR"
j /
j /
Small
Transom
M~i~
Transom
TA:
0.Oll
0.028
71V:
0.243
0.3!10
DL :
116.0
125.0
124.8
Cp :
0.604
0.626
0.577
Bx/Tx:
2.500
2.793
3.720
Powering
35
Bx/Tx, Cp, and Cx). Instead, all five of these parameters were
included in the froal regression model of the DDCR. Despite the
significant difference between these two programs, both were
reportedly able to achieve comparable correlation with model test
results.
3.0 GENERAL REVIEW OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS
TECHNIQUE
Numerous statistical resistance and performance prediction
approaches have been investigated over the past 35 years. Only
those predictions with significant impact on this study were
reviewed in the previous section. A general review of their
general statistical approaches is provided as follow:
(1) The selections of primary independent variables were quite
often subject to the judgment of the specific researchers or even
other researchers' suggestions. A selection process based on
thorough correlation analysis was seldom performed.
(2) The prevalence of cross-coupling terms in regression
analysis was basically used to explain the inter-relationship
between variables, or used as additional terms in a regression
model to minimize the residual error. Except for Lin (1984), and
Aughey (1983), most researchers did not perform significant tests
on their cross-coupling terms.
(3) High-order polynomial terms were quite often applied to the
primary (linear) independent variables. Correlation analyses for
these high-order terms with the dependent variable were often
omitted. Most researchers apparently did not realize that
insignificant linear regression terms could become significant in
a quadratic model. Those high-order terms often produce high
playback values. However, instability exists and bias occurs
when they have to serve as predictors.
(4) Large numbers of independent variables were frequently
used to formulate a regression model. Except for Mercier (1973)
and Aughey (1983), residual analysis versus number of terms in
a regression model was not conducted by roost researchers. It is
interesting to note that even though the databases of Mercier
(1973) and Aughey (1983) were significantly different, the
improvement of residual error started to stagnate after l0 to 15
terms.
(5) It has been realized that the existence of humps and hollows
made it difficult to model the speed-power curve using simple
mathematical expression.
Multiple or multiple step-wise
regression analyses of resistance over a discrete speed regimes,
therefore, was preferable.
With the exception of Neal,
Oortmerssen, and Holtrop, their regression models were primarily
speed-dependent. The ability to duplicate the true humps and
hollows from either Neal's high-order polynomial curve-fitting
routine or Holtrop's statistically based wave-roaking analyses is
still rather inconclusive. The only exception was Jin's reanalysis
on his first study (1980). Jin's second study was applicable to
high-speed, round bilge hulls for a speed range of Froude
Number values from 0.3 to 1.0. The success of Jin's second
study could be attributed to the pronounced wave-making and
rather flat resistance curve in the high-speed regime.
(6) The selection of independent and dependent variables in a
ship hull resistance regression analysis model should be
established in a "cause and effect" relationship. If the individual
cause (e.g., hull form parameters) could be identified, then the
next step is to compile a set of independent variables which is
free from error. This statement could be extended to mean
"relatively free from error" as compared to the error in the
dependent data which were the subject of the study (Day, 1955).
However, if both the dependent and independent variables were
measured, or the independent variables were related to some form
of predictions, there would definitely be an error in determining
36
this author. Other than the fullness of the hull form, ship length
is another factor which has significant impact on the model-ship
correlation coefficient (CA) (Hagen, 1983). The uncertainties on
form factor (k) and CA render a regression model that used total
resistance as dependent variable to rely on a more complex
mathematical model. Recently, non-dimensional residuary or
wave making coefficient (CR, Cw) has been widely accepted in
statistically based resistance analysis. The only disadvantage of
using CR or Cw is its dependence on wetted surface which is a
function of speed. CR without the form factor correction can be
used as the dependent variable if the two-dimensional, model-ship
expansion technique is still acknowledged; this approach should
not be used for high-speed ships (planing or the high end of
semi-planing) or ships with excessive fullness. Improper
selection of dependent variables can affect the prediction
accuracy of a regression model'.
" For example (Fung, 1988) endeavored to find a systematic means for
"worm curve factor" (the ratio of residuary resistance per unit
displacement between a ship and its equivalent Taylor Standard Series
hull) prediction. However, the generation of the Taylor Standard Series
residuary resistance charts heavily relied on human interpretation (e.g.,
extensive cross faring, assumption on tank temperature ... etc).
Therefore, "worm curve factor" cannot be considered as purely derived
from physics; using "worm curve factor" as a dependent variable in this
regard may cause the regression model to fail to develop a "cause and
effect" relationship. Caution in using worm curve factor as a dependent
variables can be found in (Aughey, 1988).
37
(1)
where,
a0, al, and a2: regression coefficient
P: hull form parameter
With respect to the secondary hull form parameters (TA, TW,
and BA), a simple linear form (CTL = al*P + a0) was used.
Good agreement was achieved in (Aughey, 1983) when compared
with a much more complicated regression model (Lin, 1984).
The formulation from (Aughey, 1983) also provides direct
guidance on parameter values for hull form optimization.
Obviously, the validity of the derived optimum hull form
parameter from any regression model relies heavily on the
reliability of the data representation by the postulated equation.
The other advantage of equation (1) is that change of slope of its
ordinate decreases as its abscissa increases. This could be
interpreted as relatively safe for interpolation when compared
with regression models composed mainly of high-order or crosscoupled terms. The only drawback of equation (1) is its invalid
application for any independent variable which possesses a "zero"
value. Nevertheless, the suggested regression model from
(Aughey, 1983) does offer a good starting point for this paper.
38
DL
LWL/Bx Bx/Tx
Cp
Cx
1E
TA
TW
TT
FB
BA
..............................................................................................................................
DL
CWS
Cwp
1,000
L~/Bx
-0.755
1,000
Bx/Tx
0.158
-0.538
1,000
Cp
-0.120
0.134
0.067
1.000
[ Cx
0.380
-0.331
0.130
-0.103
1.000
18
0.591
-0.599
0.408
0.328
0.124
TA
-0.158
0.361
-0.156
0.390
-0.284
-0.066
1.000
TW
0.049
0.039
-0.031
0.383
-0.158
0.250
0.673
1.000
'IT
-0.085
0.250
-0.143
0.435
-0.017
0.043
0.798
0.607
1.000
FB
-0.133
0.294
-0.081
0.207
-0.242
-0.181
0.817
0,510
0.590
BA
0.035
-0.055
-0.036
-0.215
0.332
-0,248
-0.212
-0.176
-0.153
-0.262
1.000
Ct4S
0.152
-0.314
0.527
0.060
-0.208
0.280
0.217
0.339
-0,018
0.189
-0.015
l.O00
Cwp
0.096 -0.041
0.085
0.650 -0.062
0.417
0.233
0.645
0.194
0.069 -0.174
..............................................................................................................................
0.306
1.000
1.000
1.000
TOTAL OBSERVATIONS:
529
.................................................................................
DL
Ll~./Bx
8x/Tx
Cp
.................................................................................
H OF CASES
CX
529
529
529
529
529
HINIHUH
14,997
3.396
2,000
0.531
0.555
HAXIHUH
300.525
10.265
5.232
0.716
0.994
RANGE
285.528
14,869
3.233
0.185
0.438
HEAN
58.143
9.(~52
3.329
0.619
0.801
STANDARD OEV
29.972
1.617
0.490
0.031
0.077
1.303
0.070
0.021
0.001
0.003
STD, ERROR
IE
TA
TT
BA
.................................................................................
529
529
529
524
529
HINIH1JH
N OF CASES
2.000
O.O~X)
0.000
0.000
0.000
HAXIRLg4
31.730
0.405
1.000
0.440
0.149
RANGE
29.730
0.405
1.000
0.440
O. 149
PLEAN
9.140
O,095
O.507
0.188
0.013
STANDARO DEV
3.176
0.093
0.230
0.098
0.027
5TD. ERROR
0.138
0,004
0.010
0.004
0.001
F8
N OF CASES
Cwp
CWS
520
27G
529
HIHIRUH
0.474
0.673
14.324
14AXIHL~I
0.566
0.837
20,350
RANGE
0.091
O. 164
6.027
HEAN
0.516
0.761
15.819
5TARDARD OEV
0.018
0.034
rJ.G47
STO. ERROR
0,001
0,002
0.028
39
In
m.I ~
I 0.5-2.3 I
0.34
I
0.56
I
0.70
I
0.09
I
0.~0
I
1.56
I
1.1o
I
1.2o
I
1.34
......................................................................................................................................................................................
0.777
II~
1 I -0.11~ I 22
0.164 14 I 0.364 11 I o.4~
8
0.594
3
0.093
I 0.777
2 I 0.862
1
0.931
2 I DL*IE
0.740
21 - 0 . m I 24
0.187 12
0.442
8J
o..~
2
0.672
1
0.744
1
0,820
2
0.857
1l
o.m
5 I l/ts
0,756
31 -0.2~115
0.112 17
0.354 12 J 0.470 I1
0.572
4
0.560
5
0,737
3 I 0.787 3
0.326
4 I o~,~.e
0,667
41 -0.097 I 23
O.lb-/ 13
0.621 14 I O.437 13
0.549
5
0.6d~ 4
0,725
5 I o.7ss
4
0.803
511(
0,621
5 I -0.276 14
0.149 15
0.416 1o I 0.522 8
0,034
2
0.709
2
0.737
4 I 0.661
S
0.644
sit8
0.573
6 I 0.447 10
0.039 21
-0.190 21 I -o.3oo 20
.0.414
14
.0.523
8
-0.584
7 I .0.~
7
-0.673
7 I l/r,
0.568
7 I 0.344 12
0.056 25
-0.100 2O I .0.311 19
.0.425
12
-0.5445 6
-0.589
51 .0.533
6
-0.096
81L~V
0,550
8 I 0.162 20
-0.034 22
*0.226 18
-0.347 IS
-0.462
8
.0.542
7
-0.570
8
.0.097
0
-0.670
o I 1/Ie
0,447
9
0.434
9
-0.134 15
-0.271 17
.0,334 14
.0.432 10
*0.501
9
-0,495
9
-0.417
g l -0.369
10 I TA*~
0.3661 10
0.648
4
0.711
1
0.626
1
0.554
4
0.427 11
0.256 17
0.156 I 21
0.09"/ 24 I -0.561
111TA
0,3~.
11
0.650
3 ~ 0.704
2
0,617
2
0.555
31 o.442 9
0.298 16
0.189 1 17
0.114 22l o . o ~
12 I TA'qT
0,362 12
0.681
1
0.694
3
0.~7
4
0.517
7
0.~
15
0.240 18
O. 151 23
0.056 25 I -0.0~
15 I ~"z
0.337 13
0.632
5
0.656
4
0.559
5
0.476 10
0.338 19
0.183 J 22
0.0~
26
0.041 25
-0.105
0.305 14
141.
0.586
6
0.569
7
0.513
7
0.460 12
0.3~/ 18
0.200 19
0.134 24
0.0~
23
-0.563
ISlTT
0.304 15
0.655
2
0.590
6
0..~2
8
0,478
0
0.410 13
0.3~ 15
0.228 15
0.167 19
0.0~
lO I T~Z
0.287 16
0.509
7
0.631
5
0.604
3
0.572
1
0.499
6
0.386 13
0,263 14
0.183 17
0.407
171T~
0.282 17
0.495
8
0.$52
8
0.556
8
0.544
5
0.438
7 J 0.381 12
0.289 13
0.203 15
0.124
18 I LS*IE
0.229 18
-0.136 21
0,009 18 J 0,216 19
0.259 21
0.319 2ol
o.~
14
0.626 12
0.230 12
0.201
19 I I/Cx
0.205 19
0.167 16
-0.004 26 i 0.403 25
-0.025 25
.0.055 25 I -0.127 15
-0.156 22
-0.201 16
.0.247
2Ol8~
0.204 20
-0.070 25
-0.040 20
-0.130 22
.0.157 22
-0.~
22
-0.188 20
-0,173 18
-0.12o I 21 -0.~o I
21 l e t
0.201 21
-0.620 13
0.013 J 24
0.122 23
0.133 23
0.138 23
0.158 23 i 0.189 15
0.213 13
0.134
22jcx
0.198 22
-0.162 18
0,034 I 23
0,017 24
0.039 I 24
0.0~
24
0.129 24 I 0.169 2O
0.211 14
0 240
-I
l~r
0.175 23
0.416 11
0.563 J 10
-0,563 26 I -0.024 I 20
-0.043 36
.0.0~5 26 ~ .0.122 25
-0.143 20
-0.139
z41c~
0,170 24 J 0.152 19
0.275 I 10
0.356 15 I 0.327 I 17
0.384 10
0.418 10 J 0.347 10
0.247 10
0.12O
25 I llCp
0.170 25 I -0,167
17
.0,256 I 0
-0,312 15 I .0.334 I 18
-0.364 17
-0.414 11 I -0,340
11
.0,240 11
-0,115
25 i Ck~
0.137 26 i 0.001 26
0.250 I 11
0.325 13 I 0.321 [ 18
0.26.3 21
0.187 21 J 0.171
19 J 0.179 18
0.118
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
l a~R
..
1.~o
1.56
1.70
l.eO
1.eo
2.00
z.I0
I ce~
2.2o
0 9rr~
0.856
0.050 j 3
0.833
0.634
-0.712
-0.728
-0.714
-0.407
-O.139
17
25
-0.110
16
23
-0 147
15
10
-0.194
26
-0.~
12
21
22
-0.0~
26
21
0.O32
28
15 I
o.~
2O
12
0.172
14
11
-0.~6
10 I
20
-0.~
nl
24
0,173
10
0.261
11 I
14
-0.140
16 I
16
18
17
0.041
-0,039
0.034
23 I
24 I
19 I
Ie
2.3o
0.g56
1 I
0.073
0.075
0,970
1 I
0.9'90
0.990
0.94~
0.geO
1 I
0.977
o.561
z I
0.561
0.895
0.9O8
2 I
0.031
0.935
0.010
0.894
Zl
51
o.893
o.846
2
z
5
1/1.8
0.843
3 I
O.844
0.840
3 J
0,875
0.884
0.830
0t.*LB
0.845
0.8O8
4 I
0.709
0.701
3
4
0,848
0.790
4 I
0.800
0.703
0.810
IE
0.762
0.645
8 J
0.563
5 I
0.756
0.672
0.091
5 J
0.770
0.787
0.762
0.715
ts
-0.694
-0.6~
-0.~1
-0.~4
8 I .0.~3
-0.689
.0.711
-0.762
I/0L
6
5
0.727
.0,703
.0.715
7 I
-0.561
-0.673
7 J -0.647
.0.099
.0.701
L8*8T
-0.568 ! 7
-0.575
.0.664
8 I .0.561
9
.0.331
-0.678
-0.~
-0.404
-0.664
-0.405
8
9
S l -o.756
4 I .0.777
0 I .0.090
-0.557
15
.0.218
15
.0.408
13
-0.415
17
.0.200 I 17
.0.410
11
.-0.418
.0.893
.0.567
11
-0.4M
12
10
-0.451
13
1112
-0.456
-0.4~
10
TA*'N
.0.197
14
-O.201
11
TA
.0.109
17
-0.185
15 I .0.2o5
17
-0.189
12
TA*TT
-0.210
-0.224
13
-0.234
12
.0.335
14 i
.0.4~
14
-0.451
-0.262
10
-0.256
10
.0.409
12
-0.415
12
.0.472
.0.210
13
13 ] TA"2
-0.249
12
141Fe
15l
-0.149
101
17 N
8
g
.0.389
0 I -0.670
12
-0.592
12
-0,557
13
13l
14
-0.541
14
-0.561
14 I
11
-0.560
11
-0.601
10 I
-0.580
19
-0.162
10
-0.175
18
.0.345
16
.0.353
10
.0.415
18
-0.501
.0.G03
21
15
-0,628
-0,567
15
21
.0.561
21
-0.087
21
-0.360
15
-0.366
15 i -0.399
16
-0.457
0.563
26
O.(Xm
16
-0.480
16
25
0.012
25
0.011
26
.0.225
2O
-0.228
2O I .0.3O4
17
-0.415
0.054
22
0.561
17
-0.456
17
22
0.064
22 I
0.072 124
-0.183
23
-0.184
23
-0.253
2ol
-0.xo
19
-0.412 I 18
18
LIPZE
0.107
15
0.206
14
0.211
10
I/Cx
.0.283
10
-0.271
10
-0.253
11
2O
8A
.0.622
25
-0.012
25
-0.0~
25 i
21
0.189
16
0.192
15
0.202
15 I
22
0T
CX
0.277
11
0.263
11
0.241
12 i
23
1/81"
18 J .0.165
18
-0.174
24
Cp
23 I
23
0,064
24 i -0.033
24
-0,063
20 I
2O
0.107
.0.181
0.032
25
l/Cp
.0.030
25
CWS
0.0~
0.037
0.0~
14 i
0.218
14
0.215
22
0.220 J 22
0.2~
22 I
-0.240
11
-0.250
10
-0.251 i 10
-0.2O4
15 I
0.038 25
0.201 15
0.223 13
0.410
10
0.414 I 13
0.533
10 I
23 i 0.311 22
10 I 0.338 2O
21 I - 0 . ~
21
0.262
17
0,277 I 17
0,215
0,221
21
O,222 J 21
O,Z~
18 I -0.174
19 I
.0,259
18
-0.271 I 18
-0.247
23 I
22 I -0.027
26
-0.023 J 26
0.042
28
0.080 24
0,033 i 25
0.095 J 24
0.070
24 I -0,078
23 I
20 ]
20 i
A~ :
CORR:
0.123
0.037
Ranting
13
-0.2 r,~ ; 12
-0.157 19
Retorts:
40
-0.694
Resistance
and
Powering
o.251
-0.~
0.623
24 I
0.158
-0.o;x
28 I
-0.148
-0.036
28 I .0.036
23
0.286
18
-0.398
19
10
0.594
11
24
23
0.312 J 22
0,367 i 2O
-0.337
I 21
0.176 i 24
25 I -0.156 f 25
25 I
13
11 r,
-0.774
2 ] 0L*IE
1.4o
.......................................................................................................................................................
I 8
IR
.0.o4a i 20
13 I
Table 4
Coefficients
Average Correlation
Hull
5.5
b e t w e e n CR and
Form P a r a m e t e r s
5.0
I
AVE
I R I AVE I R I AVE
......................................................................
IVL
0.5-2.3
0.5-i.0
1 1.1-1.5
AVE
1.7-2.3
..................
4.5
~....-....~
.........
~ .............................................
......................................................................
OL
0.777
0.403
O.gll
0.982
IE
0.621
0.451
0.664
0.729
LWL/Bx
0.573
0.320
0.665
0.712
TA
0.362
0.543
0.137
0.401
FB
0.305
0.451
0.101
10
0.354
0.304
0.492
0.100
11
0.319
TW
0.282
0.504
0.136
0.218
10
BA
0.204
0.134
11
0.081
12
0.369
6x/Tx
0.201
0.147
10
0.191
0,254
Cx
0,198
10
0.073
12
0.238
0,270
Cp
0.170
11
0.307
0.137
0.082
11
CWS
0,137
12
0.224
0.123
0.075
12
:.
TT
'.
""
3.5
m
:
...............
3.0
i"
.,.~
~.- ;,;:~:.::.~.
:
..~'"
..
i
. .......
: .....
1'I,"
"
=0 t ~ = l ! ~
i
-. .............
.::
. ........
":.
.";~; :
2.5
:
........
2.0
. . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . :- . . . . . . . .
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -,Jo . . . . . . .
Remarks:
1.5
AVE:
Average Correlation
arithmetic
is defined
as the
10
14
12
16
18
20
mean o f t h e s u m m a t i o n o f t h e a b s o l u t e
correlation
R
Coefficient
coefficient
values
LWL/BX
Ranktn9
0.75
...........
: ...........
=. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
a,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.70
...........................................................
- . . . . . . i. . . . . . . . . . - . . . . .
''
!.
=.
j.
i.
~ ! . . .
...........
i
~'~.
:: .
:.: . . ". .. . . . . . . .,,
. ~ . . . : ... . . . . k.'.
: . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"i
p,
................................
:";'.-~','.;]~;.: s , :
.f ..,Jr'~. , ~ , i r * . .
. ,",m
"~" &'~"
d'.'. #
0.65
.......
",.
....
"
"/-2 ..............
i:
:
" .'
:
, ."
."
~ : "21.
~ "a "
"
".~
,IZ
"
"l
"
"
%.
0.55
,l
0.60
:3 ~;z3;L" "'.
.......................
,~..'..o.~
"''
",
16
."
"
"
.|
"
17
18
19
20
21
0.64
0.68
, ......................
=
.................................
0.50
15
"
, ................................................
14
.. .
0.72
0.76
................
0.80
CWP
cws
Resistance
and Powering
41
350
0.58
:
300
250
..........
.'. . . . . . . . . . . .
.......
;.; ......
:"
,.
0.56
................
~................,........:.......i ................i...............
054
,..............
~....-
:=
200
...........
io . . . . . . . . . . .
i--- .........
",
".
0.52
C~
..it.
t=I
|.
.........
..........
? ...........
.";"~":"
...~
:;
. "
: .-,~"
!
0
;"
,,.'.
. "?"" " r
""
.;'"
:,r.
.'~,
, . t . . : "i
- -
.~iY..'.~
....................................
?~.J
"r
,,
0.50
"~
~ ..........
,~.
;
10
"
..
.;
.
tl~.~.~
o~.
~ ......................
.'l"
"..,'....
,"
m
......
~ .......
......
................
.!"
0.48
i!
2D
15
Scatter
Plot
for
......
............
20
25
30
0.46
35
0.0
......:........................,.............................j
0.1
0.2
0.3
IE (DEG)
Figure
~ ...........
i.
"
.I
m
.-,,i ;..~......... - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . _ _ -:,~.,',,ii+-~
__,~.=.,
. ,
lO0
-ta."m:'Y'ue'~e=.-,
.......... i ......
: ..............
=o
:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m m
,50
D L VS.
0.4
O:
TA
IE
Figure
400
2F
Scatter
Plot
for FB VS. TA
20
350
................................................................................
17
300
~ ........ , ........
250
........ -'-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
200
14
..........
11
..........
I! . . . . . . . . . . .
;.
m
!
150
. . . . . . . . "........................................................................
100
.......
"......
........
= ( o e
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~";..
l
,
.
.. o~'
.
; , ; " . , 4 1 t . j ~ -~', I ,
i,,~.-l=.t.t~.~,s
~
*.
42
2E
, ........
;
:
. . . . . .
;
:
.
i
.:
'~ "~,.TN~;',"
;...=,'-i;,;t
! ...........
-i,
".,'.,~.
......................
10
12
r--.. ,~
I
14
16
"'; . . . . . . .
:
.
:
!
!............
i ...........
. ........
:
!
~..........
Scatter
Plot
i-
!.i
.........
.......
~.
-:- . . . . . . . . . .
.:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-4.l
18
" :;...:
20
I0
LWL/BX
Figure
..........
":
~ 1 ~ . . ~ . . . . . ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
! ........
,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...........
: I
=,
...........
15
IE
Figure
2G
Scatter
Plot
20
25
(DEG)
for L~/BxVS.
BE
30
0.5
1.0
>
........
0.4
Y .......
.................
." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o;..". ........................
0.8
................................................
.................................................
.......................................
,i.
::"
__0.0
.....
0.5
=.
o.?'n.
t,
tqr= ~ .
.,.P.;.~,~.,.,,'.'
," . "
".
'
=."
................
"..
ore..
..
-:
:.~
0.7
Pn
" .
"
-.
~"
"
.
.
.
,"
"
l
:
:.
".'. . . . . . . . . . . . .
:................
-....................................................
:"
'*
0.0
0.8
0.9
L ....
0.64
1.0
L.
0.68
0.72
0.76
0.80
0.8,
CWP
1.0
................................................
0.8
............
.'-..i....'..."
..........................................................
~,.:
,
...........................................
"."
. . ., t,
o
I'
.3
0.4
. ,
-.
CX
0.~
u.:z
................................
"
.a, sCl...e;.
.,
,;.
. . . . . .a. . . . ~ , ' g . o .. . . . . ~
:
:.
=-;
..t-
o.
,
-__it.
0.6
.
:
0.4
L ................................
."
'- .........
"
::
F,
0.2
.-~
: .................................
v.~
..............
.
|
0.3
oo
......................
0.6
~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.o*
.
, z = *
-" :'";".."":~:';
".,;
"
: - .
,%
,"":
..
.......
.';~..~'-..
: ................
" ................
:................
';
[-,
i.
0.2
1 . 1
............................
r
0.4
: . . . . . . . . . . . "....................
..
-ho
:
0.1
"
o
--
~',.~1
":i .% ..'... : . .
................ r ~:.".,.~
E". ':"-:
. ~ . .
..
-,'...
:
: - ; s..*.%.t.; ."
, :- -~..--.~-.. . .
"o
.-...
0.2
.....................................
-~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.0
~"
0.0
.'.."
0.0
i.
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
TA
TT
Resistance
and
Powering
43
of T e r m s
Residua! Error
0 14
0.12
O.l
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
10
VL=0.O
15
N u m b e r of T e r m s
~
VL=I.2
20
44
25
VL=I.8
30
CI+aI*DL+a2/DL
C2 + a3*(Bx/Tx) + a4/(Bx/Tx)
C3 + a5*Cp + a6/Cv
C4 + a7*Cx + a8/Cx
C5 + ag*IE + al0/IE
C6+alI*TA+aI2*TA 2
(27 + al3*TW + aI4*TW 2
C8 + aI5*TT
C 9 + aI6*BA
CI0 + aI7*CWS
45
(2)
where,
~: fitted value of y
The R 2 values for all speeds are listed in Table 5 and the
"residuary resistance coefficient components" for each hull form
parameters are listed in Tables 6A to 6J and shown in Figures 4A
to 10C, respectively.
This final regression model was applied to the three sets of
data. The first set of data was composed mainly of 426 transom
stem ships with relatively low values of displacement-length
ratios, namely less than 120. The major components of this set
of data were several high-speed displacement hull form series,
e.g., Bailey Series, Series F, Series G, 1913/14 DD Series, Series
64, Series 66, Webb Transom Stem Series, and HSVA "B" and
"C" Series, plus a certain amount of random model test data.
The disadvantages of relying solely on either random or
methodical series model test data were as follow: (1) Random
model test data usually was carried over a long period of time,
neither the environment of the testing facilities nor the data
acquisition technique could remain unchanged. (2) On the other
hand, methodical model series did not usually possess good
random rectangular distributions but trends instead. The reverse,
therefore, was generally true for their advantages. The mixing of
these two different types of data would certainly enhance the data
distribution and the analytic capability of the regression model.
The analytical result of the first set of data was very encouraging
and was documented in a program called "DDHS.WKI". The
shortfall of this program was its confinement in the range of
displacement-length ratio.
A more aggressive program was pursued afterwards. The
second set of data was compiled mainly of data from the
previous set, plus an additional 337 auxiliary type ships. The
46
distinction between the second and first sets of data was that
large amount of cruiser stem ship data was introduced. The
findings from the second set of data were quite disappointing.
Even though cross-coupling terms were added to the previous
regression model, the resulting regression program still failed to
yield valid resistance predictions for cruiser stem ships in the
hump region. This failure was caused mainly by the distinctive
dynamic effects from these two types of stem (see Figure 1).
Unfortunately, the half run angle and buttock angle were not
completely recorded for this set of data. No further attempts in
regression analysis using this hybrid (transom and cruiser sterns)
data set were pursued.
The previous f'mdings clearly revealed that the distinctive flow
characteristics between the transom and cruiser sterns had a
significant influence on ship resistance, particularly when the
values of speed-length ratio approached unity. Obviously, failure
to incorporate appropriate hull form parameters in a regression
analysis might lead the model astray. As noted earlier, half run
angle and buttock angle are not usually available in early stage
design. The only altemative left for continuing this study was to
discard resistance prediction for cruiser stem ships, and
concentrate on maximizing the range of applicability for ships
with transom stems. The achievement of the third set of data
was rather encouraging. This set of data was a subset of the
previous group of data excluding ships with cruiser stems. The
correlation coefficients and residuary resistance coefficient
components presented in this paper are all based on the third set
of data. The resulted program from this set of data was
documented in a program called "CRTS3D.WKI", a sample
output of this program is presented in Appendix B.
The last group of data, seemingly, was composed of a wide
variety of ship types, e.g., high-speed, slender displacement hulls,
low-speed heavy displacement ocean survey ships .... etc.
However, in reality, they all exhibited the same buttock flow
characteristics, which was the essential element and the key to
success for this study. Extensive evaluation of the program
"CRTS3D.WKI" was conducted, and the bare hull resistance
prediction was found to have a wide range of application,
comparable to several renowned regression programs which were
tailored for specific ship types (see Appendix C).
4.2 Bare Hull Residuary Resistance Equation Verification
and Hull Form Design
The program "CRTS3D.WKI" achieved a certain degree of
success as a resistance predictor, thereby meeting the first
objective of this paper. The program CRTS3D.WKI could not
be considered as having fulfilled the second objective if the
predicted result was merely a derived "mean value" from a group
of data. Unfortunately, this is a widely misconception about
statistically based resistance prediction programs within the naval
architecture community.
A balanced measure for any resistance regression model should
also be based on its analytical capability in physics. General
guidelines or weighing factors to assess this capability are not
available.
However, if the independent variables do not
correlated among each another, and the magnitude of the "t"
values from the regression equation possess a similar order as the
correlation coefficients, then a regression equation could be
considered as a balanced model in both statistical and physical
sense. This is not the case for this model because, as shown
previously, the hull foml parameters were highly correlated to
one another. Therefore, similar orders of magnitude for both the
"t" statistic and correlation values, could not be achieved; even
though the regression model might be highly regarded in physical
measure. The alternative to quantify the physical validity of a
RESIDUAL
S.E./1000
v / I ~ ~'
tmma'~-SQUAR~
0..50
0.874
0.28,5
0.081
126
0.60
0.930
0.179
0.032
370
0.70
0.954
0.178
0.032
471
0.80
0.968
0.172
0.030
487
0.90
0.978
0.168
0.028
496
1.00
0.985
0.171
0.029
502
1.10
0.986
0.181
0.033
512
1.20
0.987
0.197
0.039
491
1.30
0.992
0.193
0.037
474
1.40
0.995
0.193
0.037
460
1..50
0.997
0.183
0.034
432
1.60
0.997
0.188
0.035
411
1.70
0.997
0.189
0.036
388
1.80
0.997
0.181
0.033
343
1.90
0.999
0.143
0.020
143
2.00
0.998
0.167
0.028
142
2.10
0.997
0.174
0.030
140
2.20
0.998
0.130
0.017
130
2..3O
0.998
0.126
0.016
126
Note:
N:
R2:
S.E.:
number of observation
squared multiple correlation coefficient
standard error of estimate
where,
fitted value of y
47
DL ~ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.00
2.00
2.10
...........................................................................................................................................................................
20.00
-0.217 . 0 . 6 8 1 .0.950
25.00
.0.260
-0.476
-0.533
.0,740
-0.796 -0.908
-0.768
-0.437 -0.294
0.001
30.00
-0.119 .0.432
.0.597
-0.527 -0,693
.0.543
.0.195
35.00
-0.008
40.00
.0.003
-0.300
.0.410
45.00
-0.042 .0.254
50.00
.0.0~3
-0.216 .0.289
55.00
-0.0~
-0.183
-0.530 .0.300
.0.401 .0.399
-0.344 .0.3]8
-0.221
.0.289
.0.249
-0.242 -0.188
-0.0~
0.601
1.346
1.815
1.035
1.737
2.263
2.20
2.30
0.020
0.389
1.427
2.120
2.527
0.004
0.286
0.727
1.795
2.498
2.899
3.082
3.499
2.896
2.494
2.988
2.690
0.176
0.521
1.033
2.148
2.874
3,278
3.449
3,821
3.216
2.797
3.256
2.944
0.330
0.736
1.319
2.491
3.247
3.660
3.623
4.161
3,545
3.105
3.541
3.212
.0.195
0.015
0.472
0.937
1.590
2.62.7
3.619
4.044
4.203
4.313
3.883
3.417
3.037
3.489
-0.111
0.115
0.605
1.128
1.850
3.158
3.ggo
4.431
4.586
4.876
4.225
3.731
4.142
3.773
.0.035
0.200
0.731
1.311
2.102
3,485
4.351
4.819
4.973
5.245
4.571
4.048
4.453
4.062.
4.385
60.00
0 . 0 0 0 -0.155 .0.201
-0.134
65.00
0 . 0 2 3 -0.130
-0.005
0.034
0.294
0.852
1.488
2.347
3.809
4.731
5.208
5.361
5.620
4.919
4.367
4.769
70.00
0.000
0.376
0.969
1.661
2.588
4.130
5.100
5.598
5.752
5.999
5.270
4.587
5.089
4.651
75.00
0 . 0 4 8 -0.087 .0.102
0.001
0.158
0.453
1.003
1.830
2.825
4.450
5.469
5.988
6.143
6.3~
5.622
5.008
5.411
4.950
.0.074
0.039
0.216
0.5,?.8 1 . 1 9 3
1.996
3.059
4.769
5.838
6.379
6.536
6.767
5.976
5.330
5.736
5.251
-0.052 .0.049
0.070
0.270
0.600
1.302
2.159
3.291
5.006
5.200
6.771
6.930
7.155
6.331
5.652
6.004
5.553
0.I10
0.322
0.671
1.409
2.320
3.520
5.402
6.575
7.163
7.325
7.544
6.007
5.975
6.392
5.857
80.00
0 . 0 0 0 .0.069
65.00
0.07]
90.00
0 . 0 0 2 -0.036
95.00
.0.164
.0.025
0 . 0 0 2 -0.020 .0.003
0.143
0.373
0.739
1.514
2.480
3.747
5.717
6.943
7.555
7.720
7.935
7.044
6.298
0.723
6.162
0 . 1 0 2 -0.006
0.019
0.175
0,421
0.806
1.618
2.638
3.973
6.032
7.311
7.948
8.116
6.328
7.402
6.622
2.004
6.468
110.00
0.122
0.020
0.059
0.235
0.515
0.936
1.823
2.950
4.421
6.659
8.046
8.734
120.00
0.141
0.044
0.005
0.292
0.605
1.002
2.024
3.258
4.865
7.285
8.782
9.520
100.00
130.00
0.159
0.007
0.130
0.347
0.691
1.185
2.223
3.554
5.306
7.908
9.517
10.307
140.00
0.177
0.008
0.163
0.399
0.775
1.305
2.419
3.007
5.744
8.531
10.251
11.095
1.50.00
160.00
0.195
0.212
0.109
0.128
0.194
0.224
0.449
0,499
0.857
0.938
1.424
1,541
2.614
2.808
4.168
4.468
6.180
9.153
10.986
11.003
170.00
0.229
0.147
0.253
0.547
1.017
1.657
3.000
4.767
180.00
0.246
0.165
0.281
0.594
1.005
1.772
3.192
5.064
5,361
190.00
0.263
0,183
0.309
0.641
1.172
1.686
3.383
200.00
0.279
0.200
0.336
0.686
1.248
1.999
3.573
5.657
210.00
0.295
0.217
0.362
0.732
1.324
2.112
3.763
5.952
220.00
0.312
0.233
0.388
0.775
1.399
2.224
3.952
6.247
230.00
0.328
0.250
0.414
0.821
1.473
2.336
4.140
6.541
240.00
0.344
0.200
0,439
0.005
1.547
2.447
4.329
6.835
250.00
0.360
0.282
0.464
o.g08
1.521
2.558
4.517
7.128
...........................................................................................................................................................................
Bx/Tx \ ~
0.60
0,70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1,40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1,00
2.00
2.10
..............................................................................................................................................................................
2.20
2.30
2.200
.0.224
1.297
1.271
1.688
2.037
2.800
2.780
2.605
2.405
1.736
1.214
0.922
0.744
1.632
0.724
0.957
1.366
1.404
2.400
.0.216
1.272
1.244
1.648
1.986
2.733
2.720
2.547
2.354
1.706
1.205
0.924
0.750
1.605
0.728
0.g64
1.343
1.400
2.600
.0.210
1.258
1.227
1.622
1.953
2.689
2.683
2.510
2.324
1.590
1.204
0.931
0.760
1.5=32
0.737
0.976
1.332
1.405
2.800
-0.206
1.252
1.218
1.607
1.934
2.664
2.664
2.491
2.309
1.685
1.zn
0.944
0.774
1.589
0.750
0.994
1.329
1.418
3.000
-0.203
1.252
1.216
1.602
1.925
2.654
2.659
2.485
2.306
1.688
1.223
0.960
0.790
1.593
0.765
1.015
1.333
1.437
3.200
.0.201
1.258
1.219
1.603
1.925
2.656
2.666
2.490
2.314
1.699
1.239
0.979
0.809
1.605
0.783
1.039
1.343
1.461
3.400
.0.200
1.268
1.227
1.611
1.933
2.668
2.683
2.505
2.329
1.715
1.260
1.001
0.830
1,621
0.803
1.065
1.356
1.489
3.600
-0.200
1.282
1.238
1.624
1.946
2.688
2.708
2.527
2.352
1.737
1.283
1.025
0.852
1.643
0.824
1.094
1.374
1.521
3.800
-0.200
1.299
1.253
1.640
1.g~5
2.715
2.740
2.555
2.381
1.762
1.309
1.051
0.878
1.668
0.846
1.124
1.395
1.555
4.000
.0.201
1.319
1.270
1.661
1.988
2.748
2.778
2.589
2.414
1.791
1.337
1.078
0.901
1.600
0.870
1.156
1.419
1.592
4.200
-0.203
1.341
1.289
1.684
2.015
2.786
2.820
2.627
2.452
1,822
1.367
1.107
0.g27
1.727
0.895
1.189
1.444
1.631
4.400
-0.204
1.365
1.311
1.710
2.045
2.829
2.867
2.670
2.494
1.857
1.399
1.136
0.954
1.760
0.920
1.223
1.472
1.672
4.600
-0.206
1.391
1.334
1.739
2.078
2.876
2.917
2.716
2.538
1.893
1.437
1.167
0.981
1.700
0.947
1.258
1.502
1.714
4.800
-0.209
1.418
1.358
1.769
2.113
2.925
2.971
2.765
2.586
1.932
1.466
1.199
1.009
1.833
0.973
1.294
1.533
1,758
5.000
-0.211
1.446
1.384
1.801
2.151
2.978
3.028
2.817
2,636
1.972
1.501
1.231
1.038
1.872
1.001
1.331
1.565
1.803
5.200 -0.214
1.476 1.411 1.835 2.190 3.033 3.087 2.871 2.588 2.013 1.538 1.264 1.007 1.912 1.029 1.368
..............................................................................................................................................................................
1.599
1.849
48
Cp \ VI.
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
l.lO
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.g0
2.00
..........................................................................................................................................................................
2.10
2.20
2.30
0.52
2.926
0.540
-0.194
-0.618
-2.396
-2.998
-3.808
0.53
2.918
0.540
.0.187
.0.596
-2.329
-2.924
-3.757
.8.597
0.54
2.912
0.539
.0.179
-0.575
-2.264
-2.853
-3.709
-11.464
.6.303
0.55
2.906
0.539
.0.171
.0.555
-2.201
-2.784
-3.662
-8.541
.0.302
-4.504
.6.063
-7.007
-0.848
-9.079
0.56
2.902
0.539
-0.164
.0.535
-2.140
-2.717
-3.618
-0.304
-4.526
-6.072
-7.010
-0.847
.0.885
0.57
2.899
0.539
-0.157
.0.516
-2.081
-2.652
-3.576
-6.308
-4.548
.0.083
-7.016
-6.849
-9.894
0.56
2.897
0.540
-0.150
.0.497
-2.023
-2.590
-3.535
.8.482
-11.676 -U.476
-0.315
-4.572
-6.096
-7.07.3
-0.853
.0.906
0.$9
2.895
0.540
-0.143
.0.478
-1.967
-2.529
-3.496
-8.324
-4.596
-6.110
-7.033
-8.860
-9.920
0.60
2.895
0.541
-0.137
.0.460
-1.912
-2.470
-3.459
-11.502
-8.336
-4.622
.0.126
-7.044
-8.869
-9.938
0.61
2.895
0.542
-0.130
.0.443
-1.859
-2.412
-3.423
.8.447
-8.349
-4.648
-6.143
-7.058
-8.880
-9.957
0.62
2.896
0.543
-0.124
.0.425
-1.807
-2.356
-3.389
.8.441
-10.651
-8.365
-4.675
.0.181
-7.072
.8.894
-9.979
0.63
2.898
0.544
-0.118
-0.409
-1.757
-2.302
-3.3b'?
.8.437
-10.668 -12.307
-11.787
-11.563
.8.382.
-4.703
-6.181
-7.069
.8.910 -10.003
0.64
2.900
0.f45
-0.112
-0.392
-1.707
-2.249
-3.325
-11.589
.8.401
-4.731
-6.202
-7.107
-8.928 -10.030
0.65
2.903
0.546
.0.106
.0.376
-1.659
-2.197
-3.295
-11.850 -11.617
.0.422
-4.760
.6.224
-7.126
-8.947 -10.058
0.66
2.907
0.548
-0.100
.0.361
-1.812
-2.147
-3.266
-11.647
.6.445
-4.790
.6.247
-7.147
.8.569 -10.0~8
0.67
2.911
0.549
-0.095
-0.345
-1.566
-2.098
-3.239
.0.469
-4.821
.0.271
-7.189
.8.992 -10.120
0.68
2.916
0.551
-0.089
.0.330
-1.521
-2.050
-3.212
-11.714
-8.495
-4.852
-8.297
-7.192
.8.017 -lO.IS4
0.69
2.921
0.555
-0.083
.0.310
-1.477
-2.003
-3.187
.8.45,3
-8.522
-4.884
-6.323
-7.217
-9.043 .10.190
0.70
2.927
0.554 -0.076 -0.301
-1.435 -1.957 -3.162 .8.462 -10.849 -12.540 -12.045 -11.790 -8.551 -4.915 .8.350
........................................................................................................................................................................
-7.243
-0.071
-10.627
-12.221
-10.609 -12.221
-11.481
-11.646 -11.470
-11.961
-10.227
CX ~ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0,90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
..........................................................................................................................................................................
2.10
2.20
2.30
0.62
o2.051 -0.710
0.220
0.797
2.754
2.722
4.147
9.755
12.824
14.832
14.618
0.64
-2.031
-0.709
0.208
0.773
2.721
2.687
4.107
9.697
12.752
14.753
14.539
14.490
14.409
0,66
-2.013
-0.710
0.196
0.750
2.691
2.656
4.072
8.649
12.695
14.692 14.476
14.345
0.68
-1.997
-0.711
0.185
0.729
2.665
2.628
4.042
9.612
12.651 14.645
14.428
14.295
0.70
-1.984
.0.712
0.174
0.708
2.642
2.603
4.016
9.584
12.619
14.612
14.394
14.259
10.918
7.072
7.991
9.507
10.110
12.514
0.72
-1.973
-0.714
0.163
0.589
2.621
2.581
3.994
9.565
12.598
14.592
14.372
14.236
10.890
7.054
7.971
9.484
10.099
12.495
0.74
-1.963
-0.717
0.153
0.671
2.604
2.561
3.976
9.553
12.587
14.583
14.382
14.224 10.873
7.643
7.957
9.468
10.097 12.487
0.76
-1.956
-0.720
0.143
0.654
2.588
2.544
3.961
9.548
12.585
14.585
14.362
14.223
10.864
7.036
7.949
9.460
10.101
12.488
0.78
-1.949
-0.723
0.134
0.638
2.575
2.529
3.949
9.551
12.592
14.596
14.372
14.232
10.862
7.035
7.947
9.458
10.113
12.497
0.80
-1.945
-0.727
0.125
0.623
2.563
2.516
3.940
9.559
12.607
14.619
14.392
14.249
10.868
7.038
7.950
9.463
10.131
12.515
0.82
-1.941
-0.731
0.116
0.608
2.554
2.505
3.934
8.575
12.630
14.649
14.420
14.275
10.881
7.045
7.957
9.473
10.154
12.5,.~
0.84
-1.939
-0.735
0.108
0.594
2.546
2.496
3.930
9.592
12.659
14.686
14.455
14.309
10.899
7.057
7.970
9.489
10.183
12.571
0.86
-1.938
-0.740
0.100
0.581
2.540
2.488
3.928
9.617
12.695
14.731
14.498
14.349
10.923
7.072
7.986
9.509
10.218
12.608
0.88
-1.938
-0.745
0.092
0.569
2.535
2.482
3.929
9.645
12.737
14.783
14.548
14.397
10.953
7.090
8.006
9 . 5 . 3 5 10.256
12.652
0.90
-1.939
.0.750
0.084
0.557
2.532
2.477
3.931
9.679
12.784
14.841 14.604
0.92
-1.940
-0.756
0.077
0.545
2.530
2.473
3.936
9.716
0.94
-1.943
-0.762
0.069
0.5,34
2.530
2.471
3.942
9.757
0.96
-1.947
-0.758
0.062
0.524
2.530
2.470
3.949
9.801
0.98
-1.951
-0.774
0.055
0.514
2.532
2.470
3.959
14.451
49
IE \ VI.
0,60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1,80
1.90
2.00
...........................................................................................................................................................................
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.0
-0.263
0.360
0.550
0.762
0.969
1.223
1.250
1.051
3.0
.0.171
0.297
0.437
0.594
0.741
0.928
0.934
0,774
0.780
0.565
4.0
.0.123
0.283
0.403
0.535
0.056
0.814
0.806
0.657
0.471
0.140
0.022
5.0
.0. 094
0.288
0.399
0.521
0.628
0.773
0.753
0.605
0.426
0.117
0.011
-0.015
8.0
-0.073
0.302
0.410
0.528
0.628
0.768
0.738
0.585
0.404
0.102
0.002
-0.023
7.0
.0.058
0.323
0.431
0.548
0.645
0.784
0.745
0.583
0.397
0.093
-0.005
.0.030
8.0
.0.046
0.346
0.457
0.576
0.672
0.612
0.765
0.593
0.398
0.086
.0.011
-0.037
-0.017
-1,071
-0.235
.0.209
-0.673
.0.495
0.0
-0.036
0.372
0.486
0.609
0.705
0.850
0.794
0.610
0.405
0.081
.0.017
.0.043
-0.025
-I.048
.0.232
.0.208
-0.666
-0.499
-0.0~
O.OGS -1.189
.0.007
-1.114
-0.258
-0.222
-0.729
-0.515
-0.244
-0.213
.0.692
.0.499
10.0
-0.027
0.400
0.519
0.646
0.743
0.693
0.829
0.633
0.416
0.078
.0.022
-0.049
.0.034
*1.041
0.231
.0.210
-0.668
-0.509
11.0
.0.020
0.429
0.553
0.685
0.785
0.941
0.868
0.659
0.420
0.076
-0.028
-0.056
-0.041
-1.044
-0.233
-0.214
-0.675
-0.522
12.0
.0.013
0.459
0.588
0.726
0.830
0.992
0.912
0.688
0.445
0,075
.0.032
-0.062
-0.049
-1.055
.0.236
.0.219
.0.688
-0.538
13.0
.0.007
0.489
0.625
0.769
0.876
1.045
0.957
0.760
0.463
0.074
.0.037
-0.068
.0.056
-1.072
-0.240
.0.225
-0.704
-0.557
14.0
.0.001
0.520
0.662
0.814
0.924
1.101
1.005
0.753
0.482
0.074
-0.042
-0.074
-0.(~3
-1.094
.0.246
-0.232
-0.723
-0.577
15.0
0.004
0.551
0.701
0.859
0.973
1.158
1.055
0.788
0.502
0.074
.0.046
-0.080
-0.070
-1.120
.0.253
.0.240
-0.744
-0.599
16.0
17.0
0.009
0.013
0.583
0.615
0.739
0.779
0.904
0.951
1.023
1.074
1.217
1.276
1.106
1.158
0.824
0.861
0.523
0.545
0.075
-0.051
.0.085
-0.077
-1.149
-0.260
-0.248
-0.767
.0.622
2.10
2.20
2.30
18.0
0.018
0.647
0.818
0.898
1.126
1.337
1.211
0.899
0.567
19.0
0.022
0.680
0.858
1.046
1.178
1.398
1.264
0.937
0.590
20.0
0.026
0.712
0.898
1.094
1.231
1.460
1.319
0.976
0.613
...........................................................................................................................................................................
TA \ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
...........................................................................................................................................................................
50
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.02
0.013
0.006
0.007
0.013
0.012
0.011
.0.006
.0.013
0.006
-0.011
-0.003
.0.013
.0.027
.0,007
.0.033
.0.008
.0.015
0.004
0.005
0.04
0.029
0.016
0.017
0.028
0.026
0.025
-O.(X)8 -0.022
0.012
-0.020
-0.006
-0.026
-0.052
.0.014
-0.064
-0.015
-0.030
0.06
0.047
0.029
0.031
0.046
0.043
0.041
.0.006
.0.020
0.019
-0.029
.0.009
.0.039
.0.077
.0.019
-0,093
-0.023
.0.046
0.005
O.GB
0.067
0.046
0.049
0.065
0.061
0.059
.0.002
.0.033
0.027
-0.036
-0.011
.0.051
-0.101
-0.024
.0.119
.0.030
.0.061
0.001
0.10
0.090
0.067
0.069
0.087
0.083
0.079
O.O~S -0.035
0.036
.0.043
o0.014
.0.062
-0.123
-0.028
-0.144
-0.037
-0.076
-0.004
0.12
0.116
0.091
0.093
0.111
0.106
0.101
0.018
0.045
-0.048
-0.017
-0.074
-0.145
-0.030
-0.167
.0.044
-0.092
.0.012
0.14
0.143
0.118
0.121
0.137
0.132
0.126
0.033
.0.628
0.055
.0.053
.0,019
-0.084
.0.166
.0.032
.0.187
.0.050
-0.107
.0.023
0.16
0.173
0,150
0.152
0.166
0.160
0.153
0.051
.0.021
0.066
-0.056
-0.021
-0.095
.0.186
.0.033
.0.206
.0.057
-0.123
.0.036
0.18
0.206
0.185
0.187
0.196
0.191
0.183
0.073
.0.011
0.078
-0.058
-0.024
-0.105
-0.205
.0.033
.0.222
.0.063
-0.139
.0.051
0.20
0.241
0.223
0.225
0.229
0.224
0.215
0.098
0.003
0.091
-0.0EO -0.026
.0.U4
.0.223
-0.032
.0.237
.0.069
-0.155
.0.069
.0.033
0.22
0.278
0.265
0.266
0.264
0.259
0.248
0.126
0.019
0.104
-0.060
.0.028
-0.123
-0.240
.0.030
-0.249
.0.075
.0.170
.0.089
0.24
0.318
0.311
0.311
0.301
0.297
0.285
0.158
0.038
0.119
-0.060
-0.030
.0.132
.0.256
-0.027
.0.260
-0.081
.0.186
.0.111
0.26
0.380
0.360
0.359
0.340
0.336
0.323
0.193
0.059
0.134
-0.058
-0.032
o0.140
.0.271
-0.023
.0.268
-0.087
.0.202
-0.136
0.28
0.405
0.412
0.411
0.382
0.379
0.364
0.232
0.084
0.149
-0.055
.0.034
-0.148
.0.285
.0.019
.0.275
-0.092
.0.218
.0.163
0.30
0.452
0.460
0.466
0.426
0.423
0.407
0.274
0.112
0.166
.0.051
.0.036
.0.155
.0.208
.0.013
.0.279
.0.098
.0.235
.0.193
0.32
0.501
0.528
0.525
0.472
0.470
0.452
0.320
0.142
0.183
.0.047
.0.037
.0.162
.0.310
.0.007
-0.281
-0.103
.0.251
.0.224
0.34
0.553
0.592
0.587
0.520
0.520
0.500
0.368
0.175
0.201
-0.041
.0.039
.0.169
.0.321
0.001
.0.281
-0.108
.0.267
-0.259
0.36
0.607
0.650
0.652
0.570
0.571
0.550
0.421
0.212
0.220
-0.034
-0.040
-0.175
.0.331
0.009
-0.280
-0.113
.0.283
-0.296
0.38
0.664
0.730
0.721
0.622
0.625
0.602
0.478
0.251
0.240
-0.026
.0.042
.0.181
.0.341
0.019
-0.276
.0.117
-0.300
.0.335
0.40
0.723
0.804
0.794
0.677
0.682
0.656
0.536
0.293
0.260 -0.017 -0.043 .0.186 .0.349
0.0~9 .0.270 .0.122
...........................................................................................................................................................................
.0.316
.0.376
TW\ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
..........................................................................................................................................................................
0.00
0,000
0.1000 0 . 0 0 0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.05
-0.016 .0.005
-0.006
0,10
.0.051
.0.039
0.1';
-0.070
-0.053
.0.033
.0.028
-0.009
.0.012
.0.027
.0.048
-0.045
0.038
.0.011
-0.016
.0.039
-0.069
0.20
-0.044 .0.012
0.25
-0.092
-0,069
.0.057
-0.048
0.30
.0.0%
-0,071 .0.058
.0.048
0.35
-0.006 .0.069
.0.006
0.40
-0.090
-0.063
.0.050
-0.040
-0.00~
-0.030
0.45
.0.006
.0.053
.0.040
.0.031
0,004
0.06
0.065
-0.039
.0.028
-0.020
0.55
.0.045
-0.G22
.0.011
.0.005
0.60
-0.020
0.000
0.009
0.013
0 . 0 3 1 -0.028
0.65
0.009
0.026
0.032
0.034
0.042
-0.026
-0.087
.0.207
0.70
0.043
0.055
0.059
0.057
0 . 0 5 5 .0.023
.0.085
0.75
0.082
0.089
0.089
0.084
0.069
.0.019
-0.082
.0.218
-0.314
0.80
0.125
0.125
0.123
0.114
0 . 0 8 5 -0.015
.0.077
-0.221 -0.329
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.10
2.20
2.30
0,000
-0.024
-0.051
-0.053
-0.062
.0.065
.0.048
-0.075
.0.078
.0.091
.0.097
.0.071
-0.021 -0.050
-0.089 -0.099
-0.103 .0.120
-0.127 -0.095
.0.012
-0.024
-0.059
.0.108
-0.122
-0.127
.0.149
.0.157
-0.118
.0.010
.0.027
-0.067 .0.126
.0.144
.0.151 .0.176
.0.106
.0.141
.0.174
-0.203
-0,213
.0.164
.0.079
.0.106
-0.106
-0.1~5
.0.228
-0.241
.0.187
-0.280
-0.259
.0.106
-0.221
.0.299
-0.030
-0.083
.0.106
-0.207
.0.218
-0.254
-0.267
.0.209
.0.319
-0.293
-0.199
-0.253
-0.334
0.012
0.030
.0.086
.0.161
-0.226
.0.239
.0.278
.0.292
-0.231
-0.358
.0.326
.0.231
-0.2845 -0.369
0.020
-0.020
.0.006
.0.191
.0.245
.0.206
.0.301
-0.317
.0.253
.0.399
-0.362
.0.265
-0.320
-0.006 .0.200
-0.263
.0.260
.0.324
-0.398
.0.281
.0.299
.0.340
.0.3454 -0.297
.0.482
-0.433
-0.339
.0.367
.0.306
.0.318
-0.524
-0.336
.0.306
.0.407
.0.340
.0.068
-0.506
.0.354
.0.408
-0.470
-0.467
-0.635
-0.567
0.85
0.174
0.167
0.106
0.147
0.102 .0.010 -0.071 -0.223 -0.344 -0.371
-0.426 -0.447 .0.382 .0.067 -0.570
.........................................................................................................................................................................
-0.421
-0.392
-0.403
-0.510
-0.5445 -0.598
TT \ Vl.
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
...........................................................................................................................................................................
0.000
2.20
2.30
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.02
0.005
0.007
0.009
0 . 0 0 8 -0.003 - 0 . 0 0 3
0.002
0.009
0.005
0.009
0.007
0.010
0.015
0.04
0.010
0.014
0.017
0 . 0 1 6 .0.005
.0.006
0.005
0.017
0.010
0.018
0.015
0.020
0.029
0.06
0.015
0.020
0.026
0 . 0 2 4 -0.008
-0.009
0.007
0.026
0.015
0.027
0.022
0.029
0.044
0.08
0.020
0.027
0.035
0 . 0 3 2 .0,010
-0.012
0.009
0.035
0.020
0.037
0.030
0.039
0.058
0.10
0.026
0.034
0.043
0 . 0 4 0 .0.013
.0.016
0.012
0.044
0.026
0.045
0.037
0.049
0.073
0.035
0.066
0.019
0.056
0.045
0.12
0.031
0.041
0.052
0 . 0 4 8 .0.015
-0.019
0.014
0.052
0.031
0.065
0.045
0.059
0.088
0.042
0.079
0.023
0.067
0.054
0.14
0.036
0.048
0.061
0 . 0 0 6 -0.018 - 0 . 0 2 2
0.016
0.061
0.036
0.064
0.052
O.O~J 0 . 1 0 2
0.049
0.092
0.026
0.070
0.062
0.16
0.041
0.055
0.069
0 . 0 6 4 -0.020
0.019
0.070
0.041
0.073
0.060
0.078
0.117
0.066
0.105
0.030
0.090
0.071
0.18
0.046
0.061
0.078
0 . 0 7 2 -0.023 -0.028
0.021
0.079
0.046
0.062
0.067
0.088
0.131
0.063
0.118
0.034
0.101
0.080
0.20
0.051
0.068
0.087
0 . 0 8 1 .0.026
0.623
0.067
0.051
0.091
0.075
0.098
0.146
0.070
0.131
0.038
0.112
O.O~J
0.22
0.006
0.075
0,026
0.096
0.006
0.101
0.082
0.108
0.161
0.077
0.144
0.041
0.124
0.098
0.24
0.061
0.062
0.104
0 . 0 9 7 .0.031 - 0 . 0 3 7
0.028
0.105
0.061
0.110
0.090
0.117
0.175
0.084
0.157
0.045
O.13S
0.107
0.26
0.066
0.089
0.113
0 . 1 0 5 -0.033 -0.041
0.030
0.114
0.067
0.110
0.097
0.127
0.190
0.091
0.171
0.049
0.146
0.116
0.28
0.072
0.095
0.121
0 . 1 1 3 .0.035
.0.044
0.033
0.122
0.072
0.128
0.104
0.137
0.204
0.098
0.184
0.053
0.15~
0.125
0.30
0.077
0.102
0.130
0.121
.0.038
-0.047
0.035
0.131
0.077
0.137
0.112
0.147
0.219
0.106
0.197
0.057
0.169
0.134
0.32
0.082
0.109
0.139
0.129
-0.041
-0.050
0.037
0.140
0.062
0.146
0.119
0.157
0.234
0.112
0.210
0.060
0.180
0.143
0.34
0.087
0.116
0.148
0.137
.0.044
-0.053
0.040
0.149
0.087
0.155
0.127
0.106
0.248
0.119
0.223
0.064
0.101
0.152
0.066
0.092
0.123
0.106
0 . 1 4 5 .0.046
-0.056
0.042
0.157
0.092
0.165
0.134
0.170
0.263
0.126
0.236
0.068
0.202
0.101
0.38
0.097
0.130
0.165
0.153
.0.049
.0.059
0.044.
0.166
0.097
0.174
0.142
0.186
0.277
0.133
0.249
0.072
0.Z13
0.170
0.40
0.102
0.137
0.174
0.101
-0.051
-0.062
0.047
0.175
0.102
0.183
0.149
0.196
0.292
0.140
0.262
0.075
0.225
0.178
0.236
0.187
-0.025
.0,031
0.42
0 . 1 0 7 0 . 1 4 3 0 . 1 8 2 0 . 1 5 9 -0.054 - 0 . 0 6 6 0 . 0 4 9 0 . 1 8 4 0 . 1 0 7 0 . 1 9 2 0 . 1 5 7 0 . 2 0 6 0 . 3 0 7 0 . 1 4 7 0 . 2 7 6 0 . 0 7 9
...........................................................................................................................................................................
51
BA \ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
].90
2.00
...........................................................................................................................................................................
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.01
0.015
0.013
0.008
0.002
-0.003
-0.006
-0.008
-0.016
-0.019
-0.022
-0.023
-0.020
-0.027
0.02
0.030
0.026
0.016
0.004
-0.007
-0.011
-0.016
-0.031
-0.039
-0.045
-0.046
-0.039
-0.053
0.03
0.045
0.038
0,024
0.006
-0.010
-0.017
-0.025
-0.047
-0.038
-0.067
-0.069
-0.059
-0.080
0.04
0.060
0.051
0.032
0.008
-0.014
-0.023
-0.033
-0,062
-0.078
-0.090
-0.091
-0.078
-0.107
0.05
0.075
0.064
0.040
0.009
-0.017
-0.028
-0.041
-0.078
-0.097
o0.112
-0.114
-0.098
-0.133
0.06
0.07
0.090
0.105
0.077
0.089
0.048
0.056
0.011
0.013
-0.021
-0.024
-0.038
-0.040
-0.049
-0.057
-0.094
-0.1(;9
-0.117
-0.136
-0.134
-0.157
-0.137
-0.160
-0.117
-0.137
-0.160
0.08
0.120
0.102
0.064
0.015
-0.627
-0.045
-0.065
-0.125
-0.156
-0.179
-0.183
-0.157
0.09
0.135
0.115
0.072
0.017
-0.031
-0.051
-0.074
-0.141
-0.175
-0.20~
-0.206
-0.176
O.lO
0,150
0.128
0.080
0.019
-0.034
-0.056
-0.082
-0.156
-0.105
-0.224
-0.229
-0.196
2.10
2.20
2.30
...........................................................................................................................................................................
C143~ VL
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
...........................................................................................................................................................................
52
2.10
2.20
2.30
14.90
-0,230
-0.566
-0.744
-1.302
-1.997
-2,310
-2.856
-2.955
-3.438
-3.547
-3.928
4.056
-3.971
-3.854
-2,852
-3.449
-2.707
-3.866
14.95
-0.231
-0.558
-0.747
-1.307
-2.003
-2.327
-2.866
-2.965
-3.448
-3.659
-3.941
-4.070
-3.984
-3.877
-2.872
-3.460
-2.716
-3.899
15.00
-0,232
-0.670
-0,749
-1.311
-2.010
-2.338
-2.875
-2.975
-3.459
-3.671
-3.955
4.083
-3.908
-3.800
-2.881
-3.472
-2.726
-3.012
15.05
-0.232
-0.673
-0.752
-1,315
-2.017
-2.343
-2.085
-2.085
-3.471
-3.683
3.968
4.097
-4.011
-3.003
-2.801
-3.483
-2.738
-3.025
15.10
-0.233
-0.675
-0.754
-1.320
-2.023
-2.351
-2.093
-2.993
-3.482
-3.695
-3.981
..4.111 -4.024
-3.916
-2.001
-3.438
-2.744
-3.938
15.13
-0.234
-0.677
-0.737
-1.324
-2.030
-2.3.58 -2.904
-3.005
-3.494
-3.708
-3.994
-4.]24
-4.038
-3.929
-2.910
-3.506
-2,753
-3.951
15.20
-0.238
-0.679
-0.759
-1.328
-2.037
-2.366
-2.014
-3.014
-3.506
-3.720
-4.007
-4.138
-4.051
-3.942
-2.020
-3.518
-2.762
-3.864
15.25
-0.236
-0.681
-0.762
-1.333
-2.(N4
-2.374
-2.823
-3.024
-3.517
-3.737
-4.021
-4.151
-4.064
-3.955
-2.920
-3.530
-2.771
-3.977
15.30
-0.238
-0.684
-0.764
-1.337
-2.050
-2.382
-2.933
-3.034
-3.529
-3.744
-4.034
-4.183
-4.078
-3.968
-2.939
-3.541
-2.780
-3.000
15.35
-0.23"/
-0.686
-0.767
-1.342
-2.057
-2.390
-2.942
-3.044
-3.540
-3.757
-4.047
-4,170
-4.091
-3.081
-2.940
-3.383
-2.789
-4.003
13.40
-0.238
-0.688
-0.769
-1.346
-2.064
-2.397
-2.952
-3.054
-3.352
-3.769
-4.060
-4.182
-4.104
-3.993
-2.058
-3.564
-2.78Q
-4.018
15.45
-0.239
-0.690
-0.772
-1.380
-2.070
-2.405
-2.962
-3.064
-3.563
-3.701
-4.073
-4.206
-4.118
-4.006
-2.968
-3.576
-2.807
-4.029
-4.042
15.50
-0.239
-0.693
-0.774
-1.355
-2,077
-2.413
-2.071
-3,074
-3.575
-3.793
-4.086
-4.219
-4.131
-4.010
-2.977
-3.587
-2.816
16.55
-0.240
-0.695
-0.777
-1.359
-2.084
-2.421
-2.961
-3.084
-3.586
-3.806
-4.100
-4.233
-4.144
-4.032
-2.987
-3.599
-2.825
-4.056
15.60
-0.241
-0.69"/
-0.770
-1.363
-2.090
-2.428
-2.990
-3.094
-3.590
-3.818
-4.113
-4.247
-4.158
-4.045
-2.997
-3.611
-2.835
-4.069
16.65
-0.242
-0.699
-0.782
-1.388
-2.097
-2.436
-3.000
-3.104
-3.609
-3.830
-4.126
-4.260
-4.171
-4.058
-3.006
-3.622
-2.844
-4.0412
15.70
-0.242
-0.702
-0.784
-1.372
-2.104
-2.444
-3.010
-3.114
-3.621
-3.842
-4.139
-4.274
-4.184
-4.071
-3.016
-3.634
-2.653
-4.095
15.75
-0.243
-0.704
-0.787
-1.377
-2.111
-2.452
-3.010
-3.124
-3.632
-3.855
-4.152
-4.288
-4.198
-4.084
-3.025
-3.645
-2.862
-4.108
15.80
-0.244
-0.706
-0.789
-1.381
-2.117
-2.460
-3.020
-3.133
-3.644
-3.387
-4.166
-4.301
-4.211
-4.097
-3.038
-3.657
-2.871
-4.121
16.05
-0.245
-0.708
-0.792
-1.386
-2.124
-2.467
-3.038
-3.143
-3.655
-3.679
-4.170
-4.315
-4.224
-4.110
-3.045
-3.668
-2.880
-4.134
15.00
-0.246
-0.711
-0.794
-1.380
-2.131
-2.475
-3.048
-3.153
-3.667
-3.891
-4.192
-4.328
-4.238
-4.123
-3.054
-3.680
-2.889
..4.147
16.95
-0.246
-0.713
-0.797
-1.394
-2.137
-2.483
-3.057
-3.163
-3.678
-3.g04
-4.205
-4.342
-4.261
-4.138
-3.064
-3.692
-2.898
-4.160
lfi.00
-0.247
-0.715
-0.799
-1,398
-2.144
-2.491
-3.067
-3.173
-3.690
-3.916
-4.218
-4.356
-4.264
-4.149
-3.073
-3.703
-2.g07
-4.173
16.05
-0.248
-0.717
-0.602
-1.403
-2,151
-2.499
-3.077
-3.183
-3.702
-3.928
-4.232
-4.369
-4.278
-4.152
-3.083
-3.715
-2.916
-4.166
16.10
-0.249
-0.719
-0.804
-1,407
-2.157
-2.506
-3.086
-3.193
-3,713
-3.940
-4.245
-4.383
-4.291
-4.175
-3.093
-3,726
-2.925
-4.199
16.15
-0.248
-0.722
-0.807
-1.412
-2.164
-2.614
-3.096
-3.203
-3.725
-3.952
-4.258
-4.396
-4.304
-4.188
-3.102
-3.738
-2.934
-4.212
-2.944
-4.225
CRI: f(DL)
VL=0.6-1.1
CRI
3
~f
VL:0.8
-+-
VL:0.7
---)K-- VL=0.8
VL:0.9
---X--- VL=I.0
--O-- VLft.L
-I
-2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
DL
F i g u r e 4A R e s i d u a r y R e s i s t a n c e Coefficient C o m p o n e n t
C R I : f(DL) f o r S p e e d - L e n g t h R a t i o 0.6 - 1.1
CRI: f(DL)
VL= 1 . 2 - 1 . 7
CRI
14
VLffii.2
FI
J
l
--t--
VL:I.3
-'~
Vl,: 1.4
Vi,:I.5
J
VLfi.6
--0-- VL=1.7
-2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
DL
F i g u r e 4B R e s i d u a r y R e s i s t a n c e C o e i f l d e a t C o m p o n e n t
C R I : f(DL) f o r S p e e d - L e n g t h R a t i o 1.2 - 1.7
53
CRI: f(DL)
VL= 1 . 8 - 2 . 3
CRI
VL= t.8
--+-- VL=t.9
+
VL=2.0
VL=2.t
....-)6- V L = 2 . 2
-0-- VL=2.3
50
I00
150
200
250
300
DL
F i g u r e 4C R e s i d u a r y R e s i s t a n c e Coefficient C o m p o n e n t
C R I : f(DL) f o r S p e e d - L e n g t h R a t i o 1.8 - 2.3
CR2: f(Bx/Tx)
VL=O.6- I.I
3.5
CR2
3
2.5
....
VL=O.8
. ~ . . ~ -~--4e"- - ' K
VL=0.7
"--)i(-- VL=0.8
1.5
~-
:-~-'*~.~:~.=~
VI,=0.9
0.5
0
-0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Bx/Tx
F i g u r e 5A R e s i d u a r y R e s i s t a n c e Coefficient C o m p o n e n t
C R 2 : f(Bx/Tx) f o r S p e e d - L e n g t h Ratio 0.6 - 1.1
54
5.5
VL=I.t
CR2: f ( B x / T x )
VL= 1 . 2 - 1.7
CR2
3.
/
Vl.= t.2
2.
-4-- VL=I.3
c~
-~"
VL=I.4
-~-
VLffit.5
--X-- VL=l.6
VL=t.7
~
1.5
2.5
3.5
5.5
4.5
Bx/Tx
Figure SB R e s i d u a r y R e s i s t a n c e Coefficient C o m p o n e n t
CR2: f(Bxfl~) for Speed.Length Ratio 1.2 - 1.7
CR2: f ( B x / T x )
VL=1.8-2.3
CR2
2.1
1.9
1.7
YLffil.8
~x
VL=1.9
1.5
~--
__.x__~-~-~'~
VL=2.0
VL=2.!
1.3
---X-- VLffi2.2
VL=2.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
Bx/Tx
55
CR3: f(Cp)
L-
CR3: f(Cp)
VL=O.8-1.1
VL= 1.8-2.3
CR3
CR3
+--+.__
--+-+-+-- --+_+_+__._.~+
., , ,., ,.I .
I , I I : , I : 1
II
VL=0.6
VL=I.8
71.=0.7
-')E- VL=0.a
--)E- VL=2.0
VL=0.9
VL=2.I
"-~
VL= ! 0
--~-
VL=2.2
VL=t.t
"0-
VL=2.3
0.52
0.56
0.6
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.56
0.6
0.64
Cp
0.68
0.72
Cp
CR3: f(Cp)
CR4: f(Cx)
VL=1.2-1.7
VL= 0 . 6 - 1 . 1
CR3
CR4
lrL= 1.2
VL=0.6
-q-- VL=I.3
--~
VL=t.,t
~
III
lit
III
VL=I.5
--X-- 71,=1.6
I+
"0-
0 52
0.56
0.6
0.64
0 68
0 72
I t,,
IrL=1.7
0.6
0.65
Cp
56
0.7
I I
0.75
0.9
0.95
-~
VL=0.8
-G-
VL=0.9
VL= 1.0
f I+-t--+-h+-+-
0 8 0.85
-@'- VL=I.I
Cx
VL=0.7
L_
CR4: f ( C x )
CR4: f ( C x )
VL: 1.8-2.3
VL= 1 . 2 - 1 . 7
CR4
CR4
VL: 1.8
VL= 1.2
V L : 1.9
--)[(-- YL:2.0
VL=I,4
--El- VLffi2.t
VL=i,5
[]
-9(-- YL=2.2
VL=I.6
-~"
VL=I.7
,,,
,,. . . .
I
i
0.75
0.8
0.65
0.7
0.85
0.9
0.95
-I-
0.7
0.6
YL=2.3
0.74
0.78
0.82
0.86
0.9
Cx
Cx
f(IE)
VL=O.6-1.l
CR5:
1.5
CR5
J
VL=0.6
-'{'-- VL=0.7
0.5
VL=O.8
VL=0.9
--K-- VL= t.0
VLfI.!
S
-0.5
10
t5
IE(DEG)
20
25
57
CR5: f(IE)
VL= 1 . 2 - 1 . 7
CR5
1.4
1.2
J
VL= t.2
0.8
--F-
0.6
VL= t.3
VLft.4
"I-
YLffil.5
0.4
VL= t.6
VL=I.7
0.2
G--.
--s-----e-~
[]
[3
0
-0.2
0
10
15
2O
25
IE(DEG)
CR5:
f(IE)
VL= 1 . 8 - 2 . 3
CR5
0.2
0
-0.2
VLffit.8
-0.4
-+--
VLfI.9
-0.6
VLf2.O
-0.8
---X-- VL=2.2
VLf2. t
YL:2.3
-I
_f
-1.2
- I .4
5
I0
ll
12
13
IE(DEG)
58
14
15
CR6:
f(TA)
VL=0.0-1.1
CR6
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Vl,=0.6
~"
VL=0.7
~--
VL=0.0
VL-0.9
0.
- -
--K-- VL=L0
VLffiI.I
0,
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
TA
CR6:
f(TA)
VL=I.2-1.7
CR6
0.0
0.5
0.4
0.3
VL= 1.2
--'t--
0.2
VL= L.3
VL==.4
VL=t.5
.~ .,.
0.1
0'.
,,
--
--X--
VLffi 1 . 6
-~"
VL= t . 7
u=;~.--~--!
-0.1
-0.2
0
0.05
0.l
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
TA
59
CR6: f(TA)
VL= 1 . 8 - 2 . 3
CR6
0.1
~'~
-0.1
VL=t .8
VL=I.9
"-)E'- VL=2.0
VL=2.t
-0.2
--X-- VL=2.2
VL=2.3
-0.3
-0.4
0
0.05
O.t
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
TA
CRT: f(TW)
VL=0.6-1.1
0.25
CR7
0.2
0.15
V'L=0.6
0.1
-4"- VL=0.7
/-
VL=0.8
VLffiO.9
0.05
S/
--tl.05
--X-- VL=IoO
VL=I.!
..~
--0.1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
TW
60
CR7:
f(TW)
VL=I.2-1.7
CR7
0"
J
VL:I.2
-"4-- VL:I.3
-0.2
VL:I.4
"~
-.41.3
VL= 1.5
--0.4
-tl.6
0
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.8
TW
CR7: f(TW)
VL= 1.8 - 2 . 3
CR7
-0.2
Vl~i.8
VI~2.0
-0.4
--B- Vl~2. i
--X-- V1~2.2
-0-- V~2.S
-0.6
-0.8
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
TW
61
62
this type of ship with a protruding bulbous bow was mainly due
to the reduction of viscous drag by decreasing the curvature of
the flow lines along the hull. The advantages of fight midships
for transom stem ships started to disappear as speed increased,
(see the comparison made for the ships with similar transom
geometry but distinctive Cx characteristics in Figure 11). This is
mainly due to slack midship section reduces the slope in the
afterbody bilge area for a given length of run, therefore, at high
speed the flow through the buttock will be straighter and easier.
WCF
1.6
1.5
1.41
Midships S e c t i o n Effect
on Worm Curve factor
(3)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.6
/
0.7
f
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
cx - 0 . 9 7 6
1.4
1.5
V/LWL'0.5
--
SHIP=
CX:
c x 0.766
--
WMEC 901
~768
UM 1094
~976
DL=
97.40
91.09
TA=
0.035
0.024
TW=
0.488
0.450
Cp:
0.587
0.533
Bx/Tx=
2.915
3.530
BA:
0.000
0.000
(4)
63
64
(5)
ie
Bx/Tx
(deg)
16
t"
3.1
14
/
/
/
i
12
l0
2.9
2.8
/
/
2.7
2.6
2.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
l.l
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2
2.3
V/LW~0.5
--Bx/Tx
..... IE
Cp, Cx
\
0
/r
o
/
i#
c
0.5
0.7
--CP
0.9
l.l
--CX
TA
1.9
2.1
2.3
..... TW
65
(9)
(6)
where,
(7)
For FP:
CD(APP) = 3.312 - 2.727 * LWL/1000 + 1.488
(8)
(Lwj1000) 2
66
PI * (Dp2/4)]
(lO)
(11)
where,
P.C. RED = 0.95 to 1.00
Obviously, even for a single type of ship, the P.C. values can still
vary over a fairly broad range. As a matter of facL it is seldom
that a single representation of P.C. vs. CT=~ can be made to
represent all types of ships. Equation (10) is merely a means for
P.C. prediction during the early stages of ship design. Despite
the fact that P.C. data is heavily influenced by ship type, the
predicted result from equation (11) is found to be within 5%
accuracy when compared to the experimental results. It is the
author's recommendation to use a propulsive reduction coefficient
(P.C. RED) of unity for ships with low displacement-length ratios
and unrestricted propeller diameter (propeller tips below the
baseline) and a lower P.C. RED value (0.95 to < 1.0) for ships
with high-displacement length ratios and restricted propeller
diameter (propeller tips above the baseline).
Unlike hull form and propeller geometry, air drag, hull fouling,
and propeller rotation (inward or outward), all play important
roles in ship propulsive performance. However, they are beyond
the scope of this study.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
The statistically based resistance and powering prediction
program CRTS3D.WKI represents the final product of this study.
The bare hull resistance prediction for transom stem hulls
developed under this investigation is considered to be satisfactory
in both statistical and physical measures. Extensive research on
appendage drag and propulsive coefficients still needs to be done.
The high playback and correlation values from Table 5 and
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
67
Appendix A
The Adverse Effect from Excessive Independent Variable
The adverse effect on using excessive independent variable(s)
in a regression model is clearly shown in Figure A-I. Both of
the displacement-length ratio and length-beam ratio were slightly
correlated to the residuary resistance coefficient in the low speed
range, in which they were also highly correlated to each other.
Historical data revealed that the displacement-length ratio should
be proportional to the residuary resistance at all speeds.
However, the inclusion of these two highly correlated parameters
in the regression caused DL to yield a false indication on
residuary resistance, particularly at speed-length ratios of 0.8 and
1.1, where "residuary resistance coefficient components"
decreased as displacement-length ratios increased.
CR1 : f(DL)
VL=O.6-1.t
CRt
i !T
VL=O.8
--~-- VL=O.?
"-)K-- VL=O.8
-El-
VL=0.9
-1.5
-2
0
50
100
150
200
250
DL
68
300
Appendix B
HP/IO00
200
Table B-1 and Figure B-1 are the CRTS3D.WKI resistance and
150
100
Table B-I
50
CRTS30.M(I Sample 0 ~ t p u t
///
/
DISTRIBUTION: 8A
9H[P
HI80-SPEEO OISPLACERENT HULL
HEK~RKS: W/80W 80ME
10
20
15
2,5
30
35
V(KNOTS)
INPUTS
....................................................................................................
"
10.9807
13.0905
15,2722
17,6539
19.6357
21 8114
23.0002
26,1809
I 30 28 3627
I 40 30.5444
1.50 32 7261
0 80161
O 80157
0 00154
0.00151
0 00149
0 80142
O 00146
0 00144
0 00143
0,80141
0.00140
O 5330
0 5489
0 6133
0 7006
0 6250
0 9402
1 0004
1 1462
t 5600
2,0491
2 3560
677
1160
18,67
2852
4214
5977
8014
10946
2 5147
31038
15719
22315
29494
718
595
776
761
654
541
541
-24
-92
-1124
-1244
-1610
-1811
202
22
37
60
89
126
174
1619
555
828
1179
1618
2153
2796
3554
4439
5460
231
476
586
2142
3257
4530
6174
8310
11800
14016
19563
26180
34295
6627
711
42865
349
300
381
PC
0 666
0 675
0 677
0 679
0.800
0681
0,601
O 681
EHP(BH)
2431
3171
4812
6672
9078
PRED
12210
0 674
63621
ERROR
(%)
39.2714
0 00137
2.5422
2 4729
44603
52005
-2150
7948
9435
052
1012
51592
60302
1.90
41 4531
0.00136
2 5092
61553
-2529
11007
1190
71310
O 614
0 614
105806
2 /'-",
2 OO 43 6348 0 00136
2.10 45.8166 0 00136
2 20 47,9983 0.00134
2 3524
2 3040
2 1923
69084
78907
88125
-2960
-3415
-3926
12942
14983
17226
1388
1607
1848
80465
92082
103273
0 675
O 615
0 616
110280
136336
152731
2 30
2 2236
-4406
19684
2111
118615
0 576
I15461
0 80133
101306
SHP
SHP
1.80
50.1601
55
H I G H - S P E E D DISPLACEMENT H U L L
PRED. E R R O R (%)
O 617
0.615
0.674
50
16159
20577
28826
38678
50829
0 679
---F-- EHPT
45
40
76586
89448
+---2
\~___
-4
/\
-6
-8
0.6
0 8
1.2
1.4
1,6
1.8
V/LWL^0.5
EHB(BH)
PRED
EHPT
SHP
69
Appendix C
Bare Hull Resistance Comparisons
Bare hull resistance tests for nine ships not included in the
database in this study were used to compare with the predictions
from the program CRTS3D.WK1 and three other well-known
statistically based powering prediction programs. Of the nine
ships, five were slender-displacement hulls and with hull form
parameters outside the boundary conditions of the pmgrams
NAUXCR and Holtrop. Therefore, the model test results from
these five ships were not used to compare with the above noted
programs. Among the rest of the four ships, two were transom
stem auxiliaries and the other two were cruiser stem ships. The
where,
ABS:
EHPp:
absolute value
predicted EHP
EHPT:
experimental EHP
N:
number of observation
Prediction Error:. (EHPp - EHPT)/EHP T
The predicted results from CRTS3D.WKI were comparable to or
even more accurate than the other programs (see Tables C-1 to
C-3). The abilities of CRTS3D.WKI to predict resistance for
cruiser stem ships in the low speed range were also shown by
Ships No. 8 and 9.
In addition to the previous comparisons, a study was conducted
to test the sensitivity of the program CRTS3D.WK1 on small
variations of hull form parameters. The target ships used for this
study were Kiss and Compton's Transom Stem Series (1989).
The prediction errors from CRTS3D.WKI were all within 1% to
2% deviation when compared with the experimental results (see
Figures C-1 and C-2).
to he primarily based on cruiser stem ships but not for the other
two programs.
All model tests were expanded to full scale according to the
1957 ITTC ship-model correlation line plus a 0.0005 CA value.
As Holtrop's database was believed to he expanded to full scale
according to the 1978 ITI'C ship-model correlation line, for
comparison purpose, all model tests that were used to compare
with the Holtrop's predictions were expanded to full scale in the
same manner.
The predicted "Average Error'' from
CRTS3D.WK1 when compared with the model test results were
all within 2% to 5%.
Ship NO. 1:
Emrged-Trensom01splaceaent HUll
I
l~eOictlon Error (~)
.................................................................
Paremters
l VL
l CRTS30
O[X:R
Shtp NO. 2:
USNALa~oeBulb Frigate
Ship NO. 3:
Parmeters
I VL I CRTS30 OIX~ It~XCI~ IO..'I~OP
.............................................................
I
IDL:
IO.66
3.31
54.150 10.60
0.34
17.49
Parmeters
3.677
0.90
-3.30
-8.66
Iex/Tx:
2.987 10.70
1.89
12.26
P=
0.~3
1.66
0.011 10.80
-0.66
8.26
0.777
1.10
-1.42
3.77
ICP:
Cx=
1.42
3.24
ICx:
0.750 10.66
-4.77
9.42
12.0
1.20
1.64
-5.26
liE(de0):
I].OO
-$.47
0.45
O.OOO 1.30
O.OOO 1.40
4.64
IZE(deo):
-0.66
7.95
IT^=
TA:
TIh
I "IT:
BA:
CkG:
0.660
O.OO
ITA:
8.o
0.050 11.10
I VL I CRTS3D
I..........................................................
I
10.70
-14.57
-1.20
lot:
66.823 Io.oo
-9.28
3.29
lex/Tx:
5.232 lO.oo .-2.96 -Z2.22
ICp:
0.on II.66
0.48
27.60
ICz=
0.783 11.10
0.40
21.42
8x/Tx:
lE(deg)=
.......................................................
NAUXCR HOLI~OPI
...............................................................
0.70
2,02
-6.74
DL:
51.880 0.80
-3.39
-8.01
14.1 11.66
O.OM I1.~0
4.12
0.50
14.93
23.50
3.74
8.40
I~:
0.505 11.20 I
-8.37
6.13
-O.OO
-3.32
3.18
-0.87
l~;
o.43e 11.4o
"0.91
42.25
FIT:
0.110 l l . 3 0
-3.4e
1.84
o.166 11.50
2.88
24.03
~9A:
0.125 11.40
-1.70
7.71
-4.77
-5.13
3.87
16.722 ~1.50
0.23
15.18
-5.83
-1.60
-6.70
-5.31
13.97
1.90
0.66o 11.66
17.223 11.70 1
11.66 I
-4.64
ll3e; =
In=
laA=
c~s..
-5.07
23.88
2.00
0.09
II.OO
2.10
0.92
I1.OO
1.50
O.OOO 1.50
15.833 1.70
1.80
11.50
11.7o
2.20
12.00
2.301
12.10
............................................................
70
11.66
12.oo
IZ.lO
12.zo
Iz.30
-3.26
-3.74
4.63
-3.21
-2.94
Shtp No. 4:
Shtp No. 5:
i
Predlctlon Error (k)
.................................................................
Parameters
I ~
I CRTS3D DOER NAUXCR HOLTROP
...............................................................
Shtp No. 6:
I
Prodlctlon Error (~)
...............................................................
I
Pnramters
I VL I CRTS3D
00CR
NAUXCR HOLTROP
Fleet Tug
[
Prediction E~Or (k)
...............................................................
I
Pereltere
~ VL I CRTS3D
DOCR
NAUXCR HQLTROP
Bx/Tx:
3,392
0,80
-2.51
-2.08
~Cp:
0,635 10.80
-7.42
-16.52
Cp:
0.812
0.90
-2.38
-3.53
ICx:
0.849 ]0.50
-4.15
-11,17
Cx:
0,795
1.50
-0.17
4.39
10.800 ]1.50
-3.28
-5.14
10.3
1.10
4.58
13.39
ITA:
o.2ol 11.1o
-0,22
-0.85
TAx
0.150
1.20
5.23
9.80
11~:
0.653 11,20
1.58
2.55
I .............................................................
I
IO.58 I -3.91
]OL:
158305 10.58 I -2.89
IBx/Tx:
3.333 I0.60 I
0.50
0.50
ICp:
o . ~ 10.85 I
1.47
0.49
ICx:
0.897 10.70 I
2.0~
2.46
]ZE(deo):
12.3 10.75 I
1.10
4.86
ITA:
0.035 1o.50 1 o.3s
-1.52
I~:
0.355 10.85 I
2.05
-2.89
T~:
0.528
1.30
6.17
9.18
[TT:
o.346 11.30
2,24
4.50
[TT:
0.095 i0.50 I
3.33
-4.77
TT,"
0.178
1,40
7.67
15.29
BA:
0.050 11.40
2.54
0.79
IBA:
0.050 10.95
2.12
-3.53
BA:
0.000
1.58
0.50
14.73
CWS:
15,658 il.58
2.30
8.92
15.559 11.50 I
-0.23
-9.58
U,'S:
10.152
1.60
5.77
11.50
11.6o
1.71
5.46
11.o5
-o.78
6.~
1.70
5.19
14.74
11.70
0.71
8.55
11.10
-1.13
-13.68
1.80
4.10
8.82
-0.25
10.21
11.15
-0.27
11.20
11.25
-0.15
-o.50
2.10
11.8o
11.9o
12.50
12.1o
2.20
12.20
4.24
12.30
4.33
I.............................................................
I
IO.SO I -3.75
0.50 I
OL:
IE(de9):
69.721
0.60 I
-10.39
-0.29
0.70 I
-6.58
0.18
IDL:
-25,75
mBx/Tx=
2.725 10.70
-9.88
-18.59
IZE(deg):
1.90
2.00
CliS:
1.21
1.13
11.30
.............................................................
2.27
2.30
...............................................................
I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.05
4.01
Ship No. 7:
Ship NO. 8:
I
Prediction Error (~)
.................................................................
Parameters
[ VL I CRTS3D 50CR NAUXCR HOLTROP
...............................................................
0.50
65.401
0.55
-13,21
Bx/Tx:
4.004
0.60
-7.85
Cp:
0.606
0.65
-8.74
CX:
0.928
0.70
-8.42
8.0
0.75
-8.98
TA:
0.078
0.80
-8.15
[ W:
0.801
0.85
-5.52
I TT:
0.125
0.90
-4.31
BA:
O. 149
0.95
-0.95
Ck3:
17,247
1.00
0.86
1.05
0.04
1.10
-1.23
1.15
-3.05
1.20
-5.46
DL:
IE(deg):
3.50
-1.09
`4.57
-6.51
I
I
Parameters
I VI. I CRTS3O
OOCR
Ship NO. 9:
I
Prediction Error (~)
...............................................................
Parameters
NAUXCR HOLTROP
I VL I CRTS30
-14.19
lot:
~DL:
-14.58
54.229 10.55
146.219 [0.55 ]
-3.84
-29.50
IBx/Tx:
lop:
3.162 10.50
IBx/Tx:
2,846 10.60 i
-0.52
-29.74
0.560 Io.85
ICp:
0.618 10.65 I
0.51
-19.00
-20.Z5
[Cx:
0,958 [0.7o
[Cx:
0.973 10.70 [
-2.99
-17,01
-27.65
IIE(deg):
-15.43
-23.02
ITA:
0.500 10.80
3.26
[IE(deo):
ITA:
7.5 [0.75 I
0.500 10.80 ]
-1.28
-0.34
-4.14
-21.42
ITW:
0.50o 10.85
2.40
3.25
-18.13
0.500 10.90
2.25
-14.91
0.50o IO.5O
0.50o 10.95
0.58
-15.70
1~:
leA:
0.22
ITS#:
in:
[BA:
0.050 10.05
-7.44
0.037 10.95
-1,31
7.47
-12.36
15.749 11.00
1.18
13.11
~CkS:
15.450 11.50
-6.50
8,01
-11.53
1.26
-10.52
-0.52
-12.16
11.o5
I1.1o
11.15
-5.2o
10.56
11.o5
11.1o
11.15
-17.43
11.20
5.14
1.30
... ............................................................
Average Error (~)
I
5.34
4.57
13.94
.................................................................
5.0 ]0.75
2.47
8.91
2.84
2.58
6.84
1.13
3.63
7.51
2.02
7.01
-2.72
-1.71
Resistance
-2.54
-13.41
-1.67
-12.64
13.84
-3.12
-14.25
9.42
-2.97
-5.23
-11.85
-9.50
-2.40
-5.25
-22.04
-0.04
1.63
-4.95
0.68
-12.21
-0.01
-17.83
4.o9
-1~.58
2.43
14,70
11.25
11.3o
.............................................................
20.64
41.85
ll.20
11.25
11.3o
1.25
NAOXOR HOLT50P
I.............................................................
I
I0.~0 I -7.11
-21.21
0.29
DDCR
I .............................................................
t
IO.SO
-21.20
6.20
3.42
and
Powering
.............................................................
Average Error (~)
2.89
17.44
Appendix D
Resistance Effects from Transom Knuckles and Hooked
Buttocks
3
....
~ l
n
~
o ~
~
~'mt't I t m m g t J
o v
~-at~ I m m c l t ~
xlqilql Deep D c l t t i ~ 1 d ~
IYIHm Imallw ~ t ~ c , f , on
/
.2\/
~ . *
~.
-2 ~
0'.
O CRTS~.i~I
~
~ ~
Oeep O r a f t
0
-]
I
14
i
18
;'
22
CRI33~.M(ISM11ow
i
,'
2i
,i
30
Draft
, ,
,,
34
,
38
42
v, (*Cm~TS)
Percent
horsepower
differences
for draft
iI o/t
venation
series
12
i~
SHIP'S DECK
%
LINE
I0
Pcldlcci~
o W
\o
m~
I
o
lido h a
CZTS30.kK1
k r r ~
i.~dit-t~on
Be~
C:RTSm.I~IMtde B~B
-2
-3
-4
I
t4
Percent
i'
IB
horsepower
- i~-'--r'~
22
differences
i-
20
30
v, (FNms)
for beam
&4
38
42
~
variation
AA_~_ LINE
GHOST STI~0
llrmmQ~
series
FOREBODY
SAME
AS PARENT,
13' WL.
BASE LING .
RmnWd 7Mmom
72
SIm~M B ~
%
. _-..--,.___
,T3rL
I
~1~ z o
M~ t ~
~,tttlt
~*tt t?
H o o t e d ButfOC/r
1.06
1.04
1.02
1
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.9
0.5
0.7
0.9
--
1.1
1.3
1.5
V/LWLA0.5
W / W O Knuckle
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
. . . . . W / W O Hooked
Figure !)-3 Resistance Effects from Transom Knuckles and Hooked Buttocks
73
Discussion
Donald McCallum, Member
[The views expressed herein are the opinions of the discusser
and not necessarily those of the Department of Defense or the
Department of the Navy.]
Mr. Fung is to be commended on this very interesting
and useful paper. Having had the privilege of working with
Dr. David Doust at the time of his trawler regression work,
at Teddington in 1960, I have an interest in improved
regression equations. Mr. Fung has some conclusions which
bear repeating:
a. the selection of parameters which have a good physical logic,
b. the number of parameters which make up the regres.
sion equation does not have to be large, and
c. the number of cross-coupled terms must be minimized.
Mr. Fung is also to be commended for Appendix C,
which gives nine worked examples of ships which are not
already in the database. I would like to remark that, although a goodly number of the nine predict well, about
half of them are off by between 5% and 13%.
I do have a few nitpicks with the paper, however. One
is that some graphics, at least in my copy, left something
to be desired. In Fig. 1, I find it hard to distinguish between
the different T values. Figure B-2 is hard to read in SHP.
Also in Section 4.4, he states that the "P.C. data . . . is
found to be within 5% accuracy when compared to the
experimental results." I would take exception with this
statement. My experience would indicate a larger margin
of accuracy, particularly in early stage design, where wake
is still unknown. Also, with the tip-unloading techniques
employed today for Navy ships, where noise is an issue,
propeller efficiency is sacrificed. Also does the author really mean 5%, or 5 points? The latter would equate to about
8%. In Appendix C I could not find Fig. C-2, although I
suspect it is above Fig. C-1. In Table 1, I would suggest
that Lin's 1987 NAVAUX equation should be included for
completen6ss.
-All in all, Mr. Fung has provided a clear exposition of the
principles, and pitfalls, associated with regression analysis.
Not only that, but he has given the working naval architect
a most useful tool for the prediction of resistance and propulsion during the early design stages. We are fortunate
indeed to have his years of-accumulated expertise within
NAVSEA. We look forward to incorporating his regression
equations into the NAVSEA Hull Design Database System
currently being completed.
Thank you for a landmark paper.
are not o r d e r e d in a c c o r d a n c e with the o r d e r of the speedto-length ratio values. Note, for instance, that in Fig. 5A,
the Cn c o m p o n e n t plots are o r d e r e d in a c c o r d a n c e with
the speed-to-length ratio values with t h e exception that
the Cn c o m p o n e n t values for V/(L) s of 0.8 are slightly
smaller than those for V/(L)5 of 0.7. F u r t h e r , note Fig.
7C, w h e r e the CR c o m p o n e n t values for V/(L) ~ of 1.9 are
considerably smaller than those for V/(L)5 of 1.8. Also,
again referring to Fig. 5A as an example, is t h e r e any significance to the considerable difference in Cn c o m p o n e n t inc r e m e n t b e t w e e n V/(L) 5 values of 0.6 and 0.7 as comp a r e d with the i n c r e m e n t s b e t w e e n V/(L) ~ values of say,
0.7 and 0.8, or 0.8 a n d 0.9? (Similarly, r e f e r r i n g again to
Fig. 7C, the Cn c o m p o n e n t value i n c r e m e n t s vary considerably.) Why, in some cases (for example, Fig. 8B), would
the CA c o m p o n e n t values b e o r d e r e d in a c c o r d a n c e with
the values of V/(L) ~(albeit with varying i n c r e m e n t s ) w h e n
in o t h e r cases (for example, Fig. 8C) such o r d e r i n g is not
indicated? Or is the m e t h o d o l o g y such that t h e CA compon e n t values for any given p a r a m e t e r at one value of V~
(L)5 n e e d not have any relationship to the CR c o m p o n e n t
values at any o t h e r value of V/(L)'5?
O n e of your initial observations is that the value of prismatic coefficient Ce had only a w e a k effect on residuary
resistance e x c e p t at the first " h u m p " region. A glance at
the Taylor's S t a n d a r d Series (TSS) d a t a [2] indicates significant effects of Ce on residuary resistance at V/(L) 5 values
less than, say, 1.1. Does your transom-stern hull d a t a yield
t r e n d s which differ from those i n d i c a t e d by the TSS data,
or do you feel that you are in a g r e e m e n t with the TSS data?
Your results on the significance of t h e value of m i d s h i p
section coefficient Cx, with r e s p e c t to residuary resistance
are, a p p a r e n t l y , in contrast with the results r e p o r t e d by
M u n t j e w e r f in 1971 [3]. Although the hull forms in question w e r e for high-speed cargo liners and h a d little or no
i m m e r s e d t r a n s o m area, this m o d e l test d a t a should provide a good evaluation of the effect of Cx on resistance
because the principal dimensions, block coefficient, b o w
bulb g e o m e t r y , and LCB location w e r e h e l d constant; thus,
the decrease in the Cx value was offset b y an increase
in the Ce value for those models. D e s p i t e the a n t i c i p a t e d
increase in resistance due to a larger Ce value, the hull
forms with smaller Cx values usually showed substantial
decreases in resistance, especially at the higher speeds; the
results can b e s u m m a r i z e d as in Table 7. Do you think that
the hull forms in your database differ e n o u g h from t h e
models tested at NSMB (by Muntjewerf), such that the
above-listed trends would not necessarily b e duplicated?
T h e trends for the value of w a t e r l i n e half-entrance angle
(i,) i n d i c a t e d by Figs. 8A, 8B, and 8C are of interest. T h e
Table 7
V/(L)5
Cx = 0.97
Cp = 0.547
Cx = 0.93
Cp = 0.569
0.95
1.028
1.0
1.04
1.039
1.0
1.12
1.081
1.0
1.21
1.089
1.0
1.30
1.112
1.0
As reported by Muntjewerf [3].
b Resistance/(resistance of hull w~Cx = 0.93).
Cx = 0.89
Cp = 0.594
1.002
1.014
0.972
0.920
0.920
75
--~-,
~
FIg. 14
,~,,~
ut~v
uuu
uu
mZllS
l.dlO
i150
I'illl
I110 "
/.00
Design lanes of prismatic coefficient, displacement-length quotient, and fatness ratio (from Saunders [5])
I~e
not greatly affect residuary resistance, as long as the transom area is kept to a minimum.
I have two more short comments on selection of hull
form characteristics. I think that it may be difficult to
achieve practical ship designs, for the relatively high speed
regime [ V/(L) n > 1.3] with the low values of B~ Tindicated
as being optimal in Fig. 12. And finally, I have spotted
points from your "suggested Ce" curve (Fig. 13) on the well
known "design lanes" plot presented by Captain Sannders
[5] this plot is reproduced in Fig. 14. Perhaps you could
comment on the differences. I believe that the differenees
at V/(L)z > 1.2 are due to the fact that the Saunders data
applies to high-speed ships (such as destroyers) whose hull
forms may be a compromise between optimization for top
speed and optimization for cruising speed.
In your discussion of appendage drag prediction, you
refer to the study carried out by Karl Kirkman, Dave Sanders, and myself. It is true our prediction errors were large.
In defense of that work, however, I'd like to point out
that our goal at that time was to improve the method of
DDG
154.0
DL
81.15
3.57
Bx/Tx
2.89
0.67
Ce
O.63
0.66
Cx
0.83
15.2
1E
12.00
0.18
TA
0.06
0.84
TW
0.27
0.38
TT
0.14
0
BA
0a
18.52
CWS
16.25
1.5
VZmax
1.5
"The subject hull has a large sonar dome (as tested). However,
it is so located that the sectional area at Station 0 is 0.0.
77
John
C. Daidola,
e I
4.e
4.0
s.e
ZaqNz~
o C~lO~/2,94'/~oDe%/990
ao
e.~
---
ITTC
Ca / o
C F x / o ~ 51/P 5c4z~
s, ~E~/e~'ss/o~t
~.o
/'~
/.o o.~ oo
0.2-
O<1-
a6
0/3
/,O
42-
AG
/.4
VL
Fig. 15 DDG correlation example (see Table 8 for hull
parameters)
Member
Since the author has emphasized the resistance and powering prediction of transom stern hull forms, I would like
to offer an example of a transom stern vessel showing (i)
significant influence of the transom on resistance and (ii)
where the effects of the transom could largely be accounted for by one of the author's hull form parameters
utilized to describe the transom geometry in his study.
Figure 17 shows the lines plan of this vessel [6]. The calm
water bare hull resistance was first calculated using the
results shown in Fig. 18 [7] providing data for various
smaller vessels. The data used for the subject vessel was
the curve representing the 180-ft supply boat, since the
subject vessel had a length between perpendiculars of 185
ft and other hull form characteristics of the two were in
close enough proximity to consider the supply vessel as a
predictor. The results of this prognosis are shown in Fig.
19 as well as the results of a model test performed at the
Davidson Laboratory of the Stevens Institute of Technology. As can be seen, the results are not reasonably close.
This led to an investigation of the difference exhibited,
resulting in Fig. F20. It was found that the difference in
resistance could be attributed to the author's hull form
parameter TA, the transom area ratio. Although specific
information was not available on the supply vessel, the data
from Fig. 18 were representative of a transom to midship
area ratio approximately 0.3, whereas the subject vessel
had a value in the order of 0.575. Further, utilizing additional data on small vessels with transoms [8] allowed Fig.
20 to be generated. As can be seen therein, the residuary
resistance coefflcent variation with transom immersion is
significant. With these data available, the differences between the tested resistance and predicted resistance could
virtually be fully explained, which would seem to indicate
78
~.o
~F=
- I
~ -
._~'0
4.5
4.0
ZEqe/z~
5.g--
No D a M
_5.0--
o c~/o ~,~ . o W o ~ _ ~ w
D4r~,
W/rH Z2:~
25--
2,@-
0
0
AS-
~o. . . .
~ ......
ZO -,5
0.~0
dZ
I///4z/9/
VL
Fig. 16
,11~1"u
=m.~'
1
lo,mm)., iV ~ . . . . = = . . . ~
iii=||i
Ilt )z|
Fig. 17 Lines plan [6]
&4 _
Ct' ".1~
".
1.,1--
o,-...
//
,Z
wtss~ st~its N
s/lP~ ~.wtJ -ass.
&o_
/
'
,.o,,,...o,,..,_.,/./ Z /
"'
/f /7 /
-
-ooct.s
,.,
,,a,.~(,
I/,7
~,(t. ~
L4 _
" -
k400(I. ~l
CP m'?4
~ootL
i~
I!
/ /
/ly
CP*"
,~j
2as Irr
TIIIAI I.J~
LO ~
I/
"
,,7
SHIP
Cp* SSI
.8
.e
I,
,8
I.O
Li
=3
that the transom area effect was the o v e r p o w e r i n g p a r a m e ter in this case.
Additional referenees
6 Daidola, J. C., Graham, D. A., Bister, J., and Hultberg, S. D.,
"Space Shuttle Booster Retrieval Platform for the United States
Air Force," SNAME STAR Symposium, 1982.
79
10
SHIP SPEED
Fig. 19
80
11
(KTS)
12
13
14
15
Vessel
m;::: !
-,
m:
eigc
0.882
.... L ~
o
.I
.~
.*
~n~rso~
Fig. 2 0
,5
Area/MidshfF
,7
Area
Author's Closure
The author wishes to thank the discussers for their interest and the points that they have raised. The c o m m e n t s
r e c e i v e d would certainly e n h a n c e the value of the m a t e r i a l
in this paper.
Despite proofreading, several mistakes, for example, inc o m p l e t e data on tables and figures, are still found in this
paper. The r e m a i n i n g part of Table 6J is now shown here;
Fig. G-2 is found above Fig. C-1 (exactly m a t c h i n g with Mr.
MeCallum's conjecture). I apologize for these oversights.
I would like to r e s p o n d to Mr. McCallum's c o m m e n t s
on the p r e d i c t i o n accuracy of the c u r r e n t study shown in
A p p e n d i x C, which stated that "about half of t h e m are off
81
Table 6J cont,d
...........................................................................................................................................................................
L'~ \ Vt
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
2.20
2.30
2.184
-2.198
-2.211
-2.224
"2.238
"2.251
-2.265
-2.278
"2.291
-2.305
"2.318
-2.332
-2.345
"2.358
-2.372
-2.385
-2.399
-2.537
-2.553
"2.569
-2.584
-2.600
-2.615
-2,631
-2.6&6
-2.662
-2.678
-2.695
-2.700
"2. 724
-2.740
-2.755
-2.771
-2.787
-3.125
-3.144
-3.163
-3.102
"3.201
-3.220
-3.240
"3.259
"3.278
-3.297
-3.316
"3.335
-3.355
-3.374
-3.393
"3.412
-3.431
-3.233
-3.252
-3.272
-3.292
-3.312
-3.332
-3.352
-3.371
-3.391
-3.411
-3.431
-3.451
-3.471
-3.490
"3.510
"3.530
-3.550
-3.759
-3.782
-3.805
-3.828
-3.851
-3.875
"3.898
-3.921
-3.944
"3.967
-3.990
-4.013
-4.036
-4.059
-4.082
-4,105
-4.128
-3.989
-4.014
-4.038
"4.063
-4.087
-4.112
"4.136
-4.160
-4.185
-4.209
-4.234
-4.258
-4.283
-4.307
-4.332
-4.356
"4.381
-4.297
-4.324
-4.350
-4.377
-4.403
-4.429
-4.456
-4.482
-4.508
-4.535
-4.561
-4.587
-4.614
-4.640
-4.~H57
-4.693
-4.719
-3.773
-3.796
-3.819
-3.842
-3.865
-3.888
-5.912
-3.935
"3.958
-3.901
-4.004
-4.027
-4.050
-4.074
"4.097
-4.120
-4.143
-2.962
-2.980
-2,998
-3.016
-3.034
-3,053
"3.071
-3.089
-3.107
-5.125
-3.143
-3.162
-3.180
-3.198
-3.216
-5.234
-3.252
-4.251
-4,277
-4.303
-4.329
-4.355
-4.382
-4.408
-4.434
-4.460
-4,486
-4.512
-4.538
-4,504
-4.590
-4,616
-4.642
"4.668
-2.412
-2.425
-2.802
-2.818
-3.450
-3.470
-3.570
-3.590
-4.151
-4.174
-4.405
-4.430
-4.746
-4.772
-4.166
-4.1~
-3.271
-3,289
-4 694
-4 721
18.20
-0.281
-0,813
-0.909
-1.591
-2.439
-2.833
-3.489
-3.609
-4.19T
-4.454
-4.798
-4.954
-4 851
-4.720
-3.496
-4 212
-3 307
......................................................................................................................................................................
-4 747
16 30
16.40
16.50
16.60
16.70
16.80
16.90
17.00
17.10
17.20
17.30
17.40
17.50
17.60
17.70
17.80
17.90
18.00
0 252
-0.253
-0.255
-0.256
-0.258
-0.259
-0.261
-0.263
"0.264
-0.266
-0.267
"0.269
-0.270
"0.272
-0.273
-0.275
-0.276
-0.278
0.728
-0.733
-0.737
-0.742
-0.746
"0.751
-0.755
-0.760
-0.764
-0.769
-0.773
"0.778
-0.782
"0.7~
-0.791
-0.795
-0.800
-0.804
0.814
-0.819
-0.824
"0.829
"0.834
-0.839
-0.844
-0.849
-0.854
-0.859
-0.864
-0.869
-0.874
-0.879
-0.884
-0.889
"0.894
-0.899
1.425
-1.433
-1.442
-1.451
-1.460
-1.468
"1.477
- 1.486
-1.495
"I,503
-1.512
-1.521
-1.530
"1.538
-1.547
-1.556
-1.564
-1.573
10.I0
-0.280
-0.809
-O. 904
- 1.582
82
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
-4.437
-4.464
-4.492
-4.519
-4.546
-4.573
-4.601
-4.628
-4.655
-4.~2
-4.700
-4.72;7
"4.76&
-4.791
-4.810
-4.846
-4.873
-4.344
-4.371
-4.397
-4.424
-4.451
"4.477
-4.504
-4.531
-4.557
-4.584
-4.611
-4.637
4.664
"4.691
"4.717
4.744
-4.T71
-4.227
-4.253
"4.279
-4.305
-4.331
-4.357
-4.~2
"4.408
-4.434
-4.460
-4.486
-4.512
4.538
-4.564
-4.590
-4.616
-4.642
-3.131
-3.150
-3,170
-3.189
-3.208
-3.227
-3.246
-3.266
-3.285
"3.304
"3.323
-3.342
3.362
-3.381
-3.400
-3.419
-3.438
-4.900
-4.927
-4.797
-4.824
-4 668
-4.694
-3.458
-3.477
2.10
CP
08
075
[]
07
J
065
;-F-~
B / T = 2 2 5 @ LDL
_L_
B / T = 2 2 5 @ HDL
~(
B/T=3 75 @ LDL
[]
B/T=375 @ HDL
FUNG
o 55
05
0 45
05
FJ3~
* T,
07
09
1 I
1:3
15
17
19
23
21
V/I,WL^05
LHL LOW DL, HDL HIGtt DL
Fig. 21
1 ~
0
05
06
07
08
09
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
VflLWL^O 5
-"
CR'I'S3D(W/O DOME)
--F-
CRTS3D (W/DOME)
Fig. 22
83
EHP
2000
1500----
_/
/
I000
,oo
0
04
f
+-'~ -'-4"-'~
06
08
12
14
16
18
V/LWL^O
--'-- (CRTS3D)-INTMED
(CRTS3D)-HEAVY
--"}- (TEST)-INTMED
4~- (TEST)-HEAVY
84
Additional references
9 Taylor, D. W., "The Influence of Midship-Section Shapes
Upon the Resistance of Ships," SNAME, Vol. 16, 1908.
10 Lahtiharju, E., Karppinen, T., Hellevaara, M., and Aitta, T.,
"Resistance and Seakeeping Characteristics of Fast Transom Stem
Hulls with Systematically Varied Form," SNAME 1991 Annual
Meeting, Nov. 1991.