Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 3, No 1, 2012
Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0
Research article
117
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
Million Metric Tonnes and the waste generated annually is around 18 Million Metric Tonnes but
hardly 25 % is being used mostly in cement production.
Figure 1: General Schematic view of blast furnace operation and Slag production
1.1 Study scope
In this study, concrete of M20, M30 and M40 grades were considered for a W/C ratio of 0.55,
0.45 and 0.40 respectively with the targeted slump of 10025 mm for the replacement of 0,
30, 50, 70 and 100 % of normal crushed coarse aggregate and fine aggregate with that of slag
aggregates(Crystallized and granular). These concrete mixes were studied for the properties
like density, workability (slump and compaction factor), compressive, split tensile and
flexure strengths.
2. Experimental investigation
2.1 Raw materials
In this investigation, Slag from local steel making plant, normal crushed coarse aggregate
from Panchgaon Basalt query, natural sand from Kanhan river and Portland Pozzolana
cement were used as shown in Figure 2and3. All the chemical and physical properties of the
materials are given in the table 1.
Table 1: Physical and chemical properties of materials
Slag (Crystallized)
Chemical Analysis
Constituents
(%)
Loss on
Ignition
Silica
4.00
10.80
Natural Sand
3.28
Natural
Aggregate
Physical
Properties
2.85
0.44%
0.55%
0.65%
1452
1322 Kg/cum
1468 Kg/cum
Physical Properties
Specific
Gravity
Water
Absorption
Dry loose bulk
Physical
Properties
2.65
118
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Volume 3 Issue 1 2012
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
R2O3
Fe2O3
33.60
15.97
Al2O3
Cao
MgO
17.63
30.20
7.02
SO2
0.54
Insoluble
matters
11.00
density
Soundness
Fineness
modulus.
Zone
Silt (Volume)
Abrasion Value
(%)
Impact Value
(%)
Crushing Value
(%)
Kg/cum
0.50%
-
0.55%
-
0.90%
2.64
20.8
22
II
2%
-
13.79
16
25.47
23
Slag (Granular)
Chemical Analysis
Physical Properties
Constituents
(%)
Specific Gravity
2.38
LOI
1.80
Specific Gravity
0.39%
Silica
30.20
Water Absorption
1058 Kg/cum
R2O3
20.20
Dry loose bulk
0.90%
density
Fe2O3
0.60
Soundness
3.14
Al2O3
19.60
Fineness modulus.
I
Cao
32.40
Zone
1.38 %
MgO
9.26
SO2
0.27
Insoluble matters
0.80
Cement-Portland Pozzolana Cement IS 1489 (Part 1) 1991
Physical Properties
Chemical Properties
Specific Surface
380 m2/kg
Total Loss on
1.40%
Ignition
Setting time Initial
195 minutes
Magnesia
1.40%
Setting time Final
280 minutes
Sulphuric
2.06%
Anhydride
Soundness-Le-chatelier
0.50 mm
Insoluble residue
26.0%
Auto Clave
0.06%
Compressive strength
34.9 Mpa
3days
7 days
44.2 Mpa
28 days
61.4 Mpa
Chloride
0.04%
Fly ash
28%
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
Figure 3: View of slag, normal crushed coarse aggregate and natural sand
2.2 Mix proportions
The mix proportions were made for a control mix of slump 100 25 mm for M20, M30 and
M40 grade of concrete for w/c ratio of 0.55, 0.45 and 0.40 respectively by using IS-102622009 method of mix design. For each grade of concrete, total five mixes were made by
replacing normal crushed coarse aggregate and fine aggregate with Slag keeping w/c ratio as
constant (control mix) by 0, 30, 50, 70 and 100 % replacements given in table 2.
Table 2: Replacement proportions of aggregates
Mix No.
Normal Crushed
Coarse Aggregate %
Slag aggregate-%
Natural sand%
Slag sand-%
100
100
2
3
70
50
30
50
100
100
0
0
4
5
30
0
70
100
100
100
0
0
100
70
30
3
4
100
100
0
0
50
30
50
70
100
100
Table 3 provides mix proportions details for control mixes of M20, M30 and M40 grade.
Table 3: Mix proportions of control mixes
Mix Proportions of Control Mixes
Ingredients (Kg/cum)
M20
Cement
348
Water (W/C ratio, 0.55,0.45 and0.40)
192
Mass of normal coarse aggregate
1187
Mass of fine aggregate
725
Super Plasticizer (PC based)
0.00
Total Weight
2452
M30
362
163
1225
748
2.17
2500
M40
407
163
1198
731
3.26
2502
120
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
The set of 100 mm cubes (3 nos.) were tested for compressive strength at 7, 28, 56, 91 and
119 days. Similarly, 100 mm cubes and 100x100x500 mm beams were tested for split tensile
and flexure strength respectively after 7 and 28 days time as per the IS-516-1991 Methods
of test of strength of concrete shown in figure 6.
3. Results and discussion
3.1 Compressive strength with coarse aggregate replacements
Compressive strength of concrete mixes of M20, M30 and M40 grade made by 0, 30, 50, 70
and 100% replacement of corase aggregate with slag aggregate was tested after 7, 28, 56, 91
and 119 days of curing for the w/c ratio of 0.55, 0.45 and 0.40 respectively. The results
indicated that compressive strength was higher by 2 to 4% in all the mixes at all ages. The
strength improvement was notably observed at 100% replacement level in the range of 5 to
7% compared to the control mix. The improvement was due to good adhesion between
crystallized slag aggregate and cement paste due to rough surface of slag aggregate as shown
in figure 7.
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
3.3 Split tensile and flexure strengths with coarse aggregate replacements
The split tensile and flexure strength at 7 and 28 days time for all the concrete mixes gave
higher results in the range of 6 to 8% over control mixes at all ages. The increase in strength
was due to the excellent rugosity of slag aggregate which ensured strong bonding and
adhesion between aggregate particles and cement paste as shown in figure 9.
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
Grade
4.6 Workability
The workability of concrete decreased from 0% to 100% replacement level in M20 grade
concrete by about 33% but in M30 and M40 grade of concrete it improved upto 30 to 50%
replacement level and later dropped at 100% replacements by about 8% in case of replacing
coarse aggregate with slag. The phenomenon could be due to the rough surface of slag
aggregated requiring more finer material to overcome the frictional forces. The workability
improved in higher grades of concrete (M30 and M40) due to potential availability of finer
124
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Volume 3 Issue 1 2012
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
materials. In case of replacing fine aggregate with slag the workability improved upto 50%
replacement level by 20% and later dropped at 100% replacement level as shown in figure 12.
Figure 12: Concrete density by replacing coarse and fine aggregates with Slag
125
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Volume 3 Issue 1 2012
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
126
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Volume 3 Issue 1 2012
Experimental investigation of using slag as an alternative to normal aggregates (coarse and fine) in concrete
Mohammed Nadeem, Arun D. Pofale
6. Lun Yunxia, Zhou Mingkai, Cai Xiao, Xu Fang, (2008), Methods for improving
volume stability of steel slag as fine aggregate, Journal of Wuhan University of
Technology-Material science edition, October, pp 737-742.
7. L. Zeghichi, (2006), The effect of replacement of naturals aggregates by Slag products
on the strength of concrete, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and
Housing), 7, pp 27-35.
8. Tarun R Naik, Shiw S Singh, Mathew P Tharaniyil, Robert B Wendfort, (1996),
Application of foundry by product materials in manufacture of concrete and masonry
products, ACI Materials Journal, 93, pp 41-50.
9. Xu Delong, Li hui, (2009), Future resources for eco building materials Metallurgical
slag, Journal of Wuhan university of technology-Material Science edition, June, pp
451-456.
127
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Volume 3 Issue 1 2012