Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Keywords
biotechnological applications, crystal structure,
heterologous gene expression, phytase,
phytate, protein engineering, transgenics.
Correspondence
Aihua Liang, Key Laboratory of Chemical
Biology and Molecular Engineering of Ministry
of Education, Institute of Biotechnology,
Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.
E-mail: aliang@sxu.edu.cn
Summary
Phytases are a group of enzymes capable of releasing phosphates from phytates,
one of the major forms of phosphorus (P) in animal feeds of plant origin.
These enzymes have been widely used in animal feed to improve phosphorus
nutrition and to reduce phosphorus pollution in animal waste. This review
covers the basic nomenclature and crystal structures of phytases and emphasizes both the protein engineering strategies used for the development of new,
effective phytases with improved properties and the potential biotechnological
applications of phytases.
Introduction
Phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases) catalyse the partial or complete hydrolytic removal
of orthophosphates from phytates (myo-inositol hexakisphosphates). Phytate is the principal form in which phosphorus and inositol are stored in cereals, legumes used in
commercial animal feeds and oilseeds; phytates constitute
c. 6090% of the total phosphorus content in plants
(Reddy et al. 1982). Phytate is hydrolysed by phytase into
one molecule of inositol and six molecules of inorganic
phosphate (Fig. 1). Unfortunately, phytates are not hydrolysed in the monogastric gut, and the phytate-associated phosphates remain unabsorbed, requiring the
exogenous addition of phosphate to avoid phosphorus
deficiency. In addition to increasing basic food costs, the
phosphates in the excreted phytates are available to
microbial soil consortia, which break them down to create phosphate run-off and serious environmental pollution (Greiner and Konietzny 2006). Furthermore, phytates
are a strong chelator of cations and bind minerals such as
Ca2+, Zn2+ and Fe2+ (Lopez et al. 2002; Vats and Banerjee
HO
Z n 2+
O P
O
OH
O
O P
O
O
Starch
NH3
Ca2+
O
O P OH
O
O
O P O
O
O
O P O
OH
OH
OH
Phytase
H
H
H
HO
Protein
CH2
O
O P O
OH
CH2OH
O
O
Starch
6 PO3
HO
OH
H
Ca2+
Protein
Zn2+
OH
Figure 1 The hydrolysis of phytate by phytase into inositol, phosphate and other divalent elements. The removal of phosphate groups by phytase
results in the release of metals, metal-binding enzymes and proteins.
grouped into 3-phytases (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate3-phosphohydrolase, EC 3.1.3.8), 6-phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate 6-phosphohydrolase, EC 3.1.3.26)
and 5-phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate 5-phosphohydrolase, EC 3.1.3.72). 3-Phytases, in fact, include
fungal and bacterial representatives that dephosphorylate
phytates at either C1 or C3. (Sajidan et al. 2004). 6-Phytases are frequently found in grains and oil seeds of
higher plants, while 5-phytases have been isolated from
alfalfa, beans, peas and Selenomonas ruminantium (Chu
et al. 2004). Recently, a new protein tyrosine phosphatase
(PTP)-like inositol polyphosphatases (IPPases) phyAme
was identified that defines a new class of IPPase based on
its stereospecific reaction of cleaving InsP6 at positions
1D-3 or 1D4 (Puhl et al. 2009).
On the basis of their pH optima, phytases can be
broadly divided into two major classes: acid and alkaline
phytases. Acid phytases include those enzymes belonging
to the histidine acid phosphatases (HAPs), purple acid
phosphatases (PAPs) and PTP-like class of phosphatases
(the latter of which was identified more recently). To
date, the b-propeller phytases (BPPs) from Bacillus are
the only extensively characterized class of alkaline phytase
(Kerovuo et al. 1998; Tye et al. 2002). Phytases also exhibit variations in their catalytic mechanism and consequently have been categorized into HAPs, BPPs, PAPs or
cysteine phytases (Mullaney and Ullah 2003). Several fungal, bacterial and plant phytases belong to the HAPs class
of enzymes (Wyss et al. 1999). All of these phytases share
a conserved active site hepta-peptide motif RHGXRXP
and the catalytically active dipeptide HD, unique to this
class of enzymes (Etten et al. 1991). This group of
enzymes catalyses the phytic acid hydrolysis in a two-step
process: a nucleophilic attack on the phosphorous atom
by the histidine in the active site, followed by hydrolysis
of the resulting phospho-histidine intermediate (Vincent
et al. 1992). Phytases from Bacillus species constitute an
exception: These enzymes share a sequence identity of
9098% each other but are unrelated to HAPs and other
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 2 Swiss-Pdb viewer-prepared molecular models from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)s website (http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), representing three types of phytases: (a) 1IHP, PhyA, a histidine acid phosphatase; (b) 1H6L Ts-Phy, a b propeller phytase;
(c) 1U26, SrPhy, a cysteine phytase.
2011 The Authors
Journal of Applied Microbiology 112, 114 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology
Table 1 Sources and properties of phytases, published during the last 10 years
Phytase source
Specific activity
Molecular
weight (kDa)
Temperature
optimum (C)
pH
optimum
Km
(lmol l)1)
Fungi
Aspergillus niger van Teighem
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus ficuum
A. ficuum
A. ficuum
22 592 U mg)1
66
39
76
655
675816
5255
556
50
67
58
25
262, 505
20, 55
13
50
606
09
730
295
124
51 U mg)1
2 U ml)1
700 80 U mg)1
909 U mg)1
1080 110 U mg)1
3066 U mg)1
1210 30 U mg)1
88
74
59
72
625
62
55
50
5560
40
5055
55
70
50
55
5560
5560
35
4050
45
54
5055
114
152 31
370
16 U mg)1
36 U mg)1
35 U mg)1
1269 U mg)1
769 U mg)1
99 U mg)1
310 U mg)1
2514 U mg)1
244 U mg)1
3960 U mg)1
2656 U mg)1
40
44
41
44
4146
47
453
69
45
38
45
48
6773
55
40
55
55
70
65
55
40
45
50
45
4045
45
55
55
67
70
6585
75
70
7080
70
45, 55
55
50
50
40
49
70
45
45
392
50
526
399
280
340
1280
165 U mg)1
330
80
51
40
50
65
46
45
5
30
64
70
60
70
40
45
02 U mg)1
65
54
88
22
7072
45
65
55
55
58
60
45
80
50
4550
830
334 31
81
61
54
55
65
52
45
290
246 38
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus oryzae
Ceriporia sp.
Cladosporium sp. FP-1
Peniophora lycii
Penicillium oxalicum PJ3
Rhizomucor pusillus
Trametes pubescens
Bacteria
Bacillus sp.
Bacillus sp.
Bacillus sp. KHU-10
Bacillus subtilis
B. subtilis
Bacillus laevolacticus
Bacillus licheniformes
Dickeya paradisiaca
Erwinia carotovora var. carotovota
Klebsiella sp. ASR1
Lactobacillus pentosus
Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis
Obesumbacterium proteus
Pseudomonas syringae MOK1
Pedobacter nyackensis
Yersinia intermedia
Yersinia kristeensenii
Yeasts
Candida krusei
Hansenula fabianii J640
Marine yeast Kodamaea
ohmeri BG3
Pichia anomala
Schwanniomyces occidentalis
Plants
Crude extract wheat
Hordeum vulgare
Lily pollen
Peanut
Soybean
Sunflower
Triticum aestivum L.
Reference
In addition, phytases from yeast have also been identified and characterized (motivated by their potential as a
feed additive for improving the phytate-phosphorus
digestibility in monogastric animals), such as the marine
yeast Kodamaea ohmeri BG3 (Li et al. 2008, 2009b), Pichia anomala (Kaur et al. 2010; Vohra et al. 2010) and
wastewater treatment yeast Hansenula fabianii J640 (Watanabe et al. 2009).
Organism
Gene of phytase
Functional information
Semi-rational design
Choice of method
Whole-gene randomization
Yes
No
Yes
High-throughput
screening available?
No
Yes
No
High-throughput
screening available?
available
partial
Semi-rational design
Directed Evolution
Rational design
Simultaneous
Random mutagenesis
ep PCR
Structral variation
Saturation
mutagenesis
and combination
Molecular modeling
and
Site-directed mutagenesis
Figure 3 Identification of novel phytases and selection of preferred experimental phytase engineering approaches, based on prior knowledge of
structure and function and the feasibility of a high-throughput screening system for screening. This figure is based partly on published articles
(Bottcher and Bornscheuer 2010; Chica et al. 2005), with slight modifications.
reported to be important for catalysis or substrate binding. Kinetic analysis of the phytase activity of the two
mutants (Q53R and K91D) showed a respective 22- and
15-fold increase in specific activity, and a 147- and 116fold increased affinity for sodium phytate. In addition,
the overall catalytic efficiency (kcat Km) of the two
mutants was improved 408- and 284-fold compared with
that of the wild type (Tian et al. 2010). A semi-rational
protein engineering strategy based on 3D structure and
sequence alignment was used to take advantage of the
desirable characteristics of A. niger NRRL 3135 phytase
(Anp) and A. fumigatus ATCC 13073 phytase (Afp); these
were chosen because they are quite different but possess
many mutually complementary properties (Bei et al.
2009). Another example for engineering of the thermostability of phytases is given by A. niger PhyA phytase; crystal structure comparisons with its close homolog, the
thermostable A. fumigatus phytase (Afp), suggested thermostability associations with several key residues (E35,
S42, R168 and R248) that formed a hydrogen bond network in the E35-to-S42 region, and ionic interactions
between R168 and D161, and R248 and D244. Finally,
four mutants showed improved thermostability; the best
response came from the quadruple mutant (A58E P65S
Q191R T271R), which retained 20% greater (P < 005)
activity after being heated at 80C for 10 min and had a
7C higher melting temperature than that of wild-type
PhyA (Zhang et al. 2007).
The E. coli phytase appA gene product was chosen as a
candidate for increasing thermal tolerance to promote the
survival of the enzyme during pelleting, because of its high
specific activity and specificity and its favourable pH profile
for gastric activity. To create an optimized phytase gene, site
saturation mutagenesis (GSSM) technology was employed
to identify mutations that increased enzymatic performance.
The technology, which generates a library of all possible single-site mutations in an enzyme, can target individual
aspects of a phenotype in association with an appropriate
high-throughput screening assay. In this case, the dual goals
of increased thermal tolerance and maintenance of high
turnover were established. Combining GSSM technology
with an assay that challenged all of the GSSM constructs
with a heat step revealed mutations that increased thermal
tolerance. Combining these mutations led to a phytase
Phy9X with an optimal phenotype for economic use as an
animal feed supplement (Garrett et al. 2004).
Another E. coli phytase (AppA2) was evolved to a thermostable phytase via epPCR. After a mutant library of
AppA2 was generated via error-prone polymerase
chain reaction, variants were expressed initially in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for screening and then in P. pastoris
for characterization of thermostability. Compared with
the wild-type enzyme, two variants (K46E and
N A, not applicable.
3D structure and
PCR overlap assembly
sequence alignment
Two fungal
phytases
Combination of desirable
properties
Structure-guided
Whole-gene synthesis
consensus approach
Mn2+-dNTP random
mutation method
NA
Protease-resistant
phytase from
Penicillium sp.
Error-prone PCR,
high-throughput
screening
NA
Improve thermostability
Escherichia
coli (AppA)
Site-directed
mutagenesis
strategy
Sequence alignment
E. coli (AppA)
Improve activity
A. niger 113
(PhyI1s)
3D structure and
DNA shuffling
sequence alignment
Improve thermostability
Site-directed
mutagenesis
Crystal structure
Improve thermostability
Conclusions comments
Aspergillus
niger phytase
(PhyA)
Aspergillus
terreus phytase
Design
Project goal
Target
Viader-Salvado
et al. (2010)
References
involved in the commercial production of phytases. Alternatively, transgenic plants could be used as bioreactors
for the production of phytase as a supplement. Meanwhile, transgenic animals producing endogenous phytase
along with other digestive enzymes are known to increase
the bioavailability of plant phytate, which in turn leads to
reduced phosphorus output in manure.
Phytases have been expressed in several dicotyledonous
plants like tobacco (Pen et al. 1993), Arabidopsis thaliana
(Richardson et al. 2001; Xiao et al. 2005), alfalfa (Ullah
et al. 2002), canola (Ponstein et al. 2002), soybean (Chiera
et al. 2004) and so on. Aspergillus phytase expressed in
maize seeds exhibited an increase in iron bioavailability, as
evidenced by in vitro digestion and Caco-2 cell model studies (Drakakaki et al. 2005). Aspergillus fumigatus phytase
expressed in tobacco exhibited high thermostability and
retained 287% of the initial activity, even after incubation
at 90C for 15 min (Wang et al. 2007). The expression of
B. subtilis phytase in tobacco indicated that the Bacillus
phytase transgene could only improve the phytate-phosphorus uptake by transgenic plants under sterilized conditions, and its effectiveness might be limited under natural
conditions because of microbial decomposition and mineral fixation. The microbial community in the rhizosphere
appears to be resistant to the impact of single-gene changes
in plants designed to alter rhizosphere biochemistry and
nutrient cycling (Kong et al. 2005; George et al. 2009).
Overexpression of heterologous phytases in transgenic
potato not only offers an ideal feed additive for improving
phytate-P digestibility in monogastric animals, but also
improves tuber yield, enhances P acquisition from organic
fertilizers and has the potential for phytoremediation
(Hong et al. 2008). Transgenic soybean plants expressing
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PAPs (AtPAP15) exhibited enhanced bioavailability of phosphorus (Wang et al.
2009). In plants, the phosphate-absorption sites are in the
root system, especially the root hairs. It is therefore better
for the phytases ectopically expressed in transgenic plants
to be secreted in the rhizosphere where the phytate and its
derivatives are degraded by the biochemical reactions
involved in the encoded phytases. Therefore, in transgenic
soybean plants in which the A. ficuum phytase (AfPhyA)
was integrated, a promoter from the Arabidopsis Pky10
gene and the carrot extensin signal peptide were used to
drive the root-specific and secretory expression of the AfPhyA gene. The phytase activity and inorganic phosphate
levels in transgenic soybean root secretions were
47 U mg)1 protein and 439 lmol l)1, respectively, compared with 08 U mg)1 protein and 120 lmol l)1 in control soybeans, suggesting that the transgenic techniques
could be of great value for the generation of crop varieties
with high P-use efficiency in the future (Li et al. 2009a).
Expression levels of heterologous phytases in diverse transgenic plants are presented in Table 3.
Transgenic mice and pigs have been generated by overexpressing phytase in their salivary glands (Golovan et al.
2001a,b). A transgenic mouse model has been developed
with an appA phytase gene from E. coli, driven by the
upstream promoter of a pig parotid secretory protein
gene. Expression of salivary phytase reduced faecal phytates by 85 and 125% in two transgenic mouse lines
(Yin et al. 2006). The transgenic Enviropig, expressing
E. coli appA phytase, could secrete active phytase into its
saliva and showed a substantial reduction (60%) in the
excretion of phosphorus compared with nontransgenic
animals (Forsberg et al. 2003).
Source of phytase
Aspergillus ficuum
Aspergillus niger
A. niger
A. niger
A. ficuum
Escherichia coli
Schwanniomyces occidentalis
A. niger
Aspergillus awamori
A. ficuum
Arabidopsis thaliana
A. niger
A. ficuum
Aspergillus fumigatus
A. niger
A. niger
Tissues expressed
Leaves
Seeds
Seeds
Cell suspension culture
Leaves
Plant
Leaves
Cell suspension culture
Seeds
Roots
Roots
Leaves
Leaves
Cell suspension culture
Seeds
Shoots
Enzyme activity
)1
15 FTU per g
305 nKat g)1 per FW
References
Ullah et al. (2002)
Peng et al. (2006)
Chen et al. (2008)
Pires et al. (2008)
Ullah et al. (2003)
Hong et al. (2008)
Hamada et al. (2005b)
Li et al. (1997)
Gao et al. (2007)
Li et al. (2009a)
Wang et al. (2009)
Verwoerd et al. (1995)
Ullah et al. (1999)
Wang et al. (2007)
Pen et al. (1993)
George et al. (2004)
10
Chen, R., Xue, G., Chen, P., Yao, B., Yang, W., Ma, Q., Fan,
Y., Zhao, Z. et al. (2008) Transgenic maize plants expressing a fungal phytase gene. Transgenic Res 17, 633643.
Chica, R.A., Doucet, N. and Pelletier, J.N. (2005) Semi-rational
approaches to engineering enzyme activity: combining the
benefits of directed evolution and rational design. Curr
Opin Biotechnol 16, 378384.
Chiera, J.M., Finer, J.J. and Grabau, E.A. (2004) Ectopic
expression of a soybean phytase in developing seeds of
Glycine max to improve phosphorus availability. Plant Mol
Biol 56, 895904.
Cho, J., Lee, C., Kang, S., Lee, J., Lee, H., Bok, J., Woo, J.,
Moon, Y. et al. (2005) Molecular cloning of a phytase gene
(phy M) from Pseudomonas syringae MOK1. Curr Microbiol 51, 1115.
Choi, Y.M., Suh, H.J. and Kim, J.M. (2001) Purification and
properties of extracellular phytase from Bacillus sp. KHU10. J Protein Chem 20, 287292.
Chu, H.M., Guo, R.T., Lin, T.W., Chou, C.C., Shr, H.L., Lai,
H.L., Tang, T.Y., Cheng, K.J. et al. (2004) Structures of
Selenomonas ruminantium phytase in complex with
persulfated phytate: DSP phytase fold and mechanism for
sequential substrate hydrolysis. Structure 12, 20152024.
De Angelis, M., Gallo, G., Corbo, M.R., McSweeney, P.L.,
Faccia, M., Giovine, M. and Gobbetti, M. (2003) Phytase
activity in sourdough lactic acid bacteria: purification and
characterization of a phytase from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Int J Food Microbiol 87, 259270.
Dionisio, G., Holm, P. and Brinch-Pendersen, H. (2007)
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare
L.) multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatases (MINPPs) are phytases expressed during grain filling and germination. Plant Biotechnol J 5, 325338.
Dionisio, G., Madsen, C.K., Holm, P.B., Welinder, K.G.,
Jorgensen, M., Stoger, E., Arcalis, E. and Brinch-Pedersen,
H. (2011) Cloning and characterization of purple acid
phosphatase phytases from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Maize (Zea maize L.) and
Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol 156, 10871100.
Drakakaki, G., Marcel, S., Glahn, R.P., Lund, E.K., Pariagh, S.,
Fischer, R., Christou, P. and Stoger, E. (2005) Endospermspecific co-expression of recombinant soybean ferritin and
aspergillus phytase in maize results in significant increases
in the levels of bioavailable iron. Plant Mol Biol 59,
869880.
Etten, R.L.V., Davidson, R., Stevis, P.E., MacArthur, H. and
Moore, D.L. (1991) Covalent structure, disulfide bonding,
and identification of reactive surface and active site residues of human prostatic acid phosphatase. J Biol Chem
266, 23132319.
Farhat, A., Chouayekh, H., Ben Farhat, M., Bouchaala, K. and
Bejar, S. (2008) Gene cloning and characterization of a
thermostable phytase from Bacillus subtilis US417 and
assessment of its potential as a feed additive in comparison
with a commercial enzyme. Mol Biotechnol 40, 127135.
Forsberg, C.W., Phillips, J.P., Golovan, S.P., Fan, M.Z., Meidinger, R.G., Ajakaiye, A., Hilborn, D. and Hacker, R.R.
(2003) The Enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management advances in a regulated
environment: the leading edge of change in the pork
industry. J Anim Sci 81, E68E77.
Fu, D., Huang, H.Q., Luo, H.Y., Wang, Y.R., Yang, P.L.,
Meng, K., Bai, Y.G., Wu, N.F. et al. (2008a) A highly pHstable phytase from Yersinia kristeensenii: cloning, expression, and characterization. Enzyme Microb Technol 42,
2008.
Fu, S., Sun, J., Qian, L. and Li, Z. (2008b) Bacillus phytases:
present scenario and future perspectives. Appl Biochem
Biotechnol 151, 18.
Gao, X.R., Wang, G.K., Su, Q., Wang, Y. and An, L.J. (2007)
Phytase expression in transgenic soybeans: stable transformation with a vector-less construct. Biotechnol Lett 29,
17811787.
Garrett, J.B., Kretz, K.A., ODonoghue, E., Kerovuo, J., Kim,
W., Barton, N.R., Hazlewood, G.P., Short, J.M. et al.
(2004) Enhancing the thermal tolerance and gastric performance of a microbial phytase for use as a phosphatemobilizing monogastric-feed supplement. Appl Environ
Microbiol 70, 30413046.
George, T., Richardson, A., Hadobas, P. and Simpson, R.
(2004) Characterization of transgenic Trifolium subterraneum L. which expresses phyA and releases extracellular
phytase: growth and P nutrition in laboratory media and
soil. Plant Cell Environ 27, 13511361.
George, T.S., Richardson, A.E., Li, S.S., Gregory, P.J. and Daniell, T.J. (2009) Extracellular release of a heterologous phytase from roots of transgenic plants: does manipulation of
rhizosphere biochemistry impact microbial community
structure? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70, 433445.
Gibson, D.M. (1987) Production of extracellular phytase from
Aspergillus ficuum on starch media. Biotechnol Lett 9, 305
310.
Golovan, S., Hayes, M., Phillips, J. and Forsberg, C. (2001a)
Transgenic mice expressing bacterial phytase as a model
for phosphorus pollution control. Nat Biotechnol 19, 429
433.
Golovan, S.P., Meidinger, R.G., Ajakaiye, A., Cottrill, M.,
Wiederkehr, M.Z., Barney, D.J., Plante, C., Pollard, J.W.
et al. (2001b) Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce
low-phosphorus manure. Nat Biotechnol 19, 741745.
Gonnety, J.T., Niamke, S., Meuwiah Faulet, B., NGuessan
Kouadio, E.J. and Kouame, L.P. (2007) Purification,
kinetic properties and physicochemical characterization of
a novel acid phosphatase (AP) from germinating peanut
(Arachis hypogaea) seed. Ital J Biochem 56, 149157.
Greiner, R. and Konietzny, U. (2006) Phytase for food application. Food Technol Biotechnol 44, 125140.
Gu, W., Huang, H., Meng, K., Yang, P., Fu, D., Luo, H.,
Wang, Y., Yao, B. et al. (2009) Gene cloning, expression,
and characterization of a novel phytase from Dickeya paradisiaca. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 157, 113123.
Gulati, H.K., Chadha, B.S. and Saini, H.S. (2007) Production
and characterization of thermostable alkaline phytase from
Bacillus laevolacticus isolated from rhizosphere soil. J Ind
Microbiol Biotechnol 34, 9198.
Hamada, J.S. (1996) Isolation and identification of the multiple forms of soybean phytases. J Am Oil Chem Soc 73,
11431151.
Hamada, A., Yamaguchi, K., Ohnishi, N., Harada, M., Nikumaru, S. and Honda, H. (2005) High-level production of
yeast (Schwanniomyces occidentalis) phytase in transgenic
rice plants by a combination of signal sequence and codon
modification of the phytase gene. Plant Biotechnol J 3, 43
55.
Hegeman, C.E. and Grabau, E.A. (2001) A novel phytase with
sequence similarity to purple acid phosphatases is
expressed in cotyledons of germinating soybean seedlings.
Plant Physiol 126, 15981608.
Hong, Y.F., Liu, C.Y., Cheng, K.J., Hour, A.L., Chan, M.T.,
Tseng, T.H., Chen, K.Y., Shaw, J.F. et al. (2008) The sweet
potato sporamin promoter confers high-level phytase
expression and improves organic phosphorus acquisition
and tuber yield of transgenic potato. Plant Mol Biol 67,
347361.
Howson, S. and Davis, R. (1983) Production of phytate hydrolyzing enzymes by some fungi. Enzyme Microb Technol 5,
377389.
Huang, H., Luo, H., Yang, P., Meng, K., Wang, Y., Yuan, T.,
Bai, Y. and Yao, B. (2006) A novel phytase with preferable
characteristics from Yersinia intermedia. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 350, 884889.
Huang, H., Luo, H., Wang, Y., Fu, D., Shao, N., Yang, P.,
Meng, K. and Yao, B. (2009a) Novel low-temperatureactive phytase from Erwinia carotovora var. carotovota
ACCC 10276. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19, 10851091.
Huang, H., Shao, N., Wang, Y., Luo, H., Yang, P., Zhou, Z.,
Zhan, Z. and Yao, B. (2009b) A novel beta-propeller
phytase from Pedobacter nyackensis MJ11 CGMCC 2503
with potential as an aquatic feed additive. Appl Microbiol
Biotechnol 83, 249259.
Hubel, F. and Beck, E. (1996) Maize root phytase (purification,
characterization, and localization of enzyme activity and
its putative substrate). Plant Physiol 112, 14291436.
Jermutus, L., Tessier, M., Pasamontes, L., van Loon, A.P. and
Lehmann, M. (2001) Structure-based chimeric enzymes as
an alternative to directed enzyme evolution: phytase as a
test case. J Biotechnol 85, 1524.
Jog, S.P., Garchow, B.G., Mehta, B.D. and Murthy, P.P. (2005)
Alkaline phytase from lily pollen: investigation of biochemical properties. Arch Biochem Biophys 440, 133140.
Kaur, P., Singh, B., Boer, E., Straube, N., Piontek, M.,
Satyanarayana, T. and Kunze, G. (2010) Pphy a
cell-bound phytase from the yeast Pichia anomala:
11
12
13
14