Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, RAS, Leninsky pr. 31, Moscow, 119991, Russia
Tel. +7 (095) 952-2487; Fax +7 (095) 954-1279; email: stenina@pochta.ru
b
University Montpellier 2 IEM, CC 047, Place Eugene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
c
Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, RAS, Leninsky pr. 29, Moscow, 117912, Russia
Received 18 September 2003; accepted 20 February 2004
Abstract
Transport phenomena in Nafion-117 perfluorosulphonic membranes have been studied by different techniques.
Membrane electric conductivity has been measured under alternative current as a function of the equilibrating
concentrations of MCl (M = Li, Na, K) and HCl solutions. Conductivities were found to increase for lithium and
sodium membrane forms and decrease for the potassium form with an electrolyte concentration increase. The obtained
data were compared with the results of diffusion permeability, ion-exchange kinetics, 7Li and 35Cl NMR measurements.
In all cases permeability increased with electrolyte concentration growth. Diffusion coefficients and transport numbers
for different counter- and co-ions were determined. The obtained data are discussed with the use of the two-phase
membrane structure model. The selectivity of membrane sorption was found to increase with growth of cation radius.
Keywords: Diffusion; Nafion-117 membrane; Transport process; NMR
1. Introduction
Membrane materials are more and more used
in a wide range of applications like substance
separation processes, wastewater treatment, and
fuel cell development [13]. Nafion membranes,
uncross-linked, perfluorinated polymers containing a considerable number of functional HSO3groups, have attracted much attention. These
membranes show high chemical stability at high
*Corresponding author.
0011-9164/04/$ See front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
50
where V is the chamber volume, l is the membrane thickness, S is the membrane area, and c is
the concentration.
Potentiometric titration was performed with a
Mettler Delta 340 pH millivoltmeter. Portions of
a 0.1 M MOH solution were added step by step to
the membrane in acid form contacted with 0.1 M
and 1 M MCl solutions, and pH was measured
every 3 s.
7
Li and 35Cl NMR spectra were obtained on a
Bruker MSL-300 spectrometer at 116.6 MHz [90
pulse (10.5 s), recycling time 3 s, 8 scans] and
29.31 MHz [90 pulse (7.2 s), recycling time
3 s, 400 scans], respectively. Samples were spun
at 37 kHz at a magic angle. Chemical shifts were
given relative to 0.1 M aqueous LiCl. 7Li NMRrelaxation data were obtained using the T1-Inversion Recovery Pulse Program. Spin relaxation
times (T1) were calculated from the relation:
2. Experimental
I = I0 [1 ! 2 exp (!t/T1)]
Measurements were made using the Nafion117 membrane, which is a homogeneous membrane produced by Dupont de Nemours (USA).
Water content was determined as the water mass/
dry sample mass ratio with the use of the gravimetric method (water was extracted at 105C).
Membrane conductivity was measured by the
mercury-contact technique in the frequency range
from 10 Hz to 100 kHz [15,16]. Membranes were
equilibrated with MCl (M = Li, Na, K) solutions
at concentrations from 0 to 3 M or with solutions
of 0.5 M MCl and HCl in the concentration range
from 0 to 0.5 M. Diffusion permeability was analyzed in a cell of periodic service. The sorbed
electrolyte was transferred through the membrane
to a distilled water (or HCl solution) filled compartment. The electrolyte transfer rate was
controlled by atom-absorption spectroscopy.
Diffusion permeability (P) was calculated from
the relation:
P = V l )c / Sc )t
(1)
(2)
51
Fig. 1. Water content (mol H2O/mol SO3) in the Nafion117 membrane equilibrated with LiCl (a), NaCl (b) and
KCl (c) solutions of various concentrations.
52
(4)
(5)
Fig. 3. Conductivity of the Nafion-117 membrane equilibrated with solutions containing 0.5 M LiCl (a),
NaCl (b), KCl (c) and HCl of various concentrations.
Calculated conductivity of Nafion-117 membranes equilibrated with solutions containing 0.5 M NaCl and HCl of
various concentrations (solid line) and experimental data
points (open circles) (d).
6 (H+) ! F] / [F
6(H+) ! F
6(M+)]
c(M+)/cs = [F
(6)
(7)
53
Table 1
Diffusion coefficients for some ions in Nafion-117 membranes
Techniques
Electrolyte solution
Ion
D, cm2/s
Conductivity measurements
1N HCl
H+
5.310!6
1N LiCl
Li+
1.3110!6
0.1N LiCl
Li+
1.1510!6
1N NaCl
Na+
1.5810!6
0.1N NaCl
Na+
1.3110!6
1N KCl
K+
8.610!7
0.1N KCl
K+
1.0510!6
H+ + Li+
4.310!6
H+ + Na+
3.710!6
H+ + K+
Cl!
Cl!
Cl!
Cl!
Cl!
Cl!
SO42!
NO3!
SO42!
SO42!
Li+
Na+
K+
Na+
1.8510!6
4.910!8
1.410!8
5.510!8
2.110!8
1.210!7
1.710!8
4.610!9
6.610!8
8.110!9
1.110!8
1.310!6
1.710!6
1.510!6
(1.21 0.04)10!6
K+
(1.02 0.02)10!6
Diffusion permeability
(8)
54
(9)
Fig. 4. Diffusion permeability of the Nafion-117 membrane equilibrated with LiCl (a), NaCl (b) and KCl (c)
solutions as a function of MCl concentration.
(10)
where Zi and Di are the charge and diffusion coefficient of ions i. Calculated values of transport
numbers are given in Table 2. t! values strongly
increase with the growth of cation radii and concentration of the electrolyte solution.
In the case of electrolytes transferred through
the membrane to the acid filled compartment, the
charge balance can be reached not only by a
parallel diffusion of cations and anions, but also
mostly by a mutual diffusion of protons and alkali
metal ions. The diffusion coefficients decrease in
the series D(H+) > D(M+) o D(Cl!), and the contribution of anion diffusion can be neglected. In
this case the diffusion permeability can be given
as:
P(M/H) = D(H+) D(M+)/[D(H+)
+ D(M+)] o D(M+)
(11)
55
Table 2
Transport numbers of some ions in Nafion-117
membranes
Electrolyte solution
t+
t!
1N LiCl
0.1N LiCl
1N NaCl
0.1N NaCl
1N KCl
0.1N KCl
1N Li2SO4
1N NaNO3
1N Na2SO4
1N K2SO4
0.965
0.988
0.967
0.984
0.888
0.984
0.993
0.961
0.990
0.977
0.035
0.012
0.033
0.016
0.112
0.016
0.007
0.039
0.010
0.023
(12)
Fig. 5. 7Li MAS NMR spectrum of a Nafion-117 membrane equilibrated with 1 M LiCl solution (a). 35Cl MAS
NMR spectrum of a Nafion-117 membrane equilibrated
with 1 M LiCl solution (b). 35Cl MAS NMR spectrum of
1 M LiCl solution (c).
56
a local cation environment change while conductivity is mainly controlled by cation transfer
in membrane channels. <c calculated from NMR
data is mostly determined by the jump frequency
of lithium ions located in membrane micropores.
The composition of solution in membrane micropores is close to that of the external solution.
Thus, the diffusion coefficient for lithium ions in
Nafion-117 membranes calculated from NMR
data is almost equal to the diffusion coefficient
for lithium ions in an external solution [18].
The 35Cl NMR spectrum at room temperature
for the lithium form of the Nafion-117 membrane
also exhibits only one narrow line (Fig. 5b). It is
broader than that for the LiCl water solution
(Fig. 5c). The chloride-ion concentration in the
membrane equilibrated with 1 M LiCl solution
was estimated with the use of 35Cl NMR data. It
is equal to 0.12 mmol/cm3 and is almost 15 times
less than the concentration of cations in the
membrane. A comparison of concentrations obtained of chloride and lithium ions with their
diffusion coefficients shows that their mobility
values are close. Moreover, obtained Cl! concentration was two times less than that found by
Jones et al. [14] for a Nafion-117 equilibrated
with 1 M NaCl solution. The lower concentration
of chloride ions in the membrane equilibrated
with LiCl solution can be another reason for the
lower diffusion permeability value than in the
case of the sodium chloride solution.
3.4. Ion-exchange kinetics
Cation diffusion coefficients were also estimated on the basis of H+/M+ ion-exchange kinetics data. Diffusion coefficients were determined
using the equation proposed by Boyd and coworkers [19]. In the case when transfer occurs
through the plate, this equation is given as:
where F is the fractional attainment of equilibrium, t is time, and h is the thickness of the
membrane. The series in Eq. (13) converges
rather quickly for high exchange degrees.
The values obtained for diffusion coefficients
are given in Table 1. The diffusion processes in a
membrane proceed at a very high rate and are
close to the limit of this method. Therefore, a few
experimental data points related to the last stages
of ion exchange are applicable for calculation
(when a degree of proton substitution in a membrane is high enough). In general, in the case of
interdiffusion, diffusion coefficient values are
determined by the diffusion coefficient of less
mobile (in comparison with protons) alkali metal
cations. Nevertheless, they are noticeably above
the values determined from conductivity data.
Thus, the presence of protons leads to a rise in
alkali metal cation mobility. Some contribution to
cation mobility growth can be made by defect
formation processes, which intensively proceed in
a membrane after alkali addition [20].
4. Conclusions
Ion mobility and transport numbers in Nafion
membranes depend strongly on the nature and
composition of equilibrating solutions. Counterion and co-ion mobility in the membrane is
highly affected by the presence of other electrolytes. A comparison of the data obtained by
different techniques has given an estimate for
diffusion coefficients for different ions in Nafion117 membranes. Transport numbers of anions in
the salt forms of the Nafion-117 membrane
increase with the growth of radius of corresponding cations and with an increase in the
equilibrating electrolyte concentration.
Acknowledgements
References
[1] S.P. Nunes and K.-V. Peinemann, Membrane Technology in the Chemical Industry, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2001.
[2] K. Prater, J. Power Sources, 51 (1994) 129.
[3] V.I. Zabolotsky and V.V. Nikonenko, Perenos ionov
v membranah [Ion Transfer in Membranes], Nauka,
Moscow, 1996.
[4] G. Alberti and M. Casciola, Solid State Ionics, 145
(2001) 3.
[5] R.C. Slade, A. Hardwick and P.C. Dickens, Solid
State Ionics, 9/10 (1983) 1093.
[6] A. Narebska, S. Koter and W. Kujawsky, Desalination, 51 (1984) 3.
[7] A. Narebska, S. Koter and W. Kujawsky, J. Membr.
Sci., 25 (1985) 15.
[8] G. Pourcelly, A. Lindheimer and C. Gavach, J.
Electroanals. Chem., 305 (1991) 97.
[9] R. Lteif, L. Dammak, C. Larchet and B. Auclair, Eur.
Polymer J., 35 (1999) 1187.
[10] N.P. Berezina, S.V. Timofeev and N.A. Kononenko,
J. Membr. Sci., 209 (2002) 509.
57