Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
The effect of interfacial tension (IFT) on the displacement of the
nonwetting and wetting phases has been investigated by the use of
simulations/history matching of flooding experiments. In surfactant flooding, a conventional assumption is to neglect the effect of
capillary pressure (Pc) on measured two-phase properties. The
methodology applied in this paper allows improved interpretation
of experimental results by correcting for the influence of capillary
end effects on the measured capillary desaturation curve (CDC)
and on the estimated relative permeability (kr).
Three fluid systems of different IFTs were prepared by use of a
solvent system (CaCl2 brine/iso-octane/isopropanol) rather than a
surfactant system with the assumption that both systems have similar flood behavior at reduced IFT. Three coreflood cycles, including
multirate oil injection (drainage) followed by multirate water injection (imbibition), were carried out at each IFT in water-wet Berea
cores. The kr functions corrected for capillary end effects were
derived by numerically history matching the experimental production and pressure-drop (PD) history.
A typical CDC is observed for the nonwetting phase oil, with a
roughly constant plateau in residual oil saturation (ROS), Sor, below
a critical capillary number (Ncc) and a declining slope above Ncc toward zero Sor. No influence of Pc was found for the nonwettingphase CDC.
The results from the displacement of the wetting phase formed
an apparent CDC with a declining slope and no Ncc. Analyzing
the wetting-phase results, we find that the wetting-phase CDC is
not a true CDC. First, it is a plot of the average remaining water
saturation (Sw) in the core which, in all the experiments, is higher
than residual water saturation, Swr, obtained from Pc measurements. Second, we find that the remaining Sw is only partly a function of Nc. At low Nc, the water production (WP) is limited by
capillary end effects. Rate-dependent WP observed with the highIFT system is fully reproduced in simulations by use of constant
kr and Pc. The remaining wetting-phase saturation at a low capillary number (Nc) is a result of the core-scale balance between viscous and capillary forces and would, for example, depend on the
core length. At a higher Nc, the WP is found to be limited by the
low kr tail, typical for wetting phases. However, we find that the
kr functions become rate dependent at a higher Nc, and we assume
that this rate dependency can be modeled as a function of Nc. The
remaining wetting-phase saturation at a higher Nc would then be a
function of Nc and the number of pore volumes (PVs) injected.
The observed Nc dependency in the flow functions indicates a
potential for the accelerated production of the wetting phase by
use of surfactant.
Assuming that the results obtained here for the wetting phase
also apply to oil in a mixed-wet system, it is strongly recommended to evaluate the effect of both Pc and Ncc when designing
a surfactant model for a mixed-wet field.
This paper (SPE 143028) was accepted for presentation at the 73rd EAGE Conference and
Exhibition/SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 2326 May 2011, and revised for
publication. Original manuscript received for review 19 November 2012. Revised manuscript
received for review 11 November 2013. Paper peer approved 25 November 2013.
Introduction
After waterflooding of water-wet sandstone reservoirs, the residual nonwetting phase (oil) is trapped as discontinuous droplets.
On a core scale, viscous and capillary forces are the two main
forces acting on residual oil drops (Marle 1991). As a result, microscopic displacement efficiency depends on the relative influence of these two forces.
The mobilization of capillary-trapped oil depends on the ratio
of viscous to capillary forces that is defined as Nc. Several expressions have been used in literature to define Nc, and the following
expression was used in this study:
Nc
kDP
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
rL
Residual non-wetting or
wetting saturation, %
Normal range
waterfloods
Wetting phase
30
20
Non-wetting
phase
10
Non-wetting
critical Nc
Wetting
critical Nc
0 7
10
10
10
10
10
10
Capillary number Nc
Fig. 1CDCs (Lake 1989).
To separator
(drainage)
Piston cells
DP
Brine
10 bar
50 bar
oil
DW
Pump
To separator
(imbibition)
Fig. 2Experimental setup.
System
2 wt%
CaCl2 brine (vol%)
Iso-Octane
(vol%)
Isopropanol
(vol %)
Volume
Ratio (Vw/Vo)
row
(mN/m)
lW
(cp)
lO
(cp)
qW
(g/ml)
qO
(g/ml)
1
2
3
50
23
12
50
44
44
0
33
44
1:1
1:1
11:9
38.50
1.12
0.09
1.0
3.8
3.0
0.46
0.56
0.70
1.013
0.917
0.840
0.701
0.706
0.718
viscosimeter, respectively. Low IFT was measured with a spinning-drop interfacial tensiometer (Texas Model 500), whereas
higher IFT was measured with the Kruss K8 interfacial-ring
tensiometer.
same rate (Step 3b). The main reason for stepwise increasing the
flow rate is to increase the Nc. An increase in the Nc by an
increase in flow rate and a decrease IFT allows the measurement
of CDC in a broader range of Nc.
Simulation Methods
The effect of varying IFT and the correction of capillary end
effect on kr have been studied with the SENDRA simulator. SENDRA uses a fully implicit black-oil formulation that is based on
Darcys law and a continuity equation (SENDRA Simulator
2009) with an automated history-matching routine (estimation
mode) and a forward simulation of an experimental performance
(simulation mode).
The simulation was carried out on a block-centered grid,
describing drainage displacement under the following conditions.
A two-phase flooding experiment in a horizontal core orientation
30
30
3.77
3.77
23
25
675
866
76.89
83.30
1
2 and 3
Step
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
0.1
0.3
1.0
3.0
10.0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note: The a and b represent the drainage and imbibition process, respectively. X
indicates the injection rate(s) used.
39
(a)
(b)
90
Sys 1_Step 1a
80
Sys 1_Step 2a
70
Sys 1_Step 3a
Sys 2_Step 1a
Sys 2_Step 2a
60
Pc (kPa)
Pc (kPa)
100
50
40
30
Sys 2_Step 3a
20
10
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
Sw
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sw
(c)
0.4
Sys 3_Step 1a
Sys 3_Step 2a
Pc (kPa)
0.3
Sys 3_Step 3a
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sw
Fig. 3Capillary pressure curve for the systems (Steps 1 through 3): (a) System 1, (b) System 2, and (c) System 3. (a), System 1
(IFT 5 38.5 mN/m). (b), System 2 (IFT 5 1.12 mN/m). (c), System 3 (IFT 5 0.09 mN/m).
kro kroe
Swn
Swn LW
Swn LW Ew 1 Swn TW
1 Swn Lo
1 Swn Lo Eo Swn To
Sw Swr
1 Sor Swr
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
.
where Swn is the normalized water saturation; krwe and kroe represent the water and oil endpoint relative permeability, respectively;
and L, E, and T are empirical constants. The parameter L
describes the lower part of the curve, T describes the top part of
the curve, and E describes the elevation of the curves. The LET
correlation was applied in this work because it is more flexible
than the traditional Corey-type equation, yet it tends to produce
smooth kr curves with a satisfactory matching of the experimental
production and PD history.
A fixed Swr 0.1 was used in all simulations to capture fluidflow behavior at lower water saturation. Additional key input pa40
10
ml/min
60
80
70
30
30
DP, kPa
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
20
20
60
Exp:DP
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
50
40
15
10
30
20
20
10
10
25
70
WP, ml
DP, kPa
Exp:DP
40
ml/min
80
50
50
10
90
60
40
WP, ml
(a)
10
0
0
0
10
30
20
40
0
0
50
10
PV Injected
15
20
25
30
PV Injected
Step 3a (IFT = 38.5 mN/m)
10 ml/min
200
25
180
160
20
140
120
15
100
80
10
60
40
Exp:DP
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
20
WP, ml
DP, kPa
(c)
5
0
0
0
10
15
20
25
PV Injected
Fig. 4History match of WP and PD for System 1 (oil/water): (a) Step 1a, (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a (IFT 5 38.5 mN/m).
(b), Step 2a (IFT 5 38.5 mN/m). (c), Step 3a (IFT 5 38.5 mN/m).
40
70
60
35
60
50
30
40
20
Exp:DP
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
15
10
20
40
60
80
45
40
30
25
30
20
20
Exp:DP
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
20
15
10
10
10
5
0
30
ml/min
40
DP, kPa
25
10
35
50
WP, ml
DP, kPa
(b)
ml/min
WP, ml
0
100
PV injected
10
15
20
PV injected
Step 3a (IFT = 1.12 mN/m)
10 ml/min
(c)
120
45
40
DP, kPa
100
35
Exp:DP
Sim:DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
80
60
30
25
20
WP, ml
(a) 0.1+0.3+1.0
15
40
10
20
5
0
0
0
10
15
20
25
PV Injected
Fig. 5History match of WP and PD for System 2: (a) Step 1a, (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a (IFT 5 1.12 mN/m). (b), Step
2a (IFT 5 1.12 mN/m). (c), Step 3a (IFT 5 1.12 mN/m).
The kr Curves. The estimated kr curves from all the drainage displacements are shown in Fig. 7. One should keep in mind that the
experimental support for the curves is limited to the saturation
range in which there is two-phase production. Below remaining
Sw, the curves are an extrapolation of the experimental data,
whereas at a higher Sw, the curves are interpolations between the
endpoint values and the breakthrough saturations obtained by history matching production and PD for the drainage process. The
saturation regions with a high density of points in Fig. 7c illustrate
the region of experimental support for the computed curves. The
points represent an analytical computation of the kr with the
method described by Virnovsky (1984) (the method is similar to
the one described by Johnson et al. 1959). Such analytical methods are appropriate when there is no rate dependency and when
capillary end effects can be ignored, and we see that, for the single-high-rate floods in Step 3a, the analytical results are close to
the curves estimated with SENDRA.
The difference in the computed kr functions for the three systems observed in Fig. 7 and the difference in computed functions
between the three steps clearly indicate that the kr changes at
higher Nc, which is in line with the observations of rate dependency made from the production profiles in the preceding subsection. Although the multirate design is a good technique for an
experimental detection of rate dependency, the calculation of kr
from the experiment becomes more involved when the kr functions themselves are rate dependent. In the first drainage cycle
(Step 1a), the rate is varied by two orders of magnitude, from 0.1
to 10 cm3/min. For System 2, the two first rates are below the
assumed onset of rate dependency at Nc 105, whereas the
remaining rate steps are in the rate-dependent region. For System
3, all rate steps are in the rate-dependent region. Correct history
matching of these experiments would require a rate-dependent kr
model that is not available in SENDRA. The curves in Fig. 7a are
42
ml/min
50
45
40
60
35
30
25
40
30
Sim: DP
WP:Exp
DP, kPa
Exp:DP
0
0
10
12
14
ml/min
60
50
35
30
25
20
20
15
10
10
5
WP:Sim
10
5
10
50
45
40
50
20
15
40
Exp:DP
Sim: DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
20
10
0
16
30
WP, ml
10
0.3
WP, ml
DP, kPa
(a)
PV Injected
PV Injected
Step 3a (IFT = 0.09 mN/m)
10 ml/min
(c)
120
50
DP, kPa
40
35
30
25
Exp:DP
Sim: DP
Exp:WP
Sim:WP
80
60
20
40
WP, ml
45
100
15
10
5
0
20
0
0
PV Injected
Fig. 6History match of WP and PD for System 3: (a) Step 1a, (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a (IFT 5 0.09 mN/m). (b), Step
2a (IFT 5 0.09 mN/m). (c), Step 3a (IFT50.09 mN/m).
(b)
krw_sys 1
kro_sys 1
krw_sys 2
krw_sys 1
kro_sys 2
krw_sys 3
kro_sys 3
kro_sys 2
1.E+00
1.E+00
1.E01
1.E01
Kr
Kr
(a)
1.E02
1.E03
kro_sys 1
krw_sys 2
krw_sys 3
kro_sys 3
1.E02
1.E03
1.E04
1.E04
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Sw
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Sw
(c)
krw_sys 1
kro_sys 1
krw S1-an
kro S1-an
krw_sys 2
kro_sys 2
krw S2-an
kro S2-an
krw_sys 3
kro_sys 3
krw S3-an
kro S3-an
1.E+00
Kr
1.E01
1.E02
1.E03
1.E04
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Sw
Fig. 7Water/oil kr for Systems 1 through 3: (a) Step 1a (krw overlap for all the systems), (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a
(multirate primary drainage). (b), Step 2a (second drainage). (c) Step 3a (single-rate tertiary drainage). Lines represent SENDRA;
markers denote analytical solution.
(b)
1.0E+03
1.0E+03
1.0E+02
1.0E+02
1.0E+01
1.0E+01
krw/kro
krw/kro
(a)
1.0E+00
sys 1
1.0E01
sys 2
sys 3
1.0E02
1.0E+00
sys 1
1.0E01
sys 2
sys 3
1.0E02
1.0E03
1.0E03
1.0E04
1.0E04
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.4
Sw
0.6
0.8
Sw
Step 3a (tertiary drainage)
(c)
1.0E+03
1.0E+02
krw/kro
1.0E+01
1.0E+00
sys 1
1.0E01
sys 2
sys 3
1.0E02
1.0E03
1.0E04
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Sw
Fig. 8The kr ratio krw/kro in the three drainage cycles for Systems 1 through 3: (a) Step 1a, (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a
(primary drainage). (b), Step 2a (secondary drainage). (c), Step 3a (tertiary drainage).
(a)
(b)
0.9
EXP_sys 1
0.9
S1-2a exp.
0.8
ECLIPSE_sys 1
0.8
ECLIPSE_sys 1
EXP_sys 2
0.7
Remaining Sw
Remaining Sw
1.0
ECLIPSE_sys 2
0.6
EXP_sys 3
0.5
ECLIPSE_sys 3
0.4
0.3
ECLIPSE_sys 2
0.6
S3-2a exp.
0.5
ECLIPSE_sys 3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
S2-2a exp.
0.7
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
10
PV injected
15
20
25
30
PV injected
Step 3a (tertiary drainage)
(c)
Remaining Sw
1.0
0.9
S1-3a exp.
0.8
ECLIPSE_sys 1
S2-3a exp.
0.7
ECLIPSE_sys 2
0.6
S3-3a exp.
0.5
ECLIPSE_sys 3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
10
15
20
25
PV injected
Fig. 9Remaining Sw for Systems 1 through 3: (a) Step 1a, (b) Step 2a, and (c) Step 3a. (a), Step 1a (primary drainage). (b), Step 2a
(secondary drainage). (c), Step 3a (tertiary drainage).
February 2014 SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
45
(a)
non-wetting phase
0.6
SS
S1-1b
S2-1b
0.4
S3-1b
S1-2b
S2-2b
0.2
Remaining Sw
0.8
S3-2b
S1
S2
0.6
S3
0.4
0.2
S1-3b
0
1.E07
S2-3b
0
1.E07
S3-3b
1.E06
1.E05
1.E04
1.E03
1.E05
1.E04
1.E03
1.E02
Nc = kP/IFT
1.E02
Nc = kP/IFT
(b)
1.E06
wetting phase
0.8
S1-1a
S2-1a
Remaining Sw
0.6
S3-1a
S1-2a
0.4
S2-2a
S3-2a
S1-3a
0.2
S2-3a
S3-3a
0
1.E07
1.E06
1.E05
1.E04
1.E03
1.E02
Nc = kP/IFT
Fig. 10Measured CDC at water-wet condition for (a) nonwetting
phase and (b) wetting phase. The blue solid lines are drawn to
represent continuous CDC for the three systems: S1 5 System 1,
S2 5 System 2, and S3 5 System 3.
comparison. The results indicate that end effects dominate the experimental data at the lowest rate. If such a coreflood is used as a
reference in, for example, the evaluation of surfactant-flooding
potential, it is vital that the additional recovery resulting from the
removal of capillary end effects not be included as part of the surfactant potential. The reference case at high IFT should be carried
out with a sufficient suppression of the capillary end effects, or
alternatively, the end effects should be corrected for in the interpretation of the experiment.
Fig. 13 demonstrates estimated capillary end effects and possible experimental remaining-oil-saturation history predicted with
mixed saturation functions (kr and Pc) typical for North Sea fields.
The effect of the oil/water viscosity ratio is also demonstrated.
Increasing the viscosity ratio in a mixed-wet formation will significantly delay the oil production and increase the remaining So.
0.6
0.6
Remaining So
Water saturation, Sw
0.8
0.4
0.5
Visc ratio 10
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0
1.E08
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
SS
0.7
0.1 ml/min
0.3 ml/min
1 ml/min
3 ml/min
10 ml/min
1.E07
1.E06
1.E05
1.E04
1.E03
1.E02
Nc = kP/IFT
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank Wintershall Holding GmbH and the
Norwegian Research Council for supporting this work.
References
Abrams, A. 1975. The Influence of Fluid Viscosity, Interfacial Tension,
and Flow Velocity on Residual Oil Saturation Left by Waterflood.
SPE Journal 15 (5): 437447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5050-PA.
Al-Wahaibi, Y.M., Grattoni, C.A., and Muggeridge, A.H. 2006. Drainage
and Imbibitions Relative Permeabilities at Near Miscible Conditions.
February 2014 SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
48