Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We have heard alot about the 21st Century Learner. We know that they are:
Collaborative
Adaptive
Communicators
The Adaptor
The 21st Century teacher is an adaptor. Harnessed as we are to an assessment
focused education model the 21st Century Educator must be able to adapt the
curriculum and the requirements to teach to the curriculum in imaginative ways.
They must also be able to adapt software and hardware designed for a business
model into tools utilisable by a variety of age groups and abilities.
They must also be able to adapt to a dynamic teaching experience. When it all
goes wrong in the middle of a class, when the technologies fail, the show must
go on.
1.
2.
Hi Erin
I agree with your question what is being done to prepare the teachers of
tommorow? They have a huge job, as do the current teachers trying to adapt.
But what are the colleges of eduction doing to prepare teachers for teaching and
learning in a new mode?
Certainly the student teachers (pre-service teachers ) I have seen are not
particularly adept at the integration of these emerging technologies into the
classroom. Most can recognise a smartboard 9 times out of 10, but use this
tool.
thanks for your reply and for your very vaild question
A
3.
I think 21st Century teachers are 21st Century learners first. They learn right
along with and from their students.
4.
Excellent post! I think the 21st century teacher and the 21st century student
need to share the same qualities they are both the 21st century learner, right?
I wrotea post about this a while back and included both students and teachers in
the same understandings about 21st century literacy.
I also wonder about being content creators. Maybe thats included in one of your
categories above, though. I love Steve Hargadons idea of pro-sumers
5.
I agree they have to learn with the students. They must learn and adapt, and
take risks and let the students take the lead role.
I suspect that one key difference is that they (the 21st century
teacher/educator) must also have a clear vision of the goals, objectives and end
points he or she must reach.
I can not see the assessment regimes most education systems have reaching
out from their 18th century origin and making it to the 21st century in a hurry,
so teachers will still be constricted by the exam/assessment pressures no matter
what pedagogoical appraoch they undertake.
Thanks for the replies much appreciated
If you like Steve, you will probably enjoy wikinomics and the world is flat if you
havent already
A
6.
This is such a great insight. I train teachers about the digital native all of the
time. I would love to use this, and give you credit of course, as I talk with
teachers about their changing roles. Thanks for the post.
7.
I like what youve started here I realize youre coming at it from an ICT
integration perspective, but youve given me something to think about, even in
the general sense.
Also, Id like to get my hands on a reference (if you happen to have one) for the
6-item list you give for the 21st century learner. Id like to read more on this.
8.
Hi Nicole,
I dont have any references as I have written this one myself. I am coming for an
integration perspective as this is one of my areas of interest and responcibility.
There is much written about the 21st century learner but very little written
about the 21st century teacher who is meant to facilitate and enable all of this
learning.
I have seen with my own students that theya re very capable of learning and
operating the tools, but they often lack the insight (not suprisingly) to apply
these tools and technologies to learning.
I agree with Sheryl and Kims comments about 21st century teachers are 21st
century learners first. But teaching is more than just being a learner, learning is
essential, its crucial, but teaching is so much more. We must have a wide
perspective, have huge tolerance and be able to adapt, manipulate, evaluate
and create. Its very Blooms
9.
So, just to keep the conversation going, would you say that a 21st Century
learner doesnt need to:
have a wide perspective, have huge tolerance and be able to adapt, manipulate,
evaluate and create?
I would say that they do and I would say that I expect learners to be reaching
all levels of Blooms taxonomy as well.
I wonder if thinking of our teachers as learners too will enable us to better meet
their needs (as tech facilitators/coordinators)? I wonder if teachers thinking of
themselves as learners is a very 21st century perspective? I wonder if we all
think of ourselves as learners would enable us to have a wide perspective, have
huge tolerance and be able to adapt, manipulate, evaluate and create?
10.
I think that the teaching profession still has a shortage of 21st Century Teachers
as you describe them so such a teacher must also be a leader! We Model for
teachers as well as students!
They must also be Reflective although I would put that characteristic within The
Adaptor and The Learnerrather than creating a new category. Self assessment is
key. Questioning of practice is essential.
Essentially, Im not really adding anything new, just expanding on the thoughtful
ideas you have come up with great post!
11.
12.
Having taught in a BEd program here, I had the chance to see a full range of
arising science teachers from tech gurus to cyberphobes. It was a huge learning
process for me because I had assumed that by default a science teacher in their
final term would by now already be adaptable and certainly at least aware of the
possibilities that technology could give them in their teaching. It seemed like a
no brainer to me.
Perhaps (I say perhaps because I am conflicted) perhaps I learned from my
students (who were now preservice teachers) that a great teacher in the 21st
century may not necessarily have to leverage 21st century tools, but he or she
still needs these other characteristics (i.e. adaptive, collaborative, visionary,
etc.), albeit in a different way.
So I agree that we need leaders but leaders in all creative aspects of great
teaching.
One final thought. Where would you fit patience, resilience, and acceptance into
your model? With all of the non-academic, social issues that teachers face,
sometimes these come to the forefront. Is the 21st Century teacher everything
to everyone? Do we (society) expect them to be?
13.
15.
This is a great post with so much to share with my colleagues. To speak directly
to Nicoles question. Is the 21st century teacher everything to everyone? I have
personally felt that academics for a long time has assessed learning from a very
narrow standpoint. As we all know there are many different styles of learner.
Therefore we need to be broader in our assessments we really do need to be in
a world where we are nurturing and teaching to everyone in everything. It would
not make a great director of a fortune 500 company if all they could do was form
perfectly correct essays, record and formulate great mathematical problems
however, they couldnt speak in front of a crowd or quickly make a decision and
then see it is delegated and collaborated. Lets open the box and learn,teach and
be taught through our students. By using the tools of technology and relying on
our students it cant be that hard can it?
16.
This post is a very helpful framework for thinking about a model for 21st century
teachers.
And I agreeI wonder what schools of education (in general) are doing to support
new teachers in this sort of model. But I think its also important as new
teachers enter our own buildings, that we provide enough scaffolding and
modeling for them that they feel supported in this kind of role. We tend to resort
to the way we were taught when hurried or unprepared, and new teachers
have a lot on their plates, generally.
Kim, loved your questions
I wonder if thinking of our teachers as learners too will enable us to better meet
their needs (as tech facilitators/coordinators)? and this one I wonder if we all
think of ourselves as learners would enable us to have a wide perspective, have
huge tolerance and be able to adapt, manipulate, evaluate and create?
I think tolerance and flexibility are such important qualities for us to have. And I
do think leadership on a campus has a great role in creating a safe, creative
environment where teachers feel very supported in taking risks, and being
flexible.
I also have been exploring this idea of cocreating curriculum WITH our students
instead of planning the curriculum and then covering it. I think an approach that
17.
Hi Carolyn,
Tolerance and Flexibility are hugely important for the 21st Century Educator, in a
world that is so rapidly changing and evolving, with knowledge growing
exponentially they are vital.
It is interesting that we are identifying these as key for 21st Century learners,
but they are no less valid or important for the 20th century teacher too. One
only has to think of our own students, to realise how flexible we have to be to
handle with care and consideration the teenage angst.
I like the partnership with our students, that sits well with me, but as teachers as
the director or conductor of the learning band we have to have the outcomes
and goals in mind.
Passionate learners a day where you dont learn something is a day wasted.
Nice reply thanks for that
Andrew
18.
19.
20.
21.
Every teacher should be like the teacher of mine. a very patient woman.
22.
Pingback: Norton Public Schools - The Future : What does a 21st Century
23.
24.
I concur with Sheryl. Every honest educator knows that the advent of electronic
education, and what used to be called the science of information retrieval, has
expanded/exploded at warp speed. If traditional digital immigrants like myself
are going to remain valid and relevant as educators of digital natives, we must
quickly re-enter the learning environment and adjust to the way they have
accidentally trained themselves to learn. The task is modifying the methodology
to be palatable and engaging to the digital native student.