Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00216-006-0374-9
Introduction
LIBS is a minimally destructive, real-time analytical
technique that has the potential to be an important tool
for geochemical analysis both in the laboratory and in the
field. Broadband LIBS captures the full emission spectrum
from 200 to 980 nm with a single laser shot, providing a
complete spectral analysis for a material. One particular
area where LIBS has an intrinsic advantage over other
analytical techniques, such as electron microprobe analysis
or x-ray fluorescence spectrometry, is for spatially-resolved
or in-field geochemical analysis of elements of low atomic
weight (i.e., Li, Be and B). In addition to providing a means
to perform real-time qualitative to quantitative chemical
analysis of geological materials [16], LIBS exhibits
potential as a tool for mineralogical/petrological analysis
[7, 8]. Based on the idea that every material produces a
unique emission spectrum, broadband LIBS analysis has
been applied to material identification and used to
distinguish between materials with similar elemental
signatures using full-spectrum statistical analysis [9, 10].
This paper presents the development of analytical
protocols that support a larger investigation of the
provenance of gem-quality beryl using a minimally
destructive chemical analysis tool. The data set consists
of 20 LIBS analyses for each of 96 beryl specimens of six
different colors from 16 countries, the Antarctic, and ten
different US states (Table 1). This variety of location and
color, which in beryl is generally attributed to chemical
composition, indicates that the database has captured much
of the natural compositional variation in beryl. Initial work
suggested that broadband LIBS could be used to
discriminate between different beryl samples of closely
similar composition. Prior to attempting to relate beryl
composition to location, however, we noted that the data
set has an unusually high variation of backgroundcorrected, internally-normalized peak intensities. We dis-
264
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
2
1
1
8
5
1
1
2
1
2
9
1
3
2
3
2
6
1
6
a
Includes red beryl (bixbite, Utah) and pezzottaite (Madagascar)
The common nomenclature for beryls with different colors is:
colorless=goshenite, blue/blue-green=aquamarine, pale-violet/
pink=morganite, light yellow/gold=heliodor, green=emerald, and
deep red-purple=pezzottaite
Fig. 1ab Molecular structure of beryl, Be3Al2Si6O18. a Structure projected onto (0001), looking down the c axis [11]. b Crosssections of the beryl structure across a ring of silica tetrahedra
[14, 15]
265
Analytical methodology
266
Element
Wavelength
Spectrometer
Element
Wavelength
Spectrometer
Ag
Ag
Al
Al
Au
Au
B
Ba
Ba
Be
Be
Be
Ca
Ca
Ca
Cl
Co
Cr
Cr
Cs
Cs
Cu
Cu
F
Fe
Fe
Ga
Ge
K
241.31
328.07
394.36
396.15
226.36
282.23
249.77
455.4
553.55
313.03
234.82
527.08
393.37
422.67
643.9
542.32
350.23
360.53
428.97
460.38
894.56
213.6
324.75
385.1
239.56
373.71
645.59
283.18
766.49
1
2
3
3
1
1
1
3
4
2
1
4
3
3
5
4
2
2
3
3
7
1
2
2
1
2
5
1
6
K
Li
Li
Mg
Mg
Mg
Mn
Mn
Na
O
O
P
P
Pb
Pt
Rb
Rb
Sc
Si
Si
Si
Sn
Sr
Sr
Ti
Ti
V
Y
Zn
Zn
769.9
610.36
670.79
279.55
280.27
285.21
257.61
259.37
309.27
777.54
844.81
214.91
255.32
405.78
340.81
780.02
794.76
361.38
288.16
251.61
634.7
284
407.77
460.73
334.94
336.12
437.9
377.44
213.87
334.5
6
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
7
1
1
3
2
6
6
2
1
1
5
1
3
3
2
2
3
2
1
2
267
Method II
Average
RSD,
included
Average
RSD,
gemmy
Average
RSD,
included
4.9%
4.1%
42.0%
53.9%
17.2%
25.2%
31.9%
43.1%
6.5%
7.5%
32.8%
46.0%
65.8%
56.6%
71.7%
63.2%
46.7%
59.7%
49.5%
64.6%
69.2%
73.7%
68.6%
81.6%
48.5%
62.1%
64.9%
67.3%
50.9%
63.4%
65.4%
65.7%
65.0%
57.3%
73.1%
64.7%
66.2%
44.2%
78.4%
55.3%
47.0%
47.4%
56.8%
56.8%
32.2%
42.7%
41.2%
60.1%
28.5%
39.4%
40.6%
54.4%
22.2%
29.9%
29.1%
36.4%
43.2%
58.9%
50.1%
61.4%
67.5%
75.7%
73.5%
82.2%
43.2%
46.8%
51.8%
52.1%
268
Table 4 Average RSDs for analyses of multiple beryl crystals with different surface textures
(nm)
Method I
Method II
Average RSD,
irregular
Average RSD,
irregular
3.5%
4.3%
4.0%
52.1%
46.2%
48.8%
14.5%
17.1%
23.1%
38.0%
30.7%
39.6%
6.6%
6.9%
6.6%
38.7%
31.4%
42.6%
53.3%
53.5%
55.2%
73.5%
68.2%
57.8%
36.3%
37.8%
60.0%
53.8%
42.9%
62.1%
68.3%
55.5%
72.0%
73.9%
63.2%
75.6%
51.1%
46.3%
50.2%
50.2%
61.9%
63.7%
53.7%
72.1%
58.1%
37.5%
59.4%
60.6%
64.4%
40.6%
71.5%
66.3%
69.7%
10.2%
66.6%
53.7%
83.1%
56.4%
71.0%
47.9%
52.1%
31.9%
45.7%
76.1%
40.8%
53.6%
17.9%
25.8%
41.6%
55.7%
47.6%
50.9%
24.0%
25.7%
36.6%
43.4%
38.6%
49.2%
14.2%
21.8%
28.5%
27.3%
32.8%
33.6%
39.0%
42.3%
50.2%
57.7%
51.3%
52.8%
66.5%
58.7%
78.5%
76.9%
71.5%
84.0%
36.5%
35.4%
51.1%
43.5%
44.1%
56.1%
Flat and smooth describes a perfect face on a gem-quality crystal. Flat and rough describes an imperfect crystal face. Irregular
describes a broken surface. Peak intensities normalized by Method I and Method II
269
Inclusions in beryl
created. Although care was taken to focus exactly on the
mineral surface, small differences in the position of the
spark relative to the sample surface probably caused shotto-shot variations in emission line intensity. The negative
correlations for the O and Be peak intensities (Fig. 7) can
be explained by the incorporation of different proportions
of beryl and air as a function of spark height. When the
spark is created slightly above the sample surface, the
analyzed volume should contain more air and less beryl,
resulting in higher O and lower Be intensities.
The applicability of Method I relies on constant
concentrations of Be, Al, Si, and O in all spectra from a
single specimen. If the mineral is chemically zoned
(variations in elemental composition occur on a very fine
spatial scale), the concentrations of the major elements will
vary from spectrum to spectrum. This phenomenon was
evaluated by examining the background-corrected peak
intensities from multiple analyses of the same sample.
Because Li selectively substitutes for Be, one would expect
a negative correlation between these elements, especially in
the Li-rich samples. This relationship is seen in these
samples (Fig. 8), suggesting that mineral zoning is a
contributing factor to the high shot-to-variability observed
in this study.
270
References
1. Grant KJ, Paul GL, ONeill JA (1991) Appl Spectrosc
4:701705
2. Wisbrun R, Schechter I, Niessner R, Schrder H, Kompa K
(1994) Anal Chem 66:29642975
271
3. Bolger JA (2000) Appl Spectrosc 54:181189
4. Rosenwasser S, Asimellis G, Bromley B, Hazlett R, Martin J,
Pearce T, Zigler A (2001) Spectrochim Acta B 56:707714
5. Hilbk-Kortenbruck F, Noll R, Wintjens P, Falk H, Becker C
(2001) Spectrochim Acta 56:933945
6. Capitelli FG, Colao F, Provenzano MR, Fantoni R, Brunetti G,
Senesi N (2002) Geoderma 106:4562
7. Fabre C, Boiron, M-C, Dubessy J, Chabiron A, Charov B,
Crespo TM (2004) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:14011407
8. Harmon RS, De Lucia FC, Miziolek AW, McNesby KL,
Walters RA, French PD (2005) Geochem Explor Environ Anal
5:2128
9. Gornushkin IB, Smith BW, Nasajpour N, Winefordner JD
(1999) Anal Chem 71:51575164
10. Anzano JM, Gornushkin IB, Smith BW, Winefordner JD
(2000) Polym Eng Sci 40:24232429
11. Klein C (2002) Mineral science (after James D. Dana). Wiley,
New York