Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Health,
1981,
ENERGY
19, 145.
EXPENDITURE
IN MANUAL
A. Samanta
Physiological
& Industrial
LOAD
CARRIAGE
Secn.,
110,
Calcutta-700
All
India
Chittaranjan
073,
Institute
of
Avenue,
INDIA.
manual
From observations
carriage
of self selected
of compact
speeds,
on subjects
range
Gross Load
on load carriage
loads of a given
(Body
were found
of the tasks
Gross
plus
weight
to be the principal
solely
for
over a range
of external
influences
performance.
Based on the data collected
the strenuousness
of load carriage tasks
Gross loads
weight
engaged
of weights,
load)
in determining
changes
during
their
so that
they
unduly fatiguing
in them.
Load
carriage-Energy
expenditure-Pulmonary
ventilation-Heart
rate
load-Speed
INTRODUCTION
population
whole-time basis.
The
physiological
investigated
costs associated
in this country
and abroad1-3).
by a worker have
Studies concerning
been carried
also reported
physiological
out
et al4); Malhotra and Sengupta5); Das and Saha6); Hughes and Goldman7),
Datta et al8) etc. Datta et al9); Datta and Ramanathan10) and Ramanathan
have
proportion
loads manually on a
studies on different
costs.
modes of load
carrying
and
and Datta11)
their
relative
performed in the laboratory, the number of subjects used were small and the natures of
work administered were generally standardized to suit laboratory conditions.
It was
thus
felt that
activity
there
was a need
under actual
working
for further
conditions
studying
in order
this widespread
that
the contributions
occupational
of various
factors encountered
and
transporting
loads on a permanent
basis.
145
A. SAMANTA
AND
METHODS
Description
B.B. CHATTERJEE
AND MATERIALS
to carry compact packages weighing between 24.6 Kg and 48.9 Kg on their heads from
a loading
platform
to the waiting
The
subjects
trucks
self-selected
ranged
between
platform to the truck varied from 16.78 to 53.96 meters on different occasions.
It was
also observed that, during actual load carriage, the workers walked with their loads
often at a fast rate along a relatively narrow strip of the courtyard and the interposition
of experimenters
to be made.
simulate as closely as possible the load carrying tasks within a warehouse where a clear
wide passage 40 meters in length was available for this purpose.
Selection of Subjects
Twenty
three young workers were selected from the group engaged whole time in
Naturally,
age, good
physique and nutrition as also apparent physical fitness were thh criteria with which
the selection was made. The principal criterion was of course, the workers' willingness
to volunteer as a subject in the study, the nature of which was explained to them.
The physical characteristics
The
principal
physical
of the subjects :
characteristics
of the subjects
It is apparent
physical
that
measurements
the average
healthy
Experimental
the group
and
labouring
age.
was
remarkably
homogeneous
small
weights
The
populations
body
of younger
ages
with
respect
and heights
from
Eastern
to
their
are typical
of
India.
Procedure
on the selected
subjects
observations
while they
simulated
it was
decided to make
at four
defferent weights of loads, viz., 0, 26, 35 and 44 Kg within the range of weights carried
by them.
These loads were made up of the various packages actually carried and were
any
the return
journeys
after
loading
being
ENERGY
the
16
(4 ~ 4)
manner.
to
helper
on
one
as
meters
was
asked
any
load
loads
load
was
was
subject
of
repeated
Physiological
The
and
in
by
air
detailed
in
in
referred
to
was
rate
gas
was
the
the
point,
or
without
To
help
pace
adjusting
meter
he
point
starting
keep
a
40
when
starting
minutes.
hand
by
forward
with
to
the
with
the
own
rate
his
intervals.
DB,
carried
the
the
the
course
the
of
by
Weir's
with
the
This
will
uptake
of
et
al14).
of
the
showed
after
each
The
thermal
average
57.1}7.32%.
hours
the
work.
experiments
two
load
of
procedures
Martiz
humidity,
than
action
the
an
watch,
oxygen
relative
more
dynamic
the
Measurements
of
and
forenoon,
specific
stop
by
season.
by
to
computed
of
described
winter
add
standard
Maximum
procedure
the
with
collecting
held
aliquotes
to
cessation
rate.
not
analysing
was
beats
after
uptake,
by
was
did
by
10
21.3}3.04
in
of
the
during
WB,
conducted
influence
timing
heart
during
prevailing
were
avoid
to
out
26.4}3.74
eqperiments
peak
weight
expenditure
immediately
the
its
determined
according
energy
by
according
all
that
oxygen
accessories
determined
the
load,
its
apparatus
and
ventilation,
was
with
so
was
analysis
as
condition
of
to
in
ventilation
subject,
measured
with
determined
were
the
al12)
subsequently
environmental
order
10
pulmonary
bag
uptake
et
still
experiments
the
of
at
the
walking
asked
watch
included
Douglas
behind
oxygen
Haldane
Heart
standing
values
period
placed
Pulmonary
The
step
The
in
rate.
bag.
Consolazio
method13).
subject
reach
to
head
speed,
back
of
assigned
asked
his
walk
given
and
random
be
then
to
to
the
reached
was
stop
floor
studied
heart
Douglas
him.
expired
subject
the
a
he
with
on
parameters
walking
carried
side
marks
he
for
walking,
asked
at
sequence
was
lifted
less
to
Measurements
air
assistant
the
then
and
or
load
He
then
around
As
and
of
his
of
speed.
a more
the
protocol.
was
turn
in
and
was
load
to
working
speed
the
load
given
and
head
normal
by
help
expenditure
expired
be
the
physiological
energy
in
in
CARRIAGE
days
speed
worker
the
same
his
desired
walked
with
The
shelf
the
on
as
the
who
walking
at
different
assigned
with
LOAD
The
up
the
suitable
placed
maintain
experimenter
walking
again
looked
and
passage
on
on
follows.
operation.
the
unload
subject
as
were
passage
actual
of
IN MANUAL
given
was
day
the
end
to
without
given
of
the
the
procedure
end
during
to
to
actual
subject
to
the
experiments
The
walk
EXPENDITURE
All
breakfast
in
food.
RESULTS
Table-1
like
ments
at
increments
nary
provides
pulmonary
each
of
of
sponding
spectively.
the
in the external
ventilation,
values
details
of observations
ventilation,
energy
energy
energy
16
load-speed
load-speed
Similarly
expenditure
was
combinations
the observed
the
principal
It
peak
average
during
found
that
rate.
parameters
the experias expected,
increased
The
the
observed
1.11 ms-1
values
was
rate,
of carriage
heart
11.92 KJ min-1
of 0 Kg and
physiological
combinations.
load carried
expenditure
on
expenditure
of peak
and
44 kg
and
pulmo-
range
of
the corre-
1.94 ms-1
re-
heart.
147
Table
A. SAMANTA
AND
Physiological
observations
1.
loads
at different
B.B. CHATTERJEE
during
carriage
of different
speeds
DISCUSSION
Heaviness
The
by
physiological
The
the
stated
above.
also
need
be
figure
shows
within
'
the
The
category.
these
that
acceptable
(KJ
are
carrying
26
light
loads
in
at
carrying
heavy
upto
35
cost,
Kg,
of
'
kg
to
at
as
these
35
in
Fig.
at
1.67
speeds
proposed
and
higher
heavy
',eand every
within
prolonged
'
1.39
Kg
broken
body
speeds
for
44
The
workers'
upto
fall
Kg
heavy
the
ms-1
very
scale
1.
heavy
for
loads
speed
the
workers.
26
adjusted
carrying
a
the
moderately
but
that
Kg
with
of
presented
',e
physiologically
physiological
compared
graphically
(loc.sit.),
indicates
above
was
weights
min-1)
of
criteria
figure
tasks
body
been
boundaries
loads
as
the
respective
have
Christensen
carrying
avoided,
also
performed
148
the
(ms-1)
indicate
to
carrying
the
expenditures
speeds
' according
of
to
energy
four
lines
heavy
heavy
adjusted
average
at
horizontal
and
strain
Christensen15)
loads
as
of the tasks
weights
(1.94
ms-1)
periods
operations.
ms-1
the
This
could
moderately
be
ENERGY
Fig.
1.
Energy
Relationship
transported
the
IN MANUAL
of load carriers
gross
load (weight
LOAD
in carrying
of load
loads
CARRIAGE
at different
carried
speeds.
plus body
weight)
expenditure
between
The four
expenditure
EXPENDITURE
and
the gross
correlation
coefficients
(r) have
squares.
The
degree
relationships
between
The
corresponding
energy
at the four
regression
the
were highly
significant
(P<0.001)
the gross load (Kg) are seen to be quite high at all speeds of carriage and were in the
range of +0.71 to +0.83, indicating that energy expenditures
were linearly
related
to
was also
derived which may enable the energy expenditure (KJ min-1) to be calculated when the
gross load transported was in the range of 47 to 92 Kg at different speeds ranging
between 1.11 and 1.94 ms-1. The method adopted for arriving at the above equation
149
A. SAMANTA
Fig.
2.
Regression
of energy
at various
speeds
energy
recourse
expenditure
expenditures
to by Bobbert16).
Variation
transported
The
with
was assumed to be in
of the a-coefficients
a= 2.67 S + 0.259
lbU
loads
Fig. 2(a) .
on the gross
of carriage.
speeds
in the equation
of carriage.
ENERGY
EXPENDITURE
Fig. 2 (b) .
IN
Variation
MANUAL
of the
b-coefficient
b = 0.184 S - 0.0334
presented
in Fig.
a and b were
and
separately
2B respectively.
related
tions
2 that
then
In
plotted
both
their
the
the speeds
diagrams,
the
manner
CARRIAGE
in the equation
speeds
a and b varied
in a linear
relationships
with
against
these
LOAD
of carriage.
with
speed.
of carriage
coefficients
and the
The
as shown
were
following
values
of
in Fig-2A
observed
to be
regression
equa-
these
values
As a further check
in
the
general
eqations
speeds employed,
from the
above equation.
E=a+bL
above,
it
was
found
calculated
that
loads and
of manual
load carriage
in this field tend to agree
that
sustained
physical
exertion
be considered
For a
therefore
over
several hours15,17-19). That this assumption is also equally applicable to Indian workers
was demonstrated
by Chakraborty
oxygen
uptake
of the workers
the
was
A. SAMANTA
carriers, the carriage of loads upto 35 Kg at speed upto 1.39 ms-1 and a load of 44 Kg
upto a speed of 1.11 ms-1 were associated with energy expenditures
above level.
The
rest
expenditure
observed
of the load-speed
reached
combinations
upto 87 % of the
exceeded
workers'
average
it and the
energy
maximum
oxygen
It may also
be seen from Fig. 2 that a horizontal line through 21.24 KJ min-1 (50 % of maximum
oxygen uptake) intersects the four straight lines, in order from the lowest one, at points
corresponding
average
Taking
the
body weight of the subjects as 47.3 Kg, they should be able to carry loads of
53.5 Kg, 33.9 Kg and 13.2 Kg at speeds of 1.11 ms-1, 1.39 ms-1 and 1.67 ms-1 respectively,
for prolonged periods without cumulative fatigue and that no loads may be transported
at a speed of 1.94 ms-1 except for brief
periods.
loads
were similarly calculated individually for each of the load carriers (on the basis of 50 %
of their respective maximum oxygen uptakes) and plotted as in Fig. 3 against
speeds of carriage in ms-1,a
linear relationship
various
of carriage were observed to exist. A regression line was constructed through the points
by the method of least squares. The degree of correlation (r) of the permissible external
loads and the speeds of carriage
Fig.
3.
Calculated
weights
was-0.93 which
of loads
was found
to be carried
with
to be highly
energy
expentiture
significant
ENERGY
EXPENDITURE
IN MANUAL
LOAD
CARRIAGE
(P<0.001).
The values of the permissible loads obtained in this manner were quite
close to those obtained from the earlier approach described. Fig. 3 could thus be utilized
for structuring
in manual
load carriage
on a permanent
programme
basis.
for workers
employed
carried, the speed of carriage may be suitably adjusted with reference to this figure by
extrapolating
the straight line towards the upper left hand corner as represented by the
Since
occupations,
supervision of occupational
in industrial and
in the
in the
of labour
at least,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to the Director, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public
Health, for providing the facilities for carrying out this work.
to Messers A. Chatterjee
experiments
in conducting the
1) Goldman,
R.F. (1965).
2) Goldman,
Ergonomics,
8, 321.
4) Malhotra,
M.S., Ramaswamy,
5) Malhotra,
J. (1965).
Indian
Ergonomics,
11,
8, 55.
J. Appl. Physiol.,
38, 132.
Indian
J. Occup. Health,
233.
Metabolic
Johnson,
Functions
in Man
L.J.
p. 60, McGraw-Hill
(1963).
Book Co.,
Physiological
Inc.,
Measurements
of
New York.
J. Physiol, 109, 1.
16, 507.
17, 675.
Ergonomics,
J. Appl. Physiol.,
C.H. (1961).
Ergono-
4, 97
15) Christensen,
E.H. (1963).
Man at Work,
Studies
country.
17) Astrand,
P.O. (1959).
and Chevalier,
R.B. (1961).
application
Occupational
on the
Arch. Environ.
of physiology
Health.,
to the
Series No. 4
2, 327.
153
A. SAMANTA
19) Wyndham,
C.H., Strydom,
N.B., Williams,
195,
1210.
20) Chakraborty,
Proc.
p. 107.
Sym.
Adaptability
to Environment
Physical
Fitness,
Ed.
Malhotra,
M.S.,