Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 October 2010
Accepted 10 October 2011
Available online 16 November 2011
Keywords:
Castellated beams
Cross-section class
Buckling
Imperfection
Tee-section
Web-post
Ultimate load
ENV1993-1-1 Annex N
a b s t r a c t
A numerical model is developed to predict the behavior of castellated beams with hexagonal and octagonal
openings up to failure. The numerical model takes into account both material and geometric nonlinearities. To
initiate buckling, an initial small out-of-plane geometric imperfection, obtained from an eigenvalues buckling
analysis, was imposed to the model. Results of experimental data obtained from previous works have shown
that the model is able to predict, with good accuracy, the ultimate load and to some extent the mode of failure.
A parametric study is then realized to assess the cross-section classication given in the Annex N and to compare
between the ultimate load behavior of castellated beams with hexagonal and octagonal openings when
subjected to exure and shear force. The numerical results have been compared with those obtained with
the design method presented in ENV1993-1-1 Annex N.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In steel structures, beams with opening in the web are widely used
to pass the underoor services ducts (water and sewage pipes, air
ducts, cables etc.). Castellated beams are varieties of girders with generally circular or hexagonal web openings, distributed along the beams
with regular intervals. The process of manufacturing castellated
beams, by cutting the web in zigzag pattern along its centerline and
then rejoining the two halves by welding, leads into an increase in
bending capacity and a reduction of the weight of the beam allowing
this type of beams to be used for medium to long spans constructions.
It is also possible to weld square or rectangular plates between the cut
halves, giving an even deeper castellated beam, producing octagonal
holes in its body. However, the presence of opening in the web affects
signicantly the shear and buckling resistance of the beam. As a result,
failure may occur in different or similar fashion than those observed in
solid beams. The experimental studies outlined in reference [1] have
identied six potential failure modes. These failure modes depend on
the special geometry of castellated beams, web slenderness, geometry
and size of openings, type of loading, and lateral supports provision.
Pure bending, shear and overall lateral torsional-buckling are
similar to the corresponding modes for solid-web beams and can
be treated in an almost identical manner, if the relevant geometric
properties used are based on the reduced cross-section.
102
32t w
lo
36t w
lo
l0 =
a 0 + b0
2
l0 =
a 0 + b 0 eff
2
Fig. 2. Geometric properties of castellated beam with hexagonal openings and denition of the length lo.
103
draft format but was never completed [7]. In this section, a literature
review of the design methods relative to local failures is summarized.
Critical section
a) Octagonal openings
Lateral bracing
u(x) = 0
Simply supported
Load
Lateral bracing
u(x) = 0
Symmetry boundary
condition w(z) = 0
b) Hexagonal openings
Load
104
moment ratio Msd/Mord and the shear force ratio Vsd/Vord at the
center of the opening were proposed [811].
moment and high local shear and axial forces should be considered. The total resistance to the local Vierendeel bending Mvrd,
equal to the sum of the Vierendeel resistances of the top and bottom tee-sections, should satisfy:
Mvrd > V sd leff
Msd
Mord
Vord
where
is the global shear force which must be transferred through
the opening i
is the effective length of the opening; leff = e for hexagonal
openings.
Vsd
leff
where
Table 1
Geometric and material properties of the tested castellated beams.
Specimens
a
101
102a
103a
104a
121a
122a
123a
124a
105b
106b
107b
a
b
dg (mm)
bf (mm)
tw (mm)
tf (mm)
e (mm)
h0 (mm)
b (mm)
hp (mm)
L (mm)
fyw (MPa)
fyf (MPa)
370.59
417.83
376.43
425.45
476.25
527.81
449.58
501.65
380.50
380.50
380.50
69.09
69.85
70.61
70.61
78.49
77.98
78.23
77.98
66.90
66.90
66.90
3.58
3.61
3.61
3.68
4.69
4.59
4.62
4.69
3.56
3.56
3.56
4.39
3.98
4.45
4.27
5.33
5.36
5.35
5.33
4.59
4.59
4.59
58.17
57.66
57.91
58.93
73.41
74.42
71.37
68.33
77.80
77.80
77.80
245.87
295.15
260.53
308.10
352.81
403.86
302.51
349.75
266.20
266.20
266.20
69.85
69.85
127
127
101.6
101.6
149.35
149.35
76.2
76.2
76.2
0
50.80
0
50.80
0
50.80
0
50.80
0
0
0
12
12
8
8
8
8
6
6
4
6
8
3048
3048
3048
3048
3048
3048
3048
3048
1220
1828
2438
357.10
357.10
357.10
357.10
311.60
311.60
311.60
311.60
352.90
352.90
352.90
342
342
342
342
307
307
307
307
345.60
345.60
345.60
PTEST/
PFEM
Reduction in
failure load (%)
101
79.1
103
73.84
121
114.66
123
116.44
105 (a) 92.7
105 (b) 100.9
106
94.8
107
84.4
Mean
Standard
deviation
73.87
83.33
123.9
111.70
101
101
84.9
81.72
1.07
0.89
0.92
1.04
0.92
1.00
1.12
1.03
0.998
0.082
1.12
0.92
0.97
1.06
0.99
1.07
1.19
1.10
1.05
0.088
4.71
3.32
0.05
0.02
6.93
6.93
6.60
5.95
4.31
2.91
70.39
80.56
117.8
109.7
94
94
79.3
76.86
105
p2b2
Web-post with too short mid-depth welded joints may fail prematurely when horizontal shear stresses exceed the yield strength. To
avoid such failure, the following shear strength criterion, dened in
ENV 1993-1-1 Annex N [5], should be checked:
e t w f yw
V hi p
3
where
h0
tw
PTest
(kN)
PFEM
(kN)
PTest/
PFEM
101
2
102
3
103
1
104
2
121
1
122
1
123
1
124
1
105 (a) 1
105 (b) 1
106
1
107
1
Mean
Standard deviation
3
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
79.10
58.71
73.84
50.26
114.66
94.74
116.44
93.41
92.70
100.9
94.80
84.40
70.39
59.65
80.56
56.00
117.8
95.50
109.7
92.20
94.00
94.00
79.3
76.86
1.12
0.984
0.916
0.897
0.970
0.991
1.06
1.013
0.986
1.073
1.19
1.10
1.025
0.0866
106
This element takes into account the membrane and exural deformations and can simulate plastic and large displacement behaviors. Only
one layer of elements is used in the through thickness direction. Finer
meshes are generated to model areas near the openings, in order to
improve precision and to accommodate the opening shapes. The calculation model exploited symmetry of geometry and loading about
the center plane of the beam with only one-half of the beam modeled
in order to reduce the model size and subsequent processing time.
Although the cross-section was also symmetrical about its major and
minor axes, it was necessary to model the full cross-section because
the buckled shape is non-symmetrical. Regular meshing was
employed for all components of the beam. The density and the conguration of the nite element mesh were determined based on results
obtained from convergence studies in order to provide a reasonable
balance between accuracy and computational expense. The dimensions of elements with the minimum width, located around the opening, were chosen such that the aspect ratio was kept below 5. The
nonlinear analyses were performed with meshes varying from 1472
to 3776 elements. An overall view of typical nite element models,
of castellated beams with hexagonal and octagonal openings are
shown in Fig. 4.
To account for the large displacements, geometry nonlinearity is
considered. The geometrically nonlinear analysis followed the continually changing geometry of the beam when formulating each successive load increment. The kinematic description of the shell
elements in nonlinear geometrical analysis is based on small strain
107
108
local web buckling of the tee-section. This may explain the reason
why the difference between the FEM and the test ultimate load is
the highest among the considered beams. Therefore, it can be concluded that Web-post buckling may occur before local web buckling
of the tee-section classied as class 4.
6. Parametric studies
Having the condence of the model with experimental results, a
series of parametric studies were conducted on the tested beams
101, 102, 103, 104, 121, 122, 123 and 124. The aim of this
study is to examine the inuence of the class of the perforated
cross-section on the ultimate strength and the mode of failure of castellated beams under combined bending and shear. A comparison
study of castellated beams with hexagonal and octagonal openings
was carried-out as well. It is well known that the primary parameters
affecting the nonlinear behavior of castellated beams are the bending
moment to shear force ratio at the center line of the opening, the
slenderness of the web dw/tw, the depth of the opening to the depth
of the web ratio h0/dw, and the material properties (yield stress and
stressstrain relationship). These geometrical and material parameters govern also the classication of the tee cross-section above and
below the opening. The parameters, which are considered in this
study, include the web thickness, the material yield stress and the
depth of the opening. All other dimensions were kept similar to
those of the tested beams. The numerical analysis was performed for
109
Fig. 9. Variation of normalized load capacity with ratio of opening height to web height.
110
have the same geometries except for the presence or not of an intermediate plate. The second of each pair has an intermediate plate. In
order to facilitate the comparison between the behaviors of these
two types of castellated beams, the variation of the predicted ultimate
load with respect to a considered parameter was plotted for each pair
separately.
The examination of Figs. 79 show that the inuence of web thickness of developing a full plastic moment on castellated beams is the
dominant factor, while the inuence of the yielding stress and the
depth of the web to the height of the opening ratio appear to be of
secondary importance. Nevertheless, their effect should not be negligible. Figs. 7 and 8 show that the considered castellated beams, classied as class 2, do not reach their full plastic moment as dened by
Eurocode 3 [6]. This was expected because the critical sections are
subjected to combined bending and shear instead of pure bending.
Hence, the determination of the bending resistance at the center of
an opening should include the effect of shear force. This was not explicitly mentioned in clause N.3.4.2.2 of ENV1993-1-1 Annex N [5].
It can also be observed from Fig. 7 that the ratio PFEM/PY decreases
as the depth of the beams increases, which put into evidence once
again the inuence of shear force. The examination of Figs. 7 and
8 shows that the ratio PFEM/PY decreases as the web thickness decreases or as the yielding stress increases. Therefore, these results
agree with the conditions of Eurocode 3 Annex N, which denes the
cross-section classication of perforated cross-section of castellated
beams with hexagonal and octagonal openings.
Fig. 10 shows typical contour plots of the von Mises stresses at
failure for beam 121, classied as class 3, and two identical
beams of class 4 and 3 obtained by modifying the web thickness of
beam 121. This gure shows clearly that the spread of the plastic
zone grows as the class of the perforated cross-section is increased
which conrms the accuracy of the cross-section classication of
ENV1993-1-1 Annex N [5]. It can also be observed that the upper
and lower tee-sections of class 2 located in the vicinity of the midspan point load are almost fully yielded, which explains why the
values of the ratio PFEM/PY for beams of class 2 are in most cases
close to unity. This demonstrates that castellated beams classied
as class 2 will probably fail by yielding mechanism.
However, this agreement was not achieved for some beams classied as class 4 (see Fig. 9), where the ratio PFEM/PY increases as the
class of the perforated cross-section rises from class 3 to 4 or as it becomes closer to the upper limits of class 3 or 4. This may be explained
Fig. 10. Typical von Mises contour plots at failure for beams of various cross-section classes.
111
Fig. 11. von Mises contour plot at failure for beam 122 (cross-section class 3).
by the fact that in these cases, failure will probably occurs by local
buckling of the top tee-section, and that the proposed numerical
model cannot predict accurately the ultimate load. However, this conrms that the perforated cross-section for these beams are well of class
4 as classied by ENV1993-1-1 Annex N [5].
Figs. 79 show clearly that castellated beams with intermediate
plates have less capacity of developing a full plastic moment compared
to those without such plates classied as class 3 and 4. The difference
decreases signicantly for class 2 perforated cross-sections and the
112
113
thickness of beam 102 in which, their load capacities were lower than
those obtained from beams with identical geometrical properties but
without intermediate plates. Zaarour and Redwood [2] have reported
that the strength of castellated beams with intermediate plates decreases as the ratio of the intermediate plate height to the opening
height hp/h0 increases. They concluded that this reduction in strength
is probably due to web-post buckling. As can be seen from Table 1,
beam 102 has the highest hp/h0 ratio. A limited parametric study is
therefore carried out to study the inuence of the hp/h0 ratio on the
ultimate load of castellated beams with intermediate plates of class 2.
Four of the castellated beams classied as class 2 perforated crosssection considered previously were analyzed by varying the parameter
hp/h0 ratio from 0, for castellated beams without intermediate plates,
to 0.2. The results are illustrated in Fig. 13. It can be observed that in
overall the maximum ultimate load is obtained when the hp/h0 ratio
range between 0 and 0.15. However, little improvement could be
achieved when the hp/h0 ratio exceeds 0.2. The ultimate load could
be even lower compared to the beam without intermediate plates as
was obtained for beams 102 and 104. This drop in the ultimate
load seems to be more pronounced for shallower beams, as is beam
102 in this case.
7. Comparative analysis of the numerical results and the EC3
design specication
Following the parametric study, the numerical results obtained with
LUSAS software for shear strength have been compared with those
using Eurocode 3 Annex N [5] for castellated beams with hexagonal
and octagonal openings of class 2 and 3. The results are expressed in
non-dimensional form by plotting the design to the numerical shear
strength ratio (VEC3/VFEM) in terms of web thickness, yielding stress
and h0/dw ratio as shown respectively in Figs. 14, 15 and 16. The results
show that there is generally a reasonably good agreement between numerical and the ENV1993-1-1 Annex N [5] design method for castellated beams without intermediate plates and castellated beams with
intermediate plates classied as class 2. Even though, the yield patterns
obtained from the numerical analysis do not always agree with the
modes of failure obtained from the EC3 design method. The ratio
(VEC3/VFEM) varies from 0.82 to 1.11, and in overall, the Eurocode 3 results are mostly on the safe side when compared to the predicted nite
element results. While, for castellated beams classied as class 3 with
intermediate plates, a more signicant disparity between design and
numerical results was observed. The ratio (VEC3/VFEM) varies from
1.11 to 1.4, which clearly indicates that the results obtained from the
EC3 design method are on the unsafe side when compared to the
numerical results. Fig. 14 shows that for castellated beams with intermediate plates the ratio (VEC3/VFEM) increases as the web thickness decreases. Furthermore, the ratio (VEC3/VFEM) also increases as the yield
stress increases or as the ratio h0/dw decreases, as it is illustrated in
Figs. 15 and 16. From these observations, it can be concluded that the
difference between the numerical and the EC3 [5] ultimate loads increases as the class of the perforated cross-section approaches the limits
of class 4. The parametric study has also shown that castellated beams
with intermediate plates are more likely to fail by web-post buckling.
Perhaps this might indicate that the approach proposed in the Eurocode
3 Annex N, for predicting critical shear force causing web-post buckling,
has to be modied for castellated beams with intermediate plates.
Experimental investigations are then required to improve the design
method for this type of beams.
8. Conclusions
A nite element model was proposed to evaluate the resistance of
castellated beams with hexagonal and octagonal openings. The numerical results have been validated by comparison with experimental
data available in the literature. A limited sensitivity study has shown
that the model is not signicantly affected by a change of the maximum amplitude of the initial lateral deection taken in the shape of
the lowest buckling mode.
114
Based upon the results of the present study, within the limited
range of the considered parameters, the following conclusions can
be drawn:
For thin webbed castellated beams classied as class 3 and 4 with
higher height web openings, failure would occur by web-post
buckling with limited plastic zones.
For thin webbed castellated beams with deeper tee-sections, the
less accurate obtained results suggests that failure would probably
occurs by local buckling of the web of the tee-sections and should
then be classied as class 4, which is in agreement with the ENV
1993-1-1 Annex N [5] cross-section classication.
Variation of the ratio PFEM/Py with the cross-section classes suggests that the cross-section classication of ENV1993-1-1 Annex
N [5] is reasonably well dened, although the boundaries between
classes were not dened in this study.
Castellated beams with intermediate plates are more susceptible
to web-post buckling compared to castellated beams without
such plates. The results have also shown that the use of these
plates should be restricted to beams classied as class 2 and its
height should not exceed 15% of the overall height of the opening.
The performed comparative study has also shown that the results
obtained from the design method ENV 1993-1-1 Annex N [5] give
close and safe results compared to the numerical results, except
for castellated beams with intermediate plates classied as class
3, which requires further investigations to improve the existing
design method for this type of beams.
References
[1] Kerdal D, Nethercot DA. Failure modes for castellated beams. J Constr Steel Res
1984;4:295315.
[2] Zaarour W, Redwood RG. Web buckling in thin webbed castellated beams. J Struct
Div Proc ASCE 1996;122(8):8606.
[3] Megharief J. Behavior of castellated beams. Master Thesis, Department of Civil
Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 1997.
[4] Redwood RG, Demirdjian S. Castellated beam web buckling in shear. J Struct Div
Proc ASCE 1998;124(10):12027.
[5] ENV 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 11: general rules and
rules for buildings, 1992, and amendment A2 of Eurocode 3: Annex N Openings
in Webs. British Standards Institution; 1998.
[6] EN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures part 1.1: general rules and
rules for buildings. CEN; 2005.
[7] Design of composite beams with large openings for services. The steel construction institute publication document RT959 version 05; May 2006.
[8] Chung KF, Liu TCH, Ko ACH. Investigation on Vierendeel mechanism in steel
beams with circular web openings. J Constr Steel Res 2001;57(5):46790.
[9] Chung KF, Liu CH, Ko ACH. Steel beams with large web openings of various shapes
and sizes: an empirical design method using a generalised momentshear interaction curve. J Constr Res 2003;59:1177200.
[10] Redwood RG, Cho SH. Design of steel and composite beams with web openings. J
Constr Steel Res 1993;25:2341.
[11] Darwin D. Steel and composite beams with web openings. American Institute of
Steel Construction, Steel Design Guide Series No. 2. Chicago, IL; 1990.
[12] Blodgett OW. Design of welded structures. Cleveland, OH: The James F Lincoln Arc
Welding Foundation; 1966.
[13] Delesques R. Stabilit des montants de poutres ajoures. Construction Mtallique
1968;3:2633 [Paris].
[14] Aglan AA, Redwood RG. Web buckling in castellated beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, 57; 1974. p. 304d320.
[15] Dougherty BK. Buckling of web-posts in perforated beams. J Struct Div Proc ASCE
1981;107(ST3):50718.
[16] Ward JK. Design of composite and non-composite cellular beams. The Steel Construction Institute Publication, 100; 1990.
[17] Bitar D, Demarco T, Martin PO. Steel and composite cellular beamsNovel approach for design based on experimental studies and numerical investigations.
Proc.4th Eurosteel Conference, Maastricht; June 2005.
[18] Bitar D, Martin PO, Gala Y, Demarco T. Steel and composite cellular beams part
1: proposal of a model for the web-post resistance. Rev Constr Mtallique 2006;
n1.
[19] Lawson RM, Lim J, Hicks SJ, Simms WI. Design of composite asymmetric cellular beams and beams with large web openings. J Constr Steel Res 2006;62:
61429.
[20] Mohebkhah A. The Moment-gradient factor in lateraltorsional buckling on inelastic castellated beams. J Constr Steel Res 2004;60:148194.
[21] Mohebkhah A, Showkati H. Bracing requirements for inelastic castellated beams. J
Constr Steel Res 2005;61:137386.
[22] Lusas 13. Lusas Manual, nite element analysis Ltd. Version 13.5, UK, 2003.
[23] Wang AJ, Chung KF. Advanced nite element modeling of perforated composite
beams with exible shear connectors. Eng Struct 2008;30:272438.
[24] Chung KF, Ko CH, Wang AJ. Design of steel and composite beams with web openings verication using nite element method. Steel Compos Struct April & June
2005;5(23):20334.
[25] Shafer BW, Pekz T. A Computational modeling of cold-formed steel: characterizing geometric imperfections and residual stresses. J Constr Steel Res 1998;47:
193210.
[26] EN 1993-1-5. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures part 15: plated structural
elements, CEN; 2006.