Journal of Dalian University of Technology

4 4 3
2 0 04 5

Vol . 44, No. 3

May 2 0 0 4

: 1000-8608( 2004) 03-0350-06

* ,
( , 116024 )

: 6 , ET A BS , 5
pushov er ,
pusho ver . , ,
, .

: ; pushover ; ;
: T U 352. 1; T U 313
: A

pusho ver
,
, ,
,
,
[ 1] . Pushov er
,
,

.
pushover
[ 2]

.
pushov er
.

,
[ 1] . Collins[ 3] 4
pushover ,
; Mw af y
[ 4]

8
12 8
pushover ,

[ 5]

5 15

20 pushover ,

: 2003-03-20; : 2004-03-10.
: ( 50008003; 59895410) .
: * ( 1966-) , , , .

pushover . ,
, 12
,
[ 2]

. , 12
pushov er
. 6
, 5
pushov er ,

pushover
.

1Pushover
6 .
, F i
mi
W i
h i i
; V b ; Aj
Cj j
; F ij
X ij
j i ;
F t ,
, n .
( 1) ( L U )

( ) D,

w i / w m V b

Fi =

pushov er

m= 1

( 2) ( L IA )
,

n
m= 1

( 3) ( RES97)
,
( SRSS)
, .

2
Qij

m= i

RES97 U BC97 .
6 3 . ( a)
: ,
( LU
CL P , CLP L U ) ; ( b)

, ; RES97

F m j , Q i =

pusho ver , D2 ,
, D1 + D2 + D3 + + Dn = D.

:
( L IA
UBC97RES97. UBC97

F ij = Aj Cj X ij W i
Q ij =

D1,

3 , LU

w i h i / w m hm V b

Fi =

351

j= 1

F i = Q i - Qi+ 1
( 4) UBC97
V ,

L IA) ; ( c) :
( L IA2) .

2
ET ABS , 5

P i = ( V - F t ) w i hi / w m h m

( 2 15 , 5
9

m= 1

( 5) ( L IA2)

12 , 1) pushover ,

L IA , h 2

. RES97

Fi =

w i hi / w mh m V b
2

95% .

m= 1

( 6) ( CL P )
,

1 5
Fig . 1 F ive a sy mmetr ic fra mes

( 1) 2 ( C2) , 2. 025

6. 36 104 kg . [ 3] .

m, 1. 2 m . 1
2

( 3) 9 ( S9) , 7. 62 m , 1

250 mm 200 mm, 150 mm 250 m m,

4. 57 m, 3. 96 m ;

150 mm 250 mm , f c = 20. 77 M Pa.

, , 1 4

( 2) 5 ( S5) , 1
2 4. 57
m, 3
4 9. 14 m . 1 4. 57

7. 56 104 kg, 5 8 5. 07 104 kg , 9

4. 01 104 kg . [ 3] .

m, 3. 96 m . ,

( 4) 12 ( S12) , 7. 32 m, 1

, 1

4. 57 m , 3. 96 m;

6. 41 10 5. 46 10 kg ,

, , 1

352

7. 63 104 kg, 2 8 7. 58 104 kg , 9 10

4

44

. , LP , ( x y , y y ) ( x p , y p )

5. 06 10 kg , 1112 2. 53 10

, K 1

2. 01 10 kg . [ 3] .

, D , R K 1
R sp
R Fp
R E R D

( 5) 15 ( C15) ,
3. 0 m , 6. 0 m. 450 mm

; , s ,

450 mm( 1 5 ) , 500 mm 500 m m( 1

n .

5 ) , 400 m m 450 m m( 6 16 ) ,

15 C15

500 mm 500 mm ( 6 16 ) .
9 500 mm 550 mm, 250

, .
( 1)

mm 550 mm, C35.

1 2 , L U
CLP

pusho ver

RES97
L IA
UBC97 L IA2
, ,

. ,

. , LU

( 1 )

, ,

; L IA2 ,
, , L U

69% .

. 1 4 2 3
1 C15 pusho ver
T ab. 1Result s o f pushov er analysis fo r C15 under different load patter ns
LP

( x y , y y) / ( m m, k N )

( x p , y p ) / ( m m, k N ) K 1 / ( kN mm - 1 )

RK 1

Rsp

RF p

RE

RD

LU

( 175. 07, 1 370. 50)

( 345. 28, 1 588. 98)

7. 83

1. 97

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

C LP

( 175. 07, 1 370. 50)

( 353. 17, 1 579. 84)

7. 83

2. 02

1. 00

1. 02

0. 99

1. 03

1. 03

RES 97

( 191. 40, 1 294. 16)

( 419. 90, 1 554. 31)

6. 76

2. 19

0. 86

1. 22

0. 98

1. 11

1. 11

LIA

( 222. 52, 1 298. 44)

( 476. 54, 1 441. 16)

5. 84

2. 14

0. 75

1. 38

0. 91

1. 09

1. 09

U BC97

( 259. 40, 1 292. 20)

( 531. 32, 1 432. 06)

4. 98

2. 05

0. 64

1. 54

0. 90

1. 04

1. 04

LIA 2

( 243. 93, 1 231. 57)

( 583. 88, 1 390. 04)

5. 05

2. 39

0. 64

1. 69

0. 87

1. 21

1. 21

2LU pusho ver

T ab. 2R esults of pusho ver analy sis under t he unifo rm lo ad patter n LU

K 1 / ( kN mm - 1 )

sp / mm

T 1/ s

E / ( k N mm)

C2

22. 53

36. 55

168. 68

0. 11

5. 36 104

6. 61

S5

5. 44

533. 40

1 395. 25

2. 51

5. 33 105

2. 79

S9

11. 88

443. 48

3 578. 06

2. 20

1. 03 106

1. 79

S12
C15

13. 15
7. 83

519. 43
345. 28

4 406. 94
1 588. 98

2. 43
2. 57

1. 50 106

2. 08
1. 97

F p / kN

3. 82 105

3 C2 S5
T ab. 3Result s r elated t o to p-displacement and base shear for C2 and S5 under different load patter ns
LP

RK 1
C 2S 5

R sp

RE

C2S5

C2S5

RF p

RD

C2S 5

C2S 5

LU

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

CLP

1. 00

1. 00

1. 02

1. 04

0. 94

1. 05

0. 99

0. 98

1. 02

1. 06

LIA

0. 87

0. 80

1. 17

1. 21

1. 06

1. 10

0. 90

0. 86

1. 13

1. 25

U BC97

0. 87

0. 77

1. 17

1. 26

1. 06

1. 19

0. 90

0. 84

1. 10

1. 28

RES 97

0. 85

0. 77

1. 18

1. 31

1. 06

1. 12

0. 89

0. 86

1. 12

1. 31

LIA 2

0. 72

0. 69

1. 01

1. 37

0. 79

1. 13

0. 79

0. 78

0. 85

1. 45

353

4 S9 S12
T ab. 4Results related to t op-displacement and base shea r fo r S9 and S12 under differ ent load pat terns
RK 1

LP

S9S12

R sp

RE

S 9S 12

S 9S12

RF p

RD

S9S12

S9S 12

LU

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

1. 00

CLP

1. 00

1. 00

1. 14

1. 18

0. 95

1. 03

1. 21

1. 27

1. 14

1. 18

LIA

0. 69

0. 83

1. 65

1. 16

0. 87

0. 97

1. 61

1. 15

1. 29

0. 84

U BC97

0. 67

0. 77

1. 51

1. 24

0. 87

0. 92

1. 40

1. 11

1. 18

0. 88

RES 97

0. 64

0. 60

1. 28

1. 45

0. 80

0. 88

1. 04

1. 30

1. 02

1. 00

LIA 2

0. 58

0. 69

1. 13

1. 37

0. 68

0. 90

0. 76

1. 25

0. 95

1. 06

( 2)

, RES97 U BC97 3

1 2 , ,

, 9 ,

; L U

, ,

CL P .

, .
.

3 ( C15)
Fig. 3 St or ey drift rat io ( C15)

2 ( C15)
F ig . 2 Relation of top displacement and base shear
( C15)

5 pushover
,

( 3)
3 ,

( 1)
1 4, C2 S5, LU

CL P
L IA
UBC97
RES97 LIA 2 6

( LU
CL P ) 1 ,

, . 2

( L IA
UBC97
RES97) 2 ,

C2, L IA 2

( L IA2) 3 . ,

, C2 2 1

9 , L U , L IA2 ,

, L IA 2

2 ; 9 ,

, ,

, U BC97 .

. C2 ( 0. 11 s) ,

( 4)

, 3

; S5 ( 2. 51 s) ,

, ,

, , .

. S9
S12 C15,

354

44

L U
CL P
LIA
RES97
U BC97 L IA2

) .

S12 C15

. C2
S 5 S9 3 ,

, . ,

S9, L IA2 ,

. S9 5

, LU CLP ,

S12 C15. ,

, L U CL P

, 3

. L U

( 3)

, CLP

L U , L U

( 2)

C2 S5, 6

3 4 ,

; S9

C2 S9,

S12 C15, ,

S5, ;

L IA2,

S12

C15, (

, , .

4 ( C2
S5
S9 S12)
F ig . 4 Stor ey drift r atio ( C2, S5, S9 and S12)

, ,
pushover
.

pushov er , ,

pushover .
, ,
, ,

, ,
pushover .

355

20( 4-6) : 452-464.

[ 2] G B 500112001, [ S] . :
, 2001.
[ 3] CO L L IN S K R. I nv estig atio n of pusho ver analysis
pr ocedur es

for

per for mance -based

reliabilit y-based
design

a sy mmetr ic building

w ith

structures

and

applicatio ns
[ A] .

to

Research

Report UMCEE 99-11 [ R ] . M ichigan: U niv ersit y of

M ichig an, 1999.
[ 4] M WA FY A M , EL N A SHAI A S . Static pushover

v er sus dynamic co llapse analy sis o f RC buildings

[ 1] K RA W IN KL ER H, SEN EVI RA T N A G D P K .
P ro s and cons of a push-ov er a nalysis o f seismic
per for mance ev aluation [ J] .

Eng Struct ,

1998,

[ J] . Eng Struct, 2001, 23( 5) : 407-424.

[ 5] , .
[ J] . , 2001, 17( 5) : 8-13.

Static nonlinear analysis of asymmetric structures

under different load patterns
LIGang* , LIUYong
( State Key Lab. of Struct . Anal. for Ind. Equi p. , Dalian Univ . of Technol . , Dali an 116024, Chi na )

Abstract: Select ing an appropriate load pat t ern is very im port ant in t he pushov er analysis. F iv e t ypes
of t he asy mmet ric st eel and t he reinf orced co ncrete f rames are st udied by t he pushover analysis under
six dif ferent lo ad pat t erns using ET ABS prog ram, and t he ef fect s of load pat t erns, st ruct ural
asy mmet ry, st orey numbers and higher vibrat io n modes on t he resul ts of t he pushover analysis are
discussed. T he results sho w t hat t he result s of t he pushover analysis o f t he asy mmet ric st ruct ures
w ith weak stif fness sto rey are diff erent under diff erent lo ad pat t erns, and t he diff erence w ill increase
w ith t he increase o f t he st ruct ural fundamental period, st orey number and t he sev erit y of the w eak
st if fness st or ey .
Key words: stat ic no nlinear analy sis; pushover analysis; load pat t er n; asy mmet ric st ruct ure