You are on page 1of 7

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 1 of 7

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil


Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them
Aaron Black, Polaris Laboratories
Tags: oil analysis

Machinery Lubrication (4/2015)

Lost revenue due to equipment downtime is often a direct result of some type of
contamination, whether from dirt, water, an incorrect lubricant or a combination of these. Oil
analysis testing can identify these contaminants, but unless you are aware of the issues that
can arise from them, it can be difficult to take the appropriate actions. This article will review
the most common contamination types, the oil analysis tests most likely to indicate them,
normal test results when these contaminants are present, and recommended actions for
correcting each problem.

Abrasives
Abrasives are the top problem-inducing contaminants because they tend to cause the most
damage. They are more likely to be hard contaminants and be in sizes that are well within
your clearance ranges. The most prevalent forms of abrasives are dust or dirt and product or
process contamination. If there is a process that includes any level of particulate, it is
possible for this particulate to get into the lubricating system and cause damage no matter
how soft the particle is.

Abrasives

Degradation from abrasive contamination comes primarily in the form of equipment wear, but
another less widespread lubricant degradation problem can also occur. Abrasive wear or
cutting wear is usually found in systems with a sliding motion load somewhere in the unit.
Commonly with thrust bearings or other softer metal bearings, the abrasive can wedge into
the soft metal and gouge the harder steel surface. This is not to say that you cant have
copper-alloy cutting wear. The metal produced depends on the contact surfaces in the path of
the abrasive contamination and the hardness of the contaminant.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 2 of 7

Cutting wear

Systems with rolling actions such as rolling-element bearings, gear teeth, etc., are more
likely to have pitting from abrasive contamination. As particulates roll through the load zone,
the extreme pressure exerted on the contact point between the races and the rolling
elements can pit the surfaces, forming cracks and initiating fatigue wear and spalling.

Fatigue/pitting

While lubricant degradation usually comes from another source, you may see some lost
lubricant life from abrasive contamination. When a unit is wearing, the metal released by the
abrasives can become a catalyst, and these particles increase the available surface area on
which lubricants can form degradation byproducts.
Identifying abrasive contamination and wear is generally done through metals testing. If oil
analysis is performed, what you typically will see with plain abrasive/dirt contamination is an
elevation of the metals that are in direct contact with the abrasives. In gears, this will tend to
be high iron levels with low alloy metals (chrome, nickel, manganese, etc.) and an increase
in silicon and possibly aluminum if there is enough contamination.
Particle counting is another common test used to monitor contamination. However, keep in
mind that a particle count is not selective in the particulate it is counting. Additional testing
will be needed to determine the type of contaminant (water, air, dirt, fibers, metals, etc.).
Typical recommendations will include repairing the ingression point and filtering the lubricant,
which are not always feasible. The protection of the equipment should be the analysts first
and foremost concern when making recommendations. If filtration is not an option, changing
the lubricant may be suggested. This is not as optimal as filtration, but when you have
contamination, it is likely that the new lubricant will be much cleaner than the lubricant in the
sump and can in effect dilute the problem contaminant, reducing the abrasive wear.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 3 of 7

Some type of exception testing may also be recommended. This will depend on whether
there is obvious wear in the system. Analytical ferrography or filter patch analysis can help
determine the extent of the damage and if you need to take immediate action.

Water
Water is the second most common contaminant that can cause equipment problems. There
are three forms of water: dissolved, emulsified and free.
Dissolved water is usually benign except in extreme cases that require exceptionally low
moisture levels. This form of water generally enters the lubricant via humidity or a similar
process. The lubricant simply absorbs the water up to the saturation point and does not
exhibit any signs of water contamination such as clouding.
Emulsified water is the most damaging form of water contamination. It occurs when the
amount of water is beyond the saturation point and has likely entered the lubricating stream.
A mixing action in the equipment may have emulsified the water, or it may be a function of a
lubricant additive. Regardless, the initial identifier of this type of water contamination is that
the lubricant is usually cloudy. This cloudiness comes from the water becoming small droplets
within the oil. Emulsified water is the most damaging because it is free flowing with all of the
lubricant and will be in the load zone.

Lubricant degradation

Free water is somewhat less damaging than emulsified water but is still problematic. Some
lubricants will not hold water in suspension past the saturation point, so it falls to the bottom
of the sump. Among the problems resulting from this type of contamination include allowing
water to become part of the lubricating stream, impacting the lubricants ability to shed water
(demulsibility) and letting it emulsify, initiating biological contamination that will further
degrade the oil, and plugging the filter. There is also the possibility of a safety hazard if free
water is allowed to continue to enter the sump and overflow it.
With water contamination, there is just as much if not more damage to the lubricant as there
is to the equipment. The main source of equipment degradation will be rust. Any time you
have a degraded lubricant with water contamination, there is the possibility of rust on nearly
any iron/steel surface. Rust is very hard (harder than steel) and creates abrasive particles in
addition to the existing water problem.
Another problem with water contamination involves hydrogen embrittlement. In this
phenomenon, water is cracked into oxygen and hydrogen, and the hydrogen is absorbed into

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 4 of 7

metal surfaces. This creates a harder but more brittle surface that is unable to flex as needed
for rolling elements to work properly. This results in cracking of the rolling surfaces and
spalling.
In regards to lubricant degradation, the primary issue is having water in the equipments load
zone. Water in a load zone is incapable of supporting a load, so the load continuously
collapses onto a much thinner lubricant film. This allows significant surface-to-surface
contact, which leads to wear.
Water contamination will also cause premature aging of the lubricant. It is estimated that
water in a lubricant can reduce the lubricants lifespan by one-tenth. In addition, water in a
lubricant sump can produce sludge. This is primarily a factor of simple premature aging of
the lubricant but should be considered because it can give rise to a number of other issues
such as thickening of the lubricants viscosity, preventing splash lubrication or plugging a
filter.

Equipment degradation

Water usually does not enter a lubricating system by itself. External machine surfaces tend to
be dirty, and the water will suspend this dirt and then enter the system with it. This not only
causes water damage to the lubricant but also abrasive damage to the equipment.
In many cases, water contamination can be identified onsite with a visual test, as emulsified
water in oil will become milky. However, air entrainment is another potential issue with
cloudy oil, so you should go beyond just a visual test.
The hot-plate crackle test can also be used to check for water onsite as well as at most
commercial laboratories. You can perform a go/no-go test by simply raising the hot-plate
temperature to 320 degrees F and seeing if the sample sizzles like bacon when you put it on
the surface. Of course, this should be done with caution, since hot liquid can spatter if there
is a lot of water. Other methods are also available, but the hot plate provides a good initial
detection for general-purpose analysis.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 5 of 7

Water contamination can often be identified with a visual test. The hot-plate crackle test can
also be used to check for water contamination.

For a more exact measurement or to detect water at very low levels, have a Karl Fischer
water test done. There are multiple variations of this test, including coulometric and
volumetric, but they all have similar capabilities. Check to see which is being performed and
if it will meet your needs. Coulometric tends to be more accurate at lower levels, while
volumetric is usually better at higher levels. Certain additives, such as those that contain
sulfur, can interfere with this type of test and should be taken into account.
Typical oil analysis recommendations include correcting the source of water. This should be
done before any further action is taken. In some applications, water must be removed
continually, and the water ingression cannot be prevented.
The next most common recommendation is to change the lubricant. This may be suggested
in conjunction with other water-removal options (water drain-off, dehydration, centrifuge,
etc.), depending on the labs knowledge of the sump size and the sites capabilities.

Incorrect Lubricant
Incorrect lubricant problems come in a myriad of forms. The most common include using a
mineral oil in a glycol-based lubricant sump, missing additives/wrong additives and the wrong
viscosity.
With a mineral oil in a glycol-based sump, you tend to see increased viscosity and sludge
formation due to the chemical reaction between the hydrocarbon and glycol products. Once
this chemical reaction begins, you may notice excessive wear, as the lubricant viscosity is
excessively high. Since the two lubricants do not typically mix, you may also observe
elevated wear because the load-zone lubricant film will not be a single lubricant and could
have a reduced load-carrying capability. Significantly reduced lubricant life is also likely to
result.
Because of the increased viscosity and sludge formation, you may have slow-flowing or even
plugged filters. Acid formation as a degradation byproduct can also increase and attack the
lubricated surfaces.
Viscosity testing and metals analysis are the primary methods used to identify a mineral oil in
a glycol-based sump. Information about the lubricant in use will be required by the analyst to
properly interpret the results.
If a mineral/glycol contamination issue is discovered, the likely recommendation would be to
flush the sump. There is no other filtration option for a lubricant contaminated in this
manner, so the contamination must be physically removed.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 6 of 7

Another recommendation might be to review the relubrication practices, since this type of
contamination usually is the result of misidentification of the lubricant(s) in question.
Please note that while the latest glycols derived from butylene are far more compatible with
mineral oils than those using propylene and ethylene, the analysis of these new glycols is still
evolving. This should be taken into consideration when evaluating oil analysis data from a
glycol-based lubricant system.
Missing or wrong additives can lead to many potential problems. It is common to see a
missing extreme-pressure (EP) or anti-wear (AW) additive in gear, bearing and hydraulic
applications. If you are missing one of these additives and the equipment requires it,
excessive rubbing wear and severe sliding wear could occur, depending on the tolerances and
workload. These additives physically separate the loaded surfaces when the lubricant
viscosity is insufficient, and without them you will be contacting these loaded surfaces.
If a lubricant with a detergency additive is put into a system designed to shed water, the
detergency additive will ruin this shedding property of the lubricant. Generally, the only
solution is to remove and completely replace the lubricant or risk having water ingression
cause significant bearing wear. This problem is most common when dealing with large turbine
sumps that have been contaminated with diesel engine oil. Consider that as little as a quart
of diesel engine oil can destroy the demulsibility of 2,000 gallons of turbine oil.

This sample also had mildly elevated silicon levels.

If a system with yellow metal (copper alloys) has a manufacturers recommendation to not
use an EP additive, this is usually because the EP additive would be highly corrosive to the
yellow metals when the additive reaches activation temperatures. In these instances, a
metals test should be conducted to reveal the problem. This test can detect additives and
allow you to see changes in the additive levels. Oxidation or nitration tests may also be
helpful.
In addition, you may be able to identify an incorrect additive with an infrared spectrum
comparison/overlay. With this test, two lubricants can be overlaid on a single graph to
determine if there are any chemical signature differences in the infrared signal. This is not a
typical test and should be viewed as an exception test in most cases.
For these types of issues, the common recommendations will include using exception testing
(analytical ferrography, etc.), which can reveal the extent of surface degradation if there are
wear problems. Another recommendation would be to check the manufacturers specifications
as well as the operating temperatures and how they relate to the lubricant selection.
The more widespread issue with an incorrect lubricant involves using the wrong viscosity. If
the viscosity is too high, you may see increased wear in gear systems due to reduced or no
splashing ability (if the system requires splash lubrication). In hydraulics, a high viscosity can

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

3 Common Contaminants and the Oil Analysis Tests That Can Detect Them

Page 7 of 7

lead to slow performance and low filtration rates. In nearly all low-viscosity situations, the
result will be elevated wear. This is because the fluid film is not thick enough to prevent
surface-to-surface contact during operation.
To detect a viscosity problem, perform a viscosity test. Also, consider conducting a baseline
test on the new lubricant, as viscosities can change from batch to batch, and a lubricant topup using a similar lubricant with a different viscosity may not be readily apparent. In
addition, you may be able to identify this issue with metals testing, since additive levels will
commonly fluctuate along with a viscosity change, even within the same product line.
The recommendations for viscosity problems can be fairly involved. This is because along
with the possibility of having put a lubricant with the wrong viscosity into a machine, there
may have also been an operating change that has affected the machine and caused the
issue. For example, if the ambient temperature has increased, the viscosity may now be too
low for the operating temperature, and wear may start to occur.
Outside of this possibility, the most common recommendation will be to change the oil in the
sump. If the sump size is significant, it may be suggested to sweeten the oil or drain off a
portion and replace it with fresh lubricant to improve the viscosity.
Please keep in mind that these are only a small portion of the problems that may arise and
that laboratory testing capabilities are an ever-changing field. New technologies and
improved methods are constantly becoming available. If you have a specific issue that
requires testing, contact your oil analysis lab and be sure to get the best, most effective
testing you can find.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Articles/Print/30109

20/07/2016

You might also like