5

DF51

A
1673 8330 2015 02 0005 16

DOI:10.13893/j.cnki.bffx.2015.02.001

2009 1 1720

9 50

52

I 2010 257

24

258

911

2015 2

258259

2010 81

260267

119
2012 311 Cfr. Savigny

KiefnerDas echtsverhltniss. 149. 168

9 50

1814

1840
1814

313
285305

123124

2003 98

WindscheidLehrbuch des PandektenrechtsBd. 1ss. 38f. Anm. 2. 169

169 3

169

2015 2

1
2 3

194 1

2005 3 115

115

116 31

115116

118119

 10

9 50

Motive

19

19

2009 52

http / / www. civillaw. com. cn / article / default. asp id = 25437 2006

3 27

2011 59

Heinz HbnerAllgemeiner Teil des BGB

2. Auflage
1996s. 51.

24

1961 197

K. H 2003 217

2015 2

11

Cfr. . von JheringScherz und Erenst in der Jurisprudenz

4ed
1891p. 418. 221

2001 650651

G 1996 161

221

 12

9 50

2013 107

121
42 1979 122

46 1979 266

2005 1 24

2006 11

87
89
2012 75

2004 5 13

2015 2

13

16
15

42

2004 78

1 1972 76

2 1972 88

3 1960 300

119
2 1957 118

1994 2
2004 2

1924

 14

9 50

2012 105

2013 145

2011 147

6 2007 408

2012

2009 95

2006 217

46

2009 32 1

2015 2

15

1979 31

2003 7677

103

16

9 50

1
2

1.
Merkel

2.

2007 5354

3334

2015 2

17

3.

1
2
3 4

20 70

5556

1994 387

2010 126

130131

146

2001 291

387

 18

9 50

2015 2

19

1.

20

9 50

2.

3. 19

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

The Status of the Claim ights in the Civil Code

the Guiding Conception of Civil Law in China
WEI Zhen ying
Abstract The legal relation theory proposed by Savigny and claim rights theory by Windscheid are fundamental theoretical grounds for German Civil Code These theories bear the features of concept law based on individualism as their guiding conception German Civil Code is advanced in theory and scientific in system
Howeveras the society and jurisprudence developthe guiding conception and system have become less advanced Thusthe Civil Code in China should learn from German Civil Code in a reformative and innovative
way The guiding conception of civil law in China is human orientedin which humanis the integration
of being individualsocial and historic Each person is the purpose of their own and also others The normative structure of the Civil Code in our country should be centered on civil legal relation While fundamental
rights are not the basis for establishing claim rights system Besidesclaim rights for performance of obligation
should be separated from claims for assumption of liability Accordinglythe claim rights system should be established with the distinction of civil obligation and civil liability
Key words civil code system
ented

legal relation

claim rights

guiding conception of civil law

human ori-