Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As noted above, we support the City's consideration of expanding the Program. Previous reasons
for limiting the Program area to south of 1oth Avenue will be addressed via installation of fire
rings and associated maintenance, and the additional space afforded by an expanded Program
area will serve to increase separation between fire rings to help aid in the dispersal of smoke and
other potential fire-related impacts (e.g., noise, etc.). As noted in our June 6, 2016letter,
expanding the Program area to gth Avenue and allowing 12 fire rings would provide almost 200
feet of linear beach area between each fire ring device.
We also recommend that the City adopt an LCP-consistent minimum 25-foot setback from the
bluff. As we understand it, the purpose of the Program is to allow the City flexibility in
implementing the Program, including adapting to changing shoreline conditions that may require
that the fire devices be relocated closer to the bluff during winter months. During the winter
when the beach is narrower, the fire rings will need to be removed from the beach and/or
relocated closer to the bluff to prevent potential inundation during high tides and wave-driven
up-rush and to allow for continued active use of the beach. The current LCP policy requires only
a minimum 25-foot setback, which gives the City the flexibility to site the fire rings in locations
that protect health and safety while allowing for this important recreational use. When the beach
is at its widest, the fire rings can be placed farther away from the bluff while still allowing plenty
of area for more active use of the beach.
With regard to hours of use, the LCP requires that beach fires be allowed for cooking and
warmth between the hours of7am and 10pm daily. However, we understand that the City is
considering pursuing a reduction in the hours of use (from 4pm to lOpm) in order to address
potential impacts from beach fires and to allow beach users an opportunity to enjoy the beach
and shoreline path during a larger portion of the day when fires are not present. We are sensitive
to the City's concern, and, though not LCP consistent, we agree that it makes sense to try a
variety of options to address identified concerns. Following the pilot phase, we would expect that
Program parameters would gel, and we would expect that an LCP amendment to codify
established Program elements could then follow (see also below). However, we believe that the
reduction from the LCP-identified 15 hours of potential fires down to six hours is too limiting.
We recommend that a more appropriate balance is to allow beach fires to start at 2pm as part of
the pilot phase (thus reducing the LCP-identified timeframe by about half).
On the issue of propane devices, and as indicated above, we support the City's intent to introduce
propane-fueled devices on the beach for cooking and warmth. This option provides a different
means of providing for public recreational activity, and we are interested in seeing how this
option functions on Carmel Beach. We understand that the City is no longer pursuing providing
such devices for free (i.e., funded by the City and provided to users for free, as was indicated to
our Commission), and are interested in seeing how the public adapts to this option. As with the
timing, the LCP will need to be appropriately amended to allow propane-fueled devices once the
Program parameters are better set after the pilot phase. In the same vein, we encourage the City
to seek opportunities to retain charcoal-fueled barbeques, or similar, for cooking. These are
specifically authorized under the LCP and have historically been a popular component of the
City's Beach Fire Management Program.
The Program must also contain a robust maintenance and monitoring component, including one
that allows for adaptation over time. The issue of smoke from beach fires and charcoal debris in
the sand are central to the development of the City's Program in.the first place, and itwill be
critical to have both bona fide data to support Program elements going forward, as well as robust
maintenance to keep the beach clean. With regard to air quality monitoring, we envision the
Program containing a requirement to monitor air quality and the effects of smoke on beachgoers,
pathway users, and nearby residents. The monitoring should provide broad coverage of the
overall beach area, including providing monitoring associated with non-fire ring areas (as a
control) as well as the fire-ring areas to allow comparisons to be accurately made between data
collected from both areas. Monitoring should also include data on PM2.5 as well as
corresponding meteorological data (including wind speeds and directions) associated with each
monitoring station, and provide as clear a representation as possible of the amount ofPM2.5
correlated to beach fires as opposed to other sources. We recommend that the City use all of the
components that we recommended in our December 2015 staff report on this topic to form the
basis for such a Pro gram.
In addition, we view the pilot Program as an adaptive management tool that can provide the City
the flexibility to shape the beach fire Program as needed to address coastal resource issues and
public access needs over time. It will be critical that adaptation measures are clearly built into the
Program, and again we recommend that you start with the adaptive management components that
we recommended in our December 2015 staff report on this topic to form the basis for such a
program. We believe that an appropriate pilot phase would run three years, with adaptation
possible over the course of all three years as needed, and with a regular annual reporting and
modification element that includes City and Commission staff consultation and agreement on
potential changes. Following the three-year pilot period, we would expect that Program
parameters would be better settled, and a longer term CDP, as well as an LCP amendment to
codify changes, could be pursued at that time.
Finally, we note again that the City's current weekend beach fire prohibition is not pem1itted and
cannot be enforced under the LCP. We recommend that you take steps to eliminate this
prohibition, including in light of the pilot Progran1 to be installed, as part of any action on the
City's Beach Fire Management Program.
Once again, thank you very much for the opportunity to work with your staff to resolve issues
associated with the City's Beach Fire Management Program. As indicated above, we strongly
recommend that the Program be modified as recommended in tllis letter. If it is, we believe that it
can be fmmd LCP and Coastal Act consistent and that, barring unforeseen changes or additional
information/understanding, we would recommend that the Coastal Commission not take
jurisdiction over such a Program should the City's approval of the Program be appealed to the
Coastal Commission.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at our Santa Cruz office if I or my staff can help in any way
to move such a beach fire management program to fruition. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
/h~Wd~
DanCarl
Central Coast District Director
California Coastal Commission