Lecture in PSYS 324 (Psychology of Women) on Economic & Political Life Date: March 31, 2016 I evaluated Ms. Kuchtas forty-five minute lecture in Psychology of Women on March 31, 2016. Ms. Kuchta is a graduate student in the Department of Psychological Science who serves as the teaching assistant for my Psychology of Women course. Because I knew she had a desire to gain teaching experience, I offered her the opportunity to teach one class which she took advantage of, despite her busy schedule. Ms. Kuchta lectured on the economic and political life of women, which included issues of power, status, and achievement. More specifically, Ms. Kuchta discussed research attempting to understand the low rates of women in high positions of power, including difficulty forming informal networks at work and repercussions women face when they are successful in positions of power. Below is an evaluation of the clarity of the presentation, skills in communicating with students, and overall strengths and weaknesses. 1. Clarity of presentation and explanations Ms. Kuchta used PowerPoint slides during her lecture. Her slides were clear and concise enough information was given to guide the presentation, but they were not overwhelming. Ms. Kuchta has a nice presentation style. She is very comfortable speaking in front of the class, delivered the lecture at an appropriate pace, had nice transitions between slides and topics, and is very knowledgeable about the material. 2. Instructor's skills in communicating with students Ms. Kuchta has a very approachable demeanor. It was clear the students felt comfortable enough to ask questions. In addition, when she answered, she confirmed with students that her answer was clear and addressed their initial question/s. She also nicely incorporated examples relevant to the college-aged population to help illustrate concepts. For example, she incorporated data from her undergraduate research project to help illustrate the concept of how gender roles can influence perceptions of female leaders. This appeared to be very relatable to college-aged students, as students appeared very interested in this material. Overall Strengths: One of the biggest strengths of Ms. Kuchtas presentation was that she used data from a previous research project to illustrate a concept and bring the research to life. In addition, her presentation was clearly organized, she very nicely transitioned from one concept to the next (making the lecture feel like a cohesive story), and she lectured at a nice pace. Weaknesses and/or Suggestions: In the future, Ms. Kuchtas lectures could be even further strengthened by incorporating more non-lecture components. Using activities such as the think-pair-share technique, discussion questions, or short activities may help encourage participation from the quieter students and give the students exposure to the material using different approaches.