2011 (6)

 (33)      _ 

    
 
Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Engineering Sciences Series Vol. (33) No. (6) 2011

" #  $% &  

     
!
(! ) .

 *# .

**

+ *


***

(2011 / 10 / 16 )2  $1/0 .2011 / 8 / 21  , -

)

34 

 ' (  $   !"# $%& ,  

   
      
    , +.   " &  ,-.   '
$  ,+%" , "' $ . % ) 
. ,  /   0  ' '1 
 , "%
,/-6 ! 
 5    :     ( (&!
 % 2 ' ) ! ( 3
  ,7 .  8  . $
 9     ' 8: (2 ;! ,0 + 5   
. $
   <%2  $
 % 2 
 = >&? <? = 5!
,A% B   B    $      <%2 $=:  = ' @!  /$
0 + 5    >1 (1 <?   
 =  -" (  .9>= %$'  ::" <? C0 
 
,   E +% D9   =
    D  ) ( /-6 5! 
 5    ( 31
.F+  :63 : D
   DA'  =%      (

D D0 +    D/-6 A

    DG   ( & D5  ( & :

5
.H '

. 8 07(  

 8 "
5 5
5   5 8 5
5 9! 0 8 7
#
. 8 07(  
 8 "
5 5
5   5 8 5
5 9! 0 8 +
 7
#
. 8 07(  
 8 "
5 5
5   5 85
5 9! 0 8(
)
+
 
;

203

**

***

2 D(' D-=

$01 ('  6     % +%"  I

 ( 
 = 

2011 (6)  (33)      _ 

    
 
Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Engineering Sciences Series Vol. (33) No. (6) 2011

Comparison between Heat Exchangers

to Improve Their Quality
Dr. John Takla*
Dr. Ayoub Hasan**
Rehab Obied***
(Received 21 / 8 / 2011. Accepted 16 / 10 / 2011)

ABSTRACT

As heat exchangers become an essential part in the industrial machines.

Considerable research have recently occurred on its. It is widely used, in thermal
engineering as steam boilers, steam turbine, and it is an essential part in heating, airconditioning and refrigeration, etc.
This research shows an experimental study on two types of heat exchangers:
PLATE-HEAT-EXCHANGER, and SHELL AND TUBE-HEAT-EXCHANGER. Their
intrinsic parameters have been studied with a steady flow and variable flows in order to
compare the two types and show the effectiveness of each. The experimental part was done
on similar heat exchangers at AL-HAFEZ Company, Aleppo.
We've concluded that the performance of plate heat exchanger is more distinctive
and efficiency than shell and tube heat exchanger, and also in term of heat transfer
coefficient and economy, in the face of many disadvantages as leakage problem, and
reducing average life of this heat exchanger.
Keywords: flow arrangement, counter flow arrangement, shell and tube heat exchanger,
plate heat exchanger, advantages, disadvantages.

Professor, Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical

Engineering, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.
**
Associate Professor, Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical and
Electrical Engineering, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.
***
Postgraduate Student, Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical and
Electrical Engineering, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.

204

Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %&

: !
+ E ,+%" 9  & $ (0 (   E : =
 " 9$&1      
 
   '
$  &  F'     @! "' D $:-" F
 A% L:' $

:<? $% 2 1 1 $ "' A'    /
 . , /. " /  0 
.  ,& ,2 &?    

 ,5  ( L:' G+
 G  <%2 (" '   (0  - ( 2 &M    
      ,  (" ' (0  (    N  8: (2 9   =
  &     
.[2] $
 + & 2 (0  ( 5   
( & 5! DG  ( & 5! ,O  ( & 5!   <?   ( & A' " I
 /

.0 +      
1     <?   A' 31 /
 ,A 
1 $
3 8 A
 (   1  A
1 (    ! ( :)  = $

 "'      .1 ( /-6 A
  
 5     , $ 
. (0 
P
,A
 2 ,A
 := +%"      @!   
 8% (1 (  ,
. I3  5!
"' I
 !$ (1 ) ,[3] 6 $  (  (   @! Q $ A
 & ,A
 :
;!  /-, A
1       "'  
    ( %90 ( .# 2
 0
:  A 'S
.+%"    ( ' % ( 3 $ '  & T
. =  2 100 ( .   9" T
.[1]'
$ ' =   %      ( 3 $   ' T

>(& *
   = $  (1)$5

(2 9 2 ( 1 9
L0 + F A
 <%2 F3 ' L0 +  :)"
% = $

I
1 & .F0 % N "  "      1 <%2 5  ,. U1 <%2 F & %3 L0 +
&  (? .)  G  I
  ,% 0 +    $ 1 0 +    ( 92
205

2 D(' D-=

$01 ('  6     % +%"  I

 ( 
 = 

:63 :  D "'  0'% 0 + V" DA%:  8  $

A '1 9  L0 +%
.[5] >&1 0 + 5    (2)  ( D , 9  & DA%: 

)"
% = $
 (2) $5

:@2 ?#  ?#

,5      ' '    ( & B
  E-  &?  )  1 ( 
0 + 5    (  > .  = <?  6  = 3  &
<? $%
:#  ) ! /1 
 Q6   . 8    

. $ 
 =  
 0 +         ' .1
. $
 =  
 0 +       ' .2
.
 0 +    (  "'  &  .3
.
 0 +     % :63 : ' .4
.(2
 - H '  ('  
 = .5
. $
 =     ( W"1  2
1   )   '- ='   (.  7& .6

:B   A";

 =
 " ( 3 ;!     " 9  $& <%2 A & >&X
E ) ( < %  
: (3)  L3  $& D(  &  
 0 + (   <%2 9 

206

Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %&

HT30X$
   C  (3)$5

 $& :  A'  C

 ( N" " 9   & D(0   = >E !"#
E
:' 9  & 8 , &M 9   =
   ( W"    A ' D    " 9
 = 
2 , .  = 
2 $
 
 =  >& Y...  &M  + ,  F0    ,  ,%
.+%"
:
D
!2  + 
  
! 81
O
E  '
  (" ' F0  8 ( ) (P   -    >E !"1 ;! =
[
P 
: =
  2 ( !" F 
 =    E , $
 
 =  G   5  ( &  ;! (  M
:
' 5 5! 0 + 5   % 7!   ,A
1 ' /-6 A
 5    5
.L0 +
.(  M E ,>   2 = (  E% ,(  >&X = 
 $& N"   <%2 
  9   & 8 >E <%2 % A'    " 9  
.(4)   L3      " 9

$
   C  E
 F (4)$5

.9>E  80 E 2 $  '  9 

  ( 3 A'  C
 ( >= !"1 
207

2 D(' D-=

$01 ('  6     % +%"  I

 ( 
 = 

.A0 (  " 

  @   "' 
    7%2
%   &M  +  E  & -" (   ::"   : =
  " 
.8 G+

2
:)

5 )?   E
;%
C 
C

E
T1

(" ' F0  " 9  &

T2

(" ' F0  N" 9  &

T3

  F0  " 9  &

T4

  F0  N" 9  &

Th

(" ' F0  9  & 8

Tc

  F0  9  & 8

Thm

:' (" ' F0  9  &

Tcm

:'   F0  9  &

L/min

Fh

(" ' F0 %  & 8 

L/min

Fc

  F0 %  & 8 

LMTDtm

  ,% :' 9  & 8

W/m .c

 &M 9   =

  

  F0   

 &M  +



Th = T1 T2
TC = T4 T3

:)

(C )
(C)

:  &M 9   =

  
Qe
(w/m2.c)
A.tm
c = (T3 T4)/(T1 T4)

U=

:  F0   

: &M  +

8%  (   '  . E !"\

208

Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %&

Fh(l/min)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3

G5
 

Fc(l/min) T1
1.98
33.3
2
33.9
1.81
34.5
1.83
33.3

Fh(l/min)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3

Fh(l/min)
1.26
1.26
1.21
1.24
1.23
1.18
1.25

Fh(l/min)
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4

G5

Fc(l/min)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3

)2   >(&
Th
Tc
2.8
1.3
3.1
1.2
3.2
1.4
2.9
1

*   = $

 
 (1) $ 
LMTDtm U[w/m2.c]
c%
10.73254
1250.262
10.1563
15.23025
975.4387
6.89655
16.28342
941.7805
7.52688
14.82972
937.1529
5.95238


 )2   )"
% = $
 
 (2)
T1
Th Tc LMTDtm
U
53.1
11.6 8.4
22.66236
1141.466
53.6
13.6
12
19.88928
1524.86
52.6
11.9 10.1
20.78701
1276.63
53.3
13.1 8.7
21.62545
1350.878

=E 
 )2
Fc(l/min) T1
1.27
34
1.27
31.8
1.26
33.8
1.26
31.8
1.26
31.7
1.26
32.6
1.28
32.2

 
Th
3.1
2
2.7
2.2
2
2.6
2.5

>(&
Tc
1.8
0.7
0.7
1.7
0.7
2.5
1

$ 
c%
25.68807
36.69725
31.76101
26.68712

%
73.34793406
61.15361252
69.11632248
54.4759192

%
73.09725
89.06808
85.67501
67.03903

*   = $

 
 (3) $ 
LMTD
U[w/m2.c]
c%
%
15.04064
987.736
10.2857
58.65187382
9.234755 1037.887
6.60377
35.35404617
14.57714
887.64
4.29448
26.18818235
9.247747 1140.072
15.1786
78.05438764
8.733881 1097.408
6.93069
35.35404617
14.14994 880.5705
14.9701
97.12650046
13.33594 898.3833
6.62252
40.40462419

=E 
 )2   )"
% = $
 
 (4)
Fc(l/min)
T1
Th
Tc LMTDtm
U
1.5
52.2
11.4
9.3
20.33193
1331.948
1.5
52.3
11.8
5.7
21.30465
1315.735
1.5
52.4
11.6
6.9
20.56055
1340.245
1.5
52.4
12.1
8.9
20.25789
1418.901
1.5
53
12.2
6.2
21.46039
1350.464
1.5
52.9
11.4
7
22.92968
1181.048

$ 
c%
30.29316
18.87417
23.07692
28.8961
20.12987
21.73913

%
89.40017
52.93624
65.18555
80.60554
55.69191
67.29045


 )2 )
J ); C  A I
5 )
, C $
! $
 0(+ :H   
.=E G5

.  %  = W" = A '   $& N" ( !"\ 9   & 8 E

.(6) (5) (%  (  (::"  <%2 

= ' &  $%2
%  = ( 

209

=2 D(' D-

 = 
 ( 
 $01 ('  6     % +%"  I

] U[W/m2.c
1700

1500

R2 = 0.78

1300

1100
R2 = 0.9031

900

LMTDtm

700
22

24

18

20

14

16

10

12

) (5    

] U[W/m2.c
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700

R2 = 0.8926

R2 = 0.9136

25

21

23

17

19

15

13

11

) (6  


  " $
  &  L3 /-" F (   - 

     = B-
$% (::
) ( &    
=   8    7
1 (::"  -  B-
 .
S 7
1 0 +% 9
&      1  & ( 3 <=  &M 9   =
   +"
   ,% :' 9
.0 +
  .=E G5
 
 )2 
 I"
 C  A I
5 
, 
 0(+ :
D
) (  )G   ( &    F0  " 9  & 8+ F   + E-2 (7
%
100

90

R2 = 0.8521

)( Poly.

80

)( Poly.

= R2
0.8069

70

60

50
] Tc[C

40
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
) (7

 (  ' - 
S   F0  9  & 8     &M  +  7
1 L3 8
  (.(8) 7
 5  ( &% '
  1 ,
  
 = 0 +  1  &  ( ,
210

 &Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %

R2 = 0.9792

100

R2 = 0.8511

90
80
70

60

50

40
30

] Tc[C

20
9

10

) (8     

  !.
   %   .1 3 .1  ( 5  ( &% '
  7
  .)
, C $
! $
 I
5 
, 
 0(+ :D
D
( )G   ( &  9   =
    F   + E-2(9

R2 = 1

2
R
= 0.9416

] U[W0m2.c
1600

1400

1500

1300

1100

1200

1000

%
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
900

) (9  


 =
    E G+

2 , &M  +   &M 9   =
      7
1 B-
   2 3  E %= @'+ (  ! ,
  $
0 +     1   <%2 
9
   :  (10)  ( 5  ( &% '
  1 D
  
 = 0 +
%
100

= R2
0.5097

80

R2 = 0.9828

60

40
20

] U[W/m2.c
1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

0
800

) (10     

)  
 ,
     3 .1 (  &M 9   =
       &M  +
( 

 .0 +     G   ( &  
 =  .# E1
:
!2  + 
  
! 82
= !; 
2 7%2
% 5!  B2  +  E  & ( (P   -    >E !"1
[
 P
: : =
  2 ( !" F 
 =    E G   ( &  8   E
211

2 D(' D-=

$01 ('  6     % +%"  I

 ( 
 = 

5 5! 0 + 5   % 7!   ,A

1 ' /-6 A
  5    5
.L0 + '
(  M E ,>   2 = (  E% ,(  >&X = 
.9   & 8 >E <%2 % A'    " 9  
$
 %  @!  (%'

) -  E " , .  = 
2  "'     <?  3?
: A' %'
 
  E1   <: .76 8  ' '1  8%
:A
 ( 3 ( &% (" ' F0 % 
 E
.di

Re =

( & 2' (m/sec)w

di= 0.00515 (m) 
S %" :=

Re=2400 A
 ( 3 ( &% 
 E  &
:  " %'
 
Nu=0.023.Re0.8.Prn
:(" ' F0 % )
n=0.4

Re =

:  F0 % A
  ( &% 
 E
.do

Re<105 A
  ( &% 
 E  &
: &    " %'
 
Nu=C.Ren.Prf0.33
C=0.41 ,n=0.6&
: F%
:L0 + <%2 ( &% 
 E
Re=(.A)/
5
Re=5.10 L0 + <%2 
 E  &
Nu=0.33.Re0.8.Pr0.33 : " %'
 

8%   & (   '  . E 

 E !"\
: &  '  = <:
  >(& *   $
 
 (5) $ 
Fc(l/min)

Fh(l/min)

T1

T3

c%

Re"c"

Re"h"

Nu"c"

Nu"h"

1.2
3
1.98
1

1.2
1.14
1.3
3

32.8
53.1
33.3
62.1

26.3
16.1
20.5
24

1355.166
821.1546
1289.556
2076.96

21.53846
3.783784
10.15625
39.37008

93.63933
59.10391
71.11296
99.1728

4917.622
12294.05
8114.076
5286.45

653.2745
834.6145
707.4963
2665.032

145.1136
251.4618
195.974
137.6939

7.977524
8.527663
8.502975
19.58738

Re"h"

Nu"c"

Nu"h"

36.26291
29.0439
29.37967
29.37967

7.678743
11.16818
8.631358
15.02807

9.100834
7.620002
7.690394
7.690394

Fc(l/min)

Fh(l/min)

T1

T3

  )"
% $
 
 (6) $ 
U
c%
%
Re"c"

1.3
2.07
1.5
3

1.3
1.04
1.05
1.05

53.6
38.2
37.8
52.9

20.9
18.9
20
16.8

1524.86
1007.037
1572.863
1451.409

36.69725
19.17098
33.70787
16.89751

212

89.06808
97.48485
96.74233
94.50982

23.49742
37.5306
27.19608
54.39217

 &Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %

   . 
 I"
 A2  I
5 
, 
 0(+ :H
(  )G   ( &    F0  8  + ( E- (11
%

R2 = 0.7047

100

90
80

)( Poly.

)( Poly.

70
60

R2 = 0.9987

50
3

3.5

2.5

1.5

0.5

) ( 11  

)
 &  ( ( D &M  + ) ( 
S 7
<%21 0 +  & <= 7
# B-

2 ,  F0  8     &M  +  +"
 B-
) 
     +%"  = F'1
= .
  $
0 +     B%  1  &M  +  E ( $'+
8%
  .
 I"
 E  0 I
5 
, 
 0(+ :
D
( )G   ( &  E- (12
%
100

90
80

)( Poly.

R2 = 1

70
60

50
"Re"h
850

800

750

700

650

) (12 


213

40
600

=2 D(' D-

 = 
 ( 
 $01 ('  6     % +%"  I

(13)  <%2 

 5  ( &% '
  1
%
100
98
96
94
92
90
88
86
84
82

Poly.
)(

R2 = 0.9426

"Re"h
37

33

35

29

31

27

) (13 

1  +  & (1 B-

31 , &M  + +"
 
 E    7
1 (::"  - ( B-
.0 +    ( 3
  . 
 I"
 $ C   I
5 
 I"
 E  0 0(+ :D
D
( )G   ( &  
   % E- (14
"Re"c
14000

12000
10000

Poly.
)(

R2 = 0.9944

8000
6000
4000

] T3[C

2000
27

25

23

21

19

17

15

) (14


.G   ( &  0 +   % E- : (15)  1

60

50
40

30

R2 = 0.9941

20

Poly.
)(

10
0
22

21

19

20

18

17

16

) (15


(  ". $% (  %   F0 % 

 E +"
   F0  " 9  &    7
 B-
(::

214

 &Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %

  .
 I"
  0 I
5 )
, C $
! $
 0(+:
(  )G   ( &  
   % E- (16
] U[W/m2.c

R2 = 0.7653

2500

2000

1500

)( Linear

1000

500

"Nu"h
19

15

17

11

13

) (16

( )G   ( &  

   % E- (17
] U[W/m2.c

)( Linear
y = 7175.5x - 53670
R2 = 0.9584

"Nu"h
7.7

7.69

7.68

7.66

7.67

7.65

7.64

7.63

7.62

1700
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
7.61

) (17

 

   &M 9   =
    (" ' F0 % %'
E   7
1 B-
(::"  -
 .(   - .
  
 
 I"
  0 I
5 
, 
 0(+:
(  )G   ( &  
   % E- (18
%
100

90
80

70

)( Poly.

60

R2 = 0.9994

50

"Nu"c

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

) (18 


215

40
100

=2 D(' D-

 = 
 ( 
 $01 ('  6     % +%"  I

(  )G   ( &  

   % E- (19
98

97.5
97

96.5
96
95.5

)( Poly.

95

R = 0.6368

94.5
94

16

12

14

10

) (19 


 .(   -  &M  + +"

   F0 % %'
E    7
1 B-
(::"  -
 :
D
B    
 5   % 0 + 5   %  " >&X %  @! 
E
  "  "'  (%) 2
 >   ( 3   % >     >E !"# ;! ,A% B
.(   ( 
 =  >&X
E 8   E 
2 $%2
%    E <%21
" ) 92  = 
2
'.22 (+  "'   :
:( (P&  (%  + <:

)  $
 
 )2   
%

; E
HAC 20
'56kW  2 :

;J
K
MT125
 2
G+
  F
 5 :, 3
 
'


$
TE70/2
   
1

 : ONDA  F

)"
% $
 
 )2   
%

; E

HAC 15
'56Kw  2 :

;J
K
SM 185
 1


$

 F
 ' :, 3

SL70-80
   0 +


G+


 : ONDA  F

 
'

216

 &Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %

  .A2  I
5 
, 
 0(+ :H
(  ).(   - 8  + ( E- (20

95

R2 = 0.6415

100

90
85

80

R2 = 0.9394

)( Poly.

75

)( Poly.

70
65

]Fw[L/min

60
210

170

190

130

150

90

110

)(20

8 E G+

2 
  
 = 0 +      +%  2 E <%2  DL3  DB-
! .0 +   % ;! D % .1 9& :
  .A2  I
5 ;&K ;? 0(+ :
D
(  )8 :63 : ( E- (21
]P[KPs
50

R2 = 1

45

40

35

) ( Poly.

) ( Poly.

30
R2 = 0.9876

25

]Fw[L/min

20

15
210

190

170

150

130

110

90

)( 21

8 E G+

2 ,=:
 1 ! 
S 7
0 +  1 :63 :  & (1 B-

 8  % 7
# B-
  ,
S 7
0 +% /3 =  1 ( :63 : (1 B-
   
 (  .0 +     .1 B% (
 ,  <? %%E :63 : =  9
  .;&K ; I
5 
, 
 0(+ :D
D
(  ):63 :  + ( E- (22

217

=2 D(' D-

 = 
 ( 
 $01 ('  6     % +%"  I

100

R = 0.6432

95

R = 0.9965

90
85

)( Poly.
)( Poly.

80
75

P[kPs
] 50

40

45

35

30

25

20

70
15

) (22 

)
 + ) ( F'1  &  (1 
     B-
 D    &  /-" B-
?<  <? 1 ( :63 :  (X 0 + 
 D +% 96 .# :63 : : D
> = % = 3+  %90 ( <%21  &  <= 
S $
<%21  =   : = /3
.L31 $ & ( '  &  :63 :


":0
 L
 


:  <%2 ( ,"     
 =    H '    C0 
 /

:)  $
: E
4 8

.5  ( &  31    .1

.0 +     . 7
E1 :63 : 
2 ;!  2  % E <%2 
.2
.A'   (  /% 
 ? ( %= +"
 :63 : .3
.0 + ( .1 8'    $' /B
 
 ? .4
.0 +             2 / =? A%:  A
 1 : (? ) D
 $' .5
: M
 T
.0 +     $
E1  &M 9   =
    E <%2 
.1
   2 3 A' ;! $'+
 = E 
2 0 +     $
E1 (   E U .2
    
 !.0 +     
 = Q& " :'% 7
 'E  5
.0 +     
 =   2 :' G+
 (8  / 31 3) . 1  & 6 .3

.0 +     
 =   2 :' G+
 . 1 7
 .4

( 
.C&3     &     1 .1   $
2 C
( & % .5
P
..  2 :' G+

2 0 +  
 = + +% ! .6
.0 +  
 =   + 
 E ( .7

218

Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series 2011 (6)  (33) %&  '
$ %
(  & %&

:)"
% $

#
: E
4 T

.
     7
<%21 9   =
    0 +      -1
:' F  2 3 %E <? ;!  A'  Q
    ( <%21  & ( 3 0 (   -2
.& "
.  2 :' G+
 
    ( B%  61  & 0 +    6 -3

.  2 :' G+


2 
     
 = +"
( ! -4

.
  
 = C&3 - '
  E1   $
2 C
 ,(6

( & -5
  A' ;! Q(+    :63 : , (%'

) - =  +"
 31   -6
.96  : 5!    L0 +
.  2 :' G+

2 
     
 = 3+"
+% -7
:M
 T
    $'+
8  E 
2 /3 ( .1 <?  F+ :63 : 0 +    ;%  .1
.I
 ! H ' .1 (   A'     3 7%& ! ,

 $
E1    @!$ 
   & L0 + /% <%2   .\ F+  :63 31 .2
.  2 :' G+
 
   
.       2 / =? <? 5\' + 1  %" 51 (? ) ,/B
 
  .3

:
%


(%
>1 <%2 
 =  >&? (  (  ,N 
 P. $
 B    (%
 "  -1
P
P
.(  2 $
 %2  W   (.1 1 
') 
 9  ;! (+%" (  ( "'
.C&3 A'    V"      <%2 W"1 ) 1 >&? -2
 &  $
9 +' (   $ 9  "  
 M A' .1  "   F (  -3
. % ) 
6 ) 
) A : <%2 5 E  ( $  %. ) 1 
  "   F  !  1 ? -4
. 2   & <%2 V "   %

219

2 D(' D-=

$01 ('  6     % +%"  I

 ( 
 = 

:I
1. Heat Exchangers Selection, Rating and Thermal Design. Second
Edition.SadikKakaHongtan Liu-Department of Mechanical Engineering.
University of MIAMI, Coral Gables FLORIDA.
2. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. Ramesh k. Shah and Dusan P. Sekulic.
Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
3. Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, A series of Textbook and Reference Books,
founding Editor L. L. Faulkner. Columb Division, Battelle Memorial Institute and
Department of Mechanical Engineering. The Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio.
4. Plate Heat Exchangers, Design, Applications, and Performance. L. Wang, B. Suden
and r. m. Manglik. British Library Catalogning-in-publication Data. WIT press
2007 http://www.witpress.com.
5. Magnusson, B. and Samuelson, B, The story of the Alfa Laval Plate Heat
Exchanger and the Spiral Heat Exchanger, NorstedtsTryckeri, Stockholm, 1985.
6. Clark, D. F, Plate Heat Exchangers. The Chemical Engineers, no.285, pp.275-285,
May 1974.
7. Magnusson, B. The Origins and Evolution of The Alfa Laval Plate Heat Exchanger,
NorsteadTryckeri, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 1985.

:A
T [C]
0
20
40
60
80
100

N
  "
E 3
.106

Cp
102 .
kg/m3
Kj/kg.k
[w/m.k]
[m2/s]
999.9
4.212
55.1
1.789
998.2
4.183
60
1.006
992.2
4.174
63
0.659
983.2
4.178
66
0.478
971.8
4.195
67.6
0.366
968.4
4.22
68.3
0.291

220

Pr
13.67
7.02
4.31
2.98
2.21
1.75